Yasir Qadhi and the Reality of Shirk
Vložit
- čas přidán 24. 07. 2024
- Support us on Patreon: / digitalmimbar 00:00-29:25: Defining Ibadah
29:26-48:25: The differences between Ibn Taymiyyah and Ibn Abdul Wahhab
48:26-54:55: Regarding Prophet ‘Isa (عليه السلام) resurrecting the dead
54:56-59:40: Regarding Dr. Sultan al-Umayri’s works
59:41-1:04:49: Is it always wrong to “focus on the problems of other Muslims”?
1:04:50-1:10:56: Do Atharis hold “dangerous” beliefs?
1:10:57-1:23:30: What should our stance be toward Ibn Abdul Wahhab?
1:23:31-1:35:39: Regarding Dr. Yasir Qadhi’s transformation
1:35:40-end: Final words of advice on cooperation
_____________
Support Digital Mimbar, Shop Khalifah Klothing: khalifahklothing.com
Subscribe to the Digital Mimbar CZcams Channel and click on the notification bell: / khalifahklothing
Like DigitalMimbar on Facebook: / digitalmimbar
Follow DigitalMimbar on Twitter: / digitalmimbar
Support Digital Mimbar, Shop Khalifah Klothing: khalifahklothing.com
Subscribe to the Digital Mimbar CZcams Channel and click on the notification bell: czcams.com/users/khalifahklothing
Like DigitalMimbar on Facebook: facebook.com/DigitalMimbar/
Follow DigitalMimbar on Twitter: twitter.com/DigitalMimbar
May Allah (swt) bless you for putting this video together.
Jazakumullah khairan for posting such a beautiful, genuine, fair and mild response.
May Allah reward sheikh Bassam Zawadi
how is meat halal? We sacrifice it to Allah alone. Prayer & sacrifice is from acts of worship assigned by Allah & worship for Allah alone is Tawhid Ulluhiyah or Allah's Oneness as God. to expect a response in du'a or blessings of meat from other then Allah is additional shirk in Allah's Rububiyah or Lordship!
Quran 6 : 162 -
*Say (O Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم): "Verily, my Salat (prayer), my sacrifice, my living, and my dying are for Allah, the Lord of the 'Alamin.* (all that exists). -
It is shirk regardless of intention, Allah may excuse a person due to their ignorance (Qur'an 2 :22) but the act is still shirk! Yasir doesn't know Tawhid, even the pagans accepted Allah as Lord like in surah Fil and at time of hardship they called upon Allah alone, but at other times they called to other then Allah!
Qur'an 31 : 25 - *And if you ask them: "Who has created the heavens and the earth," they will certainly say: "Allah.* " Say: "All the praises and thanks be to Allah!" But most of them know not.
30. - *Allah, He is the Truth, and that which they invoke besides Him is Al-Batil*
32. - And when a wave covers them like shades they invoke Allah, *making their invocations for Him only. But when He brings them safe to land, there are among them those that stop* in between (Belief & disbelief).
Summary, Tawhid has 3 Categories:
1) Lord = Actions of the Creator
2) God = One served, or actions of the creation assigned by the Creator!
3) (Names & Attributes, not being mentioned here, but letting you know)
Qur'an 6 : 163 - "He has no partner. *And of this I have been commanded,* and I am the first of the Muslims."
~~~
Also the Grave life is from the ghaib & can't hear except textual acts like Salams :
Quran 35 :22 - Verily, Allah makes whom He wills to hear, but you cannot make hear those who are in graves. -
Quran 6 : 50 - Say (O Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم): "I don't tell you that with me are the treasures of Allah, nor (that) I know the Unseen; nor I tell you that I am an angel. *I but follow what is revealed to me."*
Abu Hurayrah narrated that the Messenger of Allah Peace & blessings on him said: “There is no one who sends Salaam upon me, but Allaah will restore to me my soul so that I may return his Salaam.” (Abi Dawood Sahih)
Sufi & shi'a are like ahlul kitab making up lies, bringing shirk & dividing the umma, Yq is an ikwani who reintro the same sufi bida that divided Uthmanis who should of accepted the salafi dawa. Tawhid is linked to safety in Qur'an 24 :55 and notice how the colonized lands are sufi & shia, while salafi grave leveling lands are safe!
"Najdi" Bani Tamim of Ibn Abdul Wahab :
Sahih Bukhaaree report of Abu Hurayra, *"I have loved the tribe of Bani Tamim, ever since I heard three things the Messenger of Allah, Sallallahu Alayhi wa Sallam, said about them I heard him saying, these people, would stand firm against the dajjaal.'* When the Saddaqat from that tribe came, the Messenger of Allah, Sallahu Alayhi wa Sallam said, "These are charitable gifts of our folk." Aa'isha had a slave girl from that tribe, and the Prophet Sallallaahu Alayhi wa Sallam said to Aa'ishah, manumit her as she is decendant of Isma'eel, alayhis Salaam."
najd of kawarij is Iraq btw :
Narrated Yusair bin `Amr:
I asked Sahl bin Hunaif, "Did you hear the Prophet (ﷺ peace and blessings be upon him) saying anything about Al-Khawarij?" He said, "I heard him saying while pointing his hand towards Iraq. "There will appear in it (i.e, Iraq) some people who will recite the Qur'an but it will not go beyond their throats, and they will go out from (leave) Islam as an arrow darts through the game's body.' " - Sahih al-Bukhari 6934, Apostates.
Numbers isn't the key to victory, (so who ignore Aqida like Yasir are wrong) :
Qur'an 9 : 25 - and on the Day of Hunain (battle) when you rejoiced at your great number, but it availed you naught
Correct Aqidah is: Qur'an 2 : 137 - So if they believe in the like of that which you believe, then they are rightly guided; but if they turn away, then they are only in opposition. So Allah will suffice you against them. And He is the All-Hearer, the All-Knower.
Top quote by the Sheikh/speaker which sums it all up " we should not let the experiences of one individual, be projected on everyone else". People get so obsessed with personalities, that when these personalities go off track on their own journeys and flow like the wind, they take the people with them. These followers feel lost and feel like they need to continue to support those personalities. But if they stuck to the Qur'an and Sunnah, they wouldn't float like this. Also the belief of Tawhid is not solely dependent on Muhammad bin Abdul Wahab. The opposition always point this out as if he is the only one who opposed Shirk. This is deceptive.
Excellent work!!! Maa shaa Allaah.
Devotion/Veneration is the Right of Allah upon his Servant.
May Allah save all Mumineen from shirk in all it's forms.
Amazing stuff maa shaa Allaah!!!
Aboo Daawood as-Sijistaanee (d. 275) said, “I said to Aboo
‘Abdullaah, Ahmad ibn Hanbal, ‘If I see a man from the Ahlus--
Sunnah sitting with a man from the people of innovation,
should I abandon speaking to him?’ He said, ‘No. You should
first inform him that the one whom you saw him with is a
person of innovation. Either he will cease speaking to the
innovator, so continue speaking to him, or if not, then regard
him to be like him. Ibn Mas’ood said, “A person is like his
friend.”
Usool As-Sunnah Imam Ahmad
This a very good presentation and thought provoking video regardless if you agree or disagree with the opinions.May Allah make us reflect on our Din.
Salaam. Its Asheeq from HealMyTajweed, I will also send you a more formal request through email Insha Allah. I would like to request permission under fair use and use part of this video in an upcoming compilation to be posted back onto CZcams. If you need more information, please get in touch Insha Allah.
May Allah guide us and make us successful ameen
Ameen
Barakallahu feekum. Very good presentation. Precise.
Is this the brother who reviewed the YQ Couse at the seminary?
yes
I did not understand the definition of the conditional act of ibadah at @11:57. Wasn't clear enough.
This guy isn't even qualified to talk about this deep topic. He made so many terrible mistakes throughout the entire video!
check out Abu Ibraheem HusNayn Aqeedah series because it's clear.
An-Nu’man ibn Bashir (رضي الله عنه ) narrated the Prophet (ﷺ) said: “Dua is worship. Then he read the verse, 'Invoke Me, [i.e. believe in My Oneness (Islamic Monotheism)] (and ask Me for anything) I will respond to your (invocation). Verily! Those who scorn My worship [i.e. do not invoke Me, and do not believe in My Oneness, (Islamic Monotheism)] they will surely enter Hell in humiliation!' [Ghafir:60]"
Collected by Abu Dawud [1479], At-Tirmithi [3372] An-Nisa’I in Al-Kubara [11464], Ibn Majah [3828]. Grade : Authentic
This should be enough. If you want, see ayah 3 of Surah Az Zumar. This should be sufficient. And if you want even more evidence then see verses 84-89 of Surah Al-Mu'minoon
Consider this verse:
The bedouins say, "We have believed." Say, "You have not [yet] believed; but say [instead], 'We have submitted,' for faith has not yet entered your hearts. And if you obey Allah and His Messenger, He will not deprive you from your deeds of anything. Indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful. --- Surah Hujurat, v.14
Then it becomes clear that if believing with your heart is not a precondition for submitting in Islam, then it is not a valid condition when considering invocations directed towards those other than Allah. Indeed, invoking other than Allah is shirk whether Yasir Qadhi wants to accept it or not.
