Sita's chastity was questioned while Rama was walking on earth. If he did not make these harsh decisions, it would have continued beyond his time on earth. But, because he did what he did, not a single person has ever again questioned Sita's chastity. All the fingers that then pointed at Sita now point at Rama. Sita, went in history as a woman of unquestionable chastity, and Rama, despite all the suffering he endured to uphold Dharma, all his achievements, is still criticized for abandoning Sita. That was Rama's dedication for Sita.
Waah !! Also Rama's decision was ryt just imagine a who suffered all those hardships was now made an object of people's dirty rumors and court politics how hurtful must had it been for her ,so putting aside his heavy heart he let Sita get her freedom just so she doesn't become a broken marionette...
To the point with references. We cannot answer such questions until we understand the nuances of emotions going through his mind at that moment as a King.
Lord Rama loves Sita maa always. Even today everyone questions lord Rama decision and degrades him down just like this boy abhilash is doing ,going to everyone's comment section and replying with same words - reputation, etc etc.
@@82abhilash Who wants reputation? Does the God almighty who created everyone on earth want reputation? Your choice doesn't make any sense. God does not want reputation because God doesn't care about reputation. He only cares about the well-being of his creation, and that too, only for the good people; everyone else can go to hell for their karma. That's why God is always great and will always be great for eternity. Hail God almighty Rama.
@@DieNetaDie Talks have initiated between India and Sri Lanka recently but not much has been finalised. On the other hand, India and Nepal had already signed the agreement.
@@SunilMeena-do7xn Thankfully, our common history is all around us and cannot be dinied. The only thing remaining seems for us Nepalies to do our part and return our country to being a Hindu Kingdom. :)
The problem lies not only with those not reading the scriptures and understanding their essence,we have a leader who follows Gandhian idealogy which took us to the brink saying unabashedly what is there in the murthis and stones.? We are being pushed in to the same situation which led to the partition of this great country.
I m 61 year old, I have learnt our Sanatani culture and Dharma FROM project shivoham, praveen Mohan, j sai deepak, Dr. Anand , Sri Ram Chakradhar, vinod Anna of String, I bow down to them.
@@papaRodanbecause the god you have talked about have given us a choice that we are allowed to pray to anyone as long as we do what is right and never go on the oath of wrongness
And as always thanks for uploading "Doc Film". Thats what i have been crying about since last 6-7 doc films.. this is what we look for in your documentaries. No rightist movement, no chellenges to Leftists.. Just pure and simple slap on the face of misunderstandings and misconceptions through Scriptures "As it is". i know from my heart deep down, "Buddhi" will become a socurce to go to for generations to come.... Bravo.. Your die hard fan.. UD....
Actually he is doing his part in destroying it. Before people had confusion about his actions. Now that they know the release reason, they will have more reasons to dislike Rama.
@@82abhilash Nobody can dislike Lord Rama after reading the original Ramayana aka Valmiki Ramayana. It is literally impossible to dislike Rama especially after realising the fact that Lord Rama suffered because of us i.e humans.
@@jaydutta7711 Lord Rama suffered because he believed it lead him to greatness. It did not. Everyone knows that. Ultimately he committed suicide in shame.He did not suffer because of us. He suffered for the sake of his reputation. He was a slave of his reputation. He would have even sold his own mother for his reputation if it came to that. He certainly drove his brothers, his wife, his father and his devotees to suicide.
Creating the Buddhi Playlist is indeed very commendable!👏 Thank you for this kind of a reference guide which will prove helpful to the current and future generations as well! Respect to you 🙏
I feel really bad for sita no matter what reasons you give that why ram left sita. Sita had suffered a lot. First without home, then without safety, then without husband and having 2 kids without her family. I hope her soul is fine!!
Ikr. No matter how much they say "Shri Ram felt very bad that he left sita in forest" Blah blah, it still doesn't justify the fact that mata sita had to endure so much torture both physically and mentally. A princess who had to endure manual work all her life after marriage 🙇🙌.
I understand. It is therefore I am told that to this day, parents do not name their newborn daughter child as Sita, fearing that she may face difficulties later in life. But Sita's story in itself is that of commitment (spent 14 years along with her husband in exile and in isolation in Lanka), motherhood (bringing up twins on her own) and sacrifice (not reuniting with her husband but letting the earth consume her mortally to return where originally she was found as child) . Many woman who have faced personal difficulties in their own life have drawn strength from that story to face them.
I watched Uttara ramayanam video both in English and Telugu. According to me it is the best documentary on Sri Valmiki Ramayanam with facts. Once again Thank you sir for encouraging me to Study Sri Valmiki Ramayanam, I'm currently in Kishkinda Kanda, Sir I request you to make a video on Kishkinda Kanda 40-43 Sarga. It describes the geography of the world at that time. I'm curious that are those places still exist today?? i'm trying to find out but I have limited resources and lack of sanskrit Knowledge to view another scripture. If you have time please do consider my request.
RAVAN kidnapped duplicate SITA MATA only as per TULSIDAS RAMAYANA GODDESS SITA MATA is a reincarnation of MAHAKALI MATA RAM RAJYA lasted for 11000 years as per BALMIKI RISHI….SITA MATA was never sent to forest again and was always with SHREE RAM….PRABHU RAM left with SITA MATA after 11000 years on their own decision….. Further TULSIDAS has written in his UTTARKAND RAMAYANA, that MULTIVERSE exists… multiple different AYODHYAS in various earth like planets, but only one SHREE RAM
@@rajeshkumar98769 oh God I don't want to argue whether Uttara Ramayanam is written by Valmiki Maharishi or not check his documentary then you will be clear or else even if you read Bala Kanda of Valmiki Ramayanam then you will get to know.
Uttara ramayanam is the reason that Rama fell from grace. It is not part of Tulasi Ramayan precisely because this truth had to be concealed. By the time of Tulasi Das, Ramayana was already unpopular. He revived it by writing in the local language and leaving the last book out.
Even today, the other religion people troll many of the hindu Gods but no one says a single word against the character of sita... This was the actual intension of Srirama... He always wanted to safeguard her reputation...
She is actually protected by rama.. Questioning character of woman is just killing woman with no weapon.. This thing is understood by Lord Ram... He knows that she is fire and nothing can burn her.
