The fact that Joe makes a claim, goes to fact check it with an article, then steps away from the whole conversation when he realizes he’ll contradict and prove himself wrong if he keeps going is enough for me not to trust what he says and take everything with a grain of salt Even if he didn’t do it on purpose, it still shows that his process of fact-checking is flawed and shouldn’t be trusted
If you ever get kidnapped and if you can access your phone tweet "BTS sucks", they'll find your location quicker than the FBI,CIA,MI6,Interpol,The KGB,Scotland Yard and the RCMP.
In so much of this video Adum sounds like a teacher, and I get it now. Every teacher I ever had sounded fucking exhausted, probably because they had to explain the same shit over and over to people who didn't want to hear it
I often worry about Adum when he sounds like this, because I can only imagine how much worse he gets angry and exhausted from people harassing him or him repeating himself. 😕
from the moment i saw adum analysing the behaviour of the kimba conspiracy theorists i wanted him to go against other groups in that style^^ because he didnt seem to realize how much of a widespread human/internet problem this kind of behaviour is (jumping to conclusions with conspiracies)
Idk I feel like he did a good job staying on the Topic at Hand he came to address And knew what he was talking about, Since hes against misinformation i doubt he would begin talking about other problems when this situation is what he KNOWS about. He doesnt wanna make politics/"serious" conspiracies a big thing in his life or channel and who would given the choice?
Sorry I may have misunderstood and took this the wrong way. But it's still good he didnt address more In my opinion. I think he knows how big the problem can bebut it's a whole mess and a lot to cover
Imagine having such strong opinions on something without doing your own research. But people don't really research anything, Adum. Did you research every "Joe Rogan Stan" you criticized or were they just a guy who wanted to argue about personal liberties, unjust laws and media attacks?
The fact that this video is titled this way kinda proves the point, I saw like two people in that one comment section that admitted that they watch Joe a lot, and a whole ton of people saying "I don't watch much of joe but I kinda wanna argue about the principles tbh" so when I see all of you leftists screaming "omg so many joe rogan stans" you really seem like a bunch of liars.
Portraying someone (mostly someone who is seen as "the enemy") as "all powerful but at the same time incompetent" is actually fascism 101 and is identified as one of the general properties of fascist ideology by Umberto Eco in his 1995 essay _Ur-Fascism_ - "by a continuous shifting of rhetorical focus, the enemies are at the same time too strong and too weak."
Considering that both leftists and rightists do that, don't think that's a good leg to stand on. I do think the people that use those manipulation tactics are pieces of shit, but they're in the media, so of course they're pieces of shit. Most of them are rich dickheads that have a hidden motive, or even multiple motives. Some of them just stoke chaos. It's stupid to see America so divided over " My party's color is red. " " My party's color is blue. " " Hey, now I hate you person I don't even know! " - it's like children.
@@Khornecussion says leftist, then talks about liberal electoralism. Maybe you should actually understand the definitions of the labels you apply to groups of people before talking about them lol.
@@Khornecussion The "both sides do it" ism is disingenuous. 1) The Democratic party is NOT a left wing party. Stop thinking that America is the only political place in the universe. Both major political parties in the US are to the right when examined on a scale of all 1st world countries. 2) The Democratic Party doesn't even represent MOST of the views of the American left, anyway. It's neoliberalism.
Never heard that saying in my life. Imagine telling anyone who is pro lgbtq+ that they’re so open minded their brain is falling out I.e too open minded. Where is the line when it comes to being too open minded, and who’s drawing that line?
@@superaddyb I’d say a pretty good place to put the line would be entertaining conspiracies that have been throughly debunked by peer-reviewed research.
@@alexanderfreeman3406 I would say that’s an awful idea, considering not all scientific discoveries have had peer reviews including the discovery of the double helix in dna. Einstein himself was not a fan of peer review. To follow such an idea would only create dogma and stifle free thought.
I was going to create an account to tell you to "go fuck yourself", but then I remembered that it would be kinda inconvenient, so here I am explaining my idea of an ironic joke. Have a good day
fascinating that a pharma giant has enough influence to *literally* stall the propagation of life-saving medicine patent to poor countries, but they can’t stop a podcast 🤔
those two things really have nothing to do with one another, a pharmaceutical company would always have more control over their product than some random piece of media.
Weird how a company that makes drugs has the power to control those drugs, but not the power to control a music company. Hmmm very weird... Also not a Joe Rogan Stan but also not a fucking retard. Lmao maybe put some thought into your damn comments.
What I love about this dude is he is totally comfortable with being proven wrong if he is wrong. We need more people to be intellectually honest like this.
I hate when people unnecessarily frame their criticisms with "I love you man, but...", "No offense but..." "Not hating here" "I used to enjoy your channel a lot but...". Makes everything sound more condescending and shady.
its more people dont want to be called a "Hater". You can only praise people or you hate them regardless of what they do. So they have to frame it so people like you dont think its "shady" rather than a fan who disagrees with 1 topic of someone they enjoy.
Shit, I do that myself some times. I find it's just hard to voice something that rubs you the wrong way over text without sounding too negative at times.
Honestly? I would rather them do that than just go straight to flaming. At least then it shows they thought about their rhetoric slightly. They're at least attempting to be polite. Better to just shut their gob, but ah well, at least they put forth their critique with a bit of kindness, rather than impudence or rudeness.
Adum himself did that, He is saying how he likes rogan and just disagrees with him on this one thing, then he went on a whole rant about how Rogan cant admit he is wrong because he is some meat head who lost his mind the past 2 years from becoming a boomer.
How could you expose joe rogan like this... He's actually our grandpa and we are following along because he doesn't have much time left, just let him have a good time...
Idk, it's pretty hard to recall specific instances of things that have reinforced your stance on something over years. I have a hard stance against Asian Idol culture, but it's a real pain in the ass to go and dig out my own conversations with people from years ago, or to find bits and specks of media that have been buried under the internet.
Just to add to my comment, using the Hillary Vs Trump debacle can illustrate it a tiny bit. I'm sure everybody remembers bits and pieces from that campaign, but when you try and look up information again years later most of it only covers the surface-level controversies. They'll mention x y and z, but leave out person A because it's only half-relevant. Then when you search for that person, it doesn't mention anything about what they've done anywhere.
Wow that whole thing with reading the article and then just stopping when its about to prove him wrong is literally indefensible. I really hope the Joe Rogan stand are still lurking because I wanna hear the justification for that.
@@WL1264 He stopped reading the sentence just before it said "Grocery Stores and Pharmacies". He was so close that he'd see the words after the words he was reading. Definitely dishonest, not just stupid.
@@NateCooper111 You are making that assumption off the framing of the clip. There wasnt some pause where Rogan clearly finishes reading the rest of the sentence in his head, he immediately started talking about Alberta and the Truckers so how can you be sure it was intended to be dishonest instead of just having a change in his train of thought that lead him to bring up how some of the mandates in Canada are being lifted. Also he didnt close the window, he wasnt the one who even pulled it up. That is Jamies Job and the reason the meme exists.
@@DeezNutz-lr8xn So, On Joe Rogan's podcast, its the intern (/s) who dictates what's shown and what isnt? I've seen multiple JRE podcasts where Jamie drops the window and Joe immediately says "Wait wait, bring that back up."
28:06 To be fair on the flip side, I stopped listening to Joe Rogan since two years ago when he boomer-brained himself on vaccines and hearing that Adum has also noticed that he’s being intellectually dishonest makes me feel more certain that I haven’t gone crazy.
There's clips out there where Joe Rogan pretty clearly ignores facts after his boy Jamie pulls them up. He either doesn't address the information that contradicts his view, says they're an unreliable source because of some conspiracy, or he's got a "buddy of mine" whose very... how should I put this? "Unique" case confirms his biased belief
@@somethingsomething8511 I don't regularly listen to him but from what I understand he is a cooties vaxx skeptic...maybe? He has guest on that question the official narrative of cooties, to many people that makes him anti vaxx.
@@iamthewizardwhoknocks2845 the thing that makes him anti vaxx isn't questioning something. He just has "buddies" who all had strokes after taking the vaccine and invites conspiracy theorists who talk about how the vaccine will kill you
So I'm not from North America and therefore I hadn't really heard much about Joe Rogan but when I was watching this, I understand now what this whole thing is about. And that clip with him changing topics like that was unintentionally hilarious.
@R Why would I be talking about you in the third person? When I said "he" I was talking about Rogan. Nobody addresses you and means you when they say "he has no clue how English works". Apparently you don't have much life experience regarding conversations.
