Jordan Peterson Calmly DISMANTLES Feminism in front of two Feminists!
Vložit
- čas přidán 27. 08. 2024
- 🏆 My Website: mtarmy.com
🗣️ Consultations: www.calendly.c...
❗ My Patreon: / mtandr
🎮2nd Channel: / @realmtrtv
💰Cashapp: $MTandR → Thank you for your support!
📸IG: / therealmtr
📢Email: mediocretutorialsandreviews@gmail.com
#MTR #MTaRmy
Outro: kurokibeats@gmail.com // linktr.ee/kuro...
*What I use to record my videos*:
📹
Camera - 77D: amzn.to/2SMuOHr
Lens - Sigma Art 35mm: amzn.to/2RLuh65
💻
Computer - (my exact version looks discontinued but here is a better version for less money): amzn.to/2RH9JMe
Second Monitor: amzn.to/39xdQTn
💡
Lighting - El Gato Key Light: amzn.to/3eivMmy
🎤
Microphone - Shure SM7B: amzn.to/3eYOfpW
🔌
Accessories
Macro Keyboard - El Gato Stream Deck: amzn.to/2QhogyS
Fan: amzn.to/2RP1U7i - Zábava
When you’re calm cool and collect and express your thoughts clearly, it drives a feminist crazier 😂
I believe its with women in general who are trying to out debate you or to get you as emotional as them. A stoic man cant be swayed or manipulated and they hate that.
Yeah, they get so jealous of us when we sit in an energy they can't.
@@soulspeedforeverBig Facts! 💯
Your not a man if you can't keep your composure and he kept it 💯
Lol facts
Doctor Jordan Peterson is one of the most important voices on cultural issues.
The most
He's a beta male and a fraud.
Wish he and KS did a broadcast.
Agreed
@sw00t_yprd79 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣JC is the problem, not the answer.
He has so much patience. Outnumbered and interrupted, he still manages to put his point across effectively.
It's hard to win an argument against a smart person, but impossible to win an argument against an idiot! 😂😉
you've been wanting to say that for some time, huh?
Lol, so true 😅.
@@MastiffEggroll very
When women start interrupting you, they’re scared of what you have to say. Tends to happen when a man is cutting through the deflections and double standards
Same thing happens whenever a guest on Fox News starts talking on points that show how bad Republicans are at governing.
Not wrong
Nearly every single time without exception.
women ☕
@@mylesg7278women☕️
It’s good to see Jordan Peterson back serving these delusional women.
This is an old vid.
@@chalp1290 Your mom is an old vid.
@@chalp1290doesnt change what the OP said.
I mean yea it’s old but it’s good to see this content making its rounds, got to remember that this shit gets censored all the time so it’s good to catch the homies up.
Jordan would get a more rational discussion with a bunch of monkeys.
Great example of inviting a prominent guest and not listening to what they have to say👍🤣😂
You do really expect 2 woman to listen to a man?
Ya they just want rating and to try to make fun of him and warp his point and twist it. They aren't even really listening to him.
@@marcovchb You are no better than those women saying that. Jordan is amazing and these feminists are manipulative "only my agenda matters" women. I am a women who would rather listen to him all month and not listen to them for more than a minute. Listening to those ladies are more like watching a soap opera.
I don't usually dig reaction videos with commentary for a video already with lots of debate and commentary but I did appreciate your inputs bro, good stuff.
I'd have to agree with your opinion on his input because the way he's speaking he's coming off very condescending to anyone viewing the video what have the inability to comprehend their discussion. Could have waited till the end
@@steventereshko4614 I appreciated it. He is very well spoken.
This isn’t an interview. There was a clear motive to dismantle this man and discredit him.
There is no chance of dismantling Mr J Peterson
Yes, & they failed, comprehensively ! !.
They were scared of him and did not want to hear his comments.
Scared of truth, that Jordan B Perterson is actually right and more feminist then them.
