Holy Heck! I Didn't Expect The 2022 Toyota Tundra To Put Up THESE Numbers! Ep. 4
Vložit
- čas přidán 14. 10. 2021
- Thanks to Keeps for sponsoring this video! Head to www.keeps.com/TFLTruck to get 50% off your first order of Keeps hair loss treatment.
( tfl-studios.com/ ) Check out our new spot to find ALL our content, from news to videos and our podcasts! Just how quick is the brand new, twin-turbocharged Toyota Tundra from 0 to 60? Andre tests both non-hybrid and hybrid models in this road trip video!
( / tflcar ) Visit our Patreon page to support the TFL team!
Watch more videos from TFL Studios:
The Fast Lane Truck ( / tfltruck )
The Fast Lane Car ( / tflcar )
TFLoffroad ( / tfloffroad )
TFLbike ( / @tflbike )
TFLnow ( / tflnow )
TFLclassics ( / tflclassics )
TFLtalk ( / tfltalk )
TFL Podcasts:
TFL Talkin' Cars Podcast ( tflcar.libsyn.com/ )
TFL Talkin' Trucks Podcast ( tfltruck.libsyn.com/ )
#Toyota #Tundra #0to60 - Auta a dopravní prostředky
Thanks to Keeps for sponsoring this video! Head to www.keeps.com/TFLTruck to get 50% off your first order of Keeps hair loss treatment.
So, I take it Toyota let you take this one home. Does that mean it is production spec and not pre-production?
Hold traction button down; Activate tow haul and give us a better 0 -60mph please thanks in advance. Oh I’m a tundra owner so I know some tricks about Toyota
I'm so sad no more v8
@Enough the mpg included the full throttle 0-60 tests. So it's probably in the same 21-23 highway range. But it also has more torque at 1600rpms than the Ford 7.3 has a 4000! And the hybrid goes even higher. V8s are dead. Not long and diesels are dead too. The turbo gas hybrid will out pull them, get better mpg, and cost far less to maintain. (I own an f250 Diesel BTW). I'm impressed by both the F-150 powerboost and the tundra. The tundra may replace my f250. It's a better work truck than an F-150.(much bigger running gear, transmission, axles, etc). And I don't daily driver my truck I just use it to tow and haul. F150 is probably the better commuter car. But both are pretty impressive. The Ford power inverter system is really compelling too! But I don't think the rest of the truck is up to the work load I need.
@adam Honda
Yup wait till those turbos go out, big $$
Andre, you're an awesome CZcamsr. I thoroughly enjoy your videos my man.
Thank you for the kind words!
Andre- Great videos, love the channel content all the time- one suggestion! As many times as you guys do MPG tests , most manufactures do make a place to hang the gas cap on the fuel doors. This protects the paint from scratches and potential dings from the cap bouncing against the sides of your vehicles- especially your new Tundra on first fill up😎
We want to see the Toyota Hybrid vs your Ford F150 Hybrid, drag race and ike gauntlet!
I got $100 on the Powerboost.
@@Brian_195 I'll be rooting for the American brand Ford for sure
@@Brian_195 I'll double that with foodstamps
The F150 will continue to take the Tundra's lunch money on any open road they happen to meet on lol.
I was really hoping someone was gonna take one of these to Hidden Falls Adventure Park! Way to go Andrey!
I took the truck there but did not get a chance to really off-road the new Tundra at the park. Hoping to do that in the near future.
Why’s everyone so concerned about how fast a pickup goes zero to 60? Are you gonna be drag racing in your pickup? Everyone’s complaining that it’s a second slower. It’s a freaking second, you’ll get to wherever you’re getting a second later. 🤷🏾♂️
Right!?
Its a performance metric. The majority of truck owners pay attention to this. You do you, go buy a truck.
😆 🤣
Funny thing also is the people who also complain just use their trucks as pavement princess
"Are you gonna be drag racing in your pickup?"
Me and my Lightning: Yes. Yes I am.
Showing LOVE for the channel thank you for another great video once again. Have a Blessed day everyone
Just drove from south texas to ft worth texas 485 miles on my new 6.2 custom trailboss 10 speed and avg 22mpg driving 75-80 mph super happy with it !!
Tieota will never see those mpg
Really expected a little better MPG, my 5.7 double cab just got 17-20mpg on a trip from Houston to Minneapolis and back, so 2500mile trip. 07 tundra with 270k 2wd trd
Toyota needs to put the Tundra on a diet if they want to be competitive in performance.
You are the first person I have ever seen claim a Tundra can exceed 15 mpg, those I know with them say 11 and 13.
