"What we have here is a potential space drive," Laithwaite said. "Properly developed, this would take you to the outer universe on a spoonful of uranium."
One of my strongest memories as a teenager was seeing this exact machine demonstrated on the old Nation Wide show, and I have been obsessed with toying with similar ideas involving the hidden forces of gyroscopes ever since. I can't believe I have found this again after so many decades. Thank you for posting!
E=MC2 is a joke! OK let's get this correct !! #1 The only reason radio waves and AC current travel out in space and down a wire is because of the "CENTER " of a magnetic field. (The "B" field), The North and South poles are the weakest part of a magnet !! Just like Tesla said, you got to look at things you can't see !! At the center of a magnet is anti gravity, (just tap the center on any glass or plastic and it will loose weight), The center can repel water if vibrated at the correct frequency, If you vibrate the "B" field into granite rock it will become soft and you would need copper tools to work on same , you don't want to disrupt the magnetic (B")field ) with other iron. Once you understand the "B" field of a magnet and how it relates to the entire universe we live in, you will then understand what Tesla was telling everyone "LOOK FOR WHAT YOU CANNOT SEE"" .I believe the pyramids were inter galactic communications and transportation systems. Stone Henge and Gobekli Tepe , power plants. Take a look at Coral Castle Florida on CZcams and you will see a similar pilar. I believe these horizontal pillars were oscillators that would provide excitation for many things from crops in the field to anti gravity FYI: If a UFO fly's to close to you the "B" field that provides the anti gravity ("B")Field). will cancel out your power source !!!! E=MC2 is at best just a joke!!!
I like the polite professor, he knows perfectly well the machine will never work but doesn't spoil it for him and encourages him to try to improve the machine until he realizes too...
E=MC2 is a joke! OK let's get this correct !! #1 The only reason radio waves and AC current travel out in space and down a wire is because of the "CENTER " of a magnetic field. (The "B" field), The North and South poles are the weakest part of a magnet !! Just like Tesla said, you got to look at things you can't see !! At the center of a magnet is anti gravity, (just tap the center on any glass or plastic and it will loose weight), The center can repel water if vibrated at the correct frequency, If you vibrate the "B" field into granite rock it will become soft and you would need copper tools to work on same , you don't want to disrupt the magnetic (B")field ) with other iron. Once you understand the "B" field of a magnet and how it relates to the entire universe we live in, you will then understand what Tesla was telling everyone "LOOK FOR WHAT YOU CANNOT SEE"" .I believe the pyramids were inter galactic communications and transportation systems. Stone Henge and Gobekli Tepe , power plants. Take a look at Coral Castle Florida on CZcams and you will see a similar pilar. I believe these horizontal pillars were oscillators that would provide excitation for many things from crops in the field to anti gravity FYI: If a UFO fly's to close to you the "B" field that provides the anti gravity ("B")Field). will cancel out your power source !!!! E=MC2 is at best just a joke!!!
for most part of my life from age 5 to age 29 I been working alone on my designs until I got into college and my inventing process changed. For those inventors who keep pushing boundaries in the garage a gentle advice, a textbook or two of reading and thorough analysis will save a lot of time, money and anguish later on.
@@ishkibable The guy that spent 24 years living off his parents and inventing things in their garage is ambiguous, vague and provides few details. *Surprised face*
The problem with your advice is that almost everything you learn in your text books is either completely wrong or it teaches you limitations based on our currently accepted physics. People like Sandy dont need text books they would actually hinder his ingenuity. People like Sandy are directed by unseen forces on himself. In summary, your advice for especially gifted people is BULLOCKS!
@@suckOnThese3 you can use the books as stepping stones they usually have the fundamentals which are really important when putting the pieces of a puzzle together
Hahaha had to much time in prison well he just said fuck it ill go buy an Orange jumpsuit and lets see if i can get my mojo back tada!! Tesla would be like finally someone that doesn't give a fuck what they think about him!! I think he's got a good plug that bings him some uncut breaking bad juice! Keep up the tweekkng ya killin it
Sir, I am now an old man and I have spent most of my life at similar pursuits. Nothing else mattered. I ate, slept and breathed the research of a particular device. Then came a point where I was just about broken and alone which forced me to peruse more lucrative endeavors. God bless you brother. Thank you for sharing. Sometimes inventing can be very lonely, not many people understand. Been there, done that. I wish you all the luck in the universe.
If 1 man in his garage can make this with no money over 4 years, imagine what an unlimited black project budget and a team of top scientific minds can do.
But that team should be creative just like him. Having knowledge is different from having curiosity and idea For such things we need to think out of the box. The right thought should strike our mind just at the right moment.
And people wonder where UFOs USOs. originate brom. Isn't it obvious? WE made them. they're OURS. now...let that sink in. ready? Okay now ask this question. why? just why? think about all of the secrecy in private agencies. alien abductions. attle mutilations. YOUR OWN YOUR PEOPLE ARE ***KING WITH YOU! your just sheep. now. ack to sleep little sheeple. this is all a ream >:)
Other Half to enslave us to oil and basic electricity we could of left to other planets, maybe we have, maybe there is slavery on mars, while there is a genocide on the Middle East. Who knows how far this thing goes and where it leads
hahahah - thats funny. I used to live a few doors down from Sean in London. One day I went out in a Tux and he passed me in the street in a scruffy tracksuit. Sort of irony.
This is one of those back burner projects I never started, there was a similar design posted in a scientific journal back in the early 70's which looked like a finished product and quite different in that it was self contained.
Although he was heading down the wrong path you have to admire his persistence. He wasn't doing a Stan Meyer on it. He genuinely thought he was on to something.
I ran a large hand held polishing machine for years at work.. The machine had a 12inch round wool pad on it. The pad was shaped like an upside down frisbee or deep dinner plate. it's edges curved upwards towards the machine itself. It was easy to feel the weight changed when the pad was rotating, as opposed to being stationary. The very strange aspect was that when the pad was held close to any surface, the entire machine would gain noticeable weight in you hand. Then become lighter as it was moved away from the surface. I have never heard of surface proximity changing gyro effect.
@@rodneyharris9681 It's funny how Star Trek, sexualized the poor Enterprises ship. She has been mangled by different species, space wars, planetary gravity, time travel chasing the Borg, and it's own internal warp-drive, which acts like a giant dildo, ripping her inner coil and preventing her from taking any more. I always thought that the Captain got off on this. Lol
Mr Kidd, thank you for your dedication and your gracious answers to the 'trolls'. Your work, your book and appearing on TV at the time got me to try making one as well. Which I did, and didn't comprehend the results until many years later. My system simply had two gyros, spinning in the same direction which because they were opposite each other appeared to have a contrarotation, and once they were spun up were then forced into precession. When placed on a scale and horizontal forced precession started, there was a fair bit of vibration effecting the needle on the scale. However, the needle oscillated at a weight less than normal. As maximum precessional velocity was reached the needle oscillated around the normal weight. As forced precession was ceased and the precession velocity slowed, the needle oscillated at a weight greater than normal and in the same range as at startup. Many years later I considered that the result was a matter of;' For every action, there is an equal reaction - but not necessarily at the same time'. In other words, the system stored a reaction, resulting in initial weight loss and as precession slowed the stored reaction then occurred, resulting in increased weight equal to the weight loss. If I had rotated the whole device through 180 degrees ( balanced by another pair of gyros) during the stored phase before reducing precession velocity then the two outputs would have occurred in the same direction. The result would then be a pulse of output acceleration upwards, followed by a pause, then another pulse in the same direction - an average acceleration in the one direction. Rather than an average velocity... For every angular velocity (ie; precessional) there must be an angular acceleration (however small). For every angular acceleration there must be a momentary angular jerk. For every jerk, a snap. For every snap, a crackle and then onwards in the same vein a pop. We want angular acceleration so require angular jerk. I think this explains (angular jerk) why your own machine at least displayed output velocity and why the university version of your machine (machined to extremely fine tolerances which minimised any 'jerky' vibration) showed far less of an effect, if any. 'Jerk' is something that is an engineering nuisance - but for these devices is vital. How to engineer maximum jerk so that output force is created? No wonder, in the minimising of jerk in any machine by engineers, no one has noticed that reaction can be stored. That's what you did, in my opinion. When you turned so quickly on removing the aircraft gyro you induced a large jerk - sufficient to throw you UP and backwards off your feet. If you had turned with a near zero jerk you would have just toppled over backwards, feet still on the ground. More to come at some other time - I'm 60 and my tea is ready!
6:25 Prof. Laithwaite could have performed a very easy test by simply standing on a scale with the disk spinning and not spinning. There is no difference in weight. He just did not understand the physics of a gyroscope which are admittedly not quite simple.
