Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs)

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 28. 10. 2014
  • A randomized controlled trial (RCT) is an experimental form of impact evaluation in which the population receiving the programme or policy intervention is chosen at random from the eligible population, and a control group is also chosen at random from the same eligible population. It tests the extent to which specific, planned impacts are being achieved. The distinguishing feature of an RCT is the random assignment of units (e.g. people, schools, villages, etc.) to the intervention or control groups. One of its strengths is that it provides a very powerful response to questions of causality, helping evaluators and programme implementers to know that what is being achieved is as a result of the intervention and not anything else.
    This video summarizes the key features of an RCT. For details, please read Brief 7 at www.unicef-irc.org/KM/IE/

Komentáře • 35

  • @lynxb8300
    @lynxb8300 Před 4 lety +6

    great presentation of RCT really good explanation with its advantage and disadvantage

  • @308kep
    @308kep Před 8 lety +12

    Excellent explanation!!!

  • @Djorouh
    @Djorouh Před 8 lety +5

    Applying this technique to my Ph.D. Thanks for the clarifications.

  • @koorzeny
    @koorzeny Před 6 lety +2

    Thank you! Much appreciated.

  • @pramitlahiri1978
    @pramitlahiri1978 Před 2 lety

    Beautiful explanation. Thank you.

  • @TheOriginalMarimoChan
    @TheOriginalMarimoChan Před 4 lety

    Excellent, thank you, it was very helpful!

  • @MindfulEvolution314
    @MindfulEvolution314 Před 6 lety +1

    Great work!!!

  • @syedabbas749
    @syedabbas749 Před 4 lety

    Awesome Explanation :) :)

  • @chinonsobarry-nwosu8781

    Great video . Thank you

  • @dr.vishwakanthk5444
    @dr.vishwakanthk5444 Před 8 lety +3

    excellent overview...thanks!

  • @sheheryarshahid9193
    @sheheryarshahid9193 Před 3 lety

    Clear my concept about RCT.

  • @AkbarMaxx
    @AkbarMaxx Před rokem

    Excellent explanation

  • @dr.healthcare3065
    @dr.healthcare3065 Před 7 lety

    excellent explanation

  • @lukedebenham208
    @lukedebenham208 Před rokem

    fantastic vid

  • @vksingh8635
    @vksingh8635 Před 4 lety

    Good explanation dear thank you

  • @amelmhmd9946
    @amelmhmd9946 Před 9 měsíci

    Thank you

  • @superhero2316
    @superhero2316 Před 4 lety

    A/B test ,is it ?

  • @user-es5dp9oz7t
    @user-es5dp9oz7t Před 3 měsíci

    How to determine sample size in RCT?

  • @emmycharles5735
    @emmycharles5735 Před 6 lety

    thank u for help me

  • @gaurav7047
    @gaurav7047 Před 4 lety

    Sahi!

  • @bestpranks350
    @bestpranks350 Před 8 lety

    شكرا_متعب

  • @podpathpro
    @podpathpro Před 9 lety

    FUCK YEAH PAUL TREMBLAY WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

  • @nishantsen6820
    @nishantsen6820 Před 2 lety

    Intervention and control meaning?

    • @mutelarsorhougbe4606
      @mutelarsorhougbe4606 Před 2 lety +1

      Intervention means that the person controlling the experiment has given them a treatment rather than left them alone- so they have INTERVENED. Control means that nothing has been given to them/ changes about them- they have been left alone so they can be used to compare how effective that treatment (intervention) is.

    • @nishantsen6820
      @nishantsen6820 Před 2 lety +2

      @@mutelarsorhougbe4606 ohh I understood thank you for answering 😊✌️👍

  • @Pranav-rp8wi
    @Pranav-rp8wi Před 4 lety +6

    who's here after esther duflo & abhijeet banerjee got nobel for this

  • @TheHeadlesss
    @TheHeadlesss Před 2 lety

    بيبي

  • @wonder7798
    @wonder7798 Před 2 lety

    Sounds Ike this was done in vaccinations

  • @cheranjeevijayam8163
    @cheranjeevijayam8163 Před rokem

    All good. But Pakistan Occupied Kashmir is shown as part of Pakistan.

    • @Indiran2025
      @Indiran2025 Před 10 měsíci

      BecUse this isndone by Americans or Pakistanis

  • @uriarina432
    @uriarina432 Před rokem

    is this even ethical? why not share the sources that may(or may not) contribute to the development of young children with as much children as you can, as long as they are not found to be harmful within the limitations of scientific knowledge.