The planes I WANT in War Thunder!
Vložit
- čas přidán 15. 04. 2024
- This video has been a long time coming, and took a long time to make! Here are just some of the aircraft that I think deserve to be in the game, instead of the more modern tech we get with each update nowadays. What vehicles do you want added to this game?
Subscribe for more!
Support the channel on Patreon:
/ thesnazzycomet
Join the Discord:
/ discord
#warthunder #history #warthundergameplay #warthundernews #aviation - Hry
This video took a lot of effort to make 🥱 hope y’all like it! There is also now a part 2 out now:
czcams.com/video/Gmi655Y7t14/video.htmlsi=ZHgXZwXiJ1ZYWJXz
I liked your stance on the fictional aircrafts, i mean after the F-16AJ gaijin opened the pandora box of fictional aircraft, if they added that why they cant add paper planes and even mockup planes or even unfinished ones? as long as they are accurately represented. They can even add a puprple box (or any color) to them like the green box of squadron vehicles soi they will be marked as paper planes and they can even exclude them for some gamemodes if it bothers people or add an option for people that doesent want to see them on sim for example.
@@StrayGuard perfect
Just with the opening clip I had a feeling this was the case - you got a new subscriber lol
@@KennithBcringe its from the movie strategic air command - its not bad if you want some rare aviation on screen
I love this kind of content and I'm subscribed but can you PLEASE change the music I just don't like it out of WT itself
Calling them ‘paper planes’ as they never left the design process, is actually a rather clever idea
It’s not a term I coined sadly 😔👊
"Paper Aircraft" has been a term for a very long time ever since War Thunder added Japanese Jets that never flew.
@@FutureFlash2034 it’s a rather clever idea
i wonder if the term came from how people call german ww2 blueprint tanks that were never built 'paper panzers'
@@dinosatayThat’s another term that’s used but instead of paper panzers it’s paper tanks.
Oh if they did actually add the B-36 Peacemaker, people would lose their minds (Both positively & negatively).
Kneel in the presence of the Goliath.
It’s a shame, we all know gaijin would slap it at 8.3 bc hahaha big bomb!
@@blu5021 even though they put pe-8 at 4.3
@@Domthebomb664it’s a WW2 era bomber. It would be like moving a jet to 3.0 because it has 100
pounders.
Parasite fighters and motherships game mode when?
2 turning, 2 burning, 2 smoking, 2 choking, and 2 unaccounted for.
That dude in the beginning is me anytime anything that isn't a bird flies over.
Especially Helicopters.
God, I love helicopters.
I love helicopters but hate when they come near me as a drone pilot. A few days ago when I was shooting some video for a class a few military helps flew over and since they didn't show up on the flight radar websites I didn't see em coming until I heard em and then saw em if my quadcopter was in the air I'd have to land it ASAP so it didn't hit em, and also staying under 400 feet is good for drone pilots to do cause it's the law
I love autism
The B36 had one other superlative: it carried biggest conventional bomb by weight ever carried by an aircraft. This was the T-12 Cloudmaker, a huge 43,600 lbs (19,800 kg) earthquake bomb more than 25 feet (7.6 meters) in length..... and the B36 could carry and drop two of these monstrosities in one sortie.
Gaijin when?!
Oh no bigger mininuke
@@IgiSzyThat thing would like, actually clean up a quarter or half a map (say for example Berlin, Advance to the Rhine, Eastern Europe)
Ground players beware, it is trolling time.
@@epicstormchaserswf lol the sp cost to deploy it though XD
Bro wants THE BOMBER update 😂
Well, I really want to see is a “timeline “game mode, where instead of playing with planes by battle rating, you play with the aircraft that would exist during a time frame. Of course, this would mean stuff like the peashooter going up against BF 109’s and zeros but I think would be really interesting to see how you would play the game or how tactics would change if you could only use vehicles that were actually fought against each other.
I think that would be a good idea for a campaign. The game already has campaigns but they’ve been largely ignored and are bad.
