Have We Found the Remains of Noah’s Ark?
Vložit
- čas přidán 22. 05. 2024
- Have we discovered the remains of Noah’s ark? In this episode of The Genesis Account of Noah’s Ark, Calvin Smith answers this question by looking at five places people claimed to have found Noah’s ark.
This is the ninth episode of a series titled The Genesis Account of Noah’s Ark. You can watch the other episodes here: www.Answers.tv/the-genesis-ac...
Taken from Noah's Ark Pocket Guide: AnswersinGenesis.org/store/pr... - Zábava
Jesus is our Ark
Spiritually
JE I 😅 love ❤️ you 💓 Bethlehem 😊
🎉 And he hath on His thigh a name written in blood J😮 Christ is King
An ark is a boat Jesus is a person that people said healed them and walked in water and is a god which is a make belief person but the ark is a boat from a huge flood that wiped out the earth just because it’s in the Bible doesn’t mean it has to do with god and Jesus even if it says it does
You guys seem to go into more details about all the possible locations except the location Ron Wyatt talked about. You blew off his claim quickly without expounding on it like you did for the others. The site Ron Wyatt explored was not originally found by him, but when it came to his attention he decided to examine the evidence, and he and fellow explorers found lots of of it! So much so that the ABC News show 20/20 did a story on it back in the 1980s. Lots of slam-dunk evidence was shown in that report! Ron also produced videos of his own from on-location excursions in Turkey showing some amazing evidence of a large boat/ship being in the area of Ararat in ancient times. Huge anchor stones litter the area leading up to the landing site where a petrified, pitch covered huge boat shaped object is buried in the ground (ground radar/sonar/sounding images totally verified), which, by the way, is the exact dimensions given in the Bible for the Ark! Also, rivets and metal banding which encompassed the hull were also found. Funny how none of this was shown here in this video.
I second what you said. I thought for sure he was going to talk about Wyatt’s findings (in a positive sense.) Disappointed.😔
Ron was a crook. SLam dunk eh? it was made up. Fake!
Exactly...im so happy someone else seen Ron Wyatts story...he was a true man of God and he didnt start that way .he was an archaeologist who thru God was shown many things..and our goverment is hiding the information .but Ron got out alot of info.. thank God..i believe with all my heart and soul..that the Ark was found..so silly ppl just dont want to believe its true..it is true
You are terribly delusional if you believe Ron Wyatt was anything more than a fraud. The claims he had made throughout his life simply were not based in fact. He wasn’t just a bad archaeologist that was making mistakes, he intentionally created hoaxes that he peddled as truth. His life’s work has been discredited by both the secular and non-secular fields of science and history. He claimed to have found 92 major relics in his lifetime. These would have been major, history making finds if true. They included:
The Ark
The original Tablets containing the Ten Commandments
The Ark of the Covenant
Gold for the Golden Sheep
Jesus’ Tomb and the seal stone
SERIOUSLY?! If even half of his claims had been accepted as true, he would have statues, schools and libraries around the world adorned with his name. He would be heralded as the greatest archeologist to have ever lived. But in the end, he was exposed as both a terrible scientist and a charlatan. He lied about his finds and manufactured the stories and evidence he claimed to have. Research has proven every single claim to be not true. Whether just bad science or downright fraud, none of it is true. This is not a case of Theists vs atheists or one group against the other regarding his claims. The scientific community as well as all major non-secular groups agree that none of his claims are to be believed.
Please share what facts you have to show that he was nothing more than a fraud. In what museum can we see his finds? What scientific evidence has he presented that has not been debinked?
There is literally a mountain of evidence proving him as a fake and NOTHING proving him to be right. Here is just a sample of Christian publications describing Ron’s work publish over the last 25 years:
armstronginstitute.org/801-has-the-ark-of-the-covenant-really-been-found
www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2008/may/12.62.html
www.tentmaker.org/WAR
You are choosing to believe a lie over the mountain of evidence proving him a failure. Even your church thinks he is a fraud. Have fun with your fantasy.
@@jennetthepburn4497
All the experts dismiss what you call slam dunk evidence, there is zero peer review on anything that was brought up as bring proof.
Looking at it you can tell it wasn't the ark either. The description in the Bible is a rectangle. The so called remains have pointed ends. It does not fit the description at all. As the ark was to sit on water it wouldn't need pointed ends, as there was no propulsion it didn't need pointed ends. It is just a rock formation.
