Fed fan since 2005 but Rafa is amazing to watch too. He deserves all the respect. He can't be considered as a simple clay performer. On hard court, he reached many times a very high tennis level
Golden era at its peak...all 3 were peaking here..fed was playing unbelievable in 2011-2012..it was just coinciding with djoko and nadals peaks as well.. amazing times..will miss this so much
Each member of big 4 won grand slam 2012: Djokovic AO: d. Nadal Nadal FO: d. Djokovic Federer W: d. Murray Murray US: d. Djokovic Best year for this lot
@@aleksamilosevic8792 Ok, maybe not more passing shots. And admittedly, I did not watch that entire 2012 match. But based upon highlights, it appear to me as though Rafa hit more ridiculous shots during his 2009 AO final.
He did but Roger’s coverage at the net has gotten worse over the years. There have been over 100 times where Rafa passed Roger with a shot he could have gotten-no matter how good the shot is. Like at 13:10 Roger just stood there!!
I am blessed to be a Rafa fan. Roger, no doubt, was born to play tennis. He is elegant, he is precise and, when on song, it seems like he could do no wrong. But, with Rafa, it's like a roller coaster, a tornado of emotions and, when it's over, you are relieved and bask in the glory of his victory. It is as if we also did something momentous along with him. Wishing Rafa a healthy life and a long career full of victories.
The thing that keeps Roger in the game against Nadal is his own surgically precise shots that don't allow the opponent to push roger to get stretched and change the momentum of the point unless of course you manage to pick every one of those shots and keep returning it back to Federer. If you look at the first set, he had frustrated Nadal. For Nadal to lose but finish 7-6 in the first set, where Roger was so utterly dominating itself shows how great a player he is. Any other player would have lost this match 3-0 against Federer. But Nadal plays relentlessly. He can do what Roger can't and that is run for every single ball and pick every single one of them and then even return it back to the opponent in hard to pick positions. It was incredible to see how Nadal got Roger frustrated in the next 2 sets. For Nadal to win this match 3-1 speaks volumes about his ability on the hard-court.
That first set federer took charge and was on top of the baseline especially those first 5 games. You let federer sit on top of the baseline like that it doesn’t matter who you are he’s beating you. Nadal slowed down the pace started feeding him those high backhands backed him up a little, federer got passed a few times it was over federer utterly looked lost
in tennis the emotional moment counts a lot. Federer def Djokovic in wimbledon 2012, this same Djokovic we see here like a god. Remeber this and look the numbers and matches, Federer had a mental dominance over Djokovic until 2012, it may seem pointless, but, Federer would probably have a better chance of beating Djokovic in this tournament than Nadal. Djokovic had developed a surreal confidence against Nadal over the course of 2011 to 2012, and Nadal was suffering from it emotionally despite the effort. Djokovic was inside Nadal's head. on the other hand, Federer everyone knows, had a mental block against Nadal that was only broken in 2017. I think in all these years the defeats of Federer against Nadal were more a psychological problem for Federer himself. Of course, Nadal is a hero, he had all the credit for creating that insecurity in Federer's mind. But Federer was again more anxious than usual (and made a lot of choice mistakes in this match, if you look closely) simply because it was against Nadal. anyway it was another amazing match, that classic comeback from Nadal
Plus mentally Nadal had the edge over Fed during this period. The mental game in top level tennis is the key, any top pro will tell you that. The fact that Nadal beat Fed from the go and always had an upper hand in their rivalry made Nadal believe he can always beat him if he can just hang in there and absorb the attacking pressure. Djoker took a while to get to that stage but post 2011 he did the same.
The fact no one is talking about 4:10 shows me how much people don’t know about tennis, he hit that flat af on the highest part of the net on a stretch with the ball being low already from behind the baseline
Nadal is just the best at those wonderful passing shots where his opponent thinks, well if he gets his racket on that and gets it back it will be an easy overhead or volley but no, just when the ball is about to bounce for a second time and the shot looks impossible, then Nadal just ”UHHH” and BOOM! An incredible pass of a shot that looked hopeless. Nadal is simply the greatest passing shot player ever. No contest.
With that top spin on it. Fed was slumping, and was not doing a good job by not flattening shots. Through out the game he was lobbing balls nonstop, and even though nadal did too, it was nadal that took advantage of Fed
This match is a clear illustration of where Rafa (and Novak) got the better of Federer. Federer is an artist who can demolish his opponents with his fast fluent game. But he has his relaxing moments when he gives away cheap points and the unforced errors start piling. Rafa and Novak are much more focused throughout the match than Roger and that was the main difference imo during those years. The breakpoint 5-4 4th set shows it exactly!
Yeah, definitely know what you mean. And there's no bonuses for cool points. For every flashy point that Federer wins, there's more points where he lets his guard down and loses a point should have won, or gets ground down into an unforced error off the backhand wing. Granted Federer was still winning matches against pretty much everyone else on the tour, but at the level of the big 3 [big 4], those tiny differences at crucial moments are the difference between winning and losing big matches
In any case, Nadal returned a lot of balls, his main strategy was that... Federer is the best player in history... Djokovic at least has more winning shots, he generates angles... Nadal is very basic.
2009 Rafa at AO was unbelievable. 2012 was not. He really missed that aggressiveness of 2009 with the mental strength and his insane and consistent shotmaking. 2012 he would make ridiculous shots, but then he wouldn't be able to sustain his aggression and play too passive at times. 2009 he was insane at both sides of the game. The only version of Rafa that could beat Novak at Australian Open is the 2009 one. That one would have done it. Ever since than Rafa is good enough to win it, but always lacking that consistency in his shotmaking. I love Rafa, but it's clear that as much as his serve, backhand etc. has improved...it's his strength...the Forehand that has regressed the most. Rafa used to paint the baseline consistently and always rely on his FH DTL. That's how he beat Novak multiple times at US Open. In 2012 Rafa could've still won against Novak, but again, mentally he couldn't hold onto the 5th set. He messed up. 2009 Rafa wouldn't have. Even at his best at the AO against Fed, it was never too easy. Maybe that 1 time he beat him in straight sets. But aside from that...it was always close. But this year vs Novak....he played nothing like the lead up to the final. I think it's mental with him. It's clear that Novak gives Rafa the most trouble, especially at AO and Wimbledon. You cannot do the same thing and expect a different result. You have to change things up. Not sure if Rafa ever will.
