Everybody's talking about the ship itself but I'm here just wondering how on earth would the people ever be able to visit any country the ship's visiting. Since, you know, the idea was that people could give up their citizenships. I imagine it's quite difficult to visit a country without a passport.
You do not actually have to give up your citizenship for something like this. Many people hold citizenship in more then one country, and usually you pay taxes depending on where your permanent residence is (determined by where you live the majority of the year).
@@daftwulli6145 not to mention that if you spend 6 months or more living outside your country you don’t have to pay taxes for that year in your country, at least that’s what I’ve been told.
Let’s not forget about the security costs either, that much rich people all concentrated together in a slow moving target in the middle of the ocean is bound to attract a couple of pirates at least
What? Explain yourself or delete your comment. Your saying a bunch of starving ethiopians are going to the middle of the pacific to hold up the biggest ship in the world- with a permanent population? Not to mention the police force the ship would have as well. I don't think it's anything they would need to be concerned about. You know where the pacific is right?
@@istyl2525 Somalia is the location of worry. Pirates are a concern there. All they would need is a few well-placed explosives to take the ship hostage, or make whole ship go boom. Super large ships need lots of fuel and fuel is flammable.
So you're telling me, to avoid paying taxes, some people would like to live on a boat, to pay for accommodation, fuel, electricity, water treatment, post services, security, ship crew, food for that crew, maintaining ship infrastructure, medical facilities, schools, setup up rules of conduct? Good thing those are not taxes.
Yeah and it would still be massively massively cheaper than what they pay in a country. You’re talking about costs that pertain to 60,000 people rather than 330,000,000 people. The rich pay most of the taxes, their tax burden would be like 1/50th of the cost.
i imagine that if such a ship were ever fully built and worked exactly as intended there'd be quite a lot of countries imposing sanction on such a vessel
pff, what do you expect from crazy religious shepperds sitting in caves in far east? hijacking planes with curtain knifes and precisely pilot them into towers? or sinking a ridiculous large vessel? no way! 🙄
Assuming this is possible, which is a fat assumption, this would be the world's largest terrorist attack target. The way the design is now, it would take a lot to sink it, but it would be absolutely possible, and probably not that hard. How many USS Cole style attacks could this withstand? Four men on four different small boats loaded with explosives ramming it at critical points would likely bring this to the bottom of the ocean, and that would be hard to defend against.
@@Nebulasecura You must be stupid if you think I don’t know that. I bet you didn’t know about the numerous terrorist attacks in China performed by the certain Uighur Muslims 🤷🏽♂️ But yet you guys don’t like the camp they made to correct people who are suspected to be a part of the organisations behind the attacks
At this point you might aswell make a cluster of smaller ships that float on the ocean. Maybe somewhere near a geothermaly active area for underwater geothermal power. Add some fish farms and whatnot around it. Viola a tax haven like nothing else and its save from flooding too. I mean until the ship eventually breaks.
Are we sure this isn't actually the original inspiration for Wall-E? That whoever at Pixar hadn't once heard about this thing and that's where the initial seed for the story came from?
I think the worst part of living on this thing is that all of your neighbors would be the kind of people who would move to a big floating island to avoid taxes.
@@edopronk1303 I disagree. I always found people who advocate for a state to take money and do whatever with it to be the most egoistic, selfish and not at all social. Poor people want the money to be given to them, rich people who advocate for it want it as a weapon agains competition. Both groups talk that crap to make them appear as morally superior. Not ever have I found a single person of good character advocate for high taxes.
I can foresee a few small problems with renouncing all of your citizenships to avoid taxes. 1) In most countries your obligation to pay taxes doesn't depend on you being a citizen. 2) Some places don't officially recognise renunciation of citizenship and 3) Even if they do most of them only recognise renunciation if you are citizen of somewhere else. Not if it would make you stateless.
A more realistic idea would be to build several smaller versions of this ship and have them sail in a convoy And of course having ferries to get people to each ship It’s still a floating city just built in more manageable sections
I remember reading about this in a monthly science magazine back in 1999 or 2000. I was in elementary school and still somewhat fond of cruise ships, so there was a fascination to the idea, though I was skeptical about it becoming reality. Through the years since, I don't think I ever heard about it again until this video.
Explains most architecture in these days. 111west57th, 432parkavenue, Burj Khalifa and most buildings in Qatar which are just a greedy inhuman just built up area of their troubling city layout and horrid weather for a city, terrible childish construction, and slavery carried from fathers in Nepal. There's also 700 other glass "art" pieces being shoved into Chicago, Manhattan, San Francisco, Hollywood, Florida, France, London especially, Guangzhou and Shanghai, Seoul, Singapore, and Africa which is a whole entire other tragic story with their oasis city.... their delusional... Wish they could of had their happy moments like america in the 20th century, understanding what having wealth means better than the hellscape they are turning their cities into thanks to immaturity to a surplus of self made choices and the large addition digital technology has plagued our ideals with for a beneficial future. These days, our scientists are just people who used to play on an arcade, and our architects are kids that watched too many scifi movies, a lack of care for are historical background only thinking forward and wanting, instead of what we already have. We don't need a PS5, a virtual reality set, 5G and a Tesla (not as though that is anything impressive), Alexa to tell you the weather, a bot to turn your Christmas tree on, a self driving vehicle is pathetic, uber pickup because the thing you go to meant for easy lazy people called a drive through, wasn't enough apparently, and a fit boy when half of the people today can barely keep fit and usually only wear it as a piece of jewelry because nothing says leisurely like a hot pink artificial band with a ominous glossy black square in the center listing all the things it knows about you.
Honestly, I don't think it's possible for a non-government entity to build a nuclear powered anything? Maybe I am wrong, but it could be very dangerous for a nuclear power plant to be out in the open without any military protection... Just my thoughts...
@@goonerOZZ That is not an issue when you are designing such a vessel. Building yes. Using yes. Dangerous oh yes but Running a ship of this size on disel is the most insane part. It would need a tanker refilling it constantly just to keep it stable. No wonder it is still in the design stage.
I mean they can dodge taxes but its really because they aren't using any benefits from the taxes (i.e. police, hospitals etc) anyways, so I don't think there's much wrong with that. If the pirates get them, just don't expect any military to help either LOL.
As a Somali pirate, I am really hoping they can overcome any obstacles and get this exciting project afloat soon! Edit: Your fictional solutions to thwart my fictional piracy are all lame. Prepare to be boarded.
@People of China live free and destroy the CCP People of China live in solidarity and prosper under wise leadership of Xi Jinping and destroy libertarian freedom boat with glorious people’s navy.
@People of China live free and destroy the CCP The People's Liberation Army Navy's array of future artificial reefs will gloriously puncture the hull and sink the Tax Dodging Future Dream Boat regardless of how much money the libertarians spend or mercs with money that is in no way a tax.
I went to college to be a naval architect. I distinctly remember sending this guy my resume when I graduated cause I had no standards and I needed a damn job.
I think you may have overlooked the log ships from the 1800s early 1900s. They were enormous. They basically just used huge chains to make absolutely humongous, ocean going log rafts. Mind boggling in scale.
"I chose the impossible. I chose... Rapture, a city where the artist would not fear the censor, where the scientist would not be bound by petty morality, where the great would not be constrained by the small! And with the sweat of your brow, Rapture can become your city as well."
An underwater city called Rupture? Seriously? What's next -- maybe he renames his Freedom Ship the Titanic, or designs a yacht called the Mary Celeste, or a spaceship called the Challenger ...
@@seanbigay1042 It was a typo, intentional or not. Obviously he meant Rapture, which has a completely different meaning. Rupture, an instance of breaking or bursting suddenly and completely. Rapture, a feeling of intense pleasure or joy.
I have to imagine there would be security. And seeing as they're staying in international waters, that security can have machine guns and surface-to-water missiles.
