Klee Irwin - Is Reality Code Theoretic?
Vložit
- čas přidán 19. 06. 2024
- Join our giving circle for $1/month: quantumgravityresearch.giving...
Is reality made of information or merely described by information?
Klee Irwin, director of Quantum Gravity Research, a group of theoretical physicists working on a unified first-principles quantum gravity theory, discusses ideas relating to the foundations of reality being a code--a geometric language with syntactical freedom creating order and preventing the existence of particles at certain spatiotemporal coordinates.
Link to the paper, "The Code Theoretic Axiom: The Third Ontology" can be found here: www.quantumgravityresearch.org...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Love our work and want more content? Please support our mission, even $1/month helps: quantumgravityresearch.giving...
VISIT THE QGR WEBSITE: www.quantumgravityresearch.org
GET TO KNOW QGR’s RESEARCH SCIENTISTS: www.quantumgravityresearch.org...
READ OUR RESEARCH PAPERS & PRESENTATIONS: www.quantumgravityresearch.org...
QGR FACEBOOK: / quantumgravityresearch
QGR TWITTER: emergencetheory?l...
QGR INSTAGRAM: / quantumgravityresearch
KLEE IRWIN'S WEBSITE: www.kleeirwin.com/ - Věda a technologie
![Eminem - Houdini [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/22tVWwmTie8/mqdefault.jpg)
Thanks for being real, and putting it in a way that is understandable for normal people.
My brother
For being “real” 🤔
You obviously didn’t understand anything 🤣 what is real ? And what is normal ?
As a physicist, I agree.
No point starting with 300 pages of calculus.
@@noompsieOG 🙄🙂 the linguistic symbol "real" having more than one working meaning, of course
Why do u assume any of us are normal?
Klee... I salute you for being such a great communicator of extremely complicated concepts. Your ability to speak clearly, concisely and comprehensibly on a number of complex subjects is simply amazing. You are truly unique, in my view. Thank you.
Thank you so much!
ditto
I dig the consistent objectivity of your presentations as well as distillation into easily understood concepts. Many people tend to pose theories without indemnification. I'm glad that QGR doesn't make assumptions when explaining its theories and research.
Thank you!
I'm glad you like the consistent objectivity in the presentations;) It's nice to receive your comment about that..and it's true that QGR makes no assumptions when explaining!!
Mind blown! After watching it was like the floodgates to creative reasoning just burst wide open. My first thought concerned the question of consciousness. I just spontaneously thought, why would anyone immediately leap to saying ’if there is a code then there is a meaning and that proves god’ I mean why go to the most complex form of consciousness before we can quantify or describe its smallest component? Of course after this I started to ponder on what that could be.
It struck me that at this moment, I felt more conscious than I had felt in a long time; so I figured that the answer was hiding somewhere in my experience of watching your video. All of the information and new perspectives was definitely a part of it; but even more the way it made me feel.
This led to me trying to understand and clarify to myself, how the the act of watching this video could provoke such a response. Here is my attempt:
The topic of the video is far beyond my level of education, so it is not information that I easily digest. My cognitive process basically started from deciphering basic symbols. I have always had a problem with understanding math; but this time, math became visual.
In my mind I could see how the process took place. It was like I had a pile of Legos in front of me and beyond that I could see a structure in the making, being built by blocks of different colour, falling on top of each other in a specific order. In an attempt to understand where each piece was supposed to fit I started building my own structure; first sorting the pieces in my pile of Legos to replicate the pattern of the structure I saw, and then trying to forsee what the next piece would be. All of a sudden the two structures mirrored each other, but that’s not all. They not only lined up, not only looked the same - they interacted! I could forsee what block would fall next, and thus I could join in on building the first structure. I placed a lego and the next pice that fell linked to mine! The sensation that followed was immediate. I felt my consciousness expand.
The conclusion I drew from this exercise was that consciousness is pattern synchronisation. When I could line up with the pattern, when my own building blocks were reorganised to harmonize with the falling Legos, a new awareness was made.
This way of looking at the process appealed to me. My next step was to try to find the most miniscule symbol and response-situation, I also asked myself if that necessarily constitutes consciousness. For some reason what I visualized now was little balls falling at an angle against a glass surface, through which I was watching. At first one ball hit the surface and bounced back while continuing the fall; then more and more balls followed. At first it seemed chaotic. Balls falling against the surface, bouncing back, hitting other balls, creating a response… but when I turned up the flow, and mentally shrunk the size of the balls to grains of sand; I could see how a self Organizing pattern emerged. A pattern devoid of consciousness.