@@iohohoihhiohoihooi877 I don't think so mate.. Rafa was in his prime and also in good shape physically and game wise in AO '12.. he was just at a ridiculous level.. it's just Djoker had a more ridiculous confidence (was riding a 7 match winning streak against Nadal no less !!!), more consistent shot making and more durable in the hours and hours of grind.. I'm a Nadal fan myself I remember that match like yesterday.. heck I watched the whole 6 hrs marathon.. it really hurts but Djoker just got a bit luckier that day.
Nadal's serve was nowhere near 2010 neither his backhand so while he was good, he wasn't his best. Also Nadal lost the final mentally when he missed the easy backhand at 4-2. Djokovic proved to be mentally stronger on the day.
@@iohohoihhiohoihooi877 OK, but who says the 2009 version would've been aggressive against Novak? That's the thing people miss. Just because a player played a certain way against one opponent doesn't mean they could play that way against every opponent.
@@Marc-vk7rl We could also argue that point, since this was the most physically grueling match ever, the longest one, and It was tense right when it should have been. Federer layed and egg in the breaking set, nevermind his beautiful tennis.
Not a huge rafa fan, but this is the reason I have been watching tennis all these years. Clashes like these are timless. Will watch RF videos forever 💔
@MUFC and?? So what??? Like wtf is your point lmaoo soccer is more popular that is a known fact no need to say it. But you’re trying to make it seem like every sport is at competition with each other which it’s not. Keep in your lane because every sport is fantastic whether it be soccer, tennis, basketball, football, baseball, and even GOLF. Your sounding like a real Brad right now.
Have you seen Mats Wilander commentary in the French Open this year? It goes like this: -At the first stages of the match: Nadal is afraid of Wawrinkas ground strokes, one handed backhand is a beauty, two handed backahand is boring(I swear I heard him say this), no one can beat Wawrinka when he is on etc... -At the late stages of the match: Nadal is the greatest clay court player of all time and he's going to win the remaining majors this year (yup he also said that). I think Mats Wilander shouldn't be allowed to comment on tennis matches just because he was a great player, he's obviously very biased and can't restrain his personal preferences, someone like John McEnroe does a great job as someone who has been a great player also Mary Carilo does a good job. Overall I personally prefer the ATP guys Robbie Koenig and Jason Goodall, who are better apt to commentating a tennis match than anyone else in my opinion, they just know what to say and when to say it, especially Robbie.
Federer makes more mental mistakes also because his game is more psychologically demanding, whereas Djokovic and Nadal just has a safer low risk strategy.
In my opinion, that forehand winner @ 26:18 is easily one of the most exciting plays in tennis. The way the ball appear as though it will land out of play, but instead curves in. And that forehand shot has been replicated throughout Nadal's career.
so true. so many missed chances. Clearly he is the better player; has a habit on missing out on easy points though. Its a shame Federer is mentally so weak
Asad Noor Fed's not clearly the better player. However, these matches aren't really "destruction" either, as Nadal fans tend to say they are. Usually they're still pretty tight, despite Rafa winning.
Can we just appreciate nadal for being part of most of the greatest and most significant finals of all time. Wimbledon 2008 vs federer Australian open 2009 vs federer Australian open 2012 vs djokovic Australian open 2017 vs federer Basically all french open finals vs federer
@GTS Most overrated match ever. Both players, especially Djokovic, were nowhere near their best. It was one of the most boring finals you'll see between the big 3. It had no memorable rallies whatsoever and any point that was memorable was only in the game Federer choked 2 championship points. It's one of the most historic for sure but for quality it is not anywhere near the AO 09 F, WB 08 F or AO 2012 F.
It's like Federer never really commited himself to stick to one gameplan that worked. He always tried too many different things against Rafa and it made him confused. I believe he finally got his tactics together after like 12/13 frustrating years LOL.
I think he finally got a coach who played Nadal and defeated him ...Lubicic helped Roger to believe that he could beat Rafa from baseline.....now he doesn't make the stupid approaches he made in this match... Having said that Rafa and Roger played only 1 match post 2014 Wimbledon(start of Nadal's decline) till AO 2017 ....Roger could have had gained more confidence had he played Rafa more during that time since Roger was playing at much higher level ...... But a match like AO 2017 was needed for Roger to overcome his mental demons against Rafa.....
Federer switching to the bigger racket has made his backhand vs Nadal at least 20% better and that really was the difference in their matchups since on the FH they are equally matched. In 2015 + 2017 (didn’t play in 2018 or 2019 on hardcourts) federer knows Nadal serves to his BH and is ready to deliver a deep return to nadals BH. Then he runs around and hits a forehand hard to nadals FH which is the weaker side in defence. Problem solved, french open 2019 was a bit unlucky due to the wind kind of ruined a match between 2 players in top form, Nadal deserves that one. Federer revenge the next match, which by the way he was winning the longer points (as from 2015 onwards) than Rafa because his backhand doesn’t break down after 2 shots
Gherbi Hicham Fedal isn't the greatest rivalry due to the H2H gap but there's no doubting when it comes to the highest quality shotmaking no one matches them.
Beechaii2 I agree, I really enjoy the matches of Nadal and Federer more than I do Djokovic vs Nadal or Djokovic vs Federer, because when Nadal meets Federer we really get some incredibly unusual tennis.
I'm a great fan of fed but got to be a rafa fan, even though he has beaten fed in 2 of the greatest slams finals ever, they have respect for one another and are friends
It took a decade to Federer beat Nadal after Wimbledon 2007 in a Grand slam. And that tells how dominant Nadal was against Federer during those years, no matter how well Federer played against Nadal it did not help, and Nadal was totally in hes head just like Djokovic is now:(
He was a bit too sloppy in the decisive moments in this match. He should have won it. At the time he just didn't have the believe that he can beat Nadal best of five. A couple months before this one he crushed Nadal at the world tour finals but best of five is a different ball game.
This match highlights Rafa's mental and physical advantages over Roger Federer for most of their careers with the exception of grass courts and indoor hardcourts. Roger's problem was he could not avoid getting drawn into a lefty forehand to single handed backhand pattern often enough to beat Rafa. Sure Roger hit some incredible shots & early in the match he tried to reverse the pattern by attacking Rafa's backhand until he could attack with his forehand. This worked well enough to give Roger a break & good lead early, but Rafa kept reeling him in although he lost the first set. Rafa then upped his level & his speed & athleticism forced Roger to change tactics by serving & volleying but nothing worked. When Roger's game plan failed Rafa became more and more confident & while Roger fought until the end he never really believed he would win this match after the 2nd set. What changed this pattern was Roger improved his backhand & serve & managed to hit returns to Rafa's backhand in Melbourne in 2017. Plus Rafa got slower & Roger had finally worked out the pattern he needed to beat Rafa except on clay. Roger for all of his incredible skill & talent just didn't know how to beat Rafa in slam matches when Rafa brought his best level from after Wimbledon 2007 until the Australian Open of 2017.