@TQ jokes on you buddy, the Flux capacitor was a hoax! Besides, everyone knows you need a minimum of 4 food processors eating a full bundle of banana peels EACH to reach anywhere near 1.21 gigawatts!
It happens to me too a lot of people when you become obsessed with something and you get so close to it from what you've imagined and put on paper and then when it comes to life it just becomes an obsession. And it is men and women like this who have changed our world look at Einstein he couldn't hold a relationship to save his life because they're obsessed the people who invented jet engines the internal combustion engine and so on these are all obsessions at one point now it's just a reality we take for granted
Hello Phil violin maker! Retired professional violinist/violist here. I think you just might be right! Truly mind boggling isn't it? I feel sorry for his poor wife. She's a widow/divorcee without a death or court ruling to show for it. If she's still alive these forty years on, she'll be left a friendless pauper if he predeceases her. It's pretty evident at this point that it all came to naught.
Your pretty close gyroscope, the gyroscope uses a fulcrum and the arm of the gyroscope once spun presents lift. So imagine a wheel with in a wheel or more once spun presents lift as with the demonstration with the barbell. Once the barbell disc spun and the man becomes the fulcrum the barbell disc became weightless. A wheel with in a wheel activated by an engine creates anti gravity. Except the multi giro mechanism is much larger big time.
@@jojolafrite90 I pray to God Almighty that He reveals the secrets of flight and anti gravity, to His/God's Elect One's. I pray He saves that adventure for us, away from you hypocritical mockers. This govt sold itself out to fallen entities for the Knowles that we could of gotten for free from God. Obviously the helical pattern, is a pattern of the universe. And we can capture free energy if we work with nature instead of against it. And I pray that He casts down the fallen angels and their human followers and deceivers. Those in high places censoring and eliminating men who come across too much knowledge. I know they've found much more efficient ways to create flying craft using gyroscope effect and/or mercury vortex propulsion engines. The US govt has certainly studied the crap out of this and left us all in the dark. May God give us the victory, through our trials and tribulations. Not you nay saying mocking hypocrites who do nothing but attack a man's hopes and dreams. When all you are is a shadow. A shade of a man
@@Chompchompyerded o my goodness. The man is working out of his house... garage. His family still had access to him. His wife found a fake social life more important than discovering anti gravity. Which is exactly what he is cracking into. Women have made this whole life into a fake materialistic splurge to beautify themselves and compete with others over God's natural gifts and have the audacity to criticize a man seeking street greatness. Bet if he created anti gravity tech and became the world's richest man. You and almost every other woman would divorce their husband to get a piece of that pie. This world is PURE hypocrisy
This is my 3ed time watching this and it still amazes me. We r all into something we r driven to. U should be proud of yourself and your wife is someone very special.
Mines would tell me I worthless when I was going thru tough financial time, made me feel like utter garbage. I picked myself up and moved on. Glad there good women who supports their husband
It’s really sad that people like this trick themselves into thinking they have some thing when they don’t. He even tricked his family and wasted his entire life for nothing.
I get your point but it's not wasted if he had fun and the illusion of working on a breakthrough project elevated his subjective life quality to a higher level.
Very sad to see someone so blind to the spirit of exploration and discovery. We don't find anything new by doing things we already know work. What you're advocating for is stasis.
The guy could’ve saved 10 years of his life by just putting a propeller on the model airplane engine and would’ve generated more lift then his entire machine in less than five minutes
What a great woman, and he gave it a fair shot, more power to him for trying! You can't screw up if you never try anything, but you'll never make anything good neither..
Giros do NOT create lift nor do they run continuously without an external energy force. BTW, this mechanism has some similarities to the governors used to control the speed of steam engines. Except static weights were used instead of rotating ones but nevertheless, produce the same effect.
@@Aluttuh True, but it raises the question - Even if this gyro can generate lift, you then have to factor in the weight of the power source and motors to run the whole thing.
@@chrisantoniou4366 i think thats the basis of the question, how much lift it could generate from various forms of power. just imagine how fast you could get something spinning, (larger the mass the stronger the momentum, less power needed to keep it spinning... maybe its all about RPM??) with a more advanced power source? i bet there is an equation for the RPM needed to cancel out weight... although a part of me thinks it might only be generating lift by climbing up the pole from centrifugal force. its official guys, i figured it out... UFOs are powered by fission gyros of great mass.
Not if he was basing his calculations on Einstein's restrictive laws, which obviously one day will be broken or surpassed by better laws and theories, as have those of other famous scientists. What would have helped is having access to the antigravity and flying machine patents designed by Nikolai Tesla, but the majority of those are still locked away. Modern science is held back by those too scared to disagree with Einstein and also by greed, as all the ingenious and new inventions are bought and paid for by the wealthy oil and electric companies, to prevent them being manufactured and ruining their profits.
of COURSE you have a Punisher avatar 😂 dude can't get laid and he blames it's the way women are today and not the bald acorn he's got between his legs gtfoohwts 😂
Looking at his wife, I can understand why he locked himself away in his garage. But he could have come up with a better excuse than building a flying saucer!
I have always believed there’s a way to manipulate gravity with magnets. Maybe if you have an enclosure with all the same polarities pushing against each other.
Magnet fields are just electric fields seen in a moving frame of reference, lots of youtube videos on it of physics PhDs. If you can't manipulate gravity with electric fields, you can't do it with magnetic fields.
Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say.
Many years I spent building my very own anti-gravity machine. Experiment after experiment. Failed test after test and then finally, I had it; my very own Anti-Gravity device. After the initial launch, all my notes on board, it all went wrong. It worked for sure, but the last I saw of it, it was flying past Pluto.
I spent as much time in my shop as I could. I also mowed the grass every day. Even with snow on the ground. I couldn't hear the fish monger even when she was six inches away. I say this man is crazy like a fox.. Well done
One of the greatest Rube Goldberg machine's ever made. "I did all this while working with only a very basic grasp of mathematics and physics". Should have put that quote at the beginning of the video. He's got some good mechanical ingenuity, but definitely no understanding of physics.
I see the flaw in this right from the start. There is a horizontal force applied to the vertical axel which makes it appear to freely travel upwards. If the gyro was freestanding it would topple over or it would need the same force applied horizontally to stop this from toppling over. Gyros are great mass distributors but they don't decease total mass
This needs to be remade with our fancy new space age materials. I saw a guy that made a carbon graphene epoxy polimer that increased the strength of epoxy resin by 700%. Super strong, super light materials.
Sandy, you thought, for some reason beyond me, that by tilting the gyros that would tilt the centrifugal acceleration vector, along with the angular momentum vector of the gyros. You had me doing it for a minute or two ! But why would a rotating masse's centrifugal acceleration be any different to a non-spinning one ? It will still be perpendicular to the axis of the centrifugal rotation. Won't it ??! !? i.e. no component in the same direction as the axis of rotation. All the spinning gyros on its rod does, while it precesses, is provide a torque, M x length of rod. This effectively shifts the C of G to the handle end of the rod.
I wonder if there's a way to combine other motion methods with the Antigravity effects of the gyros to stabilize or go in a certain direction, but with much less effort and higher speeds. And doing testing remotely as with personal Drones.
3 disk left right and to left and right need to be connected to the upper one all 3 at same speed produces antigravity they will rotate on their selfs and rotate around itself ufos are not real they just created them and letting people think there are aliens instead od showing the technology they use
@@gencorp1659Since it's Scrooge McDuck narrating, and he used to be a cowboy, he might've smuggled in one of his cowpoke buddies back to the ol' country
Love this guy so much ambition and peace in him.. amazing wife loyal respectful and so accepting.. The women of today.. would have this guy done for domestic abuse..
Considering when this was recorded you should know that she had no other option than to accept it. Back then we could not let a flat, get a credit card, or open a checking or savings account, or buy a house without a man's signature. We also made only a fraction of the amount that men made for exactly the same work, and in addition we were limited to what kinds of work we could do. Most worst jobs were considered women's work. We are much better off now because if we did get stuck with a guy who decided to go lost pilot on us we can get out of the marriage, get good jobs (still paid a bit less than the boys), open financial accounts and live a fairly normal life afterward. It's a different world now than it was then.
Dude that’s exactly when I stopped and watched again. I just want to know if that was his idea or if he was influenced by something we’re unaware of...
@@named161 Given that NASA, Boeing and other US aerospace companies have pursued crackpot antigravity ideas, the American public should worry that the people at Area 51 might actually be as stupid as Kidd. After all, the CIA wasted millions on trying to develop 'death-stares', telepathy and remote-viewing, so all bets are off when the common-sense of US organisations is at issue. Perhaps their CEOs spend too much time on watching CZcams rubbish.
