Lee Smolin: Quantum Gravity and Einstein's Unfinished Revolution | Lex Fridman Podcast #79

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 28. 04. 2024
  • Lee Smolin is a theoretical physicist, co-inventor of loop quantum gravity, and a contributor of many interesting ideas to cosmology, quantum field theory, the foundations of quantum mechanics, theoretical biology, and the philosophy of science. He is the author of several books including one that critiques the state of physics and string theory called The Trouble with Physics, and his latest book, Einstein's Unfinished Revolution: The Search for What Lies Beyond the Quantum.
    This episode is presented by Cash App. Download it & use code "LexPodcast":
    Cash App (App Store): apple.co/2sPrUHe
    Cash App (Google Play): bit.ly/2MlvP5w
    PODCAST INFO:
    Podcast website:
    lexfridman.com/podcast
    Apple Podcasts:
    apple.co/2lwqZIr
    Spotify:
    spoti.fi/2nEwCF8
    RSS:
    lexfridman.com/feed/podcast/
    Full episodes playlist:
    • Lex Fridman Podcast
    Clips playlist:
    • Lex Fridman Podcast Clips
    EPISODE LINKS:
    Books mentioned:
    - Einstein's Unfinished Revolution by Lee Smolin: amzn.to/2TsF5c3
    - The Trouble With Physics by Lee Smolin: amzn.to/2v1FMzy
    - Against Method by Paul Feyerabend: amzn.to/2VOPXCD
    OUTLINE:
    0:00 - Introduction
    3:03 - What is real?
    5:03 - Scientific method and scientific progress
    24:57 - Eric Weinstein and radical ideas in science
    29:32 - Quantum mechanics and general relativity
    47:24 - Sean Carroll and many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics
    55:33 - Principles in science
    57:24 - String theory
    CONNECT:
    - Subscribe to this CZcams channel
    - Twitter: / lexfridman
    - LinkedIn: / lexfridman
    - Facebook: / lexfridmanpage
    - Instagram: / lexfridman
    - Medium: / lexfridman
    - Support on Patreon: / lexfridman
  • Věda a technologie

Komentáře • 368

  • @lexfridman
    @lexfridman  Před 4 lety +119

    I really enjoyed this conversation with Lee. Here's the outline:
    0:00 - Introduction
    3:03 - What is real?
    5:03 - Scientific method and scientific progress
    24:57 - Eric Weinstein and radical ideas in science
    29:32 - Quantum mechanics and general relativity
    47:24 - Sean Carroll and many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics
    55:33 - Principles in science
    57:24 - String theory

    • @ivangalabov2910
      @ivangalabov2910 Před 4 lety +14

      Lex, bud, you gotta let people finish their thoughts before you assault them with more questions.

    • @sebacaine6974
      @sebacaine6974 Před 4 lety +3

      Oooh, Lee Smolin. Still would have preferred Nima Arkani-Hamed, but this should be a great episode.

    • @johnpetkos5686
      @johnpetkos5686 Před 4 lety +2

      Thank you for this great interview! I really love it that you ask the most fundamental questions repeatedly, so we establish the answers! Really great job! Thank you!

    • @christinedantas
      @christinedantas Před 4 lety

      Thanks! I suggested him recently in a comment to you, and coincidently or not, here he is! :) Your podcasts are excellent. :)

    • @maxlieberman578
      @maxlieberman578 Před 4 lety

      David Deutsch please!!!

  • @dustinsoodak6238
    @dustinsoodak6238 Před 4 lety +50

    He has a really clear categorization of his beliefs, assumptions, and level of expertise. It is refreshing to hear statements like "I haven't studied that theory sufficiently to comment on it".

  • @tubbyoneness
    @tubbyoneness Před 4 lety +20

    “...the theoretical physics community. This community has its respected academics,its naked emperors, it’s outcasts and its revolutionaries, it’s madmen and it’s dreamers.” - What a beautiful description!

  • @rc5989
    @rc5989 Před 4 lety +26

    This conversation is so good, I am enjoying listening to it multiple times. Lots of great insights to unpack in every listening. Thanks Lex!

  • @nozfirat
    @nozfirat Před 4 lety +24

    Thanks, for being a bridge, between us and those leading brightest people.

  • @AngusRockford
    @AngusRockford Před 4 lety +11

    Thank you so much for having Dr. Smolin on. One of my favorite lecturers and writers on physics.

    • @1eV
      @1eV Před 7 měsíci

      are his lecture available online?

