Interesting how Disney's Alice character is so similar in attitude to the 33 version. Also what stands out is how iconic the Disney music is compared to the earlier one. So many great little themes.
It is like Disney made it on purpose, the cartoon version of the live action film. Now they are doing the live actions of the cartoons. But this adaption is better and more faithful to the “original” than the modern ones 😂
I've seen all of them. 1931, 1953, 1988, 2009, 2010, and all the newer ones after that with Johnny Depp as Mad Hatter. They're all pretty cool in their own way
Don’t forget the 1999 version! I feel visually it’s more faithful to the novels and includes more characters from Through the Looking Glass. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice_in_Wonderland_(1999_film)
Fun Fact: One actor who made it into both of these versions was Sterling Holloway, who played the Chesire cat in '51 and the Frog footman in '33 even though that isn't in this video.
Both versions are good imo and I loved how the live action versions from 1933 and 1915 had costumes that look very similar to the ones in the original novel. My personal favorite is the 1955 and 2010 remakes.
It's a visual shorthand for Alice's inner thoughts in the book: It was all very well to say “Drink Me,” but the wise little Alice was not going to do that in a hurry. “No, I ’ll look first,” she said, “and see whether it’s marked ‘poison’ or not.” For she had read several nice little stories about children who had got burnt, and eaten up by wild beasts, and other unpleasant things, all because they would not remember the simple rules their friends had taught them, such as, that a red-hot poker will burn you if you hold it too long; and that if you cut your finger very deeply with a knife, it usually bleeds; and she had never forgotten that, if you drink much from a bottle marked “poison,” it is almost certain to disagree with you sooner or later.
The 1933 version is- nightmare fuel. Still amazing though. The combination of animation and real life is ok but- man those special affects seemed like something that wouldn’t have been available until the 40s. Ok but the caterpillar saying "WHO ARE YOU-" in the 33 version genuinely terrified me.
In many parts I prefer the 1933 version, such as the "Drink me, not poison" part. Hahaha. I've always wondered how Alicia could be trusted to drink that without knowing if it was poisonous or something, now it makes more sense.
In the book, she thinks to look for a label marked "poison," because if one drinks from a bottle marked "poison," it's bound to disagree with one sooner or later. In Disney's version, she actually says this out loud.
Demasiadas secuencias fílmicas idénticas a la versión de 1933 en la película de 1951, debió haber puesto en los créditos el nombre de Norman McCleod porque no es una adaptación del libro de Lewis Carrol lo que hizo Disney, sino una versión animada de la película de 1933.
My jaw genuinely dropped in horror at the sight of tweedle dee and tweedle dum. Idc if this was 90, 100, or 1000 years ago, who would approve of this ghastly rendition? Who I ask?
Interesting how.much structure Disney lifted from the 33 version. Dee and Dum were never in the original Wonderland book, but were in Through The Looking Glass.
when Disney was doing the movie, he told his people to use through the looking glass as well though they only ended up using Dee and Dum and Walrus and The Carpenter.
During the making of Alice in wonderland (1933). Producer 1: Hey, the director we hired just quit some weeks ago and we can not find any replacement. Producer 2: Don't worry, I know someone who can help us, he is known in the industry as H.P. Lovecraft. Thus, Alice in Wonderland (1933) was born 😂😂😂
Tops is the book of course. Then the Disney cartoon Then the 1985 and 1998 miniseries versions. "Drink Me Not Poison". That's exactly what a poisoner WOULD write on a bottle! The animated movie and the 1985 versions are the only ones that get it right. The Queen of Hearts IS NOT The Red Queen. They are two separate characters.
51 is better in my opinion. The first one I actually saw was the Hello Kitty one, in 1993, but I watched it when I was like 5 - 7, then I saw the 1951, out I was on CZcams, and the first scene I saw was the doorknobs scene and the scene where Alice flooded the room with her tears.
@@el_mismisimo_sr.x he was talking about Lewis Carroll author of Alice’s Adventures Under Ground manuscript and the Alice books 📚 Alice’s adventures in Wonderland and through the looking glass and what Alice found there and the nursery Alice a shortened version of Alice’s adventures in wonderland with things explained by the author ✍️
I’ve seen some Alice in Wonderland Versions ,1903,1910,1933,1951,2010 1951 is actually really beautiful 1933 is a nightmare but I still love it 1903 is only 10 minutes long so I can’t rank it (😅) 2010 is different but I love it as much as 1951
The old live action Alice in wonderland was released in 1933, Walt Disney Alice in wonderland was released in 1951,Alice Through a looking glass was released in 1998,the game called American McGee's Alice was released in 2000 and new live action of Alice in wonderland was released in 2010,Alice madness returns was released in 2011 and the last one Alice Through the looking glass THE NEW ONE was released in 2016.