@@Joemamahahahaha821 you think he would know? No one knows because the thing hasn't been fucking built, although i'd have to imagine quite a few, not just for somali pirates but for onboard pirates too, the thing would have it's own police dpt
Could you imagine sentencing yourself to life on a prison ship? The only way to avoid US taxes is to transfer all of your money out of the country without the government noticing and then renouncing your citizenship. With no passport you can't leave that ship, you are stuck on it for life.
“I shouldn’t have to pay taxes!!! 🤬” “Oh, I’m just gonna charge you guys a little HOA fee to keep the ship running. You totes understand, right? 😇” -the douchebag who designed this ship
Let's not forget the physics of trying steer/stop this thing. The forces involved would be immense. It seems to me that most of the problems with this project could be solved by having multiple, smaller ships instead of a single, enormous ship.
This seems like a great idea to get seized by any nation with any navy at all. There are a lot of nations that would like to nationalize something that expensive, or take the passengers captive for ransom or tax. And since none of them would have citizenship, it wouldn’t even cause a diplomatic incident.
Eh retirees do it all the time, its not that bad if u think about it. Hotel style living arrangement, movies, pools, gyms, restourants, entertainment all close to u
Yeah traveling the world in luxury continuously without having to pay taxes sounds fucking rough. Also I'm pretty sure this video and the guy who came up with the idea described it...sooooo
I mean I can easily design a spaceship the size of the sun in 5 mins. It takes doing the actual engineering of it to be considered "seriously designed".
@@Omar-if3vd I think the difference here is that it’s actually designed to be physically possible and have a feasible business plan for existing (tax havens and vacations). People would be taking it a lot more seriously if someone like Elon Musk got their name on the project. Colonizing Mars is way crazier and more ambitious than this shit, and somehow people take it seriously.
I believe it is clearly serious in the sense of "Designed with the intent of actually bringing it about," whether or not you believe it's serious in the sense of "Perfectly sane, reasonable, practical, and economical."
@@innosam123 How do you keep your money safe from governments that really want it. The US government puts serious pressure on other country's banking systems when they send the tax man after you.
I wonder what the light manufacturing is for... They're already going to have to import every scrap of food, why not just import all the manufactured stuff as well? Maybe the reason for having it is so that the people who can afford this have some common laborers to exploit in the manner to which they have become accustomed? For some odd reason, by the way, I look at those pictures and the phrase "deathtrap in a fire" comes to mind.
"no taxes but we will need some money every month for upkeep costs, gas, paying the crew etc. and then we'll probably need police and healthcare and your kids will probably want to go to school so we'll need money for that every month, we'll just take a percentage of your income to cover that but no taxes!"
We? Yes, there would be upkeep and fuel costs. Crew costs too. Police and fire would need funding, to some extent. Healthcare could be entirely private though. So could schools.
I know right? By paying to live there you're paying to help it run and function. You can call it whatever you want. Technically it would just be called "part of your rent", but hell, call it a snozberry pie if you want, I don't give a shit. Whatever you call it, you're still paying taxes. Oh I just remembered, if you want to tax someone but you dont want to use the word tax you use the word 'fee'. Like how postmates taxes you double, but they split it in half, one is a 'tax' and the other a 'service fee'.
There's also going to develop a huge class divide. As stated, there is a fairly large crew on board. Alot of those "fees" (uh..hm...taxes) would go to their pay, upkeep and support. We all know the nature of the privileged rich and we all know what the nature of their "utopia" will be.
@randomguy8196 What about the workers on this ship? They would have to live in it as well. It's almost like you can't have a society of just billionaires because its poor people who do the actual work that keeps a society running. So fuck them I guess? Well they tried that in the gilded age and guess what happened? labor riots happened.
@@jokerplays6139 did you watch the video? That would be just the investment to build it, I’m sure once it’s built a more reasonable price would be generated.
How would that work in an emergency, if the ship held that many people, a rescue effort would require so many ships it would be unreal. Not to mention that the planned route went through loads of bad areas, Cape of good home, the sea near Somalia.
I see two major flaws: either make the ship shorter to fit at least the Suez Canal or make it longer to accomodate a full private jet enabled double runway (for the rich CEO on board) to land some modern jet planes on.
This ship would make for a great setting for a disaster movie. Imagine 100 000 people, most of whom shady Wall Street bankers with no real life skills, all rushing to the lifeboats at the same time.
I feel like I saw a movie with a similar plot a few years ago. It didn't go too well for the rich people. Or the poor people. Or... anyone, really, now that I think about it.
A pirate commando boards the ship and take command of it. They demand a ransom of $100 000 000 for everyone aboard or they'll detonate a nuclear device in the middle of it.
That's only the preliminary cost estimate. The conception phase is not finished yet, and it probably nearing the billion. That's the kind of project where the actual costs can get to 1000% to 10 000% over the original estimates.
@@sasugage2168 The USS Gerald R. Ford cost about the same as HK's W Kowloon railway station plus its underground HSR link between in & mainland China I recall
I’d imagine that maintaining such a super massive ship would be difficult, and engineering it’s structure to be hospitable for civilians would be a nightmare.. then imagine the noro virus outbreaks on the ship
I love how this entire project was designed to avoid paying taxes but the residents would still have to regularly pay money to the ruling body of the country in order to keep it functioning. I think there's a name for that
And don't forget their own mercenary army to protect them. Just imagine one day their mercenaries decide they'll be the new government. They can't demand the mercenaries because they don't accept any external law, so not law system to defend them. That will be beautiful.
@@ejethan123 Well if you choose to emigrate into a different country that would also be completely voluntary and consensual. And that's basically what that ship is intended to be, its own country.
Im amazed he didnt talk about the massive threat something like this would just have from the ocean itself, extreme storms and waves ect have a chance to cause massive damage to such a massive money sink.
It'd be cool to work on something like that. Only downside would be rich snobs and I've been dealing with those most of my life. Would definitely let it be out to sea for a few months first to make sure it worked right though lol.
Listen, take it from a Japanese ww2 enthusiast. Building the biggest ship ever isn't necessarily a good thing. We built the biggest and most powerful battleship to ever exist, it was called the IJN Yamato. It truly was a magnificent creature. But unfortunately being the biggest battleship in history makes you really easy to hit so it ended up being sunk. Quite literally the definition of glass cannon. It packs a massive punch but it was also very vulnerable to aerial attacks and torpedos due to its sheer size
Okay, so there are several concerns I have with the project. One, ships need to be able to flex in rough seas. I’m almost certain that something like this would tear itself apart at sea, just based on the limits of the material alone. Two, this thing would disrupt sea traffic ANYWHERE it goes. Even parked out at sea, she would likely block major shipping/commercial routes. Her very presence would leach a port city dry from all the resources she’d need to take on, and all the goods she’s blocked off, each stop. Thirdly, the fuel consumption would be MASSIVE. Modern cargo ships, some of the largest vessels currently in existence, already use about 63,000 gallons of diesel per day. And given that she’s constantly on the move, she doesn’t have any set refueling locations. She could singlehandedly drain an entire port city of diesel, causing shortages in the area for weeks or even months. The sheer volume of resource consumption would likely lead many nations to deny her entry into their waters, meaning that resupplies would be even farther between. There’s a good chance that, after a few consecutive stops denying her entry, she would run out of fuel entirely and be stuck out at sea. Then you’d have to try and get help evacuating 100,000 people from a ship dead in the water. Freedom Ship not only sounds stupid, it is a logistical nightmare.
Do you really think port cities, which are basically Walmarts of the sea, are gonna say "Uh, know, we really do not want to sell everything on our shelves all at once, even when we knew for months that you are coming"? This ship won't work for many reasons that you mentioned, but not the ports thing.
@@dougerrohmer it’s not an issue of selling. They’ll sell to the ship just fine. It’s an issue of, other ships can’t get through to replace the resources it consumes, and it’s draining so much of it that everything else doesn’t get anything. It would cause shortages everywhere it goes. If that creates enough public tension, the city/county might not have a choice but to deny harbor, or they risk an uproar.