2012 in particular was the best year in tennis, with each of the big 3 winning their slam and Murray winning the US Open (which pretty much anyone can win).
Agreed, I think it was one of the reasons he lost that really close final against Djokovic in 2012 Australian Open, his forehand was nowhere near penetrating enough as in say 2013 or 2010, although he was playing some fantastic tennis, physically speaking he was at peak form but his forehand let him down I'm afraid.
Federer and Nadal Derby is not only tennis match. Suffice it is clean entertainment that preserves morals and values away from vulgarity and moral destruction
Slowly working my way through every Federer Nadal match…. Fed’s forehand didn’t break down in this match; Rafa was just the better man ok the day. Amazing forehand and passing shots.
When people ask why Federer is now beating Nadal and he wasn't before show them 28:47 and the next point too. Nadal was simply way too fast back in the days. He was able to reach and return every ball and that was destroying Federer mentally. Today's Nadal is different.
2014 Rafa demolished Roger in the semis. He plays Stan in the finals. Tags lifetime was 12-0 vs Wawrinka a and never lost a set. Then Nadal get a back spasms. The 2012,2014 and 2017 AO alone, with some luck would have given Rafa a 5-1 record with only Novak really beating Rafa, quite easily. Take away his history of injuries I think Nadal hands down is the best who ever played. And also, thanks for the greatest matches in history.
2012 and 2017 were fair fights no injury and Nadal wouldn’t have won those matches anyway. Only 2014 is debatable but Wawrinka was on fire in first set before Nadal injury so highly doubt Nadal was doing enough to beat Wawrinka that day
This was during the period were Nadal had the hoodoo over Fed. Rafa simply repeatedly targeted feds backhand on all surfaces. When Fed got the larger racket head he began to show his superiority over Rafa on all surfaces apart from clay
Why this match was so interesting: both players broke multiple times. I swear, sometimes I have to wait until the 3rd or 4th set to see someone actually breaking serve ffs
Such amazing hitting by both these guys - especially Roger. But playing Rafa has always been an overwhelming deal for Roger and he ends doing a bit too much most times. You can sense him feeling a little disoriented in crucial moments and that's where Rafa comes on top almost every time. Rafa has always played Federer like he has got nothing to lose while Federer plays Rafa feeling that everything's on the line.
ok people nadal has huge talent. end of the discussion. Hes amongt the best of the world. At 16 yeras old beat costa. At 17 beat federer.Inredible achievements. King of clay(maybe not from 2015-2017 though, we'll see for 2017) Look at the young nadal 2003,2004,2005.. ppl he was amazing as much as federer was. He has very good anticpation very good speed outrageous ball spinning all rounder player except for serve maybe or volleys but still is ok and that says a lot for his passing shots and background game being very good and competitve. PPl saying he has not talent or that his game is not based on talent is going too far. for all his achievements you dont just need training or fitness or technique or hard work sry you need talent and he was as soon as he entered the pro tour so plz common he is very much talented and in his own way. Its true he always was overagessive and thats why by the years his game went less and less smoother relying a lot on physic i give you that(still you can see like everybody he has worked on tehcnique also a lot... but he is different... again...) and thats true. I believe nadal always had a bit of an attitude problem from the though guy trying to break the other but thats not how tennis should be always played and seen and its not for eveyone but it seems for him to express the beast in him, the desire to fight and fight back and win and play at his best and cover his own weakness of not being able to play like federer or djokovic , he just had to play this way, the more physical way . And -It- suits- him just fine. Again NOT FOR EVEYONE. but nadal is just like that. He is just like that folks.. like it or not. In 2017, and in many other games nadal tried to change his game like everybod yelse try to change their game for the best, but let me tell yoa little secret... nadal is not better when he is not playing aggressive because thats just how he is. thats it. Other fact, was grown to be a professionnal player but his uncle.Still, respect the man i very much like federer also. He also has his weaknesses.
francis lessard-nguyen not so much 2003 even though he scored a big win over a clay court specialist and he was only 16 then. 2004 he was unlucky to be injured,he would have had a great chance at the French.
its not that they want to skip slams but they had to do that to save their bodies from being obliterated in order to remain healthy and maintain longevity...bcoz both of them knows each others weaknesses
Craziest part for me is that Fed was still playing with a 90 sq.in Pro Staff frame. Imagine hitting prime Nadal's insane topspin with that racquet. Idk how he ever found the middle of the strings.
You can see the change after he switched to RF97. Nadal never beat him except for clay. And even that match under horrible wind was a bit closer than it looked
and he guys! Angry nadal has shown he can overpower eveybodyé Angry nadal wants that he did in many occasions. Also, i think if we speak comebacks... nadal is just more than amazing at that he's done that often and is getting better and better at the critical moments. This is a very strong positive points about nadal attitude and game. The Comebacks. I think that's enjoyable about him too. What was the federer motto again? Believe... then nadal is the perfect example of that he never let go.
29:35 That get from Nadal on match point was simply epic. Federer went probably for one of the harder (ok, not hardest, let's claim that) forehands in his career and it was still not good enough.
Maybe I overappreciate that shot, but under these circumstances it was quite hard. I mean, just look where Nadal had to dig for it. It speaks for itself. And as far as I know, Federer's fastest forehand was clocked at 104 mph. It's not such a bomb in comparison to some other players hitting 120+, but it's a great weapon still. @Fucked Yoda - very classy comment! Wow, such great and substantive response. I'm so impressed.
I've checked on that forehand. The speed was something around 93 MPH. Easily a material for winner in most cases, but not against Nadal. Distance (from touch of racquet to first bounce): about 20 meters, time: 0.48 seconds, if this is 50FPS material, the forehand took 24 frames so it's 24/50, which gives 48/100 seconds.
And also consider that Nadal isn't a lean guy like Fed or Djokovic.. he had good amount of body Mass but was fuxking fast.. His level was insanely high.. which is why the final loss hurts even more .
![[1080p 50fps] Nadal v. Federer - Australian Open 2009 Final Highlights](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/VSsH3hcCgh0/mqdefault.jpg)
![[柴犬ASMR]曼玉Manyu&小白Bai 毛发护理Spa asmr](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/0TsXQ7z2Dh4/mqdefault.jpg)
Fed fan since 2005 but Rafa is amazing to watch too. He deserves all the respect.