  • @mitchellhayman381
    @mitchellhayman381 Před 10 měsíci +2

    Smolin is a genius and a great man. Humble, honest and sincere

  • @egorpanfilov
    @egorpanfilov Před 4 lety +12

    Already looking forward to seeing the second appearance of Lee on your podcast. Great interview!

  • @curiosguy9852
    @curiosguy9852 Před 4 lety +212

    It would be awesome if you could get Terence Tao or Ed Witten!!

  • @shagablabas
    @shagablabas Před 4 lety +29

    Blessing us with great content Lex

  • @cagefury3789
    @cagefury3789 Před 4 lety +22

    As a layman, Lee Smolin is one of my favorite physicists. I've heard some of his lectures before, and his ideas are extremely refreshing in regards to the nature of reality, time, and philosophy of science. I only wish he was younger so he had more time to really follow through with them.

    • @PaulMarostica
      @PaulMarostica Před 3 lety +1

      Lee is on the right track, but he hasn't yet gone far enough. Both quantum theory and relativity theory are flawed. Each has some incorrect assumptions. Melding those 2 theories won't eliminate those incorrect assumptions. But here's the good news. The theory all realists want already exists. My unifying physics theory, matter theory, is a realist theory which explains 23 fundamental physics observables the standard model can not explain. Also, matter theory permanently eliminates from physics theory the illogic of all 6 current professionally used physics theories. Search keywords: matter theory marostica.

  • @victorsavona2314
    @victorsavona2314 Před 4 lety +8

    This is a very good podcast in general. Lex raises the level of difficulty understanding the material, but still unwraps it into form for someone who wants to know more about a subject, but still lacks the technical understanding one would gain from studying the subject.

  • @koshnaranek3062
    @koshnaranek3062 Před 4 lety +21

    the luggage thing got me rolling on the floor

  • @acangial1
    @acangial1 Před 4 lety +27

    Wheels on the luggage. Wow, that statement was so profound!

    • @Pussik
      @Pussik Před 2 lety

      Profound metaphore and bold statement?

    • @123Coffs
      @123Coffs Před 2 lety +1

      Not really because some people prefer to keep things simple and carry a bag. Sometimes simpler is better. Also, you need nice flat smooth flooring and no steps for wheels on a bag to make sense. It wouldn’t surprise me if they all considered adding wheels to their bags and then thought - no it’s easier without.

    • @nina-gd6bm
      @nina-gd6bm Před 2 lety

      what are the wheels representing in this metaphor ?

  • @mtumasz
    @mtumasz Před 3 lety +8

    Lex had harf time connecting but I hope he gives it a 2nd listen one day and get the WOW I got fron this podcast. Lee has some very good 1st principles ideas here❤️

  • @cary9176
    @cary9176 Před 2 lety +1

    Just found you Lex and want to say thanks for making this content from all my heroes in Physics easily accessible. KUDOS

  • @fightwatcherspro
    @fightwatcherspro Před 4 lety +47

    At this point i'm pressing like before I watch the episode.

    • @lst1nwndrlnd
      @lst1nwndrlnd Před 4 lety

      At this point I'm pressing like before I finish reading your comment.

    • @nagualdesign
      @nagualdesign Před 4 lety +1

      That rather defeats the purpose of the Like button.

  • @aaronwilliams1143
    @aaronwilliams1143 Před 4 lety +12

    By far one of the greatest guests on the show. Thank you so much for this podcast Lex. The nature of time being more fundamental than space and events that cause events within the causality of the speed of light was a major breakthrough to me. The notion that the order of causality being a non-spatial property of time is revolutionary. Lee Smolin is an absolute genius.

    • @Mrmistershesh
      @Mrmistershesh Před 3 lety

      I don't remember him actually mentioning the speed of light and I think that was deliberate. I think the problem with trying to use the speed of light as a way of understanding causality and emergent space from fundamental time is putting the cart before the horse; how do you define speed without first defining distance (space)?

  • @aesirvanir8671
    @aesirvanir8671 Před 4 lety +39

    Mein Gott, this is fantastic! Guest suggestions: Grigori Perelman; Edward Witten; Douglas Hofstadter; Cosma Rohilla Shalizi.

    • @ProjectNoid
      @ProjectNoid Před 4 lety +25

      You'd have more luck reanimating Dirac's corpse for a podcast than getting Grigori Perelman to be involved in any kind of a conversation. Not that I wouldn't want that.

    • @lexfridman
      @lexfridman  Před 4 lety +32

      @@ProjectNoid Just you wait ;-)

    • @rajatbakshi6587
      @rajatbakshi6587 Před 4 lety

      @@lexfridman can you bring Joe Rogan??

