PROOF That Adam Was a Literal Person
Vložit
- čas přidán 5. 05. 2020
- Simon Turpin interviews Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson on whether there was a first man Adam. If there was, what is the evidence?
Visit Answers.tv for all Answers in Genesis videos, live streaming, and much more-all in one place.
Please help us continue to share the gospel around the world: AnswersinGenesis.org/give
I would begin with Jesus speaking about the text of Genesis, “Have you not read that He who created them from the beginning made them male and female?" Mt 19:4.
A short while ago that was obvious. Now it's necessary to point that out.
@@quernalt and today's enlightened youth insists we've been wrong for thousands of years. God bless them all. They're gonna need it.
A big part of how I came to believe the hard things in the O. T. If Jesus said they are true, then they are true.
I would start with providing historical accuracy for the author of Genesis but in thousands of years that hasn't happened
@@imafeltersnatch7634
It was MOSES, stop asking the same question every video. This question was answered days ago.
There are movies like Thor, Avengers, Hulk and it would be so cool if those types of CGI was used to make a movie about the creation of earth and the universe and show Adam and Eve created. I would love to watch a show like that.
Planets form from accretion disks orbiting stars. This is well understood, and there are plenty of documentaries on the subject if you're interested.
...Join the Mormon Church...if you're worthy they will show you such a movie in their Temples...and you can watch it over and over again, on behalf of your long dead relatives...
@@travisbicklepopsicle Yes, we know how planets are created. Do you believe the laws that create planets just happened by chance and they stay the same by chance? Order is maintained in the universe by chance? We just got really lucky that it all came together just right so we could have life in this universe?
@@claudioricardez6614 great questions :-) great questions that have been asked by billions of people over the centuries. Billions of people pondering those and similar questions.
Nobody knows. That's why people are still asking those very same questions. I like to think there may be some sort of Creator, but I just don't know.
'Genesis apologetics' app has some amazing videos on the Genesis Flood
Proof. Knowledge doesn't evolve the knowledge has to be given by a knowledge giver, therefore DNA was given by God. The corruption came by sin, but Jesus paid the penalty it's not that hard it's just your pride gets in the way
What basis do you have for requiring knowledge to be given?
@@histreeonics7770 Probably a better word than given would be revealed.
When you were taught the many, many things you know they were revealed to you by a teacher, often human, but by God directly, or indirectly.
To learn something "your eyes" are opened up to it.
You mean it's "our" pride that gets in the way...😊
Appreciated the depth of this presentation
***it falls into a deep well***
@adelinomorte7421 Yeah, because Jeansen disnt get the education and do all the work to present this right? Why watch these videos if you've already made up your mind that no matter the evidence presented you just won't believe it! The Bible actually says that people will be like this, especially near and at the time of the second coming.
It's a young earth 🌎 praise God.
Life is young. The creation of this planet is not part of the six day Creation event. We don't know how old this planet is.
@@danielcristancho3738 It's true there is no mention of how God created earth, air and water, yet other parts of the Bible do claim this took place at the same time, so it's up to us if we believe those statements or whether to ignore them and consider the gap theory as more tenable.
@@alwilson3204 Al, I'm not saying the earth isn't young. It could be. I'm saying the Genesis account doesn't say so. It clearly tells us life is 6000 years old but not this planet. So to make the age of the earth a point of contention with Darwinians is a distraction.
@@danielcristancho3738 - If you think there is some indeterminant amount of time within the scope of Genesis 1.1 & 2 then, based on Scripture, nothing happened during that time. The Earth remained covered by water. There was no light, no sun or stars, no land, no life. The existence of some indeterminant amount of time within Genesis 1.1 - 2 becomes a moot point. It is irrelevant.
@@rubiks6 ''If you think there is some indeterminant amount of time within the scope of Genesis 1.1 & 2''
They're describing the same event, only chapter 2 gives more detail. No need to fantasize about indeterminant amounts of time.
Can't handle the format. I prefer lecture hall style format. I totally agree with what they are saying!! I just need to look through all the videos in "Answers in Genesis" to find the same information in the format that works for me.
Keep up the great work. I believe your ministry will touch the minds of intelligent people and turn them to the truth of God!
great job Dr., very consistent and understandable argument.
Consistent yet bollocks wouldn't you say. 🤔
@@SuperNictastic how is it bollocks?
@@DanielH92 To pretend that people lived for say 900 years to make things work is clearly bollocks. Absolutely no evidence for that at all anywhere. The story of Adam and others like the flood and that the earth is only 6000 years old is nonsense. I think I believe scientists and geologists who have proved stuff rather than brainwashed people who think a 2000 year old book from the middle east has all the answers to everything. The world could not be repopulated from 8 people who are very close family members. The same for animals. Those are absolute and undisputable facts
@@SuperNictastic i can't disprove any of the claims in the bible,i wasn't there, and neither were you. to me, you come across as very arrogant and easy to believe just about anything, i recommend you read the bible before criticizing it.
@@SuperNictastic I'm sorry if i offended you, that was not my purpose.
Thank you Dr Nathaniel Jeansen.
From the point I was given a grace to read the Bible and ask for its interpretation from Holy Spirit, my conclusion is that...'Every word and sentence in Bible is valid literally and metaphorically ' I have tried this with Genesis, Revelation, Psalms and also Gospel ..everytime it is valid both literally as well as metaphorically....
Nerin George ... You are incorrect ... the Olde Testament contains the 613 Laws and Commands called the "Constitution Written in Heaven". JeZEUS abolished all of them! The Lunar Sabbath is in the Olde Testament yet JeZEUS said pick your own Sabbath. The Olde Testament says not to swear falsely in God's Name (what is His Name?) while the JeZEUS testament says: "let your yay be yea and your neigh be neigh" thereby inferring we are all gods! Like, where in the Bible is "Easter"? It ain't there! When is the Scriptural New Year, January 1st on the pagan papal calendar? Quite frankly, you can't really appreciate the Bible unless and until you have been messed around with by man's laws (Romans/Cana'an 13).
So is Exodus 21:20 the word of god? Matthew 5:17-18: “I come not to change the law...not a jot or a tittle.” Deuteronomy 22:21 Hymen not breaking? Daniel 6:24 wives and children? and Deuteronomy 21:18-21 (stoning your errant child). Psalm 137:9 killing infants. Matthew 10:34 Do not suppose that I have come to bring
peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword.
@@harroldhenderson On its face, it appears Paul was God in the Flesh for only God can abolish what He creates. 2Colossians16 sees Paul seemingly abolishing the dietary laws and the 4th Commandment. The JeZEUS figure gave 3 commands:
1. Love the sodomites and pedophiles as your neighbor.
2. Do nothing you waking hours but think of JeZEUS.
3. Obey the laws of the hittites to the letter.
Looks to me JeZEUS and Paul were God in the flesh! The LORD is pope ... there are 2 LORDS; Ratzinger and Borgia ... of course the only way to salvation is through pope (unam sanctam 1302). The N/T is especially defective/words of man. Some of the Bible is the word of God but Josephus of Esau and Constantine of Cana'an invented the N/T for control. Your points are well taken Harold. Just adding my 2 cents worth.