Exactly
"Is a trans woman a real woman?" Is a robot a real person? Thats the dumbest question ever.
Well you apparently need to add trans in front to refer to them
So obviously not good enough to be a real woman
😂 excellent
YOu’d have to reinvent a new word to define a person born with female genitalia. Perhaps like Prince the-gender previously known as women” FFS😂
He should've told her to try rephrase that question so it makes sense.
Like, "Did you mean, do i think men who dress like women, are biological women?" lol
if so, should be called just “woman” not “trans woman”
I don’t know how he gets through a whole conversation without calling these people an absolute moron.
Dr. Jordan Peterson is amazing. I dont agree with all his views but I support EVERYTHING I have seen of him. And as a woman a person with xx chromosomes I completely agree with his defense of men and a patriarchal society. I appreciate you standing your ground Dr. Ptereson!!!!!
Jordan is impressive. I wouldn't be able to deal with those ladies. Long ago everyone knew what a woman or man was, factually. Nowadays, facts are under attack.
It's a western problem. Everywhere on this earth know exactly what a woman is .
It's absolutely maddening, this nonsensical bs is why I left the left and became a social conservative!
@bighomiestevethemetalhead8131 I mean, how are people remaining in their leftist ideology after they hit the age od reason at like 6 years old is amazing to me.
Well said everyone says facts but it’s near death
~ Ladies? Being feminists, they would call you every name in the book, cursing you for labeling them with a patriarchal title reflecting the "fairer", weaker gender.
The term for both, instead?
Bitches.
I respect the level of patience this man has.
She asked "...a real woman", impliciitly she is admitting that there are fake women. One is either a woman or not, just like one is either dead or not.
For the record : dogs are known for what women are not known for : LOYALTY.
❤❤😊
Nice! I like how you let the interview flow and subtlety added to it :)
You know the sad thing is he speaks so logically and rationally. Anyone he speaks opposite from usually ends up looking silly when they TRY and counter or just change the subject. They're constantly cutting him off, making up answers for him and trying to move on to the next subject. Anyone with quarter of a brain can see the rudeness, narrative, and agenda of these feminists. Sad how obvious they are.
The problem is most feminists dont have a quarter of a brain, so theyll think peterson got dunked on
Seriously
Indeed, they do not make women look very good here.
@@davidgreen6490Feminism as a whole doesn’t make women look good lately. It’s sad that they took something meant to bring fairness and turned it into something unfair for men (and women who don’t fall into their beliefs). There’s no logic or principles left. It’s fueled by emotion and self righteousness now.
Well said Adrian!👍
I love how polite yet resolute he is with his answers. The gentleness of his voice makes the power of his arguments even more pronounced
Absolutely
Facts 👏🏽.
Well said.
Beautifully done I’m using this now Equality of Opportunity is different then Equality of Outcome 👏🏾
Equal opportunity doesn't mean Equality of outcome. As a practicality it's impossible. Can't be done without a dictatorship of some sort.
Appreciate this video and you breaking down some of the debate/conversation
It's amazing how in almost every interview, Mr Peterson is never allowed to answer. Their goal is to argue and confront.
You let him speak, he will win, so just don't.
Don't you love it when someone asks you a question then doesn't let you answer?
That's because usually it's a statement in the form of a question, like "why are you such an asshole" or the whole "when did you stop beating your wife". They make an insinuation and they don't really give a shit what the real answer or truth is.
lol
Mildly infuriating, lol
Or they ask u a question, you start answering. Then they chip in and answer for you cos they're afraid cute going to trump their arguments.
Loved this video! Please keep up exposing TRUTH!!!
MTR you gave an EXCELLENT definition of what DEI actually is. I applaud you for breaking it down for us people in the back. It’s not outcome period!!!
The fact that we are wasting so much valuable time on this planet discussing what is a woman, men are toxic, not complying because it's hurting ppl's feelings, etc... this was hard to listen to them, TRYING to gang up on him to get him to change is narrative.