    • @AndDiracisHisProphet
      @AndDiracisHisProphet Před 4 lety +5

      @@ProjectNoid want what? reanimating Dirac's corpse?

    • @ProjectNoid
      @ProjectNoid Před 4 lety +1

      @@AndDiracisHisProphet Yes, that too.

  • @mbaske7114
    @mbaske7114 Před 4 lety +64

    I take a shot of russian vodka whenever Lex says "linger".

  • @tiberiupaslaru3830
    @tiberiupaslaru3830 Před rokem +1

    Lee Smolin is a great thinker of our time.
    Great job Lex for bringing him onboard your ship for questioning :)

  • @oliver-rn6lu
    @oliver-rn6lu Před 4 lety +7

    Love this podcast. I like your inclusion of philosophy.

  • @alexwhb122
    @alexwhb122 Před 4 lety

    Yet another fascinating talk. Thank you for the great content!

  • @guysimple8491
    @guysimple8491 Před 4 lety +3

    I like how his ideas emerges in popular literature, for example in Peter Watts books. By the way, it would be wonderful if Lex could invite him to this podcast.

  • @oledilep
    @oledilep Před 2 lety

    not only the guest is important, the questions and bouncing of ideas is aswell. you do it very well.

  • @AdamPitas
    @AdamPitas Před 4 lety +1

    Amazing interview, Lex. Thanks!

  • @ApacheeB
    @ApacheeB Před 4 lety +4

    Lex, please, interview William Gibson. It is a wish dear to my heart.
    Thank you for all the hours of ingenious interviews!

  • @isedairi
    @isedairi Před 2 lety +1

    Lex we need a second part with Lee!!

  • @AndyPynch
    @AndyPynch Před 4 lety +11

    Love you Lex! Keep it up

  • @guitarnutbolinuli5788
    @guitarnutbolinuli5788 Před 4 lety +2

    Great conversation; I love it. Thanks Lex.

  • @travisfitzwater8093
    @travisfitzwater8093 Před 2 lety +1

    Lee is among my top 5 favorite thinkers. I am not inclined to quarrel with him.

  • @brianbielawne9801
    @brianbielawne9801 Před 4 lety +1

    Keep up the great work lex! 👍🏻

  • @chrishumphries1516
    @chrishumphries1516 Před rokem

    I really enjoy the podcast you do ! Thank you Lex !

  • @georgemccaffery3260
    @georgemccaffery3260 Před 4 lety +4

    Wow, another big name, Lex. Please keep 'em coming!

  • @drewmetra
    @drewmetra Před 2 lety

    amazing. been a fan of Lee's for years. never knew what he looked like though.
    great conversation. enjoyed myself immensely. ty

  • @evanwillenson1398
    @evanwillenson1398 Před 4 lety +1

    haven't even gotten into the interview yet but DAMN great intro Lex.!

  • @hansmachado9163
    @hansmachado9163 Před 2 lety

    Thank you, Lex, again and again and again, for doing THIS!

  • @ferrantepallas
    @ferrantepallas Před 5 měsíci

    Smolin is wonderful! What an exemplar!

  • @mtumasz
    @mtumasz Před 3 lety

    Lee’s final statement beautifully expresses a general principle of science world being able to reorganise and see beyond some of the impactless divisions.

  • @honestinsky
    @honestinsky Před 4 lety +3

    Excellent podcast Lex, you da man. A+

  • @georgetacarmen8824
    @georgetacarmen8824 Před rokem

    I enjoyed this conversation.
    :-)
    These podcasts are of great value to me.
    :-)

  • @AngusRockford
    @AngusRockford Před 4 lety +25

    I’d also very much love to hear Dr. Smolin discuss his ideas in depth with Sean Carroll on Sean’s podcast. I’ve said the same to Sean online.

  • @sirilandgren
    @sirilandgren Před 4 lety +4

    Lee is such a valuable influence to the physics community! ❤️

  • @davidfield8122
    @davidfield8122 Před 4 lety +1

    What an ambitious interview

  • @martifingers
    @martifingers Před 3 lety +6

    So great to see Feyerabend taken seriously by such a brilliant mind as Professor Smolin. Feyerabend is not universally admired I think it's fair to say but his arguments are very important to take on board.

    • @mitchellhayman381
      @mitchellhayman381 Před 10 měsíci

      Thanks for writing the man's name in the comments. I've never heard that name and would never have been able to find his writing without your comment.

  • @aaronfrank9649
    @aaronfrank9649 Před 2 lety

    What a great and accurate description of the ethics and training required to be a good scientist.

