A series of leaked e-mails between climate scientists is casting a cloud over the Climate Change Summit. Kimberly Dozier reports whether scientists fudged numbers to over-exaggerate climate change.
Science Talk TV and guess where they got all that money from? Climate change hahaha. You’re an idiot to believe we can control climate change. Climate will change and has always been changing before we even got on this planet. It will keep changing when we are gone too if that ever happens.
@@Quietman66j Sorry Charlie, but you cannot keep pushing the date for supposed climate catastrophes into the future and expect people to keep falling for the hysteria. The Piltdown Man fooled them for thirty years too.
The main issue is: If it is urgent to act, empower the people. Give us tax credits for planting trees. Don't tax us... You just want to grab more power.
EXACTLY. My god. When people say that oh it’s the hottest month ever they are lying to themselves as there is no records showing the temperature of the millions of years prior to scientists beginning to record data. Also, 50 years ago there was such thing as CLIMATE COOLING?! This being further disproven when you realise Greenland never used to be covered in ice. Lol. “Co2 is bad for the ozone layer and is making it bigger”. ha. So basically we should get rid of co2 and kill ourselves. Yes, this is what has happened to society. Recently studies conducted showed that the ozone layer while got smaller and was healing itself yet that’s also a bad thing? My god. Our friken scientists are deluded.
@@charlie8508 Its definitely not all scientists, but the ones that are polled are specificely picked because the polling is biased towards one opinion, that being that global warming/climate change exists, but there are a lot of scientists (who actually qualify as one) who deny climate change (action) like Piers Corbyn, notoriously known for being the brother of the socialist Labour party leader in the UK.
First the world was going to freeze, next the world was going to heat up, now weather is going to change. Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me.
Toon She Weather already HAS changed. Burning Australia is so dry, the Amazon Rain Forest (Lungs of the Earth) too. Drowning Polar Bears. Ever worsening storms! The satellite weather on TV news changed. Rain used to approach Seattle from Alaska by a slow-moving Counter-Clockwise rotation over the Pacific. Now it's Clockwise and quicker. That made a CHANGE, FOR SURE. Last summer the Seattle blackberries never ripened. They did rot though. Fermented premature berries. Blame that on nature? Pretty damn irresponsible!
PC__ ' how is it impossible to not believe in global warming if the same people who told me the world is going to warm up is the same ones who said the world is going to freeze . And the same ones who said the Australia fires was because of gloable warning when In reality , a lot of people got arrested for starting the fires them selves .
The solution isn’t your money, the solution is the threat of your money taken so you would take the necessary actions to solve the problem. How else will you be motivated to save the environment?
blakestilltippin yes. Yes it is. The law is also blackmail, and you know the punishment for every individual crime so it serves as a threat that scares you into not committing crimes.
duustin crawford Does the doctor tax us for things not our fault?... Like carbon tax... even tho corporations produce most carbon... Yet it’s BS since the earth still needs carbon it’s a building block of life...
Bill Gates predicted that we needed to be ready for coronavirus. Nobody listened. Now he is saying that we have to address climate change, will anyone listen? czcams.com/video/7A4npk1Deug/video.html
Cameron Greaves well yeah but it doesn’t change this fast, within 30 years half of all coral reefs have died, rainforests are getting destroyed, there is too much CO2 and it’s causing animals to die
@None your Beeswax what my name is Wow U luv your ignorance dont ya? Climate effects the whole planet! How the hell is temp rise a scam? Think next time...
@None your Beeswax what my name is Maybe this is too complicated for U.. But I'll try and make this simple... No matter how much money or tax is taken nothing except real climate chg will actually chg the planet's temp. Since this is ALREADY happened it is not a hoax, or scam, or whatever excuse U try to come up with. Because if wasnt real we wouldnt have man made GW. But since this is real and we R getting warmer we need drastic chgs NOW! EVERYONE has to sacrifice if we want to prevent suffering and that means financial sacrifices too... So ya its going to mean money has to be spent,,, the sucking off the planet resources for free is over, and we need to spare no one's wallet to save the planet
@None your Beeswax what my name is Yes I see this pattern a lot... Its sad that your reading comprehension skills need work. I can see how our education sys has failed us. Your faked English skills attack ,and U just dont understand my superior intellect compared to 97% of the world's Scientist phony argument is typ denier tactic.... Its weak it definitely lacks any intellectual come back but Ive learned to expect that. After all, U cant argue with Sci, as U either have no understanding of it or U R in denial of it. 2nd I used your own statements and U failed to back it up with anything! "oh U R just too complex for us to understand your deep understanding of the deep state or secret tax ripoff which U and dwindling few believers understand! Give me a break... I gave U a FACTUAL statement which U could not refute so U deflected because U CANT WIN.... So sad so weak, yet so obvious that U got nothing to go on... 1 GW is man made and REAL 2 Its not some tax scam its SCI and its going to cost those who took advantage of the planet for generations 3 U lost here thats easy to see
@None your Beeswax what my name is What part of Global Warming is science dont U get? Academic researchers dont get paid more or less because they say something against your opinion! This conspiracy crap is the real conspiracy in itself! Scientist tell the truth from the natural laws of the universe... These right wing conspiracy talking points are created by ad and marketing consultants just to motivate the science illiterate... Science is not politics its FACT! All these conspiracy GW deniers claim its a money scam R pawns for big oil and other interest... The SCIENCE IS REAL and undeniable BECAUSE it uses proven SCIENCE... GW is real and its largely man made it will get much worse if we dont make drastic chgs NOW!
JohnFruscianteMarkLa mate the fuckin politicians in Australia are putting 2 billion dollars towards this so called climate change. That’s my fucking money going towards retards that believe this shit. I’m 100% with you
@@MrWizardofozzz - Most of his predictions did come true. Gore was a chump by hiding the time lines as he was doing the political thing rather then being fully transparent.
If anything you would expect the government to deny climate change so the oil companies can benefit and continue pumping money into their economies. The taxes are a deterrent to stop people releasing unnecessary amounts of carbon. And yeah they generally work unless you have any better ideas
Meng Anak I genuinely hate smug people like you going around saying wAKe uP or oPEn yoUr EYes without giving evidence. “You’re brainwashed” is not good enough to carry your argument.
Jaspal S because at the time, Obama was president of one of the leading carbon emitting country in the world. Governments need to make plans to reduce carbon emissions and the head of state is important for that.