@@Nikolai_The_Crazed If the ship physically blocks access, that's one thing. But these things don't happen overnight - they can predict their orders weeks in advance and adjust stock level accordingly, unless their is an international shortage of something maybe.
@@dougerrohmer Well, there is a limit to how much a port can carry. We’re talking about something the size of a literal small city. They don’t have limitless space for cargo, and we’re still talking about a logistics nightmare just to get this thing fueled. The trucks and ships needed to bring more stuff in might not have enough left if a large portion of the diesel is going to a floating city. Because this thing isn’t just supplying for the time being, they’re stocking up in advance in case a trip runs longer than it has to. The largest container ships can hold about 21,000 containers, and that’s considered pushing the limits on what a port can handle in a day. The port in the city of Los Angeles handled about 30,000 containers a day last year, and it’s one of the busiest in the world. And a port isn’t necessarily a place where things are sold, it’s a transit hub. They transport the goods, they’re like UPS. They take the stuff coming in and make sure it goes to the right place. This thing would need a supply chain all of its own. Because of the volume of trade, this thing would need its own ports just to keep it stocked and fueled, because it would otherwise put a massive strain on the port. It would reduce the carrying capacity of a port for days or even weeks on end, as ferries take the goods back and forth bit by bit. All with a behemoth lingering off the coast, blocking major shipping from coming in, and siphoning tons of fuel just to keep the tank full while she waits. Because they need electricity, and they’re gonna get most of it from the engines running. So the port has nothing coming in, and it’s possibly well above half capacity, trying to get as much of their cargo out to the ship as fast as possible. Since nothing can get in, and things are only going out, it causes shortages further down the supply chain, while they struggle to find other ways of getting the goods into their city. Shortages mean scarcity, and scarcity means a price hike. With a jump in prices and lack of stock, it would only be a matter of time before the city gets enough complaints to tell the port to deny the ship passage and bar it from coming back. This thing is a logistics nightmare to keep running, and would basically cause a small economic crisis everywhere it goes. I’d say it’s pretty spot on to say this thing would be impossible to keep running, just based on that alone.
@@dougerrohmer Oh, and need I forget, transporting that many goods into the area by means other than cargo ship would be difficult to say the least. A cargo ship can carry so many containers, it would take up a train almost forty four miles long. For one ships worth of goods. You could use trucks, but there aren’t enough of them, and they cause traffic jams, slowing down shipping even further. You could try planes, but not many can carry a single container’s worth of stuff, let alone several. The reason ports work so effectively is because they get a large volume of material in before it’s even needed. So most of it doesn’t get sent out right away, the truck and trains have plenty of time to get things moving. If you’re carrying materials in from other ports because one is closed down, that’s a major delay, and if you don’t make up that time then you risk losing ground and creating a shortage. But if you push too much at any given time, you could also cause an accident, causing substantial delays and even bigger shortages. A port is basically the back bone of shipping in a given area, if you block it off like that it causes major problems.
If a 40mph wind gave birth to one of the best memes of 2021, imagine if this thing got partially stuck in a hurricane? We'd be able to see the sea floor without needing a submarine.
@@GreenBlueWalkthrough I apologize if my original comment wasn't clear, but this is what's commonly known as a "joke". Please let me know how else to explain the concept of a "joke" within a CZcams comment, or how I can improve my jokes. P.S. This reply is what is commonly referred to as "sarcasm".
My favorite part is how it says the ship will have zero taxes, but then says they will have to pay some small fees to cover maintenance of the ship and salaries for the workers on the ship. Aren’t those taxes?
In regards to the sponsor, I actually listened to Artemis on Audible about a year ago! Artemis was an extremely good book with lots of science behind it, as well as Audible being a very good audiobook platform(my personal choice)
I spent 5 minutes on Twitter today, so all I can think of is how convenient it would be to have a huge chuck of the ultrarich in one, big, sinkable ship.
Never mind the fact that many of these rich folks had made their money on the backs of tax payers that helped to build the infrastructure ultimately making their businesses possible. Also, what happens if a country wanted to seize this ship and did it militarily? Let me guess, they would look for help from countries to use their tax prayer paid militaries. Funny how they would benefit from others paying taxes, but are appalled when they are asked to pay taxes themselves.
I dont know why they didnt think of building smaller ships that you could anchor and attach together into 1 big complex when not moving and when moving, detach into the smaller ships. Seems to me a way better idea as your building it in working pieces and if project fails half way, you still have working ships.
I remember when Discovery channel and National Geographic were running back to back documentaries on this 'project'. It might be insane but you gotta admit, it's fun to think about.
ya know, this just screams the kinda crazy idea that ends with a mass class uprising of the hired crew taking over the ship after being forced to live in the furnace room.
Whatever mercenary army they decide to hire could just hold the entire ship hostage and ransom off every single billionaire, and they wouldn’t be able to do anything about it since the ship doesn’t abide to any other countries’ law
Waterworld meets Snowpiercer, what could go wrong? How many service personnel needed to work on that ship? And the people refusing to pay taxes are going to agree to tip the army of service workers or even pay them living wages ?
“I don’t want to be a part of society and pay taxes so I want to be a part of an even tighter knit, closely-spaced society and just pay taxes to someone who isn’t a government”
Its the richest people in the world desperately trying to avoid paying taxes. A tsunami destroying it and taking them all down with it is not what I'd call a catastrophe
Because quite literally most people understand more about space travel than they do about the sea and even then they take most of thei knowledge from either Titanic or the Pirates of the Carribean. I mean that before even taking into account the engineering side of the question each vessel absolutely must be registered to some tax haven (you can register it in the US, EU or other country with proper taxation, but virtually no private owner of a commercial ship does this anymore). So your shipizens would actually be citizens of Liberia, Bahamas or Panama - you name it.
Ha ha Royal Carribeans Wonder of the Seas puts the Titanic to shame when it comes to size. It might even compete with this thing. (nah just kidding on that last part)
Another problem I could see would be with the conference room. International leaders could be talking and then a terrorist group or another country's army uses lots of bombs on the ship, not only killing these very important people but also thousands more. A country could capture the ship and use it to transport loads of soldiers and weaponry. These conflicts will do too much damage, and the ship might become no more at some point.
@@Sentient_Blob It surely is would, it has no framework,or even a keel, no freeboard or bulbous bow either. Designing does not take materials or such into consideration. But functionality has to be considered. This ship does not even have lifeboats. Or ladders. It GG if you fall overboard in tbe middle of the Atlantic Ocean... Not only because you can't get up again, or the ice cold water. The water turbulence that's caused from the lack of a bulbous bow will drag you under water.
@@illturralli Dont forget the fact that this thing is supposed to be long-term, including during Hurricanes and *rogue waves*. Meaning it's gotta survive far more beatings than most modern ships could even survive.
I started designing this idea around 6 and stopped designing this idea around 8 years old. I don’t see how they can look at this and not think “that’s gonna sink”
On West Caicos some company built a huge resort but went bankrupt before completion. It was a similar idea tho. Now West Caicos has a long ghost resort occupying the beach on the provo side
Back of the ship: (waving goodbye from NewYork)
Front of ship: "we are approaching London now"
funny
@ 1:26
"Ladies and Gentlemen if you look from the Bow you'll see New York, That will be a 2 hour walk"
@@charlesjakesamadan4008
I guess I can work as an pedicab driver there.
🤣🤣
“ the biggest boat that has ever been imagined” well guess what- i just imagined a bigger one!
And milers... Mile-long Aircraft carriers and battleships.
How about a boat that is a light-year long lol
"Stupidity knows no bounds"
@@mammothcow I don’t want to get too technical, but a ship that big would be too bendy.
Yeah, but can your wealth afford similarly shitty renderings of the thing, LOL!
its called the freedom ship, but you cant really leave and you have to wait for a crew member to take you to land by boat or plane
And if you renounced your citizenship, now you can't enter most countries, since you don't have a valid passport anymore.