The Ark “rested” somewhere it seems. The 8 survivors started the human race all over again. I am thankful the Creator had Mercy on us. When it time we will see the Ark.
Eww how incredible inbred do you think we are?
There was no Ark, no Global Flood.
So much mercy that he killed everyone and everything, including the innocent?
Go read Genesis slowly and meditate in it. The world was very corrupt. God created and He can destroy as well.@chipsutcliffe7110
@@walkergarya I've been saying that for decades....debating the religious is akin to beating one's head against the wall.
In general....the lower the IQ, the more religious one tends to be.
First, WHERE did enough water come from to flood the earth above its tallest mountains and where did it disappear to afterwards? I've posed this question to my lifetime Jehovah Witness ex SIL.....she says in exasperation...."From the heavens!"
What about Wyatt's findings? Totally ignored the radar images of the ground that he did. The one side of the structure showing beams running vertical at even spacing, the metal rivets found by the scans in the ground, the anchor boulders found scattered around it, the stones with the 8 crosses on them, the very name of the area "village of 8", even turkey has a museum near there about the ark, and lastly, the scattered wood coming down from the mountain to its resting spot. Wyatt's discovery was only revealed since the last eruption.
Wyatt's scans have shown that what we see above ground it just the upper part of the ark with the majority still buried in the ground.
I don't know how you can skip over and write off this evidence. Don't you find it compelling?
None of that is accurate. He fabricated it just like claiming to find blood on the ark and it has 24 chromosomes. Do you need to have it explained why he tells ridiculous lies mixed with one truth? His finding in Saudi Arabia on the real Mt Sinai are extremely compelling. But everything else is a lie, to discredit the Exodus. The fantastic stories in Genesis with the flood and the Exodus are two of the biggest hang ups for people. And discrediting their truth is high on the list of those that shake their fist at God.
I know right! Ron Wyatts findings must have been it.
Agreed
Answers in Genesis has investigated the character and claims of mr. Wyatt. His "evidence" is less than faulty. The only "discovery" of Wyatt that compells further investigation (in my opinion) is the location of the crossing of the Red Sea.
Ron Wyatt was blessed by Yehovah so we might see His work today and yet Ron’s discoveries are hidden by the religious church . ❤
This is Great. Wonderful job bringing this to us
Lies are not "wonderful".
The Durupinar site, and the area below it, hold a lot more evidence than what you spoke about. There are numerous drogue stones in line with the direction the structure is pointing, these stones bear engravings of crosses from medieval pilgrims that date back centuries. The GPR scans of the site show numerous evenly sized chambers in numerous levels. I'm not saying it definitely is Noah's Ark, but there is compelling evidence that suggests it's a possibility. Further exploration of the site has been forbidden by the Turkish government, so until more research is done it remains to be determined.
I’m glad somebody said it. Cause he really skipped all of that information.
*suggests it's a possibility*
That stump in my backyard suggests it was possibly Jack's Beanstalk
@@fordprefect5304 Is your stump surrounded by supporting evidence? Any giant footprints? Is it exactly the same size as Jack's beanstalk?
There is supporting evidence at the Durupinar site, but the Turkish government will not allow any further investigation.
If you're going to act smug, you might want to know about the subject being discussed. Unless you were trying to appear ignorant?
Also, no mention of Noah's wife's grave, the wood samples and rivets found, that the Turkish government acknowledged it was Noah's Ark and even built the information center with Ron Wyatt as a special guest for the ground-breaking ceremony. Th 3-D image from the GPR is also very hard to dismiss. His videos and testimony (on this and other discoveries) prove to me he is an honest man.
@@markurgero9397 Oh no not another cultic follower of the late great nurse
*Ron "The Fraud" Wyatt*
I really like you, brother.. but abounding scientific data points to the fact that the Turkey’s location re Ron’s testimony is the real deal… I humbly suggest you revisit and update your research on Ron locations.
The area God chose for the ark to rest would've had to been suitable to unload safely the multitude on board, the idea of elephants etc abseiling down vertical peaks is ridiculous, so that rules out most of the sites shown here...the site made popular by ron wyatt seems more plausible to me.
*_God Bless_*
With all due respect, the narrator and writers need to do their homework more thoroughly.
The Word of God says the Noah's ark came to rest on the MOUNTS of Ararat. It did not say it came to rest on a single mountain with the name of Ararat. Thus volcanic activity is not secluded to just one mountain, the ark rested on that mountain which is a volcano, and therefore his depiction wouldnt cause such a likely situation whereby the eruptions over the years would have destroyed the ark
Concerning him saying the ark wouldnt have been found since Noah and his family would have used up all or much of the wood from the ark, think about it.