@@harroldhenderson yes. 2nd Timothy 3:16
My dear, please don't be naive to the point of being deceived by wonderful words and wonderful stories. As of today you have great writers , writing wonderful stories, in the ancient times there were also brilliant minds.The stories in the Bible are a copy of even older stories written in even older books that are totally controlled by the Vatican, the Jewish Zionist Elite, and the Smithsonian Society which is controlled by the Jewish Zionist Elite .The stories in the Bible from the beginning in its Genesis, are a completely lie. It's written in ancient Hebrew, that (We the Gods 《the ones that come earth from sky =space 》we have created the man at our imagine and he is so intelligent and a creator such we are). All this is omitted, because the Elite wabt6to be in control of the humanity. Being ignorant, the humanity is better controlled to be enslaved. Wake up to the Reality.
Paul deals with the unfairness doctrine too.
Romans 8:20 - For the creature was made subject to vanity, not willingly, but by reason of him who hath subjected the same in hope,
It's not our fault that we inherited this condition and God knows that.
Romans 5:14 - Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come.
Being powerless to return to the Garden, Jesus gave us that leg-up, if we accept it on His conditions.
About 20 minutes into the video, those 2 charts reminded me of the Bible verses regarding the narrow gate vs the broad way. Amen?
Also around the 40 minute mark, when you realign the creation graphs longevity, I'm reminded of the verses urging us to seek Him early while He still may be found. Amen.
I read through the comments made and I can say there are a lot of people who didn't know what he was talking about and have allowed their own prejudice to form their opinion all you need to know is that the evolutionists are strangely silent on some of the Dada which he has explained is testable.
Eve ; Give life to,
The mother of all. (consumed grain)
Evil - Eve ill.
Adam ; The first man.
What Dada?
Your worldview will determine your conclusions. If you are an atheist, then your conclusions about the natural world will posit a materialistic conclusion. A theist may try to wedge evolution into the debate, but he has already surrendered to materialism.
@@chrisanderson5317
*As someone who's had the privilege of leading the human genome project, I've had the opportunity to study our own DNA instruction book at a level of detail that was never really possible before. It's also now been possible to compare our DNA with that of many other species. The evidence supporting the idea that all living things are descended from a common ancestor is truly overwhelming. I would not necessarily wish that to be so, as a Bible-believing Christian. But it is so. It does not serve faith well to try to deny that*
--Francis Collins, Christian creationist.
Leader of the Human Genome Project, one of humankind's greatest scientific achievements.
Biological evolution has nothing to do with opinions, worldviews, or atheism.
@@travisbicklepopsicle evolution cannot explain the origin of life, the Urey- Miller experiment notwithstanding. It is not possible for living systems to arise from a hypothetical "primordial ooze" by natural, i.e., random means. Evolution IS atheistic at its core. If you try to put a Diety in there some place, it is no longer evolution.
More than any physical evidence, God's Holy Spirit convincing a person is the most important convincing necessary for any person to believe what His word says is real physical truth.
It's actually the _only way_ someone can come to believe. "You must be born again."
49 in the Narrator states, (they are so engrained in their way of thought that it is futile it seems). It’s very simple as to why; if there is a God/Creator then they are severely diminished. That Pride Sin, you know?
Just solidarity
Who needs inherited sin? I have plenty of my own. Thank you Jesus!
Adam was a real man, but the apple wasn't mentioned once in the Bible.
It likely wasn’t an Apple. The Apple gets a bad rap. There was only one tree of knowing good and evil…and it’s fruit likely looked very different from any that exists on any tree today.
Cain didn't necessarily marry his sister. When you consider how long they lived back then, he could have married a niece or great niece. ..just sayin'
good point. the bible doesn't mention who his wife was. unless im missing it.
And you're 'just sayin' right!
Those, too, are possibilities.
Where did his nieces come from?
@@ryanp4600 Adam and eves children what’s your issue?
@@ryanp4600 His brother and sister could be married and make a niece.
You've got to remember that they didn't have the law yet, so incest wasn't a sin. Besides, you tell me how else they could have populated the Earth. Adam married his own rib.
Do you think the long life of humans, may have a similar effect on animals, ei. larger growth animals, such as dinasours? Don't some reptiles have the capability of growing throughout their lives.
Tht’s what I understand about reptiles. You make a reasonable point. I love studying about God’s amazing creation
Not just reptiles, also sharks.
Good questionn how about turtles
@@danaleanne38
Not long enough, they can live to 200 years or more in some cases. In Sydneys taronga zoo they had the turtle cpt cook harpooned for lunch but got away, it still had the barb in it's shell. I think it died about 20 years ago after more than 200 years with that piece of metal in it. Parrots can also live long lives also around 200 years so be careful getting one for a pet. 😂
@@technicianbis5250 there was a turtle I think it was in a bass pro display that was ex-rayed had metal in its shell turned out to be bullets that were only made for 2 years during the civil war
Serious question. I understand Cane would have had to marry his sister, and inbreeding would have been necessary before the flood. But after the flood, God prohibited marriage between siblings. Who did Shem, Ham, and Joseph's sons married? Also, Abraham married his sister, then thr tribes of Israel. When exactly did that prohibition go into effect?
Maybe the Tree of Life question will only be answered in Heaven. Love Jenny
So if we are able to use the religions' dogmatic scriptures to 'debunk' something; what is the difference between the bible and any other books/scriptures that says that their religion is the one true religion? There are religions that came before Christianity and Judaism, in which both told stories of floods, resurrections, etc.
Because the Bible is the only one to actually demonstrate its authority. Jesus proved it by raising from the dead.
Some say you cannot mix Gods History of what happened with science. True?
True, if you are a young Earth creationist and take the Book of Genesis literally.
Scientific fields such as genetics and anthropology demonstrate modern humans first arose in Africa around 200,000 years ago. The science of linguistics, archeology, etc., demonstrates human languages did not arise from the Tower of Babel myth, geology indicates there was no global flood.. how far do you want to go with this?
***it all depends what you think the "first man" was like, but surely we descend from another man and another woman, give them names , it can be Adam and Eve. The Genesis tells about it very poetically, but do not be very specific as today most of us like, it is OK, bit by bit we are finding it to satisfy our modern appetite for details.***
Will genetic decay continue to occur to the point that mankind will not produce any viable offspring?
As man travels the planet and there will be variation sources available. During the tribulation period...all bets are off.
Cain was worried about being killed, God placed a seal on him so that whoever won't kill him, implying there were other humans at the time he was exiled. I think mankind was created first with the command of just be fruitful and multiply per the NASB translation. Then Adam and Eve were created after, different and special with immortality and a direct connection to God til they sinned.
"The days of Adam after he fathered Seth were 800 years; and he had other sons and daughters."
- Genesis 5.4 (ESV)
How many "other sons and daughters" did Adam have in his 800 years? How many children did Adam's children have? How many people were on the Earth when Cain was exiled?