Omg didn’t know Alice had more adaptations I thought only Pinocchio did WHAT XD Probably because I’m a Pinocchio fan due to my pfp but still XD I love Alice In Wonderland so much and never knew this help.. XD
It's cool to see this. I have seen them before, but I actually grew up with the 1985 version. The actress who plays Alice and I are 2 days apart in real life! I remember my teacher made a little quiz for us after the 2 day TV movie aired, and then we read Alice in Wonderland in the classroom! Those were fun times! You know, I wonder if teachers today do projects like that-it makes learning fun! In fact, my high school history teacher was just as creative. In 1989, we did a report on social studies using Billy Joel's "We Didn't Start the Fire" as a reference. I probably wouldn't have retained the info half as well if it didn't become a fun project to learn with a catchy new tune and relating it to our studies
I haven't read all 422 comments, but must comment that both versions owe a lot to Sir John Tenniel's original illustrations. New illustrations are out there, but a lot of us grew up with Tenniel. He also penned cartoons for the magazine Punch.
I remember this movie and it's on Disney plus but it's my first favorite Disney movie along with Mary Poppins. I read this book and it's also a live action movie on Disney plus.
10:45 The End A Paramount Picture A Universal Release A Walt Disney Production Made in Hollywood, U.S.A. Distributed by Universal Pictures and Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures.
The Disney version is good, but being more family friendly it is no where near as striking and surreal as the 1933 version, i've always prefered the original. Folk tales are meant to be dark
1933 is different than the 1951 film, it’s because the drink in the 1933 makes her grow while the 1951 makes her small, and the cookies in the 1933 makes her small while the 1951 makes her grow
I noticed that as well. In every adaptation I’ve seen, and I’ve seen a lot adaptations, the Drink would shrink Alice while the Food would make her grow (Except for the Rabbit’s carrots in the Disney version which shrunk her for some reason)
My favourite was the musical version with Fiona Fullerton as Alice, Michael Crawford as the White Rabbit, and a cast of many more distinguished British celebrities
I will concede that Disney's version had the more memorable musical score and some dashes of visual brilliance, but overall, the 1933 version is my favorite. As a sidebar, I haven't seen anyone mention the brilliant, but sadly neglected, 1972 version with Fiona Fullerton as Alice.
Alice did not have to listen to her history lesson at all. Her sister made a mistake by teaching her a history lesson during summer vacation. Alice had a very good and sweet time bonding with Dinah and sleeping with her together while she was dreaming about Wonderland.
Uts sad to think that the Disney one was considered a failure. When the art work is so beautiful. The 1933 looks beautiful too, a masterpiece in his time. And we can see how heavily influenced the Disney one.
For 1933? That's some impressive sets and designs... Well... Okay Metropolis was here 10 years before...But still. Not bad. Of course... How can you copete with 2D animation at it's best?
i didn't know there was a movie that disney's alice in wonderland was inspirade/based on... I thought they made everything based directly from the book, i'm actually kinda surprised... Btw, movies from this age didn't use CGI much, so most of the characters just look like something straight from my nightmares edit: i just find out there's another one from 1903. LIKE... THAT'S EVEN MORE TERIYFYING, search that up, the images are just creepy
As they didn't have "computers" at all, they couldn't have CGI, now could they? They would sometimes use a black screen the way we use a green screen today to superimpose the character over some other background. But for the most part, it was "practical" effects or nothing at all.
The 1933 one is so admirable in the insane cramming of both books. It covers virtually every character that ever appears in both stories in under 80 minutes. And I think it captures the oddness very very well. Unfortunately Charlotte Henry is very miscast. Alice should always be british.
![[4k, 50fps, colorized] (1907) The disturbing story of the dancing pig. Le Cochon Danseur.](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/BU4W858uiGY/mqdefault.jpg)
Dee and Dum in the 1933 version are the stuff of nightmares.
They look like one of the monsters from “little nightmares”
Search up 1933 Humpty Dumpty since he was in the film but not the video
Indeed, they’re.
