The Size of the Universe - Martin Rees
Vložit
- čas přidán 15. 06. 2017
- Serious Science - serious-science.org
Cosmologist Martin Rees on the history of astronomy, first nanoseconds of the universe and the theory of multiple Big Bangs
serious-science.org/the_size_o... - Věda a technologie
Martin Rees is so humble when discussing speculative science. Great man
All great minds are from England, or to some extend, Europe, not America.
Rees reminds me of Sagan and Krauss in regards to how effortlessly he simplifies these matters for the layman.
Such a brilliant mind.
I hope lord Rees loves forever. I could listen to him speak every day
Covered a lot in just 11 minutes. Great man.
I've read one pretty good Cosmology book by Martin. This wasn't done to long ago; good to see that he's looking pretty healthy. He should be able to make it to the coming Nano era . . . and Quantum Computers.
Fantastic. Extremely interesting. Thanks.
I love his book - Just Six Numbers".
Dear Sir Martin, Do you think there are potential risks in over extrapolation from limited data?
I love cosmology. Cyclic or eternal inflation? Hope the Webb can give us more insight.
Martin Reese is great.
Such a lovely person..
size does not matter,
what matters is that how "fine-tuned" it is.
Power is nothing without control
11:00 Ding Ding Ding ... It is all wrong, but at least Martin has the humility to admit it.
Lets continue to keep a vigilant eye on those pesky asteroids , so our descendants can have fun figuring out more cosmology!
The multi bangs.
what time is it on earth . .
LOL
ASMR voice 😌👍
Coming of age in the Milky Way
We will still see everything in our local group due to gravity.
Andromeda, 200 million light years away
2 million or 200 million?
@@jamesanthony5681 about 2 million light years
@@lorimercampbell301 Yes.
who is this guy
@Al Phabet just like borris Johnson then
Why does anything exist at all?
Why does anything move? Who moves and motivates all that exists? The "big bang" is not an accident or haphazard event.
Beautifully and amazingly depressing.
these cosmologists are freaks of nature!
They have zero empirical evidence that lights in the sky have mass.
/watch?v=3qijp8jEfa0&t=6s /watch?v=7arFLtY41DM /watch?v=QfsBpwy2DhA /watch?v=KlJsVqc0ywM /watch?v=8HPxSDRMouA
/watch?v=f3zmWOfracE /watch?v=_dztpMdxnak&t=1s
these "Eric Dubay" stuff you mentioned are good for having fun,as I had fun with them, but I don't take them seriously,those things don't match up mathematically in a consistent way.
Dubay is controlled opposition, Did you observe those link? actually not dubay. /watch?v=LXZmGctAoaA&t=0s personally, i do not support him.
I watched them, without any mathematics ,it's hard to take them seriously, for dismiss flat earth idea, it's enough for both of us to have a skype chat and at the same time aim our cameras at the sky,I'm in Iran and I presume you are in Europe or America. a single visual skype chat will debunk the flat earth idea.
Dr Jordan Peterson please.don't waste people's time... I hope you are posting in jest.
The two concepts cannot produce life. They only can produce a universe that is going into eternal destruction. The love of the creator saved the universe from being destroyed through his light (holy spirit) and through that universe we were given life and the opportunity to become conscious just like God
ThE lOvE oF tHe CrEaToR. Get it together, George.
🤣🤣😂😂😂 good one... join a comedy tour... you have talent, fruitcake