The ark was immense, thus had A LOT of firewood and other uses of the wood for MANY months and months to come. Also keep in mind everyone that when the waters started subsiding right after the 40 days n nights of rain and under ground springs, its not like there werent any trees that would have been found laying scattered across the hillsides or down in the valleys.
The video talks about episodes how come I can’t find them?
They disappeared like the Ark and any credibility Ron once had.
I firmly believe that Bob Cornuke is a sensationalist. I place low confidence in his claims.
We God really protect the ark and Noah 's family. Thank for the documentary!!❤😂🎉😢😮😮😅😊😊🙏🙏🌍🌍😇😇😇🌏🌏😂
About the Ararat Anomaly....The western plateau has in fact been explored by BJ Corbin, who wrote a book about exploring with the reports of many explorers. He said they used a home made GPR but couldn't see anything, but think the ice cap there was about 250 feet thick. And it is just a rock.
What seems to be scattered pieces of a broken superstructure on _Mount Ararat_ are all over the mountain, some of them reaching almost the foothills of this volcanic peak, but, they are very well camuflaged by ice, snow, land and lava. The issue is that you have to know what you're looking for when you're studying satellite images of Mount Ararat, that's the point of why many people think there's nothing on _Mt Ararat,_ but, yes, there they are.
He lost me in the beginning when he said, (if)? the Ark were to be found on Mount Ararat. I believe in Ron Wyatt's findings. Too many things found at Ron's site to be coincidence.
*_God Bless_*
Ron Wyatt was a self-promoting hustler who "discovered" a natural rock formation (frequently misidentified as a boat) which any professional geologist would recognize as a doubly plunging syncline. Also, the flood story is FILLED with hyperbole that would have been recognized by its ancient audience as a figurative description of an event in order to produce an effect and make a theological point, and NOT an example of ancient journalism or accurate science.
I think it's crazy (and suspicious) that no expeditions have gone to site #3. Why? I guess maybe if God wants Noah's Ark to be found, it will be in the time that He prescribes.
The flood story is FILLED with hyperbole that would have been recognized by its ancient audience as a figurative description of an event in order to produce an effect and make a theological point, and NOT an example of ancient journalism or accurate science.
I think that if God says where it was landed in the Bible then he is directly referring to the high probability that he wants it to be revealed. Like all other things he has revealed.
What if the wood got petrified?
This man is filming this video in the Ark
It's sad to see that some people are more interested in finding some pieces of rotten wood that may have been part of the ark instead of being focused on walking with Jesus now in the present and waiting for His glorious return.
Many people don't believe because Jesus spoke of the ark and Noah as they are real. So the Exodus and the flood are points of doubt for people that are brain washed. You aren't too far off though. We are to evangelize through the law to show guilt and the path of salvation from the cross, where all men including God's enemies were reconciled to him.
Your reasoning is very limited and immature. One can love Jesus and walk closely with Him and also have a love for searching out the locations where some of God's greatest miracles took place. Both realities go together just fine. Many Biblical explorers are actually motivated by their love for the God of the Bible.
If it was to be found then what? Will it make them closer to Jesus? No.... who ever is looking for things that should not be found should go read Revelations all of it... and understand every word
@@msindiamlivenow6690 There is no book in the Bible called "Revelations". Tell you haven't studied the Bible without telling me you haven't studied the Bible. Acts of the Apostles tells of Saul of Tarsus, called Paul, how he reasoned from the scriptures in his preaching. It is good to know these things.
Big question. Where was Noah living while he built the ark? Could he have been in what we call North America? Maybe the ark floated in from along way?
I heard a theory that said that the gopher wood used was found in the Mississippi delta.
@@turdferguson2982 NOPE! ALL of the gopher wood had been previously devoured by hungry gophers! So, instead, Noah used Squirrelwood & Opposomwood!
@@blackholeentry3489 I don't get it.
@@turdferguson2982 So, HOW old are you? It's supposed to be a joke!
@blackholeentry3489 the kind of joke that isn't funny? Like your mom?