جزاك الله خيرا
جزاك الله عنا خيرا جزاء
This is was much needed ustadh. Thank you so much
@JESUS LOVES MUSLIMS we don't. We only pray to the one true God, Allah SWT. Muhammad pbuh was nothing but a messenger. "Muḥammad is no more than a messenger; other messengers have gone before him. If he were to die or to be killed, would you regress into disbelief? Those who do so will not harm Allah whatsoever. And Allah will reward those who are grateful" [Quran 3:144]. Tell me one place in the Quran or an authentic hadith which states that Muslims should pray to the prophet PBUH like they pray to Allah SWT.
@JESUS LOVES MUSLIMS yeah, so what? It only says we are supposed to love the messenger more than anything in this world. We are also supposed to love Allah SWT more than anything. I asked for a verse/hadith which says we should worship the prophet PBUH like we worship Allah SWT or even better. Just because a verse says we should love the prophet does not mean we worship him.
@JESUS LOVES MUSLIMS I don't see how we worship him. The hadith only states the prophet PBUH ordered his companions to pray to Allah SWT to allow them to receive his intercession on the day of judgement. I said one hadith which says we should pray to the prophet PBUH like we pray to Allah SWT.
@JESUS LOVES MUSLIMS I need a reference for the hadith you have given me. I need exact references. Some hadiths may not be authentic. Also, this proves we don't worship him. Because when he said though him, it means he is not God. Like when Jesus says "I am the way..." It proves he is not God because he is only the way to God, not God himself. Like if I was on a bridge trying to get to a city, the bridge would be the way to the city, but not the city itself.
@@servantofthemostmerciful7985 yes, brother, ask for reference because Imam Tirmidhi included many weak and fabricated ahadith in his Sunan and he himself classified those ahadith as such, and that is because it was part of his methodology in that book to show widespread weak and fabricated ahadith that were circulating among the Muslims and give their ruling refuting those people who believed them.
What's the name of the speaker?
Bassam Zawadi
@@khaloodii Jazakh Allah ❤️
@@khaloodii sunni or shia
@@jackryder6732 Sunni alhumdoilah
@@khaloodii Alhamdulilah!
“Invoking saint is not shirk unless the action is accompanied by belief” .If they initially believed in Allah( one/indivisible) as a lord exclusively then why would they call upon saint((something other than Allah(the most exalted))Belief comes before the action. Calling upon saints is a very definition of shirk.
Ustadh Bassam - may Allah preserve him - is well known in the dawah scene for a long time, and also has written many excellent papers regarding theology.
Good one
00:00-29:25: Defining Ibadah
29:26-48:25: The differences between Ibn Taymiyyah and Ibn Abdul Wahhab
48:26-54:55: Regarding Prophet ‘Isa (عليه السلام) resurrecting the dead
54:56-59:40: Regarding Dr. Sultan al-Umayri’s works
59:41-1:04:49: Is it always wrong to “focus on the problems of other Muslims”?
1:04:50-1:10:56: Do Atharis hold “dangerous” beliefs?
1:10:57-1:23:30: What should our stance be toward Ibn Abdul Wahhab?
1:23:31-1:35:39: Regarding Dr. Yasir Qadhi’s transformation
1:35:40-end: Final words of advice on cooperation
Sufi & shi'a are like ahlul kitab making up lies, bringing shirk & dividing the umma, Yq is an ikwani who reintro the same sufi bida that divided Uthmanis who should of accepted the salafi dawa. Tawhid is linked to safety in Qur'an 24 :55 and notice how the colonized lands are sufi & shia, while salafi grave leveling lands are safe!
"Najdi" Bani Tamim of Ibn Abdul Wahab :
Sahih Bukhaaree report of Abu Hurayra, *"I have loved the tribe of Bani Tamim, ever since I heard three things the Messenger of Allah, Sallallahu Alayhi wa Sallam, said about them I heard him saying, these people, would stand firm against the dajjaal.'* When the Saddaqat from that tribe came, the Messenger of Allah, Sallahu Alayhi wa Sallam said, "These are charitable gifts of our folk." Aa'isha had a slave girl from that tribe, and the Prophet Sallallaahu Alayhi wa Sallam said to Aa'ishah, manumit her as she is decendant of Isma'eel, alayhis Salaam."
najd of kawarij is Iraq btw :
Narrated Yusair bin `Amr:
I asked Sahl bin Hunaif, "Did you hear the Prophet (ﷺ peace and blessings be upon him) saying anything about Al-Khawarij?" He said, "I heard him saying while pointing his hand towards Iraq. "There will appear in it (i.e, Iraq) some people who will recite the Qur'an but it will not go beyond their throats, and they will go out from (leave) Islam as an arrow darts through the game's body.' " - Sahih al-Bukhari 6934, Apostates.
Very informative thank you jazakallakhayrun
Jazak Allah ghair
Well said brother Bassam always a pleasure listening to your debates or reading your articles, especially on Multaqa Ahlul hadeeth... JazakAllaah khair.
14 :30 Beautiful point by Ibn Taymiyyah.
If sajda can be shirk and sacrifice obviously is du'a.
and in Qur'an 9 :31 ahlul kitab made their preists gods without even knowing it though they had sense to realize it! don't know why quote ibn Arabi if he's the one I think!
This was the best video I’ve watched twice on CZcams. Where can we here more on this topic from Bassam Zawadi? I don’t think there is anyone going into this detail to refute the ideas of saint worship, including all the other points and research that was brought forward?
Also no one refuted YQ as Bassam just did here. Excellent we need more
@@halalii5060 yeah exactly it's a detailed response on all the points he mentioned this is what i was waiting for most people didn't even watch the video or responded by hearsay. Shaykh dimashqia also has a great response from another angle.
That is so funny! He made so many mistakes and false accusations, it's barely even a valid response. Calling it best video proves how stupid and ignorant some people are nowadays.
@@shafqatishan437 show us the mistakes oh wise one
@@shafqatishan437Are you seriously going to defend the lgbt advocate?
masha'Allah.. based lecture
Yasir Qadhi repeats that there are larger issues in the Ummah, but how is he dealing with them? You see him politically supporting rights to LGBT marriage. He repeats he wants to cooperate and doesn’t want to continue on critiquing other groups, but what do you see him do? Always criticizing Salafis while keeping silent about those that are much worse like Shabir Ally (who denies authentic Hadith, doesn’t believe in some of the punishments, doesn’t deem it haram for a woman to uncover her hair) and the likes.
It’s a Common liberal Muslim tactic used in the west. ‘Don’t talk about innovation, we got bigger problems!’ is their favourite statement. But why can’t we just do both? Really it’s just cowardice and trying to get out of controversy. These western imams have no sincerity and want to just build their fan bases while saying nothing that will drop their fangirl Numbers. Same with lgbt, if he speaks against it he’ll lose numbers. This ‘larger issues’ argument is just an excuse.
Can you cite a source where Yasir Qadhi politically supports rights to LGBT marriage ?
@@ahmedc3227 czcams.com/video/8LlDKtzi2H0/video.html
Pls tell me whats wrong with yasir qadhi. I always listen to him
Pls tell me whats wrong with yasir qadhi. I always listen to him
Interesting talk, though you should have had more justice on representing YQ's ideas and character. A topic worth further scrutiny.
Why don't you try talking to the Shaykh to clarify some of the topics you've brought up? Whether private, or maybe, and better yet, try to make it public if you can. It's worth it if you're sincere. IA.
1:39:00
Are you referring to Yasir Qadhi here?
Masha' Allah, you love to learn about Islam and you LOVE to learn about Islam :)
And I was like you, I used to love Yasir Qadhi because he explains in an easy way, and he put alot of details when he makes a lecture. But when I was told that he said this and this, he says ALOT of false stuff when he is talking about something. And he is not trustworthy anymore
I started to defend him "I know him for a long time, why would he lie", anybody can be a liar!
But now Allah opened my eyes, Yasir Qadhi is not to be followed anymore.
I dont want my faith to be corrupted because of him, so I try to be safe and not listen to him.
Look for trustworthy Islamic teachers, research about them.
If you want to be safe then listen to the real shuyukh like Ibn U'theymeen(r.a), Salih Al-Fawzan (h.a), Al-Albani (r.a), Ibn Baz (r.a)
May Allah protect us and make us follow the Quran and the authentic ahadiths of Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w) ameen
@@nufailanoon lol do you cut and paste this same response to anyone you assume is defending or standing up for YQ?