@@ranirathi3379tell me one thing. If he wanted, he can enjoy with 100 s of virgin girls daily in his kingdom. But why did he fought for Sita and gathered army and built ramasethu for seetha even he don't know about her virginity?? He became villain for that then if he went kingdom without seeta he can enjoy as he wants
The people of Ayodhya didn't have any way to confirm that the blood line carried by Maa Sita is pure.....from their position the inheritor of Rama is going to become their King and they have a right question the purity of blood line as it was the only criteria to become a King and those times King was the fulcrum on which the whole society revolved.....the all powerful King
Namaskaram Sir for the entire content, the new playlist titled "Buddhi" and your vast knowledge of exact studies and research explained in most simple loud-n-clear manner. Such inputs are most required for many like us to understand our basics well hence thank you and best wishes for your future endeavors JaiSreeRam
Efforts are indeed commendable. Even though he does not realize it, he just proved what a loser Rama is. He abandoned his wife to protect his reputation and lost both wife and reputation. So, double loser.
@@82abhilash Mind your language 😡 How dare you to call an AVATAR of the Supreme God Vishnu a loser!!! ?? Lord Rama is a super Victorious Hero and he will always be for the eternity. If anyone read the original Ramayana aka Valmiki Ramayana, they cannot stop themselves from loving Lord Rama from the bottom of their heart. Hail Lord Rama 🙏
@@jaydutta7711 Sorry, he is not a loser. He is a double loser. He abandoned his wife to preserve his reputation and lost both his wife and his reputation. Finally he committed suicide, so triple loser. He is not an Avatar, he is not a supreme lord, he is a fake hero. Valmiki Ramayana reveals just as much. The only bigger losers are his devotees.
@@marymurphysinha9370 No sister. The video explains nothing. It is the same old pattern repeatedly mindlessly and without thought. Reading the Ramayana makes civilized people rightly disturbed. Because people don't actually believe that a married woman loses her chastity if she is raped. Do you believe that a married woman loses her chastity if she is raped?
Sir, one clarification: when someone comments on the queen, is it not the king's duty to explain what has actually happened instead of going by what was commented. In general, kings needs to analyze the statement made by any person ( sita, in this context) and rama needs to explain it to the person who commented. If he punished sita by hearing some words by a random person, then it may prove that the person who commented is right. I am just thinking that the king could have gone as per dharma by proving/disproving the statement in the court before taking the decision.. please help me to understand this concept
See, from what I understand, politically there are some rules that a ruler must follow for the dharma to function properly, it's not as simple as just proving his point and moving on. Rama is a king, not a commoner. For instance, if you look at this scenario from today's point of view, why do we think our government doesn't accept the women back who were forced to join ISIS, but have now realized and want to return. The women's parents still plead our government to bring them back. Why do you think our government doesn't consider their pleas? They are brain washed people, they may pose a threat to the country in the future. It's for the safety and security of the country. Similarly, maa Sita was in captivity with the enemy country as well. The women who were in captivity in Syria were common people. But, in Rama's scenario, Maa Seeta was going to become queen and rule the country, probably a major part of the earth, back then. How serious should a king be about this? After the abduction of Seeta, it's become a political thing now, no more a personal issue for Rama. She is his dear wife and he knows very well about her, but there's nothing personal for a ruler who puts his life before his country. Another point in my understanding is, it's not good for the king to have emotional weaknesses any time in his life. It's very dangerous and there's 100% chance for the enemy countries to take advantage of this. So, it's very important for Rama to prove to his citizens that he has no personal weaknesses, and his country's well being is his foremost responsibility. It's the personal sacrifice a king has done for his dharma as a ruler of a country. Rama is dharma personified, that's the greatness of our Rama.🙏
RAVAN kidnapped duplicate SITA MATA only as per TULSIDAS RAMAYANA GODDESS SITA MATA is a reincarnation of MAHAKALI MATA RAM RAJYA lasted for 11000 years as per BALMIKI RISHI….SITA MATA was never sent to forest again and was always with SHREE RAM….PRABHU RAM left with SITA MATA after 11000 years on their own decision….. Further TULSIDAS has written in his UTTARKAND RAMAYANA, that MULTIVERSE exists… multiple different AYODHYAS in various earth like planets, but only one SHREE RAM
I think i might have a good enough explanation...at least something which satisfies me and makes sense. After the war, lord rama and maata sita were coronated king and queen. There was celebration all around in Ayodhya! And the epic of lord ram's battle against raavana spread like wildfire. And of course people, i assume, got to know about maata sita's agni-pravesha which was proof enough of her chastity and purity. But you see my friend, we live in a society and so did the people at that time. Gossip is not something one can really fight against, it's a coward of an enemy, but unkillable all the same, immortal even. And people gossiped, in-spite of the truth. And the dhobi was just more vocal than your average citizen but even he ,I assume, would falter and curse himself for saying what he did if he actually met lord rama and maata sita in person. Lord rama heard about the way the public talked about his wife, the queen and questioned her chastity. How do you think he felt about it? for a man who had been through so much suffering, even going as far as to indirectly make maata sita, his love, his wife, his very life undergo an agni-pravesha just for the sake of his people so that they never doubt her, this must've been absolutely heart wrenching. Rama failed. The scion of ikshvaku, the very incarnation of Mahavishnu, the preserver, was defeated. Now, could he have given an explanation? absolutely so! punished the dhobi and whoever else for talking ill about the queen? i mean Rama would never have even thought about it but you know how cruel kings can be! But one must realize that the agni-pravesha was the absolute pinnacle of proof and nothing could top that. So rama did the one thing only he could. He sent maata sita away. And look at all the hate he gets even now for what he did. Does anyone ever question maata sita's chastity now in modern times? No. But do some people absolutely abhor lord ram? Yes , and so did i for a long time now! That is how great Lord rama is! Some might say he failed as a husband, but i think not. if anything he failed in love, he couldn't be with his beloved but he made sure that her honour was intact and he beared the brunt of misfortune. It has taken me literal years to understand our lord's actions. JAI SHRE RAM!
@@achyuthanand5006 Yes, Rama did not fail. Atleast for maa Sita, Rama is never a failure, and Rama knows that. But, inspite of sacrificing so much, the society still judges him. As far as his love for his wife is concerned, who are we as a society to judge. This society never understands. Rama after he orders Lakshman to leave her in the forest, also makes sure that she's left nearby Rishi Valmiki's ashram so she'd be taken care of. People don't recognize these gestures and still judge his love towards his wife. One can understand Rama only by reading Valmiki Ramayan. Even I used to argue a lot with my mother when young. But now I understand that people need to have lot of maturity to understand both "Raja Ram" and "Sita Ram".
Jai Shree Ram. Whatever hardships that came his way, he always dealt it in a controlled manner, to spread Dharma. Shree Ram is a perfect role model for everyone.
