Martin Rees - Did Our Universe Have a Beginning?
Vložit
- čas přidán 5. 09. 2024
- Everything in the universe has a beginning, but how can the universe as a whole have a beginning? Does the cosmos come with a start date? Does a universal commencement make sense? What would it possibly mean? And what if there are multiple universes? Does the entire multiverse have a beginning?
Free access to Closer to Truth's library of 5,000 videos: bit.ly/376lkKN
Watch more interviews on cosmology: bit.ly/36SlsAy
Martin John Rees, Baron Rees of Ludlow is a British cosmologist and astrophysicist. He served as Astronomer Royal and Master of Trinity College, Cambridge. Rees was President of the Royal Society.
Register for free at CTT.com for subscriber-only exclusives: bit.ly/2GXmFsP
Closer to Truth presents the world’s greatest thinkers exploring humanity’s deepest questions. Discover fundamental issues of existence. Engage new and diverse ways of thinking. Appreciate intense debates. Share your own opinions. Seek your own answers.
Mind boggling no matter how many times I watch these same videos on the universe
Legend. He went to my school, too. He’s in an old school photo with my English teacher.
If that really was the beginning of the Universe in it’s entirety, and if the Universe is meant to continue expanding forever, then we are extremely lucky to be here at such a very early stage of the supposed lifespan of the Universe. 13.8 billion years is comparable to the first milliseconds when compared to the trillions and trillions and trillions of years to come
Exactly.
Hoyle was right, the big bang with initial inflation stage is a patchwork quilt, it's simply not clean enough.
A steady state universe, with no beginning and no end, forever expanding and accelerating in its expansion, seems more probable now.
Always remember, in physics, indications that back bad theories can look extremely "conclusive", only for them to be proven wrong by a later, deeper understanding, so might it be in the case of the discoveries that seem to back the big bang theory, CBR for example can be explained in a forever expanding accelerating universe. The other observations mentioned in this video, can also be consistent with a steady state expanding accelerating universe.
I always hated the big bang theory right from when I first studied it in physics at university, but was too shy (and ill equipped) to challenge the orthodoxy. Now that the universe has been found to be accelerating, dare I say I might have been right.
I think it's wide open.
@@motherofallemails "A steady state universe, with no beginning and no end, forever expanding and accelerating in its expansion, seems more probable now."
Is this in congruence with the majority of scientists belief, or are you stating it seems more probable to you?
sir Martin Rees. I love you your series (what we still don't know)
What is the universe expanding into? What is the "into"?
The big bang theory idea is too easy of an answer and never explains what brought about the dense circle and what actually triggered the band to happen? ( Now experts are moving away from that with newer theories) Even a bigger mystery is how could it happen without time?
It doesn't matter that they say time began at the moment of the big bang because that is just not possible. Time is something that CANNOT NOT EXIST, period. Time exists whether anything else exists or not. This is just a convenient way for them to get around many questions they cannot and never will be able to answer and also to try to make their theory about this big bang theory look as if it makes sense when in fact it makes no sense at all and furthermore doesn't explain where this infinitely small singularity came from into existence. And according to this theory, it began to expand or inflate into a non existent area creating space as it did expand. In order for anything to expand, the space in which it will expand into has to already exist. They are smoking some pretty potent weed. They are framing this as if the universe is a creating force that is in itself a non contingent necessary existence, to avoid bringing a higher creative force into the equation. Right now you have 2 choices. The universe always existed, which makes no sense at all, or that you can get something from nothing, which also makes no sense. I believe it is something entirely different, and no one has even the smallest clue as to what it might really be. How can anyone speak of ♾️ when there is no way to be able to imagine it. And yet that is what always existed would require. If you can get something out of nothing, then becoming a trillionaire from being a beggar on the street seems easy enough, and makes me wonder what they are waiting for to make trillions of dollars appear on their cardboard boxes
Nobody knows whether there are or can be black holes within black holes. There is no way of knowing whether the universe itself is possibly a black hole.
Rees didn’t really address the fundamental question that was being posed, namely, was there a beginning? It is certainly important and fascinating to know what happened down to a mind-boggling fraction of a second, but that still doesn’t tell us what happened at THE beginning, meaning at T=0 seconds.
He did address it. He said before a microsecond, it's just theory and that there may not be a time dimension , so to ask what happened at T=0 is meaningless, like what's north of the North Pole.