@@mr.mcmeme2638 you mean the twin chefs?
So is the Cheshire Cat
wtf, I didn't know there was an old live action version
Several starting 1903
Sim, mas a original do filme de 1951 foi o live action que aconteceu somente para os produtores, com Kathryn Beaumont interpretando a Alice
Buck Dancer yep first adaption was 1903, first ‘full length’ adaption was 1915.
Same
Ya there was
Interesting how Disney's Alice character is so similar in attitude to the 33 version. Also what stands out is how iconic the Disney music is compared to the earlier one. So many great little themes.
The 1951 music.
It is like Disney made it on purpose, the cartoon version of the live action film. Now they are doing the live actions of the cartoons. But this adaption is better and more faithful to the “original” than the modern ones 😂
The 1933 one is the most faithful. The Disney one is sanitized
Not really since Alice seems pretty different in the 1933 version
@@GageTheMatewielGurl0:49 they did the same position
I've seen all of them. 1931, 1953, 1988, 2009, 2010, and all the newer ones after that with Johnny Depp as Mad Hatter. They're all pretty cool in their own way
Don't forget the 90's Disney Channel show "Adventures in Wonderland'
What about the one that was made in 2016
Don’t forget the 1999 version! I feel visually it’s more faithful to the novels and includes more characters from Through the Looking Glass.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice_in_Wonderland_(1999_film)
The 1985 one with the giant Jabberwocky puppet will always be my favorite.
2010 is the best
Fun Fact: One actor who made it into both of these versions was Sterling Holloway, who played the Chesire cat in '51 and the Frog footman in '33 even though that isn't in this video.
1933 seems like it was the Avatar of it's era.
So many practical effects done so right so early in cinema.
Wizard of Oz was only 6 years later.
I didn't know that movies in 30's had fascinating visual effects for its era
Check out what Buster Keaton was doing in the 20s in Sherlock Jr.
1951 of course! I was pretty Suprised to see that the 1933 one for the Walrus and the Carpenter was animated....and pretty darker then the Disney one.
Also was Animated by Harman-Ising.
I like both. But black and white movies absolutely have my heart, they're fascinating to watch.
Same
1933 was clearly a huge inspiration for D artists in 1951. Same with 1946 La Belle et la Bete french film for 1991.
"Inspiration" 😂
Bro, the 1933 one is fucking trippy as hell
Maybe like the book it's based on...
Both versions are good imo and I loved how the live action versions from 1933 and 1915 had costumes that look very similar to the ones in the original novel. My personal favorite is the 1955 and 2010 remakes.
The rabbit in 1933 is just a furry.
shut. up.
@@pepijn1539 say that again or you will get the fist
He's also a furry in the 1903 verison.
In the 33’ one i love how the bottle says not poison like ah yes I’ll drink this mystery liquid that wants me to trust it’s not poison 😂
It's a visual shorthand for Alice's inner thoughts in the book:
It was all very well to say “Drink Me,” but the wise little Alice was not going to do that in a hurry. “No, I ’ll look first,” she said, “and see whether it’s marked ‘poison’ or not.” For she had read several nice little stories about children who had got burnt, and eaten up by wild beasts, and other unpleasant things, all because they would not remember the simple rules their friends had taught them, such as, that a red-hot poker will burn you if you hold it too long; and that if you cut your finger very deeply with a knife, it usually bleeds; and she had never forgotten that, if you drink much from a bottle marked “poison,” it is almost certain to disagree with you sooner or later.
I woke up one night when I was a kid and the tv was on amc and the 33’ version was on. That was creepiest movie I’ve seen and it was made for kids?!?
I definitely like the older and spookier versions best! Way more enchanting and closer to the actual story! Most def prefer the 1933 version!
The 1933 version is- nightmare fuel.
Still amazing though. The combination of animation and real life is ok but- man those special affects seemed like something that wouldn’t have been available until the 40s.
Ok but the caterpillar saying "WHO ARE YOU-" in the 33 version genuinely terrified me.
Even in the 20s some movies had pretty amazing special effects. Check out Ben Hurr from 1925.
The caterpillar, and EVERY creatures/people in this movie are truly terrifying !
1951 is pure magical.
