Decoding the Trump Indictments
Vložit
- čas přidán 8. 04. 2024
- On March 28, 2024, Melissa Murray and Andrew Weissmann, coauthors of the new book The Trump Indictments, discussed the historic charges against the former president in a discussion moderated by Brennan Center President Michael Waldman. Murray is the Frederick I. and Grace Stokes Professor of Law Faculty and director of the Birnbaum Women’s Leadership Center at NYU Law. Weissmann, a professor of practice at NYU Law and a legal analyst for MSNBC, previously served as general counsel to the FBI and one of the senior prosecutors on Robert Mueller’s Trump-Russia investigation.
That was absolutely superb. I am so grateful to the Brennan Center. I attended a conference called the Promise and Limits of State Constitutions about two months ago and it was excellent. And sold out! (Not literally, because it was free.) I am also a proud alumna of NYU School of Law. Well done!!
😊😊😊😊😊
Person indicted
Woman prosecutes
Man guilty
Camera broadcasts
TV in jail
Lol, clever.
👌👌🏽👌🏿👌🏻👌🏾
Despite the very low volume of this discussion on my cell phone, I’m very grateful that you produced this. Thank you. 🎉
Literally low volume? Would a blue tooth speaker help?
Excellent discussion! Too short. Both Andrew Weismann and Mellisa Murray explain and dissect these issues in a comprehensive and succinct manner. Very illuminating.
Let's hope justice wins!
Lordy! This captivating discussion went by far too quickly... BRAVO and Many Thanks!☮
Always love Andrew & Melissa!
In my humble opinion and sad to say SCOTUS has fracture and Jack Smith has given SCOTUS the final chance to SCOTUS to validate its foundation as protector of LAW and Order and their final verdict on presidential immunity will determine whether SCOTUS still valid or if necessary, once and for all put to shame.
Just an observation, not a slight, the people who could benefit the most from watching this & reading the book are so entrenched in the falsities they've been bombarded with repeatedly won't se it or read it. They are so entrenched in their misbeliefs they find ways to convince themselves the truth is the lie.
True, however folks watching or reading the book may be able to reach people who’re not hard core MAGA, people I think aren’t worth wasting time attempting to persuade or convince. On the other hand you might be in a position to engage in a discussion with people who’re still open to new/different information and are persuadable, or in a group discussion where they’re present. It’s definitely worth expending energy talking with those folks.
Love that little exchange of ideas of you tooo. 👏🏿
I am so glad that Everyone, all around the world, can Hear this, you have to be interested enough Listen to Educated People , they spent a Lot of time in a Library Because They , Really Love & Want to be There. If you Love Reading? Don’t be Bullied! Keep on reading Anything & Every Thing You Can get Your Hands on! & In the Words of Stephen King “. Although growing up very poor in the great State of Maine . He became a High School Teacher.” Read , Read. Constant Reader. Love to Steve ❤ Our Friend . Thank you for Teaching us to not to give up our Freedom through Reading! 🎉🎉😊
Never give Up ❤to All. Thank you for this wonderful opportunity to share with us your thoughts about this Subject. Trump is not a good example of anyone else’s Future He doesn’t Even know about his Own background !
So hard to hear on my iPhone. Without a TV or computer in my home, I’m dependent on my iPhone - and as excited as I was to listen to this great discussion, I finally gave up at the midpoint.
Get some Bluetooth speakers/earbud! I did have it on 100% volume on my LG speakers, so the volume output was definitely too low! Sorry u didn't get to hear it all.
The impotence of the impeachment process led us to hope that the justice system would take the lead. But now we hear pushback from some about how the justice system should not step in where the Congress has already declared its opinion. It is a catch 22.
They are two entirely different things.
@@user-jz2iv8ui6xone is saying the other should handle it is what they mean.
A Sack of potatoes-
Until there are an even number of justices from both sides of the US Supreme Court nothing will change.
It should be law-
Here here!!!
This is great, but I for one (and I'm sure I'm not the only one) would appreciate it if the podcast audio was available on more platforms (not all of us listen via Apple podcasts and Spotify), such as Pocketcasts. (It's not difficult, trust me!) Thanks!
If the Supreme Court or Federalist judge prevent Jack Smiths case from going to trial this country will be furious.
Put Donald Trump in prison and make America Great Forever!!!💙💙💙
This panel is adept in legal gymnastics.