Did you watch the video? Do you understand English?
@@LuigiSimoncini In realtà, non parlo molto bene l'inglese. Forse dovrei smettere di lasciare commenti fino a quando la mia comprensione dell'inglese non migliorerà. Mi dispiace molto averti disturbato.
@@SuperManning11 makes sense, don't bash yourself
Amazing
How articulate is Martin Rees.
He has a triangular shaped dictionary hidden up his nose.
How did I know he'd be English before I even clicked?
the English pretend to be the smartest
In order for something to have a beginning, it must be subjected to time - by definition!
But only physical matter is affected by time (Einstein's theory of gravitation) so therefore, only our physical universe had a beginning.
Science found such a beginning when they discovered the Higgs boson in 2012.
That beginning was very soon after the Big Bang when the Higgs boson appeared and gave matter mass.
Einstein said that mass curves the fabric of space into the 4th dimension known as time.
Once matter acquired mass, it had a beginning and was forever subjected to time.
However, the energy field at the root of physical matter (String Theory, Quantum Field Theory) is NOT subjected to time as energy can neither be created nor destroyed.
So, the short answer is yes and no.
Yes, our physical universe had a beginning.
No, our energetic universe behind physical existence does not.
Dual nature - hmmmm....what else has dual nature in the universe?
what year this was recorded ?
Conditions were metastable prior to the differentiation of time. The differentiation of time left them unstable, bringing on the big bang.
From the book … Travelling to Infinity: My Life with Stephen ... author Jane Hawking ... The True Story Behind the Theory of Everything.
Only a month later we found ourselves again in Rome, where Stephen was to be admitted by the Pope to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, despite the heresies he was still preaching about the universe having neither a beginning or an end.
I watched and listened from the sidelines and my heart sank as I heard it repeated again and again in some form or other. "Professor Hawking, what does your research tell you about the existence of God? Or "Is there room for God in the universe you describe?" or, more directly, "Do you believe in God?" Always the answer was the same. No, Stephen did not believe in God and there was no room for God in his universe.
What if other structures, in this dimension or another, existed before our universe? Who is to say that this universe is the only one and that all dimensions existed at the same time. What was the universe before it started expanding? What is the universe expanding into?
I don't think that this is a reasonable question.
In our holy book QURAN ALLAH SAID:
Say, "Do you indeed disbelieve in He who created the earth in two days and attribute to Him equals? That is the Lord of the worlds.") And He placed on it [i.e., the earth] firmly set mountains over its surface, and He blessed it and determined therein its [creatures'] sustenance in four days without distinction[1384] - for [the information of] those who ask. 11) Then He directed Himself[1385] to the heaven while it was smoke and said to it and to the earth, "Come [into being],[1386] willingly or by compulsion." They said, "We have come willingly."
(12) And He completed them as seven heavens within two days and inspired [i.e., made known] in each heaven its command. And We adorned the nearest heaven with lamps [i.e., stars, for beauty] and as protection.[1387] That is the determination of the Exalted in Might, the Knowing.
Before you ask if there was a beginning you must define excactly the beginning of „what“? The beginning of the visible i.e. observable universe or the entire universe? These are two different things. The visible universe started shortly after the big bang but this big bang was maybe not also the start of the entire universe which we know is at least 125 Million times as voluminous as the visible universe and the entire universe might be Even infinite.
When Dr Rees says something, one feels COMPELLED to agree with him..Good interview.
Awesome Cool Video
Could there be a relationship between a Big Bang and whatever that thing is that pops out at the 'other end' of a Black Hole? 🤔 #Multiverses ?
Imagine a universe in which a black hole swallows everything until there's nothing left outside. Then imagine that scenario _in reverse._ Looks rather like a universe expanding from a big bang...
Martin is a very good speaker, very clear, however the interview should have been longer to deal with other issues at Big Bang, such as Inflation, Dark Matter, Dark Energy, antimatter and backward time. These are fundamental issues and as a consequence, the picture Martin painted was too simplistic. Also, the sudden creation of the universe ex nihilo, implies the existence of G-D.
Oh cool same question as Facebook today where I commented, Truth lol
In the beginning GOD even before big bang.... 🙏 Brother James
Real beginning is always in lead! 😉
The logical answer is: The universe(s) has always been here.
How is that logical? Where could/would it have come from?
