Fact Checking RFK Jr on All In Podcast | I break it down
Vložit
- čas přidán 6. 05. 2023
- Vinay Prasad, MD MPH; Physician & Professor
Hematologist/ Oncologist
Professor of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Medicine
Author of 450+ Peer Reviewed papers, 2 Books, 2 Podcasts, 100+ op-eds.
If you want to contact me, do it here: www.vinayakkprasad.com/contact
Google Scholar: scholar.google.com/citations?...
Substack: vinayprasadmdmph.substack.com/
Podcast: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
Personal Website: www.vinayakkprasad.com
Laboratory Website: www.vkprasadlab.com
Podcast Website: www.plenarysessionpodcast.com
Academic Publications: www.vinayakkprasad.com/papers
Follow me on:
Twitter @vprasadmdmph
Invite RFK on to debate the childhood vaccine schedule!!!
Or even better, a series of debates on the whole schedule and the individual vaccines (or some of the ). Give each other the papers you’ll be citing ahead of time, so they can go through them.
That would be such a great service!
That would be great. You can’t ignore the studies that don’t support you point when someone is there to defend them. Vinay was on Dr Drew with Dr Kelly Victory and he refused to consider any of her valid points though, he is a little narcissistic
@@tdcaudio I just heard him say the toxic placebo is no big deal because if something was there we would have easily been able to spot the safety signals!
Correct me if I’m wrong but those safety signals, even if they were the worst in history, would pale in comparison to the lighthouse-earthquake-monumentally explosive signals occurring this very instant, right?! I mean somehow ‘public health’ figures around the globe are missing 100x the signals and this is right out in the open. How on earth does he think a safety signal a fraction of that would be caught and doubly so, during a period when the vast majority of the public, like myself, thought there were intelligent and thoughtful people running things
Great suggestion!!
@@gretchenk.2516 Secretary of Health is not an elected position...
RFK would clean his clock czcams.com/video/IfnJi7yLKgE/video.html
His main point about vaccines is the liability waiver for manufacturers. We need to eliminate that.
I am surprised Vinay did not catch that.
And especially that FDA is not *actually* regulating the big pharma vaccines in trials and is helping coverup the side effects.
czcams.com/video/Wv5AZseNbLQ/video.html
It's a US law that affects only US victims. Australians, for example, can in fact sue the mfrs...and let's watch to see if they do.
agreed. it also seems like his main complaint was that BK wasn't specific enough but that's easy to fix. Just have him on your show!
These studies need to be evaluated one by one. I looked at a HCQ study which used crazy high toxic doses (8400mg total over 3-4 day course) when it’s well known to not be effective beyond a 400mg per day schedule.
On top of the that, MANY Ivermectin studies don’t start administering the drug until at the late end of the virus’s replication phase,& they intentionally weigh the sample sets towards the back end of course scheduling, when the drug is absolutely being given beyond the replication phase. And those studies always use a criteria for entry into those studies that require 2 or more symptoms, rather than 1 symptom from a PCR test. The studies seeking the extra symptom(s) again always delay the administration of the drug by at least 1 day, which is critical when using any protease inhibiting anti-viral drug. They also always weigh the sample sets towards the back end of the schedule rather than the front end. Again, this is done for obvious reasons; weighing the effects towards the late portion of the drug’s administration when it’s being given beyond the viral replication phase.
How much does the above matter, and is it known to those running the bogus trials/studies? Yes, it absolutely does, and yes, they absolutely do know. How do I know? Well, it’s as simple as reviewing the trial conducted on Paxlovid, which is also an anti-viral protease inhibitor, and which was conducted & used criteria/scheduling/weighted sample sets that were opposite to those used in the IRV studies/trials. Why? Because they knew it was the best chance to show actual positive results for Pfizer’s patented crap version of Ivermectin & HCQ. Btw, the PAX trial BARELY eked positive results, and yet the world was allowed to run with it, & governments, like ours, spent billions stocking up on it; the U.S. alone purchased at least 12 billion in Paxlovid, never mind that it actually reinfects/worsens up to 50% of those who take it.
Also, the ‘Together Trial’ for ivermectin’s effectiveness had most of it’s funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates’ Foundation, though now their names have been erased from ever being associated to that study which didn’t release it’s supporting data for 7 months post reporting of how it supposedly failed to show efficacy of IRv’s effectiveness, and even after the data was finally released, it was shown to have been missing &/or incomplete with the results given. Some statistical analysis was done upon the data release, and those statisticians proved the missing data was that which would have been positive results, and this apparently was done even with a trial that was orchestrated to fail, as it used max dosage of 24mg, while also using many of the bent methods I mentioned above.
Btw, you do good work, as it’s obvious from reading the comments here that your followers are well informed. Sharing & dissecting information is how we’re able to weed out the bad, and run with the good information. It’s not easy to have to change your opinions & positions, especially when you’re a public figure such as yourself, but you were man enough, and honest enough to do that, and that’s entirely commendable. Dr.Campbell is another whom I’ve followed since the beginning, and too had to do a complete 180 degree change in thinking & position after seeing & actualizing the data throughout the pandemic. Part of that actualizing is to understand & acknowledge the captured Health Agencies & their governments, who’ve been lying to us all along. Given that we’ve seen their nefarious actions time & time again throughout this pandemic, which has been all too profitable for some, isn’t fair to be skeptical of these trials on their face value? Shouldn’t we all put in the extra work to analyze them in depth before making a decision about that they’re concluding to see if they’re on the up & up? I hope & expect you will given your already proven willingness to change when given reason to. Cheers!
What a great commit, very informative and completely accurate.
After this mess, evaluate all of the vaccine on the children's vaccine schedule.
All chronic illness that plegues American's will be laid at the door of the responsible party's.
If You Say is correct, then there should be hell to pay for those entities that fought, yes, actually fought to keep it suppressed
paxlovid isnt ivermectin. its a completely different compound, with no relation to ivermectin.
@@xisotopexPaxolvid (nirmatrelvir and ritonavir), just like ivermectin & Hydrochloroquine, is a protease inhibitor. That is their mechanisms of action as an anti-viral. The differences between Pax & the others is that Pax cost hundreds of time more per treatment (aprox. $500-$1000) & is far less effective than that of the generics. On top of it’s exorbitant cost per treatment, it also has a high reinfection rate; approximately 30-50% of those who take it end up getting reinfected, and have the virus in them for twice as long, or longer, as was the case with both Fauci & Biden, both of whom publicly announced their usage of Pax, and both of whom were subsequently reinfected with covid, thereby extending their illnesses for an additional week.
Imagine buying a product that on top of not working, actually makes your need for a particular utility even greater prior to spending money on the failing product. Even worse than that; imagine having first bought an insurance policy, which then required an additional one, then two, then three, and soon enough seven added premiums, none of which weren’t initially mentioned when you had bought the policy, and then low & behold, the policy & an many additional premiums actually didn’t cover any of the expenses of damages they were suppose to insure. Now apply that same scenario your health & well being, and factor an additional risk variable which has a probability of realization which increases with each & every subsequent premium (booster), and with all that, you’d still be underestimating the costs to your health, not to mention pocket book/tax coffers where these mRNA products, & Pfizer’s Pax therapeutics are concerned.
