I will help to summarize it as below: $ Kg Kg/$ Milwaukee 70 577 8.24 Makita 45 443 9.84 Wurth 35 436 12.46 Forsage 10 385 38.50 Noname 2 65 32.50 So in summary, while Milwaukee wrench demonstrates the best quality, it's worth noting that in terms of Kg/$ spent, Forsage wrench appears to be the best bang for the buck.
I wouldn’t necessarily say forsage is the best bang for buck. Maybe for a light duty mechanic but in the end Milwaukee or makita would be the better option. Especially when they hold their value longer
Except additional cost for gasoline to go buy a new one. AND, if it is your profession, you have to refuse requests from customers if tools are broken which is a terrible opportunity loss.
On site cheat bars are used all the time with people putting there whole body weight on them to get bolts off. That must achieve something close to 400 kg
@@just1ofozz they have a bulit in deformity in the square so it breaks before the mechanism.... solid metal is always gonna be stronger this not a argument this is literally general knowledge
Thanks for the video. $70 wrenches must be better than $10 ones otherwise buyer will be mad. But the difference of broken point force doesn't justify the $60 cost difference LOL
The difference being, if you need tools for home, perfectly fine to buy cheap. It's different when you rely on your tools to make a living. Spend a bit more to have the confidence that they won't let you down when they are needed to pay the bills.
It's not just the breaking point alone that has to justify the cost, there's also wear and long-term durability. You also have to consider the general performance of the tool and how well the mechachinism ratchets. A cheap, sloppy ratchet mechanism can be difficult to use in a tight operating space. So, you might want something high quality and precise.
Here’s the thing, at least 3 of those wrenches were made in China. The matkita and milluaukee are, I’m pretty sure both made by the same megacorp in China.
As a modern engineer I’m not surprised that the 1970 wrench still took 1/2 the abuse and still was somewhat functional. New is cheaper, lighter, and economical to built but not always better. Modern cars are a great example of how crappy technology can be. You will never see a 2020 car survive until 2050 but yet all the cars built in 1970 have still made it to 2020. Sure they are heavy and get 15 mpg but they still made the journey and that’s what counts. Old engineering was built to last, not engineered to get you past the warranty so you can buy another. I will never forget my roots.
@@silverdog63 do your studies and not what they are telling you. More deaths today because of cars completely crushing. Old cars stood through accidents, sure we had deaths but not from hitting a deer, tree, large cat, hog, wooden fence etc. these are all things today’s cars will clasped in a low speed accident. The same people telling you new cars are better are the same people telling you electric car are green and that the oceans are rising. Remember Florida and California were not supposed to have beaches by 2010!!! People need to learn common sense again not what the brochure is telling you written by the person who benefits you buying it.
@@MeBallerman it’s good that you have an opinion but you make no sense. Look around you at the number of old cars that survived. The steel back than was 1/4-1/8 on the frame and 16 gauge doors, today,s cars are 30-26 gauge doors with lots of creases to make them sturdy. As an 43 year old engineer I seen it all and nothing built by corporate owned companies is built for the interest of surviving just to get by and sell them another. I will stand by my statement. But for your liberal tree hugging buddies a 1970 car probably didn’t survive if it was burned, crashed, found in the ocean on the Titanic I hope that clears it up for you!!
the same $10 china wrench i bought in china with delivery cost $2. its not very good but could use. if you pay $10in china you can got german quality wrench
El mecanismo es lo que fallara primero, con el uso diario es lo que fallan, sinla usas cientos de veces a la semana se quebra el mecanismo, lo digo por experiencia laboral, hemos quebrado 6 aprox en un año y las de mala calidad no duran ni 2 semanas.
hello The most famous wrench manufacturers in Japan are “KTC” and “TONE”, so I wanted to test with either of them. By the way, "MAKITA" is famous for electric tools. I'm using a translation tool, so I'm sorry if the sentences are strange.
Добрый день. Автор из России, купить KTC или TONE можно только под заказ, причём за очень высокую стоимость и сроки доставки. Тут представлены ключи которые продаются в обычном строительном магазине в России. Старые инструменты которые автор предоставляет на канале - обычно производства СССР
The more expensive ones will most likely have better quality. This video can calculate the cost-effectiveness, but it cannot tell which country’s products have better or worse quality.
@@andreaspallasch8372 "Japanese copied from nobody" yes they do through they entire history 🤣 Find out where Japanese writing, culture, weapons, construction methods and more come from
For those who think "any ratchet will do" is only true when its concerns strength. The difference in quality and design is a huge difference on the force one can apply. I had the pleasure to work with all major brands throughout my career. And it really makes a difference on how easy and fast you can do the job with proper tools.
Yes super Bee ,if a man can pull with that much power and hold it ,ITS NOT A RACHET HE NEEDS , YES there's better ,but the test wasn't about that ,so any rachet will do if it's only about applying power ,I have never seen anyone using a press on a rachet to slacken a bolt ,so in essence you r not so superbee unless u have been watching something else
@@sopissedoff The video shows the quality off the materials and the ratchet and it teeth. In this way the videomaker tries to show the quality of the tool. Sure no one can apply that much force. But what i wa aying is that there 's a difference in the afformentioned and the actual quality of use of the different brands. The chrome Snap on ratchet i have is one the strongest, but not the one who is best on grip and leverage wise. So the comment that any ratchet will do, STRENGTHWISE, is treu. Practical there is a great difference. And i wouldn't have to explain this to anybody who works with his hands......
@@superbee7936 I've had expensive tools and lost them ,had cheap and lost them ,and I hated seeing people putting poles over rachets for leverage ,yes there's good and better ,mid range probably cut the mustard good enough,A nice we fine 1/4 inch is possible the finest tool ,the rest of the toolbox pays the bills
Thank you for this video. You have shared valuable information. Some in the comments refuse to convert that to wisdom. I just built a 10m radio tower and ballast with my 1940's Snapon ratchet/gauge... but y'all can just keep talkin trash and livin your best life.
They are all produced in china. Comedy. China vs. china. Mesauring just how much the brand actually tranferred the money it got for its brand name to the product. Chines produce everything in required qualitiy if they are paid accordingly.
Its doesn't work like that. China is big factory but this doesn't make chinese all those things which made in China. If you buying Sony TV you don't call it LG because the main component of it - screen - is made by LG? Right?
If you buy based on whether you can put 420 or 440kg with your hands, you are buying on the wrong things… I think the Japanese and the German one are better for work because of the handle.