Logical yes but that is not enough because there are many logical explanations which are not necessarily supported by measured data and only these can be called scientific.
@@misterphmpg8106 It is the only logical explanation because you only need infinite existence and the first belief of existence to have a neutral concept of existence, you can't logically say the words replication or repeat unless you were actually cloning your first belief of existence infinitely. Measurement is believing you exist because you therefore actually exist and if you actually exist then you will first believe you exist, the odds of existing and first believing you exist are the same even if the odds themselves are different. Science, God, evolution, and religion are all different concepts of existence but they are still the same existence as an infinite first belief of existence, you and your thoughts will never change but they will repeat by believing this is your first belief of existence which is the realization that this is actually your infinite first belief of existence.
@@daniely8350 Itself, where else would evolution or God come from, God and evolution are only metaphors for becoming and being existence, history is finite so the first belief of history will repeat itself infinitely.
@@theuniques1199 That's a fallacy of infinite regression, which is a form of circular reasoning.
Maybe the universe never started unless we redefine what we mean by the description universe
... Alluded but Relativity is not discussed. Why? It is all about Relativity.
Die Kosmologie macht sich meiner Meinung nach
das Leben besonders schwer.
Die Physik weiß heute, dass wenn man über
Materie spricht, damit die Felder von Photon, von
Elektron, Felder von Fermion und von Boson
gemeint ist.
Feldschwingungen mit Knoten, deren Ausprägung
in unterschiedlicher Erscheinung das Seiende ist.
Soweit die Physik. Nun die Ursache, die dazu führt:
Im Nichts, tritt eine singuläre Störung auf.
Das Nichts zerreißt in dieser Singularität zu Etwas
Und Feldschwingungen mit Knoten, mit Ausprägung
in unterschiedlicher Erscheinung, sind das nicht
mehr zu beendende Resultat.
Es bedarf keiner unendlichen Dichte eines Urknalls.
Die absolut einheitliche Glätte des Nichts bricht
auf und gibt die Physik mit aller Gesetzmäßigkeit.
Sollte sich eines Tages diese Störung aus ebben,
und alle Feldschwingung glätten, enden auch die
unterschiedlichen Erscheinungen des Seienden.
🤔
Thanks for the video. I admire his style. Institutionalized cosmology won't take us any further I'm afraid. Viewers may be interested in a interview with Dr Robitaille of Sky Scholar.
I think the idea of a big bang is wrong if you include space but correct if your talking about matter. It's Apple's and oranges not the same. A hot dense start ok our blacksphere was our big bang and every galaxie has had a big bang . They all didn't happen at the same time. Everything in space is moving nothing is still so what's making everything have to move. What moves our solar system around the star the star. What moves our star around the milkyway the blacksphere at the center. So what's moving the milkyway around in space perhaps were moving around our bigbang? And in doing so it create the illusion of expansion because of the vast distances. The milkyway could in fact be part of an enormous arm of the mother galaxie that we can't observe because we're in it. Size doesn't matter in space it's only relative to our surroundings
FIRST POINT
I have some Concerns about Looking at Very Very Old Images in that the Current Vision of that May not be the True Appearance at the Time of Image Creation. In other Words the Image is Likely to have Changed with Time and Consequence.
SECOND POINT
Obviously What We See Via a Number of Methods of The Universe. This May Only be a Very Very Small Part of the True Universe. In Other Words We Have Absolutely No Proof that What we See is The Entire True Universe.
THIRD POINT
We Must Acknowledge the Unknowns of the Distant Past. In that The Sciences of Space, Earth, Life May Never Never be Capable of Figuring Out Something which has been Destroyed by the Actions of Time. Hence Science is Pursuing Futility on Some Issues.
FOURTH POINT
Yes as some of Us have Pointed Out. The Fact that Time is Infinite is a Major Flaw to The Bing Bang Theory. The Theory that Time is Infinite Backwards and Forwards is Far More Sound than the Big Bang Theory.
FIFTH POINT
I am Very Very Sceptical about the Back Ground Radiation and what that Indicates.
SIXTH POINT
Evolution can Not be Proven to be a Constant. Or Proven to Apply to All of the Known Universe.
SEVENTH POINT
Thankyou to these People of Knowledge for putting Their Theories and Effort into the Public Arena.
True Human Wisdom.
Again Thankyou.
Tip: learn english before dwelling into astrophysics.