@@Steve-yr5vi I have pictures and proof, it has done it many a times, also has 275-65-20s. Guess I got a good one
BS. You must have driven 55 because no way in hell did you get 20mpg. PURE BS
@@02hreblue30 I have an '08 5.7 Tundra and it actually gives me better mileage when I cruise above 75 mph, not so when I drive under 60 mph.
My 2018 GMC crew cab just got 21.7 on a 1200 mile road trip. Oh and in Texas we drive 80 mph
On reg gas!!!
my 2015 chevy high country with 6.2 v8 has great power and even hauling 500lbs of tools consistently averages 19.2 mpg in mixed driving and sounds great with borla exhaust wouldnt trade it for a v6 I don't care how many turbos it's got!
The 6.2 is a strong engine, no doubt. As a 3.5 TT owner it is the one V8 NA engine other than the 5.0 that I respect. I know the 6.4 RAM is strong but I've never encountered one.
I drove from TN to WI about 650 miles and my 16-f150 v8 fx4 avg 22.5 miles per gallon with some mountain climbing on I-75 in TN & KY .
I use to travel a lot between Dallas,TX and Lafayette, LA, that 5.0 v8 also avg 21.5 per gallon.
4 MPG more than my 2015 Tundra lifted 33” tires isn't enough
Get the V8 back Toyota or I'm moving to Ford coyote
have fun with the Ford coyote oil consumption issues
@@wiks101 Well known problem, Ford started using lazer welded cylinder liners in place of tried and true cast iron press fit liners, nothing has been the same since, heavy oil usage. Lots of hoops to go thru, only to get a new engine with same problem. Ford has ruined the Coyote.
4 x 38 gallons. That's how much you are losing at the pump to this non hybrid model and he was doing 0-60 runs that likely brought down that average. I'm sure this truck gets 20+ mpg easy
@@beexiong2995 I agree.
@bee. Xiong
You don’t know the mpgs it will get, just guessing
6:00 Let’s Go Brandon!!!
Based
@@lesterparker1594 informed. Not mislead. By MSM
I’m a bit of a Brandon fan myself
Woot woot
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Still searching for this ever elusive "world beater" that was hyped up for 3 years.
I have the world beater= Ram Ecodiesel, averaged over 30 mpg for 125,000 mi. 1 second slower to 60, though.
@@formerice do they still offer that?
Well, 1. Is any manufacturer going to say something like “our truck will definitively be middle of the pack among its competition; 2. I’m sure the Toyota people feel like they’ve built the best truck; and 3. Best truck/world beater is very subjective. What are you looking for? A TRX-fighter for $50K?
@@aggiewoodie thank you! Finally someone with common sense posted. Subjective is key and even the TRD is not going to go against the trex or raptor. Probably more of a tremor or rebel competitor. Though I do think people are looking at real world fuel economy here vs posted economy with other brands. in my exipience most vehicles come in under epa numbers.
Foreals!!!!!
Ford F-150: hold my hat
I don’t understand the loss of any great V8 to the V6 turbo world when there is the simple addition of a 10 speed now that would make everyone very happy
10 speed is junk should've stayed with a 5 speed but put a 2 speed differential
CVT tundra is the way to go
The 2021 was a 6 speed, not 5.
I think the 10 speed In the f150 is great! Although I like the 5.0 and the power it has, also the 10 speed keeps it in its power band up top, it just does not have low end. The low end of the 3.5 and the 2.7 is just ridiculous stock. The power is just instant. 20 mph and you roll into the accelerator and it just burns the tires! I’m a Chevy guy. But yes 10 speed makes a huge different, and I’m also a v8 lover. Simple and reliable👍🏼
@@roberthansen7610 I'm talking bout the older one way older one.
For a truck that was so hyped up, for it to only get 19.3 mpg is a joke.
If you can’t afford the gas buy a Camry
I still haven't seen a big pick up pull a 25mpg till this day. But that 19mpg is pretty impresive for a big pick up. Just saying.
@@samuelsanchez-uj6ui not about money.
@@MastersOfMask big? Not exactly. You can get 20 mpg from a 2020 6.7 PS F250. This truck was held back for for years because it “wasn’t ready”. Not impressed for a truck that should be exceptional.
@@MastersOfMask My 4x4 Crew Cab 2.7 will get 25 MPG easily...but only at 55-60 MPH. At 75 it's lucky to hit 20. I usually actually get the same or better mileage around town as on the interstate, this Tundra may be similar that way.