Then it hit me. That means that code can exist without a conscious code creator or conscious code reader. Just after the thought had popped up I had to smile at myself. When it hit It felt groundbreaking but just a second later i realised that it’s Basic. ”No one believes that a computer is conscious, just because it can read and react to code…” but then I felt another jolt hit. ”True, but you just saw the computer come into existence without a creator”.
I felt a really weird energy pumping within me. I really loved it and wanted to continue asking questions and look for answers. Actually I couldn’t stop it. I knew I had to sleep and switch my mindset to the more trivial questions of labouring for bread and shelter. Pushing the sensations I felt into a box seemed impossible though.
This made me remember how I once learned to juggle. I practiced like crazy one evening without really getting the hang of it, and then I fell asleep. Imagine my surprise the next day when I picked up the juggling set to continue my practice; only to realize that I had learned how to do it during my sleep. This memory helped me to calm down a bit. Perhaps what I needed to grasp the next level of understanding, was time for my brain to play with the Legos on its own… without the conscious mind interfering. Perhaps that will self organise the bits of information into even more wonderful patterns…
Years ago I had the idea that everything we see and do, our external reality, was a symbol of our internal reality. Sort of like a dream but more immediate, where as dreams are more of a future projection or past reflection from a different perspective of symbols who arent limited by external physics. Now, what I have found is that focus on desired outcomes creates desired outcome but, the more focus you have the more the outcome is closer to the desire. Usually around 3-6months for it to start appearing. Then there is the whole jinxing situation, another story. Anyway, what Im saying here is that Ive started to see how consciousness plays a part on reality. Some of it is pretty obvious while others can go unnoticed. Interesting to see some physicists getting into it to explain it in a mathematical way.
I think the tetrahedron is the internal world (thought) and the external world is a grouping of five tetrahedron forming a cube. (although it seems to be many shapes moving around, inside and outside each other while expanding and contracting at the same time) Sort of like for something to exist in the external, it needs to be formed by five ideas.
Cant wait to see what you guys come up with next :)
BellyFlopping wow, that was brilliant! Your comment made my day.
This is great. Really clear, and some of the most exciting thinking on physics I've seen on CZcams.
Thank you, Colin!
Completely agree. A fascinating topic explained brilliantly.
Thank you for this patient and thorough explanation of such difficult concepts. I can't grasp it all, but you have given a powerful framework for further thought. I have no capability in physics so I especially appreciate your careful explanation of current thinking in terms that are accessible to those of us not educated in your field.
Wow, I am impressed. I am equally impressed by your ability to explain, as the subject matter itself.
I would be lost with the associated mathematics, but your ability to explain intuitively is very impressive. To the point even I understood the basic principles behind your reasoning.
Thank you.
Glad it was helpful! Thank you for watching!
I’ve been studying/researching quantum mechanics, neuroscience, philosophy, and other esoteric writings seeking the same answers and it’s so exciting to see it all coming together in a cohesive way with your eloquent theory of everything. The ideas your talking about here are not foreign to me at all and I look forward to watching the progression of your research! These breakthroughs you are making have huge implications and real world applications, and will most certainly usher us into a Star Trek age, as you know. :) Thank you and your team for all you’re doing and are about to do for humankind! (Or technically have already done since we live in only the beautiful, spacious present.) 😊
Same here let's connect on fb or email ? Would like to have a discussion with someone like me 😂
jame conradi email is best I don’t really do social media, Kristen.sotelo25@gmail.com, look forward to some thought provoking conversations!
The unification theory is basically akin to the Hindu concept called "the net of Indra"
TS Yes, I would add that it’s imbedded in many different ancient myths, traditions, and religions from around the world that were geographically isolated at the time of the writings. Interesting they all they all same thing though....
@@kristensotelo4212 yes that is very true, we find very similar concepts in religions. Of course there were some influence between religions & one good example is the Persian influence we find in the Christian new testament - after the Persians conquered Judea & the Jewish people came into contact with the Zoroastrian religion & its concepts such as good v evil, loyal followers are resurrected after death, god will bring his wrath onto the world etc (these are totally new concepts borrowed from Persia & incorporated into Christianity), but even so, it still doesnt account for the host of inherent similarities we observe across all religions. I think a good example is also the construction of pyramids we find in cultures that had no contact with each other & yet so many built the same structures.