It's also important to note that the RATE of applying the downward force in the abovementioned test has to be constant across all the wrenches, or else it wouldn't be a fair comparison.
By the way: Würth is a German company, but they do not make their own tools. They buy them from all over the world and just put their name on. So the Würth ratchet in the video might actually be a Chinese one (although a good one). 🤣
@@s.m5174 these ratchets are no used for screws with a diameter of 30 mm. I work as a scaffolder and we use Mannesmann ratchets. They are for 19 mm and 32 mm screws and weigh 1 kg. These ratchets in the video are for small screws.
Más Arrecho y RESISTENTE es la Base, el Material y El DADO juntos con el sistema hidráulico que Han tenido que resistir TODAS esas Presiones de Pruebas, Excelente Muy Bien, saludos desde Caracas Venezuela 💪👍🤟
I dont know if the distance between center of rotation and the press is always the same, but it seems like the handles have different length. So it would be nice to make the results comparable by using newton meter. In addition the tension inside the square would be interesting.
I took screenshots, put the pics one on top of the other and yes, the distance between the center of rotation and the press is always the same, regardless the handle size.
You are wrong. Although the handle is longer, the distance where the press is placed is the same. then the motor of the press exerts exactly the same force.
@@joseperdomo9278 Well technically no, because of the linear motion of the press and the rotary motion of the handle the distance will slightly change. Additionally, the highest force is not always at the exact same point. But I think this is negligible, because it is a YT-Video and not a scientific experiment.
@@exitusthirteen It doesn't matter if the press starts higher or lower, the angle in grades of the handle where the press exerts pressure is the same and the distance from that pressure to the screw central is the same. So, it's the same.
What I want to know is what brand socket that is. For it to not split apart under those pressures is amazing. The only word I can see on that socket is “Forged”. I’ve had other cheaply made sockets spread apart by only using hand power.
O importante não está só na força de alavanca mas sim na quantidade de trabalho dos carretos internos que conforme o tempo e esforço de desgaste começa a folgar e avaria. Nunca homem algum vai fazer essa força. O desgaste interno é o fator mais importante.
Whoever have such strength as the machine that test the wrench must be a VERY Strong man. I would buy the $2 one or old wrench 1970 and it probably last me 20-40 years
Good review, testing method seemed quite consistent. Any of these rachets would work for me with the exception of the $2 No name rachet. 65 Kg of force is around 100ft-lbs (dependent on handle length), so I could break that. On Average, all the rachets broke around 1000 ft-lbs (+/-) except no name. Don't know about you but no nut I turn is torqued to 1000 ft-lbs, and even if it was, I don't have the physical strength to turn it let alone break it. It is after all, still a hand tool. The big difference would be the useability with the increased number of racheting teeth. The Wurth seems like a good balance between cost and number of teeth. For most home type applications, even the Fosage would last me a lifetime.
You're wrong in your conversions. 65 kg is roughly 650 Nm (Newton-meters), which is about 480 lbf (pound-feet) of torque. This is more than most car engines produce and way, *way* more than you can do with bare hands. You would need either to step on the ratchet (if you turn vertically), or use a much longer lever to produce that torque. So even the $2 ratchet does the job for like 95% of everyday uses. Nevertheless, personally I would opt for the Würth or the Makita.
Interesting video. They all seem over dimensionsed to be honest. Clearly they can all handle more pressure than they would ever see in daily use. So the winner is probably the lightest.
I guess I’m buying Milwaukee from now on! A follow-up video, part 2, demonstrating Crasftsman, Husky, Kobalt, Matco, Mac Tools, Blue-Point & Snap-On ratchets.
Yes we all need to see Craftsmen & Snap-On. Craftsmen isn't what it used to be so I bought my first Snap-on. Cost as much off the Snap-on truck as a very big Craftsmen set. I think S.O. is much better than C. but I'd like to see the test.
Lol, no, never. But with a possible lifespan of 80 years, life is short, so I would like to know which wrench will outlast me by a thousand years and then some. Just enjoy! On a side note, I have had a cheap ratchet wrench shear on me...I clearly outlasted that one.
Wenn du damit professionell arbeitest ist Hazet sicher 1. Wahl. Für mich als Gelegenheitsschrauber daheim wäre Makita oder KS allerdings ausreichend. Ist halt einfach nur die Frage des Preis/Leistungs/Gebrauchsverhältnis. Oft billig kaufen ist langfristig so teuer wie 1 x Hazet kaufen Was hier nicht getestet wurde Proxxon. Mein Akkuequipment ist Makita, Handequipment fast ausschließlich Proxxon.
Hahaha! I am an Indian and I worked in the Middle Eastern countries in oilfield services. With German companies they mostly prefer German tools and spares. The U.S companies prefer good tool and spares irrespective of the country of Origin as long as they provide reliable service. However what I found with the U.K companies was that they used to get cheaper spares and keep changing often. Thanks.
In fact, even in China a $10 wrench is considered low-end product. China also manufactures very expensive wrenches, which may far exceed your purchasing power. BTW, I'd like to mention that the testing equipment in the video is also made in China, you can see company name on metal tag "蚌埠大洋传感系统工程有限公司".
Milwaukee is an american brand, but produces in germany, china, czech republic and Taiwan.. So far for american made. Also Würth is by far one of the lowest quality you can get in Germany. If you want something realy high quality, you´d buy Gedore or Hazet. Unlikely there is anything better than those two tool brands...
These tests have two big problems. First, you should maintain constant lever length to know the real torque each wrench can withstand. In addition to that, regarding the wrenches have some flexibility, you should also consider the deformation reached on each test, and the lever ratio to know the actual maximum force, due to the lever changes along the press way down to the breaking point.
The distance between the square center to the press is constant, so isn't the first condition fairly well managed? changes with the height of the press in the point of break is occurred by deformation, it may change the kg but won't really change the rank.
@@kleeo83 You're right, what's changis is the camera position, or that's what I think it looks like now. But I also meantabout the "tensile tool" used. In this case are the big plane circle used by the press, and the changing position clamp on the other side of the wrench. And talking about the lever ratio changing because of the press position, the actual factor that is important here is the angle between the lever and the press: when usin a lever is not the same appliying 1000N at 90 degrees with the lever, than applying it with 70 degrees (with 90 degrees all force is becoming torque, and with 70 degrees some of the force is torque and some is becoming cutting strength). Sorry for bad english, since I'm not a native speaker and it's difficult to explain without a drawing or some images.