Anyone else notice how at 5:09 he let go instead of letting the pump stop automatically? Check their other videos - the pump stops automatically while their hand is holding the lever up but for some reason he let off early and it still only got 19 mpg. They even zoomed in on it
He said he was topping off, don't know if that's what your referencing.
Tbh I’ll take it that’s great for non hybrid excited for the hybrid
I wonder what the break in time is on these. I've seen f150s take 500 miles before the truck will make any power at all
I demand a V8
Vtec > v8
Get a F-150 5.0 bro.
Toyota dropping the V8 is crazy. I got my Tundra last year...no turbo fan here.
@Jack K IMHO the gas savings is not great enough to brag about considering it will most likely not be as trouble free and last as long as a non-turbo package.
@Jack K I am Canadian...no EPA here BUT we have TRUJOKE.
I consistently get ~20 MPG in my 2008 Ram 1500 regular cab 4.7/6 speed manual in mostly rural/hiway driving. 13 years and modern tech and here we are...
Wow shocker, a truck that weighs 1500 lbs less and has no power gets similar mpg.
@@jonde4445 almost 14 years difference in technology….and the 4.7 makes 310hp, good for the time. 0~60 is 7 second range, about the same as the Tundra. And my truck weights about 4,7++ pounds, so the difference is probably more likely about 800 pounds.
@jon de
What it proves is that tieota is still way behind the times in fuel efficiency, and prob a lot of other things also
Isn't the F150 3.5 non hybrid faster?
Don't let this distract you from the fact that Hector is gonna be running 3 Honda Civic's with spoon engines. On top of that he just came into Harry's and ordered 3 t66 turbo's with NOS's and a Motec System Exhaust.
Can you put t66 turbos on the new Tundra?
Who are you!!
Brain Spillmen!!!
Sounds like a cereal killer name, is that who you are!! Dont come around here again!!!
This is bullsh#t!!! You work for Harry right!!
Yeah!!
You were just fired!!!
If memory serves me correctly didn't yall test a limited F150 hybrid in Colorado that done like 6.2 0-60? If so, I wonder what the weight difference is between the hybrid tundra and hybrid f150
Andre's 2021 F-150 hybrid did 0-60 in 5.61 seconds at a mile above sea level.
@@rebelcitysports1outlook186 oh yes that's right. I was meaning when they raced the limited vs the raptor.
Because the Ford 3.5 TT is a maniacal beast of an engine! That the Tundra isn't spinning the rears off the line when they floor it tells me Toyota is limiting torque in the lower gears, this is easier on the transmission and will help with longevity. Ford learned that one the hard way, they do the same to a degree, but I'll still break the rears loose.
No kidding. My 3.5 TT rips the tires when in sport mode without brake boosting it. Brake boosting only makes it spin thee tires like crazy!
If I want a good launch I usually get the truck to roll a few feet then push the throttle the rest of the way so it just chirps the tires (repeatedly with traction control) and pulls hard.
If I really need a good launch I put it in 4WD AUTO
Fords Sport mode in the 400hp Expedition sets up 4A automatically. You can re set it to 2wd by pressing 2wd after your in sport mode. Yeah doing nothing else ie traction nanny on it will light up the 285’s on 22’s😳.
These are Preproduction Tundras they no doubt have nanny code in play.
My 08 4WD averages 16 MPG. I live up a 400 ft. hill in 1 mile that, for short trips, really skews the MPG. I bought my neighbors 02 Prius a while back for a 'short trip' car (gave it to the daughter and now it's long gone) and I really liked how when I went down the hill I didn't lose all that energy to brake heat. I can get 18 to 19 MPG with my truck on the highway. I don't really need a new truck but if the MPG of the 22 Tundra blew my socks off I would probably get one. So far these numbers just aren't doing it for me. And the hybrid doesn't look like its designed for improving MPG as much as improving towing.
Real world legit review! 💯 I am s fan
That 0-60 wasn’t better than my 2012 F150 ecoboost FX4 crew cab.
20 mpg unloaded. ?
not great is it
My wifes rdx, when we first got it, it was getting 18mpg at 80mph. 2k miles later it was getting about 24mpg doing the same thing. Broken in thing is real
@@kidamere2408 Not good at all.
@@user-yq6ov6ow7l agreed. My Jaguar XJ8 went from 26 when I fieldstone for it to 30 mpg. I just started to drive it with less of a heavy foot. Car had 82k miles when I bought it.
It looked like that Texas Heat was killing you. We are getting a cold front tonight. Great job on all the videos keep up the good work!
excuses
Previous owner of 2008 Limited Crewmax 4x4. Living in the deep south with totally flat roads I would always average 19mpg. Anytime I went up north to Georgia that would easily drop to 16.
