Undertaker SHOOTS On Who Should've Ended The Streak!
Vložit
- čas přidán 8. 02. 2023
- Subscribe to the channel for more clips of our live shows and interviews, and don't forget to like and comment too!
Subscribe to our new clips channel / itrclips for Monday Night Live with Alex McCarthy, clips from our video podcasts on Twitch and smaller bitesize clips from live shows and interviews.
Check out ITRWrestling.com | For News, Interviews, Exclusives, Podcasts and Much More!
Buy our magazine at insidetheropesmagazine.com | Available Now, Ships Worldwide.
ITR Patreon is the best way to directly support us if you enjoy our content. We offer LOADS of bonus content, including the Pod Of Thunder, our dysfunctional journey back to WCW for the entire run of Thunder, The Power Slam OverRun, Retro Raw & Smackdown and ITR Patreon is the only place where you can hear our WWE & AEW PPV reviews!
Support Us On Patreon Today! itrwrestling.com/patreon
Follow us:
Facebook: itrwrestling.com/facebook
Twitter: itrwrestling.com/twitter
Instagram: itrwrestling.com/instagram
TikTok: / insidetheropes - Zábava
Roman would've caused WW3 if he beat the streak
no Roman was actually well liked in 2014 it's only after that Rumble win when people started hating him.
No it should’ve been Roman let them be mad
@@khalilkaouane3700 no he meant wm 33
@@Unexpectedthings007 Well he still had Nuclear heat after that even when the streak was already done so i can only imagine how fans would react if he broke the streak at Mania 33.
Haha
Listening this after Bray Wyatt's death hits different😢
😢
Would have been a hilariously bad choice.
Yes he's dead. But he fucking sucked.
What????? 😯
@@JustChillin740yeah he died
@@RealMikeMiller13 I didnt know that until I read this comment. I looked it up and was very true. Used to watch wwe till 2 years ago. So thats why I was in a shock. 😥
Having bray wyatt break the streak would’ve actually been rather fitting. Passing the torch to new face of fear
RIP
RIP to Bray Wyatt man 💔
@@sovereignsupreme8203weird
Brock would have made more sense had he (taker) had been more of his ABA persona….. Bray would have made sense as being the new face of Darkness ….Having Roman beat the streak depends on when….. definitely NOT during this Bloodline era…..
True
So much respect and love. Truly though the streak should of never been broke. It is a legendary achievement to have had the streak and the perfect record for the Deadman. I do respect the fact that it did end.
Even with the streak broken, we're still talking about it.
it had to be broken, undertaker needed to retire, and he never would have been able to as long as that winstreak was up.
They definitely should have broken the streak, because it was the biggest rub ever built up in the history of professional wrestling. It would have been an incredible waste, a waste of undertaker's entire career, to not use the breaking of the streak like that. It would have all been for nothing, if they didn't break the streak. It would have been saying that Undertaker's whole career never really meant anything, and that all the blood sweat and tears he put in over 3 decades wasn't important or meaningful.
Never in the entire history of professional wrestling worldwide, had been built up as big as Taker's streak. They HAD to use it, otherwise what would have been the point of it all?
Not using it would be like climbing up almost the entirety of mount everest, but then when you're just a couple of yards below the peak of the mountain, you decide to end your climb there and turn back, so that you never actually climb to the top of mount everest but just 99.99% of it. Why wouldn't you just climb up those extra few yards to get to the very top of the mountain? If you actually turned back then, then it would have meant all the incredibly strenuous effort you put in over the days and weeks of being there climbing would have been for nothing. No, nobody would ever climb up it but then turn around only a few yards from the peak.
And similarly, breaking undertaker's streak was the biggest deal in the history of wrestling. They'd put in decades of very hard work to build it up, and you're just gonna not use it right at the end when you could give someone the biggest rub the business has ever seen? Then what was the point of doing the streak in the first place!?
I don't think Brock was the best decision for who to end the streak, but I think it's worked out very well. Since he broke the streak he's remained as the final boss of WWE, the guy everyone has to beat to reach the top of the roster. WWE have been able to use Brock time and time and time again to lose to the next big thing in the company, the next top guy, and so despite Brock losing a fair amount, he still remains very credible as an undefeatable-seeming beast of a man. They've got a whole decade of use of Brock as the ultimate jobber ever. And it's because he broke the streak, and so he has permanent credibility forever more, despite how often he loses. So in that sense, WWE got an incredible amount of good, positive things, from having Brock break the streak. So even though I would have picked someone else to break the streak, personally, I think WWE have definitely made great use of Brock being the one, they've really got their money's worth from it, and so it's completely justified in that sense.