If the B-36 was added, it’d be fun to see if Gaijin had the balls to also give it the T-12 cloudmaker
you know they wouldn't
Gaijin please 😢
@@thesnazzycomet 42000lbs is quite a bit larger, but would open the door to things like MOAB and the British 22000lbs grand slam, give big bombers a purpose again aside from being cannon fodder for jets
@@tangohotel2599 if they do add it, it's going to be pure evil.
Wouldn’t adding these bombs make enemy players treat you like a nuclear bomber? (Everyone targeting you all at once)
5:37 The B50 was also the first bomber with electric control actuators instead of hydraulics for control surfaces. My maternal grandfather was an electrician/ foreman in the late 1940s at Boeing's Wichita plant and worked on this and the B47 Stratojet.
That’s amazing!
Plus both the B-29 and B-50 actually had electro-mechanical computers onboard to assist gunners in aiming
The only problem is, there are a lot of planes for Russia that haven’t been added, I would argue more due to the Yak line being too decompressed. We’re missing things like the yak 140, 151, 130 for top tier and the Tu 128, 28, 160 and 95, as the tu line isn’t really fleshed out either and a lot of Cold War stuff has been skipped over quite severely
Gaijin: sure we’ll add them. Let’s just put the b-52 as a premuim vehic-
150 in your region's currency
B52 with the 20mm Vulcan in the tail would be crazy
Or the quad 20mm
Would need to find a way to give it defense against missiles tho
I assume you mean more defense against missiles than chaff and flare
@@itmejac6945The B-52 has chaff and flares, and the tail gun is radar directed so it basically had its own CIWS. In particular, the B-52H was the one that had the 20mm vulcan. All B-52 models have/had powerful ECM suites. You can't shoot down what you can't lock onto.
@@majorborngusfluunduch8694 trust me I wanna see it come to war thunder, I just feel like they would need to rework air rb
There was soo much development through the 50s and 60s. So many aircraft (and tanks) gaijin skipped for some reason. It was really disappointing back a couple years ago when they started pushing more and more modern with every update. We sat for years with only first and second gen jets, and as soon as they started to add 3rd gen stuff every update was a huge jump and now we are well into 4th gen. They could have been was more incremental and balanced in how they added vehicles
In my eyes they should go back to rank iv v and vi to make more planes there
With stuff like the F-15 and F-16 they're breaching into gen 4.5
The one I want to see the most is the Me-263, basically a "Super-Komet" which was technically further in its development process than the Ho-229
To fix the bomber problem, Gaijin could add a bomber focused game mode. It could work where player bombers spawn with player escorts on a large target rich map. Interceptors all spawn on the ground and the objective for them is to just eliminate all bombers with reduced awards given to killing escort fighters, thus making them play the objective. Escorts need to kill intercepers with reduced rewards for ground kills. Bombers need to hit all targets, if they do, they win, if they are all shot down they loose.
Fighters could be offered one respawn if they have other aircraft in their lineup. Bombers dont get a respawn and the BRs could be changed up for this game mode to make most bombers face guns rather than missiles or air to air missiles could just be disabled. There could also be a last ditch option where if a certain amount of time passes and the match is nearing its end, missiles become active.
the F-16xl would be really cool it was on the brink of being the most produced modern jet ever but it just wasn't.
Although I don’t like top tier this addition does make sense
f-16 with more maintenance and more drag
i agree though
@@thesnazzycometAgreed
I'm a fighter jock now, but I started as a bomber pilot in War Thunder. Back in the day bombers were respected, and the pilots actually worked together. I remember not long after the B-29 was released my third game in it was a down tier, and my B-17 brethern were so jealous lol. I struck out on my own as i had performance to die for, but most of those B-17s made it back to base. We won that game, because the fighters did thier job, and our gunners got a few kills.
Games like that is what War Thunder is good for, CoD but with tanks, planes, or ships is just not very fun. I could play War Thunder all day if I didn't stop myself. Now I can barely play 30 minutes.