Expecting better 0-60, it’s actually worse than the outgoing V8 with the 6 speed transmission. Wonder if Toyota put some kind anti slip programed into the computer no letting the truck deliver all it power early?
TFL 0-60 is always a bit off since they are in very high altitude.
@@HyperXism This test was done in Texas.
Next excuse?
@T-boe the first I really don't have a bone in this race as I drive a 6.6 Duramax, but once again, I bet the 6.8 seconds is not at high altitude. I would love to see the official numbers though. Believe me, I think the 5.7 is probably one of the best engines built.
@T-boe the first exactly what I was thinking. I’m keeping my 2020 a minimum of 10 years like my last Tundra
v6tt are not really significant gas savers over v8 in my experience with the 3.5L ecoboost, don't know about the 2.7. It is more powerful than a naturally aspirated v8, and if you drive conservatively, you will get maybe 1 mpg combined over a v8 and 1-2 mpg less when towing.
Toyota could lower the rear axle to 3.73 and add the 10speed to the current 5.7 v8 and get decent mpg, like 17 or 18 combined like the Titan. They have a few other v8s, like the 4.6, 5.0, 4.7L that they could put in other configurations, like a doublecab 8ft bed as an SR trim work truck and sell way more. Goodness they need to hire better market researchers!
The 2.7 from Ford is really good on fuel better thsn the 3.5.I have owned both
@@jasonbrushett3 did both engines age well?
The 2.7 had great power and mileage. Actually stock I felt like it was quicker to 60 than the 3.5. Can’t go wrong with v8 reliability. The ecoboosts do well but it’s no question there is more issues with the ecoboosts than the 5.0. Knowing Toyota I hope they kept their reliability higher on the list when putting together the tundra motor
@@16jeepbuddy oh I'm sure they did. Toyota's not going to tarnish their name after they finally got their foot in th door of th full-size truck market. They're finally getting a lot of people to accept their Tundra's that normally wouldn't & I don't think they'd be careless & mess that up. My only thing is, that's th ugliest fkn truck I've ever seen! It makes th previous model look beautiful & it was ugly too!😖🍻
@@gizzy2403 they most certainly did.The only issue was a minor leak around the oil pan.My dealer repaired under warranty just as it was barely noticeable. I have a 3.5 now in my current 19.I had a 15 with 2.7 and a 17 with 3.5 and both went over 60k miles no issues. My friend has a 2.7 with over 120000 miles and only issue was oil pan leak
Very nice, seems to have a smooth shift during acceleration
This series is great for early morning before work!
Were the two full throttle 0-60 runs included in that MPG reading?
Yes.
@@TFLtruck
Impressive👍
20mpg hwy? How is that so much better than a 2021? That's not good AT ALL.
agreed, I'm getting 15 city, so 17 city in the new Tundra is not amazing in any way. If it was 19 MPG city, then we can start to be impressed.
yeah better then the old tundra, but it was one of the worst efficient trucks out there, so this is "better" but still not even close to what alot of the other brands are doing
Yea it I thought the next gen would be class leading when it comes to mpg
@@tewksburydriver8624 a few added mpg’s for a more expensive untested platform…I’m going to stick with the tried and true V8 gas guzzler. Besides I like the new interior but not the exterior enough to drop 50-60 grand
It makes more power and way more torque than the V8 while getting 20mpg. If it got worse mpg y'all would complain, if it had less power y'all would complain, it has the better of both worlds and y'all complain. I don't get it. Is it a just V8 thing?
I hate this new trend on rating new vehicles on their 0-60 times like most don’t care. We’re not drag racing everyday, especially a truck 😂.
Not bad. It will be interesting to see any improvements as the engine breaks in.
Putting in premium is really gonna HURT PEOPLES WALLETS
Oh ya that extra 6-10 dollars per fill up is going to bankrupt them lol
Especially with Biden’s new travel tax plan if that garbage goes through
It doesn’t require premium. 87 recommended.
I stopped worrying about gas prices, If people are concerned about gas prices they should only drive hybrids
@@sheepdogs762mm Here is a video about this worrying thing. czcams.com/video/Opxp3u1SGIQ/video.html
2.79 a gallon😳 I miss those days. Lets go Brandon! Keep up the good work.
Most of Texas be like that
fckin unbelievable, LGB
#fjb
Great Video! In terms of coverage of the Tundra 2022 compared to other auto youtubers, you guys hit it out of the park
Thank you for the kind words and for watching!
The mpg is better than the previous truck. Best I ever got on our 2016 SR5 TRD Off Road was 16.7 mpg.