@@ferdinandkraft857 Tip : Get Smarter before Commenting on My Comments.
The four Maha kalpas which mean the four great Era of the universe. And scientist adapted 4 four great Era into five great Era.
Buddhist version:
1 Primordial Era.
2 Stelliferious Era.
3 Degeneration Era.
4 Dark Era.
Scientists version:
1 primordial Era.
2 Stelliferious Era.
3 Degeneration Era.
4 Black hole Era.
5 Dark Era.
Maybe spacetime is actually just infinity and the Big Bang occurred at some point in the spacetime infinity. I mean they know that all the matter is expanding but do they know if spacetime is expanding too?
Yes, space is expanding, too. The Big Bang isn't just the spreading out of matter in space, it's the expansion of space itself.
@@philochristos Ok but how do we know that? Can the expansion of spacetime be measured?
@@sinebar Yes, the expansion rate of space has been measured. It's about 72 km/s per megaparsect. I don't know how they figured this out.
@@sinebar Edwin Hubble made the observations in 1925 and was the first to prove that the universe is expanding. He proved that there is a direct relationship between the speeds of distant galaxies and their distances from Earth. This is now known as Hubble's Law
@@tprnbs Yeah I learned that in high school science class.
every creation has a beginning, I think
That looks like the beginning of the universe.
The universe is bigger than just what we think we can see....
Yes much bigger at least 125million times as far as volume is concerned.
@@misterphmpg8106 got any ideas on what's going on in the universe?
Wow! A video with Kuhn NOT asking about god!
Interview with a vampire phycisist
Indeed. He would make an excellent Count Dracula.
To be infinite it has to be cyclical no beginning no ending. Forever creations and distruction. Only sanatan philosophy explain this and satisfyingly.
The fact he is so uncomfortable answering the question is obvious and says a lot. He avoids like a typical politician. A simple yes, no, or I don't know is all that's required. He is putting a lot of effort into not being honest.
How possible is it that what "astrophysicists" call the CMB, isn't, in actuality, what they believe it to be??
Then tell us what it is, genius.
I AM THE MATHEMATICIAN ABSOLUTE INTELLIGENCE.
I prefer to believe in multi universes. Eternal universes that go back for eternity HENCE there was no beginning and there will be no end.
It's much simpler to think that way. An eternal universe needs no explanation what so ever.
And consciousness is also eternal and does not die.
END OF DEBATE.
You're probably correct. It would certainly explain a lot.
@ProdigyOG3 consciousness is not produced in the brain - that's impossible - but i'd say it is more "welcomed" or "received" into the brain. a working partnership so to speak. metaphorically speaking.
i believe when we die our consciousness returns from whence it came...ie the universe.
Is immortality possible in reality?
No. Next question please.
@@Tom_Quixote Wrong! God is.
Universe begin when quantum field expand tiny gram / gravity singulatity. However, multiverse quantum field may be steady state.
Whoever thought of the big bang forgot to mention it's a theory! The first second of time?! Come on, we can't know this stuff. We were burdened with unknowing, keep us on our toes!
Interesting.. how big was the universe at the age of 1 second? Was it already this big or lets say the size of our solar system maybe? Just trying to imagine it :)
Or maybe just the size of a moon?
what was outside it ? Now that's more weird .
when space started itself....what was outside universe ?
@@starmanstarman576 knowledge leaves you when you start to think about it,
interesting to think about. Interesting question also. What makes you so curious?
@@starmanstarman576 if there is only one universe then it's everything that is, so nothing is outside
Universe, logically, has a beginning. but how it began. Does it began on its own ???
Or it was intervened from outside
The Universe may even begin in the future. The sequence of creation can be compiled in the future, via time travel.
Genesis 1: "In the beginning God created ..." written 3 thousand years ago
Are you surprised that myths originated several millennia ago?
You give a Entity so much power that it can create an Universe or any object as big as universe without ever asking how could something attain an state of mind or what ever you want to say to ever create something like this which is beyond what we we can grasp at this time.
Humans will one find the source/theory of everything and Religion would be the first to be dead.
And the sumerians creation myth is from over 5000 years ago. And it proves nothing. Just like All the others.