@@DirtyLifeLoveabsolutely! The 8th & 9th circles of Hell will be seeing a large influx of residents soon enough. I’ll find the studies, or at least a couple of them, I’ll list them here against this comment so others can reference them too.
My wife works at a wholistic medicine practice where the practitioners prescribed ivermectin for treating Covid and patients saw a much quicker recovery.
Interesting. I can see how it might work. But the dosing & timing is tricky. It's a cheap & relatively safe med tho.
What's more important than whether Ivermectin and HCQ were effective was giving people the freedom to make their own decisions about prevention and treatment, including having the right to access these alternatives.
Exactly.
Ivermectin was actually quite effective. The meta analyses Vinay is referring to was cherypicked. If we check all studies its quite clear that a select few is very negative, a other select few are quite neutral, while the dominating majority is quite positive.
For HCQ we see a similar situation but the level of effectiveness is a bit lower.
Zink and Vitamin D clearly works as well. The effect is not huge, but significant. Vitamin C have even a bit lesser effect, but again the effect is not negligible.
Most, if not all of those effect, can be stacked, and there is when you get a significant outcome.
Fun fact, Cannabidol have been done 7 studies so far, with all over negative effect.
@@storkstorm6925 what are said inordinate risks (inordinate being a subjective term subject to a risk:benefit ratio analysis)?
I would like him to discuss the studies (that he is referring to) to dismiss HCQ that used a toxic dose in the trials. The WHO (1979 I think) commissioned a study to define a toxic dose of HCQ and found it was between 1500mg to 2000mg in 24 hours. The studies used a minimum of 2000mg. I would be interested in Vinay's opinion on why they selected such a high dose (a toxic dose actually) in the HCQ studies.
Let's recall that the FDA's ban on using HCQ in treating C19 is based on a completely fraudulent study that was quickly discovered and retracted. FDA was quick to pounce when the "study" hit global headlines, yet never even bothered to review its stance after the retraction.
Vinay.... invite RFK jr on your podcast. I'm sure it'll be a huge hit, and you can challenge him directly and have a debate on the issue. I think it would be quite informative. His debate against Dershowitz was a hit.
Agree.. have him on your show.
Yes
He'll never do that. Vijay doesn't wanna get humiliated in front of his own subscribers
Vinay is not that important
Lol Vinay can't win that. He can only Talk shit in this case.
Vinay, the difference between the meta-analyses of early treatments and those of masking is that, as you have pointed out, nobody has a financial interest in skewing the results of a masking trial to show a lack of effect. You ask, "Who is out there shorting masks?" And that's a good point.
With regard to the early treatments, there was (still is) *massive* financial motivation to get people to believe they were ineffective. I don't know the precise figures for the various companies for the various years, but easily *dozens* of billions of dollars were made in the trade in EUA-sanctioned treatments, which would have been off the table if early treatments were accepted as effective.
So the meta-analyses of early treatments were largely based on studies with a *huge* potential for bias individually. Alexandros Marinos does a public peer review of the TOGETHER trial (which made NYT headlines months before its results were published, for some odd reason), and it (Marinos' review) lays out, in a series of a couple dozen installments, the many ways in which that trial was flawed and unconvincing, if not outright fraudulent. I believe human beings are corruptible, that scientists, as human beings, are corruptible, and that with that many billions of dollars at stake, the potential for corruption is very real.
If all the studies analyzed are biased in the same direction, it's no surprise if the meta-analysis is also.
Why masking? Social engineering. That was an excellent opportunity to see how fast people got in line.
💯
The easons why Bobby is censored, smeared and despised revolves around the fact that he is correct about the vaccine schedule.
the reason is that he's not toeing the official party line. He's a divisive threat and they will do whatever it takes to de-legitimize and neutralize him.
@@juststeve7665 He is diverging from nearly every position that the dems are taking. A "Kennedy Democrat" looks right wing compared to where they are on most issues right now. His appeal to common sense is refreshing.
I knew the vaccine schedule was getting screwy when they told me they wanted to vaccinate my newborn against a sexually transmitted virus that I had tested negative for
@@GregKingston - Which begs the question, why is he still a Democrat?
I thought they censored him because the *BERLIN WALL FELL DOWN*
kind of weird that you don’t actually critique RFK Junior‘s position on vaccines but just the stuff you heard him say on a podcast. You know you could get them on your show in a heartbeat right? I wonder why you don’t do that? Is it because you’re afraid he’ll embarrass you about vaccines? Cause I’m pretty sure that’s what would happen.
Exactly 👍
I love you Jimmy Dore and keep speaking truth to power; your comment is spot on! This Dr. Prasad guy is far too gone indoctrinated on vaccines that he just cannot accept that these mRNA experimental shots are trash and that the vaccines industry in general BEFOR covid has been and still is more than ever to be very corrupt!
Haha, rfk jr is a nut... And not a doctor. He couldn't stand toe to toe with a professional.
Really? Prasad has published a study about vaccines and he doesn't have the mainstream position on vaccines, that you should get every booster. Like he said, young men benefit most from one mRNA and no booster (not even the second shot that's everybody is "supposed" to get). You can find the study online for free, it's called "COVID-19 vaccine induced myocarditis in young males: A systematic review." I really doubt a politician is going to embarrass a doctor who's spent a great deal of time studying the topic.
And why is it wrong for Prasad to check what RFK said on a podcast? Is RFK not responsible for what he says on podcasts? Is it wrong to point out what he's said wrong? Not every correction is a personal attack. If RFK said something wrong, it's good to point it out.
Yep. Doubtful this guy has done a deeper dive than RFK Jr on vaccines.
If you've been alive the past 60 years (1989) you clearly know what RFK,Jr is sharing about chronic disease in our country is true. No mention of our immune systems in this podcast, but then medical training in US was dictated by wealthy families (Rockefeller, Carnegie) invested in pharmaceuticals, investing in universities.
During the first lockdown in New Zealand in April 2020, all swimming was prohibited. It was bizarre. Anyone who went into the water risked getting arrested. The police were patrolling the beaches. That was when I first realized that something very strange indeed was going on
they heighten the fear, hence you had community checkpoints run by locals. "look at those bloody Aucklanders leaving, they could be spreading it, they better not be coming to my town". some excused it, as, well if you get in trouble they dont want to have to be exposed since social distancing...the same argument was for school like school isn't already a cesspool of potential illness, and first responders get exposed to all kinds of sickness. so you can see how they made this "different".
yeah that whole piece is definitely a "WTH?!" thing!! Have people completely lost their minds
Very telling that our govt with billions of $$$ never did RCTs on early treatment with moderate dosing. The I and H studies were bunk.
Almost as though they didn’t care about treating anyone.
No, the claims that Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine are COVID treatments are what were bunk.
@@pathacker4963 lol the idea is to get rid of some excess - not to actually help.
notice how they're pushing "demand destruction" from an economics standpoint? people should do some research into what that actually means lol
Also notice how we are on the cusp of mastering artificial general intelligence (like a future, refined chatGPT) synchronized with dexterous, nimble movement robotics (see Boston Dynamics).
Soon large swathes of the population will essentially be made redundant. Rather than having all those folks unhappy and disgruntled, probably a good idea to start a pre-emptive culling lol
I loved those large planned RTCs, which struggled to find subjects for years, couldn't source I or dropped I arms for other reasons.