  • @2010sunshine
    @2010sunshine Před 3 lety

    Wonderful conversation 👍👌

  • @buddhasarchive8385
    @buddhasarchive8385 Před 2 lety

    really enjoyed listening to Lee Smolin

  • @hossromani
    @hossromani Před 4 lety +1

    Way to go Lex, thanks

  • @aaronfrank9649
    @aaronfrank9649 Před 2 lety

    I really admire Mr. Smolin.

  • @monte1118
    @monte1118 Před 4 lety +3

    Wow great conversation! It would be cool if you could get a couple people from varying fields to converse together.

  • @saurabhkulshreshtha8953
    @saurabhkulshreshtha8953 Před 4 lety +55

    xD 10:15 Yo I'm a scientist!

    • @CarlosRivera-wx3dv
      @CarlosRivera-wx3dv Před 3 lety +1

      Been laughing so hard all day since i listen the podcast this morning. I search it in video just for this part 😂😂😂

    • @Hexanitrobenzene
      @Hexanitrobenzene Před 3 lety

      It's even funnier when contrasted with his overall slow manner of speaking. So unexpected :)

  • @LiftingHard1989
    @LiftingHard1989 Před 4 lety

    Such a good discussion

  • @jladosky23
    @jladosky23 Před 4 lety +1

    Yoooooooo! On a Saturday night!?!? We love you lex! SALUTE

  • @mspoints4fre123
    @mspoints4fre123 Před 2 lety

    Lee's idea of each type of particle or molecule having its own "view" of the universe, and thus linking every single one of these particles with one another of the same type, and differentiates them from other particles with other "views", because they have different properties. And creates a kind of cosmic web of objects of the same type with one another, which could possibly explain things such as quantum entanglement and instantaneous action at a distance, is really fascinating.

    • @Kobe29261
      @Kobe29261 Před rokem

      Which also offers a predictive model for understanding memory; what Feyman described as 'last weeks potato remembering what a skin cell should be'

  • @ericjane747
    @ericjane747 Před 4 lety +2

    Very much enjoyed this conversation. Makes me feel normal.

  • @allanbrondum
    @allanbrondum Před 4 lety

    It may sound lazy, but it would be nice if you put links in the description to the podcasts you recommend also listening to in the podcast intro.

  • @MrStosh12345
    @MrStosh12345 Před 4 lety +4

    One of the most brilliant minds I’ve listen to in 2020,Thank you for this podcast Lex. Conversations like these give me hope for a better tomorrow. Understanding reality is a very beautiful abstraction. Reality itself is a special force that exist with in the universal truth of human nature. Love everything you do, god bless you!

    • @MrStosh12345
      @MrStosh12345 Před 4 lety

      Had to bring god into the equation

    • @MrStosh12345
      @MrStosh12345 Před 4 lety

      LoL 😂 ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️wash your hands

    • @MrStosh12345
      @MrStosh12345 Před 4 lety

      The luggage thing came to mind about months ago while carrying hockey equipment. I had to fumble the whole way out from of the car open the doors hurt my back twist and turned with the strap on the bag. I made my thoughts very present in clear to other people I don’t think they understood what I was trying to tell them. How long did it take to put wheels on a bag? How long does it take to have a robotic bag to tracks and follows you through a parking lot, shopping centre, airport, or mall? I don’t belong here! I’m sad 😞

  • @mr.wizard9785
    @mr.wizard9785 Před 3 lety +1

    What about the breakthroughs in thermodynamics that took place from the late-18th to the 19th centuries that enabled developments/ applications in chemistry, states of matter, and inventions such as the steam engine?

  • @ChauSung
    @ChauSung Před 4 lety +11

    It just seems Lex can get all the big daddies on his broadcast. Here is the challenge, Shinichi Mochizuki.

  • @RenePlougsgaard
    @RenePlougsgaard Před 4 lety +1

    Wonder if you ever could interview Neil Turok, i realy like his views, and thanks for a amazing channel.

  • @josephbertrand5558
    @josephbertrand5558 Před 4 lety +1

    Amazing as usual 😁😁😁😁

  • @aaronfrank9649
    @aaronfrank9649 Před 2 lety

    What a kind man. I’m very impressed.

  • @dmitrysamoilov5989
    @dmitrysamoilov5989 Před 4 lety +33

    25:06 About the Luggage: Flat Surfaces are a relatively modern invention. Before that you had bricks and mud and uneven floorboards. So, It wasn't a fact of nobody had thought of it. The fact was that it wasn't practical back then.
    Expanding this idea to thoughts, it also may be the case that: It simply is not practical to think in a more "correct" way until certain "surfaces" of thought have been "flattened".
    I don't know what that means, but, meh. Whatever. !