Also I really want them to add the rest of the F-111 family. That being the D, and F. B would be a neat event plane, or squadron plane. E is a sidegrade to the A so it isn't really needed. D can potentially get Aim-7s, if Gaijin uses the same logic they used for the Yak-141, as well as some Smart bombs. The F is just a strait up better A. Sans the Aim-7 from the D, it has much better engines, and could use all of the 1990s Gulf War bombs, and Sidewinders, including the AGM-130.
There are 3 American "paper planes" that I'd like to see added to War Thunder: The XB35 Flying wing, its successor: the YB-49, and the XF5U Flying Flapjack. I feel like the XF5U could work as a premium/battle pass vehicle around 5.7-6.3. As for the bombers, they could probably work at around 7.3-7.7. All three of these designs were actually built and tested.
i wild love to see the YB-49, such a cool aircraft
All planes I’ll be mentioning next time! These are technically not paper planes as they were built and did fly - all the more reason to fly
They xb-35 and 49 were both made and tested
@@spencerwalker254 XF5U was built too. It just never flew
Why would you have the flapjack at 5.7 let alone 6.3?
Its super slow, has no weapons and is not a very good climber
I see no place that it would fit in
Adding “Paper planes” would be amazing for top tier as nations like Germany lack actual aircraft they used but have a decent amount of unbuilt designs.
Adding basically fake vehicles is silly when there’s still so many holes to fill with aircraft that were actually built
@@danpurcell404 for Germany, they only have the F-4F ICE, a few Eurofighters, and F-35. But adding vehicles like the EADS MAKO, MBB Lampyridae, TKF-90, TDEFS, and other stuff would allow top tier to not be a swarm of F-35s
@@user-xb1tz7mu2y Im not sure about adding planes that havent left the drawing board, but Im all for adding prototypes for Germany such as the EWR VJ 101 or the VFW VAK 191B
@@sharkquark6252 I wanna see the EWR so bad in war thunder
@@jaszczur6379 yeah then it gets into a BS rating where it'll either curbstomp or be utterly useless. no inbetween
B-36 is absolutely unbalanceable. It’s bigger than 2 bv238s and can carry 4 F-111s worth of bombs while still being very fast and heavily armed with 20mms. Would get eaten by missiles but would basically end every single game if it gets to the airfield
anti air would be happy to finally be able to shoot something tho, it might be big and deadly but there's a way to fix this, increase the player limit in ground rb (ab) and air rb (ab), might be weird but come on we can't leave that beast out of the game, 7.3-8.3 looks great for it where strong spaa exist and also jet fighters with missiles, problem fixed both ways
More players isnt needed at all. It would be largely fine at 8.3 or 8.7 - it isn't fast enough to outrun the jets at that BR, and for GRB it would be too cumbersome for any kind of precision bombing on top of being too large to fly low without being the easiest target known to man. And AA at that BR would also be able to handle it without much issue - it's not like it can evade gunfire even if it sees it coming.
@@Tobias-wb6kd alright let's keep in mind that it's a big bomber with jet engines (kinda) and 8.3-8.7 seems slightly overkill for it but what if that br is for air rb but when you switch to ground rb with it still in your ground rb line up the br for the b36 changes to 7.7 or something like that idk but I probably know why you chose 8.3 for it and it's because it carries 2 mini nukes on it but it's not impossible to balance, just tricky
air rb alone would just be a death sentence because the entire enemy team is gonna be drooling their way towards you so maybe add new game achievements with quite a high reward (2000 sl or 5000 sl) for protecting this specific bomber or just escorting it for at least 2 minutes (ofc staying reasonably close to it to earn the game achievement) because that thing will be a pile of junk without anyone protecting it, it's a literal magnet for enemies and even if it has 20mm turrets, they have missiles and fast firing guns plus a strong jet engine in the back powering them towards you at high speeds
@@LoLs167 Not all B-36s had the four jet engines. The A and B models both did not include them. It is important to remember that the B-36 was designed during the war to suit an intercontinental strike capability if Britain were to ever fall to the Reich.