It's all so beautiful to look at too. Amazing,fluid animation
What about 1933
@@gambler942 a bad trip in a good way
Yep
Why is Alice always so calm when she’s literally falling down a hole leading to what, the middle of the Earth? Likeee-💀💀💀
dodson went out of his way to make alice a marysue
Because she is dreaming.
She's more calm in the 1933 Verison.
In many parts I prefer the 1933 version, such as the "Drink me, not poison" part. Hahaha. I've always wondered how Alicia could be trusted to drink that without knowing if it was poisonous or something, now it makes more sense.
In the book, she thinks to look for a label marked "poison," because if one drinks from a bottle marked "poison," it's bound to disagree with one sooner or later. In Disney's version, she actually says this out loud.
Charlotte Henry who played Alice also played Bo-Peep in the Laurel and Hardy masterpiece - March of the Wooden Soldiers. Wonderful actress!
Yes it was a pleasant surprise to to her 2 wonderful fantasy movies.
1933 special effects seemed ahead of their time
The whole movie is triptastic nightmare fuel but I applaud the studio for doing their best with the technology that was available at the time
1933's Cheshire Cat is so cool looking!!!! I'd love to have one that looks just like him...
Makes me think of American McGee's Alice.
In the 1966 Hanna-Barbera "hip" animated version, the Cheshire Cat was voiced by Sammy Davis Jr.!
1933 version is a masterpiece.
Sim
The 1985 2-part made-for-TV movie of Alice in Wonderland and Through the Looking Glass is arguably the best adaptation ever made.
Hmm, never noticed how Lewis Carroll's name is misspelled in the title card of the Disney version. Surprised no one has fixed that.
It’s a funny old typo.
*Misspelt.
The DVD commentary notes this and digitally adds the L.
Demasiadas secuencias fílmicas idénticas a la versión de 1933 en la película de 1951, debió haber puesto en los créditos el nombre de Norman McCleod porque no es una adaptación del libro de Lewis Carrol lo que hizo Disney, sino una versión animada de la película de 1933.
¡¡No sabía eso!!, waaa que buen comentario aclaratorio
@@michellelopez7880 No creo la verdad
1951 best
The 1933 version is terrifying 😳
the twins give me the creeps
Same- and it was supposed to be for children?
The 1933 version looks SUPER CREEPY! Total NIGHTMARE FUEL!
Watch 1903 and 1915 version
the 1933 version is more trippy and surealistic.
My jaw genuinely dropped in horror at the sight of tweedle dee and tweedle dum. Idc if this was 90, 100, or 1000 years ago, who would approve of this ghastly rendition? Who I ask?
Interesting how.much structure Disney lifted from the 33 version. Dee and Dum were never in the original Wonderland book, but were in Through The Looking Glass.
They’re both ensemble dark horses in many adaptations of both books.
when Disney was doing the movie, he told his people to use through the looking glass as well though they only ended up using Dee and Dum and Walrus and The Carpenter.
O de 1933 é um verdadeiro pesadelo e o de 1951 é um verdadeiro clássico da Disney!
During the making of Alice in wonderland (1933).
Producer 1: Hey, the director we hired just quit some weeks ago and we can not find any replacement.
Producer 2: Don't worry, I know someone who can help us, he is known in the industry as H.P. Lovecraft.
Thus, Alice in Wonderland (1933) was born 😂😂😂
I can't decide if that flamingo in 1933 was a real, live one or a real dead one and that scares me...
I think they use both. Plus rubber ones.
1951 was the one I watched as a child it was my favorite❤️
Ummm I love the 1951 movie but 1933 looks incredibly interesting
Tops is the book of course.
Then the Disney cartoon
Then the 1985 and 1998 miniseries versions.
"Drink Me Not Poison". That's exactly what a poisoner WOULD write on a bottle!
The animated movie and the 1985 versions are the only ones that get it right. The Queen of Hearts IS NOT The Red Queen. They are two separate characters.
The Tweedles will now invade my nightmares.
you have to wonder if Disney just used the imagery from the 1933 version, it's so similar
1933's best Alice film ever.
Nah I like the 1951
@@She.lovesGod me too.
I love the 1951 version, best movie ever but I’m pretty sure I’m the only person in the world who likes ‘33
Gran trabajo! Saludos desde Argentina! 🇦🇷💙🤍
That's pretty impressive vfx for a film from 1933.
51 is better in my opinion. The first one I actually saw was the Hello Kitty one, in 1993, but I watched it when I was like 5 - 7, then I saw the 1951, out I was on CZcams, and the first scene I saw was the doorknobs scene and the scene where Alice flooded the room with her tears.