    • @zenchess
      @zenchess Před 4 lety +2

      "Flat Surfaces are a modern invention" - Better lay off that crack pipe

    • @dmitrysamoilov5989
      @dmitrysamoilov5989 Před 4 lety +10

      Zenchess
      Would you be happier if I said: the wide adoption of flat surfaces into almost all facets of life-

    • @dmitrysamoilov5989
      @dmitrysamoilov5989 Před 4 lety

      @@skierpage tru tru

    • @mirroredname3389
      @mirroredname3389 Před 4 lety

      @@skierpage very nice.

    • @puppetperception7861
      @puppetperception7861 Před 4 lety +1

      Went looking for this comment and found it. Before uniform surfaces people did use carts and wagons. I believe your metaphor is more accurate which alleviates the accusation of human nature as being naturally flawed (original sin). The expansion of your metaphor defines how ideas are reduced from complexity which provides a landscape for information that is new or significant to be expressed, recognized, and adopted. The inaccuracy of the metaphor is anywhere these newly flattened surfaces are perceived as totally detached from the process of applying new information for that was how it found the significance. It was why the surfaces were flattened.

  • @jondor654
    @jondor654 Před měsícem

    What appears be an ultimate appeal through understanding to intuition seems to reify the foundational reality of our sense perception complex .

  • @reddragon2335
    @reddragon2335 Před 4 lety +3

    Third, but first at heart.
    Your content is excellent.
    You inspire the world to pursue knowledge and higher learning.
    Education is critical to saving the universe.

    • @mika274
      @mika274 Před 3 lety

      Why does the universe need saving

  • @wicekwickowski3798
    @wicekwickowski3798 Před rokem

    Lex Fridman. Many thanks for sharing the statements of such a wise scientist, seeker of the answer to the question: what is closer to the truth?

  • @peterivers2
    @peterivers2 Před rokem

    I love these conversations, they are so interesting. Regarding Smolin's definition of realism, he says it is a belief. Beliefs are creations of the human mind.

  • @jorgespinha
    @jorgespinha Před 4 lety

    great podcast

  • @OlleMattsson
    @OlleMattsson Před 4 lety +1

    Instaliked based on title alone

  • @trax9987
    @trax9987 Před 3 lety

    One of the most beautiful people and one of the most beautiful podcasts ever made Lex. He has a fantastic mind. It's absolutely fantastic you found him and were able to get him.

  • @rickharold7884
    @rickharold7884 Před 3 lety

    Fascinating thx

  • @AffectiveApe
    @AffectiveApe Před 5 měsíci

    Hi Folks! Many of the concepts discussed here can be further explored in the work of Carlo Ravelli. I recently finished reading his book Helgoland, and many of the points/clarifications that Lee is trying to get across to Lex are much clearer to me having read that book. I encourage others to explore that as well. The book is beautifully written and digestible to the non-specialist.

  • @snappycattimesten
    @snappycattimesten Před rokem

    Smolin has an attractive thoughtfulness and intellect. I like how he sometimes struggles to articulate the deeper constructs his brilliant mind is bubbling up to consciousness.

  • @shawnUT1960
    @shawnUT1960 Před 2 lety +2

    I think it's available right here and now to experience the absolute reality. Meditators have done it for thousands of years.

  • @Karl_Selbiger
    @Karl_Selbiger Před rokem +1

    Regarding 'Einstein carried his luggage' at 25:00 it might be interesting to check Robert Shiller's 'Narrative Economics' pp. 38-39 about suitcases with wheels. Shiller writes that the patent for trunks on wheels is from 1887 and he tells how it finally succeeded and went viral when flight crews adopted the Rollaboards in the 1990s.

  • @mavrosyvannah
    @mavrosyvannah Před rokem +1

    I am at the least 2,009 years 3 months, 23 days, 12 hours, 17 minutes, 43 seconds ahead of the world. Time to get a new watch.

  • @roelrovira5148
    @roelrovira5148 Před 2 měsíci

    Lee and Lex, Quantum Gravity and the theory, mathematic, laws, reproducible experiments and observations that underpinned it, is crucial for an empirical real true Quantum Theory of Gravity that would finish Einstein's Revolution in physics. The Mathematics that we have today can't solve the problem of quantum gravitation.