I appreciate the overall effort you all have put forth in this. 2:18 in is a good example of what goes on today. Many mix lies with the truth, to discredit themselves when they did tell the truth, as they literally serve the prince of power of the air. And appear as an angel of light. If it is on the mountain we call Ararat after the fact, it is up over the Ahora gorge, and not visible most of the time with the snow and fog. There is one absolute picture that matches the early claims and later drawing by Elfred Lee. Whatever that is, is up there. But it will be nearly impossible to prove, when the Bible say nothing about the ark's survival. 4:36 in, that is the drawing of the picture that Ahmed Arlsan photographed in 1989.
❤thank you
Sorry. Verified by the ministry of culture in Turkey in 2005 by seismic test shows a very large structure approximately 600 meters west of the glacial source of the Ahorah gorge between the Abich 1 and Parrot glaciers. The structure is a 6:1 rectangle that seems to indicate the cubit used for construction was much longer than currently speculated. It seems to be about 100 feet under the ice. It has a roughly 57 degree orientation. Unfortunately it is not where the Koran says it’s supposed to be so the Turks won’t release any information about it. Hasn’t any of you armchair archaeologists wondered why that particular area of Mount Ararat has a military restriction? If you don’t believe me just try to go there and see what happens.
What are your sources for all that information?
@@lanemedcalf9506 I was part of a group called Project Von Bora. After presenting our various evidence to the ministry of culture we had the only archeological site approved by the Turkish government for Mt Ararat. They were so convinced that there might be something they actually shut the mountain off for public access for almost a decade in 1994. Our site is that spot. The Turks conducted test on their own and have kept that area off limits to the public at large. If you want to climb Mt Ararat, you certainly can. But it will be only from the south side to the summit.
how many pieces has it broken into now? 4? 5?
@@geoff3103 amazingly the satellite photo we obtained after their seismic blast indicated that it’s still in one piece.
@@sparhawk5515 wow. these the coordinates? 39°43'37"N 44°17'35"E. Or are these too low? More higher up?
I firmly believe that Noahs Ark finally resides in Pampanga Mount Arayat in Central Luzon of Philippines this mountain is named by the Ancient Filipinos before the Spaniards arrived in 1521 in the Philippines k!
i have a quick question , how did Noah get spiders on the ark? dont they eat each other after secs? or other animals that do the same.
The Holy Quran itself reveals about the purpose of its revelation in the following words....
"A guidance and mercy for the righteous ones." (Surah Luqman Verse 3)
Who are the righteous ones?
This is also answered in Surah Baqarah, Verse 3 and 4
"Those who guard against evil, believe in the unseen, are steadfast in their prayers, spend out of what Allah have provided for them and who believe in that which was revealed upon Prophet Muhammad and that which was revealed before him, and are certain of the hereaftar".
While not impossible there might be some remains, it was made of wood not many wood remains are found that old none that I know of.
Except for the ones there if you caught up on some recent news there was a scan done at the first site that showed wood that was a couple thousand years old preserved by the dirt and mud
Are you sure that you're not sitting in Nami's wooden box? I bet that's the first thing most viewers thought when it went back to you in your chair. 😂 8:13
Now that I have seen how you pick and choose your info to facilitate your beliefs about the ark, I will no longer watch your videos. You did an injustice to the Ron Wyatt claims in spectacular fashion by not informing people of the vast amount of evidence that was found at that site. Is it because he was a 7 Day Adventist? Most Christians will not even give acknowledgment to any evidence if it falls away from their doctrines. Shame on you. It may be possible that your walk with God is predominate on doctrine instead of truth and love.
Do you mean the late great nurse?
*Ron "The Fraud" Wyatt*
@@fordprefect5304 Great rebuttal. Full of facts and insight. ....NOT. People often resort to name calling instead of debating facts when they got nothing. Might be that someones feelings got hurt.
@@jeffreyrigby2387 There are no facts.
*Ron "The Fraud" Wyatt* was just that a complete and total fraud.
How's this ole Ronnie made some 90 claims.
Show me proof that one was real.
Ron Wyatt has found the Ark!
@@AMo-fp9so Oh no!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Another delusion follower of the late great nurse.
*Ron "THE FRAUD" Wyatt*
Let's get this straight, after the tumultuous floods that wiped out almost every living tree in the world, Noah was welcome to a land of muck, miar and utter devastation. If you had an ark and decided to Branch out with our new families where would you get your wood? What would you use for your shelter? In the times before the flood men built with stone in beautiful megalithic structures and a scoffed at Noah for building with wood. The ark was simply recycled as any good Christian would do...
