New US anti-ship ballistic missile tailored against China
Vložit
- čas přidán 26. 06. 2024
- Play Conflict of Nations for FREE on PC, Android or iOS:
💥con.onelink.me/kZW6/BINKOV21
Receive an Amazing New Player Pack, only available for the next 30 days
This video covers the new PrSM increment 2 missile, what it’ll be like and when it will enter service. But more importantly, it talks about how it might be used and how it might tip the balance of power in an actual shooting war between the US and China.
00:00 Intro
02:03 - Meet the PrSM
04:23 - Anti-ship variant
06:06 - Warhead and speed
08:45 - Chinese defenses
12:12 - Taiwan scenario
13:40 - Numbers
Music by Matija Malatestinic www.malatestinic.com
If you want to watch our videos without ads, if you want quick replies to any questions you might have, if you want early access scripts and videos, monthly release schedules - become our Patron.
More here: / binkov
You can also browse for other Binkov merch, like T-Shirts, via the store at our website, binkov.com
Subscribe to Binkov's channel for more videos! / @binkov
Follow Binkov's news on Facebook! / binkovsbattlegrounds
Follow us on Twitter: / commissarbinkov
Play Conflict of Nations for FREE on PC, Android or iOS:
💥con.onelink.me/kZW6/BINKOV21
Receive an Amazing New Player Pack, only available for the next 30 days
Make malaysia vs philippine
Like Trojan Horses, Beware of China Fishing Ships! In 1949, within 30 days CCP PLA fishing ships completely annihilated 555,000 troops in their successful amphibious invasion of island of Hainan. They use wooden ships against battle tested troops in defensive positions with high end navy ships and tanks. Imagine what they will do against people with hunting rifles.
Why don't you make a useful video? E.g., how the US has successfully tested the world's first AIR launched truly hypersonic, i.e. fast and maneuverable, weapons. These can be launched from anywhere at anything. These are USEFUL weapons that would get actual USE, rather than be dust gathering nukes.
If Biden really wants to annoy the Chinese AND have a lot of FUN at the same time, the USA will sell these missiles to Taiwan...
2 options:
1. Xi Jinping says to himself, OK... THAT costs too much, it's not worth it, we'd rather not invade. We have enough problems at the moment.
2. Now especially... We don't let anyone dictate anything to us.
As with Putin, it's just getting bigger. A shitty thought - and really scary.
But a cool Video ... thank U. 🤗🤔 Have to think about it.
Do remember the US Army is also fond of its M270 Multiple Launch Rocket System, which has double the firing capacity of the same truck based HIMARS missles using the same palletised system. It also has the advantage of being fully tracked so it has no need for a basic road network to change locations, unlike HIMARS.
Also that in an attack on Taiwan, Taiwan would have something to say about the amphibious ships, either armored or the commercial crap you seemed to think would be very helpful to a Chinese invasion.
>M270
Out ranged and out gunned by PCL191
Lot's of bots that are offended by Himars. I think more and more countries that do not seek expeditionary capabilities do not need ships to much extent at all. What they need are delivery systems and intelligence in order to defeat enemy ships far out at sea. Ukraine has created a dilemma for Russia that there is no solution to, and thus done extremely well in the naval war. I think that the next generation of sea-drones will be even worse to the imperial russian fleet. I also hope Ukraine will get more himars-systems, and more capable missiles in greater numbers! As a Norwegian I really hope our government is taking a serious look at aquiring himars.
Lol we have these sea drones for quite some time although these were called torpedoes previously.
Have you seen NMESIS? It's similar to HIMARS but with an autonomous mobile launch system that carries NSM. If you're interested in USV, look up task force 59. Ocean aero Triton.
It's hilarious to see NATO discover Houthis level ASBM in 2024 and then proceed to congratulates themselves on their on genius.