    Mathematics is invented and discovered. That's my personal experience. I've invented/discovered a completely new mathematics in the course of my 30-year-long basic research on Quantum Gravity in Singapore. I called it Majulah Matematika in honour of my home country Singapore. I use it to solve one of the most difficult conundrums in physics- the True Nature of Gravity.
    Here is one of the many solutions that my new mathematics has derived: A Computer Universe that is real. It is run by Quantum Gravitational Computation, Quantum Gravitational Entanglement and Quantum Gravitation covering the entire Universe. An empirical Theory of Quantum Gravity is the key. And it will led us to understanding of how and why Gravity works. It will also at the same time, debunk and invalidate String Theory, Loop Quantum Gravity, M Theory, Theory of General Relativity and all failed and wrong theories of gravity. But it will proved and validate Einstein's Hidden Variables and EPR's authors Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen correct. The Hidden variables are: Quantum Gravity, Quantum Anti-Gravity, Quantum Neutral Gravity, the macroscopic cosmic scale Gravitational Quantum Entanglement and Gravitational Quantum Computation. All these would complete the Quantum Foundation, Unification of Gravity with Quantum Mechanics and the realization of Theory of Everything in Physics.
    I have discovered and cracked the code of the true nature of Gravity in my over 30 years of basic research works in Singapore. This discovery/invention/theory of mine include THE GOD EQUATION - THE TRINITY Equations, Laws and Codes For QUANTUM GRAVITATION , QUANTUM GRAVITATIONAL ENTANGLE MENT and GRAVITATIONAL QUANTUM COMPUTATION that pave the way for Theory of Everything in Physics: - THE 3-in-1 HOLY GRAILS of Physics:
    1. Quantum Anti-Gravity/Spin Up Quantum Gravitational Entanglement/0 Rhu Bit or R Bit:
    QAG = ∆QGOρ < ∆QGFρ = ↑α
    2. Quantum Gravity/Spin Down Quantum Gravitational Entanglement/1 Rhu Bit or R Bit:
    QG = ∆QGOρ > ∆QGFρ = ↓α
    3. Quantum Neutral Gravity/Superposition Quantum Gravitational Entanglement/01 and/or 10 Rhu Bit or R Bit:
    QNG = ∆QGOρ = ∆QGFρ = ↑↓α
    We now have a working Quantum Theory of Gravity that is testable and complete with reproducible empirical experiments with the same results if repeated over and over again and again, confirmed by empirical observations in nature with 7-Sigma level results, guided by empirical Laws, Cosmic/Universal Computation and physical/mathematical Trinity God Equations that are predictive, precise and does no collapse even in high energies of Big Bang and singularity of Black Hole. FYI: Quantum Gravity or Quantum Gravitation have three types that are equivalent to and manifested by Quantum Computational Gravitation- the biggest and most powerful Computer Software Program and Hardware in the Universe and Quantum Gravitational Entanglement - a Quantum Entanglement at Macroscopic Cosmic Scale namely: 1. Quantum Anti-Gravity = Spin Up Quantum Entanglement State; 2. Quantum Neutral Gravity = Superposition Quantum Entanglement State; and 3. Quantum Gravity = Spin Down Quantum Entanglement State.
    More detailed information could be found on the published papers 2 years ago in London, Paris, and Zurich, online and at the two scientific Journals ACADEMIA and REAL TRUE NATURE. Alternatively, you can google the name of the author ROEL REAL ROVIRA to arrive at the published paper on Quantum Gravity.
    Most recently, additional two well respected scientific journals namely NATURE and the AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY APS Physical Review Journals have officially invited this author to submit manuscripts on his Research on Quantum Gravity for publication for PRX QUANTUM in preparation for a celebration for International Year of Quantum IYQ 2025 to showcase the best papers of the year.
    Quantum Gravitation is governed by and follow the Trinity Laws, Mathematics and Physics of Quantum Gravitation, Gravitational Quantum Computation and Quantum Gravitational Entanglement. We now have a new Laws of Physics and two newly discovered Fundamental Forces of Nature - The Quantum Neutral Gravity and Quantum Anti-Gravity which completed the heart of the Quantum Theory of Gravity published in London. Paris and Zurich last December 2022 as follows:

    1. First Law of Quantum Gravitation: Rovira’s Universal Law of Quantum Gravitation:
    “The greater mass density of gravitating Quantum Objects than the Quantum
    Gravitational Field causes a downward acceleration of the Quantum Objects in a
    Quantum Gravitational Field instantaneously mediated by Graviton.”
    - Roel Real Rovira
    Equation for Quantum Gravity, and Spin Down Quantum Gravitational Entanglement:
    QG = ∆QGOρ > ∆QGFρ = ↓α
    Where:
    QG is Quantum Gravity in Rovira (value of downward acceleration force due to quantum gravity) in kg.
    ∆QGOρ is Differential Change in greater mass density of Quantum Gravitating Objects than the mass density of Quantum Gravitational Field in kg/m2 or g/cm3.
    ∆QGFρ is Differential Change in mass density of Quantum Gravitational Field in kg/m2 or g/cm3.
    ↓α is the Resultant Downward Acceleration of Gravitating Quantum Objects in mtr/sec.
    2. Second Law of Quantum Gravitation: Rovira’s Universal Law of Quantum Anti-Gravity.
    “The lesser mass density of gravitating Quantum Objects than the Quantum Gravitational
    Field causes an upward acceleration of the Quantum Objects in a Quantum Gravitational
    Field instantaneously mediated by Graviton.”
    -Roel Real Rovira
    Equation for Quantum Anti-Gravity/Spin Up Quantum Gravitational Entanglement:
    QAG = ∆QGOρ < ∆QGFρ = ↑α

    Where:
    QAG is Quantum Anti-Gravity in Rovira (value of upward acceleration force due to quantum anti-gravity) in kg.
    ∆QGOρ is Differential Change in lesser mass density of Quantum Anti-Gravitating Objects than the mass density of Quantum Gravitational Field in kg/m2 or g/cm3.
    ∆QGFρ is Differential Change in mass density of Quantum Gravitational Field in kg/m2 or g/cm3.
    ↑α is the Resultant Upward Acceleration of Anti-Gravitating Quantum Objects in mtr/sec.
    3. Third Law of Quantum Gravitation: Rovira’s Law of Quantum Neutral Gravitation.
    “The equal mass density of gravitating Quantum Objects and the Quantum Gravitational
    Field causes a zero acceleration or floating or hoovering of the gravitating Quantum Objects
    in a Quantum Gravitational Field, instantaneously mediated by Graviton.”
    - Roel real Rovira
    Equation for Quantum Neutral Gravity and Superposition Quantum Gravitational Entanglement:
    QNG = ∆QGOρ = ∆QGFρ = ↑↓α
    Where:
    QNG is Quantum Neutral Gravity in Rovira (value of zero acceleration force due to quantum neutral gravity) in kg.
    ∆QGOρ is Differential Change in equal mass density of Quantum Neutral Gravitating Objects to the mass density of Quantum Gravitational Field in kg/m2 or g/cm3.
    ∆QGFρ is Differential Change in mass density of Quantum Gravitational Field in kg/m2 or g/cm3.
    ↑↓0α is the Resultant zero acceleration or non-acceleration of Neutral Gravitating Quantum Objects in mtr/sec.
    For more detailed information on these 3-in-1 Trinity Laws and Equations for Quantum Gravitation, Gravitational Quantum Computation, and Quantum Gravitational Entanglement - The Real True Nature of Quantum Gravitation, look it up at the two scientific journals ACADEMIA and REAL TRUE NATURE or google the name of the author ROEL REAL ROVIRA.
    Copyright 2022 ROEL REAL ROVIRA. All Rights Reserved.

  • @ioulton9861
    @ioulton9861 Před 2 lety

    Amazing and beautiful thanks Lex

  • @tekannon7803
    @tekannon7803 Před 4 lety +3

    Dear Mr Fridman and Professor Smollin, Thanks to you Mr Fridman, you offer a platform for global debate. Professor Smollin has stimulated my thinking into realizing (rightly or wrongly) that what time is basically is the ‘consciousness’ of the universe. What do I mean by that? What I mean is that time allows the mind to comprehend the series of events that follow one after into what we call the past. The present is time showing us its face in fleeting images of unfolding events. Nature has evolved what we call time as simply the way one can put cascading events into a pattern. Time allows events to be categorized. Because it is invisible, we have trouble defining it, but it is really the tool that nature has devised to show the continuum of existence. Professor Smollin may be correct in saying the future has not been mapped out. My theoretical ideas are what comes out of my brain when I pose the question of what time is. Whether or not it is relevant, only time will tell!

    • @empyrionin
      @empyrionin Před 2 lety

      There is a quantum leap between "time allows events to happen in sequence" and "time is the consciousness of the universe". One does not follow from the other.

    • @tekannon7803
      @tekannon7803 Před 2 lety

      @@empyrionin GGGGGGGGGGreat to hear from you. What I believe is that what we percieve as consciousness is in fact what the universe provides for all and everything to tune in to for its instructions per se on how to live or exist. Time is most likely the wheels and motor of consciousness. Nothing can move without time, not thoughts, hot material
      objects, not the progression of all things.