Thank you so so much for mentioning the FJ1-Fury I feel like it would be such a good low tier jet and just fun to fly as it’s so small and early design
The 50s-60s was an interesting moment in aviation history
If we were to get some of these big jet bombers, then I think that every tree that don’t have any already should get a few jet powered bomber interceptors that would also be cool to see in the game
F-106 with the AIR-2 Genies would be wild
Make the B-36 THE nuke aircraft. It’s the perfect “oh my god” silhouette right before you end the works
Honestly I'd love to see "1946" aircraft to fill up Axis aircraft trees some more as well as those for the Allies too even if they are paper designs I like interpretations and am completely for it, and I absolutely agree that the early Cold War was the Golden Age of aircraft so many designs that need to be added, as a Canadian I'd love to see the CF-100s, CF-103, CF-104 and CF-105
Yes the Canuck! I can’t believe I didn’t mention that
I want the Republic XF84H Thunderscreech. It doesnt have any armaments but you will make anybody within a 25 mile radius deaf.
Psychological warfare
One plane I've always wanted is the p-6e hawk, it was an interwar biplane. I think it just looks so sleek.
Looks cute! More low tiers would be welcome
I want infantry and a sandbox mode where u can spawn as a tank, bomber, or ship and just play around with the lil guys as they’re shocked at seeing a fighter jet or smth
You can kill them too
So much video and so many planes, all I see is pure unadulterated PEAK! YOU COOKED BRO, AND THAT INTRO CHEFSKISS
Thank you kind sir! I’ll get working on a sequel!
@@thesnazzycomet LETS GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! Go out and cook bro!
We also need the YB-39, which were some experimental B29s but powered by 4 turbocharged Allison v-3420s
14:03 Kurt Tank emigrated to Argentina in the late 1940s, and went to work for FMA. There he perfected the Ta 163 design as the FMA I.Ae. 33 Pulqui II. It never got past the prototype stage, but it is a better plane than Tank's original design.
I would love to see the EF-132 Zerstörer. Its as big as a B-52 and looks incredible while also being rather simple as well for a jet bomber that could've served well into the 90s with modifications and development like the BUFF
Yeah, the Ju EF 132 would be a great addition. Unfortunate it was not built, though the Russians made close derivatives after the war. Though, those would end up in the Russian tree which is annoying. So if they add those, they may as well add the EF 132 to make it fair in game.
It's a pretty tough balancing problem to solve with the heavy bombers (B36, B52) as others have mentioned. A lot of them were designed far before missiles were a threat, but by the BR logic they would likely have to face them. It's another MAUS balance problem, except possibly worse.
It would be neat to see them added simply for historical purposes, maybe just in a separate sandbox mode to showcase them, but that's a bit of a silly idea.
The one I'd like to see more is the B-58 Hustler, it's light enough to not have as many BR issues, and could be interesting if implemented well.
F-94 would be a really good addition, it of course has a lot of upgrades from the F-80s. but to summarize it's an F-80 with an Afterburner.
If war thunder didn’t remove enduring confrontation this would work almost perfectly
Out of all paper planes i would love to see I-153 M-90, it is a 1941 proposal to equip Chaika with 2 machine guns, 2 cannons and 18 cylinder M-90 engine, which was at the time in development. It had estimated top speed of 590 km/h in level flight
Due to evacuation and delays engine was only completed in 1943 making 2080 hp in it's final form, but it was never installed on any aircraft.
Another one would be Yak-3M, which was made by Yakovlev in 1992 based on the late ww2 blueprints for all-aluminium Yak-3, that didn't make it into production. 12 were auctioned off as a civilian planes and were equipped with 1300hp Allison engines.
