Video není dostupné.
Omlouváme se.
4 Things we can learn from Finnish bodybuilders
Vložit
- čas přidán 6. 08. 2024
- New study: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36645...
1. Metabolic damage is a myth.
More info: mennohenselmans.com/metabolic...
2. It’s incredibly difficult to get below 5% (men) or 12% BF (women)
More info: • The scientific truth a...
3. It’s possible to build muscle in energy deficit.
More info: mennohenselmans.com/gain-musc...
4. Women respond just as well to dieting and training as men.
More info:
mennohenselmans.com/natural-m...
mennohenselmans.com/ffmi-calc...
Chapters:
00:00 Introduction
00:15 1. Metabolic damage is a myth
03:25 2. It’s incredibly difficult to get below 5% (men) or 12% BF (women)
04:12 3. It’s possible to build muscle in energy deficit.
05:50 4. Women respond just as well to dieting and training as men.
#mennohenselmans #bodybuilding #exercisescience #personaltrainer #personaltrainers #personaltraining #personaltrainerlife #personaltraineronline
So fun to see 5 finnish names and Captain America as the authors of the paper. Also your Malabar chestnut tree looks epic.
Another great video! Thank you Menno!
Thank you for sharing - very interesting.
Thank you.
Simply the best
Off topic, and meant in the best way possible, but I legit thought this video was going to be a vikingcore metal music video or viking AI art showcase until I read the title and saw it was from you.
That thumbnail slaps so hard.
I would emphasize that the metabolic findings were in bodybuilders that even in a cut are getting a good amount of protein and that have a higher percentage lean muscle to start with. Average person (not me or most of your viewers) with much less muscle mass to start with and following the typical lower protein weight-loss diet the results would probably be different.
Great video! The reality of the myth of metabolic damage is well done in this presentation.
Menno, thank you for another very interesting video. I am wondering if subjects were natural or if some special sports supplements were involved. If they were, it would significantly impact ability to build muscle while losing fat.
Yes, "Participants who were diagnosed with chronic diseases, reported using prescribed medications (excluding birth control pills), or any substances or methods prohibited by WADA, or those competing in the junior (below 19 years of age) or master (over 40 years of age) categories or in a non-drug tested competition were excluded from the study. The participants in the COMP groups were required to prepare for and compete in the Finnish Fitness Sports Association’s 2019 national championships during the investigation and be registered under the national doping control and testing organization under the World Antidoping Agency (WADA) to participate."
@@villeisola that's rather reassuring. Thank you for the information!
Are we able to get our calories back to normal (pre diet) from reverse dieting and maintain weight?? Or do we have to regain our weight (pre diet)? Thx
The word "relative" when comparing men and women is super important to remember, because it's a little bit like interpreting a high-beta regression, i.e. if female muscle up 1 unit, male muscle up β > 1 (or in actual terms, maybe 2 - don't quote me on that haha).
Shoutout to all my suomen poikas - perkele
What immune markers were tested?
Menno, are you saying that men and women can gain the same amount of total muscle (relative to their starting point) or they can gain muscle at the same RATE as each other?
Same rate. Different starting point generally, so the total absolute amount will be lower in women. But if a man and a woman both started with 60 kg FFM, they should be able to gain the same absolute amount of muscle.
How can that be possible with testosterone levels etc? Men and women can gain the same amount of muscle? @@menno.henselmans
I think they’re blasting so much more leading up to the competition? So that’s why the women gain muscle in the ladder part of their cut.
Thumbnail makes me want to hop on the juice.
Great content Menno!
What about maintenance? can I recompose at maintenance calories? lets say go from 20 to 12 bodyfat but changing that into muscle?
Would probably take years. Possibly years and years. Bulking and cutting is WAY faster.
Do the Finnish bodybuilders do more negative (eccentric) only exercises than the average American bodybuilder? Is this a likely result of the Pavel Komi study of 1970, which influenced the Nautilus Training Principles of Arthur Jones?
I misspelled the late Dr. Komi's first name, which is actually P-A-A-V-O. Sorry about that.
Now I want to Google Finnish women competitors. Just to se who are we talking about.
well if you are in an energy deficit, your body compares the deficit with fat storages. So you arent in an real deficit untill your body fat drops below certain points and your body decides to turn the Lever.
Is that thumnail AI generted versions of the same bodybuilder? What was the prompt... "Finninsh gigachad"?
That is traply good to know.
On point 3 aren't these competitors on PED's? Making their recomp easier
Beard boosts your gains by 223%?
*221%
In one video Layn Nortan's pinworm Paul Revelia proudly tells a story of a female client he coached to get out of metabolic damage FOR TWO YEARS !!!!!! TWO YEARS !!!!
Amennorhea may describe what happened to her better than metabolic damage.
Sisu!
Hm, but men actually lost muscle, no? Looking at only women to support the claim that one can build muscle in an energy deficit seems like cherry picking to me...
You only need one to show it's *possible*.
@@menno.henselmans Guess it depends on what "possible" means -- on that view a single data point (subject) showing muscle growth in a deficit would be sufficient. But usually we are interested in inferences to the population level, thus we use inferential stats, and then sub-group analyses can be pretty problematic, inflating Type-1 error.
@timostein4830
Perhaps men too could build muscles if they stayed at 12% bodyfat.
@@larsnystrom6698 Sure, possible! But just looking at the plot it appears, across both groups, no muscle was built.
Why do you always show off your chest hair all the time xD. Stop flexing on us
Going below 5% BF is not that hard, Ronnie was 0.3% so surely 3-4% is a walk in the park. People simply lack work ethics these days
Uhh... 😂
@@Cyb0rgd3ck3r xD
I'm .1% brain is atrophying
Wrong. Ronnie was at negative levels. That’s right. He had negative levels of body fat. Think about that. It means he burned for our sins.