You start with the false premise that RFK has a problem with ALL vaccines and then say he wasn't affective in persuading the audience that ALL vaccines are ineffective. That's not what his claim is and that's not what he was even attempting to do.. he is narrowly focused on a number of specific vaccines and I suggest you look more into what his actual thesis is rather than taking at face value what the mainstream media portrays his position to be
yes Robert has always said he wants vaccines to have proper testing and liability like any other drug he has never said hes anti vax
The "antivaxx" smear is the only thing they have on him. It will only work for so long.
Kind of like Prasad has a high bar for proving efficacy, RFK has a high bar for proving safety, and I think that’s totally fair seeing how your injecting these things into otherwise healthy people
It's argument from mischaracterization.
@@justsomenobody889 well said and excellent point.
If the word condescending were a person. Vinay Prasad would be it.
I see Vinay let the way the media has portrayed RFK's arguments to influence the way he perceived the points he was trying to make. Vinay projected onto RFK intent that wasn't stated on the podcast.
Your studio is looking great bro, that big Pharma money really going far 👏👏
Big pHARMa.
RFK Jr is last chance saloon for the United States.
If you think he’s got the wrong policy on something medical, contact the guy. Lend your expertise and clarity of thought.
...and be sure to bring receipts, Dr. P., because he's spent decades reading all the studies, and you haven't. You just did a segment on how it's impossible to keep up with the huge volume of studies published.
@@shsummers I looked into RFK's statements about the 2000 Simpsonwood Retreat's concerns on thimerosal. While RFK ended up making some inflated points, I think the base issues of concerns held some validity. Finding out that we still incorporate a form of mercury in some vaccines blew my mind. (To stifle down the immediate alarm raisers, the original mercury used and was of concern was methylmercury; the thimersol/mercury ones today seem to use ethylmercury.)
I'm also interested in someone examining with a proper approach to the statistics of relevance for the CDC child-scheduled vaccines for risk benefit. We give about 25-32 shots to kids in their earliest years of development, with an overall average of severe adverse events/effects being ~0.1%+ per vaccine, equating to a ~2.5-3.2% severe AE by the end of the schedule.
@@shsummers 100%
@@S3raphicReaper also, compare RFK’s level of research and intelligent analysis to the likes of Biden or Trump … America needs less crazy morons in the White House
Absolutely this. He's someone who could actually restore my faith in democracy, and bring America back in line with the values they claim to represent.
He's the real "great reset". He'd actually "drain the swamp". He could restore what was stolen from America when his uncle and father were assassinated.
10:11 “it’s not going to effect your ability to detect a rare safety signal” - Dr. Prasad says with a straight face while we’re in the middle of the most blatant, in-your-face, ignoring (globally!) of 100x the blinding safety signals verses what he criticizes the lack of placebo control. How can you even pretend these dangerous and incompetent public health officials would even acknowledge a safety signal had one occurred.
Just imagine if ivmn trials did that to placebo groups, you wouldn’t rest until the lab employees were retired the old fashioned way 🤦♀️
You asked RFK Jr to mention “who benefited”. You could take your own advice. Money, power and the new mask religions were all against ivm and the quality mask studies weren’t limited to masks.
This is so so true. He says he has lost faith in the CDC all the time. What does he think CHANGED? It just was EXPOSED. They're the same as they've always been. He can't face the truth.
The double standard is flagrant!
Vinay just got fact checked by comedian Jimmy Dore 😂 it’s good! Jimmy has a hard time ignoring BS.
Wait where is this clip? I follow Jimmy’s Channel on CZcams and didn’t see it
@@morkenane1151 czcams.com/video/xt7MTlZXYBw/video.html
@@morkenane1151- It's titled Garbage "Fact Check" of RFK Jr debunked.
We live in a sad time when comedians and lawyers are trusted more than medical doctors.
I think Prasad contributed to this phenomena. I blame him and people like him for stoking the flames of cynicism and mistrust
@@karenkaren3189 the trust was broken in the medical industry and government slowly over the last 50 years, covid was the straw that broke the camels back
Imagine thinking the jury is still out on lock downs 🙄
u would have been one of those dumb guys even during the smallpox pandemic, under Washington himself...yeah even then people had these conspiracies
The lock downs were wildly successful in their intended agenda; to redistribute a massive amount of wealth from the working class and working poor to the top .0000001%. After that Black Rock bought up real estate all over the country and caused an extreme rise in prices. That is how the greedy globalists roll.
RFK Jr's advocacy on behalf of children is exceptional. His work around exposing Fauchi on Aids, and then Covid is superb. He is head and shoulders better than any other candidate.
Well..... he's far better than Biden/Harris anyway
Any one who red the book the real mr fouchie nos what is going on vinay is so rong
And he didn't knock down the Berlin Wall
RFK Jr's a loon who spreads lies and conspiracy. He's only running to hurt Democrats and help the wealthy Oligarchs.
Spot on 👍
If RFK Jr made any false statements, why haven’t the parties he’s made accusations and claims against taken him to court and sued him for liable? They would in a heartbeat if he was lying or making false claims.
He could be wrong, I am not saying he is, but he could be. The problem is if the parties were to sue him there would need to be discovery. This would mean the other parties would have to forfeit their information as well, and they definitely do not want that.
You answered your own question, I short as RFK Jr has put it, the truth is all the defense one needs if a charge of liable or slander is leveled against them.
Good point
That's a very good point.
Do you know what libel is?
Ivermectin were used widely across India and Japan too, very successfully. In India there's data from CNC one of the most respected medical instruments in India
Ref: Evaluation of Ivermectin as a Potential Treatment for Mild to Moderate COVID-19: A Double-Blind Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial in Eastern India ( J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2021)
'Inclusion of ivermectin in treatment regimen of mild to moderate COVID-19 patients could not be said with certainty based on our study results as it had shown only marginal benefit in successful discharge from the hospital with no other observed benefits.'
@@gribbler1695 who funded that study? How did they reach this conclusion?
@@gribbler1695 I just did a quick google search on Nigeria, they use(these numbers might be somewhat off) ivermectin as part of their fight against malaria and other deseases. Something like 30% of their population uses Ivermectin, yet they have much lower vaccination rates while having a COVID death rate of around 2 times lower than that of the US. It's not conclusive as there's other factors of course, but it is interesting.
@@gribbler1695 Good. So few actually READ the dam studies.
Invite him to come on the show and see if he will. If you do please make it a direct bit respectful dialogue
Dude, you were so wrong at the beginning of the Wuhan virus and early treatment. I remember seeing you on ZDogg's channel and you were so off. Z didn't get it (and for all I know) still is arrogant and clueless. You've wisened up which is commendable.
Watching the Dark Horse podcast really educated me on the weaknesses of taking both peer review and RCT studies without a healthy suspicion of the reviewers/designers/testers/tests/conclusions.
We need a massive reform in tbe academic and scientific community before they are worthy of our trust and respect.
Exactly.
Correct!
You're right to give him some credit, at least he can flip flop when it suits his agenda (getting attention on social media). He's a step above the mentally broken & deranged lefties who have kept doubling down the entire time.
100%.
