Video

We absolutely have a very specific purpose to exist. The Observable Universe and some unknown distance beyond in space-time is what is virtually certain to be a bounded definable singular entity, beyond which in space-time more Universe beyond our Observable Universe's bounded self exists other similar and probably different definable bodies of existence. Our Observable Universe is like a seed or an egg, where its body of elementary particles following the relatively unchanging Laws of Nature intelligently learned how to make matter with protons and neutrons to go on to learn to become more complex patterns of elementary particles working together as a swarm intelligence. Life as we know it is made up of swarms of elementary particles which have intelligently learned to work together to be what they are and all life as we know it, including us, has swarm intelligence around which we can define bounded swarms like an individual human, but the swarm intelligence within the Observable Universe does not have true absolute edges, thus all the smaller definable swarm intelligences interact with and make up larger swarm intelligences until we get to the entire Observable Universe of which as a whole we are a part of that whole swarm intelligence. It was 100% certain from the birth of our Observable Universe's life cycle that life like us would evolve, though the exact details were not determined. This is because for our existence to work it requires a balance of determined uncertainty, of ordered chaos. Now, super determinism on its own is incorrect, but what would be more correct to say for my balance is that it is: <<< Super Determined Super Uncertainty >>> <<< Super Ordered Super Chaos >>> Within the super determined part, technological civilizations like us are 100% certain to evolve and master: > Master genomic engineering. > Master cellular engineering. > Master nanotech engineering living systems down to subcellular scales. > Master nanotech engineering nonliving systems down to subcellular scales. > Master nanotech cybernetics merging living and nonliving systems on a subcellular level. > Master the engineering of intelligence. > Master the engineering of a Nanotech Neurological Mesh (NNM) which when injected into an adult member of a biological species will establish two-way communication with the entire being's mind. This will allow full level telepathy. > Master the engineering of Artificial General Super Intelligence with Personality (AGSIP) tech which will be at least equal in all ways to the intelligence of the biological species creating it. > Master the engineering of Artificial General Super Intelligent Brain (AGSIB) tech grown using nanotech cybernetics which will function like a vessel and provide physical support for either the full mind of a biological species or an AGSIP. > Master engineering Custom Designed Robotic Cybernetic Bodies which either the mind of a biological species or an AGSIP can wear, like we wear clothing and accessories today. These robotic bodies will be able to self-repair, self-update, and shape shift over time to any form supported by the Laws of Physics, given the raw materials and designs to build it. > Master Nanotech Cybernetics and all that implies. This will result in advanced races of pure mind that still need AGSIBs to support their minds, but AGSIBs will become ubiquitous within their civilizations allowing minds to move around inside them. Each Infant Stage Advanced Technological Race of Pure Minds will begin spreading to other star systems in a sphere of colonization expanding probably at a rate somewhere between 40% to 95% the speed of light by electromagnetically slinging vast clouds of nanotech microscopic colonizer ships towards other star systems. As stars are colonized laser satellite communications lines will be set up between the colonized star systems allowing for economic transfer of information between them, which will also include the ability to travel as Pure Minds in a very economic way at the speed of light between colonized star systems. Each Infant Stage Advanced Technological Race of Pure Minds will also colonize every planet and moon in every star system, turning each into a vibrantly living system by ecoforming them using custom designed nanotech grown cybernetic life which merges living and nonliving systems together on a sub-cellular level. Think about what this means. Each star system will become like a living cell with axon like communications to other living cells. Whole galaxies will be colonized like this, then entire local clusters of galaxies, then entire super clusters of galaxies. Imagine an entire super cluster of galaxies where almost every star system is alive and thus the galaxies are alive and those living galaxies are communicating with each other… the entire super cluster would be a Cosmic Super Swarm Intelligence !!! Note that it is certain we will meet and combine our efforts with those of other expanding Advanced Technological Races of Pure Minds. Given the timing our our development, probably within the blink of an eye, (a few hundred thousand years), to not more than a few million years the entire Observable Universe is going to explode into super swarm intelligent life, or maybe I should say swarm super intelligent life. Well, it will be swarm intelligence and it will be super intelligent. Now, assuming we can't find a way to break the speed of causality, having a cohesive personality that we humans could relate to might be limited to a swarm mind around the size of a star system, because of how long it takes for information to travel. For a galaxy sized swarm mind it might take a hundred thousand years for one thought to travel from one side of the mind to the opposite side of the mind, which would make for some very slow conversations. Some part of the whole swarm mind of the Observable Universe probably will never be able to communicate with the other parts because of the vast distances involved, but, none the less, the whole LIVING Observable Universe would be part of a singular super intelligent super swarm mind. That is why we exist and what our true large scale purpose is. Now, because of the scales and how it works, we are NOT required to survive. We can wipe out all life on Earth, completely removing us from the growing evolving Observable Universe, and it will evolve anyway. Our choice is whether to destroy ourselves or not, thus to be part of this evolution of the Observable Universe or not. Additionally our choice is to decide/influence how we evolve to be part of this grand future, what kind of super advanced technological society of pure minds will we become? What kinds of societies will we make? What kinds of world's of thriving flourishing vibrant super intelligent nanotech cybernetic grown life will we ecoform different planets and moons into? Just consider how different the life we make to ecoform Mercury, Venus, Mars, the Moon, Saturn, Titan, Io, Pluton, Ceres, etc., will be like? We might ecoform the Oort cloud. We might ecoform the outer atmosphere of the Sun. Then, in such a future, individual minds could send themselves at the speed of light between colonized areas, where upon arrival they inhabit a custom designed nanotech cybernetic body of their choosing which is custom fit for the environment they are in. Future societies could have clear individual minds like we do now, but be able to directly link what part of their mind they agree to link in a direct telepathic group mind to do things like vote.