Ive come across multiple theories as to why this is & perhaps the most plausable ive seen thus far is the theory that humanity is actually older than we think & did in fact survive certain mass extinction events with people being seperated due to natural disaster events causing them to form new groups, migrate & possibly try to perpetuate historical knowledge through religious concepts, structures etc. The recent discovery of Gobekli Tepe totally transformed our historical knowledge of humanity & it was discovered just a few years ago. We are still unearthing our history to this very day so who knows what else we could find & perhaps most importantly, who knows what has been lost & can never be recovered
api.nationalgeographic.com/distribution/public/amp/news/2016/01/150120-gobekli-tepe-oldest-monument-turkey-archaeology
You're a very good communicator
Thank you!
Just found your channel - and really enjoyed this video. As a non-scientist I greatly appreciate your ability to translate your work into a language I can follow. Extremely interesting and I look forward to watching additional videos.
Thank you!
Can never watch this too many times. Never gets old. And every time I watch this lecture I take back something new. In fact I had to watch a couple times before slightly understanding. A lot to take in here and Klee does a good job at leimening it.
Thank you so much!
Klee Irwin is not only a very intelligent man, but above all, extremely brave to dare to go to the farthest edges of current science and put in the insane effort of trying to explain what is - likely - possible. I have so much respect for him! Investing his wealth and his time into much needed research which is insanely fascinating to me and a friend, we watch his videos in awe with a beamer that projects it on a wall and then we engage in a discussion that lasts for hours and hours. Love it!
Thank you, Janne!
@@QuantumGravityResearch You are welcome and thanks for your videos!
So essentially we're a self-referential, 3D projected organically regenerating fractal and potentially a comically bad subroutine within an operating system that is sentient but within rules of a 8D crystal sandbox code written by a malicious or bored alien programmer from the future and the past wanting to get a better grade on his programming paper in that dimension. But we created them, or will, once we become aware of them, and then they'll have moved on and it will be a movie by Ridley Scott.
I love to listen to Klee speak. So articulate. I wonder constantly about the nature of reality and I'm so glad he does too because his ideas are profound.
Thank you! So happy you have been enjoying!
Reality is a probablity system, conscious intent modifies the otherwise random draw from the probablity within it's natural uncertainty. So, it's not determanistic or random. It's a simple loop at the smallest scale: Next state is current state modified by conscious intent operating on the random draw from a probability wavefunction within it's natural uncertainty. And at large scale you get statistical results and that's why everythng seems solid and objective.
The reason why C is a constant is because it always moves exactly 1 pixel each itteration of the inner loop. if you think about the simulation speed:
Δx = 1,616199e-35 meters (planck length)
C = 299792458 meters per second (speed of light)
Δt = Δx / C (speed = distance over time)
Δt = 5,3910595709515814437199751035765e-44 seconds
(our simulation speed, asuming Δx = planck length)
For me your comment is a great summary. I am right now reading Tom Campbell's My Big TOE (Theory of Everything), I recommend it. I don't know if you know about it, but it's totally in line with your comment. Regards !
Yes, it's Tom's model !
Great Shaun ! Thanks for letting me know. Are you participating in Tom's teachings other than the trilogy and CZcams, like video chats or in the physical seminars?
Well, after searching for many years, I stumbled on MBT. After reading the book and watching many of the lectures I found that it did explain many of my questions. Then I fought with it for about 3 years trying to break the logic, and I still do that. But so far nothing has even put a dent in it. Now that there are (QM) physics experiments pending we will have to see how that goes, but if they produce the predicted results then it will be no less than a paradigm shift in our understanding of reality. In the mean time MBT has already been a personal paradigm shift, as I have gathered my own experience of it, it's daily value is immense. But I still look at many alternative theories like the QGR, I feel they are all converging on the same model.
So, I do like to participate in facebook/youtube convo's. I don't feel the need to go to the seminars nor do I have the time for it :)
All right Shaun, thanks for your comment. Yeah, lets hope that someone conducts the proposed experiments as soon as possible, and sure enough, the results will be shocking, one way or another. I am more or less in the same path, but I guess behind you for what you say. I hope your search of other alternatives brings you closer and closer to what you want to know and be. Best regards and thanks again.
Since (assuming) information is entropy and entropy is the missing part of energy after it went through a cycle of exchanges, therefore information is not energy but rather 'spent' energy, and reality is 'spent' enegy.
