Charles Haywood on No Enemies to the Right, Foundationalism, & other Scary things!
Vložit
- čas přidán 18. 09. 2023
- Charles Haywood joins the podcast to talk about his political philosophy and respond to some of the objections to it.
#nettr #noenemiestotheright #foundationalism #charleshaywood
To Support the Podcast:
www.worldviewconversation.com...
Become a Patron
/ worldviewconversation
Follow Jon on Twitter: / jonharris1989
Follow Jon on Facebook:
/ worldviewconversation
Follow Jon on Gab:
gab.com/jonharris1989 - Zábava
I want to thank G3 for throwing a Twitter fit about Charles Haywood. If that never happened, I would never have cared about the man or known how awesome he was. Thanks again, G3.
Wow. Now I HAVE to find out more about this guy!
More Haywood and More Quinones please !!!
Have been watching a ton of Quinones and loving Haywood interviews too!!
absolutely!!
They are great
I feel like many Christians forget that when Jesus sent out his disciples he told them to be as wise as serpents because there are many wolves in the world. Being pragmatic is not inherently unChristian, especially when your enemies want to destroy you.
FANTASTIC INTERVIEW! I could have listened for another hour easy.
Charles is always a great listen
Thank you. Your best interview to date.
Best? Then, I want to get started on this one. 😉
Agreed
Jon I want to let you know, ever since you interviewed Paul Gottfried and started talking about paleoconservativism, your CZcams channel has become a lot more engaging.
I first started watching your channel because of social justice in the church 3 years ago but all your other content seemed aimless or unfocused. So I would barely watch your videos, but now I eagerly watch every video you post now. Keep up the good work👍
Ever since I started watching Jon's platform, subscribed to earlier this year, I have got to catch up. The social justice movement caught my attention as well and it all started with the attendance of a previous church that used quotes and promoted books by the late Timothy Keller. I still get a few red flags in the church that I attend presently. A really sound church seems to be the minority these days.
@@cat-bg3rvI have the same problem brother. I left my progressive mainline Protestant church I grew up in 7 years ago, and finally started going back to church this spring. It’s a large confessional Nondenominational Baptist church. They are theologically sound and orthodox, but they recommend too many big eva books and seem to be very wishy washy on how to approach the problems of our country.
I got to a Baptist church currently, can confirm Baptists are useless when it comes to approach a countries problems. Its just 'evangelise people lul' and then some stuff about how we can't force our beliefs on others.@@ShopRat-cf9tr
WOAH ....Did I just watch this on Conversations That Matter. WORLD Class Jon. I will be archiving this one. to watch it again.
Very educational and thought provoking. Excellent in many ways. Go Jon. Go Charles. Keep thinking and working through these things.
Great interview.
Always great to hear Charles Haywood
Charles looked kinda orange...
Thank you for the interview. Charles has some profound insights
Love the new Logo!
This man is interesting.
More of this - please
I've listened to and watched many of these shows and this ranks near if not at the top. Great interview. Very interesting, thought provoking guest Jon.
Great guest
Fun!
I am here to give you back your future
I agree with CH's point that the enlightenment (as it formed on the ground) was a 'tower of babel' 2.0, 3.0, etc, which led to Hagel, post modernism, and the like. In a sense, enlightenment is a misnomer and a precursor to 'woke'. You could take some of the orginal God-centered western values that also led to the scientific revolution [so called] which presumed God's character as the start of what came next. Then enlightenment took those scietinfic revolution axioms (God could have made the physical laws immutable like he is; and man was created with faculty of reason to observe said laws), and kicked out the prime mover and made man the god and reason as assumed reality.
22:25 what is leftism?
25:00 leftism and the founding of America
Woah, mega based!
It would be neat if you had Alex Newman on.
Discrimination of various kinds are the way we make informed decisions every day, so I agree, there is nothing inherently wrong with discriminating. It doesn't meant we have to degrade or brutally harm others related to it. You can still be open to 'other' things. But we also shouldn't be pathologically altruistic in decision making or just f-ing stupid. Decide what you like based on intelligent reasoning and don't be ashamed of it. Then act on that principle.
If we could meld Foundationalism with NeoNationalism and Vedanta, we might achieve a tempered and winning combination. Haywood would also have an army, some of them very well trained and well armed. That moment of instability and chaos is coming soon when the niche for a new government to arise will present itself. May Zog fall.
Ideology flows downward from power. We imported a new ruling class from Eastern Europe and they brought their ideology with them.
10:20 - women shouldn’t be in politics whatsoever.
I thought it was interesting that CH said that enlightenment thinking led to a demand for complete equality ( or something like that). I can see the truth in this. However, when you step back and look at the Bible and what it has to say, it is obvious that it stresses that all men are equal before the law and every person has equal value. It seems like America reflects this Biblical truth in a way that a lot of hierarchical government structures don't. Also, God didn't want Israel to have a king and raised up judges (who didn't seem to have the same exalted worldly position as kings) When I reflect on the blessing that God gives to pursue happiness and have liberty, I am extremely thankful for the American founding.