He can't be considered as a simple clay performer. On hard court, he reached many times a very high tennis level
Golden era at its peak...all 3 were peaking here..fed was playing unbelievable in 2011-2012..it was just coinciding with djoko and nadals peaks as well.. amazing times..will miss this so much
I disagree. FR peaked in the first half of 2017.
@@TheGraemi 2006?????
@@parmecy8525 Well pointwise. He didn't won every match against Nadal. 😉
But I think that he uped his playstyle despite his age.
Fed's golden years were 2004-2007.
2006 and 2017 were Fed's peak.
Each member of big 4 won grand slam 2012:
Djokovic AO: d. Nadal
Nadal FO: d. Djokovic
Federer W: d. Murray
Murray US: d. Djokovic
Best year for this lot
And Djokovic was there in finals 3 times
There is no “big 4”. Murray is closer to Wawrinka, Del Potro and Cilic in accomplishments than he is to Federer, Nadal or Djokovic.
Federer didn't win a grand slam in 2012.
Brahma Bull really? I thought Wimbledon was a GS tournament but maybe they changed that in 2012 and no one told me.
@@juanantoniozuleta6575 sorry buddy . My mistake. I thought he didn't win win wimby in 2012. Obviously i was wrong
Rafa hit some ridiculously good passing shots in this match
Not only in this match. I actually thought he hit more at their 2009 AO final.
@@TheTmat007 He hit more this final.
@@aleksamilosevic8792
Ok, maybe not more passing shots. And admittedly, I did not watch that entire 2012 match. But based upon highlights, it appear to me as though Rafa hit more ridiculous shots during his 2009 AO final.
@@TheTmat007 True,2009 ao final in the first 4 sets is the highest quality of any match purely shot making wise.
He did but Roger’s coverage at the net has gotten worse over the years. There have been over 100 times where Rafa passed Roger with a shot he could have gotten-no matter how good the shot is.
Like at 13:10 Roger just stood there!!
28:48 passing shot by Rafa...insane
This whole match was an insane passing shot masterclass by Rafa
He has the best passing shot ever imo
I am blessed to be a Rafa fan. Roger, no doubt, was born to play tennis. He is elegant, he is precise and, when on song, it seems like he could do no wrong. But, with Rafa, it's like a roller coaster, a tornado of emotions and, when it's over, you are relieved and bask in the glory of his victory. It is as if we also did something momentous along with him. Wishing Rafa a healthy life and a long career full of victories.
yep and then you just want to get onto that roller coaster one more time because it’s so fun loll great match btw
"When it's over, you are relieved," so true.
I am blessed to be a Djoko fan
@Redatweaks those ppl are not fans tho
Ay poo
The thing that keeps Roger in the game against Nadal is his own surgically precise shots that don't allow the opponent to push roger to get stretched and change the momentum of the point unless of course you manage to pick every one of those shots and keep returning it back to Federer.
If you look at the first set, he had frustrated Nadal. For Nadal to lose but finish 7-6 in the first set, where Roger was so utterly dominating itself shows how great a player he is.
Any other player would have lost this match 3-0 against Federer. But Nadal plays relentlessly. He can do what Roger can't and that is run for every single ball and pick every single one of them and then even return it back to the opponent in hard to pick positions. It was incredible to see how Nadal got Roger frustrated in the next 2 sets.
For Nadal to win this match 3-1 speaks volumes about his ability on the hard-court.
That first set federer took charge and was on top of the baseline especially those first 5 games. You let federer sit on top of the baseline like that it doesn’t matter who you are he’s beating you. Nadal slowed down the pace started feeding him those high backhands backed him up a little, federer got passed a few times it was over federer utterly looked lost
in tennis the emotional moment counts a lot. Federer def Djokovic in wimbledon 2012, this same Djokovic we see here like a god. Remeber this and look the numbers and matches, Federer had a mental dominance over Djokovic until 2012, it may seem pointless, but, Federer would probably have a better chance of beating Djokovic in this tournament than Nadal.
Djokovic had developed a surreal confidence against Nadal over the course of 2011 to 2012, and Nadal was suffering from it emotionally despite the effort. Djokovic was inside Nadal's head.
on the other hand, Federer everyone knows, had a mental block against Nadal that was only broken in 2017.
I think in all these years the defeats of Federer against Nadal were more a psychological problem for Federer himself. Of course, Nadal is a hero, he had all the credit for creating that insecurity in Federer's mind. But Federer was again more anxious than usual (and made a lot of choice mistakes in this match, if you look closely) simply because it was against Nadal.
anyway it was another amazing match, that classic comeback from Nadal
@@fejuncor honeslty djokovic broke that mental block when he saved like back to back match points at the us open 2 years in a row 😂
@@taxationistheft7047true, that guy is a fanboy so it makes sense why he said that
Plus mentally Nadal had the edge over Fed during this period. The mental game in top level tennis is the key, any top pro will tell you that. The fact that Nadal beat Fed from the go and always had an upper hand in their rivalry made Nadal believe he can always beat him if he can just hang in there and absorb the attacking pressure. Djoker took a while to get to that stage but post 2011 he did the same.
The fact no one is talking about 4:10 shows me how much people don’t know about tennis, he hit that flat af on the highest part of the net on a stretch with the ball being low already from behind the baseline
That was Nadal's shot.
Nadal is just the best at those wonderful passing shots where his opponent thinks, well if he gets his racket on that and gets it back it will be an easy overhead or volley but no, just when the ball is about to bounce for a second time and the shot looks impossible, then Nadal just ”UHHH” and BOOM! An incredible pass of a shot that looked hopeless. Nadal is simply the greatest passing shot player ever. No contest.
Federer would lose so many easy points approaching the net only to get hit by a passing shot, especially early in his career.
💉
So true man
With that top spin on it. Fed was slumping, and was not doing a good job by not flattening shots. Through out the game he was lobbing balls nonstop, and even though nadal did too, it was nadal that took advantage of Fed
As a djokovic fan that's what i thought too and i agree with you.
It happened almost a decade ago. These guys are still on the tour. They're fukin amazing.
One of the greatest and most enjoyable matches to watch.
amazing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
one of the best matches ever between these two legends
czcams.com/video/Z7QiqXR5PbI/video.html
He turned the match around with 2 unreal passing shots and broke federers serve and spirit with it
One of the greatest points of all time at 13:20...
NTA Design Ltd You definitely a rafa fan
greatest shot maybe, not greatest point
@@CesarRodriguez-zh7zj Argumentum ad hominem.
