Which is better f 35 or Gripen? comparison of US built F35 and SAAB 39E Gripen by Sweden
Vložit
- čas přidán 25. 07. 2024
- Fighter jets play a crucial role in any conflict by tackling the enemy in the air and preventing them from entering their airspace. When it comes to power aircraft, it isn't just about how quickly they fly. The aircraft should be able to turn around and attack the adversaries in fractions of seconds, not simply in terms of speed.
Most countries are building fighter jets, but only a handful have built fighters with a high level of attacking capability and the ability to operate at any level of rapid response.
In this video, we will analyze two fighter jets: the Lockheed Martin F35 Lightning 2 from the United States and the Saab Jas 39 E fighter jets from Sweden.
Which is better f 35 or Gripen? comparison of US built F35 and SAAB 39E Gripen by Sweden
jetlinemarvel.net/f35-vs-gripen/
#F35 #JAS39E #SAAB #fighterjet #Aerospace - Jak na to + styl
Everything is wrong here... Gripen E has the 414 engine which generates 98kN with AB.
Optional GE engine.
The video use the gripen C/D for comparacion, is not gripen E. It is a big wrong!
F-35? why images of F 22. You don´t even konw? come on!!!
Wrong f-35 top speed is 1900 km or 1.6 mach and the JAS top speed is 2 mach or 2600 km/h so you mixed tjena up.
Mach 2+ and with super cruse.
The f35 in beast mode can do mach 2 but not in super Cruise mode
The F-35 can not hold that speed for more than a few seconds unless that problem has been fixed
@@Robert-fs1pb Source please
@@Robert-fs1pb The F-35 can only stay in Mach 1.6 for a few second or it breaks show where they fixed the problem
The Jas 39 E uses GaN tech in its E warfaire suite making it very hard to see.
2:09 the first 39E model was realesed in like 2021 idk but the first version was made 1997
Almost , first made was in 2019 , first mass production 2021 to both Sweden and Brazil. Still better then this video (E not A model).
1996 the gripen c was made. gripen E flew the first time in 2017
Jas 39 E has the most modern aviation system in the world.
No, that would be F35
@@daginn896 No it is not, the base of that aviation system is more than 17 yars old. It controlls close to everything in F35. This it does not allow you to add weapons without a long process. Jas uses a dubble system where aviation is separated from weapons making it possible to add new weapons at a mater of hours instead of months on an F35. But do not worry there will be a divided system in F35 block 4 and it is now under development.
This video is crowded with errors. Gripen E and Gripen C is mixed multiple times and the top speeds between Gripen and F35 is swapped 😱… The release date of Gripen E is mixed whith the one for Gripen A, ….
This video is just another bias f35 video, but then they have to make the f35 sound better than any other fighter since it's cost almost 2 trillion dollars, and it's still almost 20 years behind development, so they have to hype it and Strech its performance to make sales and recoup all that money.
I keep reading things like the F-35 having better tech (it doesn't) and the Gripen is best suited for countries with a limited budget (which is EVERY country except the USA). You want to know if the Gripen is better than the F-35, here's the answer that NOBODY can argue with:
If you take cost-per-flight hour into account, the F-35 is between 5 and 6 times the total cost of the Gripen. You've seen that the general consensus is that the two planes are close in combat capability but they're not. The Gripen is faster, more maneuverable and can use a much larger array of weapons than the F-35. It can also fly close to electrical storms without fear of explosion. Ignore all that though, it is clear that the F-35 is NOT significantly more potent as a fighter than the Gripen.
What is the purpose of a fighter jet? The purpose of a fighter jet is to make your air force as powerful as it can be. Do you think for one minute that 10 F-35s would have a snowball's chance in hell against 55 Gripens when it's been pretty much established that the F-35 is NOT significantly more potent as a fighter than the Gripen? The answer is no.
Therefore, the Gripen makes your air force more powerful than the F-35.
Therefore the Gripen is better at delivering to an air force what a fighter is supposed to deliver.
Therefore, the Gripen is better than the F-35, end of line.
The rest is illogical semantics by people who WANT the F-35 to be worth it.
Uh. I think you’re forgetting literally the most important parts.