@@othmaaneWRyeah but not by Lesnar aaah! I love Lesnar don't get me wrong but.......
Although the streak was ended, my kids kids will always know The Deadman, The Undertaker, has The Best Wrestlemania streak known to history!!!
I can agree with Taker’s suggestions (Wyatt especially), but WWE really never should’ve ended it. If he had hung it up undefeated it would’ve been a perfect legacy for The Deadman.
Taker is old school, he always believed in leaving on your back. You go out putting the next generation over.
eric bishoff had to be part of it it was a WCW type of booking honestly
@@Kosten_2K I can respect him wanting to go out in that way, knowing how old school he was. What’s always bothered me is that Brock didn’t need the win, and seeing that Taker worked every Mania to follow (except 35, if my memory is correct,) there were still a few chances to honor that wish while making a new star. Instead Roman Reigns was put in an impossible position a few years later, and Bray Wyatt was sacrificed for a feud that was without its most compelling element from the jump thanks to the previous Mania.
@@gabepollock1641 ask Vince he was the main culprit for it. I also think Brock also did not want to end the streak as he is already a big star in the company and by ending the streak he will not gain anything from it. I believe in the past there were also some reports that Taker was suppose to be win but vince decide it in last minute to make Brock win it. I think if Vince is smart by using Roman to end the streak and turning him heel on raw next day, we will get one of the greatest heel earlier than the tribal chief era, but Vince with his ego still want Roman to be a face of the company by building him like super Cena at that time.
@@spritzerhijo Roman should’ve never ended the streak in less he was a heel going into the storyline of wrestlemania the way they did the wrestlemania match years after the streak was over was just terrible booking.
He is a legend with pure heart...
The Undertaker streak should have never been broken at all
It definitely shouldn’t have ended up with him losing twice. The second he lost to Brock he should’ve just retired. Them making him lose to Roman also was pathetic. And the John Cena match was embarrassing.
The WWE has to worry about building other stars up. When stone cold was big they had a problem of finding sombody to compete against him for awhile that the audience could enjoy. So they need to prop other fighters up and get as many as possible. The good ones are retiring and there will be nobody good left.
no it most definitely should've ended
@@UncleRuckus7600It also didn’t help that stone cold didn’t want to put over guys before he left.
@palantiri6590 stone cold built up the rock by loosing to him and the rock became the best ever.
Reigns needed that win.
Bray Wyatt deserved it .
FUCKING FACTS!!
bray would’ve been huge if they had him beat cena at wm 30 then break the streak at 31
It would’ve been better if Romain ended it
@@vato3328 Romain lettuce?
@@AidanHutchinson-wncp3po was that supposed to be funny cause is not
Passing that torch to Brey would've been the best idea
After that, wwe would have had to book him very serious. Winning alot of matches
@@realninjaent544 I don't see the problem with that.
@@realninjaent544 yep bray wouldve been top priority and main eventing multiple wresltmenaias by now had he been the one to end the streak
Bray failed
Rip
Bray ending the streak would have been the ultimate passing of the torch from persona to persona.
I get it, Taker has opinion but with all due respect that streak shuda never have ended. And Taker shuda hung it up undefeated
Literally every wrestler who's been taught the very foundation of wrestling thought that the Streak was always gonna end. That's not Taker's opinion alone.
@@christiankarlkarganilla2763 the fans don't think so, and this is a sport where fans' opinion matter more so than expert opinion
@@vincentsixx5054lmao no
If u look up the interview he had about it , he said he didn’t want to end it but Vince made him
Vince never appreciated what he had in Taker
He could've easily refused to end the streak and Vince couldnt have done anything about it. It would have been a legendary achievement, but he loved WWE more than personal accomplishments. Big props to this man.
Vince made him , he said it in an interview, he was literally trying the entire week to chance his mind
@@itshouse2766when was this? Because Taker had said the ending wasn't changed until the day of the event, 4 hours before it started to be exact, and he asked Vince, if he was sure, and Vince replied, "if not him, then who", and Taker agreed after that
That's the point, he wanted it to end. Undertaker had enough pull backstage that Vince would've went with any idea he wanted, and that's why it was broken
Roman would’ve made the better choice. If he broke the streak and immediately became the tribal chief. That would’ve made more sense of him being as dominant as he was during the tribal chief run.