Has anyone in Intelligence made the case for how dangerous what Trump took is to national security?
pretty sure they have kept silent because what he took was so sensitive, I have thought how in God's earth did they just leave that with the idiot? What lax security, I am sure they are embarrassed
Politico August 27, 2022: “The U.S. intelligence community will evaluate the potential national security risks stemming from former President Donald Trump’s possession of top-secret documents at his Mar-a-Lago residence,” Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines told top lawmakers.
In a letter obtained by POLITICO and dated Friday, Haines told House Oversight Committee Chair Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) and House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) that her office will lead an “assessment of the potential risk to national security that would result from the disclosure of the relevant documents.” To date Haines has not provided to Congress any information regarding the results of the damage assessment.
@@joeb4142 Thanks for that concise update.
I hope they figure in the risk of what foreign dictators he would sell this information to in order to pay for his legal fees and judgments.
@@DaveT383too bad the sentiment is not worth the paper it was written on.
I am confused - what is scheduled for the end of October? I thought the presidential immunity oral arguments before the Supreme Court were scheduled for later this April??
The arguments will be heard on the last day possible of the current term. The earliest they could return a verdict is June. But if they don’t get to it by then, it will have to wait until after the summer break -October.
Point is, they could have gotten to it a lot earlier, if they had a mind to; or, as pointed out in the discussion, they could simply have passed, and let the district court’s ruling stand.
What I don't understand is why there is so little security around these documents that they could end up in boxes and no one in the security departments did not raise an alarm that docs were missing? Seems like incredibly slopping tracking for such important documents.
SCOTUS seems correct to me!
37 minutes in, and not a mention of the root violations of the Presidential Records Act. Otherwise tremendous survey of the landscape.
State's would be pressured to drop charges.
Similar to Texas and impeachment of Paxton.
It's a mistake to think Federal and State are separate if Trump becomes President.
The allegations, even if true, don't violate the specific statutes charged in any of the four cases
nice Beatles reference at 3:17 ...
Wow, this non partisan panel talk aged very badly now that we've had the Supreme Court oral arguments
Another intellectual gathering of impressive and educated opinions that are nothing new. We need courageous voices to alert the American people of just how extreme the danger is of losing our democracy, and keeping the topic entirely focused on how to stop this threatening menace that is Trump, his SCOTUS, and his fascists cohorts!
You apparently don't know what a fascist is.
Cliff Note: People who are innocent, I would think especially, ex presidents of the free world, would not be actively trying to delay ANY trial. Quite the contrary. Wouldn’t you? Says VOLUMES.
Can’t hear
The Brennan Center for Stalinist Justice
By the orange one’s logic, Biden should be able to take him out and face no consequences. And that, we must agree, is simply ludicrous.
Very poor levels of AUDIO!!!
Every American should read this book.
“Decoding”? These wyt bois be CRAZY!!!!
By the looks of your grammar, you must of attended trump university...
@@JBuch-zb2pd must HAVE
How could Fani Willis so stupidly endanger her extremely important case by her personal improprieties?
She’s human and humans make mistakes.
If her consensual not illegal relationship with a coworker endangered the trial of the century we have much bigger problems
Because she didn't.
How dare they dig into her personal life!!!
The nutritional value of European/American food per MEAL would equal 3 months of what we eat(NE India). If tise proteins and calories erect Trump or anybody 12 o'clock, and they have the money to buy a prostitute, it's nature's call and indicting them seems a bit harsh.....and Trump is a billionaire....
Biden 24🎉
The hush money case is baseless!
In that case he will be found not guilty.
If that was the case you trumpets wouldn't be screaming about it!!! He's going to jail!😂😂😂 And it isn't a hush money case, it's a campaign violation case. Educate yourself.
It's actually an " election interference" case.
@@angelapalmer6782 Hillary Clinton paid for the steel dossier with campaign finance money to dig up dirt on Donald Trump and leaked it to the media. Never charged?
Blah blah blah blah
If you don't see the CON then you are the MARK
Stop freebaseing fox news n get yourself educated? Or did u mainline the bleach your savior instructed you 2 do and our now the poster boy 4 stem cell research?
Thank you for being here.
You lost your credibility at the very beginning as “nonpartisan” with the dishonest framing of facts.
You are not fooling anyone.
Yeah great. How we ensure democracy, for the moment if we VOTE BLUE, IT'S WHAT WE MUST DO.