I would critique your analysis by saying that what the Bible says about equality is different then how it is defined by enlightenment liberalism. The Bible says we are equal before God, but we are not the same before God. God made us male and female with different roles and responsibilities according to our gender. He also created us with different gifts and talents, and uses some of us for common purposes and others more extraordinarily. Liberalism has turned that on itself. Instead of using our differences to glorify God by using them in His service, we now use them to indulge in selfish individuality, or take our perceived inadequacies and use them as evidence of injustice.
OK. We've tried your all men are equal thing and tried democracy out. We've given democracy a good, hard try for a very long time now.
Has it worked? Would you say democracy is good for morals and family life, yes or no.
🤔 Nothing really to see here. The mystery of why G3 hates CN so much remains partially shrouded
Couldn't agree more.
Like the men of Issachar, understand the times you live in. No enemies on the Right.
Interesting discussion. He had some good political points. Had to laugh about his answers for joining the EO church - “more Christ & not feminized at all”
I'm not EO but an EO service is much less feminine than most Protestant services. Even the PCA and SBC services I've been to over the last 20 years are usually full of breathy, feminine music with men waving their hands and bodies around like young girls at a pop concert.
@@johnp7739 if you don’t know the theology, sure. EO is defined by holding council consensus equal to but more often higher than Scripture. So, by what standard does their service have “more of Christ?” It’s not Scripture. Both these things make it very feminized. Many PCA and SBC services are now indeed liberal and no longer following Scripture either.
@@johnp7739 while i'm not a fan of much of the breathy music style, and definitely have my qualms w PCA and SBC, i think it's really shameful and dangerous to judge people based on their worship of God. Michal was barren her whole life because she despised David's naked dance.
@@CopeSeetheEtc1 Where do you draw the line then? Twerking? Mosh pits? That's the problem with moral relativism. We have many great hymns and Psalms and 2,000 years of church history. There's no reason a "solid confessional" church should be singing 3-chord pop/folk songs with choruses that are vainly repetitive (something the Bible forbids). Look up "Gracefully Graces Me" (a parody, but I've heard stuff almost that bad) and explain why people are singing that instead of "Immortal Invisible God Only Wise."
I hardly see how David's dance (right or wrong) is relevant to this topic.
You don't see how someone judging someone for dancing naked publically before God is relevant to you judging someone's song of worship for having too many chorus repititions?
(in fact -- many Psalms and old-school hymns you reference repeat things over and over.)
I'm not a fan of the weak, watered-down theology of most of today's worship songs and I'm not saying they'd be my choice either. But I am not going to judge someone for waving their hands in worship just because I think that might be "inappropriate". Focus on your own heart before God instead of worrying whether someone around you is raising their hands or dancing naked. @@johnp7739
Where is your guest's ability to distinguish his public theology from Macievelli. Did he say he is Eastern Orthodox?
Haywood Jablowme.
" ... there is a recognition that the right has failed and we need a new rallying point ...", said Jon Harris, speaking of Christian Nationalism and all these approaches like Foundationalism.
So, .... do you believe the US Constitution needs to be replaced?
Would you be happy living under CH's foundational manifesto? If not, why not?
How do you propose to correct and reform without violating man's right to life, liberty and property? Or, do you propose a system without these rights except when the authoritarian government grants them for good behavior?
Do you believe our nation can be "fixed" using a top down model? Or, do you believe that true reform can only be realized by a work of God's Holy Spirit in the hearts of men?
The U.S. Constitution is not perfect and needs work. There are issues with it.
There is no such thing as rights that are not secured by the government. One can demand that one has rights all one wants, but unless someone with power secures them, then one does not have those rights.
The constitution has already been replaced many times.
@@gch8810 So, .... you disagree with the founding fathers that " ... these truths are self-evident ..."? You deny any higher authority than the government?
@@dws2313 Yes, Mr. D.W. What an excellent synthesis of what has been said here. You must be well acquainted with the CTM Posse, every last one of the people who tune in do so because we believe wholeheartedly that there is NO higher authority than manmade government (Especially unelected bureaucrats! They are the most incontrovertible of all authority figures!), all proud statists here. 😵💫I've reported you to the Bureau of Passive Aggressive Grammar, who will be sending you a ticket in the mail for your unlawful excess of ellipses. And yes, the Constitution IS the Declaration of Independence, both of which are FLAWLESS, SACRED TEXTS which, if you follow them just a LITTLE HARDER will REPAIR EVERY FACET of our society that has degraded since the 18th century.
@@dws2313 These truths are not self-evident. These truths come from an authority, namely God through his Church.
This is besides the point though. I never said that the government is the highest authority. However, realistically, rights only exist if secured by the government.
Natural Law is having your cake and eating it too?
What on earth is this guy talking in regards to witchcraft not being real. Also he thinks National Socialism is right wing. Huh???
Jon, Jon, Jon...this guy is EO. This is dangerous.
I like getting exposed to these other guys, thanks Jon.
"There's more of Christ in orthodoxy"..........orthodoxy denies justification by faith in Christ alone. Yall unfortunately therefore don't have Christ at all Galatians 5:4