@@nufailanoon don’t be a bot :/
He's anger, judgmental attitude, and false accusations got exposed on that very minute.
@@shafqatishan437
Exactly. Even though he tries to be objective at the beginning, it's quite evident he's too wed to his own creed.
Regardless of Isa AS had the power to raise the dead in the manner you described it, it would not have been shirk to ask him of something, knowing that Allah gave him that power at that time. At most its a misunderstanding. Assuming Allah swt did give him that power, and he believes that only through Allah can Isa AS help, how is this shirk? It is the same as the man asking Prophet Muhammad SAW to be his companion in Jannah. The cop outs on these questions are mad nocap. Feel bad for sh.yasir.
Do u think there is no difference between asking by assuming he MAY have this special power given at a specific instance for specific people and believing firmly that he HAS been given that power in general ? And is there no difference between asking in life and after death?
Isa ('alayhis salam) could only raise the dead by the permission of Allah when he was among the people. Let's say someone asks Isa ('alayhis salam) for help now? How can he help?!
If you are confused right now Listen to this lecture
czcams.com/video/6V_QIwkYqCE/video.html
Does anyone know who Bassam has studied with and who his shuyookh are? Any one calling him Ustadh/Shaykh should easily be able to answer this. Can Digital Mimbar maybe answer this?
I doubt you get an answer lol coz he another self taught you tuber.
@@rehanmir4560 I hope people realise that before social media and CZcams people like this wouldn’t even be recognised let alone heard.
Finally a detailed response
ASalam Aleikum brother what's up?
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 alhamdulilah doing good brother what about you
The takeaway from this is all forms of sujood other than to Allah swt is haram whether it is an act of worship or not. Point and simple.
No it's not . Unless done with the intention of ibadah .
@@mahbubrm2148 that's incorrect.
Regardless of one's intention if worship is directed to other than Allah swt, this is Shirk. If one does not worship but instead asks the dead for help either for things in this world or intercede for him to Allah this not shirk but major bid'ah and haram!
So either way, making sujood to other than Allah swt regardless of of your intention is Haram!
Definitely.
@@mahbubrm2148 Please reveal Surah and Ayat where you found this since I am unaware of such a statement in the Mushaf. Instead there are repeated prohibitions throughout against associating anything or anyone with Allah. One Ayat which sums this matter all up states:
"The things you worship besides Allah are false gods and you forge lies. Those whom you worship besides Allah don't have the means to provide sustenance for you. Therefore seek sustenance and provision for yourself from Allah and worship Him and give Him thanks for you will be brought back to Him"
(29:17).
May Allah grant us all peace, knowledge and truth.
@@mahbubrm2148 Absolutely wrong.
please remove the ads
CZcams doesn't allow to remove ads anymore.
@@shamalkareem7285 wait really? I mean you cant disable the monetization?
@@syedarman4720 Basically, they will show ads whether or not you monetize the video. So, there is no way of knowing if the video is monetized or not.
Ibada is of 2 types (service and worship)
not rocket science Shirk simply associating anything or anyone as equal to god. the Quran is clear and the Quran explanation is direct and clear cannot be interpreted in different ways. for example, Making Jesus equal to God is a shirk and unforgivable sin, that is it.
Not rocket science but 1000 years of ulema got it wrong, only Abd al Wahab knows the truth!
I'll refrain from comments, but, suffice, for me to say, get your info, with direct quotes from Arabic books, on this subject from channel: Bro Hajji.
LOL, stop listening to these people akhi.
In that lecture Shaikh Dr Yasir Qadhi makes a point of still being on the Athari theology but the Ustadh here starts with the claim that Yasir Qadhi says he left the Athari school. The Athari theology is not to be confused with the Najdi Salafi theology which Yasir Qadhi claims to have left.
His concept of ibada is completely opposed to that of all athari scholarship
He even admits in the video that he's in a "post-athari" phase
Masha Allah
what a cop out on the Abdul what question.
I found his answer spot on.
We don't attach ourselves to fallible personalities, I personally do respect the Shaykh, but understand why people would oppose him but seems it is more a political issue than a religious one.
@@muaazseedat7989 he actually answered it from every way possible the supporters and opposers and to not attach ourselves to people other than the Prophet sallalaahu alaihi wa sallam so i don't know what he's talking about cop out some people just don't listen
Oya alaikumussalam oya rohmatollah
Are you from sunny or shia?
Secondly Yasir Qadhi is confusing. Betteroff not even bother listening to this level or topics of this type, which brings fithna and devilish results.
Hold on to Quran and sunna. Thats it.
Its clear in Quran its a shirk as how people at the tine of prophet used to worship, still call themselves Muslims but Allah said they are not.
Sometime deep knowledge causes more problems. If you cant handle it. I can see Yasir Qadhi keeps changing his opinion every few years. Like a U turn. Keep it simple as our beloved prophet said.
I dont watch his videos anymore. Alhamdulillah, also updated my family. Hold on strong the rope of Allah and correct Akhida mentioned in our Kalima. SIMPLE
Totally agree
Yes, we have to hold onto teaching of Quran and authentic teachings but Islamic teachings have to understood the way earlier Muslim understood from prophet Mohammed (pbuh). For this we have dalil. To gain correct knowledge it require years and years extensive knowledge in Islamic curriculum from proper Islamic universities. If every Tom, Dick and Harry read Quran and Hadith and give their own understanding then even nonemuslim can give their understanding too and that would be disaster. Muslim must always try to understand Islamic teachings from earlier great Giant scholars and not from many modern day speakers that give modern twists to Islamic teachings. Islam is a pristine religion and those speakers that are twisting it to justify their own agenda we have to be careful of them. Our obligation belongs Allah and all must worship Him the way prophet taught and this is what the earlier generations of Muslim understood better. Peace ✌️
Subhanallah
I also not following his interpretations again after i watched his videos and i became more confused
misguided callers are to be rejected. I pray Allah guides them. Yasir Qadhi promotes shirk, civil wars and shi'a paganism directly! Khomeini said Ali's son has a new Qur'an and shi'a mehdi matches dajjal, think on that!
I applaud your efforts but this is so long winded and unnecessary. One can dismantle YQ in under 10 seconds: The Prophet (SAW) said "Dua is Worship itself" (Adua huwal i'bada) [Sunan Tirmidhi, Sahih according to Albani]
Any kind of worship to anyone other than Allah = Shirk. FULL STOP.
Lol if only life was that simple my friend
People who ask the prophet or a saint will say it is not a dua per say. It is just requesting the prophet or a pious to intercede to allah on their behalf and they don't intend worship when they make that request. Just like if I ask you to make dua for me, it does not mean I am worshipping you. YQ position and majority of scholars opinion outside the Najdi bubble will say it's a mistake to ask the dead to intercede because they can no longer do that and therefore it's not Shirk but just innovation.
@@ByChoiceMuslim You can ask someone who is ALIVE to make DUA for you. BUT YOU cannot ask someone who is dead to make DUA for you.
Yes the Prophet will intercede on Day of Judgement, but why dont you do your best here on Earth and on that Day ask the Prophet to request Allah to bring mercy to you.
Moreover, why hinge on asking the Prophet here? Why dont you ask Allah yourself? Why are you convoluting the formula?
@@dom3073 why ask someone to make dua for you when Allah can hear you All the time? Why ask prophet to intercede for you on the day of judgement when Allah is right there. It's just seeking means to attain the pleasure if Allah. People who make the same request after someone has died are mistaken but they are not committing Shirk.
@@ByChoiceMuslim
Ultimately, the whole point of our existence on Earth is to establish a direct one to one link to Allah. Allah did not make us primarily to establish a connection with him through others. Allah wants us to go back to Him, seek counsel and guidance to Him directly. Had it been to do it through others then perhaps one could say that we do not die in our graves alone (i.e. your soul is joined with someone else and you die together). It could also be that you inherit pain/sin/suffering from others and vice versa (i.e like the Christians who believe that Jesus died for their sins).
The point of having someone else make dua for you (note: he has to be alive), is so that Allah may grant that person's dua of making you better and get off on your legs on your own so that you events are set in motion that prompt you to attain Allah's mercy by yourself.
Think about it, can a dua of a Muslim to his/her dead non Muslim friend benefit them in the grave? No. If one dies as a kafir, it doesnt matter if 1000 of his muslim friends make dua for him. It will not be accepted and that kafir will definitely go to hell.
Another thing to note, is that the person who's doing it should be alive. Had it been ok to request help from a dead person, then there would be no use for the concept of Sadaqat Jariya (i.e. you performing acts on their behalf so that the hasanat goes to them and it increases their ranks).