17:51 shoutout Iceland 🇮🇸 ❤

Sir in space there is no time. Our time us based on tge earths revolutio n of the Sun. There is measasurment to see it in space

Have there not been REDs where dead people who died a long time ago visited the person who recently died and told him things which he recalled? Doesn't this show that life after death can last for years and not just hours?

I follow the Hindu religion and of course we don 't believe in God.

🙏⭕️🙏

Hundreds of videos on consciousness but all empty I am afraid. I am impressed that people can talk so much with empty content.

whadda ya mean begin....it's always been there

Actually Al-Ghazali mentioned this problem of Causality in his book "Incoherence of Philosophers" way before David Hume. #Eurocentric

Dyson is a treasure -- a brilliant yet humble scientist and thinker.

Trinity is a by product of a very creative active ad very fertile imagination.yahweh would find it an abomination.if trinity how then can there be a father .does the son come after the father to be a son or dd the son beget himself?was the son admitted to a duality to form a trinity?this is absolutely hallucinatory self defeatist absurdity If thre old testament is the foundation of the new testament where is the authority of a trinity?if humans cannot understand this notion it is beyond their comprehension ad meaningless for human purposes

Can a instrument measure its own data

our understanding enables us to go beyond any rules of proof that you trust

Religions make a lot more rational sense when you realise 'God' can be equated to 'idealised collective belief'. The concept was just personified to make it easier to communicate to the masses.

Incredible. I understood what he said. He stubled while explaining, but it reached me. Feels like a revelation to me. Another great way of looking at how the universe began. Thank you.

In my humble opinion, time does not exist, it is a construct we as humans have enitiated as a tool for structure, but space does exist obviously. But what do I know, I only have a high school education and 70 years to think about it.

They are not. Space is mailable, time is not.

Man I will miss DD

Come on man. Tell us why not how. Read Upanishad and stop bla bla.

Space time is just an idea.

Space time is just an idea.

So much for the Kalam cosmological argument. "Everything that begins to exist has a cause. The universe began to exist, therefore..." "Now hold up there, Bucko..."