You’re right. He was soooo wrong. He only makes decision on randomized trials. You dont need a randomized trial to not eat poison mushrooms in a forest if 10 people in front of you die eating them. Vinaj is solid but wrong sometimes
Vinay, I trust you & wish you’d go deeper on the vaccine schedule bc I think he made some good points. If the “placebo” vaccine contains an adjuvant like aluminum, and the aluminum toxicity slowly causes the immune system to spiral and turn to autoimmunity… then how do they tell the difference between the placebo and real vaccine if they both have aluminum? The immune system is complex so it’s not like an autoimmune condition shows up the day after vaccination, it could take time to build. But the childhood schedule is really, really full! Much more than when we were kids. And I’ve yet to find a study that actually looks at how we get aluminum out of our body when it’s Injected into muscle tissue.
Your friend Paul Offit just says things like “there’s more aluminum in our food. There’s more aluminum in breast milk!” But that’s sooooooo misleading because when it’s digested the liver and kidneys filter out 99% of aluminum. There’s really only been one study done in intervenes aluminum solution and the amounts in vaccination go wayyyy over what was determined in that study. So how do we know it isn’t causing immune system disruption? Where is the aluminum going and why are so few people concerned when there are sooo many sick children these days?
I can’t seem to find a balanced answer to this.
Chelating heavy metals (including Aluminum in this context) is not easy. But it can be done. Prevention is best.
Excellent points.
I absolutely love your points, I hope you get an answer!
I wish he would overcome his cognitive dissonance too.. He's better than this..
NCVIA 1986 creating a protected product class where manufacturers can't be sued and taxpayer ends up shouldering liability is a huge perverse incentive.
How do we expect pharmaceutical corporations to act with such incentives? They've moved heaven and earth and spent tons of money and resources on propaganda to convince us to take those products.
I agree the randomized control trials are the answer if they are done properly. They can also be manipulated by by dishonest researchers too, and most people in the public would never be able to tell.
2 more weeks....
Vinay Prasad exposed! Returning to true form: smearing experts! First, Robert Malone now RFK Jr. We haven’t forgotten!
So strange, I've seen credible doctors say the exact opposite about the meta analysis regarding ivermectin
I think this is the choice of measurables on which conclusions are made. I too have heard voices I trust say that the meta-analysis review chose the end points that met their foregone conclusion and ignored the others that showed that Ivor worked.
Also, they are not pooled of all the trials of Ivermectin and HCQ as he said. They are selected, and often not selected for WHEN the drugs were started and what the dosage was. In the studies many were started after the patients were on ventilators already, or given ridiculous doses. Also several of the studies were fraudulent and with suspicious funding (FTX, Bill Gates, etc).
Concerned about our 81-yr-old mother allergic to Everything & had health issues, we siblings (engineer, lawyer, scientist, teacher) explored all the info we could find about the jabs. The more we looked, the more we knew to avoid them. We took her to multiple big events in 2021 (memorial services, weddings, family gatherings, overseas trips to UK, the Middle East, Egypt, etc.) We just kept her on C, D, & iVM.
Especially those with significant personal experience using it for their patients.
I believe India distributed millions of boxes of big D and hydroxy early in the pandemic. What were their results? You could compare states in India that did and did not so that.
Everyone got it and It was gone in a month
Yip. I know that is true because I got heaps of the same packs that the Indian government dished out. There were a few countries where the gov handed out IVM but it was kept very quiet in western countries. Also the countries where these drugs are commonplace seem to have done way better than Western countries without vaccines and other mandates
México too.
@@luceroa3313 someone told me they were handing Ivermectin out at the airport in Mexico.
Your believe if wrong. India did nothing of the sort.
Man this is one of the worst ratios I’ve seen. It’s clear you’ve cultivated an incredibly intelligent community. Hopefully you do a follow up and speak to some of the concerns they are raising and get him to come on to your show.
I've read all his books. It's all sourced and fact checked. He's honest and I can't wait to vote for him.
@mills1540 um, have you fact checked "vaccines cause autism"?
The study that claimed this was withdrawn as a fraudulent study!
Show me the source for his claim that "Covid-19 is targeted to attack Caucasians and Black people"? He later claimed he didn't say this, but these are HIS words, directly from the video of him saying it!
There are many more examples... BUT you have to actually read them to know this.
Honest? His own sister says what he says in certain areas is untrue.
He also makes claims about vaccine ingredients - he rang a vaccine expert to clarify, then the following week ignored what he had been told.
An outright charlatan, and a disgrace to his family name!
It's all bad information. He doesn't even understand what he's talking about.
And since he’s a truth-seeker, he’d be open to consider other arguments (example his arguments on ivermectin.) You’re right, he would go on his show. Wonder if he’ll invite him and if not why, as you said.
@@juneelle370 truth seeker? You mean like the time Kennedy contacted Dr Paul Offit, was given info about vaccines, and then ignored it?
It sounds like YOU have positive thoughts on Ivermectin, despite what the science says? Then you want Kennedy to confirm your misinformation, even though Kennedy is a lawyer, not a scientist 😞
@@kevinscott9745 Keep drinking that propaganda.
RFK jr: we want safe vaccines
Dr Prasad: He said all vaccines are bad
Assuming both statements are true, we can deduce Prasad believes there are no safe vaccines.
The standard vaccines before 2020 were all proteins grown on eggs or beef serum. This is problematic because these farm products are all allowed to contain 5 parts per million of Glyphosate, from RoundUp. As you know, Glyphosate is an artificial amino acid, which can readily take the place in among the hundreds of amino acids in each protein. Monsanto/bayer has never tested their product adequately, and the Regulatory Capture is blatant.
@@zacadomike8093 Thank you for that info.
@@zacadomike8093 RFK junior is super critical about Monsanto and Bayer, Mark Hyman actually did a cool interview with him.
You are not wrong… 😎
I like how u mention pharma ads only 2 country’s in the world allow there ads and were one of them. Banning ads would make media more critical and end there lobbying in congress would make strides I believe
Wow
Banning ads won't have that affect. We in Australia don't allow them but we do follow the United States advice as dictated by Bill & Melinda Gates foundation's so called scientists. They paid the media to be complicit rather than critical of all the human rights abuses.
I Don't think it would sadly as the stakeholders of media and pharma are already the same.
That is a very naive comment.
In Australia we don't have pharma advertising however we are the top country with pharma funding to our government regulatory on medicines. Unfortunately, it seems they still find a way.
Was gonna watch but, thankfully the comments saved me. So proud of all of smart people for calling him out !!! ❤
lol
czcams.com/video/IfnJi7yLKgE/video.html
Kennedy vs Dershowitz
Jesus... please tell this comment is a joke😂 the comments are full of smooth brained abusers of the internet who just want to hear what already believe
After getting the poke I had a stroke... I am 35. When I went to my doctor she told me I should get my booster. I said no. She said thinking those 2 things where related meant she wanted to give me a mental health evaluation to see how I was coping with my stroke.... that is how you shut people down. Not solve problems.
That is totally shocking of your Doctor, especially this late in the game with so much information out there.
Difficult to comprehend that a medical practitioner who is treating patients can be that uninformed and oblivious to what has been going on worldwide, regarding the medication that was forced onto many of us.
I hope you make a full recovery back to good health & find yourself a more informed plus enlightened GP.
That's awful! But I've heard of it before. Some supposedly intelligent people seem to have had any common sense educated right out of them!