The dead cannot help you, but you can help them.
So going to a grave and asking for help is basically like asking a toddler to jump and dunk a basketball. (I.e. you are asking the impossible: a baby cannot do that).
Likewise asking the dead to help you when a dead person cannot make dua. Unless you think that the dead person must have some divine status that gives them the ability to ask Allah for help. This is definitely shirk.
Again i ask you, how can a dead person benefit you? If anything you can benefit them.
I didn't start watching it,
Is this video supporting YQ and all his new modern western thoughts Or is it directing to YQ to change his statements etc.?
Directing to change his statements
@@yooshatarique019 jazakallahu khairun
I don't agree with your definition of Ibadah, when you group so many things together and include "acts of worship" which are only exclusive to Allah. Which actions are you talking about?
Sujood would be a prime example, but sujood can (possibly) be done to another being without it being Ibadah, for example in the previous Ummahs we had the Sajdah of Ta'zeem.
The action was the same, bowing or prostrating, but it was the intention and frame of mind which made the distinction.
Huh? He explained all that.
You're kidding me, he already explained it. Btw, sujood itself is no longer conditional. You admitted that the sujood of respect WAS a norm among the previous Ummahs. The Shariah of the Prophet SAW is clear that sujood has become an unconditional act of worship that is exclusively the right of Allah SWT. So it is irrelevant.
@@amirulafiq4371 You're missing the point. Sajdah was an act of worship since the time of Adam 'alayhisalaam, but what differentiated the sajdah of ta'dheem from 'ibaadah was the intention held by the person. Surely there's a difference between du'a and simply making a request. Du'a which constitutes clear-cut shirk is that which is done while associating lordship with the beseeched. There's no example of shirki type of du'a mentioned in the Qur'an or Sunnah that doesn't constitute this. Simply requesting something from an individual, whether dead or alive, is not shirk akbar.
I disagree with this practice, but this is the correct view.
@@hamadbakri2314
And I didn't negate that.
I said that sujood of respect is abrogated by the new shariah and it is NOW exclusively the right of Allah SWT REGARDLESS OF INTENTION
@@hamadbakri2314
Likewise du'a is an act of worship. Unlike sujood it has always been unconditionally reserved for Allah SWT.
No one's denying that the word du'a can be taken as meaning something else like calling or making requests to someone in normal everyday circumstances. I'm aware of the roots. The point is that the du'a that we usually make to Allah SWT is a different thing altogether.
It is blatant shirk when you believe that the entity/person you're calling hears, sees and knows every moment and every circumstance in the world. It is shirk when you're actually and literally calling unto this entity/person and expecting a response therefrom wherever you are. It is even shirk if you believe that this entity/person can have effects unto the world or can manipulate courses of events. This is the essence of idolatry. THESE ARE THE UNIQUE ATTRIBUTES OF ALLAH SWT.
Only HE SWT Is All-Hearing, All-Seeing and All-Knowing. Only He SWT Has Knowledge of the Unseen. Only He SWT Is Present for all needs.
This kind of du'a is reserved for worship. You're calling unto a Supreme Being Who Knows every moment, matter and condition in time and space and Who is INCOMPARABLE to others. It is worship bcuz you're expressing helplessness, dependance and servitude to One Who Is Capable and Present.
No one can hear, see or know the way Allah SWT Hears, Sees and Knows. This is why it is ridiculous to make supplications to others the same way it is ridiculous to make Salah to others. He SWT Is The Only True God. Only He SWT Has the Attributes. Only He SWT Deserves our prayers and supplications. After understanding these Unique Attributes, it makes sense why we call upon Him SWT wherever we are. Bcuz of this it makes perfect sense why this du'a is worship since it can only be directed at the One Who Has these Attributes in the first place and Can Answer/Fulfill our needs. Hence any act that is SUPPOSED TO BE directed to Allah SWT is rationally an act of worship. It is only Allah SWT Who Fulfills the rationale for this kind of du'a by virtue of His SWT Unique Attributes not shared by others. Pragmatically it is directed only to Him SWT and must be directed only to Him SWT. It is His SWT exclusive right the same way the Salah, which as explained is directed only to Him SWT, is His SWT exclusive right.
MAKING THIS KIND OF DU'A TO OTHER THAN ALLAH SWT IS BELIEVING THAT OTHERS HAVE A SHARE IN HIS SWT ATTRIBUTES NAUZUBILLAH AND THIS IS SHIRK AL-ASMA WAS-SIFAT AND CONSEQUENTLY SHIRK AL-ULUHIYAH.
However, when it comes to calling out the Prophets and the righteous Awliyaa, even in the second person, out of lament, passion and religious sentiment e.g. battle slogans or in imaginative writings such as poetry (note: even poetry must have its limits), there's nothing wrong with it. By this no one believes that he/she is directly calling unto the person or expecting any response. In fact the Qur'an is full of second person narratives and we recite it in our prayers. Even during the tahiyyat we say salams to the Prophet SAW in the second person. The point being, as long as you're not calling unto an entity LIKE calling unto Allah SWT regardless of the intention, you're not transgressing or sinning
Say whatever you want about ibn Abdul Wahhab rahimhu Allah. The fact is he really revived the matter of tawhīd when it had been forgotten by many scholars whether you like this fact or not.
He was amongst the few ones that knew tawheed?
@@rehanmir4560 Not only did he know tawhīd, but he also taught it and changed the miserable situation of the Ummah about tawhīd in that time.
By murdering muslims?
@@shafqatishan437 That's not true. And do not even dare to raise this card. You have to have a big picture of what happned in that time. How come that no one cries for what happned to villages and towns of Hijāz and Najd in Arabia by the sufi turkish army? Read what their historians such as Al-jabarti said about that. Read what they said about that Army, and how it was "islamic".
Shirk is not gonna return to Arabia Insha' Allah. No matter what. We will do our best and ehat ever it takes to prevent sufi egyption turkish shirki culture in Arabia.
He didn't leave the Athari creed, he only left najdi/salafi/wahabi movement. His aqeedah is still Athari-salafi and he explained it clearly in many of his videos including the ones this guy is trying to refute. Also he never said associating partners with Alllah isn't shirk. He said without the intention parying to graves isn't shirk but still haram, bidah and leads to shirk.
spot on. how can this guy say that he left the athari school? he said no such thing. if he has any principle, he should retract this erroneous comment
I stopped listening when I heard that blatant lie. You can refute without lying.
You must be deluded. Worship those who are dead ( righteous people) and worshipping Jesus (pbu) is no difference. Shirk is the biggest sin in Islam!
He said it’s only shirk if you ascribe independent powers to awliya which is same belief as Makkah mushriks and misinterpreted ayath of Quran to establish his deviant beliefs
Wait, won't Dr. Yasir Qadhi wholeheartedly agree with you? He said that when ppl perform istigatha, they believe that the ones in the grave can help them the same way people who are alive can help him. So the dead are alive in some sense. The actor of istigatha believes all power is from Allah, but the one being asked in the grave is a valid means, just as asking for help from an alive person is a valid means. Dr. Yasir Qadhi says this is absolutely, categorically haram because it opens the doors to shirk. Is this wrong? @@SweetyDonaldTrump.1
Yasir Qadhi clearly made distinction between the Najdi movement of modern day and the atharism before Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab. He only equated original movement (1st wave) of Najdi Dawah with Isis.
Watch the full video please then comment
It will be more beneficial inshallah
This speaker appears to show that the Atharism before Najdi dawah isn't that different in terms of understanding Ibadah.
He was not right in that as well.
Ibn Abdul Wahab did hijra to defend & spread Tawhid just like sunna Tawhid is linked to safety like in the gulf while shirk is linked to colonies of ashari sufis and shi'a. yq is ikwani, whose sayyed qutub is the face of iran's cia 79 revolt, the original jet bombers to be israelis ally, train al queda and lie on iraq wmds to form isil...
exact opposite, Saudis booted al queda & yasir's ikwanis linked to iran led to isil.
YQ is clearly wrong here and many other instances
May Allah have mercy upon Sheikh Ibn Taymiyya and Ibn Abdul Wahhab for clarifying the pure Islam
Yeah, YQ and every major scholar who came before Abdul Wahab are all wrong. Only Salafis discovered true Islam 1000 years after Islam came and went 😂
@@altafkalam2716 yh
If someone calls yajuj majuj zombies, hudood punishments as bizzare and scare tactics, collaboration with the filthy lgbtabcd- people and taking shirk lightly, yh they're bad
Please do take out Yasir Qadhi and Nouman Ali Khan from the cover photo.
If there is a benefit there is nothing wrong, misguided callers are to be rejected. I pray Allah guides them. Yasir Qadhi promotes shirk, civil wars and shi'a paganism directly! Khomeini said Ali's son has a new Qur'an and shi'a mehdi matches dajjal, think on that! NAK I know less of he has made big errors before too.