Also ironic you brought up sea-drones, because China's latest sea-drones with AESA, interceptors and loitering munitions already kills the whole idea of island hopping HIMARs
@vlhc4642 the Ukraine War proves you wrong. The Russians have tried using interceptors and loitering munitions and it still took them almost two years to destroy their first HIMARS launcher.
@@bobbycarlin6136 I believe the concept you're struggling with is "object permanence". It took YOU the individual 2 years to discover the first video of HIMARs getting blown up, it does not mean HIMARs require your observation to be blown up.
The missile knows where it is because it knows where it isnt
That's deep bro
You can get farther with a kind word and a missile, than you can with just a kind word.
Yes, Mr. Godfather!. Lol
@@juniorleslie4804 I think it might've been Capone?
Finally we do not only have russian but also Chinese bots in the comments
@@user-jw8sp5qy2j you dont fool me bot
@@user-jw8sp5qy2j Begun, the Bot Wars have.
Can't wait for Iranian and North Korean bots to compete the pack.
what about amerimutt bots 😂
Tu invece che bot sei? Americano?
Russia "our S-400 can intercept hypersonic missiles and stealthy jets". Ukrainians "But not cheap long range drones or Storm Shadows, or much of anything". Israel "Same for Pantsir and S-300"
Except for the large numbers of Storm Shadows shot down even when fired by the volley. By the way F 35 is not stealthier than the Storm Shadows.
Stormshadows are actually getting downed by Pantsir and Tor system no need for s400
@@philognosis6409 An F-35 also doesn't have to get as close to it's target.
Maybe some more will be built faster if Taiwan or Ukraine is allowed to buy some.
To put the PrSM range into perspective for Americans: A himars in Los Angeles can comfortably hit two targets in Phoenix.
With Himars as a multi role missile launcher it is not possible to determine where the anti-ship missiles are stationed. There was a camouflage cover on the atacms rocket pod, you couldn't see whether a normal pod was loaded with 6 rockets like glmrs or an atacms missile. New weapons will have similar camouflage.
As they say
What is better than perfect is standardised.
Wonder if they could strap naval SM launchers to army trucks? Similar to naval guns in shore batteries, but mobile.
Taiwan and Japan will help fund it. Taiwan and Japan have the money. Assuming that the United States is assuming defense costs for Taiwan which is manufacturing all of our high tech semi conductors alone is unrealistic. You would think after the collapse of the Soviet Union because they couldn't keep up in the arms race that these countries would have been convinced that going against us never succeeded. Working with US beings wealth to the ones that wisely use it.
Japan has money? Maybe you could let the Japanese know 😂
warhead size is important but penetration in my opinion is more so. the ability for a missile to penetrate the hull of its target, before going off... is always a game changer.
HIMARS on Northernmost Philippine islands can launch PrSMs capable of targeting PLAN ships in the Taiwan Strait and facilities on China's coast.
You really need to cover US basing rights in the first island chain. The whole thing is dependent on forward deployment on foreign soil.
US basing rights before war is just Chinese basing rights during and after the war
@@vlhc4642china won't be taking those islands, they will lose their whole navy if they try
The islands belong to Japan and South Korea and Philippines and they asked us to be there
And you think the Flips have a problem with that considering the invasive chinese fishermen?
@SilenTHerO78614 It's Binkov's war gaming scenario, therefore responsibility to articulate key dependencies. He can hand wave it if he wishes to omit in favour of more time discussing weapon system, but it must be acknowledged.
Himars has proven value as an air force replacement when air dominance cannot be had.
Reference S-400: when are we going to stop accepting Russian claims about a weapon system’s capabilities as factual?
Excellent video. I really appreciate the time and energy spent on each one.
Great video, thanks so much.
Winnie the Pooh must have gotten big mad to set his minions off this much.
If Boeing is making it I wouldn't be worried 😂
They do it for free.
Prsm on the himars will be really hard to find, especially with how many good places to hide in the Philippines. The range will allow the to hit ship landing on the beach
not including the “dragon” anti ship missiles in pallets “fired” from military cargo planes…
loved ths vid. Good stuff.