These aren't just stories, these are documentaries of life of that time and all the difficulties and personal crisis that came with maintaining the stability and integrity of that era so everyone can prosper.
No one prospers in a land where there is no justice for women. Read Ramayana till the end. Rama and his followers committed mass suicide. No one lived in Ayodhya city for a long time after that.
@@82abhilash Lord Rama is Supreme God Vishnu himself, and Vishnu can never fall from grace, regardless of his actions, as everything is created and governed by Vishnu. Therefore, I can confidently say that even though Uttarakhand is not authentic as it is not a part of Valmiki Ramayana, it played a crucial role in garnering more respect for Lord Rama. The individual who authored the Uttarakhand for Ramayana was undoubtedly in favor of Lord Rama and was a devoted follower of him.
This series ' Buddhi ' is something will be a game changer for your channel , it should be focused towards breaking myths and bringing the sanatanis of all castes together , Sadhuvaad to the punyaaatma within you
మీరు తెలుగు వారు అయినందుకు చాలా గర్వంగా ఉంది. మన తెలుగు వారు ఇంత లోతుగా శోధించి, మన హిందూ వాగ్మయాన్ని ప్రపంచానికి సరి అయిన రీతిలో, ఏ ఒక్క సూక్ష్మ లోపానికి తావు ఇయ్యక, సరళంగా అందరికీ అర్థం అవులాగున తయారు చేస్తున్నందుకు....పాదాభివందనాలు.
Uttar kand (referred to here as Uttar Ramayan) is not part of original Valmiki Ramayan. It has been added later to satisfy the questions and curiosities of people. The style of the shlokas in Uttar Kand added in Valmiki is also very different to all other kands. It genuinely only appears in Tulsi Ramayan.
In addition to my previous comment, it also reflects that the whole narrative is very emotionally made decision. Just like how many of us, who intend to be righteous and idealistic in nature, believe we are in the right path n this is how it will be right. But, while walking that path, we hurt a lot of those who are not on the same page even if they are right . May be in the assumption and presumption of us always trying to prove to be right, we too make mistakes. And sometimes really costly mistakes unaware of what to actually do! We are always forced to believe rama is a good boy and he listens to people n follows dharma. How can a good leader just be a listener. Shouldn’t be also carry his own opinions and influence people the right way to think and direct them towards growth? Similar examples are there in many stories, Like, Shakuntala Devi and her husband (how she was abandoned), Later, in Jodha Akbar (idk the exact factual info, but through the movie n some references, how Jodha was questioned and she left home n then Akbar went back to get her when he realised), So it’s always about a man committing a mistake in haste, or in the fear of society’s failure of judgement that a woman is questioned and punished! For a man to re-realise her worth n purity? It’s probably the repeated pattern n mistake . May be it’s time to advocate the righteousness by actually giving a direction to the society on how to judge, how to not fear society’s judgement, how to not misguide women to bear the wrath of all the patriarchal forces for her to still prove her innocence! It needs a severe change before propagating more on how it was righteous at all. May be the take away could just be, “A man like rama has also committed a mistake, and one must learn to not repeat the same pattern. Atleast rise up and be more bold to face the world together rather than making harsh self made decisions in the name of righteousness!
Rama was spineless enough to not show the true dharma to the public. Already Sita had done agnipariksha and the public still is questioning her chastity. The public will never learn and will gossip however much Rama do anything about it. Because that's how public are, they gossip and poke into things. And to implore further, imagine Sita was raped and to take it more further, imagine she got pregnant from that. Can Rama be the real Puroshottama and show to the people that it was not her fault. Even if her 'purity' is gone, it's not her fault and we must take care of the weak and the victims and not push them off like garbage. He could have showed a new and improved Dharma for his people. As Dharma keeps changing according to time and place, Dharma doesn't have to be a static entity. Rama was a coward and a fool. Coward for not doing the right thing. Fool for taking gossip among public seriously than teaching them about truth, critical thinking and empathy. End of story.
@@slowdown7276 I agree. I wouldn’t like to ill speak or call names. But it’s just not righteous from all the stories we have been listening to. This story always invokes the idea that only when a woman is put through misery from an external place, a man is willing to do whatever n sail oceans. But if it’s because of him? Is he willing to take the charge? That’s the only answer I’m waiting to know if this story has anything more to offer. If not, it’s not right.
your comments relieved me…yes why to get into that thinking of choosing between praja and wife. Why womens character is always in question. You being so powerful and enormous god couldnt save your wife from Ravan and later question her chastity. It hurts my heart..if a man like lord Ram couldn’t save Sita Ma ..then its better to be self reliant like Sita Ma who lived alone in Valmiki ashram and become self dependent..thats my take from Ramayan❤
Thanks for your videos sir 🙏🙏🙏 Please do a very detailed video on Sundarakanda. . I want to listen on a regular basis and want to apply in my daily life both in personal and professional contexts. Jai Shree Ram 🙏🙏🙏
There are some neo Buddhists who are started talking against sanatan Dharma. Plz make to Doc about to show the similarities between Sanatan Dharma & Buddhism.
I come to your channel to check the facts and to get interpretations of the scriptures. Can you please suggest which Ramayana should be read, Hindi or English? There are so many and I want to pick one which is close to the original. Thank you so much for this channel.
What very few people do not understand is that Sita-Rama together are the Supreme Personality of Godhead. You can't separate the two. Can you separate the sun from the sunshine? Lord Rama is Shakti-man and Mother Sita is Shakti, you can never separate them from each other. From our distorted perspective, it may appear that Lord Rama has separated from Mother Sita, but in reality it is not possible. From our perspective it may seem that the sun is born from the sea, but in reality the sun is far away and untouched by the sea. Hare Krishna! 🙏
Thank you sooooo much for addressing this in your video's; I have been asking this question to family for years, right. I cannot believe that you could/would watch your spouse, whom you are devoted to burn to death in front of your very eyes. Regardless of Dharma, it is hard to comprehend, they had satvic powers through years of meditation etc., so, I believe, that Lord Rama would have known deep down within, that Ma Sita was completely innocent and utterly devoted to him. Makes me cry just thinking about it, so sad, truly. I will definitely be subscribing to your other channel. Namaste from the UK & JSR!