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 wowowo.... easy kid.
@@muhammadm4582 wow you called him a kid so cool. Try to defend ur priest yq next time maybe
@@jabba5716 OK, Karen.
@@muhammadm4582 lool
Excellent my brother we should be careful from taking everything from shaykh Yasir
Sometimes shaytaan can mislead anyone
Allah saves us
Or Shaytan could have misled Abdul wahab leading to death and destruction of so many muslims. Allah set knows better.
Please Sheikh, refrain from from naming and shaming people. Your Imaan is at stake. Rather tell the person that they are doing wrong. Tell them yourself. ALLAH forbids us from humiliating ANYONE. Learn from our beloved NABI (SAW).
Read the chapter in Saheeh Al-Bukhari about times when it is permissible to backbite. Allah's Messenger (sallallahu 'alaihi wa sallam) allowed backbiting in some cases. Backbiting is speaking the truth about someone which they wouldn't like. This is haram most of the times. But it is permissible in some cases for example you know of a murderer.
Now if you tell people of the murderer's sin, you are backbiting. But if you don't report him, he may kill more people. So in this case it is permissible (if not obligatory) to backbite.
Now imagine if someone makes a mistake (intentional or unintentional) in teaching something about the deen. It then becomes obligatory for those who know about the mistake to clarify it to the people so that people don't get the wrong idea.
As for the speaker in the video, Allah knows best.
Are Asharis and Maturidis considered innovators by Atharis?
Yes!
@@MohammedAlSharif2002 To the extent that they should be boycotted like for example a khariji. Like does their innovation take them to that extent. I'm literally asking a layman.
@@tanzimqurashi7292 don’t ask me, ask a scholar.
@@tanzimqurashi7292 no way. Khawarij are to be fought against while asharis are definitely not! Athari scholars still take the good from ashari scholars but only the scholars do this to differentiate the good from the bad. No doubt asharis are closer to ahlus sunnah than any other sect
@@AB-xx7hy jazakAllah khair. This clears a lot for me. May Allah guide us to the correct understanding of our wonderful Deen and forgive us for our inevitable shortcomings. Aameen.
Yasir Qadhi cannot be trusted anymore.
he has been lying for a while, his support for shi'a paganism and civil wars was also very bad too.
If Ibn Taymiyyah considered a person asking the dead to make dua fir them,while standing at their grave to not be major shirk, and Ibn Abdul wahab believed it was major shirk, Cinsidering Ibn Abdul wahab personality, that would have been a major disagreement btwn them! Ibn Abdul wahab it seemed believed in chain takfir! This could have been a potentially very contentious issue btwn the 2 if someone with that view of Ibn Taymiyyah lived in the land doing the time of ibn abdul wahab reign. So it is a bit disingenuous to say this wasn't a big deal or major difference between them! And he mentioned the Handball scholars position after or doing the time of Ibn Taymiyyah...What was the position of the Hanabilah before Ibn Taymiyyah?
The Hanabilah never really clearly mentioned abt asking the grave to make dua for you. Thinkingmuslim had a thing abt it on an article named Hanabilah on Istighatha or something like that. Probs the clearest is Shaykh Mari comments on it which was that it was not legislated.
@@abdullahalam4929Jazak'ALLAH khair... I agree with the Shaykh, saying it is not legislated.
@@cima5878 Wa Iyyakum and Barakallahu Feekum akhi
plz dont backbite
why do you need scholars interoperation of ibadah when the holy Quran and the sunnah of our prophet are very clear about it, indeed our prophet spent much more time teaching what Tawheed is than anything else he taught. then is it not total arrogance
to still look for scholar's interpretation
So you are also against studying fiqh and its different opinions and other islamic sciences from scholars because it is arrogance saying that the Prophet did not clarify how we should do our worship? It is merely for strenghtening the argument because saying shaykh Muhammad ibn Abdulwahhab was the first to come with this is a big false claim which people could believe while there were many scholars who shared the same islamic view that this (calling upon other than Allah) is shirk and not just a mistake
@@redman1300 The standards view of many of the ulemas around the globe are that invoking in it self is not shirk unless a person attributes Allah's power to that person. A person may invoke the dead in the sense of addressing, grieve, sadness, poetry. Even if he asks the dead to make dua for him - this is wrong but it does not constitutes Shirk according to many scholars because he believes the dead can hear him and he is not attributing Allah's power to him.
There is scholarly opinion that the dead can hear people who visit them by Allah's will. The proofs are:
The Hadith reported by al-Bukhari and Muslim that "The Prophet (SAW) told Muslims to greet the dwellers of graves and he said: 'Say: peace be upon you all, O inhabitants of the graves, among the believers and the Muslims. Verily we will, Allah willing, be united with you'" .
The scholars say: 'This address is to them, and we do not talk to people who can not hear' .
The Hadith reported by al-Bukhari and Muslim - where the Prophet (SAW) addressed the dead of disbelievers in the battle of Badr three days after their death: "When he halted at the edge of the well, he addressed the corpses of the Quraish infidels by their names and their fathers' names,
"O so-and-so, son of so-and-so and O so-and-so, son of so-and-so! Would it have pleased you if you had obeyed Allah and His Apostle? We have found true what our Lord promised us. Have you too found true what your Lord promised you? "
'Umar said, "O Allah's Apostle! You are speaking to bodies that have no souls!" Allah's Apostle said, "By Him in Whose Hand Muhammad's soul is, you do not hear, what I say better than they do".
When prophet (SAW) died - Abu Bakr came and uncovered the face of Allah's Messenger (ﷺ), kissed him and said,
"Let my mother and father be sacrificed for you, (O Allah's Messenger (ﷺ)), you are good in life and in death. Allah in Whose Hands my life is, Allah will never make you taste death twice. "
[Reported by al-Bukhari]
@@faysalahmed9157 tbh brother i don't really care about their opinion because the quran and hadith is full of obligation to call only on Allah and it's a major disrespect to Allah to not call upon him and even if it is "just" haram like zina is "just" haram these beliefs need to be intellectually refuted and the ignorant need to be taught that this is a major sin and shirk. In my opinion this is satans way of opening the door to idol worship because remember satan works in steps this is the first step to make you comfortable with calling upon other than Allah and the next day the ignorant muslims will start worshipping them more than Allah and then you tell them it's just a mistake see if they will listen to those who say it's not shirk then. There is completely no wisdom in those scholars opinion in shutting this doorway to shirk and that's why they are majorly lacking in calling the people away from this only salafis are doing their hardest to keep people away from this trap of shaytaan
Also i did not say talking to the dead near their grave is haram but nowhere in that hadith did the prophet or sahaba ask for help of the dead major difference there. Also the Prophet taught us that if we send salat and salam on him it will reach him and he will answer the salam back but never did he teach us to call onto him for help he even warned us of taking his grave as a place of worship so that shows how evil this practice is that goes against islam. Why would he warn us against taking his grave as a place of worship while we would never believe he is Allah? Because we would call upon him do tawaf around his grave touch it and kiss it like the kabah etc which are all forms of worship. The Prophet also said that we would follow the ways of the jews and the christians and we all know how the christians made Jesus into a God do you think that this came about in one day or that the devil made them call upon jesus step by step. Also if calling upon the prophets is not shirk then why do we not call upon jesus cause he's alive according to us muslims (like the christians do) while not believing he is God we would make fools of ourselves. Also saying it is just haram and then stating "evidence" for it being halal cause the dead can hear and other reasons is a contradiction it's either halal or haram and it's clearly haram my brother. Worship is clear and shirk is clear if this is not shirk than almost nothing is shirk this is also accusing Allah and his prophet of not making the most important matter which is the difference between worshipping Allah and worshipping idols clear. And it is not a matter of extermism that just "wahhabis" have many scholars from all the madhabs have written books about reasons one can leave islam like insulting the prophet and what punishments there are. Also brother you said they are not attributing powers to the sains while they are because asking the dead for help even if they hear is attributing to them powers that they can give you rizq or help you in difficulty while that is only for Allah and this is the same thing of those mushrikin which Allah mentioned in the Quran those who worshipped the jinn and they never believed the jinn were Allah and the jinn can hear them yet Allah gave this is an example in the quran of them being in sin and disbelief while they only sought help for protection from a living hearing creature so how would Allah accept the muslims now from doing the same with the saints and prophets. I'm just going on a rant here brother not everyhting i said is meant for you
How is Bassem conflating Atharis with modern salafis? 😂😆😆
Psuedo-Salafis bro
0:23 he hasn’t really left the Athari school as he still identifies as an Athari, rather he has left aspects of the Salafi movement.
