Mark Rippetoe on Effective Workout Programming for Getting Strong
Vložit
- čas přidán 12. 01. 2020
- Want some help building your best body ever? Here are 5 ways I can assist whenever you’re ready, including free fitness plans, coaching, books, and more: www.mikematthews.co/yt
---
The pendulum of workout programming is always a swingin’.
Some people say frequency is the ticket. You know, you have to squat every day if you want big legs, and if you’re squatting once a week, you’ll always have pinions.
Others claim absurd amounts of volume is the key. If you’re not doing 20 to 40 sets per muscle group per week, you’re basically an unlifting slug.
And others still beat the drum for intensity over everything. Not big enough yet? Lift heavier, you trousered ape.
The bottom line is it’s an extreme world out there and many people have extreme opinions.
Today’s guest Mark Rippetoe is one of those people, but he also has over 40 years of experience with strength training and coaching and is the creator of the iconic weightlifting program Starting Strength.
In this episode, Mark and I talk workout programming, including the needs of beginners versus advanced lifters, how to know you’re no longer a novice trainee, how age affects volume needs and recovery, and more.
Buckle up!
11:13 - What is the stress recovery adaptation cycle?
19:28 - Is progressive overload the best way to get gains for a beginner?
31:57 - What is junk volume?
---
Mentioned on The Show:
Mark's Website: startingstrength.com/
Books by Mike Matthews: legionathletics.com/products/...
---
Want to get my best advice on how to gain muscle and strength and lose fat faster? Sign up for my free newsletter!
Click here: www.legionathletics.com/signup/
Want some help building your best body ever? Here are 5 ways I can assist whenever you’re ready, including free fitness plans, coaching, books, and more: www.mikematthews.co/yt
Everyone makes fun of Rip for his attitude, but every time he has something to say I listen. He's a lot smarter than everyone gives him credit for.
"Everyone"? You don't like him, do you? I have much respect for him, why do you say no one thinks he's smart? Goodbye, hater.
They attack his character because they can’t disprove his methods.
Is he smarter than you give him credit for?
Is he smarter than the over one million people who have purchased his books?
That’s because he has proved that 99% of these guys online are charlatans.
RIP is my go to guy when things get confusing.
We need a regular segment where you and Mark Rippetoe just go at it.
Great post! Been training and coaching for 30+ years. Love reading and listening to so called exerts on training. There is no exact way for every person. Mark did a great job of explaining novice vs older experienced lifters. People give programs that have 5 exercises of 5 sets for a person who has just started training. Or squating 3x per week for the 60 year old advanced lifter. Common sense should drive how we train and coach.
16:55 I got 112pounds and I don't eat nearly enough particularly protein. I estimate I could easily be 48pounds heavier. For you sceptics out there I tell you this: Starting Strength does wonders; eat properly, train properly, get some sleep and be patient.
Mike and rip have the most no b.s approach to strength and aesthetics
Great video, changed my thinking
“I know whatta f*** I’m talking about” Mark’s confidence is amazing! What a man
No bs love it
NO NONSENSE. Right on.
Accidently discovered Rip looking for a deadlift instruction video. I have both books and the one his coauthor wrote about working out over 40.
I found this interesting. At 58, working out for 6 years now, I have started the starting strength program a month ago. Going to have to back off a little.
Why would you start a poorly designed 3 day full body beginners program after 6 years of lifting? So every second week your only going to deadlift 1 set of 5... what's the point in that?
@@jakeh7236 poorly designed as defined by you? Why do you say that? I wanted to try strength training for years but didn't know how to start. Starting Strength gave me that start. Today's deadlift is going to be 400lbs for a set of three. I am way stronger than ever before.
@@jakeh7236 based on your page it looks like you are just hater trolling.
Conversation between a strength coach and a bodybuilding coach.
Two somewhat different priorities with similarities.
I could feel Mike recoil in horror at the idea of someone being 242 lb and squatting 805.
Would marks method be superior for a bjj athlete?
Or should higher reps be used and more accessories to build more support musculature, build the tendons, prevent injury and greater muscular endurance?
48:01...Go RIP!!!
lol yeah buddy!
Hey man I am a first time visitor to this channel. This is all good stuff and good job doing it. In my humble opinion, when all you did was talk about stuff I don't care about for the first minute and a half ... I wanted to leave. Fyi not trolling, just being honest.
GOAT Ripp
Is there no Anatomical adaptation phase in starting strength? What about when intermediate guys start after a long time? Aren't they novice at that time?
Having started the program more than once, just begin with novice linear progression. In a week or two or however long, when you're no longer able to add weight to each exercise, it'll be time to make changes. He now has 2 advanced beginner workouts that lead up to "intermediate". They help balance out the progression differences in the different exercises and allow more recovery time after deadlifts. It's been worthwhile for me to be humble and start at the beginning. It goes fast.
