Motorweek Video of the 2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse - Check out more car reviews at www.motorweek.com - read honest reviews and check out specs bound4love.com
I love this generation of Eclipse. I worked at a Mitsubishi dealer several years back , they sold well at first from 06 to 08 until the economy crashed. The V6s were fast , capable of mid 14s in the1/4 mile on a good track. But they were nose heavy and pushed in turns. After driving several Eclipses I bought a Certified Preowned mid level Eclipse SE model with the 2.4 Mivec 4 motor because it had the GT suspension and wheels and cost less. They actually handled better than the GTs because of it having roughly 50/50 weight distribution. It wasn’t as fast as a Gt but it was a lot of fun! Great sound system too, Drove the heck out of it for a year, then traded up to a family sedan due to newborns. These were beautiful cars in person! Bring em back Mitsubishi!
phoenix21studios Yes . Even the 2.4 4 banger could run 15.7 on a good day, I used to sell em and read all the online reviews. MotorWeek uses an old uneven test track and just average drivers.
This car understeers so much in the corners during my test drive back in March. I then drove the Mazda MX-5 Miata next and suddenly felt as if God had rescued me from the Eclipse's horrible understeer hell. Plus, the engine bay is prone to rusts. Serveral Eclipses I looked at had rusts in their engine bay. What a shame.
@Footloose301 well what color did you get it in? I gurantee if you got in black it would have been a panty dropper lol... thats the only color it looks great in. I'm considering buying a used 2006 GT V6 right now in Black... with only 33,000 miles... it looks badass, only in black though :P
I bought one new in 2006 and it has been a pain in my ass since. People kept rear ending me - I have had the reaer bumper replaced 3 times. At first, no one had ever seen it since it was a nice body style and I have the orange paint. I would park in the last row in a Wal Mart parking lot and 5 minute slater, there would be someone parked right next to me despite hundreds of closer spots. In 92K miles: cat coverter, timing belt, water pump, valve replace, three O2 sensors, cant get aligned.
Good review. Okay car. I bought a 2007 GTV6 with all the options and liked the test drive and power. However, I had it for a week and I was able to give it a good test drive without the salesman and I wasn't happy. It's slow as hell and handles like a boat. I ultimately decided to pay a bit more per month and got a Nissan 370Z. It's a shit load faster, a lot better handling mostly due to RWD, and overall it's a panty dropper. Nobody gave me a nice compliment when I brought home the Eclipse. Nea
motorweek cant drive at all, the manual is very easy to shift between gears with the power always being there, 2nd/3rd gear pulls hard and well. This car is rated at mid to high 5sec 60 times which shows they cant drive
I own one of these, and the clutch *is* soft. It's very difficult to get those 5ish 0-60s. The car can do it, but if you give it even just a little too much juice on launch, the clutch just won't bite until you completely get off the gas and it'll burn out after failing enough times. If you upgrade your clutch at the service interval, it's much easier to do. The stock clutch was not made for drag strip runs and launches.
Kevin Cruz I can vouch for that. Absolutely toasted my stock clutch on the last drag night of the season. Stage 4 six-puck, Luk DMF & Quaife LSD should fix that tho ;)
I'm pretty sure this was there worse selling car. I thank they thought it was going to be a good seller and it failed terribly. I thank there about 3 maybe 4 of these within like 300 mile radiance from the town I live in.
I love this generation of Eclipse. I worked at a Mitsubishi dealer several years back , they sold well at first from 06 to 08 until the economy crashed. The V6s were fast , capable of mid 14s in the1/4 mile on a good track. But they were nose heavy and pushed in turns. After driving several Eclipses I bought a Certified Preowned mid level Eclipse SE model with the 2.4 Mivec 4 motor because it had the GT suspension and wheels and cost less. They actually handled better than the GTs because of it having roughly 50/50 weight distribution. It wasn’t as fast as a Gt but it was a lot of fun! Great sound system too, Drove the heck out of it for a year, then traded up to a family sedan due to newborns. These were beautiful cars in person! Bring em back Mitsubishi!
So basically, the 4g was selling well until the recession hit, you say, correct?
Gay you traded it
what bothers me is that for being such a big V6 the 3.8 should have put out like 280hp or more.
You should talk shit on Ford getting only 150 out of the Essex 3.8 in the 90s
Perhaps the v6 needed DOHC...