Didn't say nothing about Ron Wyatt hmm! wonder why. Noah's Ark been discovered
*_God Bless_*
Are you referring to the late great nurse?
*Ron "The Fraud" Wyatt*
@@fordprefect5304 It is known he didn't discover the Ark but revisted and he dug deeper from a true christian heart
@@antoniobrown8726 The ark is a fairy tale so grow up and accept reality.
@@antoniobrown8726 Ole
*Ron "The Fraud" Wyatt* was just that a fraud.
The ark is a fairy tale even most Christians don't believe in.
Well presented. See you then.
They found the ark
Wow cool. Was it next to the uss enterprise?
@@kasperpedersen1527 no it was on the side of mount Ararat and preserved from a volcano . In the exact size as mentioned in the Bible.
@@kasperpedersen1527 if you think the Bible is a fairy tale , I feel sorry for you. I pray that you will turn to Christ one day
@@chadwolf5596 if there is someone you should feel sorry for its the person that takes old stone age village fables literal and at face value.
This brought out all the *Ron "The Fraud" Wyatt* cultists.
Short answer?...NO Auf Wiedersehen :-)
Ron Wyatt found it. Thats why there is military blockage of that area
Ron Wyatt was a self-promoting hustler who "discovered" a natural rock formation (frequently misidentified as a boat) which any professional geologist would recognize as a doubly plunging syncline. Also, the flood story is FILLED with hyperbole that would have been recognized by its ancient audience as a figurative description of an event in order to produce an effect and make a theological point, and NOT an example of ancient journalism or accurate science.
In the early 1950’s, Elizabeth Greber, the wife of the now famous pastor Johannes Greber (the Author of "Communication With the Spirit World of God, It's Laws and Purpose”), related a moment when a Heavenly Spirit intervened during a Sunday School class at their church.
Elizabeth had begun to tell the children of the story of Noah's Ark in the Bible. . . and how God caused the whole planet to be flooded by rain, as the Bible says. . . BUT, Before she could begin, a heavenly spirit appeared and told Elizabeth: "Why don't you tell the children what really happened."
And here is what that high spirit of God said to her, which she began to relate to the children as the holy spirit spoke to her:
"The earliest civilisation in Noah's day consisted only of about fifty thousand people on the planet. These people lived on a peninsula off the Arabian coast.
The corruption of the people of that day had grown to such an extreme that there was no manner they could be brought back into good and moral existence. God determined that the people should be wiped out and replaced by souls who could incarnate into Noah's lineage where they could be taught truth and moral standards in order to continue to develop good character in order to progress back to Heaven.
Noah was told to move outside of town and to build a very large boat that could carry his family, his livestock, and enough food for more than a year. Noah was given specific details of how to build that craft, with exact size, that information which has been preserved in the Bible. It had to be built to withstand great pressure.
He spent many years in his spare time to build this very large craft. When it was done, he and his family began to live in this craft.
Finally, after many years, God sent an angel who told Noah to bring in all the farm animals, for the next day would begin the end of civilisation as he knew it. God did not tell Noah to take two of every animal of the earth, but only his farm animals onto the Ark. The entire planet did not flood but only the peninsula which the population of the earth at that time had inhabited. With only 50,000 people on the planet it was not necessary to destroy all the land, but only to clear off the corrupt generations of that time. He was to close the door behind his farm animals and all the remaining food for themselves, as well as food for all the farm animals..
Just before mid-day a great sound was heard of a rushing wind of water, all which sound the same when it blows strong and the waves lash against it.
A great tsunami wave of water from the ocean rose rapidly over the land and drowned all the corrupt people of that day except for Noah and his family, his farm animals and food and supplies, safe in the great boat.
The peninsula off the Arabian coast had sunken completely, along with the total population of the earth at that time, about 50,000 people, drowned in that tsunami. The coast is still under water to this day.
The boat drifted upward with the wave and met dry land midway up the mountains of Ararat in Saudi Arabia. The wave receded and the Ark remained on that mountain side just inside the Turkish border..
Noah and his family lived in that boat, along with their animals on the lower decks, until the yards and pens and barns to house all his livestock could be built. It took more than a year to do this. Only after this did he begin to build his own house in the valley below. And when the house was done, he moved all his family and his livestock to that valley.
The entire world did not flood, it was not a rain, but a large wave of water. There were only 50,000 people on the planet at that time. It was not two of every animal. It was only his extended family and livestock."
And that is the true story of Noah and his ark / ship.