Oh we have all seen how well s400 works... not great
Those launchers have better success at intercepting something than the missiles themselves if youknow what I mean :D
Shield and spear technologies never stop evolving.
Brilliant!!!!
😊Awesome thank you so very much for sharing 🙏
You forgot to take into account the anti ship missiles of the ROC land launched. Combined with Americans they would exhaust the defences of any Chinese ship.
The two Ukrainian missiles that sunk the 11,500 ton displacement guided missile cruiser Moskva had only 150kg/330lbs w#r heads.
In case of a ballistic missile quite a bit of additional kinetic energy will come on top, from the higher speed. I think the smaller w#r heads will do just fine.
That does seem a bit sketchy though, generally warheads that small shouldn't be able to sink a ship that size without a large number of hits. It's likely the Russians had very poor damage control procedures or the missiles triggered secondary detonations.
I don't know that's 40% bigger than the warhead on this missile.
Obviously the M270 also would be able to fire it, and 4 at a time.
Comrade, it was pleasurable to see you appear on camera in this week’s installment.
You don't have to sink a ship to make it inoperable. Targeting sensors, radars, radio antennas, satellite links etc. will make most combat ineffective and essentially leave it a sitting duck for more powerful but more easily defended weapons to completely destroy it if desired.
Cold War 2.0 will be more interesting than the 1.0 version
I believe PrSM should get an air-launched and especially USV-launched versions. Unmanned vessels proved to be extremely effective, and turning them into extremely stealthy missile platforms would make them even more dangerous.
They may be too big to put inside a F35. And also too big to put in the small USVs used by Ukraine. A bigger USV is possible but the cost of that USV from our defense contractors may be too expensive. The biggest problem of the US military is cost of its hardware and the time to develop and field the hardware.
@@mgronich948too big for an F-35, but normal for any 4 gen fighter. And I think bigger USV wouldn’t be much more expensive, especially if we can trade massive warhead for several missile tubes. And it would still be way cheaper than any manned vessel.
”Russian Arms Export Agency claims…” 😀 Sure they do!
Isn’t the Marines the ones ditching their tanks for the Nmesis anti ship mobile launcher so they can rapidly deploy them on islands near Taiwan.
Yes. USMC tanks are already gone. Actually, a few of their old M1A1s were the ones provided to Ukraine.
@@VisibilityFoggy I think they are keeping a small amount and gave the rest to the army.
Russia unlocked years of technical development for US military by backing out of treaty.
I wonder if a submarine-launched option has been explored? That could be a bit of a game-changer.
In it's day the Harpoon missile set the standard for anti-ship missiles.
Waiting to see a video of your take on the US ARRW Hypersonic Missile test that just happened.
What about LRHW and ARRW, they are also in service now and deployed on guam and in the future the philipines
Nah ...U$ won't actually use it .
Neither the Philippines or Japan .
U$ will launch it's cruise missiles from the sea and the air .
Arrw got cancelled long time ago and lrhw is yet still a dream and will be cancelled too cuz of dei and incompetence.
@@helloworld040 and yet both are in service and already being fielded in guam
Those should be shipped to Ukraine then for some live tests...
PRSM is already in service in 2024 defence budget number is around 220-240 but from 2025 they will start mass production.
Odd question: What about severing Iran from the internet?
That would cripple the country's economy and make the daily lives for its citizens hard. Would literally be forcing Iran's hand and driving the US and Iran closer to war. Not to point out doing that to another country does not look good Internationally And who's to say Iran wouldn't Do something of equal measure Back to America.
The US Marines have changed their strategy and gave a big chunk of their Abrams tanks to the Army and are replacing them with the Nmesis anti ship portable missile launcher and there tactic is to have them stationed on islands with 100 marines.
-there- their
@@benthere2667 thanks I had spell check change it on me.