Ngl it's embarrassing that someone like Joe who for years said not to trust the msm fell for the fabricated Adele trans outrage story considering that he may have a team that reviews his sources I think he's starting to become more old mentally
About Tim Pool, I still don't get how anyone with a brain still argues that Tim doesn't appeal to the right, and in a lot of ways appeals to the far right Yes the dude himself claims he's a centrist, and he very well be one, but his whole channel is centered around click baiting right wingers with very anti-left titles, he never posts anything that criticises the right (I know because I used to watch his stuff a lot) Why can't these people just accept the fact that maybe, just maybe Tim found a gold mine (rage baiting right wingers) and is mining it to the last ore?
And even though Tim appeals to the right with his content, he still gets a lot of shit from his audience for "not being right wing enough" which is evidence that his audience contains a lot of far right dummies (yes all far right and far left people are dummies, anyone who is an extremist is a dumbass)
I agree, I'm left-leaning and used to watch his stuff back in 2016, I actually believe he used to align more with moderate left with strong narratives about the silent majority, then for some reason or another made a right wing switch to very different subject matter and political ideas and did both at the same time, weeeird vibes
@@De_La_Evo I don't know how he was in 2016, I watched him throughout 2019 and his videos were pretty obviously directed at a right wing audience And as I said, he himself may not be right wing, but he makes content dedicated to rage baiting the right
He’s definitely been critical of the right, but you are correct about the clickbait titles. While I’m sure the money plays a role, you can still see him transition from a Bernie bro to a trump liberal in real time if you follow him I think people are too quick to play this off as liberals willfully joining far right. When the mainstream panders to the far left, the center feels politically homeless. The flip side is just as true historically
Well he talks to people who do know their shit pretty consistently. Constantly relying on academics is cool and good until academics is full of ideologically motivated nonsense.
@@makeitthrough_ wow just group every one who likes the sport of martial arts to be a douche bag. Irony in this is the douchy attitude and thinking you have. Look in the mirror before judging others
Joe Rogan is 100% still on Spotify and there's multiple links on his page with "Learn about COVID-19" linking to some actual reputable sources, which I think is pretty funny.
At what point between being on a show about eating insects and doing roids did Rogan gain enlightenment? I've never listened to what he's had to say, and I literally couldn't care less.
@@somethingsomething8511 The Venn diagram of whatever I do in my life and whatever Rogan does do not in any way intersect. I feel the same about him as he feels about me: nothing.
I think it was the point where he started swearing at an expert on chimps when she told him that what he thought was a new species of chimp wasn't actually a new species of chimp. He was so offended he wouldn't let her finish a single sentence, and after she left he claimed she was an example of somebody who thought they knew everything but was completely wrong.
My favorite part of this highlight was watching it for 5 minutes, accidentally dozing off, then waking up to a blaring ad that's just an entire 44-minute episode of a BlazeTV show (Chad Prather?) complaining about woke-ism or something? I skipped it but damn, it's wild that that's a thing that can happen.
Joe Rogan's friend's reaction to the vaccine sounds like a reaction to the needle, not the vaccine itself. I am needle phobic and sometimes get bad reactions just like that, sometimes don't. I got the J&J vaccine first and then a booster, so I've only gotten two shots. The first shot I had a bad reaction and was literally lying on the floor for like 15 minutes before my blood pressure got up high enough to walk out to my car. I've had reactions like that before, so I knew exactly what it was and wasn't scared by it. If I HADN'T had a reaction like that in the past, I can see myself panicking, making it worse, and being taken to the hospital to make sure it wasn't a reaction to the vaccine. Booster shot was completely fine. Vasovagal reactions are weird.
19:55 Adam really hits the nail on the head here every conspiracy theory I see it’s a mix of the evil people being all powerful but Incompetent at the same Time. But like you can’t have it both ways
@@emcee9899 true but what Adam is saying is a lot of those conspiracies have the elite people being all knowing, all powerful, and in total control. While at the same time making dumb and incompetent mistakes that blow their cover. Which doesn’t make sense to me if they’re supposedly all knowing and all powerful
@@emcee9899 true but what I think Adam is saying is that conspiracy theories paint these people as such. Which doesn’t make sense once they claim they’re making incompetent errors along the way
@@lampini yes. They can't be all- powerful and all-knowing. But it is not unbelievable that evil people are in power doing horrible things, and wanting to do even worse things, but are unable to make those things happen because they are not intelligent.
The Reverse-Strawman: Simplifying your own side’s argument to the point that it’s not the same argument. It’s a super manipulative pivot that these stans love to use.
Sounds pretty similar to the Motte and Bailey. 1) Say something outrageous. 2) Receive criticism. 3) Re-state your position as something bland and agreeable, completely removing your original intent in the process.
I hate the way too common debate tactic of someone making their opponent prove they are not wrong. I can make a claim with no evidence, then my opponent makes a claim; all I have to do is say "how do you know that?" and I instantly have the upper hand. The burden of evidence is now on them and I don't have to explain myself until much later, if at all. Deflection like this is popular because it gives bad debaters that know they have flimsy arguments an out by making their opponent do all the work while acting holier than thou at the same time.
@@somethingsomething8511 This misconception is why people are easy to fool with Gish Gallop tactics, if you just let people make claims without evidence it takes disproportionately more time and effort to disprove something than it does to present any support for a claim. The Other Jared is making a fair statement, only if your debate opponent is actually acting in good faith, but that is often not the case. As soon as you cave to those tactics you've lost because the conspiratorial idiots have an endless supply of baseless claims they can weight you down with.
@@ifeeltiredsleepy If they demand evidence, provide it, then demand your own. If they don't, mock them endlessly for not providing it. This guy is acting like it's some trap when it's the easiest tactic to thwart.
@@somethingsomething8511your reading comprehension could use some work. They literally explained how it ISN'T easy to just provide evidence. I'll explain it AGAIN for you. A person says literally anything, and then tells you to prove them wrong. Now it's YOUR job to obtain the evidence, compile it, and come back with all of the information you need to prove them wrong, which takes time. It takes a few seconds to say some ridiculous misinformation, but hours, days, or even years to be able to explain why the information is inaccurate. Not to mention the person who made the statement often can't even understand HOW the information you gave them proves them wrong (there's a term for that, it's called the Dunning Kruger effect).
@@GenesisTheKitty your understanding of debate is hilariously simple minded. You are not their to convince the other person of anything, you're their convince the people who read it after the fact. The more you're able to readily access information or point to the location of the data the more credible your argument becomes to third parties.
What I'd be curious about is how often commenters actually comment on any given channel. I don't think I've written a single comment on any of Adam's or this channels videos before (might be wrong), as I don't feel the need to comment on most of the things I watch unless something in the video, good or bad, motivated me enough to leave my thoughts. That being said I've probably watched dozens of hours of YMS, so it's not like I'm not a regular viewer.
Also gotta love the absolute hypocracy of someone rehashing the "Adum is a zoophile" BS and telling him to "do his research," only to - when I linked the video that explicitly stated they were wrong - go "well, I'm not watching an hour long video justifying zoophelia," meaning they A) gave the video equivalent of the "too long, didn't read" excuse (saying you're too cool for... *reading* doesn't make you look "based" it makes you look like a dispshit), and B) were not willing to do the most basic of research by WATCHING THE VIDEO RESPONDING TO THE ACCUSATION. You don't get to throw a pissy fit when others "don't do their research" only to do the same damn thing. In my case, you have even LESS of an excuse because the resources were HANDED TO YOU. It's so frustrating to deal with people like this.
@SuperJumpChump My entire comment was about how the Zoophelia accusations are FALSE. THERE IS NO "JUSTIFICATION." People strawman him as saying "Zoophelia is not an issue" when that's NOT what he actually said. Here, here's the link to the video. Come to your own conclusions. czcams.com/video/WDxthsz9G7s/video.html
@kar12894 *A)* Yes, I misspelled hypocricy; however, I don't see how a typo suddenly throws my ENTIRE comment out the window. Not to mention, trying to spin "misspelled a word" as equivalent to "cannot read / comprehend language in and of itself" is laughable. *B)* Instead of actually responding to **what I said** I'm simply called a "sensitive dumbfuck." I'm not insulted, I threw out insults in my original comment. HOWEVER, insults are not a REPLACEMENT for an argument. *C)* I can write all I want online because I'm an ADULT who doesn't need mommy's permission. Projection, perhaps? 🙃
Wish there were more people out there being able to question themselves, like Adum! How will we ever learn and evolve if we're just repeating each other's bullshit instead of asking questions
So, if you don’t agree with the Rogan stans, you need to do your own research. If you do agree, then you’ve done enough research. Interesting how that works
2:12 I wasn't really surprised about it. Considering YMS was critical of the Santa Inc. trailer, I feel like that attracted some people from the "anti-woke crowd" which includes Joe Rogan stans. So people who aren't familiar with your content (hence not knowing you had tendinitis or that you were more on the left) assumed you were just against "wokeness" or PC culture from that one video.
i mean... adum is moderately anti woke. What the more extreme anti wokes will probably get triggered by is that he's pretty laxed with most of his opinions on political stuff and can make fun of both sides when he feels like it.