Everybody's talking about the ship itself but I'm here just wondering how on earth would the people ever be able to visit any country the ship's visiting. Since, you know, the idea was that people could give up their citizenships. I imagine it's quite difficult to visit a country without a passport.
Ship creates its own passport and rich people lobby it be accepted.
@@noahcarter3868 why would they need this ship? they all already have yachts, if it was that easy the could make a country of one.
@@noahcarter3868 the gave up for citizenships for shipships?
You do not actually have to give up your citizenship for something like this. Many people hold citizenship in more then one country, and usually you pay taxes depending on where your permanent residence is (determined by where you live the majority of the year).
@@daftwulli6145 not to mention that if you spend 6 months or more living outside your country you don’t have to pay taxes for that year in your country, at least that’s what I’ve been told.
All im seeing here is: Worlds biggest ransom payment when a group of mercenaries show up.
considering it's an ancap society every resident will have guns. rough time for pirates
@@uberbosst AND the ship will have its own Coast Guard, which it will need for sailing past Somalia.
@@4JBrewer GL taking over a ship with 20000 crew members...
A ship like this is still a very vulnerable target, even with a fuckton of security around and onboard
@@4JBrewer Nuclear torpedoes exist
Let’s not forget about the security costs either, that much rich people all concentrated together in a slow moving target in the middle of the ocean is bound to attract a couple of pirates at least
What? Explain yourself or delete your comment. Your saying a bunch of starving ethiopians are going to the middle of the pacific to hold up the biggest ship in the world- with a permanent population? Not to mention the police force the ship would have as well.
I don't think it's anything they would need to be concerned about. You know where the pacific is right?
@@ssgoko88 did you see the route rll showed in the video? The route passes by the somali coast. Also Ethiopia is landlocked
@@ssgoko88 bro Ethiopia doesn't have any coasts, it is landlocked. Would be hard for them to be pirate
i guess fighting pirates in the ocean makes it worth it.
@@istyl2525 Somalia is the location of worry. Pirates are a concern there. All they would need is a few well-placed explosives to take the ship hostage, or make whole ship go boom. Super large ships need lots of fuel and fuel is flammable.
So you're telling me, to avoid paying taxes, some people would like to live on a boat, to pay for accommodation, fuel, electricity, water treatment, post services, security, ship crew, food for that crew, maintaining ship infrastructure, medical facilities, schools, setup up rules of conduct? Good thing those are not taxes.
At least that would be a fixed cost and not a percentage of income
Well for the rich that's nothing lol. That's the point. It's not for us normies
@@railroadisolationist5452 still taxes though...
Yeah and it would still be massively massively cheaper than what they pay in a country. You’re talking about costs that pertain to 60,000 people rather than 330,000,000 people.
The rich pay most of the taxes, their tax burden would be like 1/50th of the cost.
Hah…I was about to post almost the exact same comment, so I think you are smart.
i imagine that if such a ship were ever fully built and worked exactly as intended there'd be quite a lot of countries imposing sanction on such a vessel
Hej 😊😊😊
putting the world's most powerful people on a predictable schedule and route is totally a great idea!
pff, what do you expect from crazy religious shepperds sitting in caves in far east? hijacking planes with curtain knifes and precisely pilot them into towers? or sinking a ridiculous large vessel?
no way! 🙄
Exactly what I was thinking! We can get rid of them all in one go 😈
@@hunterG60k Slowly chugging past South Africa like that seems like a great way to get hit by a rogue wave, maybe we would've just had to wait 😂
@@hunterG60k Jealous much?
@@JJAB91 Temporary embarrassed millionaire much?
this boat sounds like something I would think of when I was 6
I dreamed this exact boat up when I was like 7
Me who built this in mc
Yeah
You thought of evading taxes when you were six?
Darkfairy true true
Assuming this is possible, which is a fat assumption, this would be the world's largest terrorist attack target. The way the design is now, it would take a lot to sink it, but it would be absolutely possible, and probably not that hard. How many USS Cole style attacks could this withstand? Four men on four different small boats loaded with explosives ramming it at critical points would likely bring this to the bottom of the ocean, and that would be hard to defend against.
Only an American would think of a terrorist attack as its first issue they would face 😂
@@FLAMEalan more like only people with a brain. If u have trees and oil stockpiled that's just a giant bomb waiting to go off.
@@FLAMEalan you do realize other countries have had terrorist attacks too right?
@@FLAMEalanIt would still be one of the biggest risks.
@@Nebulasecura You must be stupid if you think I don’t know that. I bet you didn’t know about the numerous terrorist attacks in China performed by the certain Uighur Muslims 🤷🏽♂️ But yet you guys don’t like the camp they made to correct people who are suspected to be a part of the organisations behind the attacks
At this point you might aswell make a cluster of smaller ships that float on the ocean. Maybe somewhere near a geothermaly active area for underwater geothermal power. Add some fish farms and whatnot around it. Viola a tax haven like nothing else and its save from flooding too. I mean until the ship eventually breaks.
this is basically Wall-E's spaceship in the form of a... uh... ship
Flippin true
Except it's on the Water!
Are we sure this isn't actually the original inspiration for Wall-E? That whoever at Pixar hadn't once heard about this thing and that's where the initial seed for the story came from?
@@Kiarean It's probable.
It’s a spaceship without the space.
I think the worst part of living on this thing is that all of your neighbors would be the kind of people who would move to a big floating island to avoid taxes.
you spelled "best part" wrong
You mean people you could have an intelligent conversation with, and that wouldn't mug you? Yeah, sounds terrible...
@@towakin7718 and are very egoistic, selfish and not at all social.
For the money, I would want to be a lawyer on that ship
@Kukainis @Towakin, I rest my case.
@@edopronk1303 I disagree. I always found people who advocate for a state to take money and do whatever with it to be the most egoistic, selfish and not at all social.
Poor people want the money to be given to them, rich people who advocate for it want it as a weapon agains competition. Both groups talk that crap to make them appear as morally superior. Not ever have I found a single person of good character advocate for high taxes.
I can foresee a few small problems with renouncing all of your citizenships to avoid taxes. 1) In most countries your obligation to pay taxes doesn't depend on you being a citizen. 2) Some places don't officially recognise renunciation of citizenship and 3) Even if they do most of them only recognise renunciation if you are citizen of somewhere else. Not if it would make you stateless.
A more realistic idea would be to build several smaller versions of this ship and have them sail in a convoy
And of course having ferries to get people to each ship
It’s still a floating city just built in more manageable sections
that would be smart, imagine all of them connecting so that passengers can walk to other ships
boats are nice
Agreed
Shutup boat boy
@@dawg204 shut up cringe boy
Ah yes there beautiful
They are soo nice
To put that in perspective: **Proceeds to use a mall in Washington that most people have no idea about it's size**
Well it's measurements were put into meters already so.....
....and use the population of Greenland, THE WORLDS BIGGEST ISLAND as an example! XD
That's the problem with this channel. He is awful at putting things into perspective.
@@underhillat yeah he seems to put a lot of effort into it also
Just compare the size of the Mall to about two freedom ships.
"without paying any taxes to anyone again"
except to the ship's owners lol
I remember reading about this in a monthly science magazine back in 1999 or 2000. I was in elementary school and still somewhat fond of cruise ships, so there was a fascination to the idea, though I was skeptical about it becoming reality. Through the years since, I don't think I ever heard about it again until this video.
This is a perfect example of "your scientists were so preoccupied with whether they could or couldn't, they didn't stop to think if they should."