He said that he "moved beyond Athari creed" despite still "being sympathetic to it" So it doesn't seem like he's still formally a part of it, despite still agreeing with chunks of it.
@@aymanodat491
I remember seeing him in a video lately calling himself an Athari.
Allah knows best. I guess it also depends what we mean by "Athari". If by it, we mean "Salafi" then clearly Sheik Yasir does not agree with Athari position on Ibadah
@@aymanodat491 he made a distinction between atharism and the Najdi movement of MIAW. He said he disagrees with 5 to 10% of what he thought when he was part of the Najdi movement.
@@ByChoiceMuslim I think this speaker is equating Atharism with Salafism then.
I know you tried . But you still failed to counter his point . Ibn tymiyyah etc comes later show proof from Quran .
Watch shaykh dimashqia he has a long response with proof from quran and sunnah
Your response is unclear. You skirted over a lot of issues and at the end of the video you got emotional and lost all objectivity. Disappointing.
For instance?
According to wahabi definition of dua, ibadah, we will have to make takfir of great ulemas who lived in the past.
Yassir qadhi suffers from lack of intellectual bravery. So he tries to appease . Sometimes he uses ambiguous terms to avoid talking about 'contravertial ' issues.
This is basically the satan tactics, may Allah guide him and his followers too it’s best dua I can make for someone
Very eye opening. Thank you
I remember you from Twitter.
You're that wierdo orientalist that asked me about the different schools of aqeedah
😂
You are so pathetic! Why don't you mind your own business? You worship a human being because of a corrupted book and because of corrupted political theological councils, so do not you think it is time to search for the truth instead of polemics?
@@Khaledf ppl are jelous.
This guy is an orientalist that is so interested in Islam, so creepy.
@@MohammedAlSharif2002 ignore as long as we know the type of ignorant orientalism its ok, nothing new, Islam will be superior
Sorry for your video. I have benefited so much from Shaykh Qadhi. Alhamdulillah I love our prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), his wives and his companions because I listened to shaykh Qadhi lectures. Alhamdulillah. Wa’Alaikumu Salam
Masha' Allah, you love to learn about Islam and you LOVE to learn about Islam :)
And I was like you, I used to love Yasir Qadhi because he explains in an easy way, and he put alot of details when he makes a lecture. But when I was told that he said this and this, he says ALOT of false stuff when he is talking about something. And he is not trustworthy anymore
I started to defend him "I know him for a long time, why would he lie", anybody can be a liar!
But now Allah opened my eyes, Yasir Qadhi is not to be followed anymore.
I dont want my faith to be corrupted because of him, so I try to be safe and not listen to him.
Look for trustworthy Islamic teachers, research about them.
If you want to be safe then listen to the real shuyukh like Ibn U'theymeen(r.a), Salih Al-Fawzan (h.a), Al-Albani (r.a), Ibn Baz (r.a)
May Allah protect us and make us follow the Quran and the authentic ahadiths of Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w) ameen
YQ's comment is blown out of proportion!!
Well he left their saved sect and speaks out against it sometimes. So I understand their resentments towards him. Some of these people are acting like he left Islam. YQ just simply hold some views that were held by majority of the scholars of Islam which is considered misguidance by the Najdi movement, that's all.
@@ByChoiceMuslim it simply signifies the fact that he has left the athari school of aqeedah.
It's not something us atharis will take lying down.
@@ByChoiceMuslim imagine Hamza Yusuf suddenly claiming ithbaat of all sifat dhatiyah and opposing and critiquing imams of ashari aqeeqah like Al Ghazali or fakhr Al din Al Razi
Would Asharis just ignore it and act like nothing happened????
Nope, not this time. This time YQ really did lose track of basic concepts.
No, as the sheikh said, this is from the things that are known by necessity. YQ gave three opinions (again, conflating between schools of fiqh and schools of aqeedah), and he chose one that is basically not a majority opinion as he claims. He even gave a third opinion based on extreme sufis and the barelvis which is not an acceptable opinion. His paradigm in doing so is purely Western academic and not Muslim academic
54:00 I respect this talk but this is a straw man argument, YQ never said to fast, slaughter etc for Isa(as) but just the issue of asking help. Please be fair. And it was just a hypothetical situation. The main point is whether the asking of help will be shirk or not. Not regarding the miracles granted to Isa(as). The same can be done with Prophet(as), he(s) was given special powers of healing. Everyone agrees that no miracle by any Prophet is independent of Allah swt. I don't understand why you would make an issue out of that.
When was the Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w) given the power of healing from Allah? (give hadith plz)
I know only about Isa (a.s)
Masha' Allah, you love to learn about Islam and you LOVE to learn about Islam :)
And I was like you, I used to love Yasir Qadhi because he explains in an easy way, and he put alot of details when he makes a lecture. But when I was told that he said this and this, he says ALOT of false stuff when he is talking about something. And he is not trustworthy anymore
I started to defend him "I know him for a long time, why would he lie", anybody can be a liar!
But now Allah opened my eyes, Yasir Qadhi is not to be followed anymore.
I dont want my faith to be corrupted because of him, so I try to be safe and not listen to him.
Look for trustworthy Islamic teachers, research about them.
If you want to be safe then listen to the real shuyukh like Ibn U'theymeen(r.a), Salih Al-Fawzan (h.a), Al-Albani (r.a), Ibn Baz (r.a)
May Allah protect us and make us follow the Quran and the authentic ahadiths of Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w) ameen
The speaker did not say that Sheik Yasir said to worship Isa. Looks like you are committing a straw man argument.
@@nufailanoon
Two Healing Miracles in the battle of Khaybar
The authentic books of Hadith, and foremost Bukhari and Muslim, report that:
The Noble Prophet (pbuh) had appointed ‘Ali al-Haydari as standard-bearer during the Battle of Khaybar, but his eyes were aching severely due to illness. The moment the Noble Messenger applied his healing spittle to his eyes, they were cured, with no trace of the discomfort remaining. (4) The following morning, ‘Ali conquered the citadel of Khaybar by removing its extremely heavy gate and using it in his hand as a shield.
During the same battle, Salama b. al-Aqwa’s leg was struck and split open by a sword; God’s Messenger breathed onto it, and the leg was at once healed. (5)
The healing of blind eyes
Authorities on the Prophet’s life, and foremost Nasa’i, report from ‘Uthman b. Hunayf, who said:
“A blind man came to God’s Noble Messenger (PBUH) and said: ‘Pray so that my eyes may be healed and I may see!’ The Prophet said:
“Go and take the ablutions, then pray two rak‘ats, and say: O God! I beseech you and I turn to you, for the sake of the Prophet Muhammad, the Prophet of Mercy. O Muhammad! I turn to your Sustainer, for your sake and through you, asking that He uncover my sight. O God, make him my intercessor!” (6)
He went and did this, and when he returned, we saw that his eyes had opened and he could see very well. (7)
[4] Bukhari, Jihad 102, 144; Maghazi 38; Fada’il as-Sahaba 32, 34; al-Hakim, al-Mustadrak 3, 38.
[5] Bukhari, Maghazi 38 (from Yazid b. ‘Ubayd); Abu Dawud, Tibb 19; as-Sa’ati, al-Fath ar-Rabbani Sharh al-Musnad 22, 259.
[6]see Tirmidhi, Daawat: 118; Ibn Majah, Iqama: 189; Musnad: 4-138.
[7] Tirmidhi, Daawat: 119 (hadith no. 3578); al-Hakim, al-Mustadrak, 1:526; Bayhaqi, Dalailu’n-Nubuwwa: 6:166; Ibn Majah, Iqama, 189; Musnad, 4:138.
@@aymanodat491 that's true, I edited that, thanks.
he never said he left athari school tho. More like he left the mob mentality of the Najdi movement.
Response should be from a scholar of similar caliber or level or higher than that of yasir qadhi
Response from someone less is unreliable
Go and read about brother bassam. He's not just anybody.
He is anybody when compared to yasir
For someone to make shirk permissible - they must not understood the message of Islam. How low can you get?
@@SweetyDonaldTrump.1actually Dr. Yasir Qadhi never, ever made shirk permissible, so you're actually lying
Ibn Taymiyyah was top of sheikh ul-Excuse
Fear Allah do you even know who Ibn Taymiyya is? Eating the flesh of a dead major scholar Allah yahdik
Dont waste your time by watching. We need real certified scholars to explain this like dr haitham or Hatem Hajj or waleed basyouni ...
Shaykh Muhsin al Abbad al Badr , Shaykh Dr. Rabee bin Hadee Madkhalee
Shaykh Saalih Fawzan Al Fawzan ,Shaykh Abdul Azeez Aal e Shaikh
@@abdulwali76 May Allah grant you jannah! Im so happy that you mentioned them!