It's an intetesting test, but as many other, for high torque bolts/nuts I dont use this kind of tool until I have loosed it a bit. For me its much more important how many teeth it has, how is the grip etc.
My thought is, I’d rather have a wrench that had the drive square fail, as opposed to the mechanism. Two reasons; the drive square would (or should be) an easily) replaceable, and secondly it gives me more confidence in a high use item that the ratchet will hold up.
Yea that’s what I was thinking, makes the German and Japanese ones the better choice as they don’t have an integral square (and are also cheaper than the American one). It’s why deliberate points of failure can be very useful as safety features. Actually goes way back to the Romans, they mass produced javelins and designed the tips to be replaceable and fail, this mean the javelins in most cases could be repaired easily just by replacing the tip, prevented enemies from picking up their javelins and throwing them back to the romans, also means that they got stuck in enemy shields, making them heavy and much less useful, forcing enemies to ditch them and neutralising shield walls.
Drive square is not a standard part it is probably a casting with integral teeth and unique to each brand and model. It is probably not readily available as a spare so not easy or cheap to replace.
If you are strong enough to break any of those you don't need a wrench. Milwaukee don't have safety mechanism in square so that's why it hold the most.
My Summary: Forsage, China: $10, 385 Kg Wurth, Germany: $35, 436 kg Makita, Japan: $45, 443 Kg Milwaukee, USA: $70, 577 Kg noname: $2, 65 Kg Old 1970': 209 Kg Thanks for the video!!
As a heavy duty diesel tech Ill tell you Ive broken a few 1/2” snap-on and mac tools ratchets. Granted I was using a cheater bar to try and break some really tough bolts free. Ive never broken a 3/8 drive ratchet with my hand it definitely takes extra leverage.
@@juanfo7307 as a good diesel tech you should know 1/2 drives have smaller profiles than a 3/4 drive and some times you gotta do what you gotta do to get the job done. Thats why I buy quality tools because they have life time warranty and will just get it fixed/swapped out when my tool guy comes. Lol Ive been doing this over 13 years If its in a semi truck Ive done it
@@juanfo7307 and breaker bars break just like ratchets, and yes Ive heated bolts red hot to break em loose but you can’t always use the torch. How long have you been working with tools? Since you know it all apparently
You can put a pipe on the handle of the rachet, and you will be able to break even the "good" ones just by hand. It happened to me several times (Würth, Makita, Proxxon, Hazet)
Problem with cheap ones is not just material strength which is decent but some times moving parts are off in dimensions or don't have an optional design. I.e. a loose racket wrench.
For those of you talking about human strength. It’s common practice to use leverage or to hit the wrench so this is useful. Also heavy pressure in a short time can indicate over a long time. Also
@@QuadMech still a sin. Just because you own something, it doesn’t mean you should destroy it. If I owned a rare car would you think it was fine to destroy it?
The test only shows the load that can be endured. but no one manages to muster this strength. Since I have worked with most of these tools, I can confidently say that the Würth is the one that fits best in the hand and is the best to work with.
Warum nicht mal ne Ganzstahl Ausführung von Stahlwille, Hazet oder Gedore...? Das der Milwaukee 4 Kant mehr aushält liegt einzig daran das es Vollmaterial war und keine Bohrung hatte wie die anderen Probanden.
After seeing this test and the prices, if I had to choose I would buy 4 pcs for 10$, two (one for backup if the other one is damaged/lost) in a portable tool box for working outside the city + one in the car tool box + one in the home + 1 can of WD-40 spray lubricant! 😂😂😂
I would've liked to know the distance between the socket and the hydraulic press so we can also see how much torque was applied, not just the raw force.
I was using no name ratchet. It served me a good job, unless I applied on with the weight of 70 kg, it cracked mechanism of the ratchet is damaged, it rotates freely in any direction.
@@clipsedrag13 made in china yes, thought Makita is owned by japanese people, the video make it look like milwaukee is owned by US citizen, when it is not anymore.
@@waitakiorchards743 Yeah...no...at the extension of the press used in the video, naturally 🥴. Of course my question was poorly worded, and I actually want to know whether the worst rachet handle could be broken by a human without extending the lever.....which I suspect you knew 🤨.
@@titaniumtinman2809 You could put your weight on it, or you could use your muscles. But you'll never be able to snap the square off or wreck the mechanism.
The head of the Milwaukee tool seems larger, which could be a problem working in cramp areas. One thing that is not addressed is the length from the center of the socket to where the press pushes at the wrench. The longer this length is, the more torgue is put on the wrench given a certain kg push. The Milwaukee tool seems longer thus the press seems to push further away from the center of the socket, so it has taken even a higher torgue than the other wrenches... But that price is not for me.
Bom meus amigos, eu trabalhando na mecânica de aviação com ferramentas de fabricação americana e de fato elas são extremamente boas de trabalho seguras e forte o bastante pra toda vida. O vídeo é muito bom 😁 Gostei bastante e mandei pra meus amigos mecânico e que ama mecânica
São chinesas mas as marcas não. Mesmo que sejam produzidas na China elas seguem projeto e especificações dos países de origem. Seria a mesma coisa que dizer que o Iphone é chinês porque é fabricado na China.
@@XxGearx ué vc é uma ferramenta? Rsss. Mas a lógica contrária pode ser usada, Seus pais são brasileiros , te planejam no Brasil, você é concebido e nasce na China, vcs voltam pro Brasil, vc é chinês? Rsss
After 30+ years of using those tools, my favorites are Stahlwille (German), Gedore (don't know where from), Snap-On(US), Hazet(German), Milwaukee(US). There were some from other manufacturers I don't remember but I never managed to break one worth more than 60€/$. Of the cheap ones, I broke some when working without my own tools. In most cases If on low budget, I'd rather go for a used high quality tool, car, or other than for a cheap new one - always worked for me.
I will help to summarize it as below:
$ Kg Kg/$
Milwaukee 70 577 8.24
Makita 45 443 9.84
Wurth 35 436 12.46
Forsage 10 385 38.50
Noname 2 65 32.50
So in summary, while Milwaukee wrench demonstrates the best quality, it's worth noting that in terms of Kg/$ spent, Forsage wrench appears to be the best bang for the buck.