Maybe I should add the massive gigantic nuclear explosion sound effects to it.
Re turbio la película del 33 😐
es lo especial de la de 1933
De echo el creador era un pedofilo
@@qp9613 Se llama Norman Z. Mcleod, pero no estoy seguro de si era un pedofilo
@@el_mismisimo_sr.x he was talking about Lewis Carroll author of Alice’s Adventures Under Ground manuscript and the Alice books 📚 Alice’s adventures in Wonderland and through the looking glass and what Alice found there and the nursery Alice a shortened version of Alice’s adventures in wonderland with things explained by the author ✍️
@@el_mismisimo_sr.x no no se refiere a Norman se refiere a Lewis Carroll
People complain about no originality and that all they can do is remakes but they've been doing it for almost 100 years.
I’ve seen some Alice in Wonderland Versions ,1903,1910,1933,1951,2010
1951 is actually really beautiful
1933 is a nightmare but I still love it
1903 is only 10 minutes long so I can’t rank it (😅)
2010 is different but I love it as much as 1951
The old live action Alice in wonderland was released in 1933, Walt Disney Alice in wonderland was released in 1951,Alice Through a looking glass was released in 1998,the game called American McGee's Alice was released in 2000 and new live action of Alice in wonderland was released in 2010,Alice madness returns was released in 2011 and the last one Alice Through the looking glass THE NEW ONE was released in 2016.
I didn’t know this existed! Omg I gotta watch the 1933 version!
1933 cat is my sleep paralysis demon
Pete’s Dragon( 1977 and 2016) Side by Side Comparison
I didn't even know the 1933 one existed.
2:16 Growing and smal but 1951 disney, version best
2:15 That Growing effect was really good for the 30s
Omg didn’t know Alice had more adaptations
I thought only Pinocchio did WHAT XD
Probably because I’m a Pinocchio fan due to my pfp but still XD
I love Alice In Wonderland so much and never knew this help.. XD
I mean it's a popular story that is public domain, same as Pinocchio.
I mean is a popular story. What did u expect?
It's cool to see this. I have seen them before, but I actually grew up with the 1985 version. The actress who plays Alice and I are 2 days apart in real life! I remember my teacher made a little quiz for us after the 2 day TV movie aired, and then we read Alice in Wonderland in the classroom! Those were fun times! You know, I wonder if teachers today do projects like that-it makes learning fun! In fact, my high school history teacher was just as creative. In 1989, we did a report on social studies using Billy Joel's "We Didn't Start the Fire" as a reference. I probably wouldn't have retained the info half as well if it didn't become a fun project to learn with a catchy new tune and relating it to our studies
Cheshire cat is creepy in both versions
극장판 이상한 나라의 앨리스의 대모험 (1933) VS. 극장판 이상한 나라의 앨리스의 대모험 (1951)
I haven't read all 422 comments, but must comment that both versions owe a lot to Sir John Tenniel's original illustrations. New illustrations are out there, but a lot of us grew up with Tenniel. He also penned cartoons for the magazine Punch.
I remember this movie and it's on Disney plus but it's my first favorite Disney movie along with Mary Poppins. I read this book and it's also a live action movie on Disney plus.
10:45
The End
A Paramount Picture
A Universal Release
A Walt Disney Production
Made in Hollywood, U.S.A.
Distributed by Universal Pictures and Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures.
"NOT poison" how convincing
The Disney version is good, but being more family friendly it is no where near as striking and surreal as the 1933 version, i've always prefered the original. Folk tales are meant to be dark
1933 is different than the 1951 film, it’s because the drink in the 1933 makes her grow while the 1951 makes her small, and the cookies in the 1933 makes her small while the 1951 makes her grow
I noticed that as well. In every adaptation I’ve seen, and I’ve seen a lot adaptations, the Drink would shrink Alice while the Food would make her grow (Except for the Rabbit’s carrots in the Disney version which shrunk her for some reason)
どっちも可愛いわ
My favourite was the musical version with Fiona Fullerton as Alice, Michael Crawford as the White Rabbit, and a cast of many more distinguished British celebrities
And Peter Sellers as the March Hare! ^_^
I will concede that Disney's version had the more memorable musical score and some dashes of visual brilliance, but overall, the 1933 version is my favorite.