Of course, you cannot answer any of these questions. They are here for your consideration.
The Bible speaks plainly. You may twist it if you'd like but that is what you're doing - you're twisting it.
@@rubiks6 you make a fair point. The bible doesn't tell us how many sons or daughters at the time he was exiled. However, the bible doesn't speak plainly at all in many passages, the NASB translation which is the most literal translation says God created "mankind", indicating it could be 1 kind that is man or many. Am I twisting it, or are you assuming there were lots of sons and daughters at the time of exile without text to say so. Frankly, I don't know with certainty which is correct, but the text to me infers more people were on the planet.
@@justinb2374 -
24 And God said, “Let the earth bring forth living creatures according to their kinds-livestock and creeping things and beasts of the earth according to their kinds.” And it was so. 25 And God made the beasts of the earth according to their kinds and the livestock according to their kinds, and everything that creeps on the ground according to its kind. And God saw that it was good.
26 Then God said, “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.”
27 So God created man in his own image,
in the image of God he created him;
male and female he created them.
28 And God blessed them. And God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it, and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over every living thing that moves on the earth.”
29 And God said, “Behold, I have given you every plant yielding seed that is on the face of all the earth, and every tree with seed in its fruit. You shall have them for food.
30 And to every beast of the earth and to every bird of the heavens and to everything that creeps on the earth, everything that has the breath of life, I have given every green plant for food.” And it was so.
31 And God saw everything that he had made, and behold, it was very good. *_And there was evening and there was morning, the sixth day._*
- Genesis 1 (ESV) (Emphasis added.)
@@rubiks6 check out the NASB translation, the most literal translation from Hebrew to English. 26 Then God said, “[ai]Let Us make mankind in Our image, according to Our likeness; and [aj]let them rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over the livestock and over all the earth, and over every crawling thing that crawls on the earth.”
I saw your reply in my thread but am unable to open it to respond that being said I'd be interested in the proof your offering.
BTW "I think" is not evidence.
Well, what did you think?
What language did Adam and Eve speak?
Why do we have four blood types A, AB, B and O? I also wonder if Eve looked like Adam. One of the many questions I will ask up stairs.
Hi Eric,
Maybe you do have to wait so long :
Okay, putting all the theology aside, can you get four blood groups from two people? Yes, without mutation. This is simple high school biology of the Mendel equation.
Adam, let's say, was AO and Eve was BO and voila! their children could therefore be all four groups. It's not theology, it's science.
'One of the many questions I will ask upstairs'
Why? Is upstairs the only place where you have internet access?
Just watching this series. Do you think that once you are "upstairs," that knowing the answer to this question will be relevant?
Every word in the Bible is true. Otherwise all the Bible events aren't true even Jesus. So therefore the Bible is ABSOLUTELY TRUE. Love Jen
Yep I m in agreement, that all scripture has to be true , as Jesus verified in John 17:17 , and God finds it impossible to lie Titus 1:2.
Or not.
This is something that causes so much confusion amongst young Earth creationists and some other Christians as well.. they believe that if anything in the Bible is wrong, then the whole Bible is wrong. They then make the mistake of thinking the same way about science.., they think that if any aspect of a scientific theory, let's say evolutionary theory, is wrong, then that means the whole theory is wrong.
That's not how science works. Science is more about being wrong than it is about being right, and scientific theories are modified in light of new information. This goes for *all* scientific theories, not merely the ones that conflict with some people's personal beliefs.
This is how science works, and we wouldn't have science if it worked in any other way.
If truth is paramount, then we have to account for what the multiple sciences are showing us - independently. We know the age of the universe and of Earth based on not merely the paleontology, or excavation of old things, but also from chemistry and the way various elements interact with each other. That gives us the age of the planet very concretely, but the evidence does not stop there. On top of that we have astronomy, the science of light and Eisenstein's theory of relativity that describes not only the motion of the very large heavenly bodies and entire constellations, but also their distance and age. These are all independent scientific endeavors that have converged to show that universe is about 13.8 billion years old.
You're free to point out mistakes in every single of those scientific fields, or disregard all the evidence against young Earth, but only by abandoning the pursuit of truth. And Christianity is based on truth alone. Truth is one. Only the truth will set us free.
You will have to disregard the full extent of the corruption through the amount of politicization involved in funding of most sciences, or be willingly ignorant that this has taken place over time since Darwin was eggheaded enough to conceive that the contents of a cell were just a bit of protoplasm and not the complicated factories they actually are, especially when recently observing the RNA sequencing within DNA processes. If you don't study all the holes in evolutionary claims from geology to carbon 14 dating, to there existing no real proof of macro evolutionary theories, you can never perceive the totality of evidence of what you term paramount truth. Yes, the discoveries in creationism make it that simple to account for a functioning paradigm of the reality of a young earth as acceptable along with believing the Bible offers the proper guidance in life with what it does state concerning the subject.
I bought a new car. I cut a piece of metal from an inconspicuous place and sent it off to a lab to have it radiologically tested to see how old my new car is. Is there anything wrong with this? Have I made any faulty assumptions?
@@rubiks6 The only faulty assumption is that you need to test how old your car is. I imagine that testing that isn't cheap, but even more importantly - it isn't useful. You could use that money better, to buy your wife some flowers, or give it to a homeless person.
I'm not sure what were you trying to illustrate with your story.
@@PetarStamenkovic - _"I'm not sure what were you trying to illustrate with your story."_ That is clear.
The question I have for you is, are there faulty assumptions being made when researchers announce that they have determined that the age of the universe is 13.8 (or whatever) billion years old? Another question I have is, who is "We," the first word of your second sentence? Who is the "us" in your third sentence?
You and I have _exactly the same evidence._ Neither of us (that's you and me) is disregarding evidence or abandoning the pursuit of truth. You and I simply draw different conclusions from the same evidence. You and I simply have different interpretations of the same evidence. Are you implying you have a monopoly on truth and anyone who doesn't come to the same conclusions as you disregards evidence and is not pursuing truth? You're pretty sure of yourself, aren't you? You've walked on this Earth for just a few days and you don't even remember when or how you got here, yet you seem to think you understand all things. Wow. How can I compete with that?
When I walked onto the car dealer's lot, I did not come looking for iron and copper and aluminum ores, nor oil to be refined into plastics. I came looking for a car assembled, ready to drive and take me where I need to go and serve my purposes. When God created the Earth He created it in a state ready to serve His purposes, which is, for one thing, to serve as the stage upon which His grand narrative of human history would be enacted. Any years before God's creation of Man do not serve God's purposes. Five days passed from when God spoke the Earth into existence and when He created Man. God had a purpose for spending six days creating all things, Man being the last thing.
@@PetarStamenkovic - Thinking a little more about your last response ...
Perhaps a faulty assumption is that you need to test the Earth to see how old it is. You could simply choose to believe the testimony of the man who witnessed the Earth's creation. (That would be Jesus. He was there.)