Scientists thought for hundreds of years, that our universe is static and eternal, yet the single most important religious book starts with the sentence above. It should make you think not me. Dr. Arno Penzias, Nobel Laureate in Physics: "The best data we have [concerning the Big Bang] are exactly what I would have predicted, had I nothing to go on but the five books of Moses, the Psalms, the bible as a whole" Be open minded for the truth, wherever it leads you. Best wishes.
@@magashegy7301
Religion has a long history of failure too get even the simplest things right. There is no reason too believe any of them have any real answers too the big questions.
Would it help to know that there are three Universes?
Tell me more, tell me more
Do these universes put up a fight?
@@GlossRabban A Universe is created by the division of zero space, but to hold it open takes a massive amount of power. I have no idea what you mean by putting up a fight.
No, it wouldn't.
@@GlossRabban grease.... Wapbamalooma
@@jasonemryss Exactly me fellow person of culture. I salute you:)
2nd
If you think really Hard about it. That kinda makes you First too. Because you were the First to be second. 😁 ✌️
@@GlossRabban hahahah...thx for your inspiration.well said
@@rationalbelief4451 "Always Look on the Bright Side of Life" 😉
_Other Guy on the cross next to Brian_
@@GlossRabban i will try bro.thank u
Everything has a beginning and an end, except for the One who creates ;-)
Sorry, I don't believe in Santa Claus
@@Tom_Quixote No worries, what do you believe in?
BINGO!
Alsa Raad+
You probably need to back that claim up with some evidence.
@@fatmaramadan6928 good call Fatma. Just give me a tiny little bit of time.
It has a beginning but it is also it’s end. It is eternal, anything existing, even the fabric of space creates an unbalanced effect with the vacuum of the void and it keeps it going continuously forever.
Everything is just an Balance , Like everything has an Opposite. Something has to start somewhere else Nothing would be considered an defined rule. As you said, Universe would go to be infinite but it has to start somewhere.
Also, Buy your camera guy a new lens he has massive purple vignetting lol
in other words, says the scientist, our beginning was a MIRACLE that "scientists" can't really explain with "science" alone
what caused the big bang?
No idea...
Do you know?
if i did i would not have asked,
@@solarvoodoo3168
Good ...
Then we both don’t know
What caused your birth ?
@@solarvoodoo3168 God did it.
Allow me one Miracle and I will explain you everything else. Pl don't ask me the Absolute Nothingness if at all it is possible from which everything else sprouted out. Between the Beginingless and the Endless I have a lot to say.
It depends on the meaning of the word OUR. When human beings were not arrived, the universe was there but not fit for human growth.
Utter nonsense! The fact that the universe evolved it doesn't imply that there was a beginning. What happened before the BB is a perfectly legit question, and it has nothing to do with time. And, i don't know how old is this video, but today is not at all generally accepted that the BB was the begging. Many cosmologists, like N. Turok, don't accept this. Even though in these videos the host generally keeps an open mind, in this one he seemed to fell into the classic BB mambo jumbo.
Is he always smiling
Kudos -- 444 Gematria -- 🗽
The universe had a beginning, therefore a cause. thanks, Martin Rees, for confirming God's existence.
Literally nothing that he said confirms the existence of a god.
haha... not really. Gods existence is a manmade concept. Rees discussed nothing of it. Pay more attention and learn something.
@@optikon2222 it suffices that he confirmed that most probably the universe had a beginning.
The Kalaam leads to the God of the Bible
czcams.com/video/HOcACl_tJ2c/video.html
1:08 Properties of the first cause
5:11 Event causation or Agent causation?
8:00 How can a mind exist in a timeless dimension, trigger a Transition from timelessness to time?
13:12 How can a mind exist without a body beyond the universe?
15:06 How could God have created the universe without time?
16:11 Is claiming that God is eternal, special pleading?