That was actually the worst decision in WWE history
roman reigns beating him wouldn't have been better, Edge shoulld have
If tribal chief character is one to be broke the streak I will satisfied then big dog or brock
Blame Vince McMan For That Decision He Didn’t Want Brock To Leave The Company 🤔🤦🏾♂️🙅🏾♂️😠🤮🤟🏾🙌🏾💯
@@ffhhhbbfxfggggfdddffffffffEdge Has Said No Absolutely Not He Didn’t Need Too End It Because He Was Headlining Wrestlemania 😮🤷🏾♂️💯
@@ffhhhbbfxfggggfdddffffffff no, Kane should've. 100%.
R.I.P Bray Wyatt❤
No one should have ended it, the streak was legendary, definitely one of the worst decisions in wrestling history
They shouldn't have broken the streak at all, but no one will ever equal 21-0.
They definitely should have, because it was the biggest rub ever built up in the history of professional wrestling. It would have been an incredible waste, a waste of undertaker's entire career, to not use the breaking of the streak like that. It would have all been for nothing, if they didn't break the streak. It would have been saying that Undertaker's whole career never really meant anything, and that all the blood sweat and tears he put in over 3 decades wasn't important or meaningful.
Never in the entire history of professional wrestling worldwide, had been built up as big as Taker's streak. They HAD to use it, otherwise what would have been the point of it all?
Not using it would be like climbing up almost the entirety of mount everest, but then when you're just a couple of yards below the peak of the mountain, you decide to end your climb there and turn back, so that you never actually climb to the top of mount everest but just 99.99% of it. Why wouldn't you just climb up those extra few yards to get to the very top of the mountain? If you actually turned back then, then it would have meant all the incredibly strenuous effort you put in over the days and weeks of being there climbing would have been for nothing. No, nobody would ever climb up it but then turn around only a few yards from the peak.
And similarly, breaking undertaker's streak was the biggest deal in the history of wrestling. They'd put in decades of very hard work to build it up, and you're just gonna not use it right at the end when you could give someone the biggest rub the business has ever seen? Then what was the point of doing the streak in the first place!?
I don't think Brock was the best decision for who to end the streak, but I think it's worked out very well. Since he broke the streak he's remained as the final boss of WWE, the guy everyone has to beat to reach the top of the roster. WWE have been able to use Brock time and time and time again to lose to the next big thing in the company, the next top guy, and so despite Brock losing a fair amount, he still remains very credible as an undefeatable-seeming beast of a man. They've got a whole decade of use of Brock as the ultimate jobber ever. And it's because he broke the streak, and so he has permanent credibility forever more, despite how often he loses. So in that sense, WWE got an incredible amount of good, positive things, from having Brock break the streak. So even though I would have picked someone else to break the streak, personally, I think WWE have definitely made great use of Brock being the one, they've really got their money's worth from it, and so it's completely justified in that sense.
@@duffman18 Nah, the streak should have remained unbroken.
@@duffman18No.
@@duffman18Nice book
Well if they write it in someone will lol
RIP Bray
Should've given Taker the streak. He Should've gone undefeated.
Honestly. And hear me out. It should have been Kane.
When you think of the Brothers of Destruction you think of Taker and Kane.
I think if Kane broke the streak it would have been more satisfying due to their history, and also would have elevated kanes legacy that much more.
Better script imo is,
Someone who need the win (like Mark said like Wyatt or Reigns), THEN somehow got helped by Kane to win.
This way, the winner will receive hate yet a 'higher status'. From here the rest of the story can be anything. Like, give him a redemption arc or sum and eventually fight Kane perhaps?
Idk, although they have history as BOD I don't Kane is the right guy to ended it.
They killed Kane well before that
@NamelessMist kane needed some more development
Kane ending the streak in one of the 2 matches he had with Taker would not have been as big. The streak was still very young by the 2nd time they faced off at mania. The first match Taker was 6-0 going into it and the streak wasn’t even talked about at that point in time. the second match Taker was 11-0 going into it. So no it would not have been as big of a deal as when Brock ended the 21-0 streak. Kane was already finished and buried at that point of his career. Bray Wyatt was still young(Only 25)and being booked horribly. If he had beaten Taker in Brocks place, he would’ve became bigger then he was and won more championships and main evented more Wrestlemanias.
they fucking hate Kane, so annoying 1997 Kane wipes the entire roster today
RIP Windham Rotunda aka Bray Wyatt
Here after, Bray Wyatt's death. He really should've been the one😢
He's not wrong. Brock was a top guy who got a rub he didn't need so could what? Go to SummerSlam and destroy Cena? Which he could have believably done anyway without this extra feather in his cap. It's like putting over Superman on his way to defeating Lex Luthor for the 185th time.