@@JustJack6719 I'd argue that's what he meant by anti-woke, but you never know. My thing is like... you can like a person but still think they said some dumb shit? You can be critical of the people and stuff you like.
@@JustJack6719 i cant wait til conservatives start calling trump a "superficial expression" of their ideology. imagine having corporate backing and shaking it off as inauthentic. its like saying you have no power as all institutional power coalesces behind you.
I’m really glad I’m not the only one who has noticed these accounts that have a default profile pic, usually are just the persons actual name as the username, and also very old accounts with no videos on them and very little in terms of comment history, and what little comment history that exists is just shit talking the channel they’re comment on. Seriously, who the fuck are these people and why are they everywhere?
I always wondered why they kept the downvote button in comments but that makes a lot of sense to have a metric for sorting comments. Gonna start reusing it. Thanks for the tip!
I think people see two creators they like disagreeing on something and low-key see it like mom and dad arguing. Especially if they share a chunk of community. In a world with customizable news feeds, two creators you watch disagreeing can break the sense of homogeny; which shouldn't be as jarring as it appears to be to these people.
I love it deep down. I like YMS and watch the occasional Rogan episode. It’s nice to hear YMS talk about the things that annoy me about Rogan. It’s like when Adam says around 48:00 to hear every point and find the truth.
@@GangsterFrankensteinComputer Pretty sure it didn't seeing as how that was at the start of the pandemic and the message was that wearing a mask does not prevent you from catching it (which is still true) and they later realised that wearing a mask is still helpful because even though it doesn't stop you from catching it, it hinders you from spreading it.
@@GangsterFrankensteinComputer Not what I was saying. It was a novel virus, so the efficacy of various protective equipment wasn't fully known and they informed the public when it was known that the virus could pass through the mask.
That's maybe half true if you squint. The man has wackos on his show, usually admits when he's proven wrong, and also has very credible people of all sorts on his show. He's literally just some dude, not an expert in anything, who talks to various experts sometimes.
>They say it's and Alex Jones type conspiracy theory, so I think that's maybe a critical post? 7:30 There's considerable crossover between Alex Jones and Joe Rogan's fanbase.
You hit the nail pointing out the obvious clickbait that I can't believe people take seriously. It's hilarious to me when I see articles titled "joe rogan says ____." I like his podcast but I don't think the validity of ones opinion is directly linked to the popularity of their content.
I would agree with you about Joe Rogan he does think he knows more than the Doctors about vaccines and masks he has even had guests say to him I don’t know more than the Doctors. Joe does seem to think he know more about things than even the experts sometimes when most the information he gets is second hand just like everyone else
On the point about how to tell how long someone has been watching the channel by looking at how many comments they've made and how long they've been subscribed, it should be pointed out that people can have a lot of different accounts on CZcams, or have just made a new account, and their statistics aren't necessarily going to be an accurate representation to how much exposure they have had to your channel. For instance, I am not even subscribed to this channel or YMS on this account, but I am on other accounts and have been watching YMS for, idk, 10 years at this point.
Sure, but having multiple accounts that you regularly use probably isn't common. If anything, having one main "watch" account that you use to comment on stuff seems to be the norm.
I was talking to my friend the other day about antivax and the mandates. I thought she was pro, but she said she was anti, and referred to "I believe in freedom of choice". Now she just stopped talking to me. IDK if she's mad at me or not because of my reply, but I don't want to ruin my friendship with her. Adumbuddies what do? My reply: While I agree freedom of choice is important, in this instance that choice impact's other's right to life. Another way of looking at it is people can't choose to be infected by COVID or not, but they can choose how to limit its spread, evolution and severity.
Ask your friend if they think it's tyranny that the law forces them to wear seat belts. If they say yes, they've probably already gone off the deep end. If they're not sure, remind them that getting vaccinated not only protects them, but also the people they come in contact with as the amount of time it remains in their system is going to be shorter, as will the amount of time they can spread it. The last thing anyone wants is to learn they accidentally killed somebody by giving Covid to somebody who was vulnerable.
@@GangsterFrankensteinComputer What a bizarre comment. Do you think these lies are hard to disprove? It is not easy to avoid getting it in the slightest, it does not spread anything like AIDS (the simple fact you tried to compare the two tells me you have no idea how either of them spread), and PPE has not been normalised. A lot of places, especially in the US (and soon to be Canada) are lifting PPE restrictions and next to nobody wears masks in those areas. Finally you're going to have to explain how being pro-vax makes somebody a crypto fascist.
@@GangsterFrankensteinComputer " If you wear proper PPE and take precautions you can't get covid. " Well that's an absolute statement if I ever saw one... and a very misinformed one at that, evidence by the fact that you think that "If you don't come into contact with anyone with covid you can't catch covid.", another categorically false statement. COVID-19 can live on dry surfaces for up to three days, which means something as simple as handling money can theoretically get you sick. So unless you retort by saying "I ONLY pay with my credit card and/or online only", then you've already put yourself at risk. Also, if you work with the public, such as- oh I don't know- a medical facility maybe, then you are coming in contact with hundreds of strangers, some of which could have COVID and you just don't know it, so to just say 'Avoid people with the disease' is just... not a realistic answer? Based on your logic, the ONLY way to to avoid COVID is to work from home, order everything online and have it all be delivered to your doorstep, and otherwise never take a step outside of your home ever; and based on facts, those packages would have to be delivered by exclusively fully vaccinated individuals so your pizza delivery food doesn't come with a free side of COVID.
@@GangsterFrankensteinComputer That's a straight up lie. Covid does not spread through close physical contact, it spreads through respiratory droplets. I doubted that you were telling the truth about where you worked, but now that you're lying (or incredibly ignorant) about how Covid travels, I know for a fact you don't work in "unspecified medical facility/vaccination centre". Somebody could sneeze on a parcel, and if you received that parcel two days later you can catch Covid.
I was on Reddit last night, I saw a post in /AskReddit wherein a JR fan wanted to know what would be a reason to dislike JR. I commented, mentioning his eagerness to spread misinformation and talk out of his ass. I then get bombarded with, I shit you not, the same comments Adum is mentioning. "Oh he apologized!" or "Oh he isn't perfect! I'd like to see you have [X amount] of hours of conversation and make less errors than him!"
If you're the kind of person who cares about honesty, it's actually very easy to talk without spouting nothing but misinformation. Joe has a podcast to run, he's an entertainer not an educator, and he has no concern with being an honest entertainer. And of course his fans can't comprehend this lol
A constantly shifting rhetoric about the enemy being both overwhelmingly strong and pathetically weak isn't a new thing and is a staple of a specific political phenomenon called *drumroll please*..... FASCISM.
So happy you're talking about Rogan and the politics surrounding it. Not nearly enough people talk about this kind of stuff!! Can barely find anything about it anywhere. Phew
He has to talk about it because joe rogan stans have been coming at him lol. It seems you can't disagree with that moron without a lot of his fanbase coming to his defense.
@@chrisg6679 lol why even get started with it in the first place? Then upload a video. He made absolutely zero points that haven't been made by the billions of other posts about this stupid sht. And the only criticism I had on his last video was things like him uploading a clip, then cutting out the part where Rogan apologized and admitted he was wrong. Then saying Rogan says "vaccines are bad". Have literally never heard that. Makes Adam look like a dishonest person. And of course there were fans "defending him" hahaha. That's literally what people do for the people they watch and listen to. Including Adam's fans. During things like the Kimba stuff. People had to disable comments and sht bc Adam's viewers were flooding their videos. Or people going after Derek Savage over the cool cat sht, etc etc. It's what people do And I'm definitely not a "Rogan fan". I disagree with a huge amount of stuff he says. Just don't be dishonest about the way you go after him
@@ocd9033 if you don't like his opinion why are you watching his youtube video that clearly lists what he is going to talk about. Maybe your ocd is you spread your opinion that nobody asked for as well and like to be annoying.