Adam is a name for something, like Moses - which means New Territory
we ARE Adam, we would have done the exact same thing as him and Eve, we are exactly the same, we are not victims
Your name may be "Adam" but you are not the Adam God created on the sixth day. You are correct - we are not victims. We are fools just like our ancestor Adam.
@@rubiks6 yeah God was having an off day when he made man, what a terrible mistake by God. Oh wait, but God is perfect and doesn't make mistakes...
@@philiprose6226 - You are quite mistaken. God made no mistake when he made Man. You're just not looking at the big (eternal) picture. God did not make Man go wrong but he _allowed_ Man to go wrong in order to demonstrate the greatest redemption ever seen, all for God's own glory.
God Himself came to Earth and submitted to a naked death on a cross to redeem us and then He rose from the dead. Who'da thunk it?
God has written the greatest narrative ever told and you are seeing it played out. This narrative would put any human-written narrative to shame. It comes complete with villains and heroes. God Himself is the biggest hero and His most heroic act was performed when God takes on the form of a Man. Redemption is the greatest thing God ever does and it is Man He redeems.
Indeed, Man is truly a mess. Imagine how truly incredible the God is who can truly redeem _us._ Try to see the big picture.
@@rubiks6 so according to you he subjected us to shameful, sinful horrible lives in order to demonstrate how great he is? Narcissistic much
@@rubiks6 my advice to you, stop limiting yourself to the writing's of man, listen only to writtings of God, words not written in any book, but written on your heart
It is true that we all have our Garden of Eden experience(s). I know that I've gotten thrown out of the Garden a number of times throughout my life - situations / experiences that took away innocence. You can't put the toothpaste back into the tube or unbreak the egg.
Adam and Eve and the Garden of Eden is very near to all of us. Were there real people by those names who experienced what we read in the bible? Sure, why not? Everybody knows that such things happen. It's like the Apostle said, "The word is nigh thee."
On longevity of life time before the flood the entire planet was a hyperbaric chamber. After the flood there is no hyperbaric chamber anymore.
Seems interacting galaxies refutes the young earth view. We have hubble shots of many galaxies midway into gravitational collisions that appear to take millions of years , such as the mice galaxies or the tadpole galaxies which have trails of stars hundreds of thousands light years long ,therefore the universe is very old or was created to appear very old
Clocks do not tick at the same rate everywhere in the universe. Two events that started at the same time may not age at the same rate. (Remember the "twins paradox"?) God stretched out the universe on the fourth day of the creation week. That is recorded history. A galaxy far, far away could be created 6000 years ago, by Earth time, and could be 10 billion years old by its local clock. Alternatively, it could be as you said, "the universe ... was created to appear very old."
Now you have two explanations for old galaxies. It's not as if valid explanations don't exist. They do.
In the beginning God created the "heavens"...and the earth. It wasn't talking about his heaven because it already existed. I believe you're right Old Earth Creationism is the correct view. Scientist are tripped up in believing the bible because they've discovered 65-million-year-old dino bones and in genesis 1:24,25 animals were created 1st before "mankind". 6,000 years is the bible timeline after the fall. Not when the Earth was created.
Ah, Adam was created as an Adult. So was the Universe.
@@Landisil1 - Exactly. ("mature")
I don’t think the “Tree of Life “ was pointing to a forever “physical life “ more to it was the way to have a forever life with God …. And when Adam and Eve sinned human kind had to learn the hard way to learn this … that God has a forever home for us in being led by the Holy Spirit and later acceptance of Jesus …
And yet, Genesis clearly states 'lest they eat of the tree of life and live forever', certainly appears to encompass the physical existence of Adam and Eve, doesn't it? I don't follow how this could relate only to their spiritual perpetuity at all
So where's your proof
Why are you ignoring the biblcal fact that there was a water vapor canopy around the whole gobe that fell... this explains subtropical ice core evidence in arctic and antarctic regions with millions of fast frozen animals and foliage,,, the canopy caused a deep trnslucent refractive solar spreader that caused a glibally even climate
Why are you ignoring the scientific fact that this is nonsense?
1 Corinthians 15:45 And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; and the last Adam was made a quickening spirit.
15:47 The first man is of the earth, earthly: the second man is the Lord of heaven.
Jesus is the last Adam, you can't have a literal last Adam, without having a literal first Adam.
Revelation 22:13 I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last.
Genesis 2:7 And the lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
God gave Adam life through the breath of the life/Holy Spirit.
Matthew 1:18 Now the birth of Christ was on the wise: When as his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child of the Holy Ghost.
Luke 1:34 Then Mary said unto the angel, How shall this be, seeing I know not a man?
1:35 And the angel answered and said unto her, The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God.
Jesus was born of the Highest/The Holy Ghost/the Word.
John 1:14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
1John 5:7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.
whats more unfair is a God creating a universe that needs Jesus to come
Why is that unfair at all? He is God. Do you need to look up "God" in a dictionary?
@@rubiks6 Fair has nothing to do with someone having more power or not. I believe you might want to look up fair.
@@rubiks6 Also if God is real most most likely has no gender
@@NeverFlameNeverTilt - "Fair" is an illusory concept. It is impossible for God to be unfair since He creates the concept of "fair."
Yes are Earthly Father.
I find it sad that apparently intelligent people can believe that the six days of creation about 6,000 years ago, the story of Noah and the flood and indeed most of the Book of Genesis, is anything other than a myth... or is it a legend?
He sure did created in a test tube by the Annunaki
And just who created the Annunaki...that have been debunked.
40:00
I'm having a little trouble understanding why people think humans actually used to live to be multiple hundreds of years old. Anthropology, genetics, and other fields of science demonstrate that is not fact.
they believe that after the fall there was no genetic mutations or inherited things like cancers, heart disease, mental illness didn't exist. And that's why they lived so long. "genetic decay.".
Well you know how there were giant versions of animals in the past well we believe the earth had more oxygen back and made creatures live longer and some get bigger than there regular counterparts and the earth was one (Pangea) that would explain why in Noah’s day he would have lived longer and if you read the Bible you can see that Noah’s grandchildren life span are getting shorter to 500 to 300 to 150 to 130 to 100 after the flood cause the flood didn’t just wipe out the creatures that lived on land it also did something to the climate and caused an ice age. But I just wanted to answer what you just said. God bless you.
@@rodericgurrola1745 👌 ok
It was good until it was not. There was no man to till the soil. But he said this after he created man. But before he created Adam. Hows this, in your mind?
Plants were only around for three days before God created Adam.
My opinion on the age story is you are on earth until you have done your work God wante you too. Wether that age is 120 or 16 or 1 month. Love Jenny
Reading some of the comments here I never cease to wonder at the mentality of some of the human race. Delusions about religion, and there are many of them defy logic. In any event all of the different gods are impotent, cannot even protect the most vulnerable of us all, our children.
Every child that dies is raised from the dead. Every one. How are they not protected? Every child, when they are raised from the dead, is healed of every infirmity. Every child, every infirmity. How are the children not protected?