I wouldn’t necessarily say forsage is the best bang for buck. Maybe for a light duty mechanic but in the end Milwaukee or makita would be the better option. Especially when they hold their value longer
👏👏👏👌forcage is the best one. 370 kg in 30 centimeter means about 1300 N/m.
_____________$ Kg Cost per Kg
Milwaukee 70 577 0.12
Makita 45 443 0.10
Wurth 35 436 0.08
Forsage 10 385 0.02
Noname 2 65 0.03
Thank you!
Except additional cost for gasoline to go buy a new one. AND, if it is your profession, you have to refuse requests from customers if tools are broken which is a terrible opportunity loss.
I'll remember not to apply more than 400 kg with my hand. Thanks.
Said force or more could easily be achieved by 'hand' with the addition of a 'cheater bar/pipe'!
Lmao 🤣☠️💀🤣☠️💀😂 best comment
On site cheat bars are used all the time with people putting there whole body weight on them to get bolts off. That must achieve something close to 400 kg
Jajajajajajajajajajajajajaja you make me laugh!!!! 😂
75 plp n this guy have no clue 😂
I don’t know about you guys but I’m pretty impressed with the actual socket used!
Solid metal is stronger than teeth on a gear ....whats so surprising about that ?
@@jwanilpatel3223 The mechanism was stronger than the solid metal square for more than half the tools here. The socket is actually pretty badass.
@@just1ofozz they have a bulit in deformity in the square so it breaks before the mechanism.... solid metal is always gonna be stronger this not a argument this is literally general knowledge
I agree
Thanks for the video. $70 wrenches must be better than $10 ones otherwise buyer will be mad. But the difference of broken point force doesn't justify the $60 cost difference LOL
Thanks, I will by 700$ wrenches, and stay hungry for the whole month.
The wrench Pittsburgh label is cheap and lifetime warranty. You take it to the H. Freight store and they will exchange it for a new one.
The difference being, if you need tools for home, perfectly fine to buy cheap. It's different when you rely on your tools to make a living. Spend a bit more to have the confidence that they won't let you down when they are needed to pay the bills.
It's not just the breaking point alone that has to justify the cost, there's also wear and long-term durability. You also have to consider the general performance of the tool and how well the mechachinism ratchets. A cheap, sloppy ratchet mechanism can be difficult to use in a tight operating space. So, you might want something high quality and precise.
it's a 15$ wrench and 55$ brand name since they are mostly made in CHINA,VIETNAM,and MEXICO
Here’s the thing, at least 3 of those wrenches were made in China. The matkita and milluaukee are, I’m pretty sure both made by the same megacorp in China.
Lol I was gonna say the same thing
If the manufacturing process is the same, it doesn't matter who makes it. The key is who does the quality control.🤔
@@user-bn5ut9pl5sNo, the most important thing is you got what you paid
wurth is also made in china.....
@@taktlosnixda2478and your 2buck iPhone too...
As a modern engineer I’m not surprised that the 1970 wrench still took 1/2 the abuse and still was somewhat functional. New is cheaper, lighter, and economical to built but not always better. Modern cars are a great example of how crappy technology can be. You will never see a 2020 car survive until 2050 but yet all the cars built in 1970 have still made it to 2020. Sure they are heavy and get 15 mpg but they still made the journey and that’s what counts. Old engineering was built to last, not engineered to get you past the warranty so you can buy another. I will never forget my roots.
The problem is that is you who are not going to survive in case of a serious accident
@@silverdog63 do your studies and not what they are telling you. More deaths today because of cars completely crushing. Old cars stood through accidents, sure we had deaths but not from hitting a deer, tree, large cat, hog, wooden fence etc. these are all things today’s cars will clasped in a low speed accident. The same people telling you new cars are better are the same people telling you electric car are green and that the oceans are rising. Remember Florida and California were not supposed to have beaches by 2010!!! People need to learn common sense again not what the brochure is telling you written by the person who benefits you buying it.
Amen
Not all cars from 1970 have survived? What drug are you on? The 1970ies were known to produce some of the worst rust buckets ever built?
@@MeBallerman it’s good that you have an opinion but you make no sense. Look around you at the number of old cars that survived. The steel back than was 1/4-1/8 on the frame and 16 gauge doors, today,s cars are 30-26 gauge doors with lots of creases to make them sturdy. As an 43 year old engineer I seen it all and nothing built by corporate owned companies is built for the interest of surviving just to get by and sell them another. I will stand by my statement. But for your liberal tree hugging buddies a 1970 car probably didn’t survive if it was burned, crashed, found in the ocean on the Titanic I hope that clears it up for you!!
Finally i know my favourite tool ratchet brand i use in my workshop after 10years. Tq noname.
Xddd
高い負荷で内部の歯車や機構が破損する工具は日常的な負荷での故障も多いと思います。工具が壊れるほどの負荷をかける作業は滅多にありませんが、どの様に壊れたかを知り原因や適切な工具の形状と素材を考える事は次の買い物や道具の使い方で失敗をしない方法の1つです。その点でこの人の動画はとても有意義です♪
会社や商品で比較するのはいいけど、国につなげるのはちょっとね
@@user-uuueo ナショナリズムは社会生物種として否定できないし忘れ去る事もできない、脳幹の奥に刻まれた本能だから
さすがアメリカ製最高だ
观察的不错。大部分的扳手断裂都是与头部的金属疲劳有关，但一般也不会有人用到他能够金属疲劳的程度。这个视频的展示更多是娱乐性的，而非与扳手的功能好坏有什么关系。差一点的扳手依然能完成任务。具体还是看预算选购。
@@jyi9929その通り(o^^o)動画内での2$の工具以外は十分な耐久性があると思います。ヘッドにボルトが使用されている場合は振動でそのボルト自体が脱落する場合があるので購入の時に注意が必要です♪︎
I can say that a $10 Chinese wrench is totally enough because I never saw a 400kg tightened screw...
the same $10 china wrench i bought in china with delivery cost $2. its not very good but could use. if you pay $10in china you can got german quality wrench
stupid test
@@nielsonzhen3751 Next time buy top Chinese brand.
It would be a bolt and some torque specs go into the hundreds of foot pounds.
El mecanismo es lo que fallara primero, con el uso diario es lo que fallan, sinla usas cientos de veces a la semana se quebra el mecanismo, lo digo por experiencia laboral, hemos quebrado 6 aprox en un año y las de mala calidad no duran ni 2 semanas.
hello
The most famous wrench manufacturers in Japan are “KTC” and “TONE”, so I wanted to test with either of them.
