My First Roll of Lomography Lady Grey 400 (Fomapan 400), in the Nikon F3

Back in 2020 during the first lockdown, photography helped keep me sane One of the rolls I shot was a roll of Lomography Lady Grey 400 (Fomapan 400) in 35 mm format in my Nikon F3.
Datasheet:
www.foma.cz/en/fomapan-400
Check out my social media and Patreon:
www.shaka1277.com
/ shaka1277
www.flickr.com/photos/1553073...
/ shaka1277
00:00 Introduction
00:23 Film Overview
03:02 Shooting Details
05:37 Pros
08:50 Cons
10:59 Deep Dive
11:06 No. 3
11:55 No. 2
12:48 No. 1
13:53 Conclusion
15:24 Gallery

[@rpmanago]

I looove most of these photos. Especially the last two! Great compositions. And this film’s tonality is good as well.

[@l10industries]

I feel another important thing to mention about Fomapan 400 that a lot of poeple don't know is that even on the datasheet none of the charts show it as a 400 ISO film. Using standard developers you are really getting 250 ISO at most. Maaaayyyyyybeeee 320 ISO. That being said, lovely classic looking film stock.

[@Shaka1277]

That, along with the reciprocity, are things I want to mention when I eventually do a full review! I've been comparing the stuff in different developers to get a feel of the negative density.

[@vasyapupken]

1:38 that's strange. i never experienced a lack of anti-halation layer on Foma films (shoot it last time about 5 yers ago). they are all just regular old fashioned BW films.
i dropped Foma films years ago when have faced several rolls with defective emulsion in a row. some with holes and some cracked.
(but Foma paper are just perfect. maybe the best paper on a market)