@@rubiks6 Sounds unbelievable. How do you know this. The church has got you in its grasp.
@@oldgolfer7435 - Is _that_ your argument, that it "sounds unbelievable"?
@@rubiks6 Itis unbelievable that so many people still believe the impossibility of a God. I aske34d how you can back up your claims.
@@oldgolfer7435 - _"Then I saw a great white throne and him who was seated on it. From his presence earth and sky fled away, and no place was found for them. And I saw the dead, great and small, standing before the throne, and books were opened. Then another book was opened, which is the book of life. And the dead were judged by what was written in the books, according to what they had done. And the sea gave up the dead who were in it, Death and Hades gave up the dead who were in them, and they were judged, each one of them, according to what they had done. Then Death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. This is the second death, the lake of fire. And if anyone's name was not found written in the book of life, he was thrown into the lake of fire."_
- Revelation 20.11 - 15 (ESV)
The above passage is one of many that indicate every person who ever lived or will live will be brought back to life and be brought before God. When you die, you will leave this Earth and be brought before God.
_"But he was pierced for our transgressions;_
_he was crushed for our iniquities;_
_upon him was the chastisement that brought us peace,_
_and with his wounds we are healed."_
- Isaiah 53.5 (ESV)
The last line, "with his wounds we are healed," indicates everyone - no exceptions.
Not only is God possible, God is obvious. You are designed with purpose.
Man it would be whole lot easier if the sheeple KNEW WHAT GOD WANTS YOU TO KNOW!!!!
he loves us, cares about us and salvation through Christ only. Thats what a good parent tries to do.
Jesus Christ ? Christ was Not his second name i.e. Mr Christ ?
It was a label of saviour !
Jesus the Christ !
Why does everybody skip right over eve’s sin and just blame Adam. I believe Adam sinned to save Eve. I think Adam knew exactly what he was doing, he knew if he didn’t eat the fruit to God would probably get rid of Eve. In a way if Adam didn’t sin we might not even exist today.
i don't understand why Eve and later Adam had sinned in the first place. What would they have gained? they were blessed with a magnificent life in a Paradise, with all the natural and supernatural gifts received from God. They had no reason to be disobedient. One thing that satan came up with, is that Eve would be like unto God, he made her believe that she would be divine.
There is plenty written on this but in short, Adam was passive and followed Eve into sin instead of intervening.
@@clarkfurlong5154 to my understanding Adam wasn’t with Eve at the tree. I thought she ate it then took some to Adam. I’m no Bible expert though so maybe that’s not it.
@@rayjaymoney1441 Your understanding is correct
This “one man” Paul refers to is Adam, as Romans 5:14 makes clear. Scripture presents that it was Adam, not Eve, who sinned against God and brought alienation from God and death to all mankind. Adam tried to blame Eve, indirectly (Genesis 3:12), but Adam is the one credited with sin’s entrance into the world.
There are several reasons why Adam is to blame for the fall of humanity. Adam was created first, and his wife was created to be a “suitable helper” (Genesis 2:18, BSB). God held Adam responsible for his family, as seen in the fact that God sought out Adam specifically (Genesis 3:9). Also, in His conversation with Adam and Eve, God questioned Adam first (Genesis 3:9-13), even though Eve sinned before Adam. Adam, as the leader of the family, was held responsible for what happened in his family.
Also, the original command to not eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil was given to Adam, before Eve was created (Genesis 2:17). Eve knew of the restriction (Genesis 3:2-3)-Adam had obviously informed her-but it was Adam who heard it straight from God’s mouth.
In 1 Timothy 2:14, Paul makes a subtle distinction between the sin of Adam from the sin of Eve: “Adam was not the one deceived; it was the woman who was deceived and became a sinner.” Eve fell into sin because of a deception; however, Adam was not deceived, which means he chose to sin. When Adam took the fruit from his wife, he knew full well what he was doing. He was not misinformed or misled; he simply decided to rebel against God’s command. He chose to listen to his wife instead of to God (Genesis 3:17).
The New Testament teaches that, as the first man, Adam represented all mankind. He was the head of the human race, and “everyone dies because we all belong to Adam” (1 Corinthians 15:22, NLT). The suffering and death that resulted from Adam’s sin emphasizes our need for a Savior-whom Scripture refers to as the “last Adam” (1 Corinthians 15:45). That title for Christ, and the multiple comparisons of Adam to Christ, would make no sense if original sin had come through Eve.
Although Eve was the first to sin, the solution to sin came through “her Seed” (Genesis 3:15, NKJV). The Seed, Jesus Christ, was born of a virgin named Mary (Matthew 1:18-25). He paid the price for sin and will redeem those who receive the salvation He offers (John 3:16). So, just as sin and death came through one man, Adam, it is also through one man, Jesus Christ, that grace and righteousness are given as free gifts to believing sinners. Through Adam we received a curse, but through Jesus we receive a blessing.
Faith is the ability to know something is true without any evidence. Realist's say show me the evidence, the proof of what you say.
Fides finds its roots in the word Veritas. Veritas means truth, as John Lennox would say. So faith comes from knowing.
@@dereklaing2929 Sorry but I believe my statement stands. Because you know something dose not mean its true. Your truth dose not always conform with the facts.
@@rickstandal626 you're right "my truth" doesn't conform with facts, but "the truth" does.
By your own admission you have no concept of truth and therefore your comment falls flat, both of them.
@@dereklaing2929 There is only one truth and it is supported with facts. What your doing is presenting a hypothesis You believe based on FAITH and your interpretation of the information you have at hand, and I have no problem with that, but don't try and sell it as TRUTH its not. Truth is an absolute no interpenetration required.
@@rickstandal626 no, I'm stating a FACT that is supported by truth. You are in denial of said truth. Jesus said I am the way the faith and the life? No, he is the truth, and it's from truth that faith comes.
You seem to hold to a charismatics interpretation of faith. I would know, my family is full of them. What's interesting though is you're trying to rag on me for "my interpretation" of faith, when you yourself are relying on "your interpretation" of faith.
Faith is not believing where there is no evidence, it is the evidence of things not seen.
The first creation of the anu…
This was hopefully made for the general audience and if so, please communicate to your guests the need to use plain language rather than showcase your intellectual wordsmithing. Jesus used common agrarian analogies or terms that were common and easily understood to those he spoke with love. I shared this with several (9) individuals including professional and non-professional and most did not understand the information and felt it "too wordy", "convoluted", and "not for me".
God bless
Aren't you trying to show off your intelligence by saying words like "agrarian" and "convoluted" ?
Maybe you and your friends (9) have AD/HD?
It sounded great for me 🤷🏼♂️
But Adam was not the first human according to the bible. Humans were created before Adam, as Genesis tells.
If Adam sin brought death and sin on all humans involuntarily, why didn't Jesus sacrifice and resurrection bring life and forgiveness to all humans involuntarily?
Good question. Shame there is no answer.
Fun fact Adam didn't have a belly button either
Amen and amen!