AHHHHHahahahaha!
Noah was smart enough to build the Ark, I believe the Ark would NOT have landed ON TOP of a mountain, thus making his family trek a long hard climb down. I'd like to believe the Ark landed in a valley in the area of the mountains, and used the lumber for shelter, fire. Even wood has a live span, and it surly rotted in the years after.
I doubt the flood waters went anywhere fast, so the tops of mountains is all there was. They could only descend as the water receded.
The Bible says it landed in the mountains. You are thinking Himalayas and the difficulty of climbing jagged rocks. Rather than pre-flood mountains that are more like smooth hills.
Dude it was a flood that covered the entire earth the boat wasn’t just going on land but remember buddy take a second to thing about something you comment and say hmmm is there evidence to back up my response?
It is on a mountain side in Turkey, just like the bible said it is.
This nonsense is just sad. Christians are often told we must read the Flood story as literal history, giving us a detailed straightforward description of the Flood. Ken Ham insists on this and accuses anyone who disagrees with him of having betrayed the Bible, and even the Gospel. According to Ham, If you don’t believe that there was a global flood with waters that even covered the highest mountains and that Noah and his family survived in a 510 foot wooden boat with pairs of all the animals of the world on board, then you don’t really think that the Bible is true. To support his view, he marshals “scientific evidence” that no research geologist, even Christians, would support, since that evidence has been long discredited. The irony is that Ken Ham has not only misrepresented the science but misreads the Bible. The flood story is FILLED with hyperbole that would have been recognized by its ancient audience as a figurative description of an event in order to produce an effect and make a theological point, and NOT an example of ancient journalism or accurate science. As for that natural rock formation in Turkey championed by the fraudster Ron Wyatt among others, any professional geologist would recognize it as a doubly plunging syncline and nothing more.
Studies show it is just a rock formation.
It’s on Mt Ariat , just like the Bible says!
It is actually at the north pole under the rainbow. 😅
*_Gen 8:4 And in the seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the month, the ark rested upon the mountains of Ararat._* *_KJB_*
"Mountains," plural. It is a range of mountains, Mt Ararat is a volcano.
Mount Ararat is an active volcano and has since Noah to our days had many eruptions.Therefore found Noah fire for his first offering after the flood. You cannot expect to find wood from some thousand years ago unburned.
that's coinvent
Or not rotted away to begin with.
Common sense tells me that the wood would have been used for shelter, materials, tools, and structures. Why let it go to waste and rot while you're beginning a new civilization?
Because it was an artifact that saved the world and also it didn’t rot because the mud and dirt preserved it
Surely it's rotted by now!
Because it was an artifact that saved the world and also it didn’t rot because the mud and dirt preserved it
I thought the mythical flood was 12 thousand years ago. No nails or iron back then. Where did Noah launch from compared to this region where he allegedly landed?
I'm not sure where he did but it was a bit over 4,000 years ago when they had good technology for boat building
After the pyramids were built?@@patriotseangd
@@czarcastic1458 before, basically people knew of god and many of his rules before but then he needed them to be retold through Moses due to how much the flood impacted the overall knowledge the newer generations after Noah had of God, the pyramids themselves during Moses’ time were built on a lot of slavery
The sheer amount of plain observations you have to reject for the ark to have existed is staggering.
Was it found in Turkey already? RON WYATT.
*_God Bless_*
Ron Wyatt was a self-promoting hustler who "discovered" a natural rock formation (frequently misidentified as a boat) which any professional geologist would recognize as a doubly plunging syncline. Also, the flood story is FILLED with hyperbole that would have been recognized by its ancient audience as a figurative description of an event in order to produce an effect and make a theological point, and NOT an example of ancient journalism or accurate science.
1:20 "eastern turkey, near borders of armenia and iran" That is just Kurdistan .. were Kurds lived since the flood, thus no history mentions were Kurds came from since they were already there and all other nations started spreading
There never was any global flood.
That is not Noah's ark. The ark has been found by a Chinese team up on Mount Ararat. Noah's ark was built square like a barge. It didn't look like a typical boat. It is where site 3 shows. That's it.
DOI?
The NAMI outfit found squat.
To many if, but, ands.