Klee, you've done a great production with this very clear and concise presentation. Your thoughts about consciousness experiencing NO TIME due to the speed of light are interesting. I theorize that the death of the human body causes the soul/consciousness to experience NO TIME as well. Until the point at which that consciousness incarnates again... and again, through multiple dimensions.
Death, physical death, is Just an illusion. Consciousness is eternal. Whether you get grouped with the angelic or the demonic, after physical death, is the real story. Be careful what you choose in this life. It's not only a classroom, but it's also a test 😉
This is the best explanation of "Life the Universe and Everything" that I have ever watched. Congratulations on a superb exposition!
I was able to follow the logic pretty much all the way through. I have written several simulators (virtual machines) for testing/debugging purposes and so your arguments about "meaning" hit home particularly. Simulators can only have any meaning if everything is inclusive and self referential. Efficient code is what it is all about from an evolutionary standpoint and it seems you have nailed it. I can't wait until I hear more.
Really excited to see more people getting on board with taking these kinds of ideas seriously. Oh, the times they are a changin'...
Hi Klee, I'm going with "described by information". Also, consciousness. What if, everything in some way was conscious? Even space-time. I need space-time to be the observer of gravity to get rid of the notion of dark matter. Then space-time is a "participant observer", which for me is what consciousness means. Perhaps I'm wrong to equate consciousness, but should we not attempt to tie down what consciousness is first? As ridiculous as this might sound; maybe zero should be replaced with the notion of consciousness. I can't think of anything that can really be described by zero, except the origins in our coordinate systems. One cool aspect to no zero is obviously no singularities. But consciousness? Phi? It's there but why?
Very keen to hear your explanation for gravity.
WOW; what a magnificent teacher!
incredibly fascinating , I really think that you are on to something with your work. From what I've learned regarding quantum physics over the years, this real feels like you are connecting the dots from all different parts of science.
Thank you for trying to explain your work in laymen terms.
That was something of a tour de force. May the force be with you. Time to decompress . . .
Wow, fascinating work, I hope it does unify and with time fitting in nicely too.
There are no words that can convey the sensation of being. We just are.
This is a wonderfully cogent explanation of the latest thinking in quantum mechanics and our search for an explanation of everything. Enthralling and accessible! Thank you Klee. Thank you QGR.
Ok, that was pretty epic. I'm surprised I made it all the way through; the discourse was very clear. Thanks very much!
I think the sole fact that random number generators are effectively impossible is proof positive the universe is not random.
This is one of the most interesting videos I have come across! This is an invitation to see a new interpretation of quantum mechanics with the mathematics of quantum mechanics representing the physics of ‘time’ as a geometrical interactive process of energy exchange. In this theory we have an emergent future unfolding photon by photon that forms the ever changing world of our everyday life. With classical physics representing process over a period of time as in Newton’s deferential equations.
Could the Universe is based on one geometrical process forming, what some people call a primary code or reality code that forms the exchange of information that everything is based upon?
I think this guy Klee is awesome. Seems very intelligent and articulate. Very good at conveying the idea to someone like me, who knows a little but not much. Thanks for the video!
you are an amazing speaker, able to articulate such complexity with ease. I admire you a lot! I know you will discover incredible things and share them, for which I am excited!
Thanks, Susannah!
The fact that you know I exist now is pretty exciting. I know...groupies. I really am excited. If your ever in Sonoma County speaking, please let me know...I would love to come hear you.
Excellent job! Mind blown! Very well presented. Hat tip...
I love this video dont shorten it!
Klee, you are great at explaining things that so complex and deep. It is very enjoyable.
As a fruit grocer I'm proud to say my stacked oranges are GR-E8!
I wonder what Klee would experience if he took 4 g of dried psilocybin mushrooms
Shh we need him where he's at, there's enough religions already 😂
Oh my God, this is beautiful! I have not been excited about anything the same level as I am excited about this one for a long time. It is just so elegant, it feels and smells just right. I really honestly do hope that this will lead us somewhere. Will be following developments very closely. Thank you for the video and keep up with the excellent work!
Thanks!!
Wow! I can’t get over what an incredible and amazing job you did at explaining this! Spectacular!!!!!!
Glad you liked it! Thank you!
The dampening and amplification of corresponding wave function is something i never really thought of until i viewed this video...
up, up, down, down, left, right, left, right, a, b, a, b
Really excellent job of explaining a lot of deep concepts that I still don't fully grasp, but maybe understand a little bit better now :)
Klee, I enjoy your talks on these subjects as I also search for answers.