Explains most architecture in these days. 111west57th, 432parkavenue, Burj Khalifa and most buildings in Qatar which are just a greedy inhuman just built up area of their troubling city layout and horrid weather for a city, terrible childish construction, and slavery carried from fathers in Nepal. There's also 700 other glass "art" pieces being shoved into Chicago, Manhattan, San Francisco, Hollywood, Florida, France, London especially, Guangzhou and Shanghai, Seoul, Singapore, and Africa which is a whole entire other tragic story with their oasis city.... their delusional... Wish they could of had their happy moments like america in the 20th century, understanding what having wealth means better than the hellscape they are turning their cities into thanks to immaturity to a surplus of self made choices and the large addition digital technology has plagued our ideals with for a beneficial future. These days, our scientists are just people who used to play on an arcade, and our architects are kids that watched too many scifi movies, a lack of care for are historical background only thinking forward and wanting, instead of what we already have. We don't need a PS5, a virtual reality set, 5G and a Tesla (not as though that is anything impressive), Alexa to tell you the weather, a bot to turn your Christmas tree on, a self driving vehicle is pathetic, uber pickup because the thing you go to meant for easy lazy people called a drive through, wasn't enough apparently, and a fit boy when half of the people today can barely keep fit and usually only wear it as a piece of jewelry because nothing says leisurely like a hot pink artificial band with a ominous glossy black square in the center listing all the things it knows about you.
Ohh nice quote from jurassic park, love it
They should build that thing. Imagine the satisfaction, sinking that thing with all on board.
Ok .. the crew issue needs to be worked out first.
@@tomasbickel58 getting off those medications should be the first and last step
The most surprising part of this design was that it wasn't planned to be nuclear powered. 😏
Your name and pic just made me shoot red bull out my nose
Agreed it is quite an omission
Honestly, I don't think it's possible for a non-government entity to build a nuclear powered anything?
Maybe I am wrong, but it could be very dangerous for a nuclear power plant to be out in the open without any military protection...
Just my thoughts...
@@goonerOZZ nuke power plants are private not military
@@goonerOZZ That is not an issue when you are designing such a vessel. Building yes. Using yes. Dangerous oh yes but Running a ship of this size on disel is the most insane part. It would need a tanker refilling it constantly just to keep it stable. No wonder it is still in the design stage.
has anyone ever thought about the noisepollution and vibrations of being underneath a giant airport?
I mean they can dodge taxes but its really because they aren't using any benefits from the taxes (i.e. police, hospitals etc) anyways, so I don't think there's much wrong with that. If the pirates get them, just don't expect any military to help either LOL.
As a Somali pirate, I am really hoping they can overcome any obstacles and get this exciting project afloat soon!
Edit: Your fictional solutions to thwart my fictional piracy are all lame. Prepare to be boarded.
Yup
@People of China live free and destroy the CCP People of China live in solidarity and prosper under wise leadership of Xi Jinping and destroy libertarian freedom boat with glorious people’s navy.
@People of China live free and destroy the CCP The People's Liberation Army Navy's array of future artificial reefs will gloriously puncture the hull and sink the Tax Dodging Future Dream Boat regardless of how much money the libertarians spend or mercs with money that is in no way a tax.
I was going to point that out. Gonna be a field day for you.
As a Djiboutian pirate, same
I went to college to be a naval architect. I distinctly remember sending this guy my resume when I graduated cause I had no standards and I needed a damn job.
No standards no probs
Any chance you want to pay it forward and hire someone with tons of passion and zero qualifications beyond navigation 😁
amazing
@@MrCurbinator Be a river pilot. They make bank.
Sounds like a super niche market did you find a long term job as a naval architect yet
This thing looks incredibly un-seaworthy. Considering it has to travel across the north Atlantic and Cape Horn.
I think you may have overlooked the log ships from the 1800s early 1900s. They were enormous. They basically just used huge chains to make absolutely humongous, ocean going log rafts. Mind boggling in scale.
Interesting, I didn't know about them. Only 700-1,000 feet long though.
After that project failed, he built an underwater city called Rupture, but that's a story for another time...
Ah yes Rupture, the shareware version of Rapture.
"I chose the impossible. I chose... Rapture, a city where the artist would not fear the censor, where the scientist would not be bound by petty morality, where the great would not be constrained by the small! And with the sweat of your brow, Rapture can become your city as well."
I’m playing this game right now lol
An underwater city called Rupture? Seriously? What's next -- maybe he renames his Freedom Ship the Titanic, or designs a yacht called the Mary Celeste, or a spaceship called the Challenger ...
@@seanbigay1042 It was a typo, intentional or not. Obviously he meant Rapture, which has a completely different meaning.
Rupture, an instance of breaking or bursting suddenly and completely.
Rapture, a feeling of intense pleasure or joy.
This kind of ship that screams “hey pirates there’s wealthy people on board come and get them”
I have to imagine there would be security. And seeing as they're staying in international waters, that security can have machine guns and surface-to-water missiles.
@@colinsmith1495 how many of the crew are security?
@@Joemamahahahaha821 you think he would know? No one knows because the thing hasn't been fucking built, although i'd have to imagine quite a few, not just for somali pirates but for onboard pirates too, the thing would have it's own police dpt
@@wabbit4936 that’s why I was asking him he was so certain like “ oh it’ll have security” yes probably needs 20k for j security
If this thing is ever build it will be destroyed by someone.
"Without paying any taxes to anyone ever again."
Except paying rent live on the ship...
So... taxes.
Imagine the security it would need. Literally a boat full of some of the most hated people on the planet.
Only "some" ...if lucky, "all".
If everyone in the world would send them $1 to make this ship, it would still be not enough.
But if everyone sent $10 we would have enough with a lot left over.
@@GiantsRTheBest1 In some countries $10 is a hell of a lot of money for the average person
@@SdoubleA well some people can pay more, government spends 50x times that in a week
What about $2
@@KingCrow404 we should spend some more in fusion energy, then we can build this
They missed an epic opportunity to call it the “Freedom Freighter”
Lol
nice one
Sorry can you please educate me I thought freight had to do with trucking
@@kiki9373 it also has to do with ships, i just thought it would be more memorable of a name instead of the Freedom ship
@@medic2229 it's cool, it does sound way better tho
Could you imagine sentencing yourself to life on a prison ship? The only way to avoid US taxes is to transfer all of your money out of the country without the government noticing and then renouncing your citizenship. With no passport you can't leave that ship, you are stuck on it for life.
“I shouldn’t have to pay taxes!!! 🤬”
“Oh, I’m just gonna charge you guys a little HOA fee to keep the ship running. You totes understand, right? 😇”
-the douchebag who designed this ship
Future Real Life Lore episode: How the Freedom Ship permanently blocked the Suez Canal
That would be hilariously funny.
Lol the us would sink it on the first day it blocked the Suez canal.
Nah we got some nukes to vanished it, with those nukes, we can even create a larger canal
@@alfaseeds13 It’s been rumored
It's far too wide to fit through the Canal at all, there's no way it could even attempt that journey
Let's not forget the physics of trying steer/stop this thing. The forces involved would be immense.
It seems to me that most of the problems with this project could be solved by having multiple, smaller ships instead of a single, enormous ship.
At that point anyone rich enough can just buy their own boat and do it themselves
A well-placed iceberg could cause some tragic deja vu.
@@vigilantcosmicpenguin8721 lmao
That’s not the libertarian way
@@vigilantcosmicpenguin8721 An Iceberg wouldn't phase this thing
I love the 90’s era animation for showing off the project. Helps communicate just how long this project has been “in development “ for.
This seems like a great idea to get seized by any nation with any navy at all. There are a lot of nations that would like to nationalize something that expensive, or take the passengers captive for ransom or tax. And since none of them would have citizenship, it wouldn’t even cause a diplomatic incident.
Being on a cruise ship for eternity sounds like a punishment dreamed up in the hell only Dante could describe.
Eh retirees do it all the time, its not that bad if u think about it. Hotel style living arrangement, movies, pools, gyms, restourants, entertainment all close to u
@@jorgeponsa7464 also a visit to alot, alot of countries everyday.