@@victorochoa4205 Obama was one of the biggest supporters of addressing climate chg,,, U may hating him but U R just making crap up to fit your beliefs
18,000 years ago, where i'm sitting now was under an ice sheet more than a kilometer thick. it had all gone before humans could possibly have influenced that melt. climate is subject to perpetual change NATURALLY!
Sure, there’s natural climate change, but what’s happening now is way too quick to be natural. I’m sorry, but if that’s your logic, I’d better say that your parents didn’t have a choice to have you, because humans have had the natural instinct to reproduce for thousands of years. That’s simply not true. A long time ago isn’t now. Climate change may have happened naturally then, but not now, just as reproduction happened instinctively, but now people choose to have children, or not to have children.
Vladimir Gurevich yeah we can prove. Should the earth rise 3 degrees within 30 years? no! That is not just natural. Now if you don’t do some research, you can go and make your flat earth even worse, idiot
So I guess when we reach “zero carbon emissions” and plants and trees don’t have what they need to survive and thrive and, oh I don’t know - STAY GREEN!!! , the “Green Movement” will be rebranded as the “Brown Movement”
hundreds of variables to predict climate change. climatologists use about 3, not enough to make an honest prediction.all they have to do to keep the grants coming.
Interesting.. which study shows that? I'd love to read it. Man it's refreshing that you found some proof. With it you can blow the lid off this conspiracy. Share it brother and you'll be famous.
@@louiscypher1001 changing it from "global warming" to "climate change" is enough to see its political BS and actually looking at how the planets climate changes all the damn time makes me even more skeptical. In the 50's it was a big freeze and then it changes as soon as all that OPEC bullshit happens. The plants are loving it though they suck up majority of the CO2 in the spring time according to NASA. So idk man but politicians like to keep issues going so they have talking points.
@@louiscypher1001 Earth has seen CO2 levels hundred times higher than today. It never melted away but has been covered with ice many times. We are living in a short break between the ice ages. Blowing the lid off this conspiracy does not require one being Einstein. Just not being a square idiot like you.
Ten years later and no new cuts to emissions on China or India's part... But remember they think it is real. What part? Obviously the part where humans have little impact going by how many more coal plants they're building.
@Delike el Ducce "Can't be fake if it is real" Absolutely! But also other way around is true: "Can't be real if it is fake" All we have to do is to check the facts: www.heartland.org/_template-assets/documents/CCR/CCR-II/CCR-II-Full.pdf Suck up and shut up! Lol
@@louiscypher1001 Ha-ha-ha A louisy ignoramus tries to teach scientists. LOL :-) There is no consensus among climatologists. Not all of them are prostitutes. Actually if you take your time and carefully read scientific papers beyond abstract, you'll see that most of them understand that AGW is a hoax. In many cases fine print in the articles states things exactly opposite to what's said in the abstract. All scientists are people and need money to live. For physicists it's easier because they do not have to compromise their integrity. Climatologists have to make hard choice - live like a lying weasel or face "The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune" Once again: IS IT SO HARD TO POST ONE! ONE! ONE LINK TO AN ARTICLE THAT YOU TRUST? That makes an attempt to prove AGW. What does it take to make you do it? Kiss your tuches or kick you butt? LOL!
@checkyoursources Where exactly would you like to start you temps from? You say from the 70's. It was actually coolest in 85. So from 75 to 85 the temps went down. The last decade doesn't show any warming. In fact, it clearly shows no warming at all. And by the time we got to Dec 2011 we were only .2 deg. warmer than the median temps in the mid 70's. -UAH Dec 2011
@@louiscypher1001 You know, lousy, you can read anything, but after climategate one has to be careful. I've mentioned already that during just 3 years in the beginning of 90s Canada has shut down almost half of it' weather stations. And what a coincidence! Exactly during the same 3 years average temperature readings in Canada skyrocketed 1.5 degrees C! This corresponds to 0.5 degrees C of high latitude northern hemisphere. Afraid, if they reopen all the stations AGW will go up in flames (or maybe down into freeze?)
@@vladimirgurevich8415 - Steven Harper the leader of Canada suppressed its scientists and environmental research during that era as his party was heavily financed by the energy sector. www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/canadian-scientists-open-about-how-their-government-silenced-science-180961942/ -
Alright here,s the truth yes we have climate change every year for my entire life I have been surviveing climate change and so have everyone it's called seasons.
Every cooling cycle of an extended period is inevitably followed by a warning cycle. In the past, these were always known by their less scientific names as: winter and summer. I guess it takes climatologists to make that determination now days. Whoda thunk? $$$$$$$$ KA CHING!
Your mixing up weather (what I see out the window) with Climate change (the chances of what your seeing out the window of happening). Glad I could help..
i'll be naughty here and say that really it's just a freak of nature and geology that all that nasty carbon is now locked up underground. all we're doing is putting it back where it was originally!
@MrOTLChamp "was just 40 yrs ago that the scientist said we were going into an iceage" 1) 1970s ice age predictions were predominantly media based. The majority of peer reviewed research at the time predicted warming due to increasing CO2. A survey of peer reviewed scientific papers from 1965 to 1979 show that few papers predicted global cooling (7 in total). Significantly more papers (42 in total) predicted global warming (Peterson 2008).
* July 2020 was the second-hottest month ever recorded on Earth. * June 2020 was the second-hottest June of all time. * May 2020 was the hottest May of all time. * April 2020 was the second-hottest April of all time. * March 2020 was the second-hottest March of all time. * February 2020 was the second-hottest February of all time. * January 2020 was the hottest January of all time.
@MrOTLChamp Are you not shocked that the US healthcare system gives people a life expectancy only just equal to Chile's national helath service? In every country with both systems the cost per person is cheaper if the healthcare comes from tax money than if people choose private. The lack of regulation by govt led to the financial meltdown.
Late 70's it was acid rain then in the 80's it was ozone depletion now it is global warming or man made climate change. They have to keep changing the name. I know that there is air and water pollution which needs to be addressed.
@checkyoursources " The lack of regulation by govt led to the financial meltdown." On the contrary. It was the governments involvement with the loan process (namely, lowering the standards needed to qualify for the home loans) that caused the meltdown. Banks were forced to give loans to people that couldn't afford them. In fact, Obama was representing ACORN in a lawsuit against CITIBank, for not lending to these people that didn't qualify. They used race as the leverage to get a settlement.
None your Beeswax what my name is Co2 is an insulating gas. Which means it traps heat. More Co2=more trapped heat. Humans= produce Co2 Simple as that. Ignore the graphs, fake or not. Use your fucking common sense.