By the way, "MAKITA" is famous for electric tools.
I'm using a translation tool, so I'm sorry if the sentences are strange.
never mind, none of them represents the best from each
Sounds okay for a translation.
Makita strong as electric tool
Добрый день. Автор из России, купить KTC или TONE можно только под заказ, причём за очень высокую стоимость и сроки доставки. Тут представлены ключи которые продаются в обычном строительном магазине в России. Старые инструменты которые автор предоставляет на канале - обычно производства СССР
Maybe all of them were made in China except 1970s, even the hydraulic press😂😂
that's true different price different quality
😅😅are you kidding me this is a joke who told you they’re made in china this is bullshit
The more expensive ones will most likely have better quality. This video can calculate the cost-effectiveness, but it cannot tell which country’s products have better or worse quality.
Exactly!
@@liudavid9533it is right. Most of those tools are surely made in China.
The brands owner leads the quality.
For example milwaukee is made in China
Thank you for showing the strength of these materials.
👍👍👍
What purpose would it have served? Can you apply such high force using your hands?
@@TheIldebrandoz with time you would have the Same result.
It is a pity that the representative made in Japan is "Makita". Japan has the strongest brands, "KTC" and "TONE".
@@andreaspallasch8372 I agree. I buy Würth only if I can't get something else.
They have j.o.b marvel tools as well not pretty but so professional better than all the usual "good" brands they sell us
@@andreaspallasch8372
"Japanese copied from nobody" yes they do through they entire history 🤣
Find out where Japanese writing, culture, weapons, construction methods and more come from
Would be nice to see each country’s best but that could get expensive quick.
Would love to see Snap On, MAC, Cromwell
@@demcq9534
need money to buy it all
For those who think "any ratchet will do" is only true when its concerns strength. The difference in quality and design is a huge difference on the force one can apply. I had the pleasure to work with all major brands throughout my career. And it really makes a difference on how easy and fast you can do the job with proper tools.
Yes super Bee ,if a man can pull with that much power and hold it ,ITS NOT A RACHET HE NEEDS , YES there's better ,but the test wasn't about that ,so any rachet will do if it's only about applying power ,I have never seen anyone using a press on a rachet to slacken a bolt ,so in essence you r not so superbee unless u have been watching something else
@@sopissedoff The video shows the quality off the materials and the ratchet and it teeth. In this way the videomaker tries to show the quality of the tool. Sure no one can apply that much force. But what i wa aying is that there 's a difference in the afformentioned and the actual quality of use of the different brands. The chrome Snap on ratchet i have is one the strongest, but not the one who is best on grip and leverage wise. So the comment that any ratchet will do, STRENGTHWISE, is treu. Practical there is a great difference. And i wouldn't have to explain this to anybody who works with his hands......
@@superbee7936 I've had expensive tools and lost them ,had cheap and lost them ,and I hated seeing people putting poles over rachets for leverage ,yes there's good and better ,mid range probably cut the mustard good enough,A nice we fine 1/4 inch is possible the finest tool ,the rest of the toolbox pays the bills
@@superbee7936 does show quality,
there is no difficult work if not inadequate tools

There is no difficult work if not inadequate tools.
I’ve had my no name ratchet set for 35 years, works great.
Thank you for this video. You have shared valuable information. Some in the comments refuse to convert that to wisdom. I just built a 10m radio tower and ballast with my 1940's Snapon ratchet/gauge... but y'all can just keep talkin trash and livin your best life.
For Japan it should be Koken wrench. Makita product is famous only electric handtool.
Nah, nepros
Klein... no electrician I know EVER uses Makita, anything.
KTC(KYOTO TOOL Co.Ltd 京都機械工具)
Electrician? He said electric tools and that is truth at least in europe.
日本ではTONEが有名です。
They are all produced in china. Comedy. China vs. china. Mesauring just how much the brand actually tranferred the money it got for its brand name to the product. Chines produce everything in required qualitiy if they are paid accordingly.
Its doesn't work like that. China is big factory but this doesn't make chinese all those things which made in China. If you buying Sony TV you don't call it LG because the main component of it - screen - is made by LG? Right?
Every single thing in that TV is made in China
You should list them when finished. Would help to figure out what to buy! Thank you! Love your videos! 😀
Porównanie z dupy wykonaj identyczne otwory jak w pozostałych
Look at project farms channell he does a more comprehensive test and lists
@@lutomson3496 he has good site!
If you buy based on whether you can put 420 or 440kg with your hands, you are buying on the wrong things… I think the Japanese and the German one are better for work because of the handle.
For the quality, Milwaukee wins
For the price at kg/$, Forsage wins
$1 for 8.24 kg Versus $1 for 38.50 kg
It's also important to note that the RATE of applying the downward force in the abovementioned test has to be constant across all the wrenches, or else it wouldn't be a fair comparison.
Она постоянно. Всё хорошо, дорогой
70’s: Jamming, but useable. Gotta love the 70’s.
They don’t make em like they used to, huh?
The 70's was all about jamming 😊
By the way: Würth is a German company, but they do not make their own tools. They buy them from all over the world and just put their name on. So the Würth ratchet in the video might actually be a Chinese one (although a good one). 🤣
Imagine the profits 😬
Yes, he should test hazet for Germany
@@s.m5174 these ratchets are no used for screws with a diameter of 30 mm. I work as a scaffolder and we use Mannesmann ratchets. They are for 19 mm and 32 mm screws and weigh 1 kg. These ratchets in the video are for small screws.
@@MD-gr6so what do you mean? We use it every day
Más Arrecho y RESISTENTE es la Base, el Material y El DADO juntos con el sistema hidráulico que Han tenido que resistir TODAS esas Presiones de Pruebas, Excelente Muy Bien, saludos desde Caracas Venezuela 💪👍🤟
I'm Japanese, but I didn't know that Makita had manual tools.
我是中国人，它是翻出一个元朝的工具吗？😂
Good to know the limits of your tools for your safety 😁
I love these test!.
Thanks. :)
For Germany: "Hazet" is THE number one for wrenches. A special brand for mechanics.
Würth is german too, but more an allround seller.
Stahlwile?Dowidat, Gedore,Usag,Facom,Unior?
Facom France
And the Würth Tool in this video is pretty sure made in China as well.
😢
I dont know if the distance between center of rotation and the press is always the same, but it seems like the handles have different length. So it would be nice to make the results comparable by using newton meter. In addition the tension inside the square would be interesting.