It def helped enhance Brock’s momentum to summerslam against cena but he def didn’t need the win
Brock carried the company for the next 10 years after it happened. Your not buying ppvs or subscription to network without brock being on it. Name on other legit star
@@Maradalayeah but he was barely on tv. he was a part timer. other than a storyline perspective and a few ppvs. they really dropped the ball on the streak. I think a guy like Roman or even a Bron Breakker type of wrestler would’ve benefited them more. If they would’ve beaten the streak. Brock was already UFC legend and champion. he was already an established star. all this did was enhanced his character. which they could’ve enhance the “Beast” character. In a different way instead of wasting the streak.
@@VazmanianDeviI brock stayed with the company for the next 10 years! You claim all this part time shit, dude, if you watch boxing you get floyd Mayweather twice a year. Brock ruled wwe from the day he came back after wm 28. Yes he broke the streak. But who at that time did you want to beat it that you would pay money to see today??? Who is worth paying money to see today? Roman is like a joke champion that is just getting pushed to keep the company relevant. We know wwe is global, but there is, and hasn't been a legit global superstar to keep this company going since cena is the 2010s, or brock in the 2020s. Yes at the time I disagree with brock breaking the streak. But he stuck around for 10 years and used it. Finn, shinsuke, aj styles, definitely not kevin owns are getting money pouring in for ppv or wwe network. Let's just be honest with ourselves, brock made a decision to stay with the company and he was the biggest name the company could have and have made them more money then anyone other flipper they could offer. It's not cirus Olay, it's wrestling, gotta have a true badass.
Brock kept his word and I guarantee you ain't buying the next bs ppv unless a name like brock is on it.
@@Maradala this is professional wrestling not boxing. If you wanna make that weak point. we can use that same analogy with Roman. boxing or UFC champions are required to defend their belt twice a year. this is pro wrestling. Brock did stay with the company for the 10 years, but with all that time off and he went off to do another MMA fight in between that 10 years. that does not add up to 10 years of work in the company. Brock was already a huge star. breaking the streak did nothing to Brock. that is the point. they wasted the streak against a guy who was already an established main eventer. a guy who has accomplished more than anybody on the roster. the streak should have never ended. unless it was to elevate som1 to super stardom. which Brock already had.
after Taker’s streak was over he wrestled 5 more manias. there was no stakes at all, there was no suspense at all since the streak was over. pro wrestling is pre determined. you have 1 chance with this gimmick match to get som1 over that needs it the most. then you wasted it on a guy who was already established. also Brock’s run at that time was not that good. his run in 2003 to 2004 was way better. when he came back he seemed lazy as f. that’s what makes him beating the streak even worse. he didn’t take his craft as seriously as he did back 03 or 04. can’t cry over spilt milk, but acting like they didn’t drop the ball with Taker’s streak. you’re being pretty delusional at this point. Idc how long he’s been in the company. what they did was not a smart business decision. this is about making new megastars for the future.
Of the two it should have been Bray. The narrative at the time was that Bray was the ‘new’ Undertaker and it would have cemented it. Roman was already destined for his top spot. Bray made it part of his character that he was overlooked, it’s what his second match at mania with Cena was about. Had he been the guy to break the streak it would have shot him to the moon instead of being misused for so long.
RIP bray wyatt
Undertaker retiring with the streak in tact, would've been the greatest WWE & Wrestlemania feat of all time
Undertaker is such a professional man much respect 🫡
Bray Wyatt should have been the one, he has the best character work out of anyone who has ever been in the WWE, if they gave that man free leash, we would have a new unbeatable fenom.
So humble person you are sir
Under taker still undefeated in my eyes lol
The first mistake wwe made is breaking taker streak
Not breaking the streak would have been the stupidest most retarded decision in the history of professional wrestling. Only an idiot or a idiot child would think they shouldn't have broken it. They definitely should have broken the streak, because it was the biggest rub ever built up in the history of professional wrestling. It would have been an incredible waste, a waste of undertaker's entire career, to not use the breaking of the streak like that. It would have all been for nothing, if they didn't break the streak. It would have been saying that Undertaker's whole career never really meant anything, and that all the blood sweat and tears he put in over 3 decades wasn't important or meaningful.