@VeryEvilPettingZoo Look at weather record. When it's long enough - it's climate. And 150 years long record tells me that you are either a bullshitter on salary or an idiot.
Yeah global warming isn't real. All those records of having winters where my area got over 3' of snow every winter are the ones that are faulse. These mild winters where we're lucky to get 1 snow storm that has over a foot of snow is how its always been. God I can't beleive I let the media make me beleive that the seasons are warmer then they were 20 years ago.
Ok. I see you have an inability to look outside the US. Cities really are going underwater in a matter of years. Take the Maldives for example. They are predicted to completely sink in a few years. The Thai city of Bangkok is not going to survive much longer. You see, Greenland may even be green in the future. Looking at the US, if we don’t stop the ice caps from melting quickly, Florida may be an island and New Orleans may be gone.
@MrOTLChamp "so that their readings would measure higher than normal" - wrong again: Independent studies using different software, different methods, and different data sets yield very similar results. The increase in temperatures since 1975 is a consistent feature of all reconstructions. This increase cannot be explained as an artifact of the adjustment process, the decrease in station numbers, or other non-climatological factors.
it is unreal to me. the evidence is right here in our faces and this man is actually trying to tell us were reading it wrong?? how is this taken out of context?? these statements dont leave any room for interpretation. so how are WE getting it wrong
Mike Wible It’s real. Look outside of the USA. We have rising sea levels due to the ice caps melting at higher levels than that of 1950. Countries are going to go underwater. Ok, I see that you can’t look at South Asia. That’s fine. At least take note that Louisiana’s going underwater. In fact, the USA and Canada are the world’s coldest countries. Temperatures elsewhere have shot up.
The error in 'climate change', is to conclusively deduce that by association/cause and effect, CO2 is tied to warming. Yes CO2 is a greenhouse gas as are other molecules as well. But to prejudicely deduce a sole cause and effect tying the two together is unscientific. And here's why. A satellite can take a reading and input it into a computer model, and earth sensors can monitor CO2 tying the two together. But there is no macro geologic study of whats going on inside the earth itself. A satellite and a CO2 sensor tell us nothing about the internal structure of this monster we call earth. One example, the recent eruption in Hawaii. How much heat was released, just in this one event. And on the topic of glaciers, the Pine Island Glacier sits on top of an active ancient volcano! And yet we have accepted a condescending expectation of what the 'heat' amount should be, to a prejudicial correlation to something we have control over CO2. Its just so unscientific. Now heres the irony though! Yes I do believe man should pollute less. But he should so because its the right thing to do. But lets test the conviction of those subscribing to 'climate change', as outlined by the UN. Polluting countries are granted immunity and may so continue polluting and as such 'smart appliances', are still manufactured in polluting economies, and still shipped on monstrous vessels on the high seas back to us, the consumers. Another point. If climate change is so serious and of such importance that the very future of mankind is at stake, then why not protect and make public patents that release us from big oil? No, my logic dictates that its unscientific, without conviction, and promotes the status quo, at the expense of the 3rd world and at the behest that consumer nations fall for the claim that the toaster should be able to listen and talk to the washer and dryer! Really c'mon people!
@MrOTLChamp "you refuse to look at the fact that the earth was warming far before the industry period started" On the contrary I recognise that climate chnage can have many factors that influence it (since the 1970's humans have been the most likely explanation for the majority of warming) and that past changes show that the climate is sensitive. For warming you need a continued driver. What natural factor has driven the majority of warming since the 1970's?
How come we don't have records of the weather from 4.5 billion years ago? Surely, we can't just start taking studies in the last 200 year and assume because a occurring and reoccurring event is taking place we can label it a bad thing? Wake up and smell the money making hoax formulated from untrustworthy scientist!
"Hide the decline" is nothing more sinister than the fact that one (and only one) series of proxy tree ring recods showed a decline when the actual temperature readings showed an increase. So this set of readings was not used.
It was both tree ring and satellite data that showed decades of temperature declines. Excluding data, because it doesn't fit your narrative is called fraud.
0:40 why don’t you show a zoomed out version of this graph. When you zoom in like that you make it seem like climate change isn’t real because the temperature is dipping and falling but when you look over the last millennia their is a clear overall spike towards the end. Right when human emissions rose.
That’s only in America, their are millions of Indians without water because of climate change, here in Australia for 10 years our farmers have had to abandon their farms because of the climate changing, in Africa and China dessertification has forced millions from their villages and is rapidly excelling. Their is more to the world then just America.
Many of the problems we’re facing are solvable if for no other reason than we created them; in which case, solve the problem(s) before they eliminate their cause (us).
MOST of these "Modern Instruments" were located in HOT Areas like run-up pads at the airport, Net to A/C condensers and City Dumps close to incinerators
When you get a loan for your house you must tell the bank you can only accept a 10-12 year loan because the world will end then and you will be unable to pay after that.
Why are we even discussing whether climate change and global warming is real? Shouldn’t be it be straightforward? Just proves how ignorant and dull some people are.
Actually it proves how dishonest the media and the left is on the subject. What they do is conflate climate change with anthropogenic inputs that may be altering the course of naturally occurring climate change. Of course climate change is real and it's been happening for billions of years. The extent to which man is altering natural occurring climate change and the extent to which man can change the course of naturally occurring climate change is the real question. It's the ignorant and gullible dolts that conflate these two very different issues.
@MrOTLChamp No one can force a bank to lend any money they don't wish to. The door was opened and they took advantage of it simply because of greed. They all knew it was high risk business, yielding extremely high interest rates, but they also knew the tax payers would ultimately cover the losses. Ask the bankers.
It just struck me: this video is attached to an ad for Chevy cars... You want a conspiracy... look no further.. This is a serious conflict of interest for this highly slanted piece of corporate "journalism"
@checkyoursources Feel free to show me where the US government has ever come in at, or below budget? Our governments estimate for cost of medcaid went over by 9x's the original budget. Our postal system is over budget by 8 billion a year. Our school systems are far more expensive than the private Charter schools, not to mention they're better. There's not 1 entity that the government runs, that would be cheaper than the private sector. There's far too much waste when the government is involved.
I agree that climate change is irrelevant and we do need to change our dependence on oil. We need to focus on real pollutants such as sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, and other toxic pollutants. Taxing carbon dioxide is ridiculous and most definitely not going to improve the environment. The rich will get richer and the rest of us will go broke. And in the process the wealthy get us to give up more of our freedom with the new laws. Read the suggested Copenhagen treaty. Can you say liberty gone!