I took screenshots, put the pics one on top of the other and yes, the distance between the center of rotation and the press is always the same, regardless the handle size.
You are wrong. Although the handle is longer, the distance where the press is placed is the same. then the motor of the press exerts exactly the same force.
@@mkilic10 Thanks for checking!
@@joseperdomo9278 Well technically no, because of the linear motion of the press and the rotary motion of the handle the distance will slightly change. Additionally, the highest force is not always at the exact same point. But I think this is negligible, because it is a YT-Video and not a scientific experiment.
@@exitusthirteen It doesn't matter if the press starts higher or lower, the angle in grades of the handle where the press exerts pressure is the same and the distance from that pressure to the screw central is the same. So, it's the same.
Quem consegue imprimir tanta força na ferramenta assim ?
O mais importante nao é sua durabilidade, resistencia ao desgaste?
What I want to know is what brand socket that is. For it to not split apart under those pressures is amazing. The only word I can see on that socket is “Forged”. I’ve had other cheaply made sockets spread apart by only using hand power.
Levando em conta que as chaves não são pra força estão ótimos os testes
O importante não está só na força de alavanca mas sim na quantidade de trabalho dos carretos internos que conforme o tempo e esforço de desgaste começa a folgar e avaria.
Nunca homem algum vai fazer essa força.
O desgaste interno é o fator mais importante.
Concordo com vc.
É a durabilidade no dia a dia de trabalho.
Asi es compa...👍
Very interesting and useful video.! Congratulations.!!
I got exactly the same of that no name 2$, bought in a box with a few more parts for around €15. It worj fine for me for years 👍
They're all useful, the $2 is an exception. But at the end its all market competition.
Id buy one for $10-$30 max & keep it for generations.
Whoever have such strength as the machine that test the wrench must be a VERY Strong man.
I would buy the $2 one or old wrench 1970 and it probably last me 20-40 years
Hell no, the 2$ will break at the first time you will put some force on it.
But the 10$ is enough.
Good review, testing method seemed quite consistent. Any of these rachets would work for me with the exception of the $2 No name rachet. 65 Kg of force is around 100ft-lbs (dependent on handle length), so I could break that. On Average, all the rachets broke around 1000 ft-lbs (+/-) except no name. Don't know about you but no nut I turn is torqued to 1000 ft-lbs, and even if it was, I don't have the physical strength to turn it let alone break it. It is after all, still a hand tool. The big difference would be the useability with the increased number of racheting teeth. The Wurth seems like a good balance between cost and number of teeth. For most home type applications, even the Fosage would last me a lifetime.
Pura cheater bar on it and ill bet you'll break em
@工业党驻油管代表处 不顺滑，差得太远。对我十块钱的也还行。够用不是特别烂。
You're wrong in your conversions. 65 kg is roughly 650 Nm (Newton-meters), which is about 480 lbf (pound-feet) of torque. This is more than most car engines produce and way, *way* more than you can do with bare hands. You would need either to step on the ratchet (if you turn vertically), or use a much longer lever to produce that torque. So even the $2 ratchet does the job for like 95% of everyday uses.
Nevertheless, personally I would opt for the Würth or the Makita.
100 pounds is not even close to 65 kgs..
65 kgs is the weight of an average chubby girl.
You could break it with your hand?
Interesting video. They all seem over dimensionsed to be honest. Clearly they can all handle more pressure than they would ever see in daily use. So the winner is probably the lightest.
I like American tool design, no plastic handguards, no bulshit, straight piece of heavy cold steel that can be used 100 years from now
I guess I’m buying Milwaukee from now on!
A follow-up video, part 2, demonstrating Crasftsman, Husky, Kobalt, Matco, Mac Tools, Blue-Point & Snap-On ratchets.
Yes we all need to see Craftsmen & Snap-On. Craftsmen isn't what it used to be so I bought my first Snap-on. Cost as much off the Snap-on truck as a very big Craftsmen set. I think S.O. is much better than C. but I'd like to see the test.
Will you ever put 500kg on it?
Lol, no, never. But with a possible lifespan of 80 years, life is short, so I would like to know which wrench will outlast me by a thousand years and then some. Just enjoy!
On a side note, I have had a cheap ratchet wrench shear on me...I clearly outlasted that one.
I have a German 'Hazet' 1/2 wrench from the late 80's still going strong! Looks similar to the Würth in the test.
Good old hp 916❤️
@@PSNeko no HP, but it reads 916-SP. Thnx, Lukas, I never knew the type nr, checked it just now for the first time after 30+ years.
@@baeruuttehei1393 HP is the new version. I also got the 916-sp. Love it :)
Wenn du damit professionell arbeitest ist Hazet sicher 1. Wahl. Für mich als Gelegenheitsschrauber daheim wäre Makita oder KS allerdings ausreichend. Ist halt einfach nur die Frage des Preis/Leistungs/Gebrauchsverhältnis. Oft billig kaufen ist langfristig so teuer wie 1 x Hazet kaufen
Was hier nicht getestet wurde Proxxon. Mein Akkuequipment ist Makita, Handequipment fast ausschließlich Proxxon.
not German, but Nazi
That socket done amazing fair play😮 I'm super surprised that it didn't split under the pressure
Awesome test!
O bocal é super forte!Sobreviveu a todas as chaves
This is all about longevity and precision tool 🔧 good 👍 video
I'm sold for that Milwaukee wrench! Proudly made in the USA!
Más importante es la durabilidad Interna de la herramienta
The 10 dollar one is working just fine for most cases
99,999999% cases
Hahaha!
I am an Indian and I worked in the Middle Eastern countries in oilfield services. With German companies they mostly prefer German tools and spares. The U.S companies prefer good tool and spares irrespective of the country of Origin as long as they provide reliable service. However what I found with the U.K companies was that they used to get cheaper spares and keep changing often.
Thanks.
American made is the way to go still today 💪🏻
In fact, even in China a $10 wrench is considered low-end product. China also manufactures very expensive wrenches, which may far exceed your purchasing power. BTW, I'd like to mention that the testing equipment in the video is also made in China, you can see company name on metal tag "蚌埠大洋传感系统工程有限公司".
Milwaukee is an american brand, but produces in germany, china, czech republic and Taiwan.. So far for american made. Also Würth is by far one of the lowest quality you can get in Germany. If you want something realy high quality, you´d buy Gedore or Hazet. Unlikely there is anything better than those two tool brands...