18:06 Properties of the first cause
30:29 Philosophical and scientific considerations match with the biblical account about the origin of the Universe
30:53 End notes
The universe had a beginning, therefore a cause
czcams.com/video/g9UMDiiE0kY/video.html
1:15 The claim: Something cannot come from nothing does not need to be proven
3:15 Virtual particles do not come from absolutely nothing but require a quantum vacuum
7:36 Premise two: The universe began to exist
9:35 Scientific reasons to conclude that the universe has a beginning
16:32 Further scientific evidence why the universe cannot be past eternal
18:35 Philosophical reasons why the universe nor quantum effect potentials cannot be past eternal
Aquinas showed us that the attributes of a true God are logically deduced. Properties of the first cause:
1. Supernatural in nature, (As it exists outside and beyond of the natural physical universe),
2. Uncaused, beginningless, and eternal (self-existent, as it exists without a cause, outside of time and space, besides the fact that infinite regress of causes is impossible. ),
3. Omnipresent & all-knowing (It created space and is not limited by it),
4. Changeless ( Change depends on physical being )
5. Timeless ( Without physical events, there can be no time, and time began with the Big Bang )
6. Immaterial (Because He transcends space and created matter),
7. Spaceless ( Since it created space)
8. Personal (The impersonal can’t create personality, and only a personal, free agent can cause a change from a changeless state )
9. Enormously Powerful ( Since it brought the entire universe, space-time and matter into existence )
10. Necessary (As everything else depends on it),
11. Absolutely independent and self-existent ( It does not depend on a higher causal agency to exist otherwise there would be infinite regress which is impossible )
12. Infinite and singular (As you cannot have two infinities),
13. Diverse yet has unity (As all multiplicity implies a prior singularity),
14. Intelligent (Supremely, to create everything, in special language, complexity, factories and machines),
15. Purposeful (As it deliberately created everything with goals in mind),
An agent endowed with free will can have a determination in a timeless dimension to operate causally at a (first) moment of time and thereby to produce a temporally first effect
1. God is supernatural in nature Acts 17:24-25
2. God is uncaused, beginningless, and eternal 1 Timothy 1:17
3. God is omnipresent & all-knowing Psalm 139:7-12; Jeremiah 23:24
4. God is unchanging Malachi 3:6
5. God is immaterial (spirit) John 4:24
6. God is personal John 4:24, 1 Thessalonians 5:18, Isaiah 25:1, Isaiah 63:7, Psalm 78:1, 1 Chronicles 16:8, Micah 4:12, Job 29:4, 2 Corinthians 13:14
7. God is enormously Powerful Genesis 17:1
8. God is timeless Revelation 1:8
9. God is necessary Genesis 1:1
10. God is omniscient ( All-knowing ) Psalm 147:4-5
11. God is absolutely independent and self-existent Isaiah 46:9
12. God is One, yet He exists in three persons Matthew 3:16-17
13. God is extraordinarily intelligent Jeremiah 32:17
14. God is all-understanding Psalm 147:5
15. God is purposeful
@@reasonandsciencecatsboardcom I see we have an insane asylum patient who has accessed someone’s devise.
@@readynowforever3676 Namecalling is the lowest form of discoure, the last refuge of those who cannot disprove an opposing point of view. The Internet is dominated by the crude, the uninformed, the immature, the smug, the untalented, the repetitious, the pathetic, the hostile, the deluded, the self-righteous, and the shrill. Usually, the tool of the loser of a debate will resort to insulting, [Arostotle] Basic rule of thumb: When someone with opposite views starts calling you names, it means he has nothing left to debate against your argument. It also means: The proponent of intelligent design / creationism just won the debate. Namecalling serves no useful purpose and is, therefore, illogical My advice: Do not make any explicit adhom, calling me names, like a troll, stupid, idiot, religious nutter etc. , or accusing me of not thinking, or not using my brain. - Do also not try to attack my education, ( asking to go back to school, taking a science class etc. ) or ask for my credentials. It adds nothing to your case, nor does it make naturalism become more compelling.
I could try to come up with a very convincing lie why the earth does or doesn’t have a beginning but I’ll leave the story telling to the genius’s. Lol
The ultimate source of existence, whatever you call it, has to transcend time. It can have no beginning, nor can it have an ending. The source of all is not a thing that can be physically examined, or pointed to on a map. The Universe itself can have no location, being the source of all locations. The Universe can have no outside, nor can it have an inside.
Could be universe begin with big bang when gravity start, and end with big whimper (chill) when gravity finish.
Truth lol
Anyone interested in real ideas should check out the following videos:
czcams.com/play/PLJ4zAUPI-qqqj2D8eSk7yoa4hnojoCR4m.html
Well, the energy required too create the universe had too come from somewhere. It couldn't just come into existence from nowhere. Or even have existed forever. So finding the source of this seemingly unlimited energy seems too be the biggest block to an potential answer.
The how and why of our reality will never be answered. Leaving room for our imagination too fill
in the gaps. The deeper we look the deeper it gets.
I like your comment "The deeper we look the deeper it gets."