@checkyoursources These people weren't losing their homes because they didn't have a job. They lost their home when the loan matured and they had to pay the full mortgage. They never made enough money to qualify for these loans in the first place. In fact, Bush went to Congress 17 times during his 8yrs to try and get Fannie and Freddy to fix this problem. Cont....
@725672567256 If the main countries are going to be taxed for Co2, it will crush their economies, which in turn will affect all the little countries that are supported by them to suffer too. Not to mention, it doesn't even make sense that taxing countries like the United States, and giving the money to smaller countries so they may get out of the third world and start needing more fossil fuels and electricity.(which is created from fossil fuels). It's about taxes, not climate change.
@MrOTLChamp WMO 2011: Over the ten years from 2001 to 2010, global temperatures have averaged 0.46°C (0.83°F) above the 1961-1990 average, and are the highest ever recorded for a 10-year period since the beginning of instrumental climate records. 2) UAH -November 2011 +0.123C the anomaly is approximately +0.376C above the 1961-1990 time period used by the Met Office and WMO. UAH Dec 2011: +0.13 deg. C 3) median and mean are not the same. Next.
People forget that the planet has been heating up, cooling down and repairing itself way before humans came along.
If the ocean is going to rise, why did the Obama's spend 15 mil. on a mansion on the coast?
Jay S al gore did the same thing when he told everyone to sell their beach front homes
Science Talk TV and guess where they got all that money from? Climate change hahaha. You’re an idiot to believe we can control climate change. Climate will change and has always been changing before we even got on this planet. It will keep changing when we are gone too if that ever happens.
@@MasterEggroll i know its crazy the real issue is overpopulation
@@MasterEggroll no shit the climate changes, but not like this. We ARE changing the climate
@@olechristianhenne6583 and litter, light pollution, air pollution, ocean pollution etc
So you are saying that my organic cotton 50 dollar shirt wont save this planet?
Lol.....some people are so stupid to buy their sales pitch.
@@AZrakoon yeah especially dumbocrats and libtards.
@@orgr3189 w o w
You don't make that much.
Up line and sinker...Basically you leave out the bait your gonna get a bite....Guess what you did?
12 years later still waiting for the predictions to come true
try 60 years later
@@Quietman66j Sorry Charlie, but you cannot keep pushing the date for supposed climate catastrophes into the future and expect people to keep falling for the hysteria. The Piltdown Man fooled them for thirty years too.
try 69 years later
It's April 27th 2024 here in London, it's supposed be spring but it's freezing!🥶
The main issue is: If it is urgent to act, empower the people. Give us tax credits for planting trees. Don't tax us... You just want to grab more power.
Just imagine how many other things in life are hoaxes.
No
Mercenary Holocaust, Dino’s, basically every major war was fought for bankers to get rich, etc
Sam Roble and for resources, like Africa’s vast mineral and oil reserves
Jeffrey Rodriguez yes jews love that
Yes thank you mercenary
When has the climate on earth NOT been changing.
The taste at which we are changing the climate is the problem
@@duustincrawford2945 How are we changing the climate?
EXACTLY. My god. When people say that oh it’s the hottest month ever they are lying to themselves as there is no records showing the temperature of the millions of years prior to scientists beginning to record data. Also, 50 years ago there was such thing as CLIMATE COOLING?! This being further disproven when you realise Greenland never used to be covered in ice. Lol.
“Co2 is bad for the ozone layer and is making it bigger”. ha. So basically we should get rid of co2 and kill ourselves. Yes, this is what has happened to society. Recently studies conducted showed that the ozone layer while got smaller and was healing itself yet that’s also a bad thing? My god. Our friken scientists are deluded.
@@charlie8508 Its definitely not all scientists, but the ones that are polled are specificely picked because the polling is biased towards one opinion, that being that global warming/climate change exists, but there are a lot of scientists (who actually qualify as one) who deny climate change (action) like Piers Corbyn, notoriously known for being the brother of the socialist Labour party leader in the UK.
Ok boomer
First the world was going to freeze, next the world was going to heat up, now weather is going to change. Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me.
Toon She Weather already HAS changed. Burning Australia is so dry, the Amazon Rain Forest (Lungs of the Earth) too. Drowning Polar Bears. Ever worsening storms!
The satellite weather on TV news changed. Rain used to approach Seattle from Alaska by a slow-moving Counter-Clockwise rotation over the Pacific. Now it's Clockwise and quicker. That made a CHANGE, FOR SURE.
Last summer the Seattle blackberries never ripened. They did rot though. Fermented premature berries. Blame that on nature? Pretty damn irresponsible!
Roger F you do know that a lot of people got arrested for starting the fires in Australia right . This is all a game to them .
@@rogerf7229 200+ people arrested for starting fires
@@Blessed_Sound no no your a troll its impossible to not believe in global warming
PC__ ' how is it impossible to not believe in global warming if the same people who told me the world is going to warm up is the same ones who said the world is going to freeze . And the same ones who said the Australia fires was because of gloable warning when In reality , a lot of people got arrested for starting the fires them selves .
There is no way cbs would ever publish something like this today
It's no wonder it's still on CZcams fake puppets
I was thinking the same lol
The summers in the 80s were far longer and hotter than now in the UK!
I reckon last year was a normal summer in the 80s...Normally one good summer every five years.
Yet in the 80s we still moaned about the British weather.
@@justinsteel6360
It's fake
@@justinsteel6360 same in the late 1940s. I think last year we broke that record for the hottest summer. So clearly bullshit.
almost 10 years since this was uploaded and guess what? none of the predictions made in the past were right...
YOU ARE RIGHT HA HA HA !
Nothing will hit until 2050. Just you wait.
AnTi-Series ok pal when I’m watching Star Wars 20 with my kids I’ll be laughing at this
Auto Nova well, at least you’re willing to wait.
Give me one example of an environmentalist who has money and power because they made us fear something.
when the solution is my money, then I'm being conned.
So you don't go to the doctor?
The solution isn’t your money, the solution is the threat of your money taken so you would take the necessary actions to solve the problem. How else will you be motivated to save the environment?
AnTi-Series I oooooooh I understand now ....... it’s blackmail
blakestilltippin yes. Yes it is. The law is also blackmail, and you know the punishment for every individual crime so it serves as a threat that scares you into not committing crimes.
duustin crawford
Does the doctor tax us for things not our fault?...