Try it after the first oil change. The engine limits power till broken in. Even the new tacomas do that.
Bet it’s no different. Disappointing is an understatement. Copied ford left and right but can’t beat the best
@@freedomisntfree_44 the best? In what way?
@@loganamurray64 uhh sales lol does the new tundra lead in any segment?
@@KParks reliability
@@loganamurray64 towing,payload, sales…0-60 😂 I have a Ford and a Toyota btw with the ford having more miles and less cost to maintain/ things I’ve replaced. Move along
Bruhh I have a 2007 5.7 with a trd intake and trd tune from an Toyota approved specialist and that thing runs 0-60 under 6’s all dayyyy longggg. And the 5.7 doesn’t have to work very hard doing it so you know the 5.7 gunna last twice as long.
@Jack K As a Titan owner the 4 cats is huge problem. It’s what kills the Titan engines haha. So the fact this has 4 as well is quite disappointing. I was looking into one of these now I might go with the older 5.7.
Yeah but you haven't ever seen 20 mpg...
@@Bru946 I'm keeping my 2010 5.7 after watching all these videos. These are not the "world beater" specs we were all waiting for. If you end up putting premium in for towing most fuel savings will be lost and they weren't great to begin with.
@@ultraneight the eco diesel does way better , but wish they would of just put the tech into a more efficient V8 , v6 engines belong in midsize vehicles not full size trucks imo
@Jack K why not has 1 or 2 like most vehicles 😂
I'm curious to see what the MPG will end up being while towing a big travel trailer compared to the outgoing V8.
As an owner of the old V8, It can't be worse
Sounds dang good
I’m thinking pre production truck with Toyota nanny code definitely fully active especially in a press test truck. I never had the 5.7 only the factory juiced up 07 4.7. I’d bet the new engines are lighter weight than the old 5.7. 1000% way way way better mileage in the most common use of near empty Tundra.. Yes the turbo engines burn fuel like crazy towing heavy and fast. But for 1/2 ton trucks thats like .0009% of the buyers in most cases.
I didn’t buy Toyota in 2019 first time in 27yrs because Toyota was just too freaking ancient and straight up horrendous on mileage at a premium price. This truck and the new Sequoia are BADLY needed. So far my Expedition has me thinking I probably had my last Toyota. My wife’s car plug-in hybrid C level business interior crushes anything Toyota offered in 2016. Zero issues fantastic car.
So this old Toyota Fan needs to see some serious creativity, cool stuff, great power, mileage etc, to go back to Toyota.
So these are the numbers on premium fuel, gonna be less on 87 i imagine. Iam really not impressed. Love the interior tho, pretty nice. The red on the PRO is sweet
Do you guys know if they gonna have 6 sits Option with the crew max hybrid engine?
Try the mpg test later on 87? If it can take 87
Toyota has an aggressive traction control. My old 14 5.7 Tundra, I had to hold traction button long enough to turn off all the Nannie’s. This new tundra looks great imo. Would have loved to see a turbo v8 but hey, I can dream lol
I think they actually had some Limited Edition one with either supercharged or turbo V8. Just for like a year or two. It wasnt a big seller so they must not have figured it was worth it to keep making them.
@@korndawggy1801 they offered a supercharger on any 5.7 model for a few years. It was 505hp 550tq. In a 2wd regular cab short bed (a configuration they haven't had in a long time), it would run a 4.4 second 0-60. But it didn't really do anything else very well - who buys a regular cab short bed 2wd truck? My guess is less than 100 were ever sold like that. Maybe less than 50.
@@MrJcjet however, you were able to get the 'blower' dealer installed until just a few years ago on any 5.7.
@@PaulSter It's still available through Magnuson. Same kit. But it's for more expensive. When Toyota sold them they were about $3500. Now they are $7,200.
@@MrJcjet absolutely. OTOH, for someone like me whose truck is still under factory warranty, the dealer installed system did not void the warranty, so that was a big plus.
Slow af. Andre's 2021 F-150 Powerboost ran a 5.61 second 0-60 mph at a mile above sea level.
This wasn’t the Hybrid Tundra you know that right.
@@TrevDB99 6:25 he says it is
@@zach_6.813 the last run at the end of this video was the hybrid.
@@TrevDB99 watch the whole video. They run the hybrid also
I get 18.3 on my 2013 Toyota Tundra for highways miles.
must be driving slow. otherwise BS
My 2021 f150 5.0 with 3.73 rear end gets 21 mpg average including gravel roads and weekend driving.
thats pretty impressive, i get almost 17, but i have a 2012 5.0
Here I was thinking the Twin Turbo V6 would get better mileage than a typical V8 truck, it doesn't seem to, so what's the point of it?