Never in the entire history of professional wrestling worldwide, had something like this been built up as big as Taker's streak was. They HAD to use it, otherwise what would have been the point of it all?
Not using it would be like climbing up almost the entirety of mount everest, but then when you're just a couple of yards below the peak of the mountain, you decide to end your climb there and turn back, so that you never actually climb to the top of mount everest but just 99.99% of it. Why wouldn't you just climb up those extra few yards to get to the very top of the mountain? If you actually turned back then, then it would have meant all the incredibly strenuous effort you put in over the days and weeks of being there climbing would have been for nothing. No, nobody would ever climb up it but then turn around only a few yards from the peak.
And similarly, breaking undertaker's streak was the biggest deal in the history of wrestling. They'd put in decades of very hard work to build it up, and you're just gonna not use it right at the end when you could give someone the biggest rub the business has ever seen? Then what was the point of doing the streak in the first place!?
I don't think Brock was the best decision for who to end the streak, but I think it's worked out very well. Since he broke the streak he's remained as the final boss of WWE, the guy everyone has to beat to reach the top of the roster. WWE have been able to use Brock time and time and time again to lose to the next big thing in the company, the next top guy, and so despite Brock losing a fair amount, he still remains very credible as an undefeatable-seeming beast of a man. They've got a whole decade of use of Brock as the ultimate jobber ever. And it's because he broke the streak, and so he has permanent credibility forever more, despite how often he loses. So in that sense, WWE got an incredible amount of good, positive things, from having Brock break the streak. So even though I would have picked someone else to break the streak, personally, I think WWE have definitely made great use of Brock being the one, they've really got their money's worth from it, and so it's completely justified in that sense.
@@duffman18not to mention, Undertaker himself was all for it being broken
@@duffman18Lol do you work for them. Or are you Mr. Mcman.
It would have been perfect for storyline purposes if Taker faced Bray Wyatt and beat him, like he did, but Bray later returned as The Fiend and The Fiend ended the streak.
100%
True
Rest in peace bray wyatt
Nobody should of to be fair I think Taker is being modest here, deep down that should of been kept safe and unbroken
If the shield broke up and the streak was still going … roman beating the streak then turning heel the following night … might’ve been the ideal way for the streak to end (personally don’t think it should’ve ended tho)
Roman back then would been crucified moreso than he had been at that time, and they still wouldnt make him a heel. They'd still try and force the fans to cheer him. Roman now? 100%. He's a badass, he's over as the biggest heel in the company, and the story of him being undefeated vs the streak is an obvious one. But back then it wouldn't do anything for him except add to his go away heat.
Exactly what I was thinking. That boring, awkward, suffering succotash "babyface" Roman beating the streak would have been 100x worse than Brock beating it but this evil Roman who actually puts on a good show, yeah, that's a little more acceptable.
I said the same thing bro .. RIP bray
I heard he wanted Randy to do it back in the Legend Killer days.
That would have been insane
The streak wouldn't be as significant if it ended in 2005...
Furthermore, the WM25 match with HBK wouldn't have happened.
Maybe Taker still would've wrestled Shawn, but if you remove the streak from the context, that match wouldn't be held in high regards as it currently is
I’d still think Kurt Angle should have ended the streak back in 2006
This would have been the case if it weren’t for Eddie Guerrero’s tragic passing
I strongly disagree🤔
By the year of 2006, Kurt had accomplished everything you could possibly think of in the company.
With the exception of winning a royal rumble or the newly introduced MITB ladder match.
It wouldn't have really 'elevated' his career because he was already at his all time peak in 2006
One of the worst mistakes Vince has ever made. Interesting he mentions Bray, there is a lot of respect for Bray as we saw at RAW
I respect this
I can agree with Taker’s suggestions (Wyatt especially), but WWE really never should’ve ended it. If he had hung it up undefeated it would’ve been a perfect legacy close.
Taker is a great guy that he will always try to do the best for the brand but honestly it either should never have been broken or only one loss to a certified legend like Cena, Edge etc.
Given the scenario of WrestleMania 30 , when WWE universe was rallying behind Daniel bryan and the yes movement , and the only thing matter was Daniel completing his triumphant story that night , the twist of ending the streak was a moment no one saw coming . And the decision was the right one .