Like carbon tax... even tho corporations produce most carbon...
Yet it’s BS since the earth still needs carbon it’s a building block of life...
The earth has been changing for thousands of years. It hasn't all of a sudden happen right now!
It’s actually done the same thing that’s how we know the history of the earth
Do you not know what air pollution is?
Bill Gates predicted that we needed to be ready for coronavirus.
Nobody listened.
Now he is saying that we have to address climate change, will anyone listen?
czcams.com/video/7A4npk1Deug/video.html
Cameron Greaves well yeah but it doesn’t change this fast, within 30 years half of all coral reefs have died, rainforests are getting destroyed, there is too much CO2 and it’s causing animals to die
Collin McDowell Bull shit, those are just red herrings done by climate change bozos, initiatives to deceive the masses at large.
Environmentalism is about making money
@None your Beeswax what my name is Wow U luv your ignorance dont ya? Climate effects the whole planet! How the hell is temp rise a scam? Think next time...
@None your Beeswax what my name is Maybe this is too complicated for U.. But I'll try and make this simple... No matter how much money or tax is taken nothing except real climate chg will actually chg the planet's temp. Since this is ALREADY happened it is not a hoax, or scam, or whatever excuse U try to come up with. Because if wasnt real we wouldnt have man made GW. But since this is real and we R getting warmer we need drastic chgs NOW! EVERYONE has to sacrifice if we want to prevent suffering and that means financial sacrifices too... So ya its going to mean money has to be spent,,, the sucking off the planet resources for free is over, and we need to spare no one's wallet to save the planet
@None your Beeswax what my name is Yes I see this pattern a lot... Its sad that your reading comprehension skills need work. I can see how our education sys has failed us. Your faked English skills attack ,and U just dont understand my superior intellect compared to 97% of the world's Scientist phony argument is typ denier tactic.... Its weak it definitely lacks any intellectual come back but Ive learned to expect that. After all, U cant argue with Sci, as U either have no understanding of it or U R in denial of it. 2nd I used your own statements and U failed to back it up with anything! "oh U R just too complex for us to understand your deep understanding of the deep state or secret tax ripoff which U and dwindling few believers understand! Give me a break... I gave U a FACTUAL statement which U could not refute so U deflected because U CANT WIN.... So sad so weak, yet so obvious that U got nothing to go on...
1 GW is man made and REAL
2 Its not some tax scam its SCI and its going to cost those who took
advantage of the planet for generations
3 U lost here thats easy to see
None your Beeswax what my name is he's trying to say its not about making money you daft choff
@None your Beeswax what my name is What part of Global Warming is science dont U get? Academic researchers dont get paid more or less because they say something against your opinion! This conspiracy crap is the real conspiracy in itself! Scientist tell the truth from the natural laws of the universe... These right wing conspiracy talking points are created by ad and marketing consultants just to motivate the science illiterate... Science is not politics its FACT! All these conspiracy GW deniers claim its a money scam R pawns for big oil and other interest... The SCIENCE IS REAL and undeniable BECAUSE it uses proven SCIENCE... GW is real and its largely man made it will get much worse if we dont make drastic chgs NOW!
Con artists , money talks and BS walks.
Wait..!! I thought global warming was debunked long ago when Al Gore's predictions ended up not only false, but unchanged..
Truth that
JohnFruscianteMarkLa mate the fuckin politicians in Australia are putting 2 billion dollars towards this so called climate change. That’s my fucking money going towards retards that believe this shit. I’m 100% with you
JohnFruscianteMarkLa Global warming is real
@@MrWizardofozzz - Most of his predictions did come true. Gore was a chump by hiding the time lines as he was doing the political thing rather then being fully transparent.
Government : Climate Change is real, we need to stop it !
People : How do we do that??
Government: Taxes !!!
People : ....
If anything you would expect the government to deny climate change so the oil companies can benefit and continue pumping money into their economies.
The taxes are a deterrent to stop people releasing unnecessary amounts of carbon. And yeah they generally work unless you have any better ideas
Of course it's a hoax. Open your eyes and see...
Meng Anak I’m trying I just can’t find any solid information proving its legitimacy or it’s falsity
Meng Anak I genuinely hate smug people like you going around saying wAKe uP or oPEn yoUr EYes without giving evidence. “You’re brainwashed” is not good enough to carry your argument.
AnTi-Series I soy boy.
Josh Gen nope, neither will insults.
Your the type of hypocrite no one can even argue against because you can't accept anything you don't agree with.
Going green, is where your money leaves your pocket for someone else's.
Willy Bee huh?? It saves you a TON of money to go green? Please link a source which is telling you that it’s the other way around
Why mention Obama when debating climate change? He is not a scientist. There are special interest involved to make money and fame.
Jaspal S because at the time, Obama was president of one of the leading carbon emitting country in the world. Governments need to make plans to reduce carbon emissions and the head of state is important for that.
@@victorochoa4205 - By the way - what is your area of expertise ? Have you studied GEOLOGY?
@@victorochoa4205 Obama was one of the biggest supporters of addressing climate chg,,, U may hating him but U R just making crap up to fit your beliefs
Because this bit was published in 2009
@@victorochoa4205 blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2014/07/11/what-geology-has-to-say-about-global-warming/
If bill nye says its real i will most likely say its fake on any subject
And when you confront one of the climate activists they freak the fuck out... it’s funny lol
We cant control the climate my dudes were along for the ride. Its changed before and it will change again.
18,000 years ago, where i'm sitting now was under an ice sheet more than a kilometer thick. it had all gone before humans could possibly have influenced that melt. climate is subject to perpetual change NATURALLY!
Sure, there’s natural climate change, but what’s happening now is way too quick to be natural. I’m sorry, but if that’s your logic, I’d better say that your parents didn’t have a choice to have you, because humans have had the natural instinct to reproduce for thousands of years. That’s simply not true. A long time ago isn’t now. Climate change may have happened naturally then, but not now, just as reproduction happened instinctively, but now people choose to have children, or not to have children.
@@brianfeuerman1732
"what’s happening now is way too quick to be natural."
Sure?
Can prove?
Lol!
Vladimir Gurevich yeah we can prove. Should the earth rise 3 degrees within 30 years? no! That is not just natural. Now if you don’t do some research, you can go and make your flat earth even worse, idiot
So I guess when we reach “zero carbon emissions” and plants and trees don’t have what they need to survive and thrive and, oh I don’t know - STAY GREEN!!! , the “Green Movement” will be rebranded as the “Brown Movement”
Wait... u think plants will suffocate because humans aren’t pumping carbon dioxide into the atmosphere? Seariously??