@@benthere2667pedant
iran and the houthies are about to really find out what a B-52 bomber is capable of if they keep messing around
Cope
Iran has nuclear hypersonic missiles. Bring it on
@@bubuneowoo6161 no they don't because Israel is winning the war of stopping them from having nukes.
There was a variant of the ATACM that was to be fired from the Mk41 VLS as an ASW missile carrying a torpedo at longer range than ASROC
2:49 it's pointier! 😂
The Philippines now has Brahmos batteries with a range of 900 kms. Based in Ilocos, it will deny the PLAN South Sea Fleet access to the Luzon Strait. With US missiles on Okinawa, the eastern coast of Taiwan should be safe from any PLAN surface ship activity.
Let's just hope we can deter them.. Although I doubt that.. China always thought the time is on their side and there's no hurry in reclaiming Taiwan.. But that way of thinking was based on the presumed fact that the Chinese GDP will continuously grow at 7-9% and that the American downfall was imminent.. First the pundits said that China would become the largest economy by the year 2020, then it was 2025. Of course that's BS so now they say by 2030 China will definitely step over USA and become the top dog.. But then again, maybe not... Chinese economy is in serious problems. GDP growth rates are extremely low for China. So the Communist party realized that they have maybe a few years in which to try and invade Taiwan... That won't happen of course cause Japan, Philippines, Australia, India and S Korea are rearming massively too.. The missiles will unfortunately fly.. We will see another great war...
@@markbrisec3972 Or maybe China will just chicken out and we might not see that great war 😊
THANKS 🇺🇸
This prism missile is really pointy, admiral Aladeen would be proud
Super hitech pricy weapons vs shovels with old washing machine chips..
The AGM-158C LRASM stealth air launch anti-ship missile is also already in our arsenal.
Subsonic anti ship missile untested in combat wow
@@wmk4454 How many anti-ship missiles have been tried in combat? Perhaps the Exocet, in the Falkland's or the Silkworm, the Exocet was a killer, but the only sea targets a Silkworm, hit was a slow mover. Us anti-ships missiles have been tested ad-nauseum, and work even copies of Harpoon, like the Neptune have no problem sinking Russian ships. Sea skimming missiles with stealth are all subsonic, so, don't look down your nose at them.
@@AdamosDadthe US put all their money thinking that the enemy can't detect stealthy missile properly, even at close range. When I mean untested I'm talking about this idea. If the US finds out the enemy can properly track and destroy the LRASM from 30-40 km then the LRASM give pretty much 0 advantage over the harpoon other than range. Compare that to Russia and China that test and field many missile concepts (stealth, supersonic cruise, hypersonic cruise, ballistic missile)
@@wmk4454 I joined the Navy in 1968, even back then we were testing many different anti-ship, anti-submarine and anti-air weapon, the intensity of research, development has only intensified. We even did research and testing of energy weapons and counter ECM, back then. Anyone now claiming superiority in weapons is a child new to the game.
@@AdamosDadthen you have completely underestimated the kind of research and development done by other nations, particularly China. This kind of hubris is what will bring the west to its knees
Imagine if Ukraine had access to 500 km range ground-to-ground missiles. They could threaten ALL of the Black Sea.
They have those before the war.
Small comment about the ATACMS booster used on the X51. While it is true that the weight of the X51 is comparable to the weight of a ATACMS (early version), you can't really compare the speed this way.
The X51 was air launched. This provides the X51 with the speed of the carrier on one hand and reduces the "gravity-drag" the missile experiences while launching from the ground. For a missile with the T/W ratio of the X51, that's roughly equivalent to a 450 to 600 m/s increase in delta-V. Early ATACMS likely reached mach 3, with later versions (lighter warhead and improved guidance system) being closer to Mach 4. Which would also be consistant with the official figures for the Range.
You get this, China?