It really pushes your patience. I live by the axiom never argue with an ignorant person they have had many more years of experience being ignorant
I tell lots of people that annoy me go talk to the wall. I'm not listening to whining for a justified opinion from Neverland. Figure it out I'm not the one.
I saw on the news yesterday that Just Stop Oil climate protesters in London were literally crying because they were not allowed to 'protest in the traffic' that it was, 'oppressive to force me to only protest on the pavement'. One woman's comment was very telling. She said, 'we know what a protest looks like, and it doesn't look like this.' Meaning, 'if I'm not allowed to stop traffic and possibly kill people on their way to hospital, etc., then it's not a "real" protest'. Of course, at the same time, these people didn't really know why they were there. The guy that guides them like sheep at the front of the protest asked, 'why are we here?' and they didn't have an answer. One woman answered, 'why are we here?' Finally, somebody said, 'injustice'. Then they all kept chanting, 'injustice'. Literal mindless sheep that cannot be guided through a doorway without an overlord and a cute diagram.
Later, they went through a little ritual in a hyper-religious manner, even using the same religious moral language. They kept repeating 'shame' over and over again (meaning, 'shame on the government for not following our demands'). Their defence, too, of the entire thing is very simple: 'the UK government is breaking UN laws; therefore, we are justified in breaking UK law in order to follow the UN laws'. If you're from America, this will likely seem very strange to you, but we are literally controlled by the UN and, to lesser degrees, the EU (even though we just formally left the EU).
YEEEEEEEEEESSSS...IVE BEEN AND STILL AM SAYING THAT ...WE SHOULDN'T BE ENTERTAINING THESE SICKOS...
✝️🙏⚔️♠️
JP: consistent, calculated value points
Feminist: my dress is pink lol :)))
Dr. Petersen is a force to be reckoned with. Only the people who can't use logic and are ruled by emotions have a real problem with this man.
Yup 👏🏽.
These women went in wanting to argue and not wanting to see any other points. Because they are right. The problem is, that is not an Intellectual.
Well done man. Very good explanation and better than I could have done. Very well done. I appreciate that.
It's hilariously ironic how she starts off introducing JBP and asks if people misrepresent his stances. Then immediately after she starts misrepresenting his stances while claiming she knows his stances.
Good point. Well said.
Look at how intent he is with listening to them. He turns to them every time it's their turn to discuss something. He's not there with a preconceived rebuttal but he's actively listening. They were concerned with trying to win through manipulation tactics and quick-witted responses.
I love how jordan stared staight at her eyes while he listents to her, paying full attention but when he speaks he stares at the room because he is talking to everyone, sharing knowledge and not just trying to prove these two women wrong
“Why not equality of outcome?” Ok let me ask her this: why isn’t everyone who wanted to be in the NFL actually in the NFL? How about rappers? Why aren’t they all equally popular? Why am I not as famous and rich as Drake when we both make music? You can just nudge their logic a little and the whole thought process is broken at that point
Exactly and even highly talented people never make it. Are they crying for them? Different things carry different values. It's as simple as that as to why outcomes can't be equal. You gonna pay a McDonald's employee what a doctor makes? Lol
You can never have equality of outcome... unless you forced it. When left alone... people will go their own way.. and the differences between men and women will increase
The primary problem with equality of outcome is that it can most easily be obtained by pulling down and suppressing the standards from the top rather than uplifting and improving the lives of those at the bottom. Think about it, it's easier to make everyone poor and miserable versus everyone happy and wealthy.
Because it’s impossible to elevate everyone. Some people just don’t want to work as hard or are not interested in being wealthy.
@@lordhelwintr283 its totally possible to show a good exemple and those who want to follow will do
There'll always be the top doctor, the good and the average one. And the "equal outcome" may exist between them or not, depending, for example, where they work. And there will always be the one who tries to be a doctor and gives up because he didn't get to the minimum mandatory standards, but at least he had the chance to try, and we have to grant that chance to everybody. Why complicate what is simple?