Thank you, Juan! Happy to hear you're enjoying!
Fascinating... thanks for your work. We need you.
Much appreciated!! More to come!
Great video. I have a question? You say that unlike string theory, there is no need to invent or create other dimensions right? But then why do you need an 8 dimension crystal to cast a 3d image we can see? isn't this theory also dependent on additional dimensions for it to work? That part confused me and if you or anyone can help me with that would be awesome. I've watched your vids dozens of times and I'm starting to put it together. Thank you so much for this.
It blew me away when Klee linked the E8 lattice to the Fibonacci sequence (Golden Ratio). I did not see that coming and was a pleasant surprise.
Fascinating and inspiring. Can't wait to see where the research leads.
If you've watched this video and still need more science, check out our new film Hacking Reality!
czcams.com/video/vJi3_znm7ZE/video.html
Is there an 8-dimensional "engine" behind our universe? Join Marion Kerr on a fun, visually exciting journey as she explores a mysterious, highly complex structure known simply as 'E8'--a weird, 8-dimensional object that for some, strange reason, appears to encode within it all of the particles and forces of our 3-dimensional universe.
quantum gravity research? hadnt even heard of or thought of the concept. diving in the rabbit hole now. very curious. adios
Funny thing is, on psychadelics (psyllocibin,lsd,DMT) sometimes you get visuals that can cause super symmetry, like looking in a mirror, your brain can not comprahend which half of your face it should take to symmetrize.
Sometimes it causes you to see mandalas similar to E8 with the naked eyes. The geometric shapes shift and move like four dimensonal objects, while the shapes and colorings that make up the crystal/mandala, represent information of your preception.
Weird stuff, only learned about quantum mechanics and sciences after i took shrooms. And the similarities are uncanny.
His description of emergence was excellent. And while there were many "mind blown" moments, my favorite is at 21:00: the likening of the organization of single celled organisms to create a complex organism with higher consciousness to a collection of single human consciousnesses to create a higher human consciousness. Then I thought of "herd mentality" and wonder if collective consciousness is something that is already happening whether we are aware or not. We may not reach a useful/practical collective consciousness until we create a unified collective consciousness and remove our petty individuality.
Excellent explanation of what this is all about. Can't wait to hear more.
There is quite a lot more. Check out their channel.
Fabulous stuff Klee! Must be so exciting to be part of a team working at the frontier of such a fundamental knowledge. Do you need a software developer in your team with great enthusiasm and love for mathematics and physics?
Ive taken various psychedelic drugs like Psilocybin, DMT, LSD etc. I always see the same geometry & it just seems to flow out of nowhere. This brings up a question, is this geometry real & we enter a new conciousness thus allowing us to perceive it OR is it just a chemical reaction bringing forth what is already within the mind? Regardless of the answer, both are equally amazing to think about. If it is just a chemical reaction there is so much more to the mind than what we can comprehend
I thinking about the same. Its interesting
Have you ever seen a sparkly connective net in front of you on DMT??
:-) This might be the best description of reality i've ever heard. This is mind blowing wonderful stuff. As a psychedelic, this concurs with my intuition about reality, perfectly. It's provided the structure for what i feel. Thank you so much. Amazing stuff!
In no way understood a lot of it, but I absolutely what they are researching and love this channel. I will show this to my students. Who are coders :)
Best summary of current quantum theory and closest to a theory of everything I've ever heard, read or seen.
Mind blown ... thank you!
Glad you liked it! Thank you for watching!
Love watching your groups work, kind of fills me with wonder that from our place in math and philosophy gives us the ability to probe beyond our limits. Though I'm hoping that our eventual findings aren't going to lead to Mymosh the self begotten... Thanks for following up on this and showing folks what you see from your perspective!
Wow that just unified everything in my entire existence and brain thank you Jeff you’re amazing communicator love you brother
Jeff?
This stuff is mind-blowing. Extremely interesting.
Agreed!
@Greg Jacques Lucifer's Jizz Gargler - so says the expert ;)
This is music to my brain and heart and ears
dylans voice no one has the theory of everything yet, and all we can do is speculate, so atleast we can appreciate trying to come as close as possible in this present time to define a theory of everything, one step at a time closer to the goal, it’s an adventure, we should stay openminded, yet skeptical like you, and not let beliefsystems and ignorance stop us.
As far as I know entanglement in large scale systems decoheres. Without having had a look at your research, may I ask for a reference to get me started. What sort research may encourage us to think in such a fashion?