Do you even know who is Bassam Zawadi?
@@Evkayne Nope, never heard of the guy.
@@abdulwali76 they dont know english.
Need someone highly certified who can explain in english clearly
Brother, Islam is a very easy religion. There is no complications in Islam. Simple thing that what is applicable according to Quran and Sunnah, is need to be followed. If it is against then there is a problem.
Now if any one says from his own mouth that I’m a scholar then I don’t consider that the person a scholar. I have heard many time from Qazi’s saying he is a scholar.
Also, whatever you are saying is far more away from the understanding of a normal Muslims. Your knowledge will not benefit Muslims, but make them confuse. For us, what you telling us a Hebrew. Prophet Muhammad (sal Allahu alaihi wa sallam) presented Islam in a simple way, instead these complication things, please present in a simple and short way.
7:55 is a bad example. Also your conclusion would. Mean most bollywood 'muslim' actors actually commit shirk by acting as a hindu in a film.
In your example the person worshipping "kevin" obviously doesn't have the intention of worship. His internal is different to his external... You could say he is a hypocrite to 'kevin worship'
About his agreeing to worship kevin, ie his statements, that would require further clarification.
Why?
I think you are thinking that his salah may be directed towards Allah in his heart.No,he is directing his salah to kevin for getting money and not to get reward from Allah.Rather he knows that he is doing a sin.I don't think he would expect reward from Allah for this as long as he is normal.But he doesn't intend to worship kevin.This is the scenario.
Rules are not decided based on what it would entail.Why are you bothered about these people anyways?
you're only allowed to say words of shirk if compelled while holding iman inside... some acts when done intentionally are shirk, how is meat halal? by sacrificing to Allah alone, to do it for other then Allah is shirk in your actions or Allah's Godhood, to expect a response from another is extra shirk in Allah's Lordship.
Summary, Just as there is different types of Tawhid, same with Shirk!
Lord = Creators actions
God = One Served, or via creation's actions assigned for and by the Creator!
Also recall minor shirk is doing something for Allah initially and then showing off, so how can it not be shirk?
That's so true.
It was a faulty analogy in the video.
Kevin was being made an object to obtain wealth, not to make him a diety.
The person was being disingenuous and hypocritical.
@@EagleHD I am sure I covered your point when I said : "you're only allowed to say words of shirk if compelled while holding iman inside... (Quran 17)"
and when I said. Lord = Creators actions
, God = One Served, via assigned actions. Can you explain why he is wrong after these facts?
He left the Athari school? No, this is incorrect. He never said that he left the Athari school. He renounced the Najdi dawah but he never said he left Athari school.
The good thing he said he doesn't wish to make another video for ur replies
Did Zawadi even listen to what Qadhi said in his video? When did Qadhi say he left the Athari school? LOL.
He says it near the end when he claims he's a "post-athari taymiyyan" and no longer an "athari"
He admits it in Library chat 13 around the 46th minute. He admits it elsewhere according to other brothers.
@@aymanodat491 just checked out the video you referred to. YQ is speaking in specific relation to the Sifat controversy his video is on. He's also stated in other recent videos that he is Athari/Hanbali in creed. His statements need to be understood in light of each other and in the context they're being made in.
@@RasheedGonzales
Masha' Allah, you love to learn about Islam and you LOVE to learn about Islam :)
And I was like you, I used to love Yasir Qadhi because he explains in an easy way, and he put alot of details when he makes a lecture. But when I was told that he said this and this, he says ALOT of false stuff when he is talking about something. And he is not trustworthy anymore
I started to defend him "I know him for a long time, why would he lie", anybody can be a liar!
But now Allah opened my eyes, Yasir Qadhi is not to be followed anymore.
I dont want my faith to be corrupted because of him, so I try to be safe and not listen to him.
Look for trustworthy Islamic teachers, research about them.
If you want to be safe then listen to the real shuyukh like Ibn U'theymeen(r.a), Salih Al-Fawzan (h.a), Al-Albani (r.a), Ibn Baz (r.a)
May Allah protect us and make us follow the Quran and the authentic ahadiths of Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w) ameen
@@RasheedGonzales When taking his statements together, it's clear that he's left Atharism in a full sense. It's clear; he has several many statements according to brothers here. However, on certain topics like Sifat perhaps, he likely still holds the Athari creed. Regardless, to say that Sheik Yasir said he left Atharism is an accurate statement; he did say that. As for the confusion he has caused with his apparently contradictory statements cannot be blamed on the speaker in this video.
Nobody no Muslims when they pray Maghreb or any salah make their intention to Kevin instead of Allah. Even the grave worshipers don’t do their salah to Kevin or to their Sufi Peer. I think you’re giving a new spin to refute Yasir Qadhi.
Give your talk in a context more fitting to the discussions.
Please stop making weird comparisons just to win a refutation competition.
SA Bassam Zawadi, it seems as if you dont have a good grasp of what Yasir Qadhi said. First and foremost, he said right at the beginning, the mushiks of Quraysh were indeed Mushriques because they did 'worship' deities whom they did not believe to be Allah or the supreme God. So you got it wrong. Secondly, Yasir Qadhi would agree with you that, a certain kind of reverence that you explained, directed at other than Allah is indeed Shirk. Yasir Qadhi is not referring to such reverence and such objects of worship. Yasir Qashi did not blanketly use the 'actions are as per intentions' to claim that all acts of reverence are not ibadah if they do not have intentions behind it. You assumed this. In fact, he was specifically, referring to Istighata and most specifically to Istagha of the Prophet Muhammad. This is where the issue is. The non-athari's argue for Istaghata through prophet Muhammad to be of permissibility. Yasir Qadhi did not say it is permissible but Haram. The 'others' say istaghata to be permissible because they advance certain evidence to claim that the prophet is first - alive in the barzak, and that God himself has given him the ability to benefit the ummah, such as answering dua through intercession from Allah. Only based on this premise that most scholars say Istighata to be out of shirkh and as per Yasir Qadhi only tantamount to bid'a that is haram. Everyone knows Ibn Taymiyyah did not approve istighata however allowed wasilah. However, unlike Ibn Taymiyyah, Abdul Wahhab did takfir and that is the issue. Besides, a mushrik cannot be killed in Islam, ibn Taymiyyah did not support this. The mushriks of the kuraysh were killed not because they are mushriks or due to their shirk, it is due to their treason. The address 'mushrik' in the Quran for the Quraysh is exactly that, 'an address, the order to fight them was due to their treason and sedition.
Yasar Qadhi is very helpful for us, however, we do not no who are YOU.....
So much stuff on Abdul wahab so disturbing the killing of Muslims in huge numbers.. so many disagree with him from other scholars, Yasir qadhi only pointing out what others already saying. This group partisanship is why so many videos.. amongst the salafi, the gov lot they would never be this harsh towards the Saudi leadership, i wonder why? They do the greatest of zoolum, look at Yemen, where r you tubers on this holding the Saudi to account it’s non existent.
That is not our main problem with YQ.
Watch the video
Seems like this topic is beyond your scope as you’ve confessed & quite obviously.
Stick to your lane
Myth experts and myth scholars, soo funny, feel sorry for them that they wasted their only one life on myths, Watched 42 minutes
As someone who consider Sh Yasir Qadhi to be among my most beloved and respected of teachers I watched this video even though I'm so disappointed that a channel as prominent as Digital Mimbar is using their platform to do "refutations" of a scholar that the entire community of Muslims love and respect....
I've never seen anyone criticize the Shaykh **except** that they had to read-in false meanings into what he once said and I saw that here again, unfortunately. Although I say this, my disagreement with the brother in the video is simply an intellectual one (no matter how strong it may be), and I still love him and I do appreciate the true things he said in the video and I hope for his success in deen and dunya as my Muslim brother.
It may be the case that someone is sincere but they are not correct. I love and appreciate all of my brothers who are sincerely trying to help the Ummah, may Allah bless you all, and I believe you are trying to help the community from confusions and misguidance. But to be very blunt the effect has been the opposite. Such content is not for the public and lay Muslims to dabble in, and it just causes division and confusion in the community. High-level issues should be discussed among the scholars/academics, in the right place, at the right time. To not realize this is very dangerous. Indeed, how many generations of Muslim youth have distracted themselves with refutations and disagreements towards another Muslim? May Allah guide us all, Ameen.
Masha' Allah, you love to learn about Islam and you LOVE to learn about Islam :)
And I was like you, I used to love Yasir Qadhi because he explains in an easy way, and he put alot of details when he makes a lecture. But when I was told that he said this and this, he says ALOT of false stuff when he is talking about something. And he is not trustworthy anymore
I started to defend him "I know him for a long time, why would he lie", anybody can be a liar!
But now Allah opened my eyes, Yasir Qadhi is not to be followed anymore.