Nuvvu “ Kaarana Janmudavu “ naayana. You were sent to this God’s green Earth for a reason and you are truly making an impact. There are no words to thank you for what you are doing and what you have done so far to bring the eternal knowledge of our Santana Dharma to the fore and educate millions of people. Kudos Shri Gurubhyo Namaha
thank you Sir. The way you create Buddhi Playlist, could you please create playlist or a create a video about relationship in time, among each other of various puranasa together ? For example: draw a relationship among [ Veda, vedanta, upanishattu, Ramayana, Mahabharata, bhgavadgita ..and the current Kaliyuga ..] in a short crash course..for many who exploring and trying to find the whole context. It will help for everyone.
Waah !! Also Rama's decision was ryt just imagine a who suffered all those hardships was now made an object of people's dirty rumors and court politics how hurtful must had it been for her ,so putting aside his heavy heart he let Sita get her freedom just so she doesn't become a broken marionette...
*@pikachue602* Excuse me, Miss pikachue602. Don't judge Lord Rama by listening to the ranndom commentary from the internet. Do more research about Valmiki Ramayana before getting into your conclusion... Because according to Valmiki Ramayana Lord Rama never listened to any lies of people. Hence Lord Rama never questioned his wife i.e Sita's chastity. It was the people around Sita who raised question on her chastity because she was going to be a Queen of Ayodhya. And Lord Rama knew that Sita would understand, because, She as the queen has also got the responsibility of the state. Once, there is an image tarnishing question from the public, she cannot play deaf and continue being their queen. Even if the layman's question was answered by Rama and put an end there, there's no guarantee that the same question of Sita's chastity wouldn't arise in the future. Maa Sita understood that the only solution was to give Agnipariksha to prove her right because she knew that the God Vishnu will save her from the fire 🔥 obviously. And thus the fire test was Sita’s decision, not Rama’s. Lord Rama just saved her From the fire. And Sita's last sacrifice was also not for her own self respect, she was not that weak and helpless wóman that she'll sacrifice herself for the sake of her own self-respect. Sita sacrificed herself for not being able to tolerate the insult of her husband in front of her what he was witnessing from the thankless people of Ayodhya. That's what triggered Mata Sita to volunteer exist from her life to her eternal abode Vaikuntha. Don't forget Sita was an embodiment of a Goddess.
Bringing our historical and cultural heritages with easy to follow narratives including proper sloka references, Commendable Job, Hats off to you. Please continue with your great work
Bro please do a video on earth shape in hindu scriptures and planets described by Hindu scriptures. Difference between the words. 1) bhugol- sphere 2) bhumandal- circular plane 3) bhulokh- plane of existence or dimension. Each word is used in different places of our scriptures So please do a video on earths shape in Hinduism.with scripture references Please clarify this
Despite everything being explained well in the video, people are still asking stupid questions. Many times the circumstances are such where the difference between righteousness and unrighteousness becomes very less, in that situation Shri Ram took a decision which a common man can never take. If today's young generation is so stupid that they cannot understand this, then it is not the fault of Shri Ram. (The respect for Shri Ram has increased in my heart) I don't know whether Ramayana is true or not, I maintain a neutral viewpoint between theists and atheists. But after reading Ramayana from beginning to end, there is no doubt left in my mind about the character of Lord Rama. I respect Shri Ram and will always do so.
A salute to your analysis of Ramayana. Rama was Dharmatma and he followed Raja dharma and abandoned Sita who was pregnant without even telling her. This act of Rama was not an injustice to Sita? If Rama loved Sita so much why didn't he sacrificed the throne and went with Sita???
Sita's chastity was questioned while Rama was walking on earth. If he did not make these harsh decisions, it would have continued beyond his time on earth. But, because he did what he did, not a single person has ever again questioned Sita's chastity. All the fingers that then pointed at Sita now point at Rama. Sita, went in history as a woman of unquestionable chastity, and Rama, despite all the suffering he endured to uphold Dharma, all his achievements, is still criticized for abandoning Sita. That was Rama's dedication for Sita.
Well said 🙏🕉☀
Waah !! Also Rama's decision was ryt just imagine a who suffered all those hardships was now made an object of people's dirty rumors and court politics how hurtful must had it been for her ,so putting aside his heavy heart he let Sita get her freedom just so she doesn't become a broken marionette...
😭
❤
True said
To the point with references. We cannot answer such questions until we understand the nuances of emotions going through his mind at that moment as a King.
No nuances. He just wants reputation. That too only his, everyone else can go to hell.
Lord Rama loves Sita maa always. Even today everyone questions lord Rama decision and degrades him down just like this boy abhilash is doing ,going to everyone's comment section and replying with same words - reputation, etc etc.
@@82abhilash Who wants reputation? Does the God almighty who created everyone on earth want reputation? Your choice doesn't make any sense. God does not want reputation because God doesn't care about reputation. He only cares about the well-being of his creation, and that too, only for the good people; everyone else can go to hell for their karma. That's why God is always great and will always be great for eternity. Hail God almighty Rama.
Hi from Nepal.
That is why Ram Rajya is Ram Rajya..
OM
And so happy about Bhagwan Ram's temple at his birthplace.
There is also Remayana Circuit being developed at India-Nepal border.
@@SunilMeena-do7xn
That sounds nice. And is Sri Lanka included?
🙏
@@DieNetaDie Talks have initiated between India and Sri Lanka recently but not much has been finalised. On the other hand, India and Nepal had already signed the agreement.
@@SunilMeena-do7xn Thankfully, our common history is all around us and cannot be dinied. The only thing remaining seems for us Nepalies to do our part and return our country to being a Hindu Kingdom. :)
@@DieNetaDiewach praveen mohan for sanatan dharm temple my nepal bro
The problem lies not only with those not reading the scriptures and understanding their essence,we have a leader who follows Gandhian idealogy which took us to the brink saying unabashedly what is there in the murthis and stones.? We are being pushed in to the same situation which led to the partition of this great country.
Who's that leader?
@@naraendrareddy273 Hindu hriday samrat.
@@hanumanthji Don't beat around the bush...be clear! Have guts to name the name, unless you are fearful of the shame.
Why insulting sita, who is she did anyone know..she itself God . ..she will destroy bad karma.she is the mother of all creatures on earth.
Dear Moron, If that's so, why is he worshipping at every temple?
boycott adipurush. how shamelessly the film is insulting our culture, raavan is made to look like a cringe tiktoker. no words
I m 61 year old, I have learnt our Sanatani culture and Dharma FROM project shivoham, praveen Mohan, j sai deepak, Dr. Anand , Sri Ram Chakradhar, vinod Anna of String, I bow down to them.
why not bow to only one almighty? why do we bow to every god, lord or avatars of God. why not just GOD. please answer
@@papaRodanbecause the god you have talked about have given us a choice that we are allowed to pray to anyone as long as we do what is right and never go on the oath of wrongness
@@arjun_aashu where did he said this may i know any verse from veda or puran?