Amazing video! I came here after watching the video ok What is Reality. Your explanations really helped me to reinforce some of the points from the other video. I can tell you've really thought this through and I hope your research proves especially fruitful.
One thing to note is that the color science of this video is really bad. It looks incredibly bland on my phone and computer monitor. Someone should really fix that...
how'd he do this whole 1 hour 18 min speech without notes or cuts in recorded, damn
"The Force" from StarWars! i always thought the same thing!
and also with you.
You are amazing! So clearly described, thank you!
Thank YOU!
This is definitely going in the multi-view folder. Really fascinating.
Reality is a reflection of how we define everything. The reality that we define does not therefore exist outside of our mind. So what is real? Reality is a concept. Real is a concept. These are words in our vocabulary. Perceived reality reflects our collective understanding. It only a collective understanding because we educate our children to perceive the world in 'generic terms'. What exists beyond our collective understanding is as limitless as the potential for our minds. All the great sciences and technologies were created in the mind before they were created in the world. However, the motor vehicle is now real. Its a reflection of the mind. Reality 'does not' exist outside the mind.
Don't use the word random as the opposite of deterministic. The opposite of deterministic is nondeterministic. Random is a group statistical property.
yeh. so true its not "random" even though the quantum foam may appear so. like ripples on the ocean making peaks and troughs, collisions, whirls etc. but at the core each point particle interaction of causality in a complex structure mkes up the slices of momentum and energy of points at a given time. have enough slices can predict what can happen, but these orders of thermodynamics and rules apply to closed systems If I'm not mistaken. in most cases its not closed systems so you cnnot attribute certain properties.
Well we don't know if the universe exhibits deterministic complexity or if it's non-deterministic. Cryptography tells us that regardless, you can't tell the difference beyond a sufficiently high computational bound. We certainly do observe randomness in quantum physics but we don't yet get to know if that randomness is the result of deterministic or non-deterministic laws.
Amazing, this really seems to be the way to go for a unification theory. Congratulations!
Amazing - one phrase sums it up -" Its crystal clear!" Of course it leads in my mind to a ton of further questions but no doubt some of those will be answered in due course because it is clearly work in progress.
The hypothetical exclusion of God led to the remarkable progress of modern science in the past three centuries. But emancipation from clerical dogma was gained by the price of accepting one paradox: The exclusion of the transcendent is itself a dogma.
Irwin explains a way, to ease this paradox out, by saying: God may or may not exist - it simply does not play a role for science, God will never deliver an explanatory advantage because in the end science will ask: So, why does God do this, and how did he came to existence?
Can you write an illustrated book? I don't quite follow
Those ideas are so plausible that they have to be true, even if mindblowing for m'y little brain, but im sure that together we can handle that ;-) im so enthousiastic to live this period and will follow the break through attentively ! Thanks Sir and the Team, long live to your/our ideas
Very well explained, thank you! Regarding how large a self-organising system of consciousness can become - it would be everything, since consciousness must always relate back to the physical - as above, so below.
Scientific Awakening
Science today is addressing the issue of axiomatic philosophy, of what energy is, by acknowledging the possibility we exist within a non-deterministic or deterministic reality - in order to progress understanding.
The general consensus, within the community, is for the non-deterministic position where energy is: information that facilitates the holographic universe.
Put simply ... science is aware there is a physical and non-physical aspect which is described by the Theory of Relativity and Quantum Mechanics.
The study of black-holes has shown objects (within the singularity) break down to their two-dimensional nature as the information reverts to the non-local state - when light cannot collapse the wave-function.
This made science realise the universe is holographic in nature because a hologram is created when light is used to create a three-dimensional image on a two-dimensional surface.
The two-dimensional surface, science has been studying, is the Relativity / Quantum Physics upon which light has the function of wave collapse - and that is facilitated by a conscious observer to create the three-dimensional hologram we inhabit.
This "holographic reality" is animated which means it is more sophisticated than any hologram we have created - but the basic principles are the same.
This is why science is (now) suggesting an eight-dimensional crystal lattice is being projected into the two-dimensional surface.
A hologram requires (cohesive) light, such as a laser, to be split into two in order to send one beam directly to a surface and the other beam onto an object which is projected onto the same two-dimensional surface to create the three-dimensional image.
Science is effectively attempting to describe the apparatus that creates the holographic universe, when they speak of eight-dimensional latices, because the crystal is the object that is "projected".
What does this mean?