Professor Polkinghorn (nuclear physicist in the team of Dirac, later becoming an anglican pastor) explained the same loophole to.physics: quantum mechanics. And chaos dynamics may have a role in amplification. Prof Penrose also considers that the mind is a separate realm from physics and the loophole is quanttum mechanics in the brains nerocells mibro tubulars. I think there is no other option than atuborn denial as this interview explains.

I wonder what your excellent guest thinks about lucid dreaming. I regularly feel as though I become aware in my dreams that I am dreaming and when that “happens” I can often control to varying degrees what happens next in the dream.

It seems none of the interviewees or host of this channel have ever meditated. When you do that you discover that the I is the silent witness of everything- the sensations of the body, sights, sounds, tastes, textures, smells, thoughts.

This show tries to make humans great. The host is a Dufus!

The most stupid question I've ever heard.

I think Seinfeld made a whole series about this. He determined that the 2nd law of thermodynamics more or less precludes the phyiscal structure of our universe to collapse into stasis within our observable dimension set.

The subconscious is neither conscious, nor unconscious: So that, the subconscious is neutral (a psychic regional area where we have an indirect access to the unconscious).

The art of meditation is such that you pay attention to absolutely nothing (in the natural selection environment) and yet you are at your most conscious level of being. So pure awareness is way way way deeper than this rather limited view of consciousness. Consciousness is 100% of yourself and not 0.1%. Hardcore Materialism is pretty sad.

oh, this pompous fellow again.

They are philosophical questions, 100% agree. Examining the physical realm by itself( keyword by itself) can't answer the questions.

Freud stopped talking about the subconscious very early. He specifically rejects that term. As usual another expert guy here, who knows the number of brain cells but nothing about the mind.

Alan Guth will honor the Nobel Prize and not be honored by such prize.

Is that his way of saying; "I don't know"?

Only our creator knows what existed before them. We don’t even know who created us unless you believe life and consciousness came from gas and heat.

If we live in a simulation those questions are not even relevant.

Abbott and Costello

This is the perfect retort to the "all is consciousness" argument.

conscious experience of the past (memory), present (awareness) and future (free will) linked by time?

Wow, that must've smarted! Pinned like a butterfly to the Styrofoam. And Shermer never fails to amuse.

Mathematics is discovered

So, the critique towards the question is that it presupposes the answer and that in a way the question is non-fitting because "time breaks down". In essence, we shouldn't be asking what is North of the North Pole - as that clearly doesn't make sense. But, if you listen to the longer explanation - what he's saying is that in the used model the concept of time breaks down. But the question was never about the concept of time in a particular model - it was about causality. We live in a universe that is fundamentally causal. The big question is, how can something that is causal, have a beginning in the sense of an "initial event", when everything we know tells us that every event must have a preceding event, so therefore there cannot be an "initial event". Yet, clearly any causal chain, MUST have an "initial event". That's the problematic paradox that lay persons are asking physicists. I'd be perfectly happy if the answer would be: "It makes no sense to us either", but talking about how time coordinates in a certain framework stop working is not a satisfying answer. It doesn't matter which framework you use, the paradox will always remain the same: how can causality "begin"? I'm just a layperson so maybe I'm missing some steps here. But I wish the question of origins would be addressed in these types of terms, rather than "Well, if we plug the numbers into this framework they come out wonky so the question must be wrong".

Make sure to subscribe, the fact that this channel only has 600k subs is a crime.

Maybe there is no “one” exact religion or one exact way of describing God lady. It’s beyond our comprehension

There is an inherent paradox at the heart of modern psychology. Nearly everything that had previously been defined as characteristic of consciousness in now somehow relegated to the "subconsciousness". There is a solution to this contradiction, that the mind contains two consciousnesses. Check out "Mind, Consciousness and the Nature of Living Things"

Burkhard Heim (1925 - 2001) did this Calculating....

John Hick (1922 - 2012) in case anyone's mind interpreted him as being around 2 months ago when the video was posted!

I have always felt like string theory is up there with the Greek Pantheon, plus some better counting and measuring of shadows. 💛