Emissions
It’s also no faster or not even as fast as the 5.7 i Force. My 2018 full 4 door 4wd with factory standard size tires does 0 to 60 in 6.0 seconds flat and if I drive it right I average 18 mpg.
Eco-bullshit is the point of it....
@@warriorwarrior6999 well the current tundra epa numbers are 13 city 17 highway. So if you are somehow able to get 18 by “driving it right” then you would be able to get 25 mpg in the new tundra. Since it gets 23 highway. So that would be a significant increase.
Well, being an outgoing 5.7 tundra owner I’m gonna tell you that’s a hell of an increase for tundra. I average 13-14 mpg and have owned my truck for 10 years
Nice video,what about the gas regular or premium?
Used premium fuel for all these tests. But 87 octance (as a minimum) is required.
@@TFLtruck do you know what toyota recommends as far as fuel for the tundra? Is premium recommended or are there any benefits towards it?
Any notable difference in road noise btwn trd pro and the other non trd trims?
What people don’t realize is that with the turbo you have to buy better gas so it defeats the purpose of better mpg when your paying the same for something that won’t last as long
@joey place
You are so wrong about that
No you don't.
@@darkdodger137 you don’t but you should if you want it to last longer.
I wonder why they didn't go with a Capless fuel fill design?
Probably because Toyota didnt want dust and dirt to get into the fuel tank
@@andyk3199 I mean, come on now, they couldn't steal ALL of Ford's ideas lol.
Don’t appreciate the ads. I pay for CZcams premium for a reason. I want this truck!
you can skip through them though since it's actually in the video
No rear flat floor equals major fail.
Our 2019 limited crewmax got 19mpg on cross country trips...Maybe the hybrid will do better?
Are they piping sound into the cab?
pretty sure, however it kinda....sorta...isnt terrible (do i like it, no....myes....nyot sure)
Yes, there is different engine sound augmentation, depending on the truck trim and drive mode.
@@TFLtruck not sure how I feel about that. I know other manufacturers have done it in the past, but it's never really sat right with me.
@@dewboy13 easy to delete
@dewboy
Of course they pipe in sound, Toyota has copied everything else from other manufacturers, they can’t come up with anything on their own
I really thought it would be high 5s low 6s.
Bet it still won’t outrun fords 2.7.
@@freedomisntfree_44 Ford= Found On Road Dead can never match Toyota reliable, Durability and Value. This Tundra equipped with the Craw Control that can conquer any terrain which the Ford couldn’t
very disappointed as well was thinking sub 6...doesnt matter the power stats if it doesnt equal real world numbers
@@321thach the tundra has hill descent not crawl control
@@321thach real off roaders never use crawl control... And this tundra is so new you never know what's gonna happen.
It should be straightforward with a boost controller to get much more
I guess I’ll wait for the prime, the gas’s so expensive in Canada and I don’t wanna go fully electric yet
Plug-in hybrid pickup is what I'm waiting for, too! Or better yet, a serial-hybrid (so fully EV with larger battery pack than plug-in hybrid but a small, range extender engine that can charge the battery as you drive to extend range, recharge if you run out of charge or even limp you along at reduced power if you are running on engine/generator only).
3-5 MPG’s better than the last outgoing model? Kinda lame.
True, Toyota has let us down.
go buy the ridgeline baby
We also have no idea how this guy drove the car, if he was using eco, brake regeneration, if most of his drive was uphill, the speed he was going etc....
Redline Review got 6.3 sec for hybrid and 6.8 for the turbo for 0-60. If you look at some of the foreign LC300 vs LC200 5.7 V8 drag race video, it seems that at least for the 0-60 or quarter mile there isn't a lot of difference between the V8 and the V6 it is afterwards that the V6 starts pulling away.
The v8 is faster 0-60 because of no turbo lag but loses out after 60
Who cares about a big trucks 0-60. Who the hell is taking this truck down a quarter mile? Here’s a better question. How much can it tow and how reliable is it?
@@lesterparker1594 If you have to ask, you wouldn't understand.
@@Reu_ag you’ve driven the new Tundra hybrid? There’s turbo lag?
@@lesterparker1594 Exactly ! the majority of Toyota buyers don't by TRUCKS for how fast they go 0-60 that's FORD people. We buy TRUCKS that last a long time without repairs.
What was your cruising speed during the road trip? 55 or 75 mph will make a big MPG difference..