@@borisbobbington3234 yes , trees need carbon to make oxygen!! So if there's no carbon the less trees are.
@@dove6069 so how did they breathe before humans were around? Zero carbon emissions only mean zero carbon emissions from humans.
@@borisbobbington3234 whos they? Lol!!
My point is , we need carbon dioxide , just like shadows need light.
The scientist dont want to lose that federal funding!
They tryna make us pay more tax/ carbon tax.
What about the shift in the poles? Do you think a 160 miles shift might cause some climate change?
hundreds of variables to predict climate change. climatologists use about 3, not enough to make an honest prediction.all they have to do to keep the grants coming.
Interesting.. which study shows that? I'd love to read it. Man it's refreshing that you found some proof. With it you can blow the lid off this conspiracy. Share it brother and you'll be famous.
@@louiscypher1001 Well Vincent does deal in Sci proof. He has pol opinions instead
@@louiscypher1001 changing it from "global warming" to "climate change" is enough to see its political BS and actually looking at how the planets climate changes all the damn time makes me even more skeptical. In the 50's it was a big freeze and then it changes as soon as all that OPEC bullshit happens. The plants are loving it though they suck up majority of the CO2 in the spring time according to NASA. So idk man but politicians like to keep issues going so they have talking points.
@J_C tell that to the NASA models fam.
@@louiscypher1001
Earth has seen CO2 levels hundred times higher than today. It never melted away but has been covered with ice many times. We are living in a short break between the ice ages. Blowing the lid off this conspiracy does not require one being Einstein. Just not being a square idiot like you.
Ten years later and no new cuts to emissions on China or India's part... But remember they think it is real.
What part?
Obviously the part where humans have little impact going by how many more coal plants they're building.
czcams.com/video/pPRd5GT0v0I/video.html
CBC called the man a sceptic not a denier, amma hit the like just for that.
Don't let this distract you from the fact that Lightningmcqueen lost the second lap helping someone
if global warming was fake, why did club penguin shut down and turn into a beach???!
RoBuddy can’t argue with that
And now look at the big oil influence on these studies in the begining, and after they found it detrimental to their bottom line.. $$$$
Fake news...
@Delike el Ducce
"Can't be fake if it is real"
Absolutely!
But also other way around is true:
"Can't be real if it is fake"
All we have to do is to check the facts:
www.heartland.org/_template-assets/documents/CCR/CCR-II/CCR-II-Full.pdf
Suck up and shut up!
Lol
Climate change used to be called seasons. But someone decided it's a cash cow waiting to be milked.
The earth changes on its own every minute...they will never bullshit their way through it.
Human can never alter earthly figures it moves it own.
Check "DOD can control the weather"
J.Calveley
"Climate Change a Hoax?"
What a silly way to frame the question
They're obviously just answered their question by saying the question!
czcams.com/video/fZTTI_0mHN0/video.html
If you ignore the environment, don't complain when the environment ignores you.
What if we're all wrong and make the world a better place for no reason?
All of Kevin Trenberth' predictions have been wrong for the last 30 years.
Which predictions in which research report?
@@louiscypher1001
Probably ALL predictions in ALL reports?
Did you try to google?
Please do and let me know if you discover something interesting...
@@vladimirgurevich8415 - Hi Vlad, Look up the scientific method. You may wish to check how consensus among professionals work. have a good one.
@@vladimirgurevich8415 - Which reports? thanks
@@louiscypher1001
Ha-ha-ha
A louisy ignoramus tries to teach scientists.
LOL :-)
There is no consensus among climatologists. Not all of them are prostitutes. Actually if you take your time and carefully read scientific papers beyond abstract, you'll see that most of them understand that AGW is a hoax. In many cases fine print in the articles states things exactly opposite to what's said in the abstract.
All scientists are people and need money to live. For physicists it's easier because they do not have to compromise their integrity. Climatologists have to make hard choice - live like a lying weasel or face "The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune"
Once again:
IS IT SO HARD TO POST ONE!
ONE!
ONE LINK TO AN ARTICLE THAT YOU TRUST?
That makes an attempt to prove AGW.
What does it take to make you do it?
Kiss your tuches or kick you butt?
LOL!
The bible claims it's caused by the sun Rev . 16th chapt.I think,
The bible’s timeline doesn’t reach into the present day, things may have changed along the way.
BasedChristPill explain.
paying more taxes won't change the weather
10,000 years ago North America was covered with a sheet of ice.
It melted! Are you going to blame that on campfires?
No we aren’t, because campfires don’t release as much gas and smoke as coal facility’s and chemical facility’s.
@checkyoursources Where exactly would you like to start you temps from?
You say from the 70's. It was actually coolest in 85. So from 75 to 85 the temps went down. The last decade doesn't show any warming. In fact, it clearly shows no warming at all. And by the time we got to Dec 2011 we were only .2 deg. warmer than the median temps in the mid 70's. -UAH Dec 2011
Waddles Pines evidence?
@@zigzagzog66 Read the pages on global warming itself as well
Why not read the global temperature averages? They do compile that and it's available on line.
@@louiscypher1001
You know, lousy, you can read anything, but after climategate one has to be careful. I've mentioned already that during just 3 years in the beginning of 90s Canada has shut down almost half of it' weather stations. And what a coincidence! Exactly during the same 3 years average temperature readings in Canada skyrocketed 1.5 degrees C!
This corresponds to 0.5 degrees C of high latitude northern hemisphere.
Afraid, if they reopen all the stations AGW will go up in flames (or maybe down into freeze?)
@@vladimirgurevich8415 - Steven Harper the leader of Canada suppressed its scientists and environmental research during that era as his party was heavily financed by the energy sector. www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/canadian-scientists-open-about-how-their-government-silenced-science-180961942/ -
Links? What emails? Where are your references?
Hmmm. Wonder what else they are hiding or lying about?
Do you think the deceit stops here?
Where is the hole in the ozone gone???? A bit tax is all it is
45 minutes before 2020..climate change.(.they told us all this back in 2011.point of no return)..All the best for 2020.🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🥂👌👍
Welcome to 2020 where there is a virus. Wildfires and the arctic temperatures hitting 100.4 f
Alright here,s the truth yes we have climate change every year for my entire life I have been surviveing climate change and so have everyone it's called seasons.