❤️🇺🇸🇹🇼❤️
🙂👍
The United States has a short to intermediate range ballistic missile coming out this year. We haven’t had anything like this since the Pershing missile because of treaty requirements but since Russia wanted out of the treaty that’s fine but that works both ways. I don’t think these missiles will have nuclear tips on them. They are also starting to equip the Tomahawk cruise missile with a 50 KT warhead. We used to have these but were dismantled because of treaty obligations. No more treaty. Russias decision. And the Tomahawks some of them
Have a maximum range of 1500 miles. Not kilometers miles.
Hopefully this can be integrated with the Mk41 VLS. Might even be able to get it dual-packed if the 1*ATACMS=2*PRISM per M270 or HIMARS equation holds.
Having a fast anti-ship weapon to fire back at the enemy will be a step in the right direction.
Peace.
I wonder how easy or hard it will be to upgrade increment 1 to increment 2. One thing that could affect how many missiles that enter service with the U.S. military are exports, as Australia has supposedly joined the Increment 2 program and should be receiving some. The British military has also expressed interest, so they might be a potential third operator
Marines already has the tomahawk land base missle
Different type of missile. That's a cruise missile.
I got to have this happen in this timeline!!! I need to see everyone on youtube called in for the draft! I got to see the look on your faces, ladies and gentleboys. It's time!
and that's where Lockheed....
The US Marines are adopting a similar strategy by ditching the M1 Abrams for the NMESIS anti ship launcher, the strategy is to station NMESIS with 100 marines on the islands surrounded Taiwan and in the pacific. They can also redeploy among the islands if needed.
Me Chinese me no dumb me spam comments like it's fun
So.... Anti ship ballistic missiles are useful now?
Only if they can be guided to a target. We don't know yet how well the prsm can stand up to electronic attack or kinetic air defenses. Its not like Chinese anti ship Ballistic missles which we know will become useless as soon as they lack the extremely vulnerable satalites required for guidance.
It's interesting to see how the Philippines involvement in this scenario for the launching point of HIMARS' PRISM and ATACMs. It didn't just cover parts of Taiwan but also those Chinese artificial islands in the South China Sea.
The Philippine Army is highly interested in HIMARS and Brahmos, while the Philippine Marine Corps is awaiting the deliver of their ordered Brahmos for their A2/AD strategy.
Russians put AA on some ships like the Pansir. Like to see a HYMARS on a destroyer.
So it's smaller than the ATAMS; then how does it compare to the ER GMLRS in terms of diameter?
Also, I'm a big believer in breaking the keel. Can you get info on the latest version(s) of the ASROC? I believe it's still deployed. Love that system!
At this point in history any potential invasion buildup will be seen months in advance. the question for China is would the juice be worth the squeeze. The US has an advantage of being an oil producing nation but I really hope this is just all posturing from both sides.
中国不是入侵而是统一隔着海岸的台湾而已，另外石油生产国是什么优势？没有中国，美国甚至无法收到来自墨西哥或者其他国家的工业品
虽然不了解你说的优势是什么，不过中国也是世界第五大石油生产国，并且中石化每年还向国外出口一亿吨原油，中国虽然是世界最大粮食进口国，但是中国是世界最大粮食生产国而且每年粮食产量还在增加，中国实际上也是世界第三大粮食出口国，所以你们认为的中国会缺乏矿产能源其实是多余的，因为战时中国不需要出口也就不需要太多石油，中国还在发展太阳能光伏新能源，现在中国越来越多的私家车公交车变成电动驾驶，中国其实还封存了很多油田作为战略储备，所以中国一定能够打一场持续几十年的战争，而美国需要考虑的是如果与中国发生战争，那么美国商场如何收到大量商品，那些商品可不会凭空出现
Posturing wouldn’t have gone as far.
China is also a major oil producer. So what advantage are you talking about?
Whoa lots of long replies when i havent even said anything that would remotely go in either direction.
