The Real Reason Catholics Press the Canon Issue
Vložit
- čas přidán 13. 06. 2024
- Kerry Duke continues his discussion on the canon of the Scriptures and how Catholic's interpretations of the canon hold up to what the true canon of the Bible is. What is the reasoning behind the push for the issue of canon?
📚 KERRY DUKE PLAYLIST: • Kerry Duke
📲 DOWNLOAD OUR APP: Available on the App Store, Google Play, Amazon, Apple TV, & Roku!
gbntv.org/resources/app/?sapu...
🕸 VISIT US ON THE WEB: www.gbntv.org
📖 HAVE BIBLE QUESTIONS? Email us at: info@gbntv.org
#gbn #gospelbroadcastingnetwork #bible #understandingthebible #christianity #churchofchrist #jesus #understanding
Thank you Pope Kerry for clearing this up for us with your teaching authority.
Just finished watching this on GBN came to CZcams to leave a comment, I have contended with catholics on this very subject and have found them to be under strong delusion as Paul states in 2Thes chapter 2, thank you for your defense of the scriptures!
The reason all these books are not included is that either they have nothing in them that we don't already have in other scriptures, there is no evidence to show that they are inspired, they have things that are contradictory to other scriptures, they are incomplete, etc.
Dude has a dispute but doesn't know that the Apocrypha were books like the Gospel of Thomas which are a heretical set of books that goes agaisnt apostolic teaching. The Deutorocanonical books weren't considered explicitly inspired, but they were used by the early church and NEVER condemned in the same scope as true Apocryphal books because they weren't explicitly heretical.
CoC got most of their basic doctrines from Catholicism......a works Gospel, Baptism, Holy Spirit, etc.
Thank God for His servant shining truth light on the darkness of falsehood.
Thank you for sharing the results of your diligent study that we might be strenghthed and better able to battle the chaos and confusion that They try to teach God bless you brother Dukes
Thank you! This information was dense. I'm glad I can save this and come back to it as needed.
They compiled the new testament, the old was already established.
Great lesson
Where does Mr. Duke get his sources for his study?
The Deutrocanonical (apocrypha) were part of the LXX Septaugint, a Jewish scriptures used by the diaspora Jews(greek speaking jews)
Recognize false signs …
Ok just watching the first couple minutes of this there is so much wrong... like "Jesus never quoted the apocryphal books" - well, no, he didn't, but like five or six of the seven are quoted or referenced in the rest of the NT. And do you know what He did quote from? Enoch. And nobody considers that canon.
thenn who validate protestant canon?
Wouldn't a better question be - can we know the gospel? Kerry, what gospel does the CoC preach?
Hey buddy I've got 35 *different Christian "churches" within a 5 mile radius of my house. Why can't Christians agree on anything? Do you think that might be one reason churches are collapsing with attendance in a nose dive. Anyways... good luck.
Excellent and thorough teaching. I would argue that the RCC doesn't believe that the Bible is God's word. They can't believe it because it undermines the Pope, and he is their authority in religion. I have brought up many times if the position of Pope did exist (I believe that it didn't until centuries later), then why were the Apostles John or Paul not chosen as a replacement after Nero executed Peter in about 64 AD? Especially John, who lived a very long life after Peter’s death. Yet the RCC tells us that the popes after Peter were Linus, Anacletus, and Clement. What?! No Apostle John?
There is no single verse in the Bible that tells us how many and which books belong to Scripture. The so-called canon of Scripture or list of inspired books must be determined by authority outside Scripture. This should explain why Catholic, Eastern Orthodox and Protestants have different canon (OT).
This is laughable. No Catholic who has a base level knowledge of the canon would take this seriously.