Cool story bro
As the spy from tf2 says.” You imbecile! You’ve doomed us all!”
Every cooling cycle of an extended period is inevitably followed by a warning cycle. In the past, these were always known by their less scientific names as: winter and summer. I guess it takes climatologists to make that determination now days. Whoda thunk? $$$$$$$$ KA CHING!
Floyd Cooper czcams.com/video/UxhUxbaLBrM/video.html
It’s called denial and your government and company’s are in on it. But ok
Your mixing up weather (what I see out the window) with Climate change (the chances of what your seeing out the window of happening). Glad I could help..
i'll be naughty here and say that really it's just a freak of nature and geology that all that nasty carbon is now locked up underground. all we're doing is putting it back where it was originally!
@MrOTLChamp "was just 40 yrs ago that the scientist said we were going into an iceage" 1) 1970s ice age predictions were predominantly media based. The majority of peer reviewed research at the time predicted warming due to increasing CO2.
A survey of peer reviewed scientific papers from 1965 to 1979 show that few papers predicted global cooling (7 in total). Significantly more papers (42 in total) predicted global warming (Peterson 2008).
Go to 1922 hottest year on record then artic melting oh no that didn't happen did it .give us a break do your research
* July 2020 was the second-hottest month ever recorded on Earth.
* June 2020 was the second-hottest June of all time.
* May 2020 was the hottest May of all time.
* April 2020 was the second-hottest April of all time.
* March 2020 was the second-hottest March of all time.
* February 2020 was the second-hottest February of all time.
* January 2020 was the hottest January of all time.
Thank you for that
@MrOTLChamp Are you not shocked that the US healthcare system gives people a life expectancy only just equal to Chile's national helath service?
In every country with both systems the cost per person is cheaper if the healthcare comes from tax money than if people choose private. The lack of regulation by govt led to the financial meltdown.
The flat earthers say that as the oceans start to rise that the excess water will just flow over the edge. Problem solved!
Late 70's it was acid rain then in the 80's it was ozone depletion now it is global warming or man made climate change. They have to keep changing the name. I know that there is air and water pollution which needs to be addressed.
lol the cycle of lies continue
Brent Givens nobody "CHANGED" any names dumbass those are all different completely separate issues smart guy
@@adamlynch6954
"those are all different completely separate issues"
Separate issues but same commie agenda, smartass.
All three part of one big lie.
@@vladimirgurevich8415 one big lie said no one intelligent ever
Hang on... Global warming? what about the pause?
@checkyoursources " The lack of regulation by govt led to the financial meltdown."
On the contrary. It was the governments involvement with the loan process (namely, lowering the standards needed to qualify for the home loans) that caused the meltdown. Banks were forced to give loans to people that couldn't afford them. In fact, Obama was representing ACORN in a lawsuit against CITIBank, for not lending to these people that didn't qualify. They used race as the leverage to get a settlement.
in my region, temperatures are most of the times under season normal values. it.s definitely getting colder here
Wow you’re a genius
Makes sense, climate change isn’t just “earths getting warmer” some areas will get affected differently.
Look weather! Time for a tax:)
None your Beeswax what my name is
Co2 is an insulating gas. Which means it traps heat.
More Co2=more trapped heat.
Humans= produce Co2
Simple as that. Ignore the graphs, fake or not. Use your fucking common sense.
@VeryEvilPettingZoo
Look at weather record. When it's long enough - it's climate.
And 150 years long record tells me that you are either a bullshitter on salary or an idiot.
Yeah global warming isn't real. All those records of having winters where my area got over 3' of snow every winter are the ones that are faulse. These mild winters where we're lucky to get 1 snow storm that has over a foot of snow is how its always been. God I can't beleive I let the media make me beleive that the seasons are warmer then they were 20 years ago.
Crescent Star extreme weather does not prove climate change.. even the scientists that support the theory of clate change state that fact.
Don't believe everything you seen or heard on the internet numb skull
Ok. I see you have an inability to look outside the US. Cities really are going underwater in a matter of years. Take the Maldives for example. They are predicted to completely sink in a few years. The Thai city of Bangkok is not going to survive much longer. You see, Greenland may even be green in the future. Looking at the US, if we don’t stop the ice caps from melting quickly, Florida may be an island and New Orleans may be gone.
I'm straight, but if you seriously believe this nonsense then there’s no hope for you.
@@certifiedbruh2180lmao …. another , "not in your neck of the woods clown"
@MrOTLChamp "so that their readings would measure higher than normal" - wrong again: Independent studies using different software, different methods, and different data sets yield very similar results. The increase in temperatures since 1975 is a consistent feature of all reconstructions. This increase cannot be explained as an artifact of the adjustment process, the decrease in station numbers, or other non-climatological factors.
it is unreal to me. the evidence is right here in our faces and this man is actually trying to tell us were reading it wrong?? how is this taken out of context?? these statements dont leave any room for interpretation. so how are WE getting it wrong
So it's exaggerated. Who cares. It's a real thing wether it is insane or not. If we keep this up, Arctic animals might become tropical animals
@Mike Wible and what happens if it is real? They'll be no time left to do anything
Mike Wible It’s real. Look outside of the USA. We have rising sea levels due to the ice caps melting at higher levels than that of 1950. Countries are going to go underwater. Ok, I see that you can’t look at South Asia. That’s fine. At least take note that Louisiana’s going underwater. In fact, the USA and Canada are the world’s coldest countries. Temperatures elsewhere have shot up.
The polar bear population is increasing
The error in 'climate change', is to conclusively deduce that by association/cause and effect, CO2 is tied to warming. Yes CO2 is a greenhouse gas as are other molecules as well. But to prejudicely deduce a sole cause and effect tying the two together is unscientific. And here's why. A satellite can take a reading and input it into a computer model, and earth sensors can monitor CO2 tying the two together. But there is no macro geologic study of whats going on inside the earth itself. A satellite and a CO2 sensor tell us nothing about the internal structure of this monster we call earth. One example, the recent eruption in Hawaii. How much heat was released, just in this one event. And on the topic of glaciers, the Pine Island Glacier sits on top of an active ancient volcano! And yet we have accepted a condescending expectation of what the 'heat' amount should be, to a prejudicial correlation to something we have control over CO2. Its just so unscientific. Now heres the irony though! Yes I do believe man should pollute less. But he should so because its the right thing to do.
