Truth: Energygraphy's Permanent Magnet Motor with a magnetic switch a2z
Vložit
- čas přidán 3. 10. 2023
- We're going to look at a perpetual magnetic motor that uses the effect of a magnetic switch, which apparently can switch off and on the magnetic field of a permanent magnet.
This magnetic switch is available for purchase in the stores and I am rebuilding the necessary constellation physically with two permanent magnets, to see exactly what happens.
The inspiration for this video comes from Energygraphy's great video
• .
Let's see how far we get with this principle.
--
#ywild - Věda a technologie
Short answer - No, this isn’t perpetual motion and the fact that this guy didn’t build it proves that it won’t work. The energy to turn the “magnetic switch” plus the friction in the joints is greater than the propulsive power stroke.
Hi Robert, thanks for your comment. Yes it is not able to work. I describe the reason for it in this video. Thx for watching 🙂
I also wanted to say that you really notice your effort in your video as you have just built something in real life, which I think is really cool, so please keep making informative videos like this.
LG Noah
and that's yours. Link the German channel in your channel info just like you linked your English channel in German. LG Noah
Hello Noah, thank you for your comment. I’m glad you like the video. I have already built similar devices without filming and always had the problem that they did not work for some inexplicable reason. If you have ever worked with neodymium magnets, then you have probably noticed that they are very difficult to work with. The repulsion and attraction makes the work challenging. Fine tuning is difficult. Simply because magnetic fields are invisible and the effects are difficult to estimate.
That's what brought me to the gravity model. 😉 Just sometimes I will build up things in the real world.
Thank you for Watching
Sweden calling.:)
lovely to see a new well done animation. I think your model of showing magnet's energy flow is very good. Easy to understand why many free energy magnetic motors have difficulty working.. But there are more models that you set that would work if... you have a flywheel. The Otto engine would never work if you didn't have the kinetic energy stored to make the engine rotate...
Why should everyone build a free energy motor without a flywheel???
Make over Do the right thing as we say in Sweden...
looking forward to the next animation…
would like to use your model to see energy flow with my magnetic motor.....:)
do you work with Cad, or just a hobby?
//Matthias
Hi Mattiask, glad to hear from you again. You are a big fan of fly wheels? Aren’t you? 😄
A flywheel by its self, it’s only a tool to give inertia a bigger influence and relatively reduce friction by adding mass.
I like flywheels too, but for the use of perpetual motion machine, they are not very helpful, I fear.
Thx for watching 🙂
@yWild
he has an interesting point flywheels are necessary to store momentum and cycle steps in the combustion process
The energy loss of a flywheel is measured with the heat released and forces down shaft. I think?
Hi schönes Video.
Wenn die schaltbaren Magneten von einem kleinen Motor geschaltet werden, welcher Wirkungsgrad wäre möglich? Es wäre schade, wenn man daraus ein Perpetuum mobile machen will. Geht eh nicht. Aber der Wirkungsgrad kleiner 1,wäre interessant
Hi Gkio, thx for your comment. Der Aufwand die Magnete zu verdrehen ist recht hoch. Es bleibt eine Anwendung die reichlich Energie verzehrt. Thx for watching 🙂
I have an idea that applies the same concept of a magnetic barrier that requires less force to utilize,thus leaving the system with access force and perpetuation, I can't post it here for before I patent it but I can send it to you directly under conditions of non disclosure so that you can animate it and test it with your gravity model test. My innovation achieves permanent imbalance.
Problem is the energy u need to crank the handle. Its more then you can win. Like in every machine of this kind. Its just impossible. Please dont feed the magnetic motor beleavers. Allmost all electric motors are based in magnets. So wie can call every magnetic motor a megnet motor. And we all know that this beasts are hungry
Hi Orgathm, thanks for your comment. I try to show why these devices are not able to work using my gravity model. Thx for watching 🙂
Молодец! Нужно изменить конструктив не много. Вместо железного поршня установить один из двух магнитов. Второй магнит сверху пусть так и вращается. Магниты не должны подходить вплотную, во избежания примагничивания.
my last coment on this subject, the magnet will lose their magnetic energy in the proportion of work produced, also if we need energy to make magnets to convert they energy in work................. i do prefer bateries
Hi Willy, thanks for your comment. Yes, the magnets will use the magnetic energy, but this will be an effect that takes very long. 🙂 thanks for watching.
come on - you need to use ONE pointed magnet (the magnet should be less in one pole) so when it comes closer to the other magnet it is drawn to, the opposite pool will push it away again, thus creating a perpetual push and push away.
Muito interessante seu conteúdo, ótima explicação, mas no entanto me surge uma grande duvida, muito investimento para provar que uma teoria não funciona sendo que com a configuração correta ela funciona perfeitamente, não em modo perpétuo porque isso não existe na nossa dimensão temporal, entretanto em modo continuo por um longo período funciona perfeitamente, acredito que você sabe disso!
Hi Jean, thx for your comment. Yes, some machines may work for a while if they have a very low friction. But in this case the motor does not do a step after starting because of the inoperable principle. My topic are the perpetual motion motors and the people believing in them.