Well ... to start with - science hasn't even begun to acknowledge the animation properties of the hologram which means they are ignoring a fundamental aspect of reality.
The wavefunction of light is fundamental.
More importantly ... they are struggling to appreciate the importance of the conscious observer - because they are aware it gives rise to philosophical axioms that undermine progress.
Technically speaking - science is telling us: if every conscious being was removed from reality - all of reality, as we know it, would disolve away.
...or would it?
If there is no creator, who exists beyond this reality, there would be no conscious being to facilitate the wave function - so it would disolve away.
They tackle this by saying the universe is a conscious entity - which is (basically) idolatry - and, as such, it self-organizes the coding to sustain the holographic nature of realiity.
Since the scripture has described the holographic nature of reality, from the position of a being that exists beyond space-time, this highlights the importance of "subjective" consciousness.
...which we (all) have.
Science is, essentially, describing the cage we are imprisoned within, when it speaks of the holographic universe, so it may be wise to consider why we are here.
The eight-dimensional latice, science speaks of, is also referred to in scripture as garments of glory - which means the spirit (personification of attitude) within the three-dimensional body has an eight-dimensional body being created as the spirit grows.
This is not a philosophical nor a religious position but it is axiomatic because the scripture confirms we live by faith.
This is because we can only be trustworthy if we are faithful - such as a husband and wife appreciate their love is founded upon trust and faithfulness.
Love is when the light is cohesive.
The hologram suffers malfunction, such as entropic decay, when the light is not cohesive - so it is crucial to appreciate: the spirit needs to grow before it can secure the garment it needs to exists beyond this reality.
Of course ... this is assuming one wants to receive their garments - or else: they can avoid asking why to continue asking how?
My Best Wishes To Everyone
www.white-flag-publishing.com
Yea more people should be reading this comment
Nonsense
@@ck58npj72
Actually ... the video is seeking to make sense of the available evidence (they acknowledge).
The fact you don't understand it - doesn't give you the right to assert your own ineptitude.
I understood it - so I am in a position to explain why their observations are in error.
Likewise ... if you can't make sense of my explanation - I suggest you return to fifth grade education.
Thank you Klee Irwin. Very revelatory and somewhat well organized. One organizing feature of your talk that I believe to be misguided is the inference that consciousness might choose to use humanity as a tool to increase its scope over the cosmos when it has already done so. The remaining task of consciousness might be to revel in its exploration of the mixing of the two domains of separateness and unity. As humans we are to proceed with the task. Onward.
The idea of this is jaw dropping to me.
For my entire life (I'm only 21 so that's really not that long), I've DREAMED of being able to represent reality virtually with more than just classical physics and definite states (like keyframes in animation for example).
However, if you ever tried to make a game, you might realize that having deterministic states like that becomes very static and confusing.
How do you represent abstract and complex relationship with only 3d space?
The answer is, you save the game states in a higher dimension.
That way, when someone plays the game, they are the observer seeing only 1 deterministic outcome.
So regardless of it's implications to REAL LIFE, this amazing idea has already immensely helped me with representing phenomena in VIRTUAL LIFE.
i hear you...
Wow I believe we are all one and many
@@waynebrindley8156 it is primitive man who gives life to his reproductive offspring.
It is neoman who gives life to his SIMULATED OFFSPRING.
The neocortex hungers to reproduce through thought
I find it hard to focus on my passion of theoretical physics with all my high school classes (French school has alot of work)I have almost no time during the week any tips?
We'll never get to see what's behind the "Curtain" as long as we believe a person's skin color, gender, or sexuality is a determinant factor of their inherent worth as human beings!! It is of paramount importance that as we progress in the sciences, that we progress in human compassion and understanding. The universe will not allow us to spread our hatreds, trash, and ecological destruction into its infinite realms!!!
Collective Conciousness are you there?
This message took 11 months to reach us, but yes we are always here.
This..... was awesome, thank you guys.
[Solo]
Very interesting speech. Thank you!
I hate string theory and I love this. No one is ever going to prove string theory but this, I have hope!
At least someone explores new ways of thinking to explain our reality. String Theory with its 11 dimensions appears to be just a construct to fulfill a mathematical requirement but fails to explain reality
So hypothetically, if this is all cogent, then it very neatly explains crop circles as geometric symbols representing themselves, sort of the same "pi" number sequence thing like in the movie "Contact" but only with the Golden Ratio, written in rye and wheat.