But lets test the conviction of those subscribing to 'climate change', as outlined by the UN. Polluting countries are granted immunity and may so continue polluting and as such 'smart appliances', are still manufactured in polluting economies, and still shipped on monstrous vessels on the high seas back to us, the consumers.
Another point. If climate change is so serious and of such importance that the very future of mankind is at stake, then why not protect and make public patents that release us from big oil? No, my logic dictates that its unscientific, without conviction, and promotes the status quo, at the expense of the 3rd world and at the behest that consumer nations fall for the claim that the toaster should be able to listen and talk to the washer and dryer!
Really c'mon people!
That isn't going to happen.
Trillions of our taxpayers dollars spent will be worth it if it saves just 1 polar bear. Maybe not.
FYI
Polar bears became a real problem in Alaska.
Hunting them down is being seriously considered.
@MrOTLChamp "you refuse to look at the fact that the earth was warming far before the industry period started" On the contrary I recognise that climate chnage can have many factors that influence it (since the 1970's humans have been the most likely explanation for the majority of warming) and that past changes show that the climate is sensitive. For warming you need a continued driver. What natural factor has driven the majority of warming since the 1970's?
The sun?
Nothing like using pseudoscience to disprove actual science.
"If climate change is not real, then why did club penguin shut down? Why did it not snow at MY house last year?"
How come we don't have records of the weather from 4.5 billion years ago? Surely, we can't just start taking studies in the last 200 year and assume because a occurring and reoccurring event is taking place we can label it a bad thing? Wake up and smell the money making hoax formulated from untrustworthy scientist!
Hey, Kevin, did you ever find your missing heat? LOL
2020 Democrats forgot about this.
The biggest tax on everyone the world has ever seen
Caught lying. End of story
"Hide the decline" is nothing more sinister than the fact that one (and only one) series of proxy tree ring recods showed a decline when the actual temperature readings showed an increase. So this set of readings was not used.
It was both tree ring and satellite data that showed decades of temperature declines. Excluding data, because it doesn't fit your narrative is called fraud.
other countries need to do something, not the USA they already pass
Why did they use the Skyrim HUD
think how much paper and stationary the internet has saved
0:40 why don’t you show a zoomed out version of this graph. When you zoom in like that you make it seem like climate change isn’t real because the temperature is dipping and falling but when you look over the last millennia their is a clear overall spike towards the end. Right when human emissions rose.
Anna T29 czcams.com/video/pPRd5GT0v0I/video.html
what a bad piece of reporting.
That’s only in America, their are millions of Indians without water because of climate change, here in Australia for 10 years our farmers have had to abandon their farms because of the climate changing, in Africa and China dessertification has forced millions from their villages and is rapidly excelling. Their is more to the world then just America.
Many of the problems we’re facing are solvable if for no other reason than we created them; in which case, solve the problem(s) before they eliminate their cause (us).
MOST of these "Modern Instruments" were located in HOT Areas like run-up pads at the airport, Net to A/C condensers and City Dumps close to incinerators
My guy… these instruments were measuring tree rings… not air temperature next to a hot vent… lmao
When you get a loan for your house you must tell the bank you can only accept a 10-12 year loan because the world will end then and you will be unable to pay after that.
@thermalf Just keep replanting trees and you will have an endless amount of carbon fuel to burn.
I guess nobody likes the vroom vroom of engines... So sad
Why are we even discussing whether climate change and global warming is real? Shouldn’t be it be straightforward? Just proves how ignorant and dull some people are.
Actually it proves how dishonest the media and the left is on the subject. What they do is conflate climate change with anthropogenic inputs that may be altering the course of naturally occurring climate change. Of course climate change is real and it's been happening for billions of years. The extent to which man is altering natural occurring climate change and the extent to which man can change the course of naturally occurring climate change is the real question. It's the ignorant and gullible dolts that conflate these two very different issues.
We'll all fly around the world to summits to solve climate change.
That's because meltwater is lubricating the contact point between ice and rock.
@MrOTLChamp No one can force a bank to lend any money they don't wish to. The door was opened and they took advantage of it simply because of greed. They all knew it was high risk business, yielding extremely high interest rates, but they also knew the tax payers would ultimately cover the losses. Ask the bankers.
It just struck me: this video is attached to an ad for Chevy cars... You want a conspiracy... look no further.. This is a serious conflict of interest for this highly slanted piece of corporate "journalism"
@checkyoursources Feel free to show me where the US government has ever come in at, or below budget?
Our governments estimate for cost of medcaid went over by 9x's the original budget.
Our postal system is over budget by 8 billion a year.
Our school systems are far more expensive than the private Charter schools, not to mention they're better.
There's not 1 entity that the government runs, that would be cheaper than the private sector.
There's far too much waste when the government is involved.
@mrbrianmccarthy I'm kind of getting sick of coming here to reply to posts. Forget I said anything about stupid Global Warming.
I agree that climate change is irrelevant and we do need to change our dependence on oil. We need to focus on real pollutants such as sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, and other toxic pollutants. Taxing carbon dioxide is ridiculous and most definitely not going to improve the environment. The rich will get richer and the rest of us will go broke. And in the process the wealthy get us to give up more of our freedom with the new laws. Read the suggested Copenhagen treaty. Can you say liberty gone!
@checkyoursources These people weren't losing their homes because they didn't have a job. They lost their home when the loan matured and they had to pay the full mortgage. They never made enough money to qualify for these loans in the first place. In fact, Bush went to Congress 17 times during his 8yrs to try and get Fannie and Freddy to fix this problem. Cont....
funny how they didn't say global warming in the video
@725672567256 If the main countries are going to be taxed for Co2, it will crush their economies, which in turn will affect all the little countries that are supported by them to suffer too. Not to mention, it doesn't even make sense that taxing countries like the United States, and giving the money to smaller countries so they may get out of the third world and start needing more fossil fuels and electricity.(which is created from fossil fuels). It's about taxes, not climate change.
Fancy words to say thy lied.
I once saw something about how a long long time ago (thousands of years) the tempature got hot then went back down
The world was hotter 50 years ago
@MrOTLChamp WMO 2011: Over the ten years from 2001 to 2010, global temperatures have averaged 0.46°C (0.83°F) above the 1961-1990 average, and are the highest ever recorded for a 10-year period since the beginning of instrumental climate records. 2) UAH -November 2011 +0.123C the anomaly is approximately +0.376C above the 1961-1990 time period used by the Met Office and WMO. UAH Dec 2011: +0.13 deg. C 3) median and mean are not the same. Next.