That and it's heavier than shit.
it has 267 horsepower and 261 ft lb of torque six-speed manual spec
Actually in Puerto Rico is a popular engine, they are modifying it and is having great results
Launched correctly these can run 0-60 in 5.5 sec, very impressive
Naw more like 5.7-5.8 at best
5.5 is correct
@@Bigwatchman28 no sir, you are wrong
pssst boys....Try VP octane boost......lol thank me later,,,,,youll be into the 5 flat bruh trust
@J. Dns try automatic amd yes ttjat was before Yokohoma AdbamtSport
first thing i notice with this car is that it has a big ass
+pontiacGXPfan thats what we like, big asses
the car is way faster than 15 seconds wtf
I know right? its 260hp come on its good for low 14s or 14 flat even.
Jaunge It is ! several road tests back then had the V6 at 14.4 at 98 mph on a good track. Good driver, etc
phoenix21studios Yes . Even the 2.4 4 banger could run 15.7 on a good day, I used to sell em and read all the online reviews. MotorWeek uses an old uneven test track and just average drivers.
The ones with the 3.8L V6 are quicker than the Acura NSX and Toyota MR2 Turbo around Suzuka. That's pretty incredible.
trancedsailor link?
Yea right.
Rsx you mean no way nsx
I have an upgraded Eclipse and even I can say there's no way in hell it's quicker than an NSX on the track
This car understeers so much in the corners during my test drive back in March. I then drove the Mazda MX-5 Miata next and suddenly felt as if God had rescued me from the Eclipse's horrible understeer hell. Plus, the engine bay is prone to rusts. Serveral Eclipses I looked at had rusts in their engine bay. What a shame.
@Footloose301 well what color did you get it in? I gurantee if you got in black it would have been a panty dropper lol... thats the only color it looks great in. I'm considering buying a used 2006 GT V6 right now in Black... with only 33,000 miles... it looks badass, only in black though :P
EDIT: I mean this August 2011 is when the Eclipse goes out.
I can sort of agree with that.
Maybe that's why Mitsu's sales of the Eclipse were sagging in it's final years.
R.I.P.
I bought one new in 2006 and it has been a pain in my ass since. People kept rear ending me - I have had the reaer bumper replaced 3 times. At first, no one had ever seen it since it was a nice body style and I have the orange paint. I would park in the last row in a Wal Mart parking lot and 5 minute slater, there would be someone parked right next to me despite hundreds of closer spots. In 92K miles: cat coverter, timing belt, water pump, valve replace, three O2 sensors, cant get aligned.
AngelsTakeMe2Heaven ppl always park near me and swing open their doors at my car I don’t get it
Never buy the first year model of any car
Bring back the AWD option.
Definitely ran better than that in a quarter completely stock, at 4500ft DA
yeah, 3g eclipse hit 60 in 6.7 secs
true, but before motorweek tested the 2006 Eclipse, their last Eclipse they tested was the 2003 GTS, which took 8.1 seconds to reach 0 to 60.
Yea like 6.8 stock manual. The automatic 3g gt did 7.1-7.3
Good review. Okay car. I bought a 2007 GTV6 with all the options and liked the test drive and power. However, I had it for a week and I was able to give it a good test drive without the salesman and I wasn't happy. It's slow as hell and handles like a boat. I ultimately decided to pay a bit more per month and got a Nissan 370Z. It's a shit load faster, a lot better handling mostly due to RWD, and overall it's a panty dropper. Nobody gave me a nice compliment when I brought home the Eclipse. Nea
motorweek cant drive at all, the manual is very easy to shift between gears with the power always being there, 2nd/3rd gear pulls hard and well. This car is rated at mid to high 5sec 60 times which shows they cant drive
I own one of these, and the clutch *is* soft. It's very difficult to get those 5ish 0-60s. The car can do it, but if you give it even just a little too much juice on launch, the clutch just won't bite until you completely get off the gas and it'll burn out after failing enough times. If you upgrade your clutch at the service interval, it's much easier to do. The stock clutch was not made for drag strip runs and launches.
Kevin Cruz I can vouch for that. Absolutely toasted my stock clutch on the last drag night of the season. Stage 4 six-puck, Luk DMF & Quaife LSD should fix that tho ;)
Update: yeah I destroyed that clutch too lol
The worst eclipse..
I'm pretty sure this was there worse selling car. I thank they thought it was going to be a good seller and it failed terribly. I thank there about 3 maybe 4 of these within like 300 mile radiance from the town I live in.
NMTHEGAME about 5 at most in my city population 80k
I'm just saying there are tuns of 1996-2004 everywhere and the Mitsubishi lot here is gone under years ago
about 3 or 4 in my area.
They're still everywhere around here. I never see a first or second generation on the road except if I look in my driveway
it had like 4 recalls, ive found a decent amount 100 miles away from me for about 3k. migh consider picking up, reliability is a factor tho.
This was the downfall of Mitsubishi.