The one before was great too.
This match is a clear illustration of where Rafa (and Novak) got the better of Federer. Federer is an artist who can demolish his opponents with his fast fluent game. But he has his relaxing moments when he gives away cheap points and the unforced errors start piling. Rafa and Novak are much more focused throughout the match than Roger and that was the main difference imo during those years. The breakpoint 5-4 4th set shows it exactly!
Yeah, definitely know what you mean. And there's no bonuses for cool points. For every flashy point that Federer wins, there's more points where he lets his guard down and loses a point should have won, or gets ground down into an unforced error off the backhand wing. Granted Federer was still winning matches against pretty much everyone else on the tour, but at the level of the big 3 [big 4], those tiny differences at crucial moments are the difference between winning and losing big matches
In any case, Nadal returned a lot of balls, his main strategy was that... Federer is the best player in history... Djokovic at least has more winning shots, he generates angles... Nadal is very basic.
@@LuisLopez-fo6hxThere's no better passer in tennis than Nadal .
@@LuisLopez-fo6hxSo it takes a very basic man to dominate Federer? And by the way, Federer is not even the second best.
@@LuisLopez-fo6hxYour mom is basic. She had a retard son.
21:25 - Best catch by a ball boy...errr.. Ricky Ponting 😅
Ricky Ponting
17:05 the similarity to one those insane points in the 2009 final (I think at 2-1 2-2 deuce) is startling
Nice catch!
When this two legends will retire , tennis will not be same as today.
Real GOAT'S 🐐
Djokovic is the GOAT. Defeated peak nadal in the final. Also defeated him in Wimbledon and is open finals.
@@aranyaism nadal also did the same thing
Rafa was unbelievable in this tournament, goes to show how well Novak played to oust Rafa.
2009 Rafa at AO was unbelievable. 2012 was not. He really missed that aggressiveness of 2009 with the mental strength and his insane and consistent shotmaking. 2012 he would make ridiculous shots, but then he wouldn't be able to sustain his aggression and play too passive at times. 2009 he was insane at both sides of the game. The only version of Rafa that could beat Novak at Australian Open is the 2009 one. That one would have done it. Ever since than Rafa is good enough to win it, but always lacking that consistency in his shotmaking. I love Rafa, but it's clear that as much as his serve, backhand etc. has improved...it's his strength...the Forehand that has regressed the most. Rafa used to paint the baseline consistently and always rely on his FH DTL. That's how he beat Novak multiple times at US Open. In 2012 Rafa could've still won against Novak, but again, mentally he couldn't hold onto the 5th set. He messed up. 2009 Rafa wouldn't have. Even at his best at the AO against Fed, it was never too easy. Maybe that 1 time he beat him in straight sets. But aside from that...it was always close. But this year vs Novak....he played nothing like the lead up to the final. I think it's mental with him. It's clear that Novak gives Rafa the most trouble, especially at AO and Wimbledon. You cannot do the same thing and expect a different result. You have to change things up. Not sure if Rafa ever will.
@@iohohoihhiohoihooi877 I don't think so mate.. Rafa was in his prime and also in good shape physically and game wise in AO '12.. he was just at a ridiculous level.. it's just Djoker had a more ridiculous confidence (was riding a 7 match winning streak against Nadal no less !!!), more consistent shot making and more durable in the hours and hours of grind.. I'm a Nadal fan myself I remember that match like yesterday.. heck I watched the whole 6 hrs marathon.. it really hurts but Djoker just got a bit luckier that day.
Nadal's serve was nowhere near 2010 neither his backhand so while he was good, he wasn't his best. Also Nadal lost the final mentally when he missed the easy backhand at 4-2.
Djokovic proved to be mentally stronger on the day.
@@iohohoihhiohoihooi877 OK, but who says the 2009 version would've been aggressive against Novak? That's the thing people miss. Just because a player played a certain way against one opponent doesn't mean they could play that way against every opponent.
@@truthseekertitan3986 Yes, it's right to admit that at AO '12 Nole beat a top version of Rafa. One of the few times he has.
What a championiship with two notorious semi final and maybe one of the greatest final of the AO between Rafa and Nole
Maybe one of the greatest finals of AO ???? It was greatest final of all times.
@@milanvesovic1703 i would go with the 2009 final as the greatest final of AO
@@Marc-vk7rl 2012 5h set was wayyyyyyy better than in that one
@@guarana6245 yeah the 5th set, but not the 4 before
@@Marc-vk7rl We could also argue that point, since this was the most physically grueling match ever, the longest one, and It was tense right when it should have been. Federer layed and egg in the breaking set, nevermind his beautiful tennis.
An amazing match full of high quality shot making from both players.
these highlights are a real treat...perfectly edited
Not a huge rafa fan, but this is the reason I have been watching tennis all these years. Clashes like these are timless. Will watch RF videos forever 💔
Imagine today's Nadal without all those knee injuries, he would be a monster on hard courts as well.
His backhand today makes his 2012 backhand look like an under-12's shot.
@@connorism69 his backhand is/was more raw power than technique
No... He sucka on hardcourts in earlier too..
@@connorism69 No lol. On slower courts his 2012 BH was great.
@@user-tk3hb6ui2o Nadal defeated Frauderer at AO 09 12 14....Nadal was better hard court player than Federer during 2009 -2014...
Nadal has the best passing shots
Even Djokovic struggles when Federer approaches the net
federer needs to hit to Nadal's backhand then approach
no question...he has the best shots of all time on ANY surface
that 09 final was something special tho
Yep. I agree.
So was that semifinal against Verdasco.
@@mutton7891 one of the best matches in tennis history
CZcams in 2020: wanna watch 8 year old Fedal mach?
Me: Ok, let's go..
Of course
@MUFC and?? So what??? Like wtf is your point lmaoo soccer is more popular that is a known fact no need to say it. But you’re trying to make it seem like every sport is at competition with each other which it’s not. Keep in your lane because every sport is fantastic whether it be soccer, tennis, basketball, football, baseball, and even GOLF. Your sounding like a real Brad right now.
czcams.com/video/Ku18oUyGI_Q/video.html
@@RAUL7487 czcams.com/video/Ku18oUyGI_Q/video.html
@MUFC czcams.com/video/Ku18oUyGI_Q/video.html
2012 was probably the one and only year we saw all members of the big four playing at their very best at the same time.
True, all in semi and almost all matches gone to five sets except this one. And then the final was legendary!
...yes each of them won one GS a piece XD (AO: Nole, RG: Rafa, Wim: Fed, USO: Murray). Great year!