Texas highway cruising speed is usually around 75. 85 out in the country, typically.
I’m a Toyota guy and was hoping that their new truck would perform better than that. 19.9 mpg isn’t acceptable with 2 turbos. Probably has a bit more torque than the hemi but the hemi v8 gets better milage
Twenty mpg on the highway?
The 5.3 and the 6.2 engines in the Chevrolet Silverado 1500 2WD trucks both get 23 mph highway per Chevrolet’s website. Both are non-turbo, regular gasoline engines.
And the 3.0 diesel gets 33 mpg highway.
Toyota may have thrown that pitch outside the strike zone.
Because of cylinder deactivation and who knows the epa could be rating them definitely since they are American based to make their sales better I personally would own a GM product after a Cruze
Ive got a bro with the chevy 5.3 full size 4x4 extended and with the dodge hemi 5.7 (4x4 extended)..both are just a few years old...the dodge does a couple mpg better on every trip...hauling or not.
I regularly see 22 plus mpg on Ford Ecoboost F150s here in planet Ford Houston.
Good luck with the multi displacement engine system time bomb.
Remove auto start/stop and cylinder deactivation and the mileage on those engines becomes noticeably worse. Can't compare diesels to gassers on economy
Nissan Armada 0-60 5.9 sec
Completely different things..apples to oranges
@@Pantelifts10 Armada weighs more and is faster. Same engine in the titan since you're stuck on apples and oranges.. V8 all day every day
The nissan is an irrelevant vehicle nobody drives. Look around. None on the roads
@@beexiong2995 that's as funny as the v6 turbo in the tundra
@@andymorris2920 nobody cares about nissans dude.. comparing the armada and titan to a Tundra laughable. Everywhere I looked it says 7-7.5sec 0-60 for a Titan btw
There is a fuel cap holder on the fuel door that was just hard to watch at the beginning
Was the test done in the hybrid or non hybrid?
I am unsure if TFLT had edited the Tundra's exhaust note (which I doubt), but at about the 2:59 mark I heard a V8 exhaust recording.
As for me with full size trucks, no V8 engine no deal. Period.
It's the fake noise played through the speakers like ford's ecoboost! What a joke right?!
I have a 2015 Ecoboost with the Sony stereo system and have yet heard the fake noise.
The truck is actually pretty quiet. But fast.
If they add "augmented engine sound" it is barely there.
Such a boomer mindset. wahhhh I want a V8 like in 1950. But, times moved on, V8's are not efficient. Period.
@@Clapxiomatic The v6 twin turbo would be fine if it was an improvement, the mpg's so far don't justify giving up one of their most reliable engines. Your attempt at an insult adds nothing to the conversation, such a gen z mindset.
@@ultraneight the v6 is a huge improvement in mpg. Keep your carburetor and distributor while you’re at it.
Still kind of bummed they didn’t keep the 5.7 as an option
And make it twin-turbo
5.7 was a major complaint due to the fact the does 5.0 has similar power and better mpgs
@@mauricemotors8207 The 5.7 had a 6 speed and 4.3 axle in an old heavy truck. If they updated with similar modern tech as the 5.0 (which now has cylinder deactivation like GM and Ram V8s), paired it to a 10 speed, and comparable gearing it would be a tip top V8. Wasn't worth the investment for Toyota at this point however.
@@mauricemotors8207 I think the trans and gearing had a lot to do with that. I'm assuming the ford was quite a bit lighter too
Put a twin turbo 5.7 under the hood & I couldn't throw my debut card fast enough.
No testers so far have been willing to tell us how the 2022 Tundra feels in normal driving compared to the outgoing 5.7 liter V8 Tundra or the Ram 1500 hemi V8. ! Does the Tundra feel slower and more lethargic in everyday driving compared to them?
The tundra hybrid is actually much faster feeling but no one's mentioning how the standard is. The v6 turbo does have about 100 more torque than the old v8
Does that milage include the offroading you did ? I may have missed that part.
How big of a fuel tank an what does the computer give for Range! Very important when towing! Can you get a bigger optional fuel tank, for less stops to fill up while towing?
32 gallons, say roughly 20mpgs... that's 640. But I wouldn't bet past 500. Don't wanna burn out the fuel pump in long trips
Standard tank is 22 gallons smaller than last gen tundra, don't know what tank these trucks have but I'd guess it's the larger 32 gallon
@@ultraneight no good to me without a big tank! The only problem I got with my 2008! Small tank! Love my v-8 , mines just got 118,000 good to go for a few mores years!!!