Is was at that moment i knew he didnt know what he was talking about, sadly, when he tilt shift the model saucer 90% he just wasted plenty of angular momentum. Hes a TINKERER.
Just a gem of a documentary. Makes you wonder if this and mercury combined with the correct sound frequency is already in practice. Land, Sea & Air, as Sandy said.
The amount of energy needed to create sound loud enough to move an object is linear. If you want to move a cinder block you'll go deaf from 100 ft away and you'll need a hefty amount of energy and also a source of vibration. You can levitate a foam ball easily but so can a very light breeze. To move mass you need energy. Frequency is nothing without power.
Sorry, you're completely wrong there. Gravity and inertia are completely different things. Inertia is the property by which mass/matter continues in its existing state when no force is acting upon it; whereas gravity is the (attractive) property that; (i) provides mass with the feature of weight; and (ii) warps space-time according to Einstein. Newtonian gravity is unusual in that it is the only force the pulls; rather than pushes - as is the case with all other modeled forces.
Now if you had said that gravity and acceleration were the same perhaps that may be the start of an intelligent discussion about Einstein’s TOR. Take care.
@XY ZW That is why I provided you with a (simpler) Newtonian version of gravity. As, I was quite sure that - since you were already mistaken about the science involved with the so called “Anti Gravity” video as well as being clueless about what inertia and gravity are - you probably would not know about (and/or reject) other more advanced theories (such as Einstein’s theories) that require a very good grasp of astrophysics and you to accept that you're wrong. Einstein’s theory about relativity/gravity - contrary to your claims that assert it has never been proven - was largely accepted/substantiated by several tests within the 1800 and/or 1900’s; including the test which verified the theories’ ability to accurately explain/predict the (previously insurmountable/problematic) precession of the planet Mercury’s perihelion. In the mid to late 1800’s and also the early 1900’s Newton’s gravitational/other theories (particularly the Newtonian physics that dealt with 2 body systems) were unable to reliably/accurately explain/predict the precession of Mercury’s perihelion. Yet Einstein’s theory was able to resolve, what was ultimately, a shortfall in Newton’s gravitation/other theories - by way of accurately explaining/predicting the precession of the planet Mercury’s perihelion as it circled the Sun. Clearly from the fact that Isaac Newton (and others) failed to get it right, accurately explaining/predicting the precession of Mercury’s perihelion as it circled the Sun, was no simple task. You may be surprised to learn that the problem was not resolved by pretending magnetism and gravity were one and the same. The way Einstein solved the problem (to both his peer’s and also the scientific communities’ satisfaction) was (not by way of pretending magnetism equaled inertia, but) by way of applying his theory of general relativity. Please read the following slowly (and use a dictionary) so that you give yourself the best chance to understand . . . In Einstein’s theory of general relativity the precession of Mercury was modeled/represented and explained by; A) The spasmodic variance that Mercury’s perihelion/aphelion exhibited as it periodically orbited around the Sun; within its own elliptical plane. B) Treating gravity as a curvature of space-time. In doing so Einstein revealed that, unlike Newtonian Physics, his general relativity provided a means within which to solve previously insurmountable and/or complex astrophysical problems, as well as; (i) accurately explain the observed precession that Mercury and/or its perihelion/aphelion exhibited; (ii) predict the future position of Mercury; (iii) accurately forecast the amounts of precession that Mercury’s perihelion/aphelion exhibited as Mercury orbited around the Sun; and; (iv) highlight the deficiencies associated with (the widely accepted) Newtonian mechanics/physics. Given the acceptance of Newtonian mechanics at the time despite the fact that it clearly fell over when it came to explaining Mercury’s precession around the Sun and other scientific phenomena; the ability of Einstein’s theory of general relativity to reliably/accurately explain/predict the amounts of precession that Mercury’s perihelion/aphelion exhibited as it orbited around the Sun, become instrumental in ensuring that Einstein and his theory of general relativity (and therefore the concept of curved/warped space-time becoming a more accepted/accurate construct for gravity than how it was represented with Newtonian physics) ushered in a new age/theory about gravity, mass, light, space, and time. From there the fact that Einstein’s theory of general relativity was able to pass other tests and accurately reveal/predict; (i) how light behaved and/or deviated from a straight path/line (in ways that were consistent with Einstein’s theory of general relativity) in the presence of a large mass; (ii) relativistic time delays in the propagation electromagnetic signals (that were consistent with Einstein’s theory of general relativity) as a result of the electromagnetic signal path being close to a large mass and/or the Sun; and (iii) the precession of binary pulsars with only 4° arc per year of orbital shift in ways that, not only were consistent with the space-time curvatures Einstein’s theory of general relativity predicted for the binary pulsar’s precessions - but also, then went on to become the foundation for accurately calculating the masses of the 2 neutron stars constituting the binary pulsar. From there the discovery of gravitational lensing - predicted by Einstein’s theory of general relativity - further bolstered Einstein’s general relativity theory. As such, you are wrong about inertia, gravity, and how proven some of Einstein’s theories are. Furthermore, inertia and magnetism are not the same; so you're wrong there too. That said, if you were to provide *proof* that inertia and magnetism were - as you claim - supposedly same, then I would be happy to read (and/or laugh at) it. By proof, I mean your theory - that inertia and magnetism are one and the same - must be published within a respected scientific journal and be reviewed/accepted by experts in their field. Until that happens; A) Almost every deep space probe and/or GPS satellite that has been and/or currently is traversing around the earth and/or through our solar system and/or beyond; will still be utilizing aspects of Einstein’s TOR to ensure positional/other data and performance is accurate. B) Please take care and try to get some sleep.
@XY ZW You seem to have overlooked that (in addition to me previously advising that you ought read my previous post slowly and/or with a dictionary so that you give yourself the best chance to understand)I didn’t explicitly state that Einstein’s theory of general relativity served as *“proof”* for any of the theorem’s we were discussing. So, sorry to burst your little bubble there. You seem to have jumped to that conclusion all by yourself - which is a trait of bad science. Let’s try again; and this time, please read my post slowly and/or with a dictionary so that you give yourself the best chance to understand . . Here is an excerpt from my previous post and note the word *construct* . . . Jim Stanley Post 27 April 2020; “the ability of Einstein’s theory of general relativity to reliably/accurately explain/predict the amounts of precession that Mercury’s perihelion/aphelion exhibited as it orbited around the Sun, became instrumental in ensuring that Einstein and his theory of general relativity (and therefore the concept of curved/warped space-time becoming a more accepted/accurate *construct* for gravity than how it was represented with Newtonian physics) ushered in a new age/theory about gravity, mass, light, space, and time”. As such, even your recent post’s comment . . . . . XY ZW Post 28 April 2020; “the perihelion of mercury is not proof that space bends. This is merely disproof of Newton than a win for relativity”. That (whilst pretending gravitational lensing has not been observed - whilst at the same time overlooking the other examples I provided that substantiate how/why Einstein’s theory of general relativity became a more accurate theory) appears to seek to discredit Einstein’s theory of general relativity insofar as it applies to the curvature of Spacetime constituting relativistic gravity; is questionable for various reasons including the following . . . . It may well be the case that (as you seem to say) the ability of Einstein’s theory of general relativity to explain/predict the precession of Mercury’s perihelion (not the perihelion of Mercury as you put it) does not in itself substantiate that, as you say, “space bends”. Furthermore, it may also be the case that (as you seem to say) that the ability of Einstein’s theory of general relativity to explain/predict the precession of Mercury’s perihelion (not the perihelion of mercury as you put it) is also disproof of Newton’s theory. But all of that actually fits with what I stated previously. As, previously I described the success of Einstein’s theory of general relativity within the context of (at least) disproving Newtonian mechanics and providing a better *construct*; which, really, is what your below and/or above-mentioned statement basically says, before it goes astray by way of pretending the win for Einstein’s theory of general relativity never occurred. XY ZW Post 28 April 2020; “the perihelion of mercury is not proof that space bends. This is merely disproof of Newton than a win for relativity”. Only a fool would argue that Einstein and his theory of general relativity (regardless of how reliable it may be) didn’t experience a win as a result of disproving the Newtonian theory of gravity and/or providing a better *construct* (Spacetime and the curvature of it) to explain the precession of Mercury’s perihelion. If you wish to discredit Einstein’s theories your time may be better spent on; A) Understanding his theories more comprehensively and within a historical context; rather than questionably presuming acceptance/success was not granted to Einstein for his theories of relativity, and that gravitational lensing was not a part of it. B) Mathematically examining Einstein’s use of pseudotensors to represent gravitational fields. So, at this stage, as far as I am concerned, it seems you're misinterpreting my posts (possibly) as a means to portray yourself as being correct; all whilst you're yet to substantiate that magnetism and gravity are the same. So, before I move ahead and deal with your other questionable allegations and oversights . . . . . If you would kindly substantiate prove that magnetism and gravity are the same (and/or reference the scientific papers that support this view) that would be nice; as it was with this claim that your opened your first response/post time mine.
its a gamble, some ppl did the same thing and became billionaires, elon musk bil gates, steve jobs, steve vozniak to name a few, but many didn't have same luck
As long as this thing is fastened to the ground, that lift they are seeing could be from the rubbing of the thing against the bearings. If it truly lifts, then make 2 that are moving in opposite directions, attach a motor, and let the thing sit in a yard and lift off the ground. if it can do that without flipping all over the place and crashing, give me a call.