Agree that it is an important problem that equality of outcome necessitates destroying the most productive members in a group to match the lesser productive members of the group.
However the primary problem with equality of outcome (to use your words) is that it is impossible. Equality is an ideal, just like perfection, or purity, these ideals only exist in the human mind and are rarely (or never) reflected in the actual world.
Dr. Peterson elucidated this idea in this interview where he says tha6 equality of outcome is only achievable with extreme pressure and totalitarian measures. This is because it is impossible to achieve, which is largely a source of the suffering and genocides which occurred during the various communist regimes.
The impossible nature of the premise is the primary problem with the idea of equality of outcome.
I love your explanation when you paused the interview and subbed.
Respect, young man! You are brilliant!
I've seen this interview before, what I love about this reaction clip is how you don't over narrate and your expressions speak volumes, which is why I just immediately subscribed....
Exactly what I felt . Hate when people just interrupt every second
Dejavu about an interview with him and an interviewer that has that kind of questioning and stance. Good thing he keeps on putting himself in these talks, he is so well experienced by now, it is a joy to see him stand so tall and don't give in and keeps his composure. Mad respect for him.
Huge JP follower. Thanks for the share and your spot on take on it.
Jordan, you are by far my most respected person in that delusional world that we are growing in now. I wish that there was more people like you
I'm no male feminist, I just won't do labels.
I liked the part where she said she was a defender of equality of opportunity, and not equal outcomes. And then a minute later onward, defended equal outcomes / equity.
I know, right? She didn't even hear herself do it.
As a brit, I'm embarrassed by this woman she really needs to be quiet & let him finish what he's saying
I like your commentary bro!! For real. Thanks for being real with it
"Our next guest, maybe you recognize or maybe you don't." Brilliant. Stunning insight.
MTR you need to interview Jordan Peterson, this guy, is so on point. There is so much we can learn from him. Just like the Godfather Kevin Samuel. Great video as always.
She avoids giving a definition in order to keep her job 😅😂
This man has never been caught off guard...Stays on point and never lets irrational emotions take over. He is a true intellect and inspiration for common sense and logic.
Dr. Peterson is a monument standing tall among men. Much respect !
JP is almost always calm and collected aside from the rare time he goes off the handle. And he's allowed to be passionate when he sees something truly evil. He doesn't like the trans agenda. Me neither. I can't blame him. The Ellen page stuff was nonsense and likely personal as she is also Canadian.
I don't like when someone takes videos from others, put his face on the screen and comment like it was his work he was brigning but your interventions were very accurate and very articulate. Congratulations ! You're one of the few to bring something to the debate.
Most men are for equality, we would love to have the same rights as women enjoy.
I'll take a year paternity
Let get this straight: it’s completely logical to ask if trans women are real women but it’s illogical to ask biological women “what is a woman”?
🤡 world indeed
Well of course it is to these fools
One of the many reasons why I left the left and became a social conservative!
She says about Trump “…him potentially stopping other women having agency over their reproductive rights and lots of
men taking those decisions…” but I’ve never heard Trump advocate men raping women so what is she talking about?
There’s too many women supporting this BS but then when it affects them they’ll have a problem
If you have to differentiate trans women by referring to them with the prefix that they are trans
Then you’ve answered your own question, because they are not equal enough to drop the prefix
He's right, and I'm glad he was so calm and articulate about it..
Trump has repeatedly said that he will not oppose a woman's right to an abortion. He said that it should be left up to the states. Feminist do not agree with this idea which has been made law by the supreme court.
I am a woman and I love Dr Peterson. I find many of my views are similar to his. I can tell what I definitely am not and that is a feminist! I am an Orthodox Christian and I believe every person should be treated as I expect to be treated, with respect and love.
I have long maintained that much of what JP does is introduce Stoicism to a post-Christian (mostly male) audience. Accepting it will help ground them (what "based" means) and hopefully set them on the way.