2012 is an iconic year for tennis and just in general.
Federer wasn't at this best.
@@masters.1000 You are wrong. 2012 was the last time Roger Federer beat Novak Djokovic in a Grand Slam.
The commentators have to bow in the end to the genius and brilliance of NADAL 💪🏼❤️
Thank god somebody uploaded this without Mats Wilander's commentary.
God he's sooooo annoying!
Dr. Mantis Toboggan .🚤🚲
Hahaha yea! :D
Have you seen Mats Wilander commentary in the French Open this year? It goes like this:
-At the first stages of the match: Nadal is afraid of Wawrinkas ground strokes, one handed backhand is a beauty, two handed backahand is boring(I swear I heard him say this), no one can beat Wawrinka when he is on etc...
-At the late stages of the match: Nadal is the greatest clay court player of all time and he's going to win the remaining majors this year (yup he also said that).
I think Mats Wilander shouldn't be allowed to comment on tennis matches just because he was a great player, he's obviously very biased and can't restrain his personal preferences, someone like John McEnroe does a great job as someone who has been a great player also Mary Carilo does a good job.
Overall I personally prefer the ATP guys Robbie Koenig and Jason Goodall, who are better apt to commentating a tennis match than anyone else in my opinion, they just know what to say and when to say it, especially Robbie.
But the highlights are ruined by the audio being slightly out of sync with the video
Federer makes so many key mental mistakes in the biggest moments. Talent wise, there's nobody better than him.
But talent is not everything. Federer is the weakest mentally of the big 3.
@@manidev12 True. He always crying like baby.
@@victorray9369 Not like a baby, like a man with passion for the game. Moron..
Talent is not everything
Federer makes more mental mistakes also because his game is more psychologically demanding, whereas Djokovic and Nadal just has a safer low risk strategy.
In my opinion, that forehand winner @ 26:18 is easily one of the most exciting plays in tennis. The way the ball appear as though it will land out of play, but instead curves in. And that forehand shot has been replicated throughout Nadal's career.
There were countless rallies where Roger showed who was boss, but he caves under pressure during the biggest & most crucial specific points!
@@edkiely2712
What does that have to do with the point I made regarding Nadal's forehand winner? Smh.
This is just a collection of really frustrating points to watch if you're a Federer fan
Truth level...9999
Which is true of most of their matches from 08-13, and anything on clay lol.
so true. so many missed chances. Clearly he is the better player; has a habit on missing out on easy points though. Its a shame Federer is mentally so weak
1:02 ''Clearly the better player, so mentally weak''. I mean, what can the guy do better when Nadal's playing his best? Learn sport.
Asad Noor Fed's not clearly the better player. However, these matches aren't really "destruction" either, as Nadal fans tend to say they are. Usually they're still pretty tight, despite Rafa winning.
Can we just appreciate nadal for being part of most of the greatest and most significant finals of all time.
Wimbledon 2008 vs federer
Australian open 2009 vs federer
Australian open 2012 vs djokovic
Australian open 2017 vs federer
Basically all french open finals vs federer
No I can’t
Wimbledon 2008 has more significance than 2019 imo
@GTS Most overrated match ever. Both players, especially Djokovic, were nowhere near their best. It was one of the most boring finals you'll see between the big 3. It had no memorable rallies whatsoever and any point that was memorable was only in the game Federer choked 2 championship points. It's one of the most historic for sure but for quality it is not anywhere near the AO 09 F, WB 08 F or AO 2012 F.
How sad we will never ever see this quality of tennis again
It's like Federer never really commited himself to stick to one gameplan that worked. He always tried too many different things against Rafa and it made him confused. I believe he finally got his tactics together after like 12/13 frustrating years LOL.
I think he finally got a coach who played Nadal and defeated him ...Lubicic helped Roger to believe that he could beat Rafa from baseline.....now he doesn't make the stupid approaches he made in this match...
Having said that Rafa and Roger played only 1 match post 2014 Wimbledon(start of Nadal's decline) till AO 2017 ....Roger could have had gained more confidence had he played Rafa more during that time since Roger was playing at much higher level ......
But a match like AO 2017 was needed for Roger to overcome his mental demons against Rafa.....
Federer switching to the bigger racket has made his backhand vs Nadal at least 20% better and that really was the difference in their matchups since on the FH they are equally matched. In 2015 + 2017 (didn’t play in 2018 or 2019 on hardcourts) federer knows Nadal serves to his BH and is ready to deliver a deep return to nadals BH. Then he runs around and hits a forehand hard to nadals FH which is the weaker side in defence. Problem solved, french open 2019 was a bit unlucky due to the wind kind of ruined a match between 2 players in top form, Nadal deserves that one. Federer revenge the next match, which by the way he was winning the longer points (as from 2015 onwards) than Rafa because his backhand doesn’t break down after 2 shots
@@mattDJmel Nadal losing a step and his forehand not being anywhere near the shot it was at his peak helped too.
Point at 17:14 is nearly identical to one in the 2009 final. Crazy coincidence.
The one in 2009 is better. A lot better. :D But yeah, looks similar.
The 2009 point is the best point in their rivalry and in my opinion one of the best points/rallies of all time.
Gherbi Hicham Fedal isn't the greatest rivalry due to the H2H gap but there's no doubting when it comes to the highest quality shotmaking no one matches them.
Beechaii2 I agree, I really enjoy the matches of Nadal and Federer more than I do Djokovic vs Nadal or Djokovic vs Federer, because when Nadal meets Federer we really get some incredibly unusual tennis.
I thought so too.
13:03 how Rafa won that point is beyond, the type of point only he could manage to win.
And the reaction from his team is class too...
an iconic shot symbolic of Nadal’s dominance over Federer
I love how hist team point something with the finger and a smile
13:17 Hollyshit !!
I'm a great fan of fed but got to be a rafa fan, even though he has beaten fed in 2 of the greatest slams finals ever, they have respect for one another and are friends
Federer had to play for years his best tennis against Nadal but even this couldn't help for Roger. Here you have the example .
It took a decade to Federer beat Nadal after Wimbledon 2007 in a Grand slam.
And that tells how dominant Nadal was against Federer during those years, no matter how well Federer played against Nadal it did not help, and Nadal was totally in hes head just like Djokovic is now:(
But in récent Time federer has nadal under controll so good Ending Overall for fed
He was a bit too sloppy in the decisive moments in this match. He should have won it. At the time he just didn't have the believe that he can beat Nadal best of five. A couple months before this one he crushed Nadal at the world tour finals but best of five is a different ball game.