As a sidebar, I haven't seen anyone mention the brilliant, but sadly neglected, 1972 version with Fiona Fullerton as Alice.
The 193x one is terrifying
Wish i could watch the full movie to see how scary it is.
Pretty sure it’s on here somewhere
7:16 It's amazing how the cat from the new remakes it's so inspired by the 33.
Esta pelicula de 1933 parece una pesadilla y la pelicula de Disney de 1951 es una animación muy magica
I didn’t know this existed but wow 🤩 the graphics are far way more realistic than today’s stupid CGI 😱 for 1933 it looks timeless
Geez the oyster thing, I forgot how dark that was
9:44 wait is that a real flamingo in the 1933 version????
It was. 🦩😔
There is also a version from 1903 if anyone is curious
THEY USED A REAL FLAMINGO FOR THE CROQUET?!?!
Was the timing really identical? or was one of these edited to fit the other?
Slightly fitted 😉
for the 30’s the 1933 one isn’t bad, some of the make-up is off putting to say the least, but not bad for the times.
The door scene was different. 33 has doors open to the right. 51, left. Didn't think it was
Cool Beautiful cartoon and movie Video
the cheshire cat looks like something out of Pet Semetary....
Fun Fact: Walt Disney was inspired by the 1933 Alice to create the 1951 Alice.
I'm pretty sure the 1949 also inspired it
Alice did not have to listen to her history lesson at all. Her sister made a mistake by teaching her a history lesson during summer vacation. Alice had a very good and sweet time bonding with Dinah and sleeping with her together while she was dreaming about Wonderland.
Uts sad to think that the Disney one was considered a failure. When the art work is so beautiful. The 1933 looks beautiful too, a masterpiece in his time. And we can see how heavily influenced the Disney one.
8:05 the 1933 version..imagine seeing THAT as a kid! Scary as hell!!
Surprisingly few differances.
For 1933? That's some impressive sets and designs... Well... Okay Metropolis was here 10 years before...But still.
Not bad.
Of course... How can you copete with 2D animation at it's best?
Alice In Wonderland (1933 and 1951)
Courtesy of Universal Pictures through EKMA Ltd. (1933 version only) and Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures through Walt Disney Pictures and Walt Disney Animation Studios (1951 version only).
©1933 Paramount Pictures Corporation. Renewed: ©1958 EKMA Ltd.
©1951 Disney Enterprises Inc.
©2022 Universal City Studios, LLC. & Disney Enterprises Inc.
Fun facts: Disney and Universal Pictures also produced several films including Marvel Cinematic Universe starring The Incredible Hulk (since Universal Pictures produced this film way back in 2008). Additionally, Paramount Pictures and Disney also co-produced most of Indiana Jones films, Marvel Cinematic Universe films, Popeye (1980 feature film) and Dragonslayer (1981 film), and also some of 20th Century Studios co-produced films with Paramount including: Titanic (1997) and Terminator: Dark Fate (2019 film), among others. The Marvel Cinematic Universe film rights was transferred from Paramount Pictures (2008-2013) to Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures (2013-present). Additionally, Universal Pictures and Disney also produced the Eastrail 177 film Trilogy.
i didn't know there was a movie that disney's alice in wonderland was inspirade/based on... I thought they made everything based directly from the book, i'm actually kinda surprised...
Btw, movies from this age didn't use CGI much, so most of the characters just look like something straight from my nightmares
edit: i just find out there's another one from 1903. LIKE... THAT'S EVEN MORE TERIYFYING, search that up, the images are just creepy
As they didn't have "computers" at all, they couldn't have CGI, now could they? They would sometimes use a black screen the way we use a green screen today to superimpose the character over some other background. But for the most part, it was "practical" effects or nothing at all.
Is the jabberwock in the 33 version?
Sterling Holloway plays the frog in the 1933 version, and the voice of the Cheshire Cat in the ‘51 version.
I need to see them all.
The 1933 one is so admirable in the insane cramming of both books. It covers virtually every character that ever appears in both stories in under 80 minutes.
And I think it captures the oddness very very well.
Unfortunately Charlotte Henry is very miscast. Alice should always be british.
Fun Fact: there was going to be an 1939 animation of the story, but it never happened, due to possibly being too dark and gritty.
Both of them are nightmare fuel in my book
I like both versions
1933 is my favourite but yeah poor flamingos however it was the time back then can’t blame ‘em