Jordan Peterson is far more Christian than he is stoic
extremely inaccurate representation of him and his philosophy
Yes, I'd like to know what you mean by "Stoicism" -- the movement in ancient Greece based on the idea that reason is the highest human faculty and is to be used to make decisions? Or are you equating his calmness (though I can see his passion, he states it calmly with courtesy) as him being stoic?
@@juliawildasin4649 Stoicism, more in terms of attitude (pop Stoicism, you could call it) than any formal system.
That was the clearest description of the difference between equality of outcome and equality of opportunity well done 👏👏👏
Id like to compliment you on breaking those two types of equality down. For me that was a perfect example that clarified the differences. Bravo
I just found you. And I'm so glad! Love your intelligence.
They keep interrupting because they can't keep up with his multi-faceted ideas. They keep on trying to dumb it down, when (just as Jordan said) the devil is in the details.
I'm not arguing your point, but I will say, even though JP is very intelligent and articulate, with a great vocabulary and intellect, in at least this case, his viewpoint isn't very deep. It's very matter of fact and logical. Logic and rationale isn't usually deep, mental gymnastics and double talk is very deep and convoluted
Yes, and they have to "dumb it down" because they believe such dumb things.
Mtr keep doing these kinda break downs bro. Love your content
Very well said. Good description of equality of outcome. Equality of opportunity is what’s best for everyone in America!!!!
VERY TRUE....I love the way he addresses them with calmness
You are amazingly wise. Love to hear your thoughts. Thank you for all that you do.
Equality of outcome: people take a test, they all get the same score regardless of answers they give.
Equality of opportunity: we all have the opportunity to take the test, we get individual scores based on answers.
Which is more helpful in determining qualifications?
Well said brother you speak really well
Absolutely true bro, the way in which those two women tried to close frantically and then end the program just demonstrates that they don’t have any self arguments or ideas, just “feelings” and the world is NOT ruled by feelings
Thx for sharing this video.
Jordan Peterson is a gift to humanity and we need to protect him at all costs.
This is also why CZcams is cracking down on a lot of people that speak out against "the message."
They want no one to show an opposing pov and expose the hypocrisy of the leftist agenda.
Critical drinker quote?
@@thewebpro777 I usually hear it from Joker on his channel BetterBachelor.
I really appreciate you allowing the dialog to play out (and pausing it while interjecting minimally) I happen to agree with everything you said, but you let it be said unlike those TV witches who were looking for soundbites and gotchas and trying to trap Jordan, rather than meaningfully advancing the debate. Good on you, bud, keep at it.
I subscribed coz this guy seems one of the few sane, balanced person Ive come across on CZcams.
Protect JP at all costs!!! we need more of him in this world
Why is it about "moral outrage" instead of morals? Whose morals are they going by when they're outraged? Why doesn't absolute truth matter at all?
It is impossible to talk with this woman and I am impressed with Jordan's patience
Jordan Peterson you're awesome ! Been following you since 2017 . Stay you , keep up the good work ! We as a society need this ! ❤
Anyone can be accused of anything at any point in time. He said he didn't do it. We have to believe anything they say? Innocent peoples lives are ruined by this. It's unbelievable.
huh? he who? didn't do what? what innocent lives are ruined? what's unbelievable? Guess you were just ranting. Certainly your statement holds little clarity.
@@juliawildasin4649 Thank God you're policing comments! I commented on statements made in the video. Did you listen to the video?
I actually appreciated your inputs throughout this video. Very well done sir
There could not have been any greater fallacy than ascribing immoral acts to masculinity.
Your analysis was spot on the money, Jordan has the patience of a St and the skill to out manouver thier feminist agenda. The truth prevails.
This interview is a textbook example of how having a guest over is not to let him speak so that the audience can learn what he's all about, but rather an opportunity for the host to disseminate her ideology.