I wish I meet you ❤️ undertaker
They should've let Undertaker pick the guy who beat the streak.
The streak should’ve never ended.
Bray wyatt is the wise decision and best for make dark character hype 😢🔥
If Taker didn't lose to Shawn or Triple H, then he shouldn't have lost it to anyone besides like a Bray Wyatt as a passing of the torch retirement match.
Coming back to watch this hits different now that Bray is no longer with us.
Brock too talented is what hes trying to say
With the legend of the undertaker, the streak should’ve never been broken. With someone so dedicated to the company with the story line of a legend why ruin something that would hallmark history in the industry.
"Bray Wyatt, he's going to go to that next level"
*Vince McMahon music hits*
Definitely bray RIP😭
Rest in power Bray wyatt/the fiend/windham we will never forget you heavens gate LET HiM iN
I lover Underwear as much as the next guy.
But Ramon Noodles beating him during WeenieHut Juniors woulda made it impossible for anyone to take him seriously and not see everything as a massive push.
Edit: what I'm saying is I disagree with Undy's opinion here.
I'd say kane deserved it the most .
I'll say it EVERYTIME , it should've been Kane, and it should've been Taker's last wm...... A perfect ending to the storyline.
It didn't need to be broken. Nobody has become bigger than the streak amongst wrestling fans.
Roman 2020(beginning of bloodline) should have do that
I think Kane tbh
But Kane is his storyline brother though, it couldn't be Kane.
I ❤the undertaker and Kane In ring work
He didn't need it but he was the only one with the pedigree and physical prowess to believably beat him
The streak never should've ended. And it baffles me how people used to say it should've been Cena to end it. What sense would that have made? Lesnar and Taker had multiple feuds over the years. Kane, Triple H, and Shawn Michaels had several feuds with Taker over the years. Even Vince and Shane McMahon had several feuds with Taker. How many feuds did Cena and Taker have? Fucking 1, way back in 2003.
*Update* R.I.P to Bray. Brock definitely didn't need it. Personally I still think it should have been Kane even though he didn't need it either. At that time, it should have been Bray, no offense to Roman but, he didn't deserve it then.
Tbh out of all the ppl that the undertakers put over there's only been 5 or 6 ppl who hes lost to that ive actually been convinced by. Triple H, Batista , Kane, Big show, Brock lesnar and kurt angle. And so there's no one else who i woulda thought could break it and not recieve more hate than praise.
It would of gave Roman that Hulk Hogan Andre the Giant moment. But the truth is Reigns never had it. And that's why he still is not in a class of Stone Colds or John Cenas. He never got it
Mark was a true professional
Everyone would’ve hated Roman even more than they already did. Bad idea. Might as well be the ncaa, ufc and wwe champion to do it.
it needed to be a Heel cause the heat was always gonna be crazy
I wouldn't have minded if it was CM Punk.
U the g.o.a.t man
If Roman beat Taker then his years long title reign lol would have actually made more sense.
In my opinion it should have been Shawn Michaels in one of those matches they had at wrestlemania in 09’-10’
The streak ending is what broke my watching wrestling streak :v
brock wasnt the person to shoulda done it but it was the most unexpected moment too which i dont mind its hard to plan who to break taker streak, regardless who broke that it would be the same conversation forever
Judging by wat undertaker has accomplished all these years, i think that win needed someone of brock's nature "The bigger they are ther harder they fall"
Bray hits different now…but also imagining if Roman started the tribal chief character after beating the streak the amount of legit heat would’ve been nuclear
and let's be honest Bray Wyatt needed it cause now he's back and his character is dead just a bunch of talking
Hornswaggle could've used that rub.
Bray Wyatt 💔 deserves the most
What was Vine thinking? Lesner didn't need that push he was already up there
He talking about Wyatt is so...😢
Its should never end in first place
Yeah Bray Wyatt would be the best, “receiving” the darkness at WM, you know, he controls the bell and pitch black at the biggest stage would be dope.
I think WWE officials were worried about Brock Lesnar losing his unstoppable credibility if he lost a second consecutive time at Wrestlemania since his return.
If Brock had defeated Triple H at Wrestlemania 29 maybe they would have been more willing to let him lose the next year and give the streak to another young talent.
However Triple H would also have earned three consecutive losses at Wrestlemania.