@@chrisg6679 Yeah bc if you don't like someone's opinion on something you shouldn't listen to anything they have to say. What a loser mindset you have. And I have zero problems with his opinion. I actually agree with some his points on this subject. Just don't like the flat out false info. And if you didn't like my opinion, why did you reply? Take your own advice if you're gonna give it. Now buzz off lmao
@@ocd9033 chris is totally right, we should stop expressing opinions on things entirely and remain in the safety and agreement of our echo chambers :^)))
I hate when people refuse to admit when they're wrong, or they get the sense that they're "losing" a discussion and so they lie just to "win", ugh, so annoying. Impossible to have a normal convo with some people, it's their ego above everything for them. I deal with someone like that all the time so it's therapeutic to hear Adum rant about it lol
19:52 See Umberto Eco's "Ur-Fascism" This is one of the defining features of the fascist mindset. Their 'enemy' is both so WEAK as to be beneath contempt; but also so STRONG as to automatically excuse any obviously horrific actions the fascists might 'need' to take to oppose them.
@@PointsofData it is a built in element of fascist ideology and has been present in every fascist government to exist. I'm sorry but I do not hold this contradictory belief, so maybe it reflects upon the people you associate with, or the beliefs you hold that you believe it is "human nature" to have fascists tendencies. perhaps you've been so conditioned by the people around you, that you see any use of the word fascism as sensationalism but ur-fascism is THE text for intellectually understanding the beliefs of the movement. I'm sorry it makes you uncomfortable but fact does not care about your feelings.
@@PointsofData we're all calm here dude chill ahahaha fascism isn't necessarily the solemn military dude in some WW2 movie , also Eco is quite the Chad when it comes to human behavioral patterns... "Just human behavior" doesn't contraddict Eco's observation... Interesting read that's all
"I actively seek out opposing views" as any intellectually-honest individual would. Remember when Joe would have flat-earthers and shit on the show and he'd just spend like an hour and a half grilling them like he's been starving for weeks? Good fucking times, man.
The risk for myocarditis is extremely low. Also if you aren't putting a lot of strain on that heart one week after the shot, like your doctor will tell you, it's extremely likely to heal without any lasting damage. As far as side effects of medicine go, the COVID vaccine is one of the safest things out there.
@@tonypepperoni3679 quit your bullshit. The myocarditis numbers are so low they would never have been discovered if we hadn't vaccinated hundreds of millions of people in a short amount of time. It's likely that most vaccines have similar side effects, as they are an overreaction of your immune system. Also the COVID vaccines are more effective by light years than vaccines against the flu, also safer. Two years ago we thought we would be lucky if we'd get something more than 50% effectiveness in such a short time frame. The mRNA COVID vaccines are 95% effective against the strain they were designed for.
It's fairly safe and effective, and worth it from a cost/benefit analysis but I do think it's inaccurate to say "it's one of the safest things out there". Compared to most vaccines given to children the safety profile is a bit worse and the efficacy profile is much worse. Doesn't mean you shouldn't get it, but we should be honest about such things. If you get the Measles vaccine, you are not going to catch and die of measles, if you get the covid vaccine you can still catch and die of covid but it's way less likely.
The fact that Joe makes a claim, goes to fact check it with an article, then steps away from the whole conversation when he realizes he’ll contradict and prove himself wrong if he keeps going is enough for me not to trust what he says and take everything with a grain of salt
Even if he didn’t do it on purpose, it still shows that his process of fact-checking is flawed and shouldn’t be trusted
I swear, there's people who just search pandemic keywords all day and rage in the comments section. They're more dedicated than BTS stans
If you ever get kidnapped and if you can access your phone tweet "BTS sucks", they'll find your location quicker than the FBI,CIA,MI6,Interpol,The KGB,Scotland Yard and the RCMP.
@Byronic Fate discord and its consequences has been a disaster for the internet
@@Chelaxim On god, they are so powerful lol
Spot. On.
For once i saw something worse than BTS stans
In so much of this video Adum sounds like a teacher, and I get it now. Every teacher I ever had sounded fucking exhausted, probably because they had to explain the same shit over and over to people who didn't want to hear it
I often worry about Adum when he sounds like this, because I can only imagine how much worse he gets angry and exhausted from people harassing him or him repeating himself. 😕
Adum. Fk them all. Keep doing your thing.
I respect Adam, but he needs to learn when to ignore, and when to make a statement. You can’t control other people, but you can control yourself.
Exactly
Pfizer has Adum in their back pocket, and Scar has Pfizer in his back pocket.
Adum has Scar in his back pocket if you know what I mean ;)
#FollowThePurring
...and scar has adum in his back
"I got a laptop in my back pocket" -Slim 'Rap God' Shady
And they're all in the back pocket of Lana Wazowski controlling us all inside the Matrix.
from the moment i saw adum analysing the behaviour of the kimba conspiracy theorists i wanted him to go against other groups in that style^^ because he didnt seem to realize how much of a widespread human/internet problem this kind of behaviour is (jumping to conclusions with conspiracies)
Idk I feel like he did a good job staying on the Topic at Hand he came to address And knew what he was talking about, Since hes against misinformation i doubt he would begin talking about other problems when this situation is what he KNOWS about. He doesnt wanna make politics/"serious" conspiracies a big thing in his life or channel and who would given the choice?
Sorry I may have misunderstood and took this the wrong way. But it's still good he didnt address more In my opinion. I think he knows how big the problem can bebut it's a whole mess and a lot to cover
Imagine having such strong opinions on something without doing your own research.
But people don't really research anything, Adum. Did you research every "Joe Rogan Stan" you criticized or were they just a guy who wanted to argue about personal liberties, unjust laws and media attacks?
The fact that this video is titled this way kinda proves the point, I saw like two people in that one comment section that admitted that they watch Joe a lot, and a whole ton of people saying "I don't watch much of joe but I kinda wanna argue about the principles tbh" so when I see all of you leftists screaming "omg so many joe rogan stans" you really seem like a bunch of liars.
Next conspiracy theorist group is people against animal fucking
Portraying someone (mostly someone who is seen as "the enemy") as "all powerful but at the same time incompetent" is actually fascism 101 and is identified as one of the general properties of fascist ideology by Umberto Eco in his 1995 essay _Ur-Fascism_ - "by a continuous shifting of rhetorical focus, the enemies are at the same time too strong and too weak."
This is something that happened with a lot of talking points. So where is the source beyond the mainstream media's factors into it.
Considering that both leftists and rightists do that, don't think that's a good leg to stand on. I do think the people that use those manipulation tactics are pieces of shit, but they're in the media, so of course they're pieces of shit. Most of them are rich dickheads that have a hidden motive, or even multiple motives. Some of them just stoke chaos. It's stupid to see America so divided over " My party's color is red. " " My party's color is blue. " " Hey, now I hate you person I don't even know! " - it's like children.
@@Khornecussion Leftists aren't democrats ffs The Democrat Party in the USA is a neoliberal party, neoliberalism is not leftist nor is liberalism
@@Khornecussion says leftist, then talks about liberal electoralism. Maybe you should actually understand the definitions of the labels you apply to groups of people before talking about them lol.
@@Khornecussion
The "both sides do it" ism is disingenuous.
1) The Democratic party is NOT a left wing party. Stop thinking that America is the only political place in the universe. Both major political parties in the US are to the right when examined on a scale of all 1st world countries.
2) The Democratic Party doesn't even represent MOST of the views of the American left, anyway. It's neoliberalism.
Don't have anything massively against Joe Rogen, but he does seem to embody the saying: keep your mind open, but not so much your brain falls out.
I think Rogan has used psychedelics a little too often for a little too long.
You can always entertain an idea without accepting it as reality
Never heard that saying in my life. Imagine telling anyone who is pro lgbtq+ that they’re so open minded their brain is falling out I.e too open minded. Where is the line when it comes to being too open minded, and who’s drawing that line?
@@superaddyb I’d say a pretty good place to put the line would be entertaining conspiracies that have been throughly debunked by peer-reviewed research.
@@alexanderfreeman3406 I would say that’s an awful idea, considering not all scientific discoveries have had peer reviews including the discovery of the double helix in dna. Einstein himself was not a fan of peer review. To follow such an idea would only create dogma and stifle free thought.
Imagine creating an account just to comment on a video because you got triggered.
@@grimlocke6988 both exist. The bots embolden the butthurt stans
I was going to create an account to tell you to "go fuck yourself", but then I remembered that it would be kinda inconvenient, so here I am explaining my idea of an ironic joke. Have a good day
well to be fair it is youtube account. it pure havoc and stress to make one.