@@johnbrzykcy3076
👍
Why do you assume conservation of energy?
@@ferdinandkraft857
That's a pretty basic law. And breaking that law seems highly unlikely. At least in this universe. And that's all we have too work with.
@@thomasridley8675 General Relativity doesn't impose energy conservation.
A society grows great when old men plant trees in whose shade they shall never sit. This guy has no interest in planting trees.
Just words and fake maths.
My mother told me that the bing bang was just one of billions of such events. If we could see outside of our universe we would see bing bangs occuring all over the place. As the universe is infinite we will probably never know every detail but only speculate on the total picture. If i had my way the dark matter of our universe would be chocolate pudding and i could enjoy it for a billion years. Dont think to hard about the universe. Earth wont exist for too much longer as mankind will self destruct or the sun will go super nova. Dont hold your breath but mankind wont exist in the future. We have enough nuclear weapons to kill everything 100 times over. In the long term there will be no more mcdonalds. When that happens you know we are kaput.
mike Only one Universe can exist as infinite because you can only repeat your first belief of the history of existence infinitely, but look on the bright side you'll get to experience your mother infinitely because infinite never changes it just always first believes it exist.
He actually thinks he can test the age of the universe based on earth's conditions today? We don't even know if the same physics that we have here are constant in the entire universe. They can never prove those things no matter how many theories.
Yes good point, I've been saying this to physicists as well, they never respond, i agree they make many HUGE assumptions in the formulation of our current model of the universe, and the messy theory of the big bang and particularly inflation which seems to be nothing more than patchwork for a flawed theory.
There is, though, Hoyle's work and the theories of the formation of the heavier elements in stars and supernovae, and the relative abundance of those elements relative to each other, that theory seems to be strongly consistent with a universe starting from a hot dense amorphous big bang.
When are these people going to get real jobs!
God did it.
Yes of course easy answer for easy minds so they wont think beyond it.
@@ManiBalajiC I didn’t witness any of the creation I only believe what God says in the book.
Nothing convincing about that hypothesis
@@rotorblade9508 nothing convincing for those who are determined not to be convinced.
@@tomorrowmaynevercome3171 you have seen god writing books for jews , christians , hindus , muslims . While your god stays in hiding making you to convince people about his existence when he chose to be in hiding.
nobody knows, and never will defund the scientists
Proverbs 8
22 The LORD created me at the beginning of his work, the first of his acts of old.
23 Ages ago I was set up, at the first, before the beginning of the earth.
24 When there were no depths I was brought forth, when there were no springs abounding with water.
25 Before the mountains had been shaped, before the hills, I was brought forth;
26 before he had made the earth with its fields, or the first of the dust of the world.
27 When he established the heavens, I was there, when he drew a circle on the face of the deep,
28 when he made firm the skies above, when he established the fountains of the deep,
29 when he assigned to the sea its limit, so that the waters might not transgress his command, when he marked out the foundations of the earth,
30 then I was beside him, like a master workman; and I was daily his delight, rejoicing before him always,
31 rejoicing in his inhabited world and delighting in the sons of men.
In other words, the Universe had a beginning.
Is this suposed to prove anything?
Then He turned to the heaven when it was smoke... (Quran, 41:11)
He is the Originator of the heavens and the earth.
When He decrees a thing, He does only say to it, ‘Be!’ and it is. (2:118)
Do not the disbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were a closed-up mass (ratqan), then We opened them out (fafataqnahuma)? And We made from water every living thing. Will they not then believe? (21:31)
And We have built the heaven with might and We continue to expand it indeed. And the Earth We have spread out, and how excellently do We spread it out! (51:48-49)
“Remember the day when We shall roll up the heavens like the rolling up of written scrolls by a scribe. As We began the first creation, so shall We repeat it - a promise binding upon Us; We shall certainly perform it.” (21:105)
@@GlossRabban The false prophet Mohammed wouldn't have had a following without copying what the religious Catholics told him.
@@NightBazaar Of course it did. Did you think all this came from nothing?
@@BradHolkesvig The story of Jesus wouldnt exist if it werent for the same story first told by the Egyptians thousands of years prior
Atheists hates "the beginning". Reminds them of Genesis 1:1. Carl Sagan, Fred Hoyle, Bertrand Russel are embarrassingly wrong.
Now... Can we cut out the baby Jesus questions?