Sounds like she's getting kickbacks from pharma.
Horrified for you, I am praying for all like you. Come to Jesus Christ, the Son of God, who at least offers eternal life to His when THESE wicked trials end.
@@staceyforehand9513 Your god is fake af
Also Vinay, doctors were using HCQ and Ivermectin in the dark days early in the pandemic, and they thought they were getting excellent results. This was when people were being told to stay home until they could not breathe. Then they were being taken to hospital to die on ventilators, which were being used quite inappropriately oftentimes. And you and Dr. Ioannidis and others were saying not to give early treatment because there were no RCTs. To me this was therapeutic nihilism. Still seems that way.
Thank you for your comment. I do agree 100°/°. Same in France..
But i am surprised by what you said about Pr Ioanidis. Please could you tell me more about his position.
Have a good day !
That is y I think Vinay has now sold out
Also, they are not pooled of all the trials of Ivermectin and HCQ. They are selected. and often not selected for WHEN the drugs were started and what the dosage was. Also several of the studies were fraudulent and with suspicious funding (FTX, Bill Gates, etc).
Vinay is mostly a good guy, but he plays things smart and pushes the envelope only as far as he can without getting into serious trouble -- serious like losing his job and being blacklisted forever. If he took a fully honest look at ivermectin, that would be pushing the envelope too far.
So agree with you 😥
Bobby already has the best team of fact-checkers and certainly doesn't need these half-baked claims. Just read his book (black cover, white letters) that has 2200 references to solid evidence.
If he wants the change he says then he needs to hold himself to same level of independent review as the pharma industry. If not we risk allowing the same two rule system: one for wealthy privileged and one for others. Vatican, royals, politicians etc have teams of researchers. Knowing the facts doesn’t equate to honesty or integrity. His wife didn’t seem to share his views for a party they held last year. He defended her view after their special invitation request leaked out.
@@jmc8076 Is your criticism that his wife has different views from him? Somewhat confusing comment
Vinay is the one half baked
@@antd8667 Sorry, that's what I meant, Vinay's half-baked claims
@JK-srsly"Dumb actor opinion"? I swear it's comments like yours that are problematic in our community. I say "our" community because I have been "anti-vax" for 13 years, long before this pandemic, and I am married to a working, known actor. Why are their opinions any less relevant than yours. They are just American citizens, who have a public job. They have a right to have opinions just as you do, and they have access to the same research as you do. You have no idea how informed they are or not. You also have no idea what has informed their opinions during their lifetime. So stick to the facts about vaccines and the pharmaceutical industry and stop throwing your negative and hateful jabs at people whom you do not know. It makes our side look petty and ill informed and not worth listening to. Please stop setting our cause back. It's a bad look.
Thanks for this. You havr convinced me that RFK is the candidate that I will support 100%. My colleagues and I have listen to your comments and we're voting Kennedy.
Vinay, Vinay, Vinay.... And to think, I had Good Hopes for you.
The science did not change, it was just not done; right from the start and, we all knew that.
Doc, you are a truth seeker. And you are fair and honest. Please interview RFK Jr. so you can ask him the hard questions and get his answers in regards to vaccines.
Yes,we need that and I would hope that RFK Jr would do it.
That will b the real test if he has not sold out
It would be interesting to see if Vinay's channel were struck for interviewing RFK, Jr. Vinay may know the score at YT and be reluctant for that reason.
@@joyduncan9434he will do it in a heartbeat. He has not been proven wrong. Very disappointed in this podcast by vinay, as this was not at all proving RFK wrong.
read his idiotic book the real fauci, he makes outrageous claim after claim and never both provide evidence.
I would find it very interesting if you were to conduct an interview with RFK Jr. in a podcast format.
Would you consider this?
RFK Jr has made it more than clear his willingness to chat openly....
He doesn't have the balls.
Invite RFK Jr on, in person. And debate this with him. RFK Jr is so well informed and his info is so well documented. Someone (at least one) from the science world should have this discussion with him.
This comment section gives me hope. ❤
We love him and we have nine more months to share his voice with our friends and family
Bobby is not wrong. Have him on your show and have a fair debate. Let the truth prevail.
This
Yes!
He's a lunatic when it comes to his views on vaccines and medicine in general.
I think the guy making these videos knows that. He's just choosing to play unfair.
I love how this guy think he knows info he doesnt have access to
@10:07, I'm not sure if I'm missing something, but why wouldn't the control arm affect your ability to detect safety signals? If I compare a new therapy to a known toxic drug, my new therapy would look safe by comparison, no? Which I think is RFK Jr's whole point, that the adjuvants, emulsifiers, surfactants, etc. are the toxic elements in the vaccines. If anyone could help me understand Dr. Prasad's argument here I'd greatly appreciate it.
RFK was spot on!
You forgot the worst. They closed public restrooms and allowed restaurants and stores to close their restrooms. Who would think closing restrooms was a good idea when we needed people to be able to wash their hands the most?
I see your point but it's not the worst. Shutting down parks and outside areas was the worst.
The did the inverse. Reduction? HA! Someone needs to do a deep dive investigation of PCR test trends in cycles, numbers , times pushed by bribes , times numbers waned. Those tests and the testers were so darn sketchy!
In California, they closed one entrance at grocery stores forcing people to clump up and use only one entrance, drastically increasing face to face interactions
Not that they did it for this reason but the c replicates on mucus membranes and the intestinal track. This is why they do testing on sewer liquid to gauge the level of infection.
What should've been done is a simple suggestion to cover the toilet when flushing - similar to opening a window when indoors. Both were not suggested and were simple and effective to lower infection.
@@truthfuljoe No, shutting down schools was by far the worst.
How about FACT CHECKING our current President ... Joe Biden. That ought be entertaining??? I love RFK Jr. he's got my vote.
Not as entertaining as trump the muppet, buying his own red carpet in Scotland
Can’t see he reply to your comment…
To be fair, he has been very critical of Joe Biden.
@@StuartFerguson55 Does he fact-check and monomaniacal serial liar, Donald J. Trump?
Personally I'm going to vote Joe Biden, especially if Trump wins the republican nomination.
GET HIM ON. LETS HEAR A LIVE DISCUSSION PLEASE
“I’m going to fact check” RFK that put me off right there Doctor. I usually like your commentary but not this time. I have heard alot of expert testimony in court that seemed impressive until cross examination. Then things can change real quick!
The biggest point of confusion for me in all the points you lay out here is, if IVM in particular is so useless in this context, why are a bunch of top physicians continuing to advocate for it? Obviously there's no money to be made from the drug itself, is there some entity that is incentivizing doctors to push IVM? I've learned the very harsh lesson over the last few years that following the money trail will inevitably lead you to the ugly truth, but there doesn't seem to be a profit to be made here? These are honest questions, my mind is not made up, I appreciate all the work I've seen done on this channel 🙏
If vanay looked at the FLCCC protocols then what
I watched Ivermectin first hand kill the symptoms in a matter of 48 hours. IT WORKS!!!
Vinay is mostly a good guy, but he plays things smart and pushes the envelope only as far as he can without getting into serious trouble -- serious like losing his job and being blacklisted forever. If he took a fully honest look at ivermectin, that would be pushing the envelope too far.
I agree with you. I have followed the FLCCC and I believe them over Dr Prasad. They go over all the studies and it’s very compelling.