I dont want my faith to be corrupted because of him, so I try to be safe and not listen to him.
Look for trustworthy Islamic teachers, research about them.
If you want to be safe then listen to the real shuyukh like Ibn U'theymeen(r.a), Salih Al-Fawzan (h.a), Al-Albani (r.a), Ibn Baz (r.a)
May Allah protect us and make us follow the Quran and the authentic ahadiths of Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w) ameen
@@nufailanoon may Allah bless you for your advice, if you have an intellectual disagreement then that is your right
You are correct brother. Unfortunately, Sheik Yasir should not have started this and provoked a response.
Man educate yourself and don't confine the knowledge in cage, ibn whab is a respected scholar but not even close to lmam shafi,hanbal,malik and abu hanifa.
?
I do not know why we need to be so dogmatic about the subject of Shirk. In my humble opinion, it is really not possible to commit shirk against God almighty. From the Islamic perspective, piety can be in various form. It is harmless - even for a Muslim - to pay homage to a saint (waliAllaah) who has departed from this earth without really worshipping him. We must not be afraid to revere or respect our pious predecessors who are not ordinary people like us. It does not mean that we are guilty of worshipping that particular saint or guilty of committing shirk. Allaah accepts the piety of a human being no matter who, otherwise He would only accept the Muslims prayer and reject the non-Muslims. Praising or showing reverence to a wali (saint) is not worshipping him. There is an anecdote about Musa (a.s.) who scolded a shepherd for calling upon his 'God' with human qualities...Allaah revealed to Musa that He has separated His servant from him as he happened to be an ordinary person who believed his God as a huge figure sitting in a huge chair and has been calling God for many years in that same manner without any knowledge about the attributes of God. In poetry, there is a term known as 'poetic license'. It is allowed to praise someone without really considering him to be a GOD. Wahhabism and wahhabi doctrine are dangerously evil. It is actually a cult. Yasir Qadhi is absolutely right.
Did you just say it's not possible to commit shirk?
You need to see a doctor asap
Ps. Yasir still disagrees with you cause he believes it's haram
Why are you people so obsessed with glorifying the dead? You hearts are corrupted.
@@aymanodat491 It is a matter of understanding and how one interprets the statement 'glorifying the dead'. People, including some so-called scholars, especially that so-called salafi-wahhabi-deobandi are indoctrinated by the teachings that everything is 'shirk'. One can win an argument or debate only if the judge is convinced of who performed well in his opinion, and not on the basis of a convincing argument. Please read widely before condemning or disagreeing. Do not come to a conclusion fast. Everything can be easily proven if we have an open mind. A closed mind and narrow thinking are always dangerous. I am against dogmatism. You can not dismiss the contribution of great scholars like Imaam al-Ghazaali, Imaam Nawawi and all those they had followed. You cannot knock down the main pillars of a building and believe that the building will be strong. Everything is possible in today's world. CZcams speakers are not real scholars. All heresays cannot be accepted as the truth. In Surah Yunus of the Glorious Qur'an, you can read a verse to the effect that 'conjectures and opinions cannot be the truth'. Likewise, opinions and speculations, cannot replace the truth.
@@Jaffar540 In other words, people who don't agree with you and your preferred scholars "need to read more." Okay whatever.
Let us all become christians, jews and atheist and polytheists then if it is not possible to commit shirk, because from what you are saying it's not much different that why Imam Ibn Taymiyya extensively refuted alBakri. Why would i pray and hold on to the strict sharia of islam if the christian also gets to enter heaven. You are the cult because you have changed the simple islam the Prophet Muhammad (s) came with worship Allah la ilaha illalah ask him alone pray to him alone all things taught by oir Prophet
The whole Wahabis revolve around defending Ibn Taymiyyah and Ibn Abdul Wahab Najdi !! :(
Why are sufis so hellbent on supplicating and asking for help from other than Allah? Is it that difficult to trust Allah to take care of all of your affairs? Is it that difficult to believe that Allah is in control of everything in the heavens and the earth and at the same will respond to you when you supplicate to him? Why ask a dead person for help, when you are in direct contact with Allah through your acts of worship and can ask him directly for help in what causes you distress? Why ask a dead person, when he himself cannot do anything to save himself from getting punished in the grave?
You wouldn't have written this if you actually saw the video
Haha !! Unfortunately, you are wasting your life defending a cult that has nothing to do with Islam and religion. Most of argument put forward by Najdis are so childish in nature that I don't even consider worth responding. I ask to ALLAH by the intercession of his beloved Prophet Muhammad (SAW). So do you think that prophets are getting punished in the grave? I wont be surprise if you think like this.
@@syednajeebashraf4101 your strawman arguments won't work. Why do you need to call on anyone besides Allah, when he is the All-Hearing and All-Seeing God? You have a DIRECT connection to God. Is God not enough for you people that you need to go to the prophets and other righteous people and supplicate to them? Doesn't everything in the heavens and the earth belong to him? Is Allah really not enough for you?
@@syednajeebashraf4101 why don't you ask Allah directly? What's wrong with that ?
Bassam Zawadi, you did indeed got most things wrong, even though you are convinced of your own analysis. 1. Yasir Qadhi did not say "innama al-a'malu bi-l-niyat" can be applied to judge all aspects of acts of worship. He was specifically referring to Istighata and that was the context. It was understood that the formula was used only in the case of istighata. 2. He didn't say that Istighata to be Haram as a Hanbali position. All he said that it is the position of Ibn Taymiyyah. 3. Shirk and Mushrik do not tantamount to takfir in Hanbali madhab or any madhab for that matter. it is not the opinion of Ibn Taymiyyah either. It is the idea of Ibn Abdul Wahhab in this context. 4. Ibn Taymiyyah is NOT considered by the Hanbalis or others to be a major Hanbali scholar, representative of the hanbali madhab, he was always a loner (even though great). 5. Occasionalism is agreeable to many laymen. In fact, the foundation of occasionalism is accepted by all Muslims including the atharis, it is in nuances of the secondary causees and effects where there is the difference of opinion. Occasionalism in its fundamentals is agreed by at least 90% of Muslims who are not atharis. Asharis do not use occasionalism to justify istighata, you speculated this argument or misattributed this to Asharis. 6. Bassam, we do not consider you to be an expert in any aspect of Islam, nor are you qualified to contend with dr Yasir Qadhi, whether he is right or wrong. First of all, according to RISSC, 90% of Muslims are traditional Muslims and Salafis are 8%. The Ummah is not Salafi. 7. The state does not have the power to enforce acts of ibadah or forcefully eradicate shirk, the latter is the opinion of Ibn Abdul Wahhab and not the opinion of the jamatul ulama and the majority of Muslims. 8. Yasir Qadhi's opinion is not of the minority in its methodology. It falls under the methodological trajectory of the jamaar al-ulama and the majority of Muslims in their methodology. If it is a minority opinion as you claim it is, then it is the opinion of Ibn Taymiyyah as well. Ibn Abdul Wahhab and your opinion are of the minority of 8% as well. Ibn Taymiyyah's opinions are also of the minority mind you. 9. We support Yasir Qadhi and his opinion as istighata to be haram aligned to be with the opinion of Ibn Taymiyyah. Whether we agree or disagree with Yasir Qadhi's opinion independently, we must acknowledge that his opinion is valid, grounded by al-adillah al-qat'iyyah and al-adillah al-zanniyyah, as all most all of Ibn Abdul Wahhab and your arguments are based on al-adillah al-zanniyyah. Your assessment is no match in calibre and content compared to the (whether one likes him or not) the calibre of the learned scholar Yasir Qadhi. Even if you and I reject his assessment, that is all we can do, his assessment is of credible ijtihad that will be accepted by Allah and rewarded whether he is ultimately right or wrong. However, as for Abdul Wahhab the possibility is even more skim than his!
What a disgrace your attack on Dr. Qadhi. You choose a very evil way to discredit him in the end of the video. What an evil way. May Allah guide and forgive you
True atharis follow its true form from the salaf. Not najdi or ibn taymiya they are free from them
Ok, so who should we follow in Aqeedah?
Simple Imam ahmad ibn hanbal he's a true salaf
@@musha3462 is Kitab Al sunnah by Abdullah Ibn Ahmad RA good enough for you?
It is literally the main book of aqeedah for salafis
Aqeedah tahawiyah is very beneficial which has zero critics and is from an early period and he attributes this book to his teachers who were great imams of fiqh and aqeeda .. He was from the salaf
@@musha3462 yes, we do study tahawiyyah
It's one of our core texts
What's wrong with Kitab ul Sunnah?
Boring
You haven't even finished it yet
It's not for entertainment.
It is Islamic, why would u say it is boring
Actually boring, manipulative and of back biting nature.
@@mademan4life Proof?