His argument is only partially right, and in trying to be politically correct (in some instances) he'll miss the true opportunity for a great argument. Feminism today is no longer about equality (or outcome of equality), today it is more about equity, and giving them the presumption of equality, all with a handicap. I am not a feminist, nor do i support feminism in any way, shape, form, or fashion...
someone once said "hiring based on equality of outcome only looks at what the person is, not who the person is"
When the other one said: "absolutely. I'm a very proud feminist" 😂😂😂 you know whats going to happen
Equality of outcome would only allow tall men to play in the NBA.
Equality of opportunity allowed short men like Mugsy Bogues, Spud Webb, and Isaiah Thomas to enter the league.
Equality of outcome is necessarily destructive and limiting. Equality of opportunity is necessarily productive and limitless.
With equality of outcome, the NBA would be 60.1% White (Non-Hispanic), 18.5% Hispanic, 12.2% Black, and 5.6% Asian.
WTF? Equality of outcome would ensure that short people would play in the NBA.
@@mattcorcoran7082 No, it wouldn't. Why in the hell would you ever choose a short player over a tall one? You need to reexamine what "equality of outcome" means.
@@cmbjive Equality of outcomes in the context of height in the NBA means that everyone would have an equal chance of playing in the NBA, regardless of height. The average height of players in the NBA would then be no different to the average height in society at large.
@mattcorcoran7082 Everyone does have an equal chance to play in the NBA, regardless of height. However, only 400 men will make it into the league. That is the meaning of equality of opportunity. However, with equality of outcome, each team would not want to be at a disadvantage of another and would discriminately choose to only get the tallest, strongest, and fastest men to play for them. No team would self- select to get a smaller player because it would immediately put them at a disadvantage.
I can see why you would think equality of outcome would ensure more smaller players, but completion does not get eliminated in socialist economies.
I’ve never liked when a “guest” goes onto a show and they’re badgered, interrupted, poked and prodded. Progressives tend to be guilty of bullying a conversation if what one says doesn’t fall in line with their viewpoint. Surely in some cases this behavior is due to a generally strong passion for the topic, thus unintentional… On the other side, especially in this day in age, bullying the topic of conv is just a way to try and assert dominance and an attempt at forcing a viewpoint onto one. Uncool
This is the difference of speaking from intelligence and fact, vs emotions and feelings.
Gender equality means dividing all good things equally between all genders and giving all struggles and risk to men.
Debating a woke leftist is them asking you a question and them interrupting your answer by answering it for you.
Exactly
Yep
This tactic they use is universal.
It may not be verbatim but main idea JP:
"If people don't listen to what you are saying then stop talking immediately and just watch them. And they will tell you everything they have in mind. By continuing talking to ppl who don't listen to you, you are only devaluing your point"
The problem with “anti-discrimination” is that it is simply an opposing discrimination. They are pushing anti discrimination, as opposed to equality.
Thank goodness for that pink dress! Common sense isn't common anymore. It's astounding what they want us to believe.
I feel so bad for this woman's husband, she's so good at driving you to insanity with gaslighting.
They never let him finish his points. He should just say he doesn’t feel respected and walk out
Yes, but I'm thankful he kept at it because then we get to hear real, well-thought-out ideas for once. Otherwise, the air is filled with nonsense.
Feminism is not being represented as it was originally meant. Feminism is just equality. Equality is not ‘the same’.
100 years since women got the vote, yet still not held accountable for the responsibility men had to gain that same privilege. Men got to vote for the family because they paid a direct price if they voted for war mongers. Women still have rights without responsibilities, men don't. Again, who's privileged?
What a BUNCH of NAGS ‼️
DECEMBER 2023
Verbal domestic abuse is a thing. Is it recognised?
It's more that men have been neutered, not that stereotypes have damaged them. There was footage of a bear which had been kept in captivity and used for entertainment for so long, it now just jumps on the spot (even though it has been rescued). Because it was broken, it ceased being a bear. This is the same as is happening to men
15:45 equality of outcome also would mean same pay for everyone at a position, regardless of performance.
Thereby removing any incentive to try to become better at something.