U people just don't get it there's been hundreds and hundreds of real free energy devices the elite will not let us have free power it takes away there welded death grip on the planet once that welded death grip was almost destroyed by no other than president Kennedy that's why they murdered him he was going to make the power brokers famous put a spotlight on them it's way to late now the only one that they can't corrupt and control there trying to throw in jail yes that's his name Donald trump u cannot corrupt what is already but what does is take a few cookies out of the cookie jar nothing like world domination like the kind they killed Kennedy trump is against these people
That navy video is of a distant heat signature like a jet exhaust. The shape you see in the video is hot air, and glare. The "turning" sideways is glare from the glass that's turning in front of the camera.
This is why learning some fundamentally high school physics first is important before becoming an inventor or engineer. Well, a successful one at least.
In reality, High School physics does not adequately explain the inertial reasons for rigidity in space. They only demonstrate what a gyroscope does and it's behavior.
The only problem with that is the books and professors can limit a man’s thinking, with a ‘no it’s not possible’ attitude. Many academics don’t want anyone to disturb their cosy world.
@@israelisjeshuas7009 Well most of the time when they are saying that they are counting on the respect you have for their knowledge while you are in a student or lay person's perspective. Most professors could break out the chalk bored and spend a day with you walking through the mathematics proving their statement but 1: that's a lot of effort and time to invest on both people's parts and 2: most people wouldn't understand the specialized math in the first place and it would be meaningless to them.
Dude's excuse to not do any house work or chores was to say he was building a space ship engine 😂😂😂😂
That lady's hair has been defying gravity since 1954
He's my hero
@@TonyEnglandUK 🤣
Can't tell but is his name sandy kid? Haha wow. Also this guys just brewing beer for sure
Also so glad scrooge McDuck is doing narrative voice overs
One of my strongest memories as a teenager was seeing this exact machine demonstrated on the old Nation Wide show, and I have been obsessed with toying with similar ideas involving the hidden forces of gyroscopes ever since. I can't believe I have found this again after so many decades. Thank you for posting!
What would those hidden forces be exactly? They're quite well understood, even around the time this was made.
@@matthewyabsley YES... that's the thing, right? I'm seeing some comments and... My God... People need to stop skypping classes...
@@sandokan1578skipping English classes for instance? 😂
@@gasmanrus😂😂Burn!
E=MC2 is a joke! OK let's get this correct !! #1 The only reason radio waves and AC current travel out in space and down a wire is because of the "CENTER " of a magnetic field. (The "B" field), The North and South poles are the weakest part of a magnet !! Just like Tesla said, you got to look at things you can't see !! At the center of a magnet is anti gravity, (just tap the center on any glass or plastic and it will loose weight), The center can repel water if vibrated at the correct frequency, If you vibrate the "B" field into granite rock it will become soft and you would need copper tools to work on same , you don't want to disrupt the magnetic (B")field ) with other iron. Once you understand the "B" field of a magnet and how it relates to the entire universe we live in, you will then understand what Tesla was telling everyone "LOOK FOR WHAT YOU CANNOT SEE"" .I believe the pyramids were inter galactic communications and transportation systems. Stone Henge and Gobekli Tepe , power plants. Take a look at Coral Castle Florida on CZcams and you will see a similar pilar. I believe these horizontal pillars were oscillators that would provide excitation for many things from crops in the field to anti gravity FYI: If a UFO fly's to close to you the "B" field that provides the anti gravity ("B")Field). will cancel out your power source !!!! E=MC2 is at best just a joke!!!
I like the polite professor, he knows perfectly well the machine will never work but doesn't spoil it for him and encourages him to try to improve the machine until he realizes too...
It’s nice to see Scrooge McDuck is broadening his skill set into narration.
Fucking prick.
😂
E=MC2 is a joke! OK let's get this correct !! #1 The only reason radio waves and AC current travel out in space and down a wire is because of the "CENTER " of a magnetic field. (The "B" field), The North and South poles are the weakest part of a magnet !! Just like Tesla said, you got to look at things you can't see !! At the center of a magnet is anti gravity, (just tap the center on any glass or plastic and it will loose weight), The center can repel water if vibrated at the correct frequency, If you vibrate the "B" field into granite rock it will become soft and you would need copper tools to work on same , you don't want to disrupt the magnetic (B")field ) with other iron. Once you understand the "B" field of a magnet and how it relates to the entire universe we live in, you will then understand what Tesla was telling everyone "LOOK FOR WHAT YOU CANNOT SEE"" .I believe the pyramids were inter galactic communications and transportation systems. Stone Henge and Gobekli Tepe , power plants. Take a look at Coral Castle Florida on CZcams and you will see a similar pilar. I believe these horizontal pillars were oscillators that would provide excitation for many things from crops in the field to anti gravity FYI: If a UFO fly's to close to you the "B" field that provides the anti gravity ("B")Field). will cancel out your power source !!!! E=MC2 is at best just a joke!!!
Touché sir
Top comment 😂
Should be called the how to avoid your wife and hide in the garage machine.
you got it ! , it is fake- anti tingkiling propaganda -..
How to get drunk without anyone bothering you
if my wife looked like that I'd be inventing stuff in my garage too
@@richardsonjoseph9660 lololololol
That's funny! LOL
All those years in the garage and he finally created a machine that spins.
and is seriously out of balance.
Well, spinning is a good trick.
He reinvented the wheel. A wheel that runs perfectly out of balance.
😆😆😆
With two motors one gas one electric
This is the MOST SADDEST STORY I ever witnessed. Poor guy and his wife.
People have lots of hobbies.. nobody was harmed..
@@morbidmanmusic Obviously, they don't have kids and he has no income. Very sad situation.
for most part of my life from age 5 to age 29 I been working alone on my designs until I got into college and my inventing process changed. For those inventors who keep pushing boundaries in the garage a gentle advice, a textbook or two of reading and thorough analysis will save a lot of time, money and anguish later on.
What do you invent?
@@ishkibable The guy that spent 24 years living off his parents and inventing things in their garage is ambiguous, vague and provides few details. *Surprised face*
This is a very good point.
Think way outside the box.
But make sure you've mastered the basics first
I've learned that the hard way as well.
The problem with your advice is that almost everything you learn in your text books is either completely wrong or it teaches you limitations based on our currently accepted physics. People like Sandy dont need text books they would actually hinder his ingenuity. People like Sandy are directed by unseen forces on himself. In summary, your advice for especially gifted people is BULLOCKS!
@@suckOnThese3 you can use the books as stepping stones they usually have the fundamentals which are really important when putting the pieces of a puzzle together
Anyone wearing a orange jumpsuit like that, is bout to get shit done
If he had ever sold one of his machines, he would have ended up in jail for fraud ... and wearing another orange jumpsuit.
Trent Fuller 😁🤘
😂
Hahaha had to much time in prison well he just said fuck it ill go buy an Orange jumpsuit and lets see if i can get my mojo back tada!! Tesla would be like finally someone that doesn't give a fuck what they think about him!! I think he's got a good plug that bings him some uncut breaking bad juice! Keep up the tweekkng ya killin it
Trent Fuller this may be the single funniest comment ever
Sir, I am now an old man and I have spent most of my life at similar pursuits. Nothing else mattered. I ate, slept and breathed the research of a particular device. Then came a point where I was just about broken and alone which forced me to peruse more lucrative endeavors. God bless you brother. Thank you for sharing. Sometimes inventing can be very lonely, not many people understand. Been there, done that. I wish you all the luck in the universe.
Dave G god be with us all
@@ronr.53400 Which god?
True.👍
The only God The creator of the heavens and the earth
@@JohnDoe-op8nn There are no gods, but belief in them is the cause of most of the misery on Earth. Keep your sick ideas to yourself.
That thing looks bloody lethal!
I would spend all my time in the garage too if my wife looked like that
We'll know if he was truly on to something if he ends up getting murdered in part-2.
Found dead in a dumpster, coroner states toxicology results are under investigation.
@@kkristopher7413 Just wishful thinking.
Found dead in hotel room. Apparent suicide.