If ANYTHING worked against covid the EUA could not be granted. THAT is why they blocked IVM, HCQ and vitamin D info.
Without the EUA the whole scheme would collapse.
RFK 2024!!! 💪🏻🌎🕊️
I trust doctors who've used Ivermectin & Hydroxychloriquine successfully for years, & who've had their studies pulled or unfunded by big pharma pressure. To argue that there are no studies supporting their use is to assume a level playing field in accessing trials & publication thereafter. 🤷🏼♀️
& POTUS DJT🇺🇸💜🙏🏾
well, it cant be biden. _JC
👍
When it comes to HCQ and IVM, clinical experience > RCTs
If you can see it working with your own eyes, it is not unreasonable to suspect the RCTs may be rigged.
The study on Ivm by Dr. Eli Schwartz in Israel is what made me say there is something there. The difference? Not funded by those who have an agenda.
I look forward to your future interview with RFK,Jr. You can do the deep dive into the deficiencies of vaccine science with him so your fact check can check facts and not what he wasn't able to fully explain.
I LOVE that RKJ speaks the truth re vaccines (and so much else), and that’s precisely why he has my vote.
Please do more research on ivm, the mechanism - i gave it to 75 people in beginning 60s to mid 80s, all noticed they felt better- no long covid, no hospitals, product works
Vinay is a limited hangout, his purpose is to obscure the important stuff. He'll expose the lies in the narrative that are relatively harmless to pharma profits and he'll dismiss the facts that would really hit pharma where it hurts if they became common knowledge.
@@jonnynice8366 excellent analysis
Along with the Paducah india study where ivermectin was give to 250 million people
Healed my long covid
Was feeling better in 2 days with the Ivermectin.
Vinay's downfall, imo, is that he is SO wedded to the RCT - which CAN BE a very effective tool to find relevant signals, but is also incredibly game-able, and can be designed to hide signals, and to show non-existent efficacy.
He's better than some - maybe even most? ...but he SEES the obvious corruption, but is then willing to completely ignore it when it comes to tallying up RCT's that give him the 'prescribed' answer - that early treatments = bad, vaccines = good.
Quite infuriating.
You said it all! That os precisely it!
Yes, read Bad Pharma. So many bad drugs approved on the basis of fraudulent RCT practices, on a literally industrial scale
First of all, the point of RCT is exactly that it is designed to eliminate biases and elucidate hidden assumptions and confounders so it is actually least gamble. Of course it is not perfect but let's hear a better way. We are all ears.
Secondly VP never said or indicated that he believes vaccine good early treatment bad. You just made it up.
Ever since i know the data stays property of the company and everything is done on a “trust me bro” basis i have no faith in whatever study…If researchers aren’t granted full and complete acces to all data the study is bunk to me..
@@justkiddin1980 Absolutely 💯
I'm a huge fan of Vinay and even pay to subscribe to his Substack...but this was poorly done. Fact checking would be having RFK Jr on your show to debate in real time, in good faith. Please do it.
You don't need to do a live debate to argue against a claim. I'm not saying he shouldn't speak with him or anyone but the idea that that's the only way to disagree in good faith is ridiculous.
I came to the comments just to see how bad y’all we’re tearing this fraud up and I was not disappointed!! Keep it up guys!
What fraud?
7:30 Vinay: you’re too confident in ONE meta analysis. If you include intentionally corrupt studies in the meta analysis pool it can be used to suppress effects of small size. On this basis there is reason to consider the arguments of people who say the alternate meta analysis advocated by another camp should be seriously considered and not dismissed as if one meta analysis answers all questions finally. Maybe the meta analysis author themselves is on the payroll of some partisan in the issue: this is not rare. We shouldn’t shut the book too quickly, but rather consider the meaningful arguments offered by those who disagree.
Vinay will not go deep into Ivermectin as he knows that if he deep dives into Ivermectin or childhood vaccines, and realises the truth, and starts saying the truth, he will be totally shunned by the medical community, including his buddy Zdogg, so he carefully keeps a distance from those two “hot” subjects.
the Fact that he Now Knows how Captured the Government Health Agencies Experts and Regulatory Body is, and how Pfizer and Moderna both (Pfizer Definitely) falsify their Own Studies to Get Favorable Outcomes to get FDA Approval. He then Claims how Well The Vaccines were in the Moderna Trials, "Therefore, savings So Many Lives and Preventing Serious Hospitalizations and Deaths". BS⚠️ Guess What Else Prevented Serious Illness, Hospitalizations and Deaths? Spoiler Alert ⚠️ IT was Covid-19 Itself ‼️‼️
Note : Moderna Not having any Successful Vaccines or Drugs "Approved for the Public" Prior to Covid (If I Remember right). I'll Correct myself if Wrong, is A Company He touts as Reliable?
Vinay is mostly a good guy, but he plays things smart and pushes the envelope only as far as he can without getting into serious trouble -- serious like losing his job and being blacklisted forever. If he took a fully honest look at ivermectin, that would be pushing the envelope too far.
Vinay almost seems to hold RCT's as unquestionable truth. He's so keenly critical about everything else but apparently not on the ivermectin meta-analysis. I believe that many of the studies used were deeply flawed.
+BobWidlefish
First of all, I'd like to point out that you're now criticizing a guy for only relying on one meta-analysis, a study that in itself incorporates multiple individual peer reviewed studies. What's next? If he looks at 5 meta analyses, are you doing to say he chose the wrong ones and needs to include another 5? At a certain point, you either accept a large pool of rigorous, peer reviewed data, or you explicitly tell us why it's wrong and prove your case just as rigorously.
Second, this guy is literally a professor of biostatistics (in addition to being an MD). He's about as qualified as they come with regard to discussing evidence for vaccines (certainly more so than RFK Jr, who is a lawyer and politician, not a doctor or scientist). Furthermore, the fact that he critically analyzes and actually accepts some (but clearly not all) of RFK Jr's points shows that he is not intrinsically biased...
Considering how much money was at stake, it is hardly surprising that study results would discount any use of alternative therapies.
"Alternative" therapies are a trillion dollar industry. If the medical community was only concerned about making $$ they would validate that qauck BS.
Follow the $$$
that is a new age belief not a fact. the most prescribed drugs in the us are cheap, like metformin the wonder drug. if alternative therapies worked, big pharma would copy not discount them. havent you read gerald posners book?
Whoosh
It’s a shame so many doctors are STILL not willing to admit these jabs are garbage..
They weren't 🤓
School closure was one of the best parts of the lockdowns, because it helped a lot of parents see how useless the current education brainwashing system is and that homeschooling (or Sudbury self-directed education) is far superior.
for priviledged people
The level of insanity surrounding this pandemic is fascinating
maybe this level of nonsense always went on in health. it's just that before they didn't drag the rest of the world into the bunfight
Rather likely .. and it’s becoming more apparent so get ready for the next chapter
It's been very illuminating in regards to the effect of fear & propaganda on the West. Most parents I know vaxxed their kids with this rushed , experimental gene therapy! I never would have guessed it could get this bad. Never could have imagined the power of Mass Formation Psychosis. Truly awe inspiring yet also terrifying.
Yes, fascinating almost mesmerizing, I just would love to turn away and unsee every insanity performed, but that would be stupid.