@@kar12894 Tell me you and 3 other people didn't get to 3:15 in the video without telling me anything.
@@kar12894 You didn't even watch the video dude...
So you mean to tell me JRE stands for "Joe Rogan Experience" and not "Java Runtime Environment"?!?!?!?!?
fascinating that a pharma giant has enough influence to *literally* stall the propagation of life-saving medicine patent to poor countries, but they can’t stop a podcast 🤔
I feel like that in and of itself shows what a dreamland these people are living in.
They can take our medicine but they can't take our voices man! What if red meant go and green meant stop?
those two things really have nothing to do with one another, a pharmaceutical company would always have more control over their product than some random piece of media.
Weird how a company that makes drugs has the power to control those drugs, but not the power to control a music company. Hmmm very weird...
Also not a Joe Rogan Stan but also not a fucking retard. Lmao maybe put some thought into your damn comments.
if you live in those poor countries like me, you know they can, and they would
What I love about this dude is he is totally comfortable with being proven wrong if he is wrong. We need more people to be intellectually honest like this.
Really? He seemed to throw a pretty big fit when people told him he shouldn’t fuck his dog!
Because that's a stupid fucking thing to say to a furry.
@@superjumpchump7182 Me when I actively misinterpret something
@@roundabout468 Oh no the furry defense squad is here
@@superjumpchump7182 But throwing a fit at someone telling someone off like that isn't the same thing as admitting when you're wrong.
I hate when people unnecessarily frame their criticisms with "I love you man, but...", "No offense but..." "Not hating here" "I used to enjoy your channel a lot but...". Makes everything sound more condescending and shady.
its more people dont want to be called a "Hater". You can only praise people or you hate them regardless of what they do. So they have to frame it so people like you dont think its "shady" rather than a fan who disagrees with 1 topic of someone they enjoy.
Shit, I do that myself some times. I find it's just hard to voice something that rubs you the wrong way over text without sounding too negative at times.
"I love your man butt" "no offense, butt."
Honestly? I would rather them do that than just go straight to flaming. At least then it shows they thought about their rhetoric slightly. They're at least attempting to be polite. Better to just shut their gob, but ah well, at least they put forth their critique with a bit of kindness, rather than impudence or rudeness.
Adum himself did that, He is saying how he likes rogan and just disagrees with him on this one thing, then he went on a whole rant about how Rogan cant admit he is wrong because he is some meat head who lost his mind the past 2 years from becoming a boomer.
Adum's ability to sum up complex topics like this off the cuff just blows me away. Fucking awesome highlight.
Adam should unironically make documentaries about topics. They'd be great.
@@HOTD108_ omg that would be great! He's so thorough and unbiased! Would be a breath of fresh air to see info made by someone with an open mind!
@@HOTD108_ Kimba was basically a documentary
I LUV -DISNEY- ADUM SO MUCH!
How could you expose joe rogan like this... He's actually our grandpa and we are following along because he doesn't have much time left, just let him have a good time...
Lmao
"Do your own research" = "I will not, to any degree, clarify my position"
could be, or "the clarification is right infront of your face"
Idk, it's pretty hard to recall specific instances of things that have reinforced your stance on something over years. I have a hard stance against Asian Idol culture, but it's a real pain in the ass to go and dig out my own conversations with people from years ago, or to find bits and specks of media that have been buried under the internet.
Just to add to my comment, using the Hillary Vs Trump debacle can illustrate it a tiny bit. I'm sure everybody remembers bits and pieces from that campaign, but when you try and look up information again years later most of it only covers the surface-level controversies. They'll mention x y and z, but leave out person A because it's only half-relevant. Then when you search for that person, it doesn't mention anything about what they've done anywhere.
"Do your own research!" = "I certainly didn't do any research but reading bad memes on Facebook"
@@4203105 ye I'm sure bro
58:24 i didnt expect adum to PERFECTLY start describing flatearthers
The earth IS flat and one day people around the globe will rise up and realize the truth
@@cameron2069 the Earth is a sphere and one day people around the disc will rise up and realize the truth
@@cameron2069 “people around the globe…” congratulations, you played yourself
@@rexventura4603 that's the joke
@@eragonship4929 I like going for low hanging fruit, and I just wanted an excuse to use the punchline.
Wow that whole thing with reading the article and then just stopping when its about to prove him wrong is literally indefensible. I really hope the Joe Rogan stand are still lurking because I wanna hear the justification for that.
It just seemed he didn't read the whole thing. Stupid but not dishonest.
@@WL1264 He stopped reading the sentence just before it said "Grocery Stores and Pharmacies". He was so close that he'd see the words after the words he was reading. Definitely dishonest, not just stupid.
@@WL1264 he immediately switched topics and closed the window before he read that part out loud. He definitely was being dishonest
@@NateCooper111 You are making that assumption off the framing of the clip. There wasnt some pause where Rogan clearly finishes reading the rest of the sentence in his head, he immediately started talking about Alberta and the Truckers so how can you be sure it was intended to be dishonest instead of just having a change in his train of thought that lead him to bring up how some of the mandates in Canada are being lifted.
Also he didnt close the window, he wasnt the one who even pulled it up. That is Jamies Job and the reason the meme exists.
@@DeezNutz-lr8xn So, On Joe Rogan's podcast, its the intern (/s) who dictates what's shown and what isnt?
I've seen multiple JRE podcasts where Jamie drops the window and Joe immediately says "Wait wait, bring that back up."
28:06 To be fair on the flip side, I stopped listening to Joe Rogan since two years ago when he boomer-brained himself on vaccines and hearing that Adum has also noticed that he’s being intellectually dishonest makes me feel more certain that I haven’t gone crazy.
There's clips out there where Joe Rogan pretty clearly ignores facts after his boy Jamie pulls them up. He either doesn't address the information that contradicts his view, says they're an unreliable source because of some conspiracy, or he's got a "buddy of mine" whose very... how should I put this? "Unique" case confirms his biased belief
May I ask what Joe Rogan's opinion on vaccines is?
@@somethingsomething8511 I don't regularly listen to him but from what I understand he is a cooties vaxx skeptic...maybe?
He has guest on that question the official narrative of cooties, to many people that makes him anti vaxx.
@@iamthewizardwhoknocks2845 the thing that makes him anti vaxx isn't questioning something. He just has "buddies" who all had strokes after taking the vaccine and invites conspiracy theorists who talk about how the vaccine will kill you
@@somethingsomething8511 Joe has stated that if you're healthy and keep in shape, that he recommends you do not get vaccinated.
So I'm not from North America and therefore I hadn't really heard much about Joe Rogan but when I was watching this, I understand now what this whole thing is about. And that clip with him changing topics like that was unintentionally hilarious.
As someone who doesn’t comment often, I’ll leave one now. Rogan has been quite boomer-ish lately
@R He has no life experience regarding the efficacy of vaccines.
@R Why would I be talking about you in the third person? When I said "he" I was talking about Rogan. Nobody addresses you and means you when they say "he has no clue how English works".
Apparently you don't have much life experience regarding conversations.
@R okay boomer
Ngl it's embarrassing that someone like Joe who for years said not to trust the msm fell for the fabricated Adele trans outrage story considering that he may have a team that reviews his sources I think he's starting to become more old mentally
I meant senile
Abandon all hope ye who enter this comments section.
Nah, I paid her 50 bucks already, Imma stay for the dance.
I’m not as mad at Rogan as I am at the millions of people who take his opinions and treat them as if they’re infallible law.
yessss finally someone else said it haha
Imagine being mad at the Fear Factor guy because the internet told you to...
Why are you even mad at him tf lmao
@@caleviwin I guess mad isn’t the right word. Maybe annoyed?
@@OJsLeftGlove Kinda glib, dontchya think?
A lot of conspiracy theorists give people too much credit assuming they're all paid off. There are a ton of assholes who will censor others for free.
About Tim Pool, I still don't get how anyone with a brain still argues that Tim doesn't appeal to the right, and in a lot of ways appeals to the far right
Yes the dude himself claims he's a centrist, and he very well be one, but his whole channel is centered around click baiting right wingers with very anti-left titles, he never posts anything that criticises the right (I know because I used to watch his stuff a lot)
Why can't these people just accept the fact that maybe, just maybe Tim found a gold mine (rage baiting right wingers) and is mining it to the last ore?