You guys are very misleading it was suicide by self-strangulation he was found with his arms tied behind his back
Nah, it was an accident, he shoot himself in the head... from behind.
Orange jumpsuit , his own personal prison
Test/research pilots wear orange flight suits, I think that's where he's going with it.
Pure genius = pure creativity. Some will spend a lifetime to reach new levels, new ideas or new realities.
His naive smile as he looks at his machine in love is such a balm for the soul in these difficult times.
If 1 man in his garage can make this with no money over 4 years, imagine what an unlimited black project budget and a team of top scientific minds can do.
But that team should be creative just like him.
Having knowledge is different from having curiosity and idea
For such things we need to think out of the box. The right thought should strike our mind just at the right moment.
Already happened in the Nevada dessert 51 paper clip
Its 3 motors ..... about 50 $ worth of materials total
And people wonder where UFOs USOs. originate brom. Isn't it obvious? WE made them. they're OURS. now...let that sink in. ready? Okay now ask this question. why? just why? think about all of the secrecy in private agencies. alien abductions. attle mutilations. YOUR OWN YOUR PEOPLE ARE ***KING WITH YOU! your just sheep. now. ack to sleep little sheeple. this is all a ream >:)
Other Half to enslave us to oil and basic electricity we could of left to other planets, maybe we have, maybe there is slavery on mars, while there is a genocide on the Middle East. Who knows how far this thing goes and where it leads
His voice is similair to shawn connery and elvis presley combined
lol thought about the same, mostly the Elvis voice
its called a scottish accent. millions of people talk that way, not just sean connery lol
His hair is Elvis hair
hahahah - thats funny. I used to live a few doors down from Sean in London. One day I went out in a Tux and he passed me in the street in a scruffy tracksuit. Sort of irony.
@@joemusic2882 Wait - do you think... he IS Elvis?!
This is one of those back burner projects I never started, there was a similar design posted in a scientific journal back in the early 70's which looked like a finished product and quite different in that it was self contained.
Someone give this lady a medal for putting up with this guy 😂
More like his absence.
In the shape of a gyro.
it was great
It's the other way around
Poindexturetunes-:
He was
Awarded
A bravery commendation for actually
Getting into bed with her and
Consummating the marriage -
Bleeech!
He seems to enjoy putting his head dangerously close to that spinning thing
Ikr.
Same thing I was thinking, wonder if he died from severe head trauma?
I noticed that as well...
So when he dies touching it people will think the secret services covered his death
That’ll be the producer: “get in shot, closer... closer..”
-Did you do it?
Yes!
-What did it cost?
Everything...
Team Thanos..1
Like Leonidas in 300 movie
-Give them nothing... but take from them everything!
Team THANOS!!!
yes it is propaganda.
Although he was heading down the wrong path you have to admire his persistence. He wasn't doing a Stan Meyer on it. He genuinely thought he was on to something.
I ran a large hand held polishing machine for years at work.. The machine had a 12inch round wool pad on it. The pad was shaped like an upside down frisbee or deep dinner plate. it's edges curved upwards towards the machine itself. It was easy to feel the weight changed when the pad was rotating, as opposed to being stationary.
The very strange aspect was that when the pad was held close to any surface, the entire machine would gain noticeable weight in you hand. Then become lighter as it was moved away from the surface. I have never heard of surface proximity changing gyro effect.
could be just a vacuum effect . that disc could act as a "propellor" and when the gap gets tighter it produce enough airflow to get some suction..
you mean close but still no contact, right? I'd understand it somehow if the disc diminished its speed by any means.
Sounds like eddy currents from a coil motor and either a copper or an aluminium surface brought together. Magnetic braking basically....
"Im giving her all she's got captain"
Funny, but you forgot " She can't take no more" captain.
Haa haa ha.....shit,!!
@@rodneyharris9681 It's funny how Star Trek, sexualized the poor Enterprises ship. She has been mangled by different species, space wars, planetary gravity, time travel chasing the Borg, and it's own internal warp-drive, which acts like a giant dildo, ripping her inner coil and preventing her from taking any more. I always thought that the Captain got off on this. Lol
@@marccarrion9164 That's "She canna take any more, captain!"
@@LarryH54 Damm, I just thought about what you said, and you're right. You're 100% correct. Lol
Mr Kidd, thank you for your dedication and your gracious answers to the 'trolls'. Your work, your book and appearing on TV at the time got me to try making one as well. Which I did, and didn't comprehend the results until many years later. My system simply had two gyros, spinning in the same direction which because they were opposite each other appeared to have a contrarotation, and once they were spun up were then forced into precession. When placed on a scale and horizontal forced precession started, there was a fair bit of vibration effecting the needle on the scale. However, the needle oscillated at a weight less than normal. As maximum precessional velocity was reached the needle oscillated around the normal weight. As forced precession was ceased and the precession velocity slowed, the needle oscillated at a weight greater than normal and in the same range as at startup.
Many years later I considered that the result was a matter of;' For every action, there is an equal reaction - but not necessarily at the same time'. In other words, the system stored a reaction, resulting in initial weight loss and as precession slowed the stored reaction then occurred, resulting in increased weight equal to the weight loss.
If I had rotated the whole device through 180 degrees ( balanced by another pair of gyros) during the stored phase before reducing precession velocity then the two outputs would have occurred in the same direction. The result would then be a pulse of output acceleration upwards, followed by a pause, then another pulse in the same direction - an average acceleration in the one direction. Rather than an average velocity...
For every angular velocity (ie; precessional) there must be an angular acceleration (however small). For every angular acceleration there must be a momentary angular jerk. For every jerk, a snap. For every snap, a crackle and then onwards in the same vein a pop. We want angular acceleration so require angular jerk. I think this explains (angular jerk) why your own machine at least displayed output velocity and why the university version of your machine (machined to extremely fine tolerances which minimised any 'jerky' vibration) showed far less of an effect, if any. 'Jerk' is something that is an engineering nuisance - but for these devices is vital. How to engineer maximum jerk so that output force is created? No wonder, in the minimising of jerk in any machine by engineers, no one has noticed that reaction can be stored. That's what you did, in my opinion. When you turned so quickly on removing the aircraft gyro you induced a large jerk - sufficient to throw you UP and backwards off your feet. If you had turned with a near zero jerk you would have just toppled over backwards, feet still on the ground. More to come at some other time - I'm 60 and my tea is ready!
❤❤
Ни чего не понял но всё прочитал.
Still trying? 😄
Shut up Karen 🤡
BRAVO‼️‼️👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽‼️‼️‼️
I thought that was his mother. Holy hell no wonder he was making a time machine.
I’d love to own his prototype saucer. That’s a real life treasure right there.
bet it's made out of shortbread tin lids with tartan paint on 😂😂😂😂
Anti-Gravity Machine (part two): Somewhere in deep space....
6:25 Prof. Laithwaite could have performed a very easy test by simply standing on a scale with the disk spinning and not spinning. There is no difference in weight. He just did not understand the physics of a gyroscope which are admittedly not quite simple.
7:29
😂
@TQ jokes on you buddy, the Flux capacitor was a hoax! Besides, everyone knows you need a minimum of 4 food processors eating a full bundle of banana peels EACH to reach anywhere near 1.21 gigawatts!
I'd be building a UFO too. My god. He's trying to get his wife home.
Underrated comment LoL
Dang snap.. 💯
Dude im rolling!!
Harsh, but funny!
That comment wins the Internet sir. Well done 💰💰💰
I understand him and her 100%. It's a lonely road when you have something you want to do or prove. Either success or failures, you still want to try.
It happens to me too a lot of people when you become obsessed with something and you get so close to it from what you've imagined and put on paper and then when it comes to life it just becomes an obsession. And it is men and women like this who have changed our world look at Einstein he couldn't hold a relationship to save his life because they're obsessed the people who invented jet engines the internal combustion engine and so on these are all obsessions at one point now it's just a reality we take for granted
"Aye, I've built a machine, donkayy"
@Djaalab Joseph I was thinking shrek but ramsay works too lol
Who was it in that very strange interview when the guy just kept shouting donkey?
Probably this? Lol
czcams.com/video/N6j_13-qzDY/video.html
You must be American.
@@nairdacharles9492 *Texan
Great salute to his wife.!!!
So far it seems he might just have re-invented the Gyroscope.
Hello Phil violin maker! Retired professional violinist/violist here. I think you just might be right! Truly mind boggling isn't it? I feel sorry for his poor wife. She's a widow/divorcee without a death or court ruling to show for it. If she's still alive these forty years on, she'll be left a friendless pauper if he predeceases her. It's pretty evident at this point that it all came to naught.
