American CRJ-700 has LANDING GEAR ISSUES + Extreme Weather!
Vložit
- čas přidán 20. 08. 2024
- PSA CRJ700 performing flight from Birmingham to Philadelphia was inbound on a second attempt for landing when the pilots reported an issue being unable to lower the landing gear.
UNTRIMMED VERSION -- • EXTREME WEATHER + EMER...
Become a VIP member of VASAviation! -- / @vasaviation
That weather made things really difficult in Philadelphia. Kudos to pilots and ATC!
Watch the untrimmed version here --> czcams.com/video/lNL03sfp7Ew/video.html
bring the description reader back
Great job, doing the long version and the short version.
Philly S APP controller was fantastic. She was great at communicating with the emergency and even had the presence of mind to understand the probability of bad weather and worked around that whilst handling the emergency.
Hats off to ya, ma'am.
im just happy i could understand her
Thanks! I feel like I’m CZcams famous!
@@carolynatchley No way - are you her?! I don't comment on many videos but that was some seriously impressive work. Amazing job!
@@carolynatchley well done!!
David Graham yeah I was one of the two female controllers working.
Pretty helpful controllers. Their phraseology was great.
Omg the Wind you could pull up in a Cessna and would lift up like a helicopter while standing on the Parking spot
Indeed :O
Most people don't realize how powerful the wind is. 51 knots is enough to make it a full concentration job for an athletic person to stay standing up. At 75 knots no one can stand up unless they are holding onto something. This wind condition could make it tough to walk out to your Cessna and get in.
Speaking of "lift up like a helicopter": Has happend to me. In October 2018 there was a local storm with strong enough winds to lift a parked Morane Saulnier 885 into the air, including ripping the securing ropes with their attachment blocks (concrete embedded in the soil) out of the ground, then it flipped over and landed upside-down like a sandwich on top of my Beechcraft-A23A Musketeer that was parked next to it. Sadly, my plane (and the other one, too) was a total loss (and no insurance would pay for it because of the higher forces involved).
www.planepictures.net/v3/show.php?id=1488231
50 knots is a limitation per company policy
So, basically, you could tie a rope around my waist and fly me like a kite in that wind. I'm a measly ~104 pounds.
I hope that controller from Honolulu is taking notes 🤷🏻♂️
What is this comment in reference to?
Carl Youngblood czcams.com/video/2YstAqRy9A8/video.html
The lady ATC 's voice is very clear with good enunciation.
Amazing how clear the frequencies are. Dude you doing the most!.
dang i love how professional the pilots are and the approach controller she seems like she knows exactly whats shes doing
03:12 it's "gear disagree" instead of "gear scenario". It's one of the EICAS warning messages that is displayed on the CRJ. Great content, as always :D
High multiplication rate on board the American aircraft.
3:53 only 4
4:44 already 6
:-)
The gears stuck up? Well tell it it's no better than any of the other gear out there! It's just as good!
4 souls on board the ginger couple look back at the cockpit. Sorry 6 souls on board
4 souls, 2 beeings on board xD
Everyone involved did a great job! Well done.
That's the best controller voice me hear in long time. Put him in Hollywood movie.
Thats matthew mcconaughey in his 70s
"4 souls on board" WOW! 😲
CRJ driver here. Probably a reposition flight with no passengers on board. Captain, First Officer, Forward and Aft Flight Attendants. Just a guess though.
Or a test flight for acceptance, maybe even a demo or repo flight
highflyerl23 Yeah, he later says 6 souls on board at 4:34, so maybe they had maintenance guys with them. Just speculation.
Loads aren’t great at the moment... It could be a positioning/maintenance flight, but it wouldn’t be very odd if it were a normal revenue flight...
That's a scheduled revenue flight number. Reposition/ferry flight numbers for this airline are 9xxx. So the aircraft had two pilots, two flight attendants, and two passengers aboard.
Damn an emergency with extreme weather
The pilots should be crazy after this situation 😬🥴🤯
a truly withering emergency!
'Would all amateur gardeners please refrain from plant growing on our airfield at this time. Last warning! "
-I thought this was posted today ;(
FYI, at 3:11 he said he needed boxing vectors to run a checklist for a "gear disagree", rather than a gear scenario.