  • @CarlosRivera-wx3dv
    @CarlosRivera-wx3dv Před 2 lety

    This fine gentleman is a hero. Physics should listen to the man.

  • @dianabudzik7636
    @dianabudzik7636 Před 4 lety +1

    Lex-please ask a theoretical physicist, such as Lee Smolin, more interesting and in-depth physics questions-so we can learn much more about physics

  • @thugdick
    @thugdick Před měsícem

    Deep stuff. Loved the style of questioning..

  • @huydo8605
    @huydo8605 Před 4 lety +3

    Wonderful Lex! And thanks so much Prof Lee!
    Theoretical and Practical Approach at the same time, and let the Nature open the secret.
    Hope we, Homosapiens could pass the very now challenges peacefully, wisely...

  • @bartmawoussi4816
    @bartmawoussi4816 Před 4 lety +1

    I like Lee Smolin, but I subscribed because the intro by Lex totally reminds me of Rod Serling.

  • @magnushelliesen
    @magnushelliesen Před 4 lety +2

    0:52 What's the correct pronunciation of "Susskind"?

  • @ailblentyn
    @ailblentyn Před 2 lety +2

    I think when Smolin speaks of there being no “scientific method”, he has in mind an old dream that you could define an algorithm for scientific progress. And I think he’s right that that is impossible.

    • @nmarbletoe8210
      @nmarbletoe8210 Před rokem +1

      agree. There's no formula. When I entered grad school nobody gave me the Scientist's Creed. (although actually a Creed could be a good thing, just not an algorithm)

    • @mchammer1836
      @mchammer1836 Před 8 měsíci +1

      By this comment I can tell you agree that Lex did not get a definitive answer out of Lee as to why he doesn't think the scientific method exists. I wish he had pursued it more.

  • @edwardgarrity7087
    @edwardgarrity7087 Před 7 měsíci

    40:33 "Action at a distance" involves waves that transmit energy and information.
    Water: The water waves. Sound: The air molecules wave. EMF: The photons wave. Gravity: The Space-Time fabric waves.
    I can visualize "Action at a distance" as Holograms - a directed "Action at a distance". Photons can now be steered using the physics of waves to display images in midair, real holograms; no opaque background is needed. Watch "Holograms are real (and I just talked to one)", an updated report on hologram technology called "SolidLight", published by CNET on February, 12, 2023.

  • @timbob1145
    @timbob1145 Před 2 lety

    I love how this guy doesn't take anything as certain forever, even if it seems so as proven here and now, doesn't mean it won't change later. I also wonder if some of our 'constants' change depending on place in the universe, not just time. So much we don't know and many so called scientists ought to make sure they remember that every day.

  • @gravelyetigravelyeti4284

    great intrview

  • @faithful5361
    @faithful5361 Před 3 lety +3

    was hoping for discussion of Smolin's concept of cosmological natural selection

  • @SoulReflection2024
    @SoulReflection2024 Před 4 lety +1

    You are doing grate a lots of great jobs

  • @username-iz6el
    @username-iz6el Před 2 lety

    Listening to these podcasts is like a great book. Reading it just once and thinking you caught everything is not logical.

  • @viewer3091
    @viewer3091 Před 4 lety +1

    Lex has a nice humility about him.

  • @JustNow42
    @JustNow42 Před 7 měsíci +1

    Why does time enter in Einsteins equations and not relative time ( the speed of time relative to a reference ) this way it would feel more like a space coordinate, the C factor would disapear. Actually everything seems only to exists relative to somethings else, length, time, speed

  • @Alperic27
    @Alperic27 Před 3 lety

    Thank you.

  • @theaveragehunter4360
    @theaveragehunter4360 Před 4 lety +1

    Would love to se Ed Witten on the podcast!

  • @NICKROX247
    @NICKROX247 Před 3 lety

    lex reaction at 18:38 hahaha amazing

  • @andrewkelley7062
    @andrewkelley7062 Před 4 lety

    As I watch this one morning it brings an old question in my mind. Something that I can only describe as crystilazation. Is there some force arriving from a quantum level. That sort of makes one point in space the same as that which is around it. Like if you had a ton of sticks on a plane all formed in the shape of a plus all about a foot long. If there is one set of sticks in the shape of a v that will snap to a plus given a big enough plane? I mean it may not work like that but I have always wondered if it happens and under what conditions it would occur.

  • @josephsmith6777
    @josephsmith6777 Před 4 lety

    Language is by far the most important invention followed by writing and saving that writting then math or along w it