And even though Tim appeals to the right with his content, he still gets a lot of shit from his audience for "not being right wing enough" which is evidence that his audience contains a lot of far right dummies (yes all far right and far left people are dummies, anyone who is an extremist is a dumbass)
I agree, I'm left-leaning and used to watch his stuff back in 2016, I actually believe he used to align more with moderate left with strong narratives about the silent majority, then for some reason or another made a right wing switch to very different subject matter and political ideas and did both at the same time, weeeird vibes
@@De_La_Evo
I don't know how he was in 2016, I watched him throughout 2019 and his videos were pretty obviously directed at a right wing audience
And as I said, he himself may not be right wing, but he makes content dedicated to rage baiting the right
@@totalwartimelapses6359 I'm not arguing you dude
He’s definitely been critical of the right, but you are correct about the clickbait titles. While I’m sure the money plays a role, you can still see him transition from a Bernie bro to a trump liberal in real time if you follow him
I think people are too quick to play this off as liberals willfully joining far right. When the mainstream panders to the far left, the center feels politically homeless. The flip side is just as true historically
The comment downvote button actually DOES SOMETHING?? Well I sure wish I had known that sooner.
I have a friend who INSISTS that covid is fake and it makes me so mad because I’m too stupid to even argue with him, so I don’t argue with him at all.
Adam destroys stans with facts and logic
no he doesn't lol
@@phyzyc6765 Seemed like solid argument and points to me.
Did you buy your account or bot your subscriber numbers?
@@YouJustJealous None of the above. I used to upload content many years ago, mostly call of duty, but I quit. Deleted the videos and then came back.
@@phyzyc6765Babababa baaaa baaaa… three year old yes no yes no yes no conversation style or what?
Why does Joe rogan's opinion on anything matter?? He has no academic background or experience in any field besides entertainment..
That's the thing, it shouldn't matter much.. but the problem is his stans and antivac people think otherwise
Well he talks to people who do know their shit pretty consistently. Constantly relying on academics is cool and good until academics is full of ideologically motivated nonsense.
No academic background or experience doesn't stop people from voting, it would hardly stop them from voicing their opinions in a persuasive way.
From Quebec: never needed a vaccine to go to grocery stores.
You have put to words exactly how I feel about Rogan/his fans.
@@makeitthrough_ wow just group every one who likes the sport of martial arts to be a douche bag. Irony in this is the douchy attitude and thinking you have. Look in the mirror before judging others
Thank u Adum for expending energy on topics/crowds like this
Joe Rogan is 100% still on Spotify and there's multiple links on his page with "Learn about COVID-19" linking to some actual reputable sources, which I think is pretty funny.
Stans for anyone are the cringiest thing the internet has given us.
It's just "fanboys" with a new coat of paint thanks to the DreamSMP crap
I love a video where Adum just talks. Thank you for putting this together.
I love how people who love their tough manly man, Rogan, need to defend him from big bad Adum. Lol
What a dumb comment, not even a Rogan fan lol
@@ergoth154 why is it dumb lol it’s pretty true
Adum is not a "you don't have to think about it" guy
At what point between being on a show about eating insects and doing roids did Rogan gain enlightenment? I've never listened to what he's had to say, and I literally couldn't care less.
Well everyone knows that not listening to someone and just taking others word about them is the best way to judge them.
@@somethingsomething8511 The Venn diagram of whatever I do in my life and whatever Rogan does do not in any way intersect. I feel the same about him as he feels about me: nothing.
I think it was the point where he started swearing at an expert on chimps when she told him that what he thought was a new species of chimp wasn't actually a new species of chimp. He was so offended he wouldn't let her finish a single sentence, and after she left he claimed she was an example of somebody who thought they knew everything but was completely wrong.
Something something DMT
@@lich109 This sounds like a meme
My favorite part of this highlight was watching it for 5 minutes, accidentally dozing off, then waking up to a blaring ad that's just an entire 44-minute episode of a BlazeTV show (Chad Prather?) complaining about woke-ism or something? I skipped it but damn, it's wild that that's a thing that can happen.
Joe Rogan's friend's reaction to the vaccine sounds like a reaction to the needle, not the vaccine itself. I am needle phobic and sometimes get bad reactions just like that, sometimes don't. I got the J&J vaccine first and then a booster, so I've only gotten two shots. The first shot I had a bad reaction and was literally lying on the floor for like 15 minutes before my blood pressure got up high enough to walk out to my car. I've had reactions like that before, so I knew exactly what it was and wasn't scared by it. If I HADN'T had a reaction like that in the past, I can see myself panicking, making it worse, and being taken to the hospital to make sure it wasn't a reaction to the vaccine.
Booster shot was completely fine. Vasovagal reactions are weird.
19:55 Adam really hits the nail on the head here every conspiracy theory I see it’s a mix of the evil people being all powerful but Incompetent at the same Time. But like you can’t have it both ways
Of course you can have power and incompetence. A good example of that is nepotism.
@@emcee9899 true but what Adam is saying is a lot of those conspiracies have the elite people being all knowing, all powerful, and in total control. While at the same time making dumb and incompetent mistakes that blow their cover. Which doesn’t make sense to me if they’re supposedly all knowing and all powerful
@@lampini true. Nothing is omnipotent or omniscient, even those in power or in the know.
@@emcee9899 true but what I think Adam is saying is that conspiracy theories paint these people as such. Which doesn’t make sense once they claim they’re making incompetent errors along the way
@@lampini yes. They can't be all- powerful and all-knowing. But it is not unbelievable that evil people are in power doing horrible things, and wanting to do even worse things, but are unable to make those things happen because they are not intelligent.
The Reverse-Strawman: Simplifying your own side’s argument to the point that it’s not the same argument.
It’s a super manipulative pivot that these stans love to use.
Sounds pretty similar to the Motte and Bailey.
1) Say something outrageous.
2) Receive criticism.
3) Re-state your position as something bland and agreeable, completely removing your original intent in the process.
Jokes on you Adum, the Rogan stans are creating new accounts right now to flood this comment section!
Where are they?
Joke;s on them. Comments and thumbs down == 'engagement' == money.
No one ever called stans deep thinkers.
"You FOOL! I have 70 alternate accounts!"
I hate the way too common debate tactic of someone making their opponent prove they are not wrong. I can make a claim with no evidence, then my opponent makes a claim; all I have to do is say "how do you know that?" and I instantly have the upper hand. The burden of evidence is now on them and I don't have to explain myself until much later, if at all. Deflection like this is popular because it gives bad debaters that know they have flimsy arguments an out by making their opponent do all the work while acting holier than thou at the same time.
So you think you shouldn't have to provide any evidence to claims?
@@somethingsomething8511 This misconception is why people are easy to fool with Gish Gallop tactics, if you just let people make claims without evidence it takes disproportionately more time and effort to disprove something than it does to present any support for a claim. The Other Jared is making a fair statement, only if your debate opponent is actually acting in good faith, but that is often not the case. As soon as you cave to those tactics you've lost because the conspiratorial idiots have an endless supply of baseless claims they can weight you down with.
@@ifeeltiredsleepy If they demand evidence, provide it, then demand your own. If they don't, mock them endlessly for not providing it. This guy is acting like it's some trap when it's the easiest tactic to thwart.
@@somethingsomething8511your reading comprehension could use some work. They literally explained how it ISN'T easy to just provide evidence. I'll explain it AGAIN for you. A person says literally anything, and then tells you to prove them wrong. Now it's YOUR job to obtain the evidence, compile it, and come back with all of the information you need to prove them wrong, which takes time. It takes a few seconds to say some ridiculous misinformation, but hours, days, or even years to be able to explain why the information is inaccurate. Not to mention the person who made the statement often can't even understand HOW the information you gave them proves them wrong (there's a term for that, it's called the Dunning Kruger effect).
@@GenesisTheKitty your understanding of debate is hilariously simple minded. You are not their to convince the other person of anything, you're their convince the people who read it after the fact. The more you're able to readily access information or point to the location of the data the more credible your argument becomes to third parties.
“You need another ego death” LMAO
What I'd be curious about is how often commenters actually comment on any given channel. I don't think I've written a single comment on any of Adam's or this channels videos before (might be wrong), as I don't feel the need to comment on most of the things I watch unless something in the video, good or bad, motivated me enough to leave my thoughts. That being said I've probably watched dozens of hours of YMS, so it's not like I'm not a regular viewer.
Also gotta love the absolute hypocracy of someone rehashing the "Adum is a zoophile" BS and telling him to "do his research," only to - when I linked the video that explicitly stated they were wrong - go "well, I'm not watching an hour long video justifying zoophelia," meaning they A) gave the video equivalent of the "too long, didn't read" excuse (saying you're too cool for... *reading* doesn't make you look "based" it makes you look like a dispshit), and B) were not willing to do the most basic of research by WATCHING THE VIDEO RESPONDING TO THE ACCUSATION. You don't get to throw a pissy fit when others "don't do their research" only to do the same damn thing. In my case, you have even LESS of an excuse because the resources were HANDED TO YOU. It's so frustrating to deal with people like this.