The Radar system that comes with the F-35. You have no idea of its wartime capabilities. Thats lock and key lmao.
The weapon systems that have been produced for this platform. Infinitely better.
Service ceiling of the F-35 is significantly higher.
Thet says a Swedish 😂😂 the f-35 is way better
@@matbkarlsenyt2827 no its not sorry:))))
Aren't we at 1000+ F-35 units produced? How many Gripens are there in the world? Even Norway has chosen the F-35.
F-35 also has better stealth, which helps a lot in delivering air-ground missiles against enemy AA installations. Gripen obviously doesn't have internal weapon storage like F-35. Gripen is a 4th-gen fighter, not a 5th-gen
Without stealth, who cares about the rest your already dead
final answer swedish saab gripen JAS 39E
Why did you use body parts to measure lengths
Yung price kasi ngayon ng F-35 is around $80,000,000 at ang Gripen E/F is around $65,000,000. So, hindi ko alam kung saan mo nakuha na mas mura ang F-35 kaysa sa Gripen E/F. Pero kung magkakatotoo ang pag-baba ng presyo ng F-35 kaysa sa Gripen E/F, palagay ko, kukuha ang pinas ng F-35.
Jas 39 E has a maximum altitude of 52 500 feet. Jas C has 50 000 feet.
Hej! Har förstått att du har kunskap på Gripen E:s styrkor. Vad har de för styrkor gentemot F-35':an? Hur pass bra är är EW-suit osv? Är en diskussion med några och de hävdar att Gripen E är sämre på allt.
When did the F-35 become the F-22?
It didn't, and it can't, but a lot of people think it has.
We will see at red flag.
@@user-ls5zb2dx5jBut he showed pictures of the f-22
F-35 don't emphasise fast speed. Because it has an electronic war system as disturbs radar and jams radar.
The importance is F-35 that does not rely on AWAC the same with JAS-39. Because AN/APG-81 AESA is better PS-05/A Raven AESA radar
You are Wrangel the first gripen war made 1997 but the new gripen E and F just came out on the market
Nope, by 1996 orders for upgrades to the C/D version were underway. The Gripen made its first flight in 1988 and the first batch of Gripen A/B was made in 1992.
Acutully i think they they would name the E version something new like JAS40 because it is a new aircraft
Can't you guys ever get your your lies straight, the Gripen E has a GE 4140 with 28000 lbs of thrust, not the Volvo motor with 22000 lbs of thrust. Official top speed for the Gripen E is Mach 2 and the F-35 is Mach 1.6. Let's quit improvising on the spec's. You don't have the right to make up spec's.
Have they fixed the Mach 1.3 limit so not to Break
The F35 is limited to 50 seconds at that speed. Its a shitbucker.
@@eleventy-seven Yup it sure is, it's useless for our application because it's too slow the intercept Russian Bomber and fighters on our northern border. Won't be long before the stealth doesn't work either.
The Jas 39 E costs 68 million
Jas 39 C has a fary range of over 4000 km.
You have got the speeds of these planes reversed!
And Gripen can super cruse.
And has a top speed of mach 2+
It doesn't matter of jets it matters of Pilots.
Thats just not true💀
Not necessarily, especially if the generation gap is more than considerable.
Cessna 206 are best
WTF is a "gruypen"?
This is not serious! So much of pure desinformation. Both the jets earn a significant presentation.
and a _jas cost 1/5 the cost airtime then the f35.. and still kicks ass .. haha
Mas magaling ng F-35 jet dahil vertical landing pwede sa saab-jas 39 jet hindi vertical landing..
Wrong info 🤔🤔🤔🤔
Film give wrong information about both plane speed Gripen top speed 1931km/h but correct speed is mach 2 2100 km/h for Gripen and not for F35 he have top speed 1931km/h so Gripen is faster.
No, those spec numbers are out of context.