And as always thanks for uploading "Doc Film". Thats what i have been crying about since last 6-7 doc films.. this is what we look for in your documentaries. No rightist movement, no chellenges to Leftists.. Just pure and simple slap on the face of misunderstandings and misconceptions through Scriptures "As it is". i know from my heart deep down, "Buddhi" will become a socurce to go to for generations to come.... Bravo.. Your die hard fan.. UD....
thank u for reviving our culture and history
Actually he is doing his part in destroying it. Before people had confusion about his actions. Now that they know the release reason, they will have more reasons to dislike Rama.
@@82abhilash Nobody can dislike Lord Rama after reading the original Ramayana aka Valmiki Ramayana. It is literally impossible to dislike Rama especially after realising the fact that Lord Rama suffered because of us i.e humans.
@@jaydutta7711 Lord Rama suffered because he believed it lead him to greatness. It did not. Everyone knows that. Ultimately he committed suicide in shame.He did not suffer because of us. He suffered for the sake of his reputation. He was a slave of his reputation. He would have even sold his own mother for his reputation if it came to that. He certainly drove his brothers, his wife, his father and his devotees to suicide.
@@user-zo9jc2ng6f You have no IQ to destroy. So you just copy paste emoticons.
@@82abhilashbausdike tere baap ne suicide commit,Kiya hoga na kyuki teri ma ne terko kuch sikhaya nahi
Creating the Buddhi Playlist is indeed very commendable!👏 Thank you for this kind of a reference guide which will prove helpful to the current and future generations as well! Respect to you 🙏
I feel really bad for sita no matter what reasons you give that why ram left sita. Sita had suffered a lot. First without home, then without safety, then without husband and having 2 kids without her family. I hope her soul is fine!!
Ikr. No matter how much they say "Shri Ram felt very bad that he left sita in forest" Blah blah, it still doesn't justify the fact that mata sita had to endure so much torture both physically and mentally. A princess who had to endure manual work all her life after marriage 🙇🙌.
I understand. It is therefore I am told that to this day, parents do not name their newborn daughter child as Sita, fearing that she may face difficulties later in life. But Sita's story in itself is that of commitment (spent 14 years along with her husband in exile and in isolation in Lanka), motherhood (bringing up twins on her own) and sacrifice (not reuniting with her husband but letting the earth consume her mortally to return where originally she was found as child) . Many woman who have faced personal difficulties in their own life have drawn strength from that story to face them.
I watched Uttara ramayanam video both in English and Telugu. According to me it is the best documentary on Sri Valmiki Ramayanam with facts. Once again Thank you sir for encouraging me to Study Sri Valmiki Ramayanam, I'm currently in Kishkinda Kanda, Sir I request you to make a video on Kishkinda Kanda 40-43 Sarga. It describes the geography of the world at that time. I'm curious that are those places still exist today?? i'm trying to find out but I have limited resources and lack of sanskrit Knowledge to view another scripture. If you have time please do consider my request.
Watch Nilesh nilkanth oak video on it and also on Mahabharat geography
@@nishantketu1174 Can you please share the link?
RAVAN kidnapped duplicate SITA MATA only as per TULSIDAS RAMAYANA
GODDESS SITA MATA is a reincarnation of MAHAKALI MATA
RAM RAJYA lasted for 11000 years as per BALMIKI RISHI….SITA MATA was never sent to forest again and was always with SHREE RAM….PRABHU RAM left with SITA MATA after 11000 years on their own decision…..
Further TULSIDAS has written in his UTTARKAND RAMAYANA, that MULTIVERSE exists… multiple different AYODHYAS in various earth like planets, but only one SHREE RAM
@@rajeshkumar98769 oh God I don't want to argue whether Uttara Ramayanam is written by Valmiki Maharishi or not check his documentary then you will be clear or else even if you read Bala Kanda of Valmiki Ramayanam then you will get to know.
Uttara ramayanam is the reason that Rama fell from grace. It is not part of Tulasi Ramayan precisely because this truth had to be concealed. By the time of Tulasi Das, Ramayana was already unpopular. He revived it by writing in the local language and leaving the last book out.
Even today, the other religion people troll many of the hindu Gods but no one says a single word against the character of sita...
This was the actual intension of Srirama... He always wanted to safeguard her reputation...
safeguard her REPUTATION, not HERSELF? nice.
@@ranirathi3379 HER reputation was an important part of HERSELF... Even Sita cared about Lord Rama's reputation. It was a mutual decision.
I think for women or men their character and reputation is highest
She is actually protected by rama.. Questioning character of woman is just killing woman with no weapon.. This thing is understood by Lord Ram... He knows that she is fire and nothing can burn her.
@@ranirathi3379tell me one thing. If he wanted, he can enjoy with 100 s of virgin girls daily in his kingdom. But why did he fought for Sita and gathered army and built ramasethu for seetha even he don't know about her virginity?? He became villain for that then if he went kingdom without seeta he can enjoy as he wants
The people of Ayodhya didn't have any way to confirm that the blood line carried by Maa Sita is pure.....from their position the inheritor of Rama is going to become their King and they have a right question the purity of blood line as it was the only criteria to become a King and those times King was the fulcrum on which the whole society revolved.....the all powerful King
This is a really good point that people fail to see
@@ashgoku6966proves how dumb those people were didn't even know about DNA 😂😂😂
Thank you for the playlist. The most needed in current times I would say. Lots of love to you.
Namaskaram Sir for the entire content, the new playlist titled "Buddhi" and your vast knowledge of exact studies and research explained in most simple loud-n-clear manner. Such inputs are most required for many like us to understand our basics well hence thank you and best wishes for your future endeavors JaiSreeRam
Excellent work🙏🙏.
The last part where the shankh blows is goosebumps.
People of India need this.
Excellent, superb, hatsoff to u sirji, god bless u
Your efforts are commendable, really how naive we are, lacking knowledge about our own culture. Kudos sir 👏 🙌
Efforts are indeed commendable. Even though he does not realize it, he just proved what a loser Rama is. He abandoned his wife to protect his reputation and lost both wife and reputation. So, double loser.
@@82abhilash Mind your language 😡 How dare you to call an AVATAR of the Supreme God Vishnu a loser!!! ?? Lord Rama is a super Victorious Hero and he will always be for the eternity. If anyone read the original Ramayana aka Valmiki Ramayana, they cannot stop themselves from loving Lord Rama from the bottom of their heart. Hail Lord Rama 🙏
@@jaydutta7711 Sorry, he is not a loser. He is a double loser. He abandoned his wife to preserve his reputation and lost both his wife and his reputation. Finally he committed suicide, so triple loser. He is not an Avatar, he is not a supreme lord, he is a fake hero. Valmiki Ramayana reveals just as much. The only bigger losers are his devotees.