What is Klee Irwin's take on Amit Goswami's theories, in particular, his notion (and book) of the self aware universe?
So...are we actually a universal consciousness experiencing itself subjectively?
I'm not sure where, but I once stumbled upon conjecture: "Consciousness is a way for the Universe to observe itself"
Probably ir was said by Carl Sagan
It would be cool if you guys made a visual comparison of DNA versus the quasi-crystalline spin network.
As my ol childhood friend would of said .!~ Fasinating!
He described God without using the word, interesting.
No Adolf, he didn't. Sorry
Your maths might be good, but your PHILOSOPHY determines everything. If one has no idea what consciousness is, how can one reduce it to fractal amounts? How can one assume that it emerged? How can one even determine that it is reducible at all? Every one of the basic ontological questions posed in this video posits matter as the origin, creator or birthplace of Consciousness.
There is another ontology that more closely adheres to Occam's Razor. *The Consciousness Only Ontology.* The ontology which posits _That All Matter And Energy Emerged Within The Field Of Consciousness. That All Reality exists _*_Within_*_ Consciousness._ That Consciousness is the ultimate all permeating all suffusing reality that totally envelops all reality and organizes (not according to the dictates of humanity, but more for his observation) all atoms, forces, energies etc as they inter-relate accordingly. The consciousness only ontology insists that all physical reality reality is merely the dance (or different vibratory expressions) of Consciousness. We posit that Materialism has reality in reverse or upside down...our paradigm is unapologetic that:
*_THE UNIVERSE EMERGED DEEP WITHIN CONSCIOUSNESS...NOT THE REVERSE._*
Yes. And sweetest part is that you can directly know it beyond any doubt.
You're very goode at explaining things !!!!
Consciousness defines, not creates, reality. Thus, it defines what is real. Reality changes as consciousness develops.
Reality is both random and deterministic. A timeline is a purely spacetime Newtonian path that complies with causality and it is thus deterministic. Yet, different Newtonian timelines can criss-cross and one can pick up a different timeline according to the level of consciousness. The intersecting points may appear, at first glance, random but the decision when to shift timelines is defined outside spacetime and, again, has to do with the level of consciousness one is at.
I suspect that the use of language is totally deterministic, causal, but free will is outside spacetime and depends on the consciousness level or focus one is at.
It can be said that consciousness is like a field, unbounded and continuous i.e., it must spread throughout time and space. Therefore, everything is conscious, from the simplest structure to the most complex e.g., from a quark to a galaxy and beyond. Yet, conscious does not necessarily mean self-conscious. One can simply say conscious means being aware (again, not necessarily being self-aware). Consciousness implies perception and reaction, both according to a pre-programmed "code". The level of sensing and reaction can be expressed, mechanically in degrees of freedom, which is equivalent to degrees of consciousness. A mineral can "sense" a change in properties and react (mechanically, chemically). A photon can sense a change and react, and so on. Increasing degrees of freedom means becoming more aware of the surroundings and of itself and it is equivalent to accessing a more complex pre-programed code until one starts to become more self-aware and free-will begins to develop. Seth talks about consciousness units, which may be analogous not only to quanta but also to degrees of consciousness.
Consciousness does not spring from the laws of physics or from any theory; consciousness creates theories.
Discover = Dis + Cover = remove the cover. Knowledge is analogous to consciousness, a field unbounded and continuous. All what scientists and inventors do is to dis-cover what's already everywhere
As shown in a paper, we teleport all the time without being aware and without technologies.
If space and time were collapsed, everything and all would be packed together; there is no distance. Time and space represent a way that energy is coded so if space were secondary, it means that is also primary, which means space is a translation. Our minds interpret part of energy as space, thus space can also be translated in another form.
this documentary has my vote
My girlfirend had this same theory while on LSD !
Is space-time not affected by gravity? If it’s affected by gravity how does it impact the reality of consciousness?
Space time is affected this would b the black hole where space time and light is effected by the extreme gravity of the black hole
joseph smith : a conscious dark hole (black hole) becoming (emerges) a biosphere using all the information that might be conserved as quasi crystals?
Wow! I know this is too much skepticism and pardon me for asking this but based on your explanation can the
"2 D CROP CIRCLE QUASI STRICTURES" be an advanced geometric message from a higher dimension? Can that be possible?
To me, this theory seems very intuitive, as if ive always known the world according to these rules. In trying to describe it to others ive been unable to explain it as clear as Klee. I wonder what the rest of the current theortical physicists think of this languge.