Yeah traveling the world in luxury continuously without having to pay taxes sounds fucking rough. Also I'm pretty sure this video and the guy who came up with the idea described it...sooooo
No taxes. Therefore it’s worth it
I wonder if it's like in the Twilight Zone episode "A Nice Place to Visit".
“The largest ship seriously designed” I think we have different definitions of the word “seriously”
I mean I can easily design a spaceship the size of the sun in 5 mins. It takes doing the actual engineering of it to be considered "seriously designed".
@@Omar-if3vd I think the difference here is that it’s actually designed to be physically possible and have a feasible business plan for existing (tax havens and vacations).
People would be taking it a lot more seriously if someone like Elon Musk got their name on the project.
Colonizing Mars is way crazier and more ambitious than this shit, and somehow people take it seriously.
I believe it is clearly serious in the sense of "Designed with the intent of actually bringing it about," whether or not you believe it's serious in the sense of "Perfectly sane, reasonable, practical, and economical."
@@innosam123 How do you keep your money safe from governments that really want it. The US government puts serious pressure on other country's banking systems when they send the tax man after you.
@@innosam123 That's because people are saps. :P
I wonder what the light manufacturing is for... They're already going to have to import every scrap of food, why not just import all the manufactured stuff as well? Maybe the reason for having it is so that the people who can afford this have some common laborers to exploit in the manner to which they have become accustomed?
For some odd reason, by the way, I look at those pictures and the phrase "deathtrap in a fire" comes to mind.
man if they do ever end up actually building it, it sure would be a shame if something were to happen to it.
"no taxes but we will need some money every month for upkeep costs, gas, paying the crew etc. and then we'll probably need police and healthcare and your kids will probably want to go to school so we'll need money for that every month, we'll just take a percentage of your income to cover that but no taxes!"
We?
Yes, there would be upkeep and fuel costs. Crew costs too. Police and fire would need funding, to some extent. Healthcare could be entirely private though. So could schools.
I know right? By paying to live there you're paying to help it run and function. You can call it whatever you want. Technically it would just be called "part of your rent", but hell, call it a snozberry pie if you want, I don't give a shit. Whatever you call it, you're still paying taxes. Oh I just remembered, if you want to tax someone but you dont want to use the word tax you use the word 'fee'. Like how postmates taxes you double, but they split it in half, one is a 'tax' and the other a 'service fee'.
Man some libertards will believe in the same concept as long as its not the T word
There's also going to develop a huge class divide. As stated, there is a fairly large crew on board. Alot of those "fees" (uh..hm...taxes) would go to their pay, upkeep and support. We all know the nature of the privileged rich and we all know what the nature of their "utopia" will be.
@randomguy8196 What about the workers on this ship? They would have to live in it as well. It's almost like you can't have a society of just billionaires because its poor people who do the actual work that keeps a society running. So fuck them I guess? Well they tried that in the gilded age and guess what happened? labor riots happened.
So he wants to build a ship with money that is more than he has to pay taxes?
The cost isn't as crazy as it might seem: $10 billion among 40,000 people is $250k each.
@@iloveprivacy8167 yea I can pay that every month!
@@jokerplays6139 did you watch the video? That would be just the investment to build it, I’m sure once it’s built a more reasonable price would be generated.
the rich have a disdain for paying taxes because they absolutely hate the poor.
@@jokerplays6139 this would be for the mega-rich to dodge taxes. I can guarantee they see 250k as nothing.
How would that work in an emergency, if the ship held that many people, a rescue effort would require so many ships it would be unreal.
Not to mention that the planned route went through loads of bad areas, Cape of good home, the sea near Somalia.
I see two major flaws: either make the ship shorter to fit at least the Suez Canal or make it longer to accomodate a full private jet enabled double runway (for the rich CEO on board) to land some modern jet planes on.
This ship would make for a great setting for a disaster movie. Imagine 100 000 people, most of whom shady Wall Street bankers with no real life skills, all rushing to the lifeboats at the same time.
its libertarian it won't have life boats.
@@ThePyroRussian life boats are just more welfare. If you want a life boat why didn’t you tie your private yacht to the back of it like the rest of us
I feel like I saw a movie with a similar plot a few years ago. It didn't go too well for the rich people. Or the poor people. Or... anyone, really, now that I think about it.
@@saraperry6667 the iceberg of the ships
A pirate commando boards the ship and take command of it. They demand a ransom of $100 000 000 for everyone aboard or they'll detonate a nuclear device in the middle of it.
To be fair 2.5 times the cost of the “Freedom Tower” says more about the tower than the ship and, if anything, makes the cost seem _less_ insane
Look up how much the us military ships costs
the freedom tower was actually a lot for a sky scraper though, it took a lot more money to build than the burk khalifa
That's only the preliminary cost estimate. The conception phase is not finished yet, and it probably nearing the billion. That's the kind of project where the actual costs can get to 1000% to 10 000% over the original estimates.
@@sasugage2168 The USS Gerald R. Ford cost about the same as HK's W Kowloon railway station plus its underground HSR link between in & mainland China I recall
@@sasugage2168 almost 800 billion dollars
I could not imagine the horror of landing a plane on a ship. I know they do it in the military but these are passenger planes
Not only that, but fighter jets and attack planes are tiny in comparisson, imagine trying to land a 737 here.
Dude, you have been told a million times already, but your narrator voice is... amazing!
I’d imagine that maintaining such a super massive ship would be difficult, and engineering it’s structure to be hospitable for civilians would be a nightmare.. then imagine the noro virus outbreaks on the ship
COVID-19
@@ronmaximilian6953 Super Mario Sunshine's final level.
they would all obviously pay a fee for upkeep and the services
a certain cut on their income for common good
I think the technical problems are solvable. The social and political ones much less so.
I'd be more worried about the inevitable petty, absolute dictatorship that would install itself within a few months.
I love how this entire project was designed to avoid paying taxes but the residents would still have to regularly pay money to the ruling body of the country in order to keep it functioning. I think there's a name for that
As long as it's not the T word suckers will do ot
Except for one is completely voluntary and consensual if you choose to board it
And don't forget their own mercenary army to protect them. Just imagine one day their mercenaries decide they'll be the new government. They can't demand the mercenaries because they don't accept any external law, so not law system to defend them. That will be beautiful.
Condo , condo association, maintenance fees, condo commandos...
@@ejethan123 Well if you choose to emigrate into a different country that would also be completely voluntary and consensual. And that's basically what that ship is intended to be, its own country.
I think the worst thing about this whole insane project is that the ship looks like a giant square floating box.
Im amazed he didnt talk about the massive threat something like this would just have from the ocean itself, extreme storms and waves ect have a chance to cause massive damage to such a massive money sink.
Yeah, that is open Pacific Ocean for a good chunk of the journey.
This is the kinda stuff me and the boys dreamed of building in minecraft when we were 9
and then you grew up... (I hope)
@WAN Chi Tao Adrian lmao
Impossible in real life but possible with Minecraft
@@ghrvjdev But ships in Minecraft don't really move unless you make an extremely big piston mechanisms, which usually break apart.
2021 - The Evergreen gets stuck in the Suez canal
2025 - The Suez canal gets stuck in the Freedom Ship :)
Lol
Wait I believe it will take upto 2030 to make the ship alone.... So nah
Help me step-canal, I’m stuck
@@brandonlane1806 XD
2 ships 1 canal 😏
"Libertarian dream country". Surely this time it won't turn out to be a disaster like all of the previous attempts.
As it turns out, we actually need a government to keep people from killing each other. Anarchists need to hear this too.
It looks kinda cool tho. Very sci fi. Imagine the engine rooms and pipes and stuff. The urban ecosystems.
Imagine it would not fit into any drydock. When the hull gets compromised we'd finally know that Atlantis wasn't a tale but a premonition.
Freedom ship: tries to enter in the Suez Canal
Egypt: *Ever given horrible flashback*
it would have no reason to enter the Suez canal in the first place
@@Exoticlover1629 it might want to take a short cut and conveniently get stuck like the Ever given.