@@82abhilashThis is what happens when no one reads Ramayana. Everything has been explained in this video, still you are talking nonsense.
@@marymurphysinha9370 No sister. The video explains nothing. It is the same old pattern repeatedly mindlessly and without thought. Reading the Ramayana makes civilized people rightly disturbed. Because people don't actually believe that a married woman loses her chastity if she is raped. Do you believe that a married woman loses her chastity if she is raped?
What an awesome voice you have. The shlokas come alive when spoken by you😊😊❤
जय श्री राम ♥️
Finally you made this video...great.. good explanation...Jai Sri Ram..🙏🚩
Thanks alot for the information. You're doing an amazing work.
The amount of clarity you provide is impeccable. Continue the good work 👏👏👏
No clarity. Just a tired old talking point.
Thank you for this. Deeply grateful 🙏🙏
Respect Anna !! Love all the videos and the amount of research that goes into making each one of these...
Research? This is the same tired talking point that everyone else is saying.
Jai shri ram🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩
VERY VERY VERY NICE AND THANKS FOR BRIEF OF RAMAYAN
Jai shree rama
this is very much needed in our time and age. a moral dilemma about duty is fundamental to understand these stories
No moral dilemma. What Rama did was highly immoral. Future generations will do abhisheka of his murthy in their own urine.
@@82abhilash communists ka 14
Great bro chala Manchiga explain chesthunav 👏👏
Keep up the good work Project Shivoham 💪💐
Very good review of a highly noble personality. Thank you so much for the share.
Brilliant ❗ ❗ wata "killer" finishing line.. let's arm 'up' ourselves against the scavengers.. Jai Jai Shree Ram 🙏💪
Sir, one clarification: when someone comments on the queen, is it not the king's duty to explain what has actually happened instead of going by what was commented. In general, kings needs to analyze the statement made by any person ( sita, in this context) and rama needs to explain it to the person who commented. If he punished sita by hearing some words by a random person, then it may prove that the person who commented is right. I am just thinking that the king could have gone as per dharma by proving/disproving the statement in the court before taking the decision.. please help me to understand this concept
valid point you have there
See, from what I understand, politically there are some rules that a ruler must follow for the dharma to function properly, it's not as simple as just proving his point and moving on. Rama is a king, not a commoner. For instance, if you look at this scenario from today's point of view, why do we think our government doesn't accept the women back who were forced to join ISIS, but have now realized and want to return. The women's parents still plead our government to bring them back. Why do you think our government doesn't consider their pleas? They are brain washed people, they may pose a threat to the country in the future. It's for the safety and security of the country. Similarly, maa Sita was in captivity with the enemy country as well. The women who were in captivity in Syria were common people. But, in Rama's scenario, Maa Seeta was going to become queen and rule the country, probably a major part of the earth, back then. How serious should a king be about this? After the abduction of Seeta, it's become a political thing now, no more a personal issue for Rama. She is his dear wife and he knows very well about her, but there's nothing personal for a ruler who puts his life before his country.
Another point in my understanding is, it's not good for the king to have emotional weaknesses any time in his life. It's very dangerous and there's 100% chance for the enemy countries to take advantage of this. So, it's very important for Rama to prove to his citizens that he has no personal weaknesses, and his country's well being is his foremost responsibility.
It's the personal sacrifice a king has done for his dharma as a ruler of a country. Rama is dharma personified, that's the greatness of our Rama.🙏
RAVAN kidnapped duplicate SITA MATA only as per TULSIDAS RAMAYANA
GODDESS SITA MATA is a reincarnation of MAHAKALI MATA
RAM RAJYA lasted for 11000 years as per BALMIKI RISHI….SITA MATA was never sent to forest again and was always with SHREE RAM….PRABHU RAM left with SITA MATA after 11000 years on their own decision…..
Further TULSIDAS has written in his UTTARKAND RAMAYANA, that MULTIVERSE exists… multiple different AYODHYAS in various earth like planets, but only one SHREE RAM
I think i might have a good enough explanation...at least something which satisfies me and makes sense. After the war, lord rama and maata sita were coronated king and queen. There was celebration all around in Ayodhya! And the epic of lord ram's battle against raavana spread like wildfire. And of course people, i assume, got to know about maata sita's agni-pravesha which was proof enough of her chastity and purity.
But you see my friend, we live in a society and so did the people at that time. Gossip is not something one can really fight against, it's a coward of an enemy, but unkillable all the same, immortal even. And people gossiped, in-spite of the truth. And the dhobi was just more vocal than your average citizen but even he ,I assume, would falter and curse himself for saying what he did if he actually met lord rama and maata sita in person. Lord rama heard about the way the public talked about his wife, the queen and questioned her chastity. How do you think he felt about it? for a man who had been through so much suffering, even going as far as to indirectly make maata sita, his love, his wife, his very life undergo an agni-pravesha just for the sake of his people so that they never doubt her, this must've been absolutely heart wrenching.
Rama failed. The scion of ikshvaku, the very incarnation of Mahavishnu, the preserver, was defeated.
Now, could he have given an explanation? absolutely so! punished the dhobi and whoever else for talking ill about the queen? i mean Rama would never have even thought about it but you know how cruel kings can be! But one must realize that the agni-pravesha was the absolute pinnacle of proof and nothing could top that.
So rama did the one thing only he could.
He sent maata sita away. And look at all the hate he gets even now for what he did. Does anyone ever question maata sita's chastity now in modern times? No. But do some people absolutely abhor lord ram? Yes , and so did i for a long time now! That is how great Lord rama is! Some might say he failed as a husband, but i think not. if anything he failed in love, he couldn't be with his beloved but he made sure that her honour was intact and he beared the brunt of misfortune. It has taken me literal years to understand our lord's actions. JAI SHRE RAM!
@@achyuthanand5006 Yes, Rama did not fail. Atleast for maa Sita, Rama is never a failure, and Rama knows that. But, inspite of sacrificing so much, the society still judges him. As far as his love for his wife is concerned, who are we as a society to judge. This society never understands. Rama after he orders Lakshman to leave her in the forest, also makes sure that she's left nearby Rishi Valmiki's ashram so she'd be taken care of. People don't recognize these gestures and still judge his love towards his wife. One can understand Rama only by reading Valmiki Ramayan.