2012 was the greatest year in Tennis History :D #PrimeTime
AO - Novak
RG - Nadal
WC - Fed
US - Murray
I think it’s 2009
@@ErikCB912 hahaha nope
@@rafabaur2836 hahaha yes
Yesss by far. So many great matches over the year with the AO final being arguably the greatest match ever.
After Corona we see legendary game again
Stay home stay safe
13:10 :O respect
excuse me are you Novak?
That was just outrageous from Rafa
@@blackrockkk ? Why novak ?
czcams.com/video/Ku18oUyGI_Q/video.html
@@blackrockkk czcams.com/video/Ku18oUyGI_Q/video.html
This match highlights Rafa's mental and physical advantages over Roger Federer for most of their careers with the exception of grass courts and indoor hardcourts. Roger's problem was he could not avoid getting drawn into a lefty forehand to single handed backhand pattern often enough to beat Rafa. Sure Roger hit some incredible shots & early in the match he tried to reverse the pattern by attacking Rafa's backhand until he could attack with his forehand. This worked well enough to give Roger a break & good lead early, but Rafa kept reeling him in although he lost the first set. Rafa then upped his level & his speed & athleticism forced Roger to change tactics by serving & volleying but nothing worked. When Roger's game plan failed Rafa became more and more confident & while Roger fought until the end he never really believed he would win this match after the 2nd set. What changed this pattern was Roger improved his backhand & serve & managed to hit returns to Rafa's backhand in Melbourne in 2017. Plus Rafa got slower & Roger had finally worked out the pattern he needed to beat Rafa except on clay. Roger for all of his incredible skill & talent just didn't know how to beat Rafa in slam matches when Rafa brought his best level from after Wimbledon 2007 until the Australian Open of 2017.
Federer might be the more stylish player to watch. But when Nadal is at his best, his play makings are also awesome.
the fact that djokovic was rated higher then this 2 guys are just mindblowing. he even won the particular tournament. easily the best era in tennis
2012 in particular was the best year in tennis, with each of the big 3 winning their slam and Murray winning the US Open (which pretty much anyone can win).
If Djokovic wins Wimbledon 2023,
It won't be Federer's slam anymore 😌
@@Noleka154 this aged like milk
@@user-vv4gn9fo2jmost finals lost against Nole you mean? 0-3?
When Federer cracks a backhand, i have never heard that sound from any other player. The sound is so clean and powerful sounding. Remarkable.
Nadal's forehand was way better (and Federer's backhand was way worse) in this match than in the 2017 final
Yes!
Because he is in prime here..its obvious.
Agreed, I think it was one of the reasons he lost that really close final against Djokovic in 2012 Australian Open, his forehand was nowhere near penetrating enough as in say 2013 or 2010, although he was playing some fantastic tennis, physically speaking he was at peak form but his forehand let him down I'm afraid.
No. The reason Nadal lost in AO 2012 final was because he mentally lost it when he missed that easy backhand at 4-2.
bananapotato
2009 AO Nadal was even better.
When Rafa's and Fed's highlights are always up to 30 minutes. :p
Two true sport legends,its logical.
Rafa after winning the match clapping for roger while he was leaving the court. That's why I love Rafa more. Respect.........
So true - Nadal just genuinely nicer guy, that respect
Nadal and Federer are both nice people. Have you watched Fed's sneaker shopping with complex? Doesn't that seem like a nice guy to ya?
Yeah Fed is a nice guy too, but Nadal is just all class for me
JJSLOW fed has all the class, dumbass.
@@goxaviergo11 Another ignorant Fedtard reason for the hatred towards Fed such an imbecile
Federer and Nadal Derby is not only tennis match. Suffice it is clean entertainment that preserves morals and values away from vulgarity and moral destruction
20:40 exact same point as AO 2017!!
That's crazy lol. Good catch
The point that cost Nadal the AO 2017 title :(
Yes, when Federer got the second break to 5-3 in the 5th set in AO 2017. You are right.
Yes!!!
yesssss.
Fuck!! Even the match ain't live and I still hold my breath with each point, Roger. 😂😂
No me canso de mirar Nadal-Federer grandiosos juegos
Espectaculares los juegos Nadal -Federer sin igual hacen historia
NADAL Y DJOKOVIC BASAN SU JUEGO EN LA FUERZA FISICA Y MENTAL , EN FEDERER DOMINA EL TALENTO
Slowly working my way through every Federer Nadal match….
Fed’s forehand didn’t break down in this match; Rafa was just the better man ok the day. Amazing forehand and passing shots.
this is just so good
This match was vital. The loss made Federer very successful 2012.
Federer, always being a warming up for Nadal.
When people ask why Federer is now beating Nadal and he wasn't before show them 28:47 and the next point too. Nadal was simply way too fast back in the days. He was able to reach and return every ball and that was destroying Federer mentally. Today's Nadal is different.
Beautiful tennis back in the day
this is one of the best grand slam of the decade.. rafa vs federer djokoic vs murrey djokovc vs nadal all matches were epic
2014 Rafa demolished Roger in the semis. He plays Stan in the finals. Tags lifetime was 12-0 vs Wawrinka a and never lost a set. Then Nadal get a back spasms. The 2012,2014 and 2017 AO alone, with some luck would have given Rafa a 5-1 record with only Novak really beating Rafa, quite easily. Take away his history of injuries I think Nadal hands down is the best who ever played. And also, thanks for the greatest matches in history.
2012 and 2017 were fair fights no injury and Nadal wouldn’t have won those matches anyway. Only 2014 is debatable but Wawrinka was on fire in first set before Nadal injury so highly doubt Nadal was doing enough to beat Wawrinka that day
I thought I was watching the 2017 Australian open final- imagine my surprise when Rafa hit the winning shot at the end ! 🤣😭
Last 2 games in the match
Holly shit nadal was amazing
They are both brilliant! I so hope we see them both in 2022!!!
Rafa's strokes have actually improved since this match. He's just a step slower.
this is what I feel as well
His FH is signifincalty worse. His BH is better on fast surfaces now and his 1st serve is better.
@@aleksamilosevic8792 All true.
Insane level of play, and they're good friends too- (but after a short while, they just focus on the game).
Friends terminology is bullshit. Its all created for advertisement
What a game!!!
This was during the period were Nadal had the hoodoo over Fed. Rafa simply repeatedly targeted feds backhand on all surfaces. When Fed got the larger racket head he began to show his superiority over Rafa on all surfaces apart from clay
Or Nadal just got slower and lost some of his physical attributes.
