ChatGPT Copyright đ€ EXPLAINED
VloĆŸit
- Äas pĆidĂĄn 3. 02. 2023
- Have you ever wondered about Chat GPT content copyright? In other words, whether you own the copyright to your ChatGPT content? In this video, I discuss the Chat GPT copyright issues and help you learn the way ChatGPT copyright will work in the future.
To consult with me, schedule a time to meet here đ calendly.com/iancorzine/ian
To join my free WhatsApp community, called Metaverse Beginnings, click here đ nas.io/metaverse-beginnings - VÄda a technologie
For being a lawyer, you sure are giving bold legal advice based solely on your subjective opinion.
I mean thats like saying i created the statue of micha angelo despite asking the artist to create it
If you go to the art station and write a book on the entire history of the Ottoman Empire at the library and write a 5000 page book does that mean that the library owns copyright?
Chat GTPđ
As a copyright attorney, I completely agree with you.
I created prompt in google search and steel all the data because I created search
I'm going to run a test on ChatGPT and run some public domain stories in it and see how much it changes because that is still considered plagiarism if you copy it and just change the wording around.
I completely agree with you dear đŻ
if you were the one to create the prompt then what is the boundary/thing that's actually copyrighted? that would also mean an entire genre of music is copyrighted by the person who made it.
Wrong, what you are suggesting is a false equivalence.
@@biggersound if you noticed it was a question. I just asked, where is the boundary for a prompted idea belonging to a person?
I am a phd student in AI , I think itâs pretty obvious that any code/ writing / image written by any bot is a direct reproduction of what is in the training set (what these bots are trained on.) If you donât believe me , make up a word and see what image or prompt chatgpt will produce , it likely will be nonsense. So anything that has meaning has to be trained on something, and that something came from a human. HOWEVER, since itâs basically impossible even for researchers to determine which exact prompts / photos / data etc. was used to generate a writing or an image their really is no legal basis for any artists or writer to claim IP. Instead laws are going to have to be passed which make certain data ineligible for training under a certain license and if a company like OpenAI is found to have trained on that data they will be legally liable. In the meantime, if you are an artist you can also add noise to your images to make them impossible for training but still look the same ( Iâve seen lots of companies doing this.) If you are a writer find solutions that make it hard to web scrape your website (use more than just raw html. .. Iâm sure their are companies for this too. )
Very interesting... the truth is in the amount of work that is responsible for the result.. in this case the words + the software.. and also the images used to compose the results.. its a collaboration in which a negociation of property percentage must be negotiated.
Could be. ChatGPT terms and conditions actually give away all rights to the âprompterâ But the real question is whether they have the rights to give away in the first place???
They have only the rights to their part.. its like in a record production, the producer has different rights than the composer or the interpreter ( musician vocalist etc ).. but they can't give away the righs of the images the software used to compose the image if they didnt get them in the first place. Similar to producing a song for a client but using samples or parts of other records which could be copyrighted.
Yeah ⊠itâs just a matter of how an individual response was trained. Some have nothing to do with human words. Originated from other sources.
@@iancorzine i love your chanel / work by the way, thank you!
That's Great to hear! đ
Hi sir i need help please someone stole my video and repost and edited the audio of the original creator audio and made it to his video that he stole from me.
I knew there were others that agreed with me lol. I told IT to make it using words and prompts, and then others wanna tell me I'm stealing. It's ridiculous. It's unique, it's mine, and I can to use it for display and it would be funny if someone copied my one AI generated photo of a trillion (or more) non yet made others so that I can simply regenerate a similar copy if not just generate another entire image. I'll have fun with that.
Thanks.
Ok but if i hire a ghost writer and they sign the proper documents then i own what they wrote even if it was their idea. Which means sites like chat gpt need to give us something along those lines. It should be something like we need so many custom prompts and we meet the criteria for chatgpt to be our ghost writer, for a fee of course. But it would be worth it. I mean different sites give U.S. copyright as long as we have a subscription so why not. Anyone have anything to add?
Why would anyone want it? It's awful!
I can see both sides to this argument on one hand chatgpt did all the work while I just typed a sentence into it but at the same time chatgpt wouldn't have ever created that without my prompt
Regardless, doesn't it go against guidelines to produced AI generated material, i.e. copy to video, MidJourney, etc. I really want to know where this is headed.
What guidelines?
@@iancorzine CZcams Guidelines monetized channels can't use AI Generated content. Google knows if you use chatgpt, so if you make scripts, or art, couldn't you be subject to termination? I may be way off base.
ChatGPT đâ€lol
Again. Copyright must be abolished. Permanently.
Are you a crrative person? Do you earn a living from your creativity ?