For starters, the Gripen E can achieve M2.0 only in clean configuration, i.e. without missiles, fuel tanks or electronic warfare or observation pods. You can see this pattern repeating itself also in other fighters like the F-15, F-16, F/A-18, Rafale, Mirage 2000, Su-30 or Su-35 and among others, but when you set them up for a mission with a payload (even relatively light), their speed is degraded due to air resistance (aerodynamic drag of the payload). The F-35, as well as other stealth fighters do not have this problem (except if you arm them externally), because they have an internal payload bay, which makes them in many cases faster or at the same speed as 4th/4.5 generation fighters.
Jas 39 E is faster than Mac 2.
Did you just say that most countries are building fighter jets?
Yes he did!🤪😵💫
Si vede la turbina stessa e più bilanciata al peso!
Saab Gripen in un fight vince a distanza in tutti si aria aria sia aria terra!
Both
Sales video from us as normal. Europe pays the cost as normal.
Oh fer cripes sake. Showing the F22 and calling it the F35.
Jas 39 E is a new fighter the first serial production started 2 years ago.
Pakistan is gonna cry 1 day for not buying SAAB Gripen E/F instead of J-10C
They are too poor to afford it 😘
@@karanvarma5789 isliye Katora liye ghumta tha Imrand Khan 😆
@@Minato.Namikaze559 j-10 bhi to bheek pe mila hain tumhe lagta inn gareeb madrassachapo ke paas paise hain kuchh khareeedne ke. GB road ke randiyo ke barabar to inki aukaad hai. Bhikmanga desh 😂
it is not "graaaaaaipn" but "gripn"
The monkey asks the man. Which tastes better apple or banana?
Swedan?
MF computer sound....
Are we nuts??????
Sweden is Sweden not swedan
Total Bullshit:
The pictures shown are off the F22 Raptor, with twin engine nad thrust vectoring. It is not the F35
Learn the facts and do the right next time! everything is totally wrong about your Info!
Ha ha ha ha😂😂😂😂😂😂
Absolutete garbage. Some AI made this video from random google searches because there are far too many errors that a real fighter enthusiast wouldn't ever make.
This was so one sided comparison. No jet can compete with F 22 and F 35 except for Sukhoi Su 57.
Lets See Gripen has Electronic stealth Its wings dont fall off over Mach 1.3 It can Super cruise it can take off and land on short runways Its Cheaper than the F-35 even if
you give the F-35 away for free over its lifetime it has not got half its fleet grounded for maintenance most F-35 will not get the Necessary upgrades and this is from DOD its not getting
another Jet built because it cant perform necessary tasks
@@Karl-Benny hey bro,
Firstly, F-35 is a 5th gen heavy weight fighter jet and Gripen E/F is a 4.5 gen medium weight fighter jet with remarkable electronic capabilities.
So they both have their advantages and disadvantages.
SAAB Gripen E/F is a great jet and only a fool will underestimate it. Infact if Gripen E/F gets a more powerful engine, no fighter jet in this world will be a match for SAAB Gripen in category of single engine medium weight electronic jet. SAAB is a legend when it comes to technology.
But you have to agree that F-35 is a better jet bcoz of obvious role and gen difference. Gripen E/F is a match for USA's F-16s.
There's no such thing as Electronic Stealth Cloaking - Arexis EW only generates an ElectroMagnetic = EM field around GripenE to disrupt EM Seekers of Already Launched Missiles - with Radar that detects EM energy also able to detect the Arexis EM field so only buys time for the GripenE to escape the threat kill zone before missile launch + hopefully evade an already launched missile - not key survival factors of Very Low Observable Geometric Stealth that increases platform survivability by Disrupting Missile Launch ...
4G GripenE is an upgraded 4G GripenC - same as 4G F21 + F15EX + RafaleF3R + Su35 - that's it...
Sukhoi Su 57 isnt a huge threat, I think... Still uses past engine that isnt suited for stealth and that alone can indicate that the other claims about it is similar, aka less stealthy, lacking computers compared to the West, worse EMC capabilities etc. The West hardly talk about the Su57 and trust me. That is not because of fear. If the Russians have system that was seen as a threat they would talk none stop about it because that is how you boost military spending in a democracy... In short, Su57 is probably not as good as the Russians proclaim tbh.
Who will buy Gripen? When the price is the same as F-35?
8k vs 40k per flight hour, defintely the same price
“Swedan”??? Monkeys trying to speak English.