Vikash says he is sure god does not exist
Vložit
- čas přidán 27. 02. 2022
- Support the show at / vimoh
Make a one-time donation at vimoh.stck.me/profile
Please read these rules before commenting. Follow them to the best of your ability. The rules are meant to keep the comment space clean and a safe space for anyone who wishes to participate in good faith.
1. No advocating violence of any kind against anyone for any reason. People doing so will get banned from the channel.
2. No praising or abusing any religion for any reason. Proselytising is not appreciated, nor is making generalised statements about the followers of any religion. People doing so will get banned.
3. No casteism, racism, or sexism. Discriminatory language will get you banned too.
4. Trolling, spamming, use of fake accounts to deceive people about your identity, will also get you banned.
In order to prove or disprove God, we first have to decide ONE definition for God that is common like a law of physics. The problem with the definition of God is that it changes with religions and followers. Therefore, disproving God becomes challenging as it has no set definition.
Exactly, this is the difference between faith and knowledge.
I agree that the answer to "do u know if God exists?" is I don't know. But you cannot answer "I don't know" to the question "do you believe that God exists" because you either believe or you don't. So we would have to respond "I don't believe God exists" just like we would say "I don't believe Santaclause exists".
Vikash bhai homework kro phle.......... Apki bateein khud ko hi contradict kr rhi hai
@Vimoh I feel your position is comprising. If we do not know whether god exists or not then by the same logic we do not know whether Santa Claus, Unicorn or mermaid exists or not. Anybody comes up with any fantasy, we have to confess we don't know because nobody can disprove these things. Though it is a tight or rigorous philosophical position but for all practical purposes ( while arguing with a common person ) we can say god does not exist as there are no proofs of it and we do not need god to explain our existence as it (existence of the creator god ) creates logical fallacy.
The problem is we can never say "i know"
The agreement ends with your authoritarian source wants you to "get rid" of other people.
Must say. I never thought I would find a channel/person on Social media, from India, who would openly call himself/herself as "Atheist" (variation incl, though I dont prefer that term), without falling for usual tropes associated with atheism.
But there is one thing common amongst all the definitions of God- sacredness and divinity. I say this because across all cultures God has been seen as a powerful, supernatural, sacred and divine being filled with legends and folklore about their unimaginable feats. They are also associated with creation and hence I believe there are some fundamental similarities between Gods and there can be a bottom line to their definition. Also keeping in mind, definitions are human constructs and throughout history they have existed as flawed pieces of information that human beings gathered through their observations. They have changed/amended over time. For example, Democracy in ancient Greece was significantly different from what it is now. But then there are few foundational principles which can be identified in both ancient Greece version of Democracy and democracy as we know it today. And as human beings we are keen on adding adjectives to such nouns by calling it primitive-democracy or proto-democracy.
I had a doubt
There are two concepts for god, a personal one and a non-personal one.