😂 I said before and I will say again, neither model can be proven or disproven, leaving individuals to choose whether or not to believe in Christ, that fact right there is your smoking gun, smart scientific people's, calculate how many different scientific arguments end in this result, then the statistical chance of that happening😊
A theory explains a process based on evidence at hand. Theories can be modified, updated, or rejected based on new evidence. Fossil & DNA evidence prove evolution to be a fact & the evolution theory explains how it works, which is random DNA mutations & natural selection.
Wish he would call him by his real name yahshua
His real name is Jesus in English. I dislike it when people who don't speak Hebrew as their mother tongue make a big deal of the pronunciation. In other languages, His name is pronounced differently also. In another language, your own name might be altered.
In Vietnamese, his name is "Chúa Giêsu." If we recognize him as the Son of God, as God, as King of all creation, as the one who gave his life as payment for our sins, as the one who rose from the dead, I think we're okay. Phonemes do not make Jesus who and what he is.
No disease in those days... people were not getting sick...we don't find the word sick in the Bible until the times of Joseph when he was in Egypt
Of course there were diseases and illnesses in those days. Because those people back then lacked the knowledge, they thought it was demonic possession and stuff like that, you know? Or a curse from God or something.
I think sickness came in when sin came.
Adam and Eve? It's all relative. Relatively speaking.
Maybe we are a living program made by God and all things will be reveal to us at the end. The kingdom of God is not a physical realm.
Rather than "program", I might say living "information".
@@kathleennorton2228 God Spirit is the ''living information'' in us. I use the word program because all is predestined before the beginning. Not post-destination but pré-destination.
@@michelhaineault6654 The LORD knows absolutely everything.
I believe that everything is predestined. I also believe that we freely choose Jesus. In His infinite mastery and knowledge both things are possible at the same time.
When I say freely, I don't mean it in the same way free willers do. None of us would choose God, left to our own devices. It is the work of God to bring us to the place and to give us the faith to be saved.
Why is one saved over another? It has to do with the love shown by saved ones, and their faithful prayers. Faith worketh by love. We have been ordained by God to be warriors, fighting for the souls of the lost. God honors our faith, prayers and works concerning the saving of souls. Too bad Christians don't understand the magnificent, vital roles we play in the salvation of others. If we truly did we would be praying on our knees with tears for the lost.
God is so comprehensive that He actually works on many, many levels at one time.
@@kathleennorton2228 This is the false gospel of men will and choice, of men saves through their own volition, also we are not post -destined but pre-destined to eternal life BEFORE THE BEGINNING . We play nothing in the salvation of the others we simply bring the gospel , only God can give life to is spiritual seed.1Cor.3:6 I planted the seed, Apollos watered it, but God has been making it grow. We have no power, all is from God.We are simply messengers.
@@michelhaineault6654 We are earthen vessels. The excellency of the power is always of God. Any and all good comes from Him, and not from we ourselves. He chooses, though, to work through us in many, many ways. He uses the foolishness of our preaching to save people.
Surely you pray for the lost, for their salvation? We definitely have a part to play, ordained by God, in the salvation of others. That part we play must always be us yielding to The Holy Spirit within us, as we become living epistles of God.
God is love. Faith worketh by love. Salvation is a work of God's love, wrought by Him through us, as we show forth His love to others, praying for them, loving them, and yes, definitely sharing The Gospel of Jesus Christ with them, without which they cannot become saved.
God does not want us to be just cold dispensers of The Gospel. He wants us to truly operate in His love, which is His Holy Spirit, and not we ourselves.
Doctrine isn't meant to make us into only dutiful, hard hearted dispensers of the message of salvation. Our hearts are to melt with love and compassion for the lost, as we seek to bring as many as possible to Christ. This is how God chooses it to be. This is how He works, through us. When we become harvesters, you can be sure that He has PREdestined a harvest.
2 Corinthians 4:7 KJV - But we have this treasure in earthen vessels, that the excellency of the power may be of God, and not of us.
Psalm 126:6 KJV - He that goeth forth and weepeth, bearing precious seed, shall doubtless come again with rejoicing, bringing his sheaves with him.
2 Corinthians 3:3 KJV - Forasmuch as ye are manifestly declared to be the epistle of Christ ministered by us, written not with ink, but with the Spirit of the living God; not in tables of stone, but in fleshy tables of the heart.
Romans 5:5 KJV - And hope maketh not ashamed; because the love of God is shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Ghost which is given unto us.
1 Corinthians 13:1 KJV - Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal.
Galatians 5:6 KJV - For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision; but faith which worketh by love.
2 Corinthians 3:6 KJV - Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life.
what proof......
There was more genetic diversity 6000 years ago than today ? ? ? I really don't think so.
Big whoop. Who cares what you think when you give no basis for your ideas?
@@rubiks6 Where have you been? There is plenty of evidence.
3:24 note: paul wrote "through one man sin ENTERED INTO THE WORLD..." not "through one man sin ENTERED INTO EVERY HUMAN BEING." this doctrine of human depravity is debunked by jesus when he said that heaven is made for children. if man was born with sin, then heaven cannot be for babies.
sin is compared to leaven-it will EVENTUALLY leaven the whole good lump of dough. that is what paul wrote: adam and eve allowed sin to enter into the world. as a baker introduce leaven into a good lump of bread.
god made man in his own image and likeness. because he is love, he chose to give man free will-the freedom to choose to love him or reject him. but being finite, not all wise, not all knowing, man is prone to make wrong choices, prone to being deceived. god knows this and already had a solution from the foundation of the world-jesus.
What about before Jesus? Why didnt god give the people he murdered in the flood the chance to be forgiven by Jesus? Have you ever thought about that?
Why do you all thing people lived over a hundred years and sometimes several hundred years. Thats nonsense and there is no evidence for that at all. Please don't bother replying if your answer is just "its in the bible"
YES, there was a first Man named Adam. In the pre-earth life, Adam was known by the name of Michael. Adam is a name-title that the first man on each of God's creations has. Want to know more???
mormon doctrine is led by their 'prophet' Joseph Smith who appeared on the scene almost 2000 years after Christ, and the warning Jesus gave of many false prophets coming.
"For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect." Matthew 24:24
We are told by Paul, that any man or angel(in your case, moroni) bringing any other gospel is accursed. Which is just what happened in the 1800's.
"But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed." Galatians 1:8
meaning the old and new testament, also paul's words, hold more weight than the book of mormon.
Here's a great biblical rebuttal to celestial, polygamous marriage.
"For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven."
God the father, being a spirit father of all of us people. Incorrect. He has begotten only one, and that is Jesus.
“No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.” John 1:18
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life."
Everything Smith and Young developed is extremely suspect. From Nephi to the other various books of 'prophets', to Golden Plates, Doctrines and Covenants, you name it. Many of these are contrary to the true Word of God, and are easily dismissed. Historically, archeologically, and most of all, biblically easily dismissed. God is not double minded having two different Holy Scripture that contradict one another. The book of mormon is not the word of God, as it attempts to be.
no ,mormonism has more holes than swiss cheese
Adam and eve's d.n.a would be "rh-negative!!!