Thanks for the audio and visual. I like the presentation with the fast forwards.
7:31 "Left 360, Bluestreak 5543."
Even the plane didn't want to go to Philly and had to be pulled to a gate!
I loved hearing three down and locked
It's ALWAYS windy (not sunny, lol) in Philadelphia...I mean ALWAYS windy. I've never flown into or out of Philly ON TIME, & 99.9% of the time it's due to wind. I thought Chicago was the windy city, ha.
41G51kts that so windy!
I believe I repositioned a Crj 900 from PHL to ORF on this day. Winds were absolutely awful
Gust 51? Crazy winds. If that's not enough to do it, it makes me wonder what kind of winds it takes to shut down an airport besides the obvious (something like a hurricane or tornado directly overhead or in very close proximity).
Another terrific video with really nice graphics.
3:15 not "gear scenario" but "gear disagree"
ATC are so good!!!
I live near PHL. Crazy winds!
Can you do one on the FedEx MD-11 which overshoot the Runway in Mumbai!!
Already Done, Subscribe and check it out ✌
@@oswaldjames6295 I don't see it anywhere!
@@oswaldjames6295 OP means the recent one. It didn't run off the runway in the typical excursion manner. It landed long and overshot where it should've been. Still counts as an excursion in the books.
@@MayankPawar27 czcams.com/video/49FwcyjDDb0/video.html
@@hauntedshadowslegacy2826 czcams.com/video/49FwcyjDDb0/video.html
One doesn’t ride Bluestreak 5543, Bluestreak 5543 rides you.
Classic, CRJ and NWS inop. Another day in the office.
Wait, you can go around if you have landing gear problems? Should've told PAI8303...
Where can I learn the meanings of numbers and lines on the map?
czcams.com/video/J3NSzvVQAjU/video.html vas has a video on this!
Nice
umm.. why don't they put cameras near the landing gear so that pilots can see it?
Because they have indicators that tell them when the gear is down. A camera would be something that must be carried (airplanes hate excess weight), powered and displayed in an already display cockpit.
Gotta admit though... that’s not a bad idea, like I get the feeling that could
Be one of those “why didn’t we think of that” ideas lmao
@vasavation can you try to find audio on an alert 2 that happened near me on the 4 or 5th at alliance airport in Fort Worth texas
6 souls! That's 2 pilot and 4 cabin crew?
CRJ driver here. Havent watched the whole video yet but at 3:50 he says “4 souls on board” which would be the Captain, FO, forward FA and Aft FA.
@@editsbyshock yeah, later(4:33) he says 6 souls.
Ah yes, just saw it. Then it could be 2 passengers or maybe 2 maintenance personnel. Just speculation there, though. But the 700 has 2 pilots and 2 cabin attendants as I’ve listed above! Hope this answers your question (:
Fries
Why is the term used and when did it begin?
Jeffery Epstein Which term?
Good video!!! :)
300 at 36 gust 50 god damn
50 knots is the company limitations
Definitely a loss of hydraulics somewhere. Maybe they should make the nose wheel steering electric servo as standby.!
You can easily get the aircraft off the runway onto a high speed taxiway without the use of nosewheel steering. It is the bigger turns that are the problem.
@@markkeary8309 stick and rudder that's for sure.! Nice input with thanks..!
Curiosity question for anyone who knows, If there steering was inop did they get tugged off the runway or did they have slight steering from the rudder or something to get off the runway?
Plane's too heavy to turn with just rudder...unless they nosewheel steering started working, they would've been towed.
Well done by all!! Nothing I hated more than manual gear and flap extension
The flaps worked just fine.
@@markkeary8309 doesn't mean Phil enjoyed manually extending flaps...he listed them both because they are equivalent P.I.T.A.
CRJ now belongs to Mitsubishi Heavy not Bombardier
Why could he take the approach at 51 knots but the other could? Company protocol?
Yes company policy 50kts limit
And different aircraft with different limitations. But probably company policy too.
What does BOXING VECTORS mean?