I found this to be oddly entertaining. You kept my interest. Im a 61 yr old ex- mechanic...female. lol
These tests have two big problems.
First, you should maintain constant lever length to know the real torque each wrench can withstand.
In addition to that, regarding the wrenches have some flexibility, you should also consider the deformation reached on each test, and the lever ratio to know the actual maximum force, due to the lever changes along the press way down to the breaking point.
Not many people will understand what you’re saying
its not a test, its just "lets put these ratchets under hydraulic press and see what happens"
The distance between the square center to the press is constant, so isn't the first condition fairly well managed? changes with the height of the press in the point of break is occurred by deformation, it may change the kg but won't really change the rank.
@@kleeo83 You're right, what's changis is the camera position, or that's what I think it looks like now. But I also meantabout the "tensile tool" used. In this case are the big plane circle used by the press, and the changing position clamp on the other side of the wrench.
And talking about the lever ratio changing because of the press position, the actual factor that is important here is the angle between the lever and the press: when usin a lever is not the same appliying 1000N at 90 degrees with the lever, than applying it with 70 degrees (with 90 degrees all force is becoming torque, and with 70 degrees some of the force is torque and some is becoming cutting strength).
Sorry for bad english, since I'm not a native speaker and it's difficult to explain without a drawing or some images.
You explained why I felt doubt with this video.
It's an intetesting test, but as many other, for high torque bolts/nuts I dont use this kind of tool until I have loosed it a bit.
For me its much more important how many teeth it has, how is the grip etc.
That is true. I use a simple breaker bar for high torgue.
My thought is, I’d rather have a wrench that had the drive square fail, as opposed to the mechanism. Two reasons; the drive square would (or should be) an easily) replaceable, and secondly it gives me more confidence in a high use item that the ratchet will hold up.
Yea that’s what I was thinking, makes the German and Japanese ones the better choice as they don’t have an integral square (and are also cheaper than the American one). It’s why deliberate points of failure can be very useful as safety features.
Actually goes way back to the Romans, they mass produced javelins and designed the tips to be replaceable and fail, this mean the javelins in most cases could be repaired easily just by replacing the tip, prevented enemies from picking up their javelins and throwing them back to the romans, also means that they got stuck in enemy shields, making them heavy and much less useful, forcing enemies to ditch them and neutralising shield walls.
Drive square is not a standard part it is probably a casting with integral teeth and unique to each brand and model.
It is probably not readily available as a spare so not easy or cheap to replace.
I was expecting the old one to do much better. Things were made much more durable back then
If you are strong enough to break any of those you don't need a wrench. Milwaukee don't have safety mechanism in square so that's why it hold the most.
That's right. See how it flew off. Could be lethal damage if not taken care of.
My tools from the 1970s are still going strong thanks. 🤓
My Summary:
Forsage, China: $10, 385 Kg
Wurth, Germany: $35, 436 kg
Makita, Japan: $45, 443 Kg
Milwaukee, USA: $70, 577 Kg
noname: $2, 65 Kg
Old 1970': 209 Kg
Thanks for the video!!
These Wrench companies would not have thought tht one day one youtuber will do such tests.. in public domain 😂
As a heavy duty diesel tech Ill tell you Ive broken a few 1/2” snap-on and mac tools ratchets. Granted I was using a cheater bar to try and break some really tough bolts free. Ive never broken a 3/8 drive ratchet with my hand it definitely takes extra leverage.
you should work with german tools, dont play...
Any self respecting "heavy duty diesel tech" should know the difference and never use a cheater on a ratchet.
@@juanfo7307 heavy duty diesel tech? wow. i didnt know, the US are so stupid....Play again.....
@@juanfo7307 as a good diesel tech you should know 1/2 drives have smaller profiles than a 3/4 drive and some times you gotta do what you gotta do to get the job done. Thats why I buy quality tools because they have life time warranty and will just get it fixed/swapped out when my tool guy comes. Lol Ive been doing this over 13 years If its in a semi truck Ive done it
@@juanfo7307 and breaker bars break just like ratchets, and yes Ive heated bolts red hot to break em loose but you can’t always use the torch. How long have you been working with tools? Since you know it all apparently
Any man that can pull a rachet 250 kg is a good man ,any rachet will do in that case
And it should be at the lowest price
10$ socket is enough
Pruebas de torsión con diferentes marcas de palancas 👍
Will recommend the cheapest one,normally your hands strength won't be so strong.
You can put a pipe on the handle of the rachet, and you will be able to break even the "good" ones just by hand. It happened to me several times (Würth, Makita, Proxxon, Hazet)
65kg?
@@GrafHolock I don't usually use this for high torque. This type wrenches is just for convenient. My colleague used for a year, I use four years.
Problem with cheap ones is not just material strength which is decent but some times moving parts are off in dimensions or don't have an optional design.
I.e. a loose racket wrench.
You should try some of those old russian wrenches. Made in sssr.
Lo mejor de esas pruebas fue el tubo y la morsa .
Tremendo
Never imagined something made in America would be the best quality.
For those of you talking about human strength. It’s common practice to use leverage or to hit the wrench so this is useful. Also heavy pressure in a short time can indicate over a long time.
Also
Assuming you didn’t loose it, stolen or borrowed! Lol
No teste vemos que o preço é coerente com a qualidade
Verdade.
Para uso doméstico 385 kg é bastante, pelo que a Chinesa é melhor no custo-benefício.
snap on?
mac tools?
matco?
Can you test the above wrenches?
You have become Milwaukee's best salesperson.
still made in China
Diese Ratsche sollte man einmal mit Produkten von Hazet oder Gedore vergleichen!
That old ratchet had survived through tough times until the owner decides to put to its limit.
Ya era para museo .
Yes. What a sin.
Yeah, it wasn't right to do that to the old wrench. 😥
The 'Owner' is the key word here. While you own your opinions, you did NOT own this ratchet.
@@QuadMech still a sin. Just because you own something, it doesn’t mean you should destroy it. If I owned a rare car would you think it was fine to destroy it?
Awesome video!
The test only shows the load that can be endured. but no one manages to muster this strength. Since I have worked with most of these tools, I can confidently say that the Würth is the one that fits best in the hand and is the best to work with.
The Würth Wrench is NOT Made in Germany, so its just a wrench with a german brand name.
Correct. Würth Zebra is made in Taiwan. This one here is new and Not availible here in Germany.
in deutschland benutzen alle makita
@@robinhood768 Nö. Ich z.B. Wera oder PB Swiss.