Your pretty close gyroscope, the gyroscope uses a fulcrum and the arm of the gyroscope once spun presents lift. So imagine a wheel with in a wheel or more once spun presents lift as with the demonstration with the barbell. Once the barbell disc spun and the man becomes the fulcrum the barbell disc became weightless. A wheel with in a wheel activated by an engine creates anti gravity. Except the multi giro mechanism is much larger big time.
@@jojolafrite90 I pray to God Almighty that He reveals the secrets of flight and anti gravity, to His/God's Elect One's. I pray He saves that adventure for us, away from you hypocritical mockers. This govt sold itself out to fallen entities for the Knowles that we could of gotten for free from God. Obviously the helical pattern, is a pattern of the universe. And we can capture free energy if we work with nature instead of against it. And I pray that He casts down the fallen angels and their human followers and deceivers. Those in high places censoring and eliminating men who come across too much knowledge. I know they've found much more efficient ways to create flying craft using gyroscope effect and/or mercury vortex propulsion engines. The US govt has certainly studied the crap out of this and left us all in the dark.
May God give us the victory, through our trials and tribulations. Not you nay saying mocking hypocrites who do nothing but attack a man's hopes and dreams.
When all you are is a shadow. A shade of a man
@@Chompchompyerded o my goodness. The man is working out of his house... garage. His family still had access to him. His wife found a fake social life more important than discovering anti gravity. Which is exactly what he is cracking into.
Women have made this whole life into a fake materialistic splurge to beautify themselves and compete with others over God's natural gifts and have the audacity to criticize a man seeking street greatness. Bet if he created anti gravity tech and became the world's richest man. You and almost every other woman would divorce their husband to get a piece of that pie.
This world is PURE hypocrisy
@@garygallegos8202
No.
Gyro is the inside where you sit, stand, or lay down. the electric waves output is the way for proportion.
Has antigravity machine. Still opens garage door by hand
Yes. And we still do lots of things with our hands. Amazing isn't it?
@@robertdewar1752 yes huuurrrrr duuurrrrrr
This is my 3ed time watching this and it still amazes me. We r all into something we r driven to. U should be proud of yourself and your wife is someone very special.
Learn how to spell.
legend says he is still on this garage trying to figure it out
i found myself expecting the monty python crew to come barging in
Nobody expects the money python crew to come barging in
Haha I agree, the narrator sounded like Michael Palin doing a Scottish impersonation
count me in
lol so true
we are just gonna make one ourself
I saw this when I was a kid and it got me interested in machines and physics. Never thought id see it again.
I always wondered what happened to this ? 🤔
I wonder where his tech went.
@@barblitt4222 government had something to do with it
@@stanleybochenek1862 very true and very sad.
@@stanleybochenek1862 Sure buddy.
This was how my ex wife was with my coding. She was so supportive. I spent a fucking lot of hours on random projects... God do I miss her dearly.
LIES I tell you, LIES. Just admit it, life is more peaceful and simplified without her........ mine is 🤣🤣🤣
Let me guess you now own 25% of what you use to.
She was awesome wife, it was only 4 year to this point.. Behind every good man is an even better women.
Mines would tell me I worthless when I was going thru tough financial time, made me feel like utter garbage. I picked myself up and moved on. Glad there good women who supports their husband
Word.
My ex was a piece of shit though. Good riddance.
It’s really sad that people like this trick themselves into thinking they have some thing when they don’t. He even tricked his family and wasted his entire life for nothing.
I get your point but it's not wasted if he had fun and the illusion of working on a breakthrough project elevated his subjective life quality to a higher level.
Very sad to see someone so blind to the spirit of exploration and discovery. We don't find anything new by doing things we already know work. What you're advocating for is stasis.
To be fair most people waste their entire lives working and hustling away for nothing in the end anyway.
The guy could’ve saved 10 years of his life by just putting a propeller on the model airplane engine and would’ve generated more lift then his entire machine in less than five minutes
That requires air.... How u suppose that to work in enclosed environment or in space?
Thinking the same thing once I saw the starter and heard the two stroke fire
It was a make work to avoid the mrs project
If you are so smart, just do it yourself.
LOLL these comments are good.
What a great woman, and he gave it a fair shot, more power to him for trying!
You can't screw up if you never try anything, but you'll never make anything good neither..
I respect his passion.
Why does this give me Old Michael Myers Horror movie vibes 😂❤
Love the terminator style music in the beginning
If he had an America wife she would of left him already!
And force him to sell half his machinery to not continue in his work.
Ate you black American?
Giros do NOT create lift nor do they run continuously without an external energy force. BTW, this mechanism has some similarities to the governors used to control the speed of steam engines. Except static weights were used instead of rotating ones but nevertheless, produce the same effect.
nobody is calling it perpetual motion...
@@Aluttuh seriously, what's this guy talking about
@@Aluttuh True, but it raises the question - Even if this gyro can generate lift, you then have to factor in the weight of the power source and motors to run the whole thing.
@@chrisantoniou4366 i think thats the basis of the question, how much lift it could generate from various forms of power.
just imagine how fast you could get something spinning, (larger the mass the stronger the momentum, less power needed to keep it spinning... maybe its all about RPM??) with a more advanced power source? i bet there is an equation for the RPM needed to cancel out weight... although a part of me thinks it might only be generating lift by climbing up the pole from centrifugal force.
its official guys, i figured it out... UFOs are powered by fission gyros of great mass.
@@Aluttuh 😄
Merci du partage! Intéressant! Stéph. Thanks for sharing! Very interesting! Stéph.
I think he could have saved a lot of time by just learning some math and physics.
Not if he was basing his calculations on Einstein's restrictive laws, which obviously one day will be broken or surpassed by better laws and theories, as have those of other famous scientists. What would have helped is having access to the antigravity and flying machine patents designed by Nikolai Tesla, but the majority of those are still locked away. Modern science is held back by those too scared to disagree with Einstein and also by greed, as all the ingenious and new inventions are bought and paid for by the wealthy oil and electric companies, to prevent them being manufactured and ruining their profits.
Soon as he spoke I knew, seeing the women with a mouth full of Wrigley extra. I realised his mum was his sister
@@DJIInLondon LMAO!
lol
@@DJIInLondon 💀
funny that he shows us the upwards UFO flight 30 years before the US Airforce made that video public with an UFO doing exactly that
Have you been hiding under a rock?
Yeah
You mean the avrocar
Back when real women existed, bless you love
No hiccups, no loneliness which will lead to cheating. If not, then I’ll him be!! 👈🏼 that’s the attitude
of COURSE you have a Punisher avatar 😂
dude can't get laid and he blames it's the way women are today and not the bald acorn he's got between his legs
gtfoohwts 😂
@Demo he can't be an idiot, he was just onto something.
Sheesh. Spoken like a true dumbass. Hopefully you have zero women in your life 😂
@Demo I guess you didn't see the flying saucer model he had.
Looking at his wife, I can understand why he locked himself away in his garage. But he could have come up with a better excuse than building a flying saucer!
I have always believed there’s a way to manipulate gravity with magnets. Maybe if you have an enclosure with all the same polarities pushing against each other.
You got something right , I believe.
Entropy would like a word with you.
There is always an equilibrium.
Magnet fields are just electric fields seen in a moving frame of reference, lots of youtube videos on it of physics PhDs. If you can't manipulate gravity with electric fields, you can't do it with magnetic fields.
The way he motioned the craft moving is the same way bob Lazar said the sport model moved through space belly up
Watch Joe Rogan 1361
Stephen V so Bob Lazar watch this documentary
Would it have been a documentary or live broadcast or CZcams video?
So you're saying Sandy was driving?
If only more people believed in this horse shit science. Imagine how far man could go.
Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say.
John Campbell hahaha sir that was hilarious
brilliant!! *lol*
I couldn't agree more...
@JohnCampbell LOL😂😂 That was anti-climatic but very funny..👍
lol, this is why sometimes you just need to get to the point
👍😄👍
Old tv. entertaining and low budget perfection
And here it is in 2023, and his "antigravity machine" STILL hasn't taken off. I'm starting to think that he may just be crazy.
Was anyone else thinking “...what I do have are a very particular set of skills. Skills I have acquired...” - Liam Neeson, Taken
I was thinking, "how on Earth did he ever make a living as a tool-fitter?"
whow ,he dosnt seem to be concerned about having his brain cracked open with that dangerous spinning gyro.
I wish someone would crack my brain open so i can get off the horrible piece of molten rock
*head
thats what i was thinking seeing that heap of pointed metal flying around inches from his head!
The spaceship turning on its side to travel straight reminds me of how Lazar descrided the anti gravity craft he saw at the airbase he work at.