NO......THE CREATION STORY IN THE BOOK OF GENISIS , IS A STORY TO DESCRIBE HOW WE ARE SO TROUBLED AND SINFUL.
GOD WAS NOT GIVING MOSES THE POINT TO POINT IN EVERY DETAIL RUNDOWN OF HIS CREATION......THIS IS CHILDISH .
Why is it childish to think God would simply tell the truth? Do you worship a god that does _not_ tell the truth?
Hilarious 😂
Black people in Africa were the original Jews. There is no Adam and eve, ever existed in real life. The people in Africa Ethiopia have been said that they have a seventy thousand years heritage history before the Pyramids were built close by the Nile River. The black people in Kemet were responsible for the pyramids. Freemason was born the because the black man was using stone to build the Pyramids. Black Kemetic people were known to exit 5000 years before the Adam and eve story was dreamed up. How could Adam and eve be the first people on earth, after about 70 thousands years black man roamed Ethiopia.
Off course Adam is real person. There has to be the first man on earth.
There were no 'first two humans'.
'The most robust statistical examination to date of our species' genetic links to "mitochondrial Eve" -- the maternal ancestor of all living humans -- confirms that she lived about 200,000 years ago. The study was based on a side-by-side comparison of 10 human genetic models that each aim to determine when Eve lived using a very different set of assumptions about the way humans migrated, expanded and spread across Earth'
--The research is available online in the journal Theoretical Population Biology
Genetics /anthropology, Etc, demonstrate modern humans first arose somewhere in Africa around 200,000 years ago. Of course, mitochondrial Eve does not mean the biblical Eve
@@travisbicklepopsicle so there a female but no male? What?
@@travisbicklepopsicle so prehistoric human existence is obliterated by their assumptions as well?
@@MergedElement
Because we can never pinpoint the exact moment when a species came to be, because it never did. It’s just like how you used to be a baby and now you’re older, but there was no single day when you went to bed young and woke up old… Evolution happens like a movie, with frames moving by both quickly and gradually, and we often can’t see the change while it’s occurring. Every time we find a fossil, it’s a snapshot back in time, often with thousands of frames missing in between, and we’re forced to reconstruct the whole film. Life is what happens in between the snapshots'
It's just the way biological evolution /population genetics works. We can't pinpoint a time when there was a first or first two members of any species. Remember, there were several species that arose first that then led to modern humans, homo sapiens I'm not a scientist, so I can't really explain this properly.
Sorry I lost the source for this; it was on a notepad document buried on my PC somewhere. There are plenty of other sources online, of course.
@@travisbicklepopsicle I see you believe in the theories of evolution which is base on faulty assumptions. I recommend you look up "Mathematical Challenges To Darwin’s Theory Of Evolution" at Hoover Institute. There an 1 long video where they break it down pretty well.
At some point God decides that he doesn't want to contend with man forever and he limits man's life to 120 years. I'm not sure of chapter and verse but it's in there
There are people who have lived beyond the age of 120 in modern times.
The oldest known age ever attained was by Jeanne Calment, a Frenchwoman who died in 1997 at the age of 122.
He attempted to cite a historical Adam so now he's going to have to provide historical accuracy for this Adam character.
And you still won't believe it anyway.
@@technicianbis5250 Probably because it hasn't been given. Why don't you do just that?
@@imafeltersnatch7634
Adam is real to me, he existed. He is just as real to me as evolution theory is real to you.
@@technicianbis5250 Adam is yet another fictional character of religious mythology. Who wrote about Adam in the Bible?
@@technicianbis5250 The Scientific Theory of Evolution is firmly rooted in the Scientific Method and 20 or so other fields of science.
Creation is based on stolen ancient mythology from earlier times and cultures and has ZERO supporting evidence. FACT
There is more in the Bible to support that Adam was the head of a tribe. Anything else is a stretch and a wish.
I remember back in the 1980's I read a scientific article claiming that all humans have a common mother. Why no common father? Isn't that rather gyno-centric?
At the time it was possible to trace maternal DNA, but not paternal. That changed with time.
After the full mapping of the human genome it revealed that all of humanity descends from a pair of common ancestors, who would have thought ????? It’s a shame we all cannot accept that and dispense with all of this racial & ethnic division and live the greatest commandment
I recall something about this as well. It seems to me it had to do with "Mitochondrial Eve". Everyone's mitochondria comes to him/her thru the mother's lineage.
@@timothythompson7388 common ancestors.. yes, except mitochondrial eve has nothing to do with Biblical Eve. Fields such as genetics and anthropology demonstrate that modern humans first arose in Africa around 200,000 years ago.
There were no 'first two humans'.
@@travisbicklepopsicle
Nope, Dr Nathaniel Jeanson (Answers in Genesis) has done extensive DNA analysis from the male side and correlates that with previous known migrations due to famines, wars, invasions, political & military conquest, et al throughout recorded history and the patterns line up exactly.
For example Mongol DNA showing up in Europe at the same timeframe that the Mongol invasion of Europe took place.
He has written the studies and books, even some evolutionary based scientist have done critical review of his work and fully admit they cannot refute it. His videos are on you tube. His work is continuing and there will be more discoveries as more is learned but so far it supports DNA from three lines (Shem, Ham, & Japheth) descended from Noah around 4K yrs ago.
He has the knowledge & education in the field and again nobody has been able to refute his work albeit some try to discredit it by using other data or studies and conveniently omitting the parts that support his work & nullify their positions. That’s all they have as their desperation to cling to Darwin grows more & more intense.
***off course Adam existed! I am the evidence. From my mother side I am descendent from the jews and according to the Hebrew bible (the old testament) Adam was the first "Hebrew Man" , but that bible is also, most of it, like the christian bible, and do not tell how, but the jews do not have any problem with it, like most christians.***
OK evelutionist it is your turn. Come on out from behind daddy Darwin and show us what you got to prove this man wrong. Dr. Nathaniel showed us real scientific evidence that we all came from one blood, one common human ancester just like the word of God said we did. Great presentation.
I think we are all too busy laughing.
Your cognitive dissonance is a bridge too far.
So Eve being a Clone of Adam yet a different gender is probably where you should start. Then we'll continue with inbreeding the 100 billion humans before us. Or you could just watch the movie Deliverance. Get back with me when you're ready for more homework
Yeah, umm..
Huh?
You can be born again from the original sin. You can have your mind renewed and your conscience cleared from the knowledge of Good and Evil...... If you want.
Cant prove the bible by using the bible .
Why not?
@rubiks6 because if you are trying to prove what something says is true you need out side proof.
@@NeverFlameNeverTilt - The universe is a closed system. Every proof ultimately is based on something inside the universe. Therefore nothing is proven based on something outside the universe. Using the Bible to prove the Bible is perfectly valid. Also, the Bible describes many things outside the Bible. We have merely to check and see if any of these things are true or false.
@@NeverFlameNeverTilt
Bollocks!