Thx for watching 🙂
Before I finish watching this video, I would tell you that I have two of these mag-switches (for my workshop) and turning the mag-switch on takes a bit if energy to turn. It takes more energy to turn it off. I'll say, here, that I don't think you have a perpetual magnetic motor. I think the total energy put into the system will not be enough to equal the total energy put out. I'll post a reply to myself once I finish the video. :)
Excellent graphics. Excellent experiment, too. This is the Scientific Method demonstrated well. Good going, sir!
Hi Randall, thanks for your comment. Great to hear someone with experience with the magnetic switches. Unfortunately it’s independent of which turn, on or off, has more force to invest because there are both very important 🙂. Thx for watching
Thank you for a very thoughtful comment.
Let us measure the difference of energy for the on switch and off switch as a magnetic well or capacitance/inductance or similar to how a flywheel stores momentum...
@@yWildwhich units should we consider Ein - Eout = 0
Do you use Watts?
Thank you for another great video.
Law of conservation of energy: energy cannot be created or destroyed
ever heard of multiple cylinders ?
so in short the energy of the falling ball cannot have enough energy to rotate the magnets!
Magnetism is always a field with a North and South pole. There is no such thing as a monopole magnet or a magnetic switch.
Very nice animation
Hi Mraza, glad you like it. Thx for watching 😀
If you make it work on the same way as a solenoid engine, it'll work without any problems, just like solenoid engine
Hi Cen, thanks for your comment. If you have found a device which is working without any problems. It may be a fake. If there is no additional power inserted in the system, the movement will stop in a short period of time. 🙂 thanks for watching.
@@yWild saying that there is no additional power inserted into the system while talking about a permanent magnet based devices is literally saying that permanent magnets aren't real because they don't have a power source. The point of making a perpetual motion machine is to make a device that will be able to convert the type of energy it uses (magnet, spring) into a work, which is something that people don't seem to understand.
If you take an electric motor for example you can see that you need just a couple of magnets and a clever way of positioning them to harvest the energy from them. Will it be an electric magnet or permanent magnet doesn't matter since either of them produce a magnetic field. I hope that you understand my point.
Let's build a model rocket using 4 long non conductive rods attached to the sides? At the end of two roads a mag square magnet is attached. A electronical switch on the control panel inside the rocket will turn the magnet off and on using a timing gear at exact intervals as the rods move forward past the front of the ship ( locks in) and the magnet is turned on; thus thrusting; or pulling the space rocket forward ( lock off) as the two rods come back to its original position as a second set of rods move forward, and repeats same pull maneuver ? To overcome the gravitational pull of the earth; the rods will be able to angle upward and downward ; thus keeping the ship up?........................... Later people may even come with the gravity burst beam; and the continuous burst will keep the ship moving forward.... Hello.
I tried this design, it did not work, as the piston is coming up to the magnet its attraction and repulsion work against each other thus counter reacting any gain, and the magnets in the magnetic switch are hard to turn, much harder than any energy produced from the machine, so this machine does not work.
Hi JK, great to hear the confirmation of my own experimental experiences. Yes you are right, the power to invest is much more than the power output.
Thx for watching 🙂
dünyada mıknatısın yada mıknatısların kullanıldığı hiç bir araç yoktur ama ufolar uçan daireler bu projeyi kullanabilir
After how much time it's become failed due to its own heating 🤣🤣😂😂
Hi Anik, it’s immune against this scenario, because it does not even do the first step of running 🙂. Thx for watching
I lIke you, I like your videos: but this is not how you make a magswitch. You're missing like half the parts......
Hi Chaor, thx for your comment. Glad you like the videos. Really I haven’t got the principle right? I apologise if it is like you said. Actually I tried it out, as you can see in the video. If there are more hidden parts included, it is working without it even. 🤗 thx for watching
Teoria ca teoria. Practica te omoara! Vezi daca energia necesara pentru rotirea magnetilor nu depaseste energia produsa! ...
Like a Bosch
Hi Boggs, thanks for your comment. Indeed not 😄. Thx for watching
@@yWild I just tried to do a pun on the Bosch commercial we get here in Sweden 😀
Hi Boggs, I understood and we have got the same commercials 😄 I think. But the Bosch stuff is working for real 😉😄👍🏻
@@yWild German engineering at its best 😉😁
Btw... it seems u need a 3d printer 😂😅
Hi Orgathm, 😅 yes, you’re right I think.
Cette version je connais pas mais je posede une version différent pour produire là même chose de façon très efficace même une autre version encore
Use lubricant and it's become easier for sure 🤣😂😂😂🤣
Hi Anik, thanks for your comment. This time friction is not the most important topic 😉. Thx for watching
Newton's second law can help you. Do you know Newton's second law???
Hi World, thanks for your comment. If Newton’s laws would be respected, then all the people would not believe all this perpetual motion machine stuff in the Internet. But people are able to think out of these laws and are able to imagine that there is more. And because magnetic fields are invisible, I go the way to show them my gravity model. 🙂 thanks for watching.
@@yWild you did not understand!!! pay attention to Newton's second law 🤐 100 magnets with a force of 2 kilograms create a force on an inclined surface of 0.04 F=?
this is another BS. Turning force of switch is no egaul to repelling force of magnet this is fail attempt.
Hi Dalwin, thx for your comment. You’re right, that’s the reason why I do these videos. To many people believe in these devices. Feel free to watch a bit further 🙂. Thx for watching