Even I used to argue a lot with my mother when young. But now I understand that people need to have lot of maturity to understand both "Raja Ram" and "Sita Ram".
Namaskaram Project Shivoham, Sri Gurubhyo namaha, Wishwa Guru Bharatha matha ki Jayaho.
Namaskaram ji thank you. Jai shree Ram
Very nice work sir jay shree ram ❤
🙏🏻🏵️🙏🏻 सीताराम 🙏🏼🏵️🙏🏼
Brave 👍
God Bless🙏
You are doing fantastic job
Jai Shree Ram. Whatever hardships that came his way, he always dealt it in a controlled manner, to spread Dharma. Shree Ram is a perfect role model for everyone.
@@soultune908 I agree.
Jai shree Ram 🙏
Thanks for your valuable video ☺️
জয় শ্রী রাম।
जय श्री राम।
Jai Shree Ram.
జై శ్రీ రామ్
Absolutely amazing bro 😍🔥🔥😍🔥🙏
These aren't just stories, these are documentaries of life of that time and all the difficulties and personal crisis that came with maintaining the stability and integrity of that era so everyone can prosper.
No one prospers in a land where there is no justice for women. Read Ramayana till the end. Rama and his followers committed mass suicide. No one lived in Ayodhya city for a long time after that.
@@82abhilash Lord Rama is Supreme God Vishnu himself, and Vishnu can never fall from grace, regardless of his actions, as everything is created and governed by Vishnu. Therefore, I can confidently say that even though Uttarakhand is not authentic as it is not a part of Valmiki Ramayana, it played a crucial role in garnering more respect for Lord Rama. The individual who authored the Uttarakhand for Ramayana was undoubtedly in favor of Lord Rama and was a devoted follower of him.
Thanks for the videos ... 👌👌❤❤
Simply great!iin kannada Hindi etcit was so exciting that the meaning of some of the sanskrit words are clearly known
Great initiative
Shri Gurubhyo Namaha 🙏🏻
Thankyou for your work Anna ❤
This series ' Buddhi ' is something will be a game changer for your channel , it should be focused towards breaking myths and bringing the sanatanis of all castes together , Sadhuvaad to the punyaaatma within you
Pranam 🙏🕉️ Jai ShriRam🕉️🙏
Amazing contribution by you bro.
Good one! Along with content, ur voice looks clear, deep. Keep it up!
Jai Sri Ram 🙏🏼🚩
This project will bring all lineage together
Jai Shree Ram 🙏 🕉🙏
మీరు తెలుగు వారు అయినందుకు చాలా గర్వంగా ఉంది. మన తెలుగు వారు ఇంత లోతుగా శోధించి, మన హిందూ వాగ్మయాన్ని ప్రపంచానికి సరి అయిన రీతిలో, ఏ ఒక్క సూక్ష్మ లోపానికి తావు ఇయ్యక, సరళంగా అందరికీ అర్థం అవులాగున తయారు చేస్తున్నందుకు....పాదాభివందనాలు.
🕉️🚩
Hat's off to your efforts and especially i like your voice it gave me courage and to do anything thank you sir thank you so much
This man really needs more subscribers and need to gain more reach ....share his channel to ur frnds and make him grow my frnds
Uttar kand (referred to here as Uttar Ramayan) is not part of original Valmiki Ramayan. It has been added later to satisfy the questions and curiosities of people. The style of the shlokas in Uttar Kand added in Valmiki is also very different to all other kands. It genuinely only appears in Tulsi Ramayan.
God bless you
@project shivoham please colloborate with team prachyam...you can make wonders🙏🏻❤️🇮🇳
Thank you so much 🙏🙏🙏🙏
మీ వీడియోలు అన్నిటిలో వుత్తర రామాయణం వీడియో చాలా విలువైనది నిడివి ఎక్కువ ఐనా ప్రతి విషయం అలాగే వివరించండి.❤❤
Jai shri Ram 🙏
In addition to my previous comment, it also reflects that the whole narrative is very emotionally made decision.
Just like how many of us, who intend to be righteous and idealistic in nature, believe we are in the right path n this is how it will be right.
But, while walking that path, we hurt a lot of those who are not on the same page even if they are right .
May be in the assumption and presumption of us always trying to prove to be right, we too make mistakes.
And sometimes really costly mistakes unaware of what to actually do!
We are always forced to believe rama is a good boy and he listens to people n follows dharma.
How can a good leader just be a listener. Shouldn’t be also carry his own opinions and influence people the right way to think and direct them towards growth?
Similar examples are there in many stories,
Like, Shakuntala Devi and her husband (how she was abandoned),
Later, in Jodha Akbar (idk the exact factual info, but through the movie n some references, how Jodha was questioned and she left home n then Akbar went back to get her when he realised),
So it’s always about a man committing a mistake in haste, or in the fear of society’s failure of judgement that a woman is questioned and punished! For a man to re-realise her worth n purity?
It’s probably the repeated pattern n mistake . May be it’s time to advocate the righteousness by actually giving a direction to the society on how to judge, how to not fear society’s judgement, how to not misguide women to bear the wrath of all the patriarchal forces for her to still prove her innocence!
It needs a severe change before propagating more on how it was righteous at all.
May be the take away could just be, “A man like rama has also committed a mistake, and one must learn to not repeat the same pattern. Atleast rise up and be more bold to face the world together rather than making harsh self made decisions in the name of righteousness!
Rama was spineless enough to not show the true dharma to
the public. Already Sita had done agnipariksha and the public still is questioning her chastity. The public will never learn and will gossip however much Rama do anything about it. Because that's how public are, they gossip and poke into things.
And to implore further, imagine Sita was raped and to take it more further, imagine she got pregnant from that. Can Rama be the real Puroshottama and show to the people that it was not her fault. Even if her 'purity' is gone, it's not her fault and we must take care of the weak and the victims and not push them off like garbage.
He could have showed a new and improved Dharma for his people. As Dharma keeps changing according to time and place, Dharma doesn't have to be a static entity.
Rama was a coward and a fool.
Coward for not doing the right thing. Fool for taking gossip among public seriously than teaching them about truth, critical thinking and empathy.
End of story.
@@slowdown7276 I agree. I wouldn’t like to ill speak or call names. But it’s just not righteous from all the stories we have been listening to.