The last grandslam where all the big 4 were in semis.
Aman now 2019 French open
@@wedd44 No, he means the big 4, not the top 4 seeded players.
Welcome to Wimbledon 2019, TBH there is no big 4, it was always and will be the big 3 only.
@@osamabinlovin7182 there was a big 4, like it or not
charlie172011 there wasn’t, Murray is nowhere near other 3’s level
Why this match was so interesting: both players broke multiple times. I swear, sometimes I have to wait until the 3rd or 4th set to see someone actually breaking serve ffs
¡¡ Dos tenistas extraordinarios !!
My favorite part is when Roger hits every single backhand short and to the center of the court. 👌
Kace Heiner And when Nadal's top spin forehand penetrates the backhand mhmm my favourite
Such amazing hitting by both these guys - especially Roger. But playing Rafa has always been an overwhelming deal for Roger and he ends doing a bit too much most times. You can sense him feeling a little disoriented in crucial moments and that's where Rafa comes on top almost every time. Rafa has always played Federer like he has got nothing to lose while Federer plays Rafa feeling that everything's on the line.
20:40 this point is identical with Federer's break point this year at AO 4-3 in the fifth
Excelente partido el de estos dos grandes maestros.
ok people nadal has huge talent. end of the discussion. Hes amongt the best of the world. At 16 yeras old beat costa. At 17 beat federer.Inredible achievements. King of clay(maybe not from 2015-2017 though, we'll see for 2017) Look at the young nadal 2003,2004,2005.. ppl he was amazing as much as federer was. He has very good anticpation very good speed outrageous ball spinning all rounder player except for serve maybe or volleys but still is ok and that says a lot for his passing shots and background game being very good and competitve. PPl saying he has not talent or that his game is not based on talent is going too far. for all his achievements you dont just need training or fitness or technique or hard work sry you need talent and he was as soon as he entered the pro tour so plz common he is very much talented and in his own way. Its true he always was overagessive and thats why by the years his game went less and less smoother relying a lot on physic i give you that(still you can see like everybody he has worked on tehcnique also a lot... but he is different... again...) and thats true. I believe nadal always had a bit of an attitude problem from the though guy trying to break the other but thats not how tennis should be always played and seen and its not for eveyone but it seems for him to express the beast in him, the desire to fight and fight back and win and play at his best and cover his own weakness of not being able to play like federer or djokovic , he just had to play this way, the more physical way . And -It- suits- him just fine. Again NOT FOR EVEYONE. but nadal is just like that. He is just like that folks.. like it or not. In 2017, and in many other games nadal tried to change his game like everybod yelse try to change their game for the best, but let me tell yoa little secret... nadal is not better when he is not playing aggressive because thats just how he is. thats it. Other fact, was grown to be a professionnal player but his uncle.Still, respect the man i very much like federer also. He also has his weaknesses.
francis lessard-nguyen not so much 2003 even though he scored a big win over a clay court specialist and he was only 16 then. 2004 he was unlucky to be injured,he would have had a great chance at the French.
francis lessard-nguyen “also ok volleys” His volleys are insanely good. Almost as good as Fed’s.
its not that they want to skip slams but they had to do that to save their bodies from being obliterated in order to remain healthy and maintain longevity...bcoz both of them knows each others weaknesses
Craziest part for me is that Fed was still playing with a 90 sq.in Pro Staff frame. Imagine hitting prime Nadal's insane topspin with that racquet. Idk how he ever found the middle of the strings.
You can see the change after he switched to RF97. Nadal never beat him except for clay. And even that match under horrible wind was a bit closer than it looked
Is it just me, or did the crowd applaud more when the ballboy caught the tennis ball from Federer than any other point
My favorite two players
What a match, what a level👏👏👏👏👏😳😉😘
At 20:42 federer breaks to serve for the 2017 title!
yes man same point
Someday I`ll show my kids this vids.
he played so perfect every time when meet Federer
the little steps that nadal does every time federer is about to serve are so unsportsmanlike
As a Federer fan ,I only watch first set😁
Hahahah every fan does like that😂😂😂😂😂
Nadal é incrível!!!
Many shots are just RIDICULOUS
LO MAXIMO ADMIRABLE ES POR LAS LESIONES CONQUE JUEGA Y SU ESPIRITU GLADIADOR. BENDICIONES.
and he guys! Angry nadal has shown he can overpower eveybodyé Angry nadal wants that he did in many occasions. Also, i think if we speak comebacks... nadal is just more than amazing at that he's done that often and is getting better and better at the critical moments. This is a very strong positive points about nadal attitude and game. The Comebacks. I think that's enjoyable about him too. What was the federer motto again? Believe... then nadal is the perfect example of that he never let go.
15:55 the way those people react is like they're watching a horror movie😂
Một trong những trận đấu hay nhất lịch sử, rất điển hình phong cách siêu chiến binh của Nadal, không thể xem ai khác ngoài Nadal được !
Love these two ❤
29:35 That get from Nadal on match point was simply epic. Federer went probably for one of the harder (ok, not hardest, let's claim that) forehands in his career and it was still not good enough.
ToomcioZioomcio Hardest forehands in his career? Really? 😆 You definitely are wrong. That was a medium fast shot.
Maybe I overappreciate that shot, but under these circumstances it was quite hard. I mean, just look where Nadal had to dig for it. It speaks for itself.
And as far as I know, Federer's fastest forehand was clocked at 104 mph. It's not such a bomb in comparison to some other players hitting 120+, but it's a great weapon still.
@Fucked Yoda - very classy comment! Wow, such great and substantive response. I'm so impressed.
29.02 one of nadal's hardest forehand and luck in his carreer.. :P
the salt is real from fed fanboys
I've checked on that forehand. The speed was something around 93 MPH. Easily a material for winner in most cases, but not against Nadal.
Distance (from touch of racquet to first bounce): about 20 meters, time: 0.48 seconds, if this is 50FPS material, the forehand took 24 frames so it's 24/50, which gives 48/100 seconds.
I feel like 2012 nadal had the best footwork
unbeliebably nimble footed...so light on his feet. Fed fan here.
And also consider that Nadal isn't a lean guy like Fed or Djokovic.. he had good amount of body Mass but was fuxking fast.. His level was insanely high.. which is why the final loss hurts even more .
Trishit Dutta he choked the final
Nope he was outplayed.
What a match. They should quadruple the price of the tickets to watch these two play against each other. So many great points in the match.
Roger Es Impresionante tu Talento y elegancia....