@@satos1 will it even fit in the hole
That's what she said
Even Given? Do you mean Ever Given?
@@Devlinator61116 sorry for the mistake I changed it
It'd be cool to work on something like that. Only downside would be rich snobs and I've been dealing with those most of my life. Would definitely let it be out to sea for a few months first to make sure it worked right though lol.
Listen, take it from a Japanese ww2 enthusiast. Building the biggest ship ever isn't necessarily a good thing. We built the biggest and most powerful battleship to ever exist, it was called the IJN Yamato. It truly was a magnificent creature. But unfortunately being the biggest battleship in history makes you really easy to hit so it ended up being sunk. Quite literally the definition of glass cannon. It packs a massive punch but it was also very vulnerable to aerial attacks and torpedos due to its sheer size
Okay, so there are several concerns I have with the project. One, ships need to be able to flex in rough seas. I’m almost certain that something like this would tear itself apart at sea, just based on the limits of the material alone. Two, this thing would disrupt sea traffic ANYWHERE it goes. Even parked out at sea, she would likely block major shipping/commercial routes. Her very presence would leach a port city dry from all the resources she’d need to take on, and all the goods she’s blocked off, each stop. Thirdly, the fuel consumption would be MASSIVE. Modern cargo ships, some of the largest vessels currently in existence, already use about 63,000 gallons of diesel per day. And given that she’s constantly on the move, she doesn’t have any set refueling locations. She could singlehandedly drain an entire port city of diesel, causing shortages in the area for weeks or even months. The sheer volume of resource consumption would likely lead many nations to deny her entry into their waters, meaning that resupplies would be even farther between. There’s a good chance that, after a few consecutive stops denying her entry, she would run out of fuel entirely and be stuck out at sea. Then you’d have to try and get help evacuating 100,000 people from a ship dead in the water. Freedom Ship not only sounds stupid, it is a logistical nightmare.
Do you really think port cities, which are basically Walmarts of the sea, are gonna say "Uh, know, we really do not want to sell everything on our shelves all at once, even when we knew for months that you are coming"? This ship won't work for many reasons that you mentioned, but not the ports thing.
@@dougerrohmer it’s not an issue of selling. They’ll sell to the ship just fine. It’s an issue of, other ships can’t get through to replace the resources it consumes, and it’s draining so much of it that everything else doesn’t get anything. It would cause shortages everywhere it goes. If that creates enough public tension, the city/county might not have a choice but to deny harbor, or they risk an uproar.
@@Nikolai_The_Crazed If the ship physically blocks access, that's one thing. But these things don't happen overnight - they can predict their orders weeks in advance and adjust stock level accordingly, unless their is an international shortage of something maybe.
@@dougerrohmer Well, there is a limit to how much a port can carry. We’re talking about something the size of a literal small city. They don’t have limitless space for cargo, and we’re still talking about a logistics nightmare just to get this thing fueled. The trucks and ships needed to bring more stuff in might not have enough left if a large portion of the diesel is going to a floating city. Because this thing isn’t just supplying for the time being, they’re stocking up in advance in case a trip runs longer than it has to. The largest container ships can hold about 21,000 containers, and that’s considered pushing the limits on what a port can handle in a day. The port in the city of Los Angeles handled about 30,000 containers a day last year, and it’s one of the busiest in the world. And a port isn’t necessarily a place where things are sold, it’s a transit hub. They transport the goods, they’re like UPS. They take the stuff coming in and make sure it goes to the right place. This thing would need a supply chain all of its own. Because of the volume of trade, this thing would need its own ports just to keep it stocked and fueled, because it would otherwise put a massive strain on the port. It would reduce the carrying capacity of a port for days or even weeks on end, as ferries take the goods back and forth bit by bit. All with a behemoth lingering off the coast, blocking major shipping from coming in, and siphoning tons of fuel just to keep the tank full while she waits. Because they need electricity, and they’re gonna get most of it from the engines running. So the port has nothing coming in, and it’s possibly well above half capacity, trying to get as much of their cargo out to the ship as fast as possible. Since nothing can get in, and things are only going out, it causes shortages further down the supply chain, while they struggle to find other ways of getting the goods into their city. Shortages mean scarcity, and scarcity means a price hike. With a jump in prices and lack of stock, it would only be a matter of time before the city gets enough complaints to tell the port to deny the ship passage and bar it from coming back. This thing is a logistics nightmare to keep running, and would basically cause a small economic crisis everywhere it goes. I’d say it’s pretty spot on to say this thing would be impossible to keep running, just based on that alone.
@@dougerrohmer Oh, and need I forget, transporting that many goods into the area by means other than cargo ship would be difficult to say the least. A cargo ship can carry so many containers, it would take up a train almost forty four miles long. For one ships worth of goods. You could use trucks, but there aren’t enough of them, and they cause traffic jams, slowing down shipping even further. You could try planes, but not many can carry a single container’s worth of stuff, let alone several. The reason ports work so effectively is because they get a large volume of material in before it’s even needed. So most of it doesn’t get sent out right away, the truck and trains have plenty of time to get things moving. If you’re carrying materials in from other ports because one is closed down, that’s a major delay, and if you don’t make up that time then you risk losing ground and creating a shortage. But if you push too much at any given time, you could also cause an accident, causing substantial delays and even bigger shortages. A port is basically the back bone of shipping in a given area, if you block it off like that it causes major problems.
If a 40mph wind gave birth to one of the best memes of 2021, imagine if this thing got partially stuck in a hurricane?
We'd be able to see the sea floor without needing a submarine.
Not much the ship is really heavy and it moves so like a normal ruise ship it can just get out of the way.
@@GreenBlueWalkthrough I apologize if my original comment wasn't clear, but this is what's commonly known as a "joke". Please let me know how else to explain the concept of a "joke" within a CZcams comment, or how I can improve my jokes. P.S. This reply is what is commonly referred to as "sarcasm".
@@LtNduati Oh sorry most people who say stuff like that are not joking.
If this ship, with a bunch of rich folks on it, got stuck somewhere...
I don't think I'd be the only one who'd want it blown up.
@@LtNduati that’s kind of a dickish reply. Your joke was a normal concern, why be rude to someone taking you seriously?
My favorite part is how it says the ship will have zero taxes, but then says they will have to pay some small fees to cover maintenance of the ship and salaries for the workers on the ship. Aren’t those taxes?
In regards to the sponsor, I actually listened to Artemis on Audible about a year ago! Artemis was an extremely good book with lots of science behind it, as well as Audible being a very good audiobook platform(my personal choice)
He also owned a restaraunt named “Food Shop”, he had a cat named “Not a dog” and a goldfish called “Wet orange thing”
Ok.
This guy should be banned from having children so he doesn’t name them something stupid
Asgore.
@@thetwizard9290 like smol human?
dude has humor
I spent 5 minutes on Twitter today, so all I can think of is how convenient it would be to have a huge chuck of the ultrarich in one, big, sinkable ship.
Twiiter is a massive risk factor for cancer development
@@drabnail777 SO's being alive
Very convenient, indeed.
@@drabnail777 Truuu
That's not gonna work, the billionares are melting all the icebergs we could sink it with
Never mind the fact that many of these rich folks had made their money on the backs of tax payers that helped to build the infrastructure ultimately making their businesses possible. Also, what happens if a country wanted to seize this ship and did it militarily? Let me guess, they would look for help from countries to use their tax prayer paid militaries. Funny how they would benefit from others paying taxes, but are appalled when they are asked to pay taxes themselves.
I dont know why they didnt think of building smaller ships that you could anchor and attach together into 1 big complex when not moving and when moving, detach into the smaller ships. Seems to me a way better idea as your building it in working pieces and if project fails half way, you still have working ships.
I remember when Discovery channel and National Geographic were running back to back documentaries on this 'project'.
It might be insane but you gotta admit, it's fun to think about.