Many years I spent building my very own anti-gravity machine. Experiment after experiment. Failed test after test and then finally, I had it; my very own Anti-Gravity device. After the initial launch, all my notes on board, it all went wrong. It worked for sure, but the last I saw of it, it was flying past Pluto.
I spent as much time in my shop as I could. I also mowed the grass every day. Even with snow on the ground. I couldn't hear the fish monger even when she was six inches away. I say this man is crazy like a fox.. Well done
Eventually the husband always escapes to the garage and ends up living there.
That is why im never going to get married. I want my whole house available not just my shit confined to the garage.
@@bazookajoe8904 why do you want the whole house. The only interesting mechanical stuff happens in the shed
sssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, thats the plan
One of the greatest Rube Goldberg machine's ever made. "I did all this while working with only a very basic grasp of mathematics and physics". Should have put that quote at the beginning of the video. He's got some good mechanical ingenuity, but definitely no understanding of physics.
Just a basic understanding of conservation of momentum would have freed up his life
His suit looks like a prison jumpsuit
Wtf what year 1978 prsion?
The guy was a good machinist.
I see the flaw in this right from the start. There is a horizontal force applied to the vertical axel which makes it appear to freely travel upwards. If the gyro was freestanding it would topple over or it would need the same force applied horizontally to stop this from toppling over. Gyros are great mass distributors but they don't decease total mass
This needs to be remade with our fancy new space age materials. I saw a guy that made a carbon graphene epoxy polimer that increased the strength of epoxy resin by 700%. Super strong, super light materials.
Yeah fiberglass does the same thing lmao
They already have they are called control moment gyroscopes
Carbon is stronger so IDK WTF you are talking about.@@Mike-om4tv
Sandy, you thought, for some reason beyond me, that by tilting the gyros that would tilt the centrifugal acceleration vector, along with the angular momentum vector of the gyros. You had me doing it for a minute or two ! But why would a rotating masse's centrifugal acceleration be any different to a non-spinning one ?
It will still be perpendicular to the axis of the centrifugal rotation. Won't it ??! !? i.e. no component in the same direction as the axis of rotation.
All the spinning gyros on its rod does, while it precesses, is provide a torque, M x length of rod. This effectively shifts the C of G to the handle end of the rod.
I wonder if there's a way to combine other motion methods with the Antigravity effects of the gyros to stabilize or go in a certain direction, but with much less effort and higher speeds. And doing testing remotely as with personal Drones.
Yeah increasing the weight of the device and arms. The rotation what create counter Mass to that rotational vector. Look into nuclear spin value
3 disk left right and to left and right need to be connected to the upper one all 3 at same speed produces antigravity they will rotate on their selfs and rotate around itself ufos are not real they just created them and letting people think there are aliens instead od showing the technology they use
I have a hard time deciding if this is just incredible well crafted satire or real.
The former, no one in Scotland is called Sandy Kidd pal
@@gencorp1659Since it's Scrooge McDuck narrating, and he used to be a cowboy, he might've smuggled in one of his cowpoke buddies back to the ol' country
Love this guy so much ambition and peace in him.. amazing wife loyal respectful and so accepting.. The women of today.. would have this guy done for domestic abuse..
Considering when this was recorded you should know that she had no other option than to accept it. Back then we could not let a flat, get a credit card, or open a checking or savings account, or buy a house without a man's signature. We also made only a fraction of the amount that men made for exactly the same work, and in addition we were limited to what kinds of work we could do. Most worst jobs were considered women's work. We are much better off now because if we did get stuck with a guy who decided to go lost pilot on us we can get out of the marriage, get good jobs (still paid a bit less than the boys), open financial accounts and live a fairly normal life afterward. It's a different world now than it was then.
3:30 the way he described the saucer moving...is exactly how Bob Lazar described the craft at area 51 ...
Lazar-the-Liar?
Dude that’s exactly when I stopped and watched again. I just want to know if that was his idea or if he was influenced by something we’re unaware of...
@@named161 Given that NASA, Boeing and other US aerospace companies have pursued crackpot antigravity ideas, the American public should worry that the people at Area 51 might actually be as stupid as Kidd. After all, the CIA wasted millions on trying to develop 'death-stares', telepathy and remote-viewing, so all bets are off when the common-sense of US organisations is at issue. Perhaps their CEOs spend too much time on watching CZcams rubbish.
Is was at that moment i knew he didnt know what he was talking about, sadly, when he tilt shift the model saucer 90% he just wasted plenty of angular momentum. Hes a TINKERER.
MrAaronvee do you even know what you’re talking about. I think you’re watching too many CZcams bs
Janet is rated a good looking woman in Scotland. This is why we are so miserable.
It's the weather man......
Ha har.
@@bansheebot2 I did not see a weather man in the video?
Just a gem of a documentary.
Makes you wonder if this and mercury combined with the correct sound frequency is already in practice. Land, Sea & Air, as Sandy said.
hint...it is!
The amount of energy needed to create sound loud enough to move an object is linear. If you want to move a cinder block you'll go deaf from 100 ft away and you'll need a hefty amount of energy and also a source of vibration. You can levitate a foam ball easily but so can a very light breeze. To move mass you need energy. Frequency is nothing without power.
@@scottashe984you’re sadly mistaken.
Inspiring.
When are you doing part 2 i would like to see and here more on it
Your dedication is remarkable. The best of luck to you, never give up.
When I was a child I used to do the same thing with bike wheels. I loved playing with toy gyroscpoes.
It's brilliant! "Honey I'll be in my shop ,uh, laboratory..."
How to ignore your wife, the laws of preservation of energy , all at once while having a blast at your garage! Someone give him a medal!!
And a case of beer
lol!
@clayfame the laws of thermodynamics
6:35 - this nothing more than; physics, angular momentum, torque, and gyroscopic motion.
It is not anti-gravity.
It is similar to a governor in the fuel injecting system of a diesel engine in which the fuel is controlled with engine speed.
Sorry, you're completely wrong there.
Gravity and inertia are completely different things.
Inertia is the property by which mass/matter continues in its existing state when no force is acting upon it; whereas gravity is the (attractive) property that; (i) provides mass with the feature of weight; and (ii) warps space-time according to Einstein.
Newtonian gravity is unusual in that it is the only force the pulls; rather than pushes - as is the case with all other modeled forces.
Now if you had said that gravity and acceleration were the same perhaps that may be the start of an intelligent discussion about Einstein’s TOR.
Take care.
@XY ZW That is why I provided you with a (simpler) Newtonian version of gravity.
As, I was quite sure that - since you were already mistaken about the science involved with the so called “Anti Gravity” video as well as being clueless about what inertia and gravity are - you probably would not know about (and/or reject) other more advanced theories (such as Einstein’s theories) that require a very good grasp of astrophysics and you to accept that you're wrong.
Einstein’s theory about relativity/gravity - contrary to your claims that assert it has never been proven - was largely accepted/substantiated by several tests within the 1800 and/or 1900’s; including the test which verified the theories’ ability to accurately explain/predict the (previously insurmountable/problematic) precession of the planet Mercury’s perihelion.
In the mid to late 1800’s and also the early 1900’s Newton’s gravitational/other theories (particularly the Newtonian physics that dealt with 2 body systems) were unable to reliably/accurately explain/predict the precession of Mercury’s perihelion.
Yet Einstein’s theory was able to resolve, what was ultimately, a shortfall in Newton’s gravitation/other theories - by way of accurately explaining/predicting the precession of the planet Mercury’s perihelion as it circled the Sun.
Clearly from the fact that Isaac Newton (and others) failed to get it right, accurately explaining/predicting the precession of Mercury’s perihelion as it circled the Sun, was no simple task.
You may be surprised to learn that the problem was not resolved by pretending magnetism and gravity were one and the same.
The way Einstein solved the problem (to both his peer’s and also the scientific communities’ satisfaction) was (not by way of pretending magnetism equaled inertia, but) by way of applying his theory of general relativity.
Please read the following slowly (and use a dictionary) so that you give yourself the best chance to understand . . .
In Einstein’s theory of general relativity the precession of Mercury was modeled/represented and explained by;
A) The spasmodic variance that Mercury’s perihelion/aphelion exhibited as it periodically orbited around the Sun; within its own elliptical plane.
B) Treating gravity as a curvature of space-time.
In doing so Einstein revealed that, unlike Newtonian Physics, his general relativity provided a means within which to solve previously insurmountable and/or complex astrophysical problems, as well as; (i) accurately explain the observed precession that Mercury and/or its perihelion/aphelion exhibited; (ii) predict the future position of Mercury; (iii) accurately forecast the amounts of precession that Mercury’s perihelion/aphelion exhibited as Mercury orbited around the Sun; and; (iv) highlight the deficiencies associated with (the widely accepted) Newtonian mechanics/physics.