If the b47 has a bigger bomber payload then the f111a aardvark which has a 33,000 pounds of payload, then I can say gajin would a hard time balancing out that vehicle
I think that gaijin should add the thumderskreetch (totally team based as it has no guns but you could fuck up sound and use it like a flash bang but sound and it would get kills when someone died while being affected by the sound)
The suggestion of the paper planes I agree with as there are many aircraft for many countries that could be added
3:22 It wouldnt be hard to balance if gaijin invested into reworking the gamemode, they dont even have to think of something new, just make something like world of warplanes and most of problems will disappear.
Expand: how do you mean?
@@thesnazzycomet In war thunder we have a basic team deathmatch and a ticket drain. There are objectives but nobody ever tries to complete them (in air RB) since there is no incentive to do so, and this on top of the anti ai bias of gaijin wich forces us to engange in pvp even with bombers.
In world of warplanes There are marked and dynamic objectives suited for the role of each plane, it feels like a balanced rock, paper, scissors but with planes. Eevery plane has its role, and the hearth of it are the well designed bases with individual targets that ground attackers must destroy but also the bombers can go and destroy the whole complex. This kind of base also gives a place to the high payload bombers for whom gaijin struggles to find a place in the game.
It also adds to the experience that there are defending ai planes flying over the bases so there is a need to estabish air supremacy so the ground attackers can do their job (this in contrast to war thunder in wich you compete against your team mates for kills).
The ai in world of warplanes also helps to have an action packed gameplay with no dead times like in war thunder that we can fly even for 5 minuts or more without dooing anything.
@@StrayGuard Dam my guy, i am a developer & i have to say your making a very good point.
@@M0vingSaturn523 Thank you, I tried my best to explain the problem with air RB and how to fix it. I wish this reached gaijin.
I want it to be the Ultimate Bomber update where we get alot of more bombers, flying boats and other piston aircraft that should be added into War Thunder. I'm all for Paper planes in War Thunder so fight me.
I’d say that the b36 would be foldered under the b29 around 7.7
But I agree with everything that you said that should be added
planes that should be/adding in game:
Jet Seaplanes:
Saunders-Roe SR.A/1 (Britain)
Martin P6M SeaMaster (USA)
Beriev Be-10 (USSR)
(could be battlepass or premium planes.)
jets:
Folland Gnat (Finland/Sweden, Britain)
Fouga CM.170 Magister (Finland/Sweden, Israel, Germany)
Ilyushin Il-28 (Finland/Sweden)
BAE Systems Hawk (Hawk Mk.51, Mk.66 Finland/Sweden. 2-3 different versions for Britain)
McDonnell Douglas T-45 Goshawk (USA) almost same as BAE Hawk.
My list is:
Props:
Boeing XF8B-1 (USA)
North American AJ/A2 Savage (USA)
North American T-28D-5 Nomad (USA, T28F version for France)
Grushin Gr-1 (USSR)
Myasishchev DBV-102 (USSR)
Tupolev Tu-91 "Boot" (USSR)
Ikarus S-49 (USSR/Yugoslavia)
Loire-Nieuport LN.401 (France)
Sud-Est SE.100 (France)
EKW-36 (Germany/Switzerland)
Jets:
Douglas A3 Skywarrior/B66 Destroyer (The absence of this plane confounds me) (USA)
North American XF-107 Ultra Sabre (USA)
Vought F7U Cutlass (USA)
Avro Canada CF-100 Canuck (USA/Canada)
HAL HF-24 Marut (UK/India)
SNCASO SO.6020 Espadon (France)
SNCASE SE.5000 Baroudeur (France)
FMA I.Ae.33 Pulqui II (Germany/Argentina)
Ilyushin Il-40P "Brawny" (USSR)
Ilyushin Il-54 "Blowlamp" (USSR)
Mikoyan-Gurevich Ye-152A "Flipper"
Chengdu J-9 (China)
@@petergray2712looks like I have some work to do
Lots of these bombers would be fine in Simulator. I want to see the J-10 and I probably will in the near future. Also the Ohka would be funny addition for Japan, like give it an airspawn and an extremely low repair cost. They could add kamikaze mechanics with it.