Warum nicht mal ne Ganzstahl Ausführung von Stahlwille, Hazet oder Gedore...? Das der Milwaukee 4 Kant mehr aushält liegt einzig daran das es Vollmaterial war und keine Bohrung hatte wie die anderen Probanden.
Milwaukee for the win! That's a buttload in pounds. Most did far better than I would have guessed.
Don't forget: you only paid $2 for cheap tools, you'll get what your paid for. It's not bad for home use. ( Normally people don't use tools everyday)
I want to know what brand of sockets you are using. I have seen socket failure before ratchet failure. I need to get those sockets.
excelente prueba, en mi opinión lo mejor por experiencia es japonés y americano....!!!!
That 2$ and 10$ wrench is the most cost effective. I will not bother having a pair of both, but i will probably still buy that 75$ for heavy duty job.
Bought both expensive and cheap wrenches. Cheap one i lend to my friend to avoid being called stingy guy.
@@zaldanzig you give a great idea thanks 😂
Wonder how much force is on those squares after you factor leverage on top of the weight
All of them are good, so go for the cheap and light ones🎉
After seeing this test and the prices, if I had to choose I would buy 4 pcs for 10$, two (one for backup if the other one is damaged/lost) in a portable tool box for working outside the city + one in the car tool box + one in the home + 1 can of WD-40 spray lubricant! 😂😂😂
Conclusion: A mid - class ratchet will do its job, like almost always. Thanks, very interesting!
The amount of play and the corrosion resistance could also be factors to take into consideration.
These are ALL. Cheap ratchets ! A good ratchet cost $300
@@clarkgriswald1768 What in the world does a $300 ratchet (in the same size class as these) can do any better? Does it make effing coffee?!
@@ThatGoat has a nice fat handle ,so it can be used at play time
@@hakimmohamad6216 ergonomics would be a good consideration too.
The Chinese "FORCE" 30mm socket is the really strong one here
CHINA NUMBA ONE
And cost only $10.
"FORCE" is from Taiwan, not China.
Moral to the story? Buy whatever brand socket that was because you could move mountains with that thing!
I would've liked to know the distance between the socket and the hydraulic press so we can also see how much torque was applied, not just the raw force.
Lo mejor de esas pruebas fue el tubo y la morsa .
Tremendo aguante
Cool test! I was quite surprised at how much abuse that 2 dollar ratchet took to be honest!
It only made it to 50 that's nothing. I've broken so many of those things. It's probably equivalent to like 100-200 Newton meters of torque
What is cool here? Destroying good tools for ...what? Nothing.
@@nebojsasinjkevic1358totally agree 😊!
I was using no name ratchet. It served me a good job, unless I applied on with the weight of 70 kg, it cracked mechanism of the ratchet is damaged, it rotates freely in any direction.
Milwaukee for the win. Nice tool 🔧
There are no extraordinary items with low value for money😂!
I would point out the milwaukee, althought it started in the US, is owned and produced in China.
All of those told are made in china 😂
@@clipsedrag13 made in china yes, thought Makita is owned by japanese people, the video make it look like milwaukee is owned by US citizen, when it is not anymore.
@@elgrosdude7
Is that why China is so rich
Milwaukee, makita, wurth they are made i Taiwan not China it is a big difference
An informative video.
I'd like to know, as a comparison, what the comparative maximum torque a human can deliver on one of these ratchet-handles?
Depends how long your piece of pipe is.
@@waitakiorchards743
Yeah...no...at the extension of the press used in the video, naturally 🥴. Of course my question was poorly worded, and I actually want to know whether the worst rachet handle could be broken by a human without extending the lever.....which I suspect you knew 🤨.
@@titaniumtinman2809
You could put your weight on it, or you could use your muscles.
But you'll never be able to snap the square off or wreck the mechanism.
100kg. If your weight is 100 kg.
Otherwise you fly.
Means ...ca. 250 Nm.
The head of the Milwaukee tool seems larger, which could be a problem working in cramp areas. One thing that is not addressed is the length from the center of the socket to where the press pushes at the wrench. The longer this length is, the more torgue is put on the wrench given a certain kg push. The Milwaukee tool seems longer thus the press seems to push further away from the center of the socket, so it has taken even a higher torgue than the other wrenches... But that price is not for me.
Its great to see america still makes the best tools
They're made in China tho
I like the Japanese stuff...it never brakes, unless you have a use hydraulic press of course ☺
Indeed it only steps on the gas.
Bom meus amigos, eu trabalhando na mecânica de aviação com ferramentas de fabricação americana e de fato elas são extremamente boas de trabalho seguras e forte o bastante pra toda vida.
O vídeo é muito bom 😁
Gostei bastante e mandei pra meus amigos mecânico e que ama mecânica
As ferramentas desse vídeo são todas chinesas.
São chinesas mas as marcas não. Mesmo que sejam produzidas na China elas seguem projeto e especificações dos países de origem. Seria a mesma coisa que dizer que o Iphone é chinês porque é fabricado na China.
@@memnochdk Eu nasci no Brasil mas meus pais me planejaram e fizeram em uma viagem no canadá então sou Canadense? kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
@@XxGearx ué vc é uma ferramenta? Rsss. Mas a lógica contrária pode ser usada, Seus pais são brasileiros , te planejam no Brasil, você é concebido e nasce na China, vcs voltam pro Brasil, vc é chinês? Rsss
@@paulotrigo1 NON CREDO SIA VERO
Next time Godzilla asks to borrow one of my wrenches I’ll be sure to give him the American one.
After 30+ years of using those tools, my favorites are Stahlwille (German), Gedore (don't know where from), Snap-On(US), Hazet(German), Milwaukee(US). There were some from other manufacturers I don't remember but I never managed to break one worth more than 60€/$. Of the cheap ones, I broke some when working without my own tools. In most cases If on low budget, I'd rather go for a used high quality tool, car, or other than for a cheap new one - always worked for me.
Würth is not really top notch.
Gedore is also from Germany.
Хотелось бы видео на испытание ключей накидных с храповым механизмом
Should test the warranty on the wrenches & see if they replace or repair them 😁
Except, of course, the Chinesium one. Just sayin'.
Take the Milwaukee wrench back and they will as long as there is no pipe marks on it
😊 suficiente para mí por precio! Jamás llegaré a apretar tanto! China está bien