Given the acceptance of Newtonian mechanics at the time despite the fact that it clearly fell over when it came to explaining Mercury’s precession around the Sun and other scientific phenomena; the ability of Einstein’s theory of general relativity to reliably/accurately explain/predict the amounts of precession that Mercury’s perihelion/aphelion exhibited as it orbited around the Sun, become instrumental in ensuring that Einstein and his theory of general relativity (and therefore the concept of curved/warped space-time becoming a more accepted/accurate construct for gravity than how it was represented with Newtonian physics) ushered in a new age/theory about gravity, mass, light, space, and time.
From there the fact that Einstein’s theory of general relativity was able to pass other tests and accurately reveal/predict; (i) how light behaved and/or deviated from a straight path/line (in ways that were consistent with Einstein’s theory of general relativity) in the presence of a large mass; (ii) relativistic time delays in the propagation electromagnetic signals (that were consistent with Einstein’s theory of general relativity) as a result of the electromagnetic signal path being close to a large mass and/or the Sun; and (iii) the precession of binary pulsars with only 4° arc per year of orbital shift in ways that, not only were consistent with the space-time curvatures Einstein’s theory of general relativity predicted for the binary pulsar’s precessions - but also, then went on to become the foundation for accurately calculating the masses of the 2 neutron stars constituting the binary pulsar.
From there the discovery of gravitational lensing - predicted by Einstein’s theory of general relativity - further bolstered Einstein’s general relativity theory.
As such, you are wrong about inertia, gravity, and how proven some of Einstein’s theories are.
Furthermore, inertia and magnetism are not the same; so you're wrong there too.
That said, if you were to provide *proof* that inertia and magnetism were - as you claim - supposedly same, then I would be happy to read (and/or laugh at) it.
By proof, I mean your theory - that inertia and magnetism are one and the same - must be published within a respected scientific journal and be reviewed/accepted by experts in their field.
Until that happens;
A) Almost every deep space probe and/or GPS satellite that has been and/or currently is traversing around the earth and/or through our solar system and/or beyond; will still be utilizing aspects of Einstein’s TOR to ensure positional/other data and performance is accurate.
B) Please take care and try to get some sleep.
@XY ZW You seem to have overlooked that (in addition to me previously advising that you ought read my previous post slowly and/or with a dictionary so that you give yourself the best chance to understand)I didn’t explicitly state that Einstein’s theory of general relativity served as *“proof”* for any of the theorem’s we were discussing.
So, sorry to burst your little bubble there.
You seem to have jumped to that conclusion all by yourself - which is a trait of bad science.
Let’s try again; and this time, please read my post slowly and/or with a dictionary so that you give yourself the best chance to understand . .
Here is an excerpt from my previous post and note the word *construct* . . .
Jim Stanley Post 27 April 2020; “the ability of Einstein’s theory of general relativity to reliably/accurately explain/predict the amounts of precession that Mercury’s perihelion/aphelion exhibited as it orbited around the Sun, became instrumental in ensuring that Einstein and his theory of general relativity (and therefore the concept of curved/warped space-time becoming a more accepted/accurate *construct* for gravity than how it was represented with Newtonian physics) ushered in a new age/theory about gravity, mass, light, space, and time”.
As such, even your recent post’s comment . . . . .
XY ZW Post 28 April 2020; “the perihelion of mercury is not proof that space bends. This is merely disproof of Newton than a win for relativity”.
That (whilst pretending gravitational lensing has not been observed - whilst at the same time overlooking the other examples I provided that substantiate how/why Einstein’s theory of general relativity became a more accurate theory) appears to seek to discredit Einstein’s theory of general relativity insofar as it applies to the curvature of Spacetime constituting relativistic gravity; is questionable for various reasons including the following . . . .
It may well be the case that (as you seem to say) the ability of Einstein’s theory of general relativity to explain/predict the precession of Mercury’s perihelion (not the perihelion of Mercury as you put it) does not in itself substantiate that, as you say, “space bends”. Furthermore, it may also be the case that (as you seem to say) that the ability of Einstein’s theory of general relativity to explain/predict the precession of Mercury’s perihelion (not the perihelion of mercury as you put it) is also disproof of Newton’s theory.
But all of that actually fits with what I stated previously.
As, previously I described the success of Einstein’s theory of general relativity within the context of (at least) disproving Newtonian mechanics and providing a better *construct*; which, really, is what your below and/or above-mentioned statement basically says, before it goes astray by way of pretending the win for Einstein’s theory of general relativity never occurred.
XY ZW Post 28 April 2020; “the perihelion of mercury is not proof that space bends. This is merely disproof of Newton than a win for relativity”.
Only a fool would argue that Einstein and his theory of general relativity (regardless of how reliable it may be) didn’t experience a win as a result of disproving the Newtonian theory of gravity and/or providing a better *construct* (Spacetime and the curvature of it) to explain the precession of Mercury’s perihelion.
If you wish to discredit Einstein’s theories your time may be better spent on;
A) Understanding his theories more comprehensively and within a historical context; rather than questionably presuming acceptance/success was not granted to Einstein for his theories of relativity, and that gravitational lensing was not a part of it.
B) Mathematically examining Einstein’s use of pseudotensors to represent gravitational fields.
So, at this stage, as far as I am concerned, it seems you're misinterpreting my posts (possibly) as a means to portray yourself as being correct; all whilst you're yet to substantiate that magnetism and gravity are the same.
So, before I move ahead and deal with your other questionable allegations and oversights . . . . .
If you would kindly substantiate prove that magnetism and gravity are the same (and/or reference the scientific papers that support this view) that would be nice; as it was with this claim that your opened your first response/post time mine.
*eats popcorn in anticipation*
He worked 24 hours a day and she couldn't even brush her teeth...
With something this astonishing
It should have 500 Million views
it was all worth it , now I got my anti gravity electric car. Thanks bro...
Then we wouldnt have the petro-dollar.then the economy goes bye,bye. The civilization goes bye, bhe
This video was made in 1982 - so where is my personal flying saucer? Was his devotion paid off with success, or was his life wasted?
its a gamble, some ppl did the same thing and became billionaires, elon musk bil gates, steve jobs, steve vozniak to name a few, but many didn't have same luck
@@iTube4U They did not go against elementary physics.
Rumour has it he now lives in 1955..
As long as this thing is fastened to the ground, that lift they are seeing could be from the rubbing of the thing against the bearings. If it truly lifts, then make 2 that are moving in opposite directions, attach a motor, and let the thing sit in a yard and lift off the ground. if it can do that without flipping all over the place and crashing, give me a call.
U people just don't get it there's been hundreds and hundreds of real free energy devices the elite will not let us have free power it takes away there welded death grip on the planet once that welded death grip was almost destroyed by no other than president Kennedy that's why they murdered him he was going to make the power brokers famous put a spotlight on them it's way to late now the only one that they can't corrupt and control there trying to throw in jail yes that's his name Donald trump u cannot corrupt what is already but what does is take a few cookies out of the cookie jar nothing like world domination like the kind they killed Kennedy trump is against these people
Notice how he shows that it would fly belly up just like the one that the fighter pilots from the US Navy caught on gun cam
That caught my attention as well.
And bob Lazar
That navy video is of a distant heat signature like a jet exhaust.
The shape you see in the video is hot air, and glare. The "turning" sideways is glare from the glass that's turning in front of the camera.
Also, its targeting pod video, not the gun cam. Gun cam being slang for HUD cam.
Came here to post this lol, the flying belly up is just to much of a coincidence for me.
Well information. Good show. Well information.
Amazing 🤯
I think that people that have created anything from nothing but a idea have lived under the same conditions a uncontrollable urge to figure it out.
Aye, the greatest inventors of all our species had thier share of simple minded criticism.
This is why learning some fundamentally high school physics first is important before becoming an inventor or engineer. Well, a successful one at least.
But if you get to the same conclusion, that's genius.
In reality, High School physics does not adequately explain the inertial reasons for rigidity in space. They only demonstrate what a gyroscope does and it's behavior.
The only problem with that is the books and professors can limit a man’s thinking, with a ‘no it’s not possible’ attitude. Many academics don’t want anyone to disturb their cosy world.
@@israelisjeshuas7009 Well most of the time when they are saying that they are counting on the respect you have for their knowledge while you are in a student or lay person's perspective. Most professors could break out the chalk bored and spend a day with you walking through the mathematics proving their statement but 1: that's a lot of effort and time to invest on both people's parts and 2: most people wouldn't understand the specialized math in the first place and it would be meaningless to them.
Great excuse to get out of housework.
"Captain Kirk, I cont DOo it."
i was like that when i had got my first optumis prime for christmas
A machine that will open up the universe: guy almost hits his head on machine