By the way your Ark went no bloody where
You have really made a big mistake with regards to Ron Wyatt’s findings.. I suspect it’s because for whatever reasons you did not really put the kind of effort to truly have an informed opinion.. you have basically done what you cautioned about in this video- rushing to make decisions on unvaried details - but this time, you’re the one who rushed.. you’re good Çhristian and I like most of your videos…but on this one ,I really believe you are wrong.. I have crossed checked on solid Çhristian research works which employed state of the art technology along US Government Labs and Turkey’s Government and Universities… they have solid evidences that reaffirm it’s Noah’s Ark.plus other scientific research data have debunked the idea that it’s a natural geological phenomenon ..Ron’s work is continuing to get more and more support from Çhristian researchers and the scientific communities involved.
What a pack of lies/wishful thinking. Can you reference ANY independent science journal where such preposterous claims have passed peer review and achieved publication? Or is this just a crop of loony hyper-religious conspiracy theorys?
Why would the would LOVE TO FIND THE ARK? When they hate the Bible?
This nonsense is just sad. Christians are often told we must read the Flood story as literal history, giving us a detailed straightforward description of the Flood. Ken Ham insists on this and accuses anyone who disagrees with him of having betrayed the Bible, and even the Gospel. According to Ham, If you don’t believe that there was a global flood with waters that even covered the highest mountains and that Noah and his family survived in a 510 foot wooden boat with pairs of all the animals of the world on board, then you don’t really think that the Bible is true. To support his view, he marshals “scientific evidence” that no research geologist, even Christians, would support, since that evidence has been long discredited. The irony is that Ken Ham has not only misrepresented the science but misreads the Bible. The flood story is FILLED with hyperbole that would have been recognized by its ancient audience as a figurative description of an event in order to produce an effect and make a theological point, and NOT an example of ancient journalism or accurate science. As for that natural rock formation in Turkey championed by the fraudster Ron Wyatt among others, any professional geologist would recognize it as a doubly plunging syncline and nothing more.
😂😂😂😂😂
That boat had a lot of lumber in it. Had it been me I would have built a house with it for starters.
A 100 million dollar wood house
Nobody build wood/timber framed houses then... but whatever
@@JOinLC351 in 2016?
@@JOinLC351 More like stone buildings and or we know people did live in caves, carved out to look like houses.
Why build houses when you had a perfectly good structure to live in until the lands dried and flourished again. It would be insane to dismantle the Ark when it wasnt necessary.
God Culture video proves Himala'yah mount Everest as sighting. Remember also oxygen before Noah's flood was 50% higher than now, therefore length of Adam and Noah was 12ft Tall, making their 'el' measurement vastly exponential greater than modern man thinks! Ark was Elohim' design! Turkey is the false Ararat.
I do believe in God. I believe he created the universe and all living things. To know him, it's better to study Nature than the Bible.
The Bible was written by men, Nature was "written" by God.
If you sincerely love God, stay away from men who speak in his name and don't know him. They are liars and blasphemers!
Have yo seen a good psychiatrist
The Ark could have been made of cardboard. Since God was in charge everything went just fine.
No, you see god closed the door and made it rain and literally forgot about the ark so he did nothing (don't believe me read Genesis 8:1), that is not melodramatic either, otherwise you admit the Bible is a book of fiction.
Given Eve didn't listen to god it is clear god has no power, and before you cry "Free Will" understand god can make sure all is known and we still have freedoms.
@@ThyBountyHunter WHAT? This comment is highly uninformed.
@@slotfreak7094 That all you have, an opinion it is uninformed.
Lets see, I said Genesis 8:1:
"But God remembered Noah and all the wild animals and the livestock that were with him in the ark, and he sent a wind over the earth, and the waters receded"
Oh look it said he remembered...as I said to remember one has to have forgotten, nope not uninformed there.
God is all powerful, and Eve clearly ate the forbidden fruit, however he failed to convey why exactly. Stating they would die is not a valid thing as death wasn't a thing then so how was Eve to know that was bad?
Nope, not uninformed there.
How about this, take a moment, get your thoughts together and PROVE I am uniformed.
Your personal opinion that lacks backing is weak.
@@ThyBountyHunter that’s all I need
@@slotfreak7094 Ya to satisfy yourself and I have no issues.
However to those passing by you have nothing, and you are nothing, which is all you need....to do nothing.
I believe the true Noah’s ark site resides in Australia. Frenchman’s peak is the true Mt Ararat
Yeah you believe much you.
Honestly if there were just 8 people after the flood and they need to rebuild, why would the just not dismantle the Ark and repurpose the material. If not the first 8 people, then his descendants could have just taken it apart. I bet wood would be precious on top of a mountain where there’s likely little to no wood!