Vectors in the area
That’s MRJ-700 to you
Lucky day
Brickyard: Yeah.
6 souls on board. That’s 2 passengers on a CRJ700.
that's Covid-19's effects on air travel for ya. Nobody's flying unless there's no other options.
Professionals all the way around.
Notice how the pilots didn’t continue the approach and scape the aircraft on the ground going too fast to stop and then go around with severe damage. Lookin at you Pakistan
6 souls on board. That’s it? Whoa
LOL meaning there was only 2 passengers.
Nobody wanted to fly that day..
@@coolbear6441 Most flight crew have no souls.😂
damn thats really a lot of wind
digital I was once a passenger on a flight that diverted due to gusts of 110 knots! Later that day the RCMP posted photos of cars blown off the highway and a train derailed due to the wind.
Not as much as my mother-in-law after icecream. 🤪
(Joking. My mother-in-law is actually nice)
Guys, what is gusts?
Rajadas de vento
LOL 😂 i think i found some aviation noobs
The way wind works, is that it mantains more or less a certain heading, and an average speed. However, another important factor is the gusts. They are basically spikes in wind speed, that last only seconds, but they can really affect the stability of the airplane.
I’m sure you have already experienced this many times, the wind seems to have always the same speed, but suddenly it becomes way stronger, just for a couple seconds or so.
That’s why ATC reports speed giving the heading (or a more general direction, definied by two different headings, if the wind is very variable), the average speed and the maximum gust speed
Порывы ветра
@@ahmedtracker2841 so you know everything about aviation? Why dont you explain what "gusts " means?
The fuel in hours vs fuel in pounds debate rages on.
They both matter - hours for route planning, weight for fires
Fire department needs it in pounds.
@@scose That's the right answer. There is no "debate".
To add some details to your answer, ARFF services needs to know fuel in pounds/kilograms to know how many fire engines to send out, and ATC needs to know it in hours/minutes to be able to figure out how soon they need to be on the ground.
oof gusting 50kt
Coupe subtle things. I bet the CA is new. He declares an emergency before even troubleshooting the gear issue. Then he keeps referring to the flight as ‘I’ like “I need vectors” etc rather than including the rest of his crew in those terms.
When he said "I", he meant the flight, not just himself.
Also, declaring an emergency when your gear doesn't deploy is perfectly okay. Even if they manage to get it down later, procedure of most airlines require a saftey landing anyway, which means that ARFF will need to stand by.
Declaring an emergency is never a bad thing, so why make it one? They have to go around, they must trouble shoot the problem, would you prefer they tell ATC they don’t want to land yet and keep them in the dark about the situation? When in doubt, declare an emergency to receive priority as you correct the problem. It can always be canceled. To your second argument... I’m not even going to attempt. In an emergency situation with multiple things going on, I suppose the pilot monitoring should have stated all the crews names to ATC for inclusion reasons so no one gets their feelings hurt...
Blue streak... more like brown streak.. the airline shits it’s pants over a little wind
Good thing the media wasn’t there, they would have called it a crash landing!
Yes, and of corce....
It's President Trump's fault! He should have known and prevented it!
Basically, there are no LANDING GEAR ISSUES because there are three other ways to get the landing gear down. Ultimately when nothing works the pilot can push the landing gear down with his foot, wham. Aircraft engineers know that this is what just cannot happen, LANDING GEAR ISSUES, that the landing gear doesn't extend. Of course, there are pilots who did not read the manual of their plane, pilots who only know how to rev the jet engines....
Yep, kicked down the 20 ton landing gear of an A380 just yesterday. Fell right into place... -.-
(In reality there indeed *is* a so-called "gravity option" which drops the gear without unsing motors or hydraulics, but it's still just a release handle in the cockpit and they still need to lock into the correct down position to be stable. Kicking the gear with your foot isn't only stupid in most commercial airplanes, it's also dangerous as the wheel hub usually isn't pressurized.)
What did I just read?
@@saxmanb777 drivel.
@@QemeH You sound frighteningly like a sim instructor I had once.
@@vernonsmithee792 I'm sorry to hear that ;D
First
When this happened?
Date at the beginning