There’s no justification for zoophilia full stop
@SuperJumpChump My entire comment was about how the Zoophelia accusations are FALSE. THERE IS NO "JUSTIFICATION." People strawman him as saying "Zoophelia is not an issue" when that's NOT what he actually said. Here, here's the link to the video. Come to your own conclusions. czcams.com/video/WDxthsz9G7s/video.html
@kar12894 *A)* Yes, I misspelled hypocricy; however, I don't see how a typo suddenly throws my ENTIRE comment out the window. Not to mention, trying to spin "misspelled a word" as equivalent to "cannot read / comprehend language in and of itself" is laughable. *B)* Instead of actually responding to **what I said** I'm simply called a "sensitive dumbfuck." I'm not insulted, I threw out insults in my original comment. HOWEVER, insults are not a REPLACEMENT for an argument.
*C)* I can write all I want online because I'm an ADULT who doesn't need mommy's permission. Projection, perhaps? 🙃
@@JackedThor-so "Bro just watch a 1 hour video about backpedalling lmao"
@kar12894 Excuse my incredibly stupid ass, but what does "mongo" mean?
Just wait till dunkey sees this on Drama Mondays. Your're gonna be in so much trouble, adam.
That sounds like a threat.
@@justincruz5720 it is
@@hexcodeff6624 Damn.
Wish there were more people out there being able to question themselves, like Adum! How will we ever learn and evolve if we're just repeating each other's bullshit instead of asking questions
Everyone is a Joe Rogen on some issues. Don't kid yourself.
Love videos like these of coalescing Adum's opinions on a thing.
The hilarity of people getting mad at governments when shit happens, meanwhile corporations do so much more harm with their lobbying dollar.
Here before [REDACTED] intoxicate the comment section.
Hill billies
So, if you don’t agree with the Rogan stans, you need to do your own research. If you do agree, then you’ve done enough research. Interesting how that works
It's magic!
2:12 I wasn't really surprised about it. Considering YMS was critical of the Santa Inc. trailer, I feel like that attracted some people from the "anti-woke crowd" which includes Joe Rogan stans. So people who aren't familiar with your content (hence not knowing you had tendinitis or that you were more on the left) assumed you were just against "wokeness" or PC culture from that one video.
i mean... adum is moderately anti woke. What the more extreme anti wokes will probably get triggered by is that he's pretty laxed with most of his opinions on political stuff and can make fun of both sides when he feels like it.
@@plantemor hes not anti woke. He just critical of superficial expressions of wokeness from corporations like Disney.
@@JustJack6719 I'd argue that's what he meant by anti-woke, but you never know. My thing is like... you can like a person but still think they said some dumb shit? You can be critical of the people and stuff you like.
@@JustJack6719 i cant wait til conservatives start calling trump a "superficial expression" of their ideology. imagine having corporate backing and shaking it off as inauthentic. its like saying you have no power as all institutional power coalesces behind you.
@@JustJack6719 That's what I meant with "moderately woke".
I’m really glad I’m not the only one who has noticed these accounts that have a default profile pic, usually are just the persons actual name as the username, and also very old accounts with no videos on them and very little in terms of comment history, and what little comment history that exists is just shit talking the channel they’re comment on. Seriously, who the fuck are these people and why are they everywhere?
I always wondered why they kept the downvote button in comments but that makes a lot of sense to have a metric for sorting comments. Gonna start reusing it. Thanks for the tip!
This is gonna be fun
I think people see two creators they like disagreeing on something and low-key see it like mom and dad arguing. Especially if they share a chunk of community. In a world with customizable news feeds, two creators you watch disagreeing can break the sense of homogeny; which shouldn't be as jarring as it appears to be to these people.
good take
That's embarassing.
I love it deep down. I like YMS and watch the occasional Rogan episode.
It’s nice to hear YMS talk about the things that annoy me about Rogan.
It’s like when Adam says around 48:00 to hear every point and find the truth.
I’m not a scientist, but the virus isn’t done and it’s not going away any time soon. People just stopped caring.
You mean to tell me Adam isn't going to type out 3671s worth of thoughts on Joe Rogan in a comment section? What a grifter.
This is why I’m not interested in JRE. It just sounds like Joe is talking out of his ass on topics he knows nothing about and spreads misinformation.
You got it in one.
@@GangsterFrankensteinComputer That's nothing compared to lying to people about myocarditis.
@@GangsterFrankensteinComputer Pretty sure it didn't seeing as how that was at the start of the pandemic and the message was that wearing a mask does not prevent you from catching it (which is still true) and they later realised that wearing a mask is still helpful because even though it doesn't stop you from catching it, it hinders you from spreading it.
@@GangsterFrankensteinComputer Not what I was saying. It was a novel virus, so the efficacy of various protective equipment wasn't fully known and they informed the public when it was known that the virus could pass through the mask.
That's maybe half true if you squint. The man has wackos on his show, usually admits when he's proven wrong, and also has very credible people of all sorts on his show. He's literally just some dude, not an expert in anything, who talks to various experts sometimes.
>They say it's and Alex Jones type conspiracy theory, so I think that's maybe a critical post? 7:30
There's considerable crossover between Alex Jones and Joe Rogan's fanbase.
good thing I can cliip everythin he says out of context.
Thanks!
Thanks for the juicy goodness
You hit the nail pointing out the obvious clickbait that I can't believe people take seriously. It's hilarious to me when I see articles titled "joe rogan says ____." I like his podcast but I don't think the validity of ones opinion is directly linked to the popularity of their content.
At least be a Stan for a funny comedian like Dhar Mann
I would agree with you about Joe Rogan he does think he knows more than the Doctors about vaccines and masks he has even had guests say to him I don’t know more than the Doctors. Joe does seem to think he know more about things than even the experts sometimes when most the information he gets is second hand just like everyone else
What the hell are you talking about
Joe doesn't say these things. He's guest often due. How are also experts.
On the point about how to tell how long someone has been watching the channel by looking at how many comments they've made and how long they've been subscribed, it should be pointed out that people can have a lot of different accounts on CZcams, or have just made a new account, and their statistics aren't necessarily going to be an accurate representation to how much exposure they have had to your channel. For instance, I am not even subscribed to this channel or YMS on this account, but I am on other accounts and have been watching YMS for, idk, 10 years at this point.
Sure, but having multiple accounts that you regularly use probably isn't common. If anything, having one main "watch" account that you use to comment on stuff seems to be the norm.
I was talking to my friend the other day about antivax and the mandates. I thought she was pro, but she said she was anti, and referred to "I believe in freedom of choice".
Now she just stopped talking to me. IDK if she's mad at me or not because of my reply, but I don't want to ruin my friendship with her. Adumbuddies what do?
My reply: While I agree freedom of choice is important, in this instance that choice impact's other's right to life.
Another way of looking at it is people can't choose to be infected by COVID or not, but they can choose how to limit its spread, evolution and severity.
Ask your friend if they think it's tyranny that the law forces them to wear seat belts. If they say yes, they've probably already gone off the deep end. If they're not sure, remind them that getting vaccinated not only protects them, but also the people they come in contact with as the amount of time it remains in their system is going to be shorter, as will the amount of time they can spread it. The last thing anyone wants is to learn they accidentally killed somebody by giving Covid to somebody who was vulnerable.
@@GangsterFrankensteinComputer What a bizarre comment. Do you think these lies are hard to disprove? It is not easy to avoid getting it in the slightest, it does not spread anything like AIDS (the simple fact you tried to compare the two tells me you have no idea how either of them spread), and PPE has not been normalised. A lot of places, especially in the US (and soon to be Canada) are lifting PPE restrictions and next to nobody wears masks in those areas.
Finally you're going to have to explain how being pro-vax makes somebody a crypto fascist.
@@GangsterFrankensteinComputer " If you wear proper PPE and take precautions you can't get covid. "
Well that's an absolute statement if I ever saw one... and a very misinformed one at that, evidence by the fact that you think that "If you don't come into contact with anyone with covid you can't catch covid.", another categorically false statement. COVID-19 can live on dry surfaces for up to three days, which means something as simple as handling money can theoretically get you sick. So unless you retort by saying "I ONLY pay with my credit card and/or online only", then you've already put yourself at risk.