@Joe T Well, I am one of those parents that did NOT vaccinate my children! And I'm not an antivaxxer. That being said after these covid vaccines I'm more hesitant giving any vaccine to them.
Yep rfk jr needs to be heard...all his talking points..all he wants is the discussion...he has his evidence and court cases going on..he knows his data..and as he says...prove him wrong and he will change hia view
I love the comments on the debate he did with Dershowitz a few years ago. RFK won hands down.
There's a reason why they refuse to engage the man.
What is the Covid-related mortality for non-elderly persons with no comorbidities?
Invite RFK and have a real conversation about all of this.
He's definitely someone that won't avoid you and will go out of his way to have the conversation with you instead of running away like pretty much everyone else on these contentious issues.
Go the extra mile, for the sake of integrity and the collective good.
We the people are tired of echo chambers.
🙏
Well said
You can see a similar situation with Dr Drew, except Dr Drew actually has smart people on his show and just disagrees with their information and opinions and still tells his patients to follow CDC protocols.
They'll just remove the video if it's anti covid.
Drew is a stooge, pigeon, and a peasant.
Agreed
Which RCTs were done on IVM and HCQ that weren't actually terrible studies (treatment was administered too late, didn't follow the protocols that appeared to work in the field, etc.)? Also, who wins/loses if these studies showed ineffectiveness or effectiveness?
Vanay’s response to that would be, “well then you fund the study and do it the way you think it should be done”, except of course no one with enough money to run a proper trial on it has any reason to do $o
You should dig deeper, much deeper when it comes to RCT’s. Did you know the data stays property of the company and almost always RCT’s are done on a “trust me bro” basis? I never knew that, so trials are run with a incomplete dataset because the company in question will not give acces to the core dataset only releases what they think will be good for the study…I never thought that was the case.
Definitely about who wins & loses. We HAD to use the industry's profitable vaccines & new drugs, rather than the existing cheap drugs. The losers were the millions who died needlessly & their families - & all of us who are stuck with this corrupt system!
Has Vinay ever addressed the HCQ dosages on the UK Recovery Trials? He sure does quote them and added them to his meta analysis.
So many people have just accepted these HCQ & Ivermectin studies on face value. Actually, some of them are so manipulated that any rank amateurs could see it - IF they'd only look!
Felt bad for people that couldnt go away from their house 5km radius. My partner went to the supermarket everyday. He couldn't stay home all day and night it drove him bonkers.
Review RFK JR - lastest book on Fartci. And circle back. Would love your take on him them.
Why not have an interview with him and get to know more about this topic further?
Having followed Cochrane meta studies for more than a decade, I’m convinced of the lack of efficacy (useful outcomes) for the influenza vaccines for example. I’ve often wondered why anyone with a love of gold standard RCTs could think these vaccines were efficacious.
Short version: for me, regulatory capture regarding vaccines has been in play for a long time.
Vinay, how were the trials on Ivermectin done? Was it given alone? At a low or advised dose? Or following the frontline doctors protocol? I ask this because I had a home health patient, 94 years old, triple bypass within the last year, with multiple myeloma, ( a poster child for a covid death waiting to happen), who contracted covid and refused to go to the hospital so his daughter got him the Frontline doctors protocol meds + Ivermectin and literally within three days he was on his feet and feeling better. Added bonus lab work drawn 10 days later showed his previously high cancer level lab values at near-normal. That was in November of 2021. His lab values are still low today. He just turned 96. I don't know what Ivermectin can do on its own but done within that protocol it was nothing short of a miracle. I saw it with my own two eyes
i am not arguing agaimst the use of iveecton or hcq.. in the bmgf spomsored study with hcq, doses for. exceeded safe levels
RFK jr should fact check Vinay Prasad
He should interview RFK JR.
@@Lo0320 Absolutely. I have a feeling Prasad will not do it, but I hope I'm wrong. He's great on a lot of things, but he misses the big picture of just how abhorrently unethical the entire covid vaccine campaign truly was. Pfizer eliminating their placebo control group... baseless and even fraudulent pressuring of the vaccine upon pregnant women... and the simple fact that these brand new technology vaccines were tested for mere months on a few thousand people and then pressured and bullied onto billions. The whole thing is jaw dropping and deserves far stronger condemnation than Prasad has offered.
Debate!
Precisely!
I un-subscribed when he didn't admit he made an error. I'm done. I rather listen to Dr. John Campbell, who admitted he was wrong and has been trying to correct that error by presenting the latest published studies...even when they go against the major media and government narrative.
I would love for you to watch some of his other interviews where he breaks down his position on vaccines and digs into all the reasons why he is skeptical of their safety. I would love for you to do an analysis of his position. He makes some very compelling arguments, but I'm not a scientist, so I would love to hear your take. I value your analysis because you seem very honest and genuine.
I am a career scientist, and Vinay sounds like a snake oil salesman too me. He tries to refute RFK Jrs scientifically documented points with unsubstantiated what-ifs. We who actually read scientific journals can easily see thru this video. After watching this video, and hearing people say they get blocked for questioning him, I believe this guy has zero credibility unless he brings RFK Jr on to have a back and forth live discussion.
@@rdbt292great comment 🔥
The main reason that pharma wants direct to consumer advertising is that it allows the pharma companies to control the news through the advertising money they give the media.
Your fact check didnt pass the fact check vinnie😂😂
Invite him to your podcast and have a one on one conversation. We’re all sick of this ‘fact checking’ approach
Well said!
Yes
Exactly. Cowardly to do this way
It's amazing to me how the comments are wiser than the podcast. Yes, look at RFK's complete positions, not just what he said on a particular podcast, and yes, invite him to debate you. Thanks! - Racheli.
I like how you sign your comments "Racheli". That's cute!
I'm finding that the comments are wiser on every video I look at about RFK Jr.
He never brought on Pierre Kory, Peter McCollugh, or Robert Malone. Why on earth would we expect him to bring on RFK Jr?
@@conchobar Yeah I guess you're right on that. tbh I'm not familiar with the channel, I got here researching the coverage of RFK. I subscribe to Kory, not sure I'm familiar with the other two but i'll look into them. Thanks.
Not really that surprising I think. This podcaster is a conceited twit with a superiority conokex
The steroid was a treatment they would receive when already hospitalized so it wasn't a threat to the vaccine program in the way that early treatments were. Successful early treatment would have kept people out of the hospital all together
With all their money and resources, where were the RCT definitive outcomes for treatments in 2020? Hydroxy trial at Oxford gave toxic dose to seriously ill in latter stage of C19. Hydroxy was to use v early in phase1. Doesn't matter if it's RCT if designed to fail. Better to go to a doctor who is prepared to treat based on some successes on the front line, than do nothing and wait till you turn blue. ... or worse, blow your lungs out in hospital bc they set a wrong protocol. Eg NY hospitals 2020.
My biggest problem with the response was the absolute silence from the medical community about metabolic health and doing things that will strengthen your bodies natural immune system. For example eat a clean whole food based diet, cut out sugar as much as possible, get outside and get some exercise and sunshine etc etc.
100% correct. These are the discussions that need to be had over and over instead of incessantly talking about drugs that do or do not work.
Not to mention vit. D supplements.