This isn't proof.
Who needs proof when you have faith!
Glory to God!
Darwin said that the cell was complex his theory held no water. Apparently he was smarter than all the evolutionists today on the planet. The cell is incredibly complex something he did not know in his day so we can actually pardon him
Source ?
@@fungames1594
I's be very surprised if you get an answer. Most commenters quote slogans, or headlines, they see somewhere and repost them without excercising their critical mind (if they indeed have one).
Not every person keeps a running list of sources.
@@sherrypie63
Who's asking for a list? I believe the request was for one. I doubt it will be coming.
@@sherrypie63 I know. I was just asking since I want to read it too.
oops. bye
The fallen-ness of "A Dam" is the experiential realm of all of us who agree with our Great Grandfather by doing as he did in that we choose the experiential realm of sin.
All story about Adam and Eve are simple a metaphor and alegory of something that really happened many thousands of even a few million years ago. So, stop keep singing the same wrong song.
You don't know this to be true. Your opinion is only one among various other opinions.
Why do people like you watch such in depth videos? Jesus is the Messiah, he claimed to believe in the flood of Noah and referred to Adam and Eve in the beginning, not an allegory or a metaphor at all, so there had to be an original sin that Christ died for us and rose from the dead, AND the explanations given of creation are not a fallacy, but apparently, you are. Now, go learn some grammar.
Says you.
@@johnc.8298 opinions? How about some facts? Genetics, anthropology, and other related fields of science demonstrate modern humans first arose in Africa around 200,000 years ago. There really were no 'first two humans'.
It’s entirely fair for Jesus to willingly decide to bear our sins. The idea of inheriting sins is different but more importantly that isn’t taught in the Bible. It actually doesn’t even make logical sense when we define sin properly. It isn’t something that can be inherited, even hypothetically
The Bible is clear, though that the world we inherit is cursed from the sin of Adam, and all will sin. If you’re talking about individual accountability for sins, yes I agree. But inherited sin is more accurate if we say inherited fallen world where we will all sin and are inhabitants of a fallen world.
@@benjaminstephenson3125 fallen world is true as man has polluted it. But not all people sin.
Proof is those tribes who make 1st contact with people from our society, these tribes have zero disease,don't murder,rape,etc.., and are completely naked since their tribe has yet to sin to feel ashamed. ALSO Enoch did not sin in the bible as he walked with god and was taken up directly to god instead of dying.
It's not the baby that sins...it's the society men have gave them to grow up & learn in.
We didn't inherit Adam's sin, we inherited his fallen nature. Therefore even our good works are as filthy rags.
@@danielcristancho3738 like I said. Enoch was not a filthy rag.
Therefore sin is a action, not inherited.
Now can humans act like the humans they grow up around? Yes. But if said human deny all the wicked in their culture...they can become enlightened & asend straight to heaven.
@@fungames1594 We are not interested in unproven mythology !
You never proved your god is REAL, much less made anything.
How was Adam created? How are WE created? There is no difference.
I have an idea that the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil was probably a mind altering substance that gave them full awareness of fleshly pleasures and comfort, making them always want to pursue pleasure, and the fruit compromised their perfect DNA, causing the beginning of the chain of mutations. The fruit of the tree of life might have protected DNA from deterioration, while also aiding in oxygen uptake and transport to tissues, including the brain. That's what I've been thinking about lately.
Jesus didn't die! To die means to not come back to life ffs. It's not a sacrifice if you know you're getting the keys to the kingdom afterward.
Evolution process is extremely slow. It's the sum of tiny DNA changes over 100s of thousands of generations. Asking the question "Who was the first human in the evolutionary process?" has no answer, just like the questions "How old were you when you were growing up?", or "Who was the first person to fully speak French?", have no answers.
Christians have no right to complain about apologetic theists insisting on not taking the bible literally. When Christians themselves, must by definition reinterpret the Jewish bible not literally, and often totally contrary to the obvious meaning of the text, in order to fit *their* Christian Bible to be compatible with it.
maybe you should give some examples.
@@ToxicallyMasculinelol how about the main Tennant of Christianity that says jesus is God, when the Jewish bible clearly says that God is one and an only one, and that he isn't a man?
And how about the claim that jesus is the messiah, when he clearly died before having fulfiled *any* of what the prophets promised the messiah will accomplish in his lifetime? In fact it just got worse shortly after his death, and to this day up to the time of writing, we still haven't been redeemed. And now we're all suffering under the dictatorship of the new world order, and who knows how much worse it will get soon, god forbid?...
And how about the Christian claim that the torah is obsolete and its laws annulled, and don't have to be kept anymore? When the torah makes it absolutely clear in many places that the laws are eternal, as long as the world lasts?
There is no *_Jewish bible_* There is the Talmud
@@joelockhart6986 the Talmud explains the jewish Bible. The Jewish bible is the entire Bible, minus the nonsense stuff Christians added to it in their religion. How couldn't you understand this yourself?
@@dumbledor22 *_the Talmud explains the jewish Bible_* Where? Chapter and verse please.
*_The Jewish bible is the entire Bible, minus the nonsense stuff Christians added to it in their religion_*
Interesting. I never heard that line of rubbish before. Normally I get the *_first 5 books are the Jewish books_* Or I'll get the *_Old Testament is Jewish and the New Testament is Christian_* Again not true.
If the whole Bible is Jewish why were the so-called Jews not mentioned until book 12 in the Old Testament?
If the whole Bible is Jewish why were the so-called Jews only from one tribe and not all of them?
The Jews are not Hebrews according to a Rabbi who said *_Hebrew is not a Jewish term_*
Israel, is a people not a litter box in the mid-east.
Please explain.
DNA proves this entire 90 minutes of wishful thinking incorrect.
Adam and eve are real
@@danskii979 Hell Yeah. They sell some of that sexy stuff
How so?
@@joel5644 Well products are made and sent to the distribution centers after that they offer you those products online and deliver them in discreet packaging
Did you not watch the video? The whole video is about DNA and population genetics. What, specifically, proves the "entire" video incorrect? What, specifically, is proven incorrect? The video claims all sorts of things about genetics that are not controversial, so surely you don't think the _entire_ video is incorrect.
Adam was not the 'first' person on earth. He was the 'first' man talked about in the Bible.
This isn’t true because Adam was the first man created by God. Before him humans were not created.
@@richardkyle8134 That is what Christianity says but that's not what the Bible says. Adam, was created in Genesis 2.
@@joelockhart6986 then Jesus must have been wrong to? He even quoted from Genesis 2? Along with many other implications in the Bible that support Adam as the first man
@@dalestovall9751 Do any of you have evidence that Adam existed at all?
@@rickstandal626 the Bible!!! That’s all we need!!!
Where is the evidence that he did not exist?
THE "adam" & THE "Eve" .....Read Zecharia Sitchen the !2th Planet and you WILL be enlightened! Right now, you are DOWN A RABBIT HOLE!!!
Biblical evidence? That's an oxymoron
There is no sin