@@johnburris5927 Same. Got a 2010 and there's so much room for a bigger tank. You can buy aftermarket 38 gallon and even 46 gallon, not worth the expense to me though.
@@ultraneight it depends on how long you’re going to keep it! I still think there sales will suffer without the V-8 !!
I expected faster, and Andre's face during the 0-60 kind of says it all
It really does.
I'm sure it is EPA terrorism.
Looks like he is drunk...lol
@@VE4NSA he looks very underwhelmed
7 seconds is fast
I might be looking into this truck bit more.
Can't wait for people to tune and open up the exhaust on this beast
its a small engine . not much to open .
@@morgancoldfirecoldfire8256 don't be a fool young buck. Look up 2jz supra and 3.5 raptor when you get a minute.
@@zakattack467 talking about sound the raptor sounds like a v6 . There is a reason why ford pumps fake exhaust note in the cab .
hopefully this new engine is like the supra with lots of potential but we dont know . the new supra is just a bmw.
hopefully like the 2jz
Put the 3.5 twin turbo in the Tacoma
No one’s gonna mention 93 octane… absurd. Everything should run 87
no one talking about the painted on valve guides and particulate filter ,like diesels
I have a 2020 SR5 TRD Off-road and I’ll be honest. I’m starting to drool over this new limited you’re driving.
My 2016 silverado gets 22 mpg 4x4 v8 what's the advantage of v6 tundra????
I was kinda expecting better performance and MPGs then that.
Also it's not broken in yet......
@SCMongooseT4R the optimum word there is "diesel"
@SCMongooseT4R diesel and gas are different in mpg by quite a bit.
@SCMongooseT4R also hybrids still do require breaking in. It wasn't until 3000 miles in that my dad's pruis gave 50 mpg as rated
Didn't the 5.7s do 0-60 in around 6.5s?
I used to get 22-23MPG with a 2008 4WD crewcab 5.7L. Set the cruise near the speed limit.
I have a 16 f150 130k miles get 22 all day on the highway 5 liter v 8 70 miles per hour
This Tundra will get 25 or more under the same conditions once broken in. 70 is kind of slow.
70mph must drive In the slow lane
I usa cruise at 90
@@user-tb7rn1il3q No way it will do that.
Bought my 07 limited tundra brand new and the back roads 65 mph I get 25 mpg easily and have seen 26. I average 80-85 mph on the interstate and if I’m going with the wind I’ll get 18-20 but if I go against the wind it drastically reduces. My buddy races his tundra from green light to red light all the time then complains about his gas millage. I baby every DD car I’ve ever own and it showed when I bought my tundra.
@@samuelsanchez-uj6ui At 70 mph buses, 18 wheelers, 90 year olds, driving school students, etc. are passing.
I drove my 2015 tundra 5.7L from northeast Iowa to Los Angeles around 1890 miles . I got 17miles per gallon.
Kinda wanted to see the gas price for the culture 😂🤙
Do you have to run premium fuel? I saw you hit the 93 button when filling up.
It’s a free country. Put whatever fuel you want. Do you always put what they say?
no it doesn't require premium only 87
@@induction7895 It's just a question. Just wondering what the manufacturer recommends. I don't understand why you feel the need to be rude about it.
@@jfox71 or say something stupid like "it's a free country" no shit Sherlock
No they not going to make that use only 93
would have liked to seen an all black interior
I wonder if these trucks have the same break-in process like the C8 Corvette and Supras where it has to hit 500 miles to get the full power
Where’s the mpg on the Trd pro?
Premium required or recommended?
neither
I believe they said it calls for Premium when towing.
@@Shakerhood69 that doesn't make any sense
The TFL guys said the Owners Manual calls for Premium when towing and if not mistaken l believe they said Ford does the same thing.
recommended for maximum power.
Are gas prices there really that cheap. Dang.
Yes it is hence why Texans don't want illegals or California's destroying our state..
@@bmf88 what the hell does that have to do with the gas prices there? What a stupid comment to me.
@@moultonlavagaming it has everything to do with it snowflake
Explain how gas in California is double or triple the amount it is here in Texas id like to hear about it..
@@bmf88 gas prices as you go west are higher cause we transport. Google is free to use and you can see California prices are $4.46 a gallon. Where I live it’s $3.67. Texas where a lot of the crude oil comes from it is $2.84 a gallon. None of that has anything to do with illegal emigrants. Parts of why gas is higher is crude oil is more expensive than a year ago. Also many truckers retired during pandemic and haven’t been replaced and so on.
Did you hold traction control button for 5 seconds?
My 19 Tundra also can get 19 mpg on highway (w/o towing)