I'd rather Brock break it than the Roman we had back then. Ofc I'd rather have had neither of them break it and it be someone who A) was loved & B) needed that lil extra push. People kinda in the Rusev or Cesaro position (no, I'm not saying them, just people around that area 🤷🏼♂️)
Rip Bray Wyatt
Your 100% right undertaker
I still think Bray should have won their Wrestlemania match during his "New Face of Fear" gimmick. I get that meant the Undertaker would have to drop 2 Mania matches in a row but come on....its the Undertaker, hed recover. A Bray win would have definitely elevated him much sooner
I think that's right but at least it's believable with Brock. Perhaps Brock was more popular than those other guys. Maybe that had something to do with it. Perhaps WWE wanted to test the water before having someone do it who was not fully established yet or someone that wasn't totally over. Once the streak is broken, it's easier to have Undertaker put others over without too much backlash. Brock was a guy who had beaten The Undertaker before so it's easier for WWE to get away with breaking the streak that way. Would it have gone down worse if someone less popular had been the one to do it? Possibly. I think for a current roster member to do it, they have to be massively over. Another wrestler who has a bit of legend status themselves but isn't over the hill, as well as being convincing as a tough guy and also legit tough does actually make sense. Brock is a monster. You'd believe that he could do it. Anyone who defeats Taker after, that perhaps the fans aren't fully behind is not going to face as much backlash if the streak is already broken. Once WWE has chosen their guy, they need to push them but sometimes it isn't always who the fans want it to be. It often is. Historically, it often went the way of the fans but not always and less so in more recent times. It's much better when the person is massively over. That did become more of a rarity over time but it's always been about going in a direction that suits the character. Being a heel suits Roman Reigns, being a face didn't. Some suit both the face and heel persona. Some only suit one and sometimes it's about what type of face or heel. It's timing also. Sometimes a wrestler will have to start as one in order to be the other. Case and point, The Rock and Austin had to be heels before they became faces that the fans would get behind. If they're going to be faces, they have to be badass, anti-hero types in order for the transition to work. Being edgy and badass is what made guys like Rock and Austin popular. Whether they are face or heel, those character traits have to be there. Reigns could probably get over as a face now because he could bring elements of his current character into it. He has more depth as a character now. He would still have to be very mean in order for a face turn to work. He can't be a John Cena. He has to be aggressive and ruthless, a face with attitude. The only major changes would need to be no more cheating, no more help and plenty of heated feuds with heels.
whatever
but you are a legend.
The amount he was booed Raw after WM33 when he did beat Taker, would have been nothing compared to if he actually broke the Streak. Not to mention after Royal Rumble 2015 and after WM32. I'll acknowledge him when he leaves
I feel like 2015-2017 was lets boo and hate Roman Reigns as much as we can era in WWE
Imagine thinking a former multiple time WWE champion and UFC HW champion who had already had a main event run in the company BOTH TIMES he was in WWE needed to beat the Undertaker at WM
EAT..SLEEP..CONQUER....THE STREAK 😎🌪
Orton he's lasted a long time he was a butthead back in the day but he's matured along the way and become a great superstar one of the best I give him respect for.that
Definitely Brayy,, he literally is the modern embodiment of UT taker was never a wordy guy but brayy is and he vocabulary and ability to articulate his word in a dark symbolic metaphoric phrasing is amazing. Not only that but BW is the freaking beat in the ring. And he can bring that dark edge. I’d definitely would have started calling him the New Keeper Of The Yard!!!
Dam. Rest in peace bray Wyatt. I stopped watching wwe a long time ago maybe like 2020 cause shit was just getting wack but bray went hardd
BRAY WAS THE ONE AS THE NEW FACE OF FEAR 😭
I think bray would’ve been a good pick. Kinda like a pass the torch type deal. Undertakers old. We know that much. So to pass the mystery figure legacy. To bray. Sensational
Imo bray, he was set to become the next "undertaker" and had he beaten the streak that would've cemented it.
Would love if it was actually Bray Wyatt. The next one to maintain the fear factor in WWE, he needed it
If they did things right, they should've made Sting break the streak or at least set up a dream match against him and Taker. Us millennials from the 90's got robbed of seeing that match come into fruition.
I’m with you. But also in opinion, Not that it really matters anymore because the streak is past been broken. But still just to say in my opinion, I think it should’ve been eather Sting or Goldberg. Maybe Sting at Wrestlemania 31 or Goldberg at Wrestemania 35.