We have heard rumors of a Chinese army but i have seen no such thing
A man in a uniform is not a soldier, it takes much more then some shorts and a button up
Is there any missile that relies only in kinetic impact or maybe with a very small explosive payload? I mean, if the speed it's enough then a big impact could be enough to apply big damage to a ship or building. With modern guidance methods you can only rely in the fuel and small explosives to bring big damage. If the explosive payload is small or none at all, the weight can be used for fuel and more sturdy shell to give more penetration.
Its not that easy to use any electronics if the missile is covered in a plasma cloud.
I don’t believe so, at least not for antiship missions. If your speed is too high, it may go right through the ship (depending on where you hit). You can see this in test footage of regular explosive missiles. Also, unless you hit some highly flammable area (say ammunition store), without a warhead it may not cause enough of an explosion to seriously damage the ship, let alone sink it; remember, fire drills are probably the most rehearsed exercise in a well-trained warship, at least in Western navies (they don’t let “cigarettes” cause loose fires thar “sink” ships like the Russians do, or said it did).
As far as I know only some anti-air missiles and tank rounds (sabot) rely on pure kinetic energy to take out their targets, but for different reasons. Air targets are fragile, and tanks have small internal spaces full of ammunition (a bouncing round inside the tank would likely kill the crew by itself without a big explosion).
Taiwan is producing 1000 missiles per year, more than US.
Deep blue navy with experience🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
US Army is going all in on the ship-sinking business.
And business will be good in the Western Pacific.
Makes sense. Most of our enemies need to sail here to get to us.
We, the descendants of the Companions, were born to fight
Wow lots of bots today
It's an election year 😅
Ikr. It’s weird.
China also have similar HIMARS systems with similar range of ballistic missiles with similar Surface to Surface mission profiles. Can HIMARS survive on such a small island?
And if US fire any missiles in this scenario it pretty much means 2 biggest nuclear states are fighting a hot war with quick escalations
The First Island Chain consists of over 10,000 islands. China's coast is literally surrounded. All of their warships are within range including their shipyards
@@IsraelMilitaryChannel首先，第一岛链美国大概只有200个军事基地，其次那些军事基地在战时更像是中国的俘虏😂
@@IsraelMilitaryChannel为什么过了怎么久你们依旧存在美国能够在任何领域战胜中国的幻想？没有发现中国与美国之前的对手完全不一样吗？😉
@@IsraelMilitaryChannel most are quite small and under constant surveillance by China as well as US. Discount their ability to counter at your own peril
@@IsraelMilitaryChannel如果你真的了解军事，那么应该明白美军实际上已经将大量军力部署在第二岛链而不是第一岛链，因为第一岛链基本已经放弃了，还有现在的中国常规力量覆盖第三岛链
It's not I did some decoding it's the old MARS missile with new electronics. The British are making it. Mostly for close range defence since they want to use migrant boats to ferry grahem and friends around scandanavia mostly through Poland. Russians already know all about it. But thanks for the update. Great job Brits. You have x amount of mars missiles with x and so and so capabilities.
wow
The US must begin testing the effectiveness of these missiles immediately by letting Ukraine try them out in real battle conditions vs the Russian fleet in the Black Sea.
Why would they give another nation the chance to learn about the capabilities of their system?
Why? Russia can't bring anything through the Bosporus straight anyway.
@@shaun469 What does that have to do with testing missiles against Russian ships that are currently on the Black Sea?
@@blazunlimited that its a stupid idea.
Wow wow wow the bots have descended 😮. Any way imagine playing against binkov in any game. He'd lose every battle and still crush you bexause logistics go brrrr
So missiles will fight missiles and the humans will be spared?
8:25 what was that?
Like nothing personal, but within 1st minute of the video "US army...from their HIMARS launchers". Himars launchers aren't theirs, they're USMCs'...
USMC rarely has any exclusive vehicles. Most are developed in the Army, and handed over to the USMC.
@@jackfletch2001 yet HIMARS is exactly such a vehicle. Army employs MLRS.