What happens when it sinks
@@jonjohnson102 How many super carriers sink?
It really isn;t more ahead of it's time but Japan could use a fleet of these.
nice boat!!!
Would international law allow 100000 people to not abide to any nation's law tho
They don’t have enough money to even make a good 3D perspective video, imagine to actually build this thing
According to timeline, I guess this animation is like at least 25 years old so it's not that bad
They never got the funding to build the ship, so no funding for animations either
@@penusliski 25 years ago they knew how to design ships bruh…. So not an excuse for this abomination
@@Girtharmstrong69 I was referring to CGI animation, not to the ship design
@@penusliski your comment was responding to a comment about design…..
I had a crazy idea like this at one point in my life. And then I turned eight.
The day this embarks is the day I become a scurvy pirate pillaging my heart out..hehe
ya know, this just screams the kinda crazy idea that ends with a mass class uprising of the hired crew taking over the ship after being forced to live in the furnace room.
Whatever mercenary army they decide to hire could just hold the entire ship hostage and ransom off every single billionaire, and they wouldn’t be able to do anything about it since the ship doesn’t abide to any other countries’ law
Nice running water you got there... Would be really nice if the maintenance crew... SHUT IF OFF! (Pulls valve)
The movie, snowpiercer, comes to mind.
Bro quit living in your socialist fantasy
As opposed to the original capitalist fantasy of a kilometre long ship that's basically Rapture but worse?
This ship seems like a perfect battleground for a Godzilla vs Kong fight js
Yes I agree
Why was I thinking of that once I saw the runway?
Don't forget to sell them both tickets first!!
It's actually a pretty cool idea, my only issue is, how deep will the draft of a 1.3km ship go underwater. It couldnt ever go near coast.
Waterworld meets Snowpiercer, what could go wrong? How many service personnel needed to work on that ship? And the people refusing to pay taxes are going to agree to tip the army of service workers or even pay them living wages ?
“I don’t want to be a part of society and pay taxes so I want to be a part of an even tighter knit, closely-spaced society and just pay taxes to someone who isn’t a government”
But will of course have to administer all of the same basic functions of a government.
Reminds me of the Citadel of Ricks.
Yes, exactly
A place where bunch of unelected people who are competent will take decisions instead of clowns who came in power by manipulating masses
@@ashleycat4 "You guys where so sick of the government that you became your own government!"
There could be only ONE captain worthy of such ship: Francesco Schettino.
Closer Francesco, I want to touch the coast.
So true.
Where’s the captain?
And where is the ship?
what do you mean you abandoned it people are still on it
The plane pushed you out?
@@ZaHandle i can't help but read all of this in Internet Historian's voice
"The ship is meant as a method of tax evasion."
The IRS:"Dear Mr. President, grab the football!"
Dodge taxes by joining this ship!
You have to pay rent and utilities fees... Wait, that's just taxes.
What's scary is that there are multiple people alive who could build this just with their own fortune.
to have it immediately crumble and shatter under its own weight
Why is that scary?
Some Jeff could build 15 of these today, and still be left with $48 billion.
@@aexetan2769 If he liquidated is assets and got rid of his means of making money ever again, sure.
Money can't buy everything. You need good logistics. This ship could break away.
Having a tsunami hit it would result in a catastrophe, I wouldn't be able to imagine living on a ship my whole life in the first place
At sea is actually the safest place to be during a tsunami, as it just pushes the ship up a bit
Its the richest people in the world desperately trying to avoid paying taxes. A tsunami destroying it and taking them all down with it is not what I'd call a catastrophe
A tsunami is a swell of water rather than a classical wave, boats at sea might not even notice a tsunami is happening.
Like the other people said, tsunamis dont really affect boats at sea. The waves only become dangerous & start to crest closer to shore
A rogue wave is more what you’re talking about. And those can be pretty hard to predict too
imagine if they completed this ship but just for it to end up in the bottom of the ocean
Frank Fontaine: they all think they’re gonna be captains of industry. But they all forget. Someone’s gotta scrub the toilets
Imagine if this sunk: we'd have a real-life Rapture on our hands.
Nobody:
Glaciers: I'm about to end capitalism
Would you kindly...
@@tahamohiuddin7425 would be basiclu immune to ice. Betg
@@helencobler ah yes ice. Betg
@@anabsolutemess8850 im on an i pod this thing is impossible to type on
A rich dude watches "Jaws", hears the line "we're gonna need a bigger boat", and decides "I can do this!"
We're gonna need a bigger shark.
@B Gaming9 Thank you, Mr or Mrs Perfectionist... lol
THE BIGGEST BOAT THAT HAS EVER SAILED
Probably easier to design interfaces by which vessels could join one or more other vessels. Each with its own propulsion, ownership, ability to leave.
When they drew the route of the freedom ship and they went right passed Somalia I lol'd
I love how he has compared the ship with the old titanic, that tells how we still think of Titanic when it comes to big ship
Because quite literally most people understand more about space travel than they do about the sea and even then they take most of thei knowledge from either Titanic or the Pirates of the Carribean. I mean that before even taking into account the engineering side of the question each vessel absolutely must be registered to some tax haven (you can register it in the US, EU or other country with proper taxation, but virtually no private owner of a commercial ship does this anymore). So your shipizens would actually be citizens of Liberia, Bahamas or Panama - you name it.
Ha ha Royal Carribeans Wonder of the Seas puts the Titanic to shame when it comes to size. It might even compete with this thing. (nah just kidding on that last part)
1:24 That is quite the distance to walk in 12 minutes
About 7 km/h
@@skan5728 I'm going to assume you didn't notice the km at end
I thought i was the only one who noticed haha
@@thatrand0mnpc it's 1,370 km, not 1370 km, 1 kilometer and 370 metres
@lasyagna i like italian food there are different ways to mark that, in many countries (mine included) the comma is used in decimal numbers
One issue that would be a serious one is piracy. Not being flagged to any nation the ship would be open to constant attacks with no one to help.
Another problem I could see would be with the conference room. International leaders could be talking and then a terrorist group or another country's army uses lots of bombs on the ship, not only killing these very important people but also thousands more. A country could capture the ship and use it to transport loads of soldiers and weaponry. These conflicts will do too much damage, and the ship might become no more at some point.
Ice berg that sunk the titanic: Finally! A worthy opponent! Our battle will be legendary!
*Iceberg gets destroyed*
Global warming: I'm going to stop you right there
@@dinosaurking3822 Global warming could unleash an army of icebergs, for a short while at least.
these rich people are the reason the iceberg that sunk the titanic is melting, so i think its safe to say rich people win this battle
Haha Reddit moment keanu chungus wholesome 100!!!!
This ship looks like it was designed by a highschool freshman that has no knowledge of of the sea.
But neat idea.
Wouldn’t the thing snap in half due to all the waves bending and pulling at it?
@@Sentient_Blob It surely is would, it has no framework,or even a keel, no freeboard or bulbous bow either.
Designing does not take materials or such into consideration. But functionality has to be considered.
This ship does not even have lifeboats. Or ladders. It GG if you fall overboard in tbe middle of the Atlantic Ocean... Not only because you can't get up again, or the ice cold water. The water turbulence that's caused from the lack of a bulbous bow will drag you under water.
@@illturralli would a missing keel make it more unstable? The center of gravity looks precariously high to me! 😯
@@illturralli Dont forget the fact that this thing is supposed to be long-term, including during Hurricanes and *rogue waves*. Meaning it's gotta survive far more beatings than most modern ships could even survive.
I started designing this idea around 6 and stopped designing this idea around 8 years old. I don’t see how they can look at this and not think “that’s gonna sink”
On West Caicos some company built a huge resort but went bankrupt before completion. It was a similar idea tho. Now West Caicos has a long ghost resort occupying the beach on the provo side
I enjoyed "Artemis" by Andy weir almost as much as The Martian. And I really liked "The Martian".