This story always invokes the idea that only when a woman is put through misery from an external place, a man is willing to do whatever n sail oceans. But if it’s because of him? Is he willing to take the charge? That’s the only answer I’m waiting to know if this story has anything more to offer. If not, it’s not right.
your comments relieved me…yes why to get into that thinking of choosing between praja and wife. Why womens character is always in question. You being so powerful and enormous god couldnt save your wife from Ravan and later question her chastity. It hurts my heart..if a man like lord Ram couldn’t save Sita Ma ..then its better to be self reliant like Sita Ma who lived alone in Valmiki ashram and become self dependent..thats my take from Ramayan❤
Your channel is very informative, i dont understand why it doesn't have enough reach ?
Great work Anna ❤❤
Keep up the good work.
Thank you very much
Jai shree Ram
Keep the channel in English, so it could reach global audience, Jai Shree Ram ❤
Thanks for your videos sir 🙏🙏🙏 Please do a very detailed video on Sundarakanda. . I want to listen on a regular basis and want to apply in my daily life both in personal and professional contexts. Jai Shree Ram 🙏🙏🙏
Thank you.
Thank you🙏
There are some neo Buddhists who are started talking against sanatan Dharma. Plz make to Doc about to show the similarities between Sanatan Dharma & Buddhism.
Jai Shri Ram
I come to your channel to check the facts and to get interpretations of the scriptures. Can you please suggest which Ramayana should be read, Hindi or English? There are so many and I want to pick one which is close to the original. Thank you so much for this channel.
Definitely would love to watch the buddhi playlist.
What very few people do not understand is that Sita-Rama together are the Supreme Personality of Godhead. You can't separate the two. Can you separate the sun from the sunshine? Lord Rama is Shakti-man and Mother Sita is Shakti, you can never separate them from each other. From our distorted perspective, it may appear that Lord Rama has separated from Mother Sita, but in reality it is not possible. From our perspective it may seem that the sun is born from the sea, but in reality the sun is far away and untouched by the sea. Hare Krishna! 🙏
Thank you so much for not adding the background music. My ear used to hurt..
Super, keep going
Thankyou
It seems our Twitter loving Indian people existed even during Ramayana and they protested against Rama and Rama gave in .
Education teacher Telugu, hindi also it history to Store but people elders anchors it's another pension dimension. thank you❤
Bro what is your review on adhipurush movie because they made some blunder mistakes.
I would rather kill myself than watch that movie
Thankyou 🙏🙏
Thank you sooooo much for addressing this in your video's; I have been asking this question to family for years, right. I cannot believe that you could/would watch your spouse, whom you are devoted to burn to death in front of your very eyes. Regardless of Dharma, it is hard to comprehend, they had satvic powers through years of meditation etc., so, I believe, that Lord Rama would have known deep down within, that Ma Sita was completely innocent and utterly devoted to him. Makes me cry just thinking about it, so sad, truly. I will definitely be subscribing to your other channel. Namaste from the UK & JSR!
Nuvvu “ Kaarana Janmudavu “ naayana. You were sent to this God’s green Earth for a reason and you are truly making an impact. There are no words to thank you for what you are doing and what you have done so far to bring the eternal knowledge of our Santana Dharma to the fore and educate millions of people. Kudos Shri Gurubhyo Namaha
thank you Sir. The way you create Buddhi Playlist,
could you please create playlist or a create a video about relationship in time, among each other of various puranasa together ? For example: draw a relationship among [ Veda, vedanta, upanishattu, Ramayana, Mahabharata, bhgavadgita ..and the current Kaliyuga ..] in a short crash course..for many who exploring and trying to find the whole context. It will help for everyone.
Waah !! Also Rama's decision was ryt just imagine a who suffered all those hardships was now made an object of people's dirty rumors and court politics how hurtful must had it been for her ,so putting aside his heavy heart he let Sita get her freedom just so she doesn't become a broken marionette...
*@pikachue602* Excuse me, Miss pikachue602. Don't judge Lord Rama by listening to the ranndom commentary from the internet. Do more research about Valmiki Ramayana before getting into your conclusion... Because according to Valmiki Ramayana Lord Rama never listened to any lies of people. Hence Lord Rama never questioned his wife i.e Sita's chastity. It was the people around Sita who raised question on her chastity because she was going to be a Queen of Ayodhya. And Lord Rama knew that Sita would understand, because, She as the queen has also got the responsibility of the state. Once, there is an image tarnishing question from the public, she cannot play deaf and continue being their queen. Even if the layman's question was answered by Rama and put an end there, there's no guarantee that the same question of Sita's chastity wouldn't arise in the future. Maa Sita understood that the only solution was to give Agnipariksha to prove her right because she knew that the God Vishnu will save her from the fire 🔥 obviously. And thus the fire test was Sita’s decision, not Rama’s. Lord Rama just saved her From the fire.
And Sita's last sacrifice was also not for her own self respect, she was not that weak and helpless wóman that she'll sacrifice herself for the sake of her own self-respect. Sita sacrificed herself for not being able to tolerate the insult of her husband in front of her what he was witnessing from the thankless people of Ayodhya. That's what triggered Mata Sita to volunteer exist from her life to her eternal abode Vaikuntha. Don't forget Sita was an embodiment of a Goddess.
@@jaydutta7711when did she sacrificed herself?
Thanks for clearing all propoganda
Bringing our historical and cultural heritages with easy to follow narratives including proper sloka references, Commendable Job, Hats off to you. Please continue with your great work
Bro please do a video on earth shape in hindu scriptures and planets described by Hindu scriptures.
Difference between the words.
1) bhugol- sphere
2) bhumandal- circular plane
3) bhulokh- plane of existence or dimension.
Each word is used in different places of our scriptures
So please do a video on earths shape in Hinduism.with scripture references
Please clarify this
Please Explain Nilavanti Granth.
Despite everything being explained well in the video, people are still asking stupid questions. Many times the circumstances are such where the difference between righteousness and unrighteousness becomes very less, in that situation Shri Ram took a decision which a common man can never take. If today's young generation is so stupid that they cannot understand this, then it is not the fault of Shri Ram. (The respect for Shri Ram has increased in my heart)
I don't know whether Ramayana is true or not, I maintain a neutral viewpoint between theists and atheists. But after reading Ramayana from beginning to end, there is no doubt left in my mind about the character of Lord Rama. I respect Shri Ram and will always do so.
Can this content be obtained in Hindi?
Ramchandra never left Sita according to Valmikis Ramayana
A salute to your analysis of Ramayana. Rama was Dharmatma and he followed Raja dharma and abandoned Sita who was pregnant without even telling her. This act of Rama was not an injustice to Sita? If Rama loved Sita so much why didn't he sacrificed the throne and went with Sita???