They'd have to put it on a plane it probably couldn't fly very far so many a modification
The Ohka is more of a human guided bomb than it is a real plane. A last ditch attempt by Japan to get a reasonable conditional surrender out of WWII. It like all other kamikaze attacks were the ultimate Hail Mary, plain and simple. I would much rather see it as a human guided bomb for Japanese bombers, which would for sure set it apart from every other guided bomb in that you lose crew members by using it.
13:23 This Plane gives me Fallout Vibes
I'm very skeptical about heavy jet bombers and never built stuff, but some of these not being in game is absolutely criminal lmao. Early US Navy jets, B-50, B-45, Spiteful/Seafang, P.1011... good list
Thanks man! I think the B-45 not being here is most criminal as we have medium jet bombers already
Probably the only "balemced" stealth plane they could add to warthunder is the F-117, as it doesn't have a radar, is subsonic, and can only carry laser guided bombs.
I'm sure people would consider it's literally useless, but it's would be nice to see later down the line with more modern jets
Nightmare to fight in grb, barely useful in arb.
Grb, outside of few mouse guided missile it would be ok impossible for most nation to kill it (althougheter), while the mouse guided missile would still have hard time finding it and hitting it.
Arb: unless it is at less than 10.0 it would just get jumped by plane with guns/ fox 2, in less than 10.0 its speed would make it a decent plane(but at that br the likelihood ot it fighting radar guided missile are low(unless in UPTIER))
japanese: “we have plane built around bomb”
US: “goblin”
i myself would love to see the thunderscreech
I’d be perfectly fine with adding paper planes to the game so long as they’re labeled as such. Maybe a new “prototype” or “unbuilt” tag so more casual players don’t get confused into thinking these things were actually built
Yes Please a Pt 2. I Also agree with your choices.
I don't even play WT but I got recommended this video. Absolutely loved it, keep up the good work!
means a lot man! Hope it was interesting :)
The archive footage of these planes was awesome. It's funny this is about a video game, but I've learned a ton about planes that I've never heard of before.
I knew the B36 was big, I didn't know it made a B29 look like a fighter
If they ever allow paper planes, then I hope they can add the Italian Caproni Campini Ca.183bis, as it wasn't just a paper plane, and was at least partially complete. Plus the design is very unique, and I love mixed propulsion planes (Soviet Su-5 is also an interesting one that was actually fully built)
Interesting planes I never heard of!
I’d love to see an Su-37 in the future as an event vehicle. Although hopefully with an actual good flight model unlike the butchered Flanker 😔
Every aircraft on my list was in production and saw combat. AVIA B.534, PZL P-24G, PZL P-37B, PZL P-23B, Fokker G.1A, Rogozarsky IK-3, Fairey Battle Mk.I, Bristol Blenheim Mk.I, Blackburn B-24 SKUA, Blackburn B-25 ROC, Boulton Paul Defiant Mk.I, Fairey Fulmar Mk.II,
I would add the Focke-Wulf Fw 187 Falke while not in production, supposidly saw combat anyway.
9:08 I’ve seen the exact same planes in this picture, like the literal ones in the photos, all of them, at the NMUSAF, I’m glad to not be absurdly far away from it.
i wish i could go
while i love paper planes that never left the prototype phase i fell if they were to be added gaijin should make it so you can toggle it so you don’t have to verse it & also have their own line so you don’t have to unlock them if you don’t want to.
That is a good idea!
A good in-between with people who don’t like paper planes and do like paper planes in game is have them in an a event.
Bombers should have their own gamemode in my opinion. Heck I'd love to see more game modes for all types of vehicles
Imagine how insane the B-52 would be in Ground RB.
Seeing how gaijin will probably never rework air rb, I feel like a better fit would be the Valkyrie. The only bombers that can survive are fast bombers like the yakovlev 28 and the thud, just because they outrun everything at the br. Even then the thud suffers because it sits at 10.0 with no flares.