@@neniAAinen Nope. HIMARS was developed at the request of the US Army 9th Infantry Division. The Army operates both HIMARS and the M270 MLRS. Its initial contract was with the Army after the program was developed privately by Lockheed Martin to fill the requested need.
This will be a new Cuban missile crisis, with Philippines becoming the next Cuba.
In the mean time Iran and Venezuela thanks United States for lifting the range limits for export missiles.
Taiwan also got hundreds of AshM of its own.
If you want to sink a ship after a mission kill, you can use something cheap like Quicksink.
Yap, Quicksink is a mean little bugger, but unfortunately not the first strike weapon... But in the combination with NSM for example who knows? That being said I still can't accept the fact that the US Navy choose the Naval strike missile as it's primary ship born and launched anti ship missile. The range, speed and warhead are all abysmal.. Sure, it's a massive upgrade compared to the aging Harpoon, but getting invested heavily in the Mach 0,9 missile with the 260 pound warhead and the range of around 120 miles, while you already have the missiles like LRASM operational, is nonsensical.. I mean LRASM, although also a subsonic design, is order of magnitude more dangerous than the NSM.
LRASM sports a ground braking autonomous targeting system based on AI, a massive 1000 lb warhead and the range in excess of 250 miles... Oh yes, LRASM can also be fired from a Mark 41 VLS that is found on all US surface combatants. And knowing all that we went with the NSM.. Why??
I understand it's a smaller and lighter missile, so you can put a few of them on ships that don't have VLS tubes or are small, but for the Burkes and Ticos, there should have been only LRASM for now and the soon to be developed Anti surface Increment 2, which is thought will be a hypersonic missile..
Oh, I digress... Quicksink should go in tandem with NSM cause NSM won't be able to sink a corvette, let alone the Type 055 destroyer.
The US army is getting mobile launchers that can throw the Tomahawk. That should scare the hell out of any of our adversaries.
Not for China and Russia .
@@peekaboopeekaboo1165 Lol. Ok....
And if they use the new Maritime Strike Tomahawk and operate from the first island chain, then Chinese ships won't even be able to leave port.
@@jason1440
PRC has the technologies to neutralize it .
@@180life4
Nah... PRC has the technologies to neutralize the tomahawks .
If their ships are as tough as their skyscrappers and apartment buildings, just wait it out.
Chinesium dissolves in water.
Naval version of rapid dragon is needed.
Since Congress and Parliament seem utterly incapable of properly funding the USN and RN, both navies ought to each requisition at least a hundred merchant vessels (preferably smaller and faster) and oitfit them with HIMARS, Tomahawks, and LRASMs (or at least extra harpoon/exocet launchers), CWIS or RIMs, and artillery pieces with fire control.
The British Merchant fleet is huge (between UK/caymans/Bermuda and Bahams and Malta), and though the US doesnt have a vast merchant marine the Marianas and Marshalls have a sizable number of ships. Some sort of deal could be worked out.
A naval varient of rapid dragon would immediately cancel out China's quantitative edge, and would actually further enforce the qualitative edge of rhe USN (as well well as triple RN power projection, at least by freeing all front line ships from second line duties)
Big hit on China's Eastern side strategy.
The wumao out in force on this one 😂
Earning that 50¢
Global Militaries of ANY country are like rich kids at this point. Seeing the other kid have advanced and cool toys and they want one too.
"Hey! I (Military General) got a cool new missile!"
"I got one too. My one's better than yours"
"Well My Dad (Military Industial Complex of said country) got me an even better one. And no you can't have it!"
"My Dad can make me a better toy than your dad!"