Also, if you work with the public, such as- oh I don't know- a medical facility maybe, then you are coming in contact with hundreds of strangers, some of which could have COVID and you just don't know it, so to just say 'Avoid people with the disease' is just... not a realistic answer?
Based on your logic, the ONLY way to to avoid COVID is to work from home, order everything online and have it all be delivered to your doorstep, and otherwise never take a step outside of your home ever; and based on facts, those packages would have to be delivered by exclusively fully vaccinated individuals so your pizza delivery food doesn't come with a free side of COVID.
@@GangsterFrankensteinComputer bros why did this clown hijack my comment, take your bs somewhere else please
@@GangsterFrankensteinComputer That's a straight up lie. Covid does not spread through close physical contact, it spreads through respiratory droplets. I doubted that you were telling the truth about where you worked, but now that you're lying (or incredibly ignorant) about how Covid travels, I know for a fact you don't work in "unspecified medical facility/vaccination centre".
Somebody could sneeze on a parcel, and if you received that parcel two days later you can catch Covid.
Rogan fans are a joke like the quality of Rogan’s “stand up”
I was on Reddit last night, I saw a post in /AskReddit wherein a JR fan wanted to know what would be a reason to dislike JR. I commented, mentioning his eagerness to spread misinformation and talk out of his ass. I then get bombarded with, I shit you not, the same comments Adum is mentioning. "Oh he apologized!" or "Oh he isn't perfect! I'd like to see you have [X amount] of hours of conversation and make less errors than him!"
@@Shitposter-yp7dj I actually don't.
If you're the kind of person who cares about honesty, it's actually very easy to talk without spouting nothing but misinformation. Joe has a podcast to run, he's an entertainer not an educator, and he has no concern with being an honest entertainer. And of course his fans can't comprehend this lol
Joe Rogan fans have become such toxic crybabies.
53:40 I know it's not accurate, but your shirt will shine a certain truth on that take for un-knowledgeable observers.
Here I am.
Someone who barely heard about Joe Rogan but is a YMS watcher.
This is gonna be interesting, at the very least.
Better comment now, otherwise Adum will accuse me of not being a real fan sometime in the future.
Blackrock is a big if not the biggest investment firm out there. Maybe that's what the guy was referring to in the beginning part of this video
Adding a comment so Adam knows I’m a real fan 🙏
A constantly shifting rhetoric about the enemy being both overwhelmingly strong and pathetically weak isn't a new thing and is a staple of a specific political phenomenon called *drumroll please*..... FASCISM.
"I'm not attacked to my own political identity, I'm like... what? I'm canadian"
I think he was just clarifying his distance from the republican/democrat dichotomy because that isn’t Canada’s system
I've got no idea what is going on or who Joe Rogan is but for what I can gather covid has been way too politiziced in the english speaking world.
Imagine thinking that anti-vaxxers are worth clarifying yourself to
So happy you're talking about Rogan and the politics surrounding it. Not nearly enough people talk about this kind of stuff!! Can barely find anything about it anywhere. Phew
He has to talk about it because joe rogan stans have been coming at him lol. It seems you can't disagree with that moron without a lot of his fanbase coming to his defense.
@@chrisg6679 lol why even get started with it in the first place? Then upload a video. He made absolutely zero points that haven't been made by the billions of other posts about this stupid sht.
And the only criticism I had on his last video was things like him uploading a clip, then cutting out the part where Rogan apologized and admitted he was wrong. Then saying Rogan says "vaccines are bad". Have literally never heard that. Makes Adam look like a dishonest person.
And of course there were fans "defending him" hahaha. That's literally what people do for the people they watch and listen to. Including Adam's fans. During things like the Kimba stuff. People had to disable comments and sht bc Adam's viewers were flooding their videos. Or people going after Derek Savage over the cool cat sht, etc etc. It's what people do
And I'm definitely not a "Rogan fan". I disagree with a huge amount of stuff he says. Just don't be dishonest about the way you go after him
@@ocd9033 if you don't like his opinion why are you watching his youtube video that clearly lists what he is going to talk about. Maybe your ocd is you spread your opinion that nobody asked for as well and like to be annoying.
@@chrisg6679 Yeah bc if you don't like someone's opinion on something you shouldn't listen to anything they have to say. What a loser mindset you have.
And I have zero problems with his opinion. I actually agree with some his points on this subject. Just don't like the flat out false info.
And if you didn't like my opinion, why did you reply? Take your own advice if you're gonna give it. Now buzz off lmao
@@ocd9033 chris is totally right, we should stop expressing opinions on things entirely and remain in the safety and agreement of our echo chambers :^)))
I never clicked so fast in my life. I'm loving his takes on Joe Rogan.
6:49 That theory feels like a bastardization of that Kevin Bacon game. "If you go far enough"
The thing I'm curious about is: does adum own clothing that does not feature scar(?)?
I hate when people refuse to admit when they're wrong, or they get the sense that they're "losing" a discussion and so they lie just to "win", ugh, so annoying. Impossible to have a normal convo with some people, it's their ego above everything for them. I deal with someone like that all the time so it's therapeutic to hear Adum rant about it lol
1:00 Good to see that the album Gunfighter Ballads and Trail Songs by Marty Robbins is recommended for Adum. He's a cultured gentleman for sure.
Politically Adam leans Canadian.
19:52
See Umberto Eco's "Ur-Fascism"
This is one of the defining features of the fascist mindset.
Their 'enemy' is both so WEAK as to be beneath contempt; but also so STRONG as to automatically excuse any obviously horrific actions the fascists might 'need' to take to oppose them.
It's human behavior, not just fascist doctrine. Calm down.
@@PointsofData it is a built in element of fascist ideology and has been present in every fascist government to exist. I'm sorry but I do not hold this contradictory belief, so maybe it reflects upon the people you associate with, or the beliefs you hold that you believe it is "human nature" to have fascists tendencies.
perhaps you've been so conditioned by the people around you, that you see any use of the word fascism as sensationalism but ur-fascism is THE text for intellectually understanding the beliefs of the movement. I'm sorry it makes you uncomfortable but fact does not care about your feelings.
@@PointsofData we're all calm here dude chill ahahaha fascism isn't necessarily the solemn military dude in some WW2 movie , also Eco is quite the Chad when it comes to human behavioral patterns... "Just human behavior" doesn't contraddict Eco's observation... Interesting read that's all
BrO, JuST Do A lITtLe ResEaRch
I really liked you man, but you make good reviews and recommend movies I haven’t heard of. I guess I still like you.
More like Hoe Rogain and the 1001 holes in his brain
I love how scoot like an hour to get to Adam’s house
"you can find a connection to Big Pharma no matter who you're talking about"
LOL
Nice video
"I actively seek out opposing views"
as any intellectually-honest individual would. Remember when Joe would have flat-earthers and shit on the show and he'd just spend like an hour and a half grilling them like he's been starving for weeks? Good fucking times, man.
The risk for myocarditis is extremely low. Also if you aren't putting a lot of strain on that heart one week after the shot, like your doctor will tell you, it's extremely likely to heal without any lasting damage. As far as side effects of medicine go, the COVID vaccine is one of the safest things out there.
Well that's not true, compared to other vaccines it's not safe or effective.
@@tonypepperoni3679 quit your bullshit.
The myocarditis numbers are so low they would never have been discovered if we hadn't vaccinated hundreds of millions of people in a short amount of time. It's likely that most vaccines have similar side effects, as they are an overreaction of your immune system.
Also the COVID vaccines are more effective by light years than vaccines against the flu, also safer. Two years ago we thought we would be lucky if we'd get something more than 50% effectiveness in such a short time frame. The mRNA COVID vaccines are 95% effective against the strain they were designed for.
It's fairly safe and effective, and worth it from a cost/benefit analysis but I do think it's inaccurate to say "it's one of the safest things out there". Compared to most vaccines given to children the safety profile is a bit worse and the efficacy profile is much worse. Doesn't mean you shouldn't get it, but we should be honest about such things. If you get the Measles vaccine, you are not going to catch and die of measles, if you get the covid vaccine you can still catch and die of covid but it's way less likely.
@@4203105 define effective, because since the deployment of the vaccines we've had the largest spike in cases of the pandemic.
@@somethingsomething8511 no. There is a set definition. Look it up. I already wrote way too much in my initial response to your one sentence shitpost.
59:31 ... I thought I heard the 3x4 foot cat door and spray against the fridge.
When Rogan freely admits he doesn't do research it's pretty funny his fans would levy that criticism at you
comes back with different shirt
still has scar on it
He _is_ a horse detective!
1:33 good to know that adum personally killed Rosa Luxembourg