Good content, but annoying presentation.
The answer to that question is, _not yet._ Despite countless expeditions and a lot of searching for the remains of Noah's Ark on Mount Ararat, there has been no definitive proof of the existence of this ship on that mountain. Many people have proposed several other places such as Mount Judi on the border of Turkey and Syria, Mount Suleiman in northern Iran or Durupinar site in eastern Turkey, but the biblical account says in Genesis 11:2 "And it came to pass as they (Noah's descendants) journeyed _from the east,_ that they found a plain in the land of Shinar, and they dwelt there." It is supposed that Noah's Ark landed on Mount Ararat, but, Noah's descendants were not in the surroundings areas of Mount Ararat or in another place of Turkey or Armenia, _they were in the east,_ The question is: Why _all of them_ were in _the east?_ There could possibly be a place that we're ignoring.
Logical fallacy. Some people went east. Not all people after the ark went east. It just doesn't say what you are repeating.
@@nickma71 I respect your point of view, but, there's a place where the satellite images show something whose characteristics seem very similar to Noah's Ark's characteristics in the bible.
@@joseramonperez9609 Your making things up. You get the last word.
@@nickma71 In the book of Genesis 11:2 clearly says that they journeyed _from the east",_ the biblical account clearly says that they were all _in the east,_ rather it seems that you have not read the text well.
@@joseramonperez9609Yes indeed, "they journeyed from the East"
From the East, means they went West.
Noahs ark was buried by Bigfoot at the north pole under Santa's workshop.
😂
WOW I was starting to think you had your head and heart in the right place, but after hearing this nonsense about Price/Wyatt not being allowed to be part of the team that discovered it in 2008-2010 I regress. Price/Wyatt were not allowed because of their selfish arrogant prideful hearts, we all see that. God had humble people locate it on Ararat in 2008-2010. You should listen to Jesus and get the sense of things and realize you need a good heart with a good motive, or God will just use you and then replace you, be careful what you guys choose to say. Remember satan had a good and clean start when God created him perfect, he chose to go bad himself, stick to the TRUTH.
Discover it in 2008-2010? It was discovered in 1949. Ron Wyatt was a fraud and a con man.
Ron Wyatt had a good heart and was doing the Lord's bidding.
Few believe him, few will follow the narrow path.
@@canadiankewldude Ron Wyatt was a con man.
If taking credit for finding the ark is gods plan then why is god letting them lie?
The site was discovered in the 40's. Not the 80's or 2,000's.
For Genesis 7:20, the KJV says:
"Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains were covered."
the New King James Bible says:
"The waters prevailed fifteen cubits upward, and the mountains were covered."
The New International Version shows in the main text:
"The waters rose and covered the mountains to a depth of more than fifteen cubits."
My comment:
When Noah's Ark reached 15 cubits above the highest mountains the oxygen ran out and the temperature plummeted far below zero. The Ark remained in this "Death Zone" for days or weeks, long enough to kill everyone aboard the Ark, leaving the planet unpopulated.
God lied, and you don't care about facts if they don't support what you want to believe.
Simple answer: NO WE HAVEN'T. Next question???
The Bible narratives, it landed in the mountains of Ararat, not Mt Ararat. Himalayan mountains is the mountains of Ararat in ancient times.
There is a video where the person who made it mentions that Mt. Everest was his idea because this would have been the first mountain to appear above the waters when they began to recede. This could be a problem since the slope would have been too steep. There could have been a second or third highest mountains in the Himalayas region that could have provided a safer place for the Ark to land. I'm not familiar with the area, so someone who does might speculate such places. However, the areas worth checking out are likely be hard to explore.
Santa's sleigh
Leave what God made to be used then unseen alone !!!!!!!!
*NO*
There has never been an ark
Boring !
There never was any Noah's Ark. It is a fairy tale.
Just like the alleged global flood.
Not true it's real
@@billwilkerson2415 Nope. There never was any global flood.
You can’t find something that only existed in someone’s imagination.
The "imaginations" of hundreds of cultures who tell the same story. 🎉
hahahah ...
@@nickroberts-xf7oq
@@nickroberts-xf7oq , No, not the same story and most if not all predate the Bible one. The Bible story was likely influenced by the Epic of Gilgamesh. Most civilizations grew up around rivers or the sea, so flood stories are not surprising.
So says you
@@davidgardner863
Wrong again !
The shared details are identical.