That’s the way militaries have always worked. Congratulations on your observation, my 9 year old son made the same one
USA should make weapon that Tailor made vs PLA China military
To All-Pilipino ,dapat lagyan ng Missile defense sa VISAYAS.Nakita ko yang AREA walang Defense.Kaya lagyan talaga .Sa Panay Island at Mindoro 😊😊.Dapat ang HIMARS ,THAAD at ICBM ilagay dyan .Sa amin sa CEBU ,DAPAT AY ICBM NUCLEAR WARHEADS.PARA NAKAKATAKOT LAPITAN ANG CENTRAL PART NG BANSA.OK, APPROVED W/O THINKING 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔😅
It’s gonna cost us more than the ship cost the Chinese. And some Lockheed ceo is gonna Scrooge mcduck into a pool of our money
Uh, no. Missiles cost millions of dollars, ships cost hundreds of millions of dollars, even in china. Type 055 destroyers cost 800 million
Takes multiple years to produce one ship versus months for a missile
0:16 *rapidly
Didn't US just test ARRW from Guam. NMESIS armed with NSM would be deployed as well. Quicksink would definitely be used for west Philippine sea.
You mean the ARRW test where they "gained valuable data" and declined to comment on if it succeeded? lol
This will filter out the Chinese Bots
动态网自由门 天安門 天安门 法輪功 李洪志 六四天安門事件天安門大屠殺 反右派鬥爭 大躍進政策 人權 民運 自由 獨立 多黨制台灣 臺灣 中華民國 西藏 土伯特 唐古特 達賴喇嘛 法輪功 新疆維吾爾諾貝爾和平獎 劉暁民主 言論 思想 反共 反革命 抗議 運動 騷亂 暴亂 騷擾 擾亂 抗暴 平反 維權 示威游行 李洪志 法輪大法 大法弟子 強制斷種 強制堕胎 民族淨化 人體實驗 肅清 胡耀邦 趙紫陽 魏京生 王丹 還政於民 和平演變 激流中國 北京之春 大紀元時報 九評論共産黨 獨裁 專制 壓制 統一 監視 鎮壓 迫害 侵略 掠奪 破壞 拷問 屠殺 活摘器官 誘拐 買賣人口 遊進 走私 毒品 賣淫 春畫 賭博 六合彩 天安門 天安门 法輪功 李洪志劉曉波动态网自由门反送恢復香港 時五大訴求 民主平反集會權 警黑勾結 警方施暴 天安門大屠殺
Dynamic Network Free Gate Tiananmen Tiananmen Falun Gong Li Hongzhi Tiananmen Incident Tiananmen 1989 Massacre Anti-rightist struggle Great Leap Forward policy Human rights and democracy movement Freedom and independence Multi-party system Taiwan Taiwan Republic of China Tibet Tangut Dalai Lama Falun Gong Xinjiang Uyghurs Nobel Peace Prize Liu Xun Democratic speech, thought, anti-communist, counter-revolutionary protest movement, riots, riots, harassment, disruption, anti-violence, redress, rights protection, demonstrations, Li Hongzhi, Falun Dafa, Dafa disciples, forced insemination, forced abortion, ethnic cleansing, human experimentation, purge, Hu Yaobang, Zhao Ziyang, Wei Jingsheng, Wang Dan, returning power to the people, peaceful evolution, torrent of spring in Beijing, China, Epoch Times Times 9 commented on the Communist dictatorship, repression, unified surveillance, repression, persecution, invasion, plunder, destruction, torture, massacre, organ harvesting, abduction, trafficking, human trafficking, smuggling, drug prostitution, spring paintings, gambling, Mark Six Lottery, Tiananmen, 1989 Tiananmen, Falun Gong, Li Hongzhi, Liu Xiaobo, Dynamic Network, Freedom Gate, anti-extradition, restoration of Hong Kong's five major demands for democracy, vindication, assembly rights Police gangsters colluded with police to commit 1989 Tiananmen massacre
That's gonna clear a room.
@@Blightagaa🤣👉🤡
I'm in China, this doesn't work at all. Why do people keep on believing these stupid myths?
@@ImmortalKitsune Video-sharing sites including CZcams, Vimeo, Twitch, DailyMotion, and Periscope are all blocked in mainland China.
@@kellymoses8566 vpn exists 🤣