If they add the Valkyrie then the TSR-2 can be added for Britain
If they added the b 36, it will probably end up like the b 29/tu 4. Suffering to the hands of jet fighters and potentially high repair costs.
Pretty much any bomber in this game is useless/gimmicky
@@Cuteseals2At least in lower tiers you won't get aim 9b'd. Some bombers are still deadly, like the g8n, il 28 and ju 288.
McDonnell XF-85 Goblin would be fun at 8.0 BR. Republic XF-84H Thunderscreech would be fun too if Gaijin gave it the Horten 229 treatment (adding offensive armament) I live close by to where the first one was displayed for many years. I never thought they would add the F-5G/F-20 Tigershark, something only of my dreams as I had seen the one example with my own eyes in the California Science Center, but they did add it to War Thunder, so I have hope that those heavy bombers would make it to the game eventually. However, I have lost interest in the game heavily after the addition of the Tigershark.
you know what I really want to see B-36 in game
Honestly i think everybody agrees with you, i sure do! Thank you so much for including those german prototypes in the video, especially the Me P.1101, a personal favorite :) I think making videos about those aircraft definitely helps, hope we can get them in game one day! +1 Subscriber
B- 58 Hustler would be interesting
I cant agree even more with what you said, there are so many vehicles like the ho and maus got added, why so quick to gen4 or even 5 fighter jets. They really left some beauty behind
They make so much money with top tier premiums as people rush to get the latest gen 4 jet. We will have to be very patient to get stuff at lower tiers. I'm still waiting for a single damn british light vehicle at top tier whilst russians are getting vehicles not even in service yet IRL.
Because nobody wants to play bombers except for people who barely or at all play the game.
@@freakmusicaddict Escort would be nice, so you have a job to do in match. Bomber are nice!
@@Itswinever7 Okay you can go play sim and escort AI bombers. Also your job is to kill enemy planes.
ngl, the b47 is probably the most iconic aircraft on this list - at least for me
There are so much bomber to add like:
Avro Vulcan
B-36, B-47, B-52, XB-70, B-1B
Tu-95 Tu-22, Tu-160.
B57G would be fun, a canberra with laser guided bombs. There is also the pave gat variant that has a 20mm vulcan turret in the bottom center of the fuselage
I'm surprised they haven't added FACs/observation aircraft. I would absolutely LOVE to fly a Cessna O-2 or an OV-10 Bronco and just spot things for my team. That'd be fun as hell. Let them be light tanks in the air with an instant or near-instant cooldown on their scouting function and marker rockets.
I’d like that
2 things, A) the reason gaijin won't add most of those, mainly the American aircraft, is cause most nations *ahem* America, would get way more when they already have more, and B) I already know you've never flown a ME 262 if you think their around 7.7, they are quite literally among the worst in game jets, mainly because of their 30 second turn time, and bullets that only move at 500 M/S, for example, that's slower than most tier I tank main rounds, and the spread on the guns is monstrous.
Preach bro
thought it was general knowledge that the 262 is ass at turning and the 30 mills are glorified supersonic grenade launchers
I was thinking of the better Me-262s, which are 7.7
oh, ye there is no 7.7 but the last really should be, there's 1 at 6.7, it 50mm one, 2 a 7.0, the bomber and first fighter ones, 2 at 7.3 being the one rocket booster one and the added 20mms one, and the 8.0 which is the 7.3 rocket booster one with no difference but at a higher BR other than booster placement.
one that i was surprised that you didn't mention was the b-58 hustler witch i think would be good at 9.0 even tho it dosent have countermeasures
We need PRB and PAB. P stands for paper. Think about tanks or planes you can research after finishing a tier, or get after some events. Just think about a battle where Ratte is fighting against K9 or any other paper/fantasy vehicle. Of course balance will be broken in favor of *fun* but this is why paper battles may exist.