💯. The underlying truth is that vaccines are not necessary (in most cases). It’s the lack of understanding of our health care system of how viruses work, the subsequent inflammation that follows, and how to stop it that had the most negative impact on the outcome.
+Alan greg
I don't think anyone is lacking that information, and I do think the majority of doctors tell these things to their patients. However, if you want to know why we continue to prescribe medication, I'd suggest you watch an office visit between your average 300 lbs type 2 diabetic and his/her doctor. Most of these people aren't going to cure themselves with diet and exercise alone, an even the ones that would almost certainly still benefit from medications like metformin.
If you want to tell doctors that they're doing it all wrong, I'd suggest you get off your ass and go spend 12 years in college, medical school, and residency.
only if you totally ignore every single medical professional on earth. they universally say quit smoking, limit alcohol, moderate exercise 3-5x weekly and eat healthy. what rubbish!
So, the entire reason for the placebo to be nothing more than a sugar pill, or saline shot, is because saline & sugar are the least likely substances known cause long lasting, systemic effects that would otherwise cloud any results of the trial with confounding data.
Any double blind randomized controlled trial that isn't using an actual placebo in the placebo arm of the trial, isn't actually conducting a randomized controlled trial, because they're intentionally and knowingly introducing confounding factors into the trial in order to kneecap the placebo arm during the safety phase, thus reducing the clarity of any contraindicating safety signals, due to the statistical 'noise' presented by the very much, _not_ _inert_ 'fauxcebo', being _fraudulently_ used in place of an actual placebo.
This is why _none_ of your worthless RCTs should even be regarded as legitimate, much less as definitive.
Thank you for articulating this, I can’t believe he brushed that point off like that
It was embarrassing to watch a doctor just completely brush this off. I have a close friend who is a doctor and I have backed him into corners many times in regards to discussions about the safety and efficacy of vaccines. This being a main point in the research that's been conducted and is propped up as "truth."
The Berlin wall coming down vs widespread increase in vaccine uptake?? Vinay, you've got to be kidding!
I would enjoy to see you talk with either Bret Weinstein or Dr Pierre Kory. Some of the RCT studies that say Ivermectin doesn’t work are poorly done or possibly “gamed” not to show efficacy. I enjoy watching your videos.
"I'm the consistent party here." You actually said this. It's true, but wow. You're ability to use monday-morning quarterbacking to prove yourself correct about EVERYTHING blows my mind.
Actually, Prasad is *not* consistent because he still thinks the jury is out on lockdowns despite studies overwhelmingly stating they didn't slow coronavirus and caused great damage.
👍
I want all 64 childhood vax scheduled to be evaluated by naturopath s a group that has no money gain- this is why i will vote for RFK
The FDA must be EXECUTED for adding the Covid19 mRNA, US Military's BIOWEAPON to the infant immunization schedule.
Vivek ramaswamy looks good too (sorry for the spelling)
Unfortunately there is a movement in Naturopaths and Chiropractors promoting vaccines. I believe the pharma companies are starting to pour money into certain states where these 2 professions are looking to add prescriptive authority to their licenses. It will be a slog through state legislations and will take time...5-10 years depending on Red/Blue states. Check your state out and monitor for this type of activity. Its call about $$$$ not health.
Naturopaths are incredibly biased though, enormously so. Not even because of monetary gain, because it is the basis of their entire belief system
No one wants to debate Kennedy jr not now or ever and will run as fast as they can just watch
When I saw Vinay with Zdogg , I knew he was full of it. He sprinkles some good stuff in but he is definitely on the payroll
I think he’s just naive.
So he has a point about regulatory capture and why this may lead to corruption but lets trust them and their studies anyways?
Can someone explain how this reasoning works?
He wrote a book that included citations to support his claims about Covid. Why didn't you refer to those citations?
Cause his citations were trash if you actually look at them
@@joeboy1884There are hundreds and hundreds. They’re all bad?
I think you haven’t looked at it.
My thought exactly.
He has had no legal cases brought against him for his claims. No defamation or anything. The guy knows his stuff
@@rosezingleman5007 Plus, he's a successful attorney. He'd be an idiot to not have documentation. He'd be sued for libel.
Granted. I'm not planning on voting Dem just for RFK and this one issue. I don't think he's truly ready to believe that the party he grew up with is gone. If it was ever what he believed it was.
Everything Bobby said is correct. You need to do more research on some things you are still set on. I like the way you try to make his arguments stronger. You’ve come a long way since early covid and the jab launch.
Do u think he has now sold out to big farma
Vinay, I read your books and was curious on your opinion on the fact that most of the traditional vaccines came out in the era before EBM and therefore don't have RCT data supporting their safety or efficacy. Since you're a big proponent of RCTs and a big proponent of running RCTs on traditional medical practices that were grandfathered in before the era of EBM, shouldn't we do them on our traditional vaccines. I know of one 'R'CT done on the DPT vaccine in Guniea-Bissau, and it was negative. Despite the kids getting the DPT vaccine getting less of the diseases they were vaccinated for (good) they were more likely to die of other diseases.
the primary argument about HCQ/Ivermectin is not necessarily that those drugs were helpful, it's that they were HARMLESS to try and therefore should never have elicited the reaction from the powers that be that it did.
Um. RFKjr has receipts for all his claims. He welcomes anyone come prove him wrong. Try doing that to his face.
I think that is the point that needs to be pressed - RFK is not rigid or doctrinaire, and he is open to facts and can be reasoned with. Also - at least to me, these finer points about vaccines are not the big major points that i think we need in a president to set some things in this country right.
A sell out can’t do that
Prasad won't debate RFK in a livestream without edits or cuts because Prasad knows he'd get wasted in combat. Prasad needs a separate video so he can strawman RFK without being cross-checked on it.
@@TheReapersSon
I think his criticisms and agreements were pretty fair.
Instead of accusing him ... ala the strawman tactic you claim to dislike, why don't you be specific?
Lol, “I can beat you up” is a logical fallacy.
sure, I'll watch this video before it gets pulled. You are cracking me up, these days. You are like, "hey, I think the medical system might be a screwball, and I never thought it was this bad". Bud, it's worse.
Yup, way worse than most imagine.
Before it gets pulled? This will get promoted by the establishment... not pulled.
Dexamethazone (I'm a hospital worker) is a steroid in case anyone is not familiar. I did hear a Dr. who actually treats patients mention this helping. I definitely believe ya there. JFK Jr. is a former law professor. I have a lot of respect for him. He has a true grasp on human suffering. So rare these days. I listen to him a lot to learn what he is all about.
If your vaccines have an adjuvant which could even potentially affect the person (such as aluminium) then yes you must ALSO do a proper saline placebo. Otherwise you run the risk of missing something that that causes. Such as some sort of neurological deficit perhaps. 12:03 And RFK is NOT saying he’s against vaccines. He just wants proper safety testing.
Vinay, instead of fact checking RFK, Jr. why don't you offer him your services as an advisor?
Also, how does one go about finding the RCTs that demonstrate a reduction in all cause mortality for vaccines on the CDC's childhood schedule.
Oh, boy!
Bazinga
Those studies don't exist.
I’m curious how he decides on which studies to consider when doing meta analysis of hcq and ivm, I don’t hear him discount any of the specific studies that disagree with his opinions…which studies? You can’t just say” I did my own met study”
Cause china pays way bettet allegedly