I absolutely love the B-36 and B-47, my two favorite planes. Grew up watching the strategic air command movie and literally have every single toy / model of the planes. I would literally download the game again just to unlock those two if they were added
One plane I desperately want to see is the Fokker G.I (G1) it played quite the role in 1: defending the Netherlands against the German invasion, and 2: development in tail gunners for some twin boom aircraft. They would fit in the Swedish tech tree either as a normal or premium aircraft, as they were multiple in service as reconnaissance aircraft and dive bombers (S 13 and B 26 respectively). They could also for into the German premium line as some were captured and used as trainers, even though they were very capable fighters. All in all I think it would be a great addition to the game and a good way to represent some of the lesser known aircraft of the war.
i've never heard of the B50 before. That thing sounds like a monster
Great list, I would love to see the mig 25 in game as well
Can’t add paper vehicles in game because the stats would have to be purely hypothetical
I`m missing the Yak-25. It`s somewhere from the same time period like the Yak-15/17 and Mig-9.
I love large planes, I wish they would add more super size ones like the B36
I was talking to my friend the other day, I was saying a new branch of aircraft could be used for a new ground troop game mode(enlisted pretty much), these new aircraft would be cargo aircraft where they can drop supplies or have paratroopers in them. This could also allow for helicopters like the Blackhawk, Huey, chinook. Sea Stallion, etc. You could use spawn points (like in ground realistic) to get planes, tanks, helicopters, and more. I say more because maybe they could also add transport vehicles. Anyway this is my opinion for new planes, yes they come with their own mode and that’s why I said all this.
I want Super Tucano, an Attack Turboprop prob sit at 7.0-8.0, the most modern versions can carry AIM-9L too, probably this one at 9.7
Playerbase: can we have more enormous cold war soviet era bombers
Gajin: we added the f-69 child obliterater and another object variant
The Ki-64 would make a really cool higher tier Japanese heavy fighter
The Italian Re.2007 would have been lovely in the next vid
This is one of my favourite videos of yours. Who doesn’t like the golden jet age??
Just imagine you're climbing in a mig 15 and you see one b 36 and two b 29s
End of the world 💀
an american arado counterpart at 7.7 would be pretty cool to have in game
I don’t think the peacemaker will be added because on paper it will be a good idea but in game it would be horrible trying to balance bombers is hard because of its stats
new game modes!!
I just want them to add moder strategic bombers like the B-52 or the Tu-95. But for them to work, Gaijin would have to completely redesign how air RB works and that would mean that they'd actually have to do something which I don't see them doing.
I will admit, I don't want the Japanese tree to grow any bigger (minus the bluewater fleet, that can keep getting more ships) the reason why I play Japan is becuase its small and I do like their vehicles.
However, if I was to add any new aircraft to the game. I'd like to see the G3M "Nell" and the G4M2E-model24-Tie. Which differs from the current one. Which to be fair Ive heard is a bit of a mixed bag.
This has radar, new 20mm defensive weapons, armour for the flight deck and fuel tanks. It also carried the ohka (which could be fun) and had flares/chaff or whatever. They used one of those 2 during night engagements to mess the radar guided guns which to be fair it did work. I think it would be funny to use against radar and missiles. "Oh look a ww2 japanese bomber, lets hit it with a missile"
The bomber flares/chaff "haha!!!"
Another aircraft is the fw200 c-4 which differs in defensive armement (15mm and 20mm guns) and though I don't think it ever did. Give it the Hs 294 for funzies.
AND FINALLY, the martin P6M Seamaster, becuase flying boats, with jet engines. It, in typical flying boat fashion can do a shit ton of stuff. In her case its torpedo bombing, ASW, bombing and being amazing:)
I want the gunship C47 just because I want to be able to fly that beautiful plane. And also the flying pancake would be pretty funny to have.
Flying flapjack should be added to dreams do come true section like the tog and sturmtiger
Honesty id also want to see the PA-48 Enforcer in game, which is basically a child of the A1D skylark and the P-51
I would love more turbo props. The thunderscreech would be cool, although, i highly doubt that gaijin have any plans to implement it.