I need to see mark debate mike israetel
You can now
czcams.com/video/KExwR09QhyY/video.html
It's not necessarily a debate, but they are in there together.
On what exactly
Any friend of Ron Paul is a friend of me
🔥🔥🔥
30:37
Stuff you actually care about starts at around 11:00
The real mvp
I totally
Agree with everything but then how do you explain Tom platz employing 20-30 reps
He didn't get strong doing those reps. You can do high reps effectively once you're capable of squatting big weights for high reps. High reps are actually awesome for big exercises, but only when it's big weights for high reps.
Tom, and every pro bodybuilder, took a lot of roids. I’m not hating, Tom told be that in person in the 1980’s. That changes everything in terms of inflammation and recovery.
he apparently could do over 500 pounds squats
I know wtf I’m talking about
What about if you don't squat and use machines instead? Does it apply too?
Starting strength are very anti machines.
Except lat pull downs until you can do pull ups, and the leg press until you can squat.
Chin ups*
You might try sets of 5 reps for strength and add weight regularly, but they say that squats, bench, deadlifts, and press can increase for years.
There are no competitions using machines for strength, they’re more often used for bodybuilding, and maybe assistance exercises for strength training.
You may not be able to increase strength for years on machines.
NOOOOOO.... leg extension is shit, leg press is shit, people can NOT squat even HALF of what they put on the leg press machine, plus the range of motion is normally shit for most people, they don't even know how far to lower the damn thing, and they don't even know where to place the feet...
there is no substitute for SQUATTING.
There is a huge respect people give to having a bar on your back with a weight surpassing what YOU weigh, or twice your weight, or more, there is and cannot be any bullshit with a bar loaded like that on YOUR back, if there is any goofing, there are drastic consequences... I have seen people "leg pressing" and texting, or having a good ol conversation with someone near by!!
Same with the press and the bench press and if you're deadlifting over 1.5 your body weight. Though your body weight is a marker, it is NOT and should NOT be a limiting factor.
I dont follow mark programing , I dont like the powerclean , but this knows, yes low volum , setts off 5s, and yes back off setts dont do shit, overloade and note with pen and papir, do most off the Big lift. I learn everything I know from SS and Andy baker, follow this path SS and then HLM or TM
What about training to failure ?
Check this out: legionathletics.com/training-to-failure/
Let me guess, heavy 5s......
Might not like AOCs politics but she isdefinitely sincere
Interviewer signal to noise is excessive
Thanks for the feedback!
I know Mark has a huge knowledge about strength training and he is respected and so on but listening that high reps sets are more harmful for joints than heavy 5's is making me laughing and choking eating my after training meal. Sorry Mark but you must be fu*King joking!
Damian Materowski It’s true.
Is your opinion based on research, or just thatyou yourself have always done high reps?
@@daxisperry7644 Ask high longevity BB's like Dexter Jackson or Heath and destroyed ones like Ronie or Dorian how they were/are training. Sometimes you don't need researches but just a bit brain and common sense
@@Damian_Materowski that's only because the muscles outpace connective tissue etc on drugs. That's why heavily enhanced bodybuilders do 50 rep sets. The burn and the products that build up in the blood have a huge effect for people on gear. Not really for naturals. Naturals need lower reps. No more than maybe 8 rep sets on major compounds and of course isolation movements 10 to 12 or so. To clarify... Ronnie colemans muscle were strong but everything else is under immense strain. Bodybuilders on drugs that don't get hurt do really light weights to create a lot of metabolites in the blood which anabolic act on greatly. The same doesn't apply in naturals very much. We need lower reps. Plus if you slowly work up its fine. Plus the bone density benefits etc
8 mins in and they're still talking about politics FFS.
If "Politics" has any tangible meaning, it is most definitely an umbrella label describing the administrative side of law creation and resource distribution in any given society.
If you think Ron/Rand Paul is "honest", you are as silly as the people you criticize.
@Matt Hill
No.
@@cmack17 explain yourself. I doubt you can, but you can try.
@@lonnieporter8566
1. I could not care less about your doubts.
2. Assuming the reader is not an idiot, the original comment is clear, coherent.l and accurate.
3. If you failed to comprehend the original comment, well, that is on you.
@@cmack17 so why did you give no evidence as to why people who believe the Pauls are honest are silly?
You explained nothing, so that's on you.
@@lonnieporter8566
🤣
It is cute that you think that I am under some obligation to provide you with "evidence".
I said what I said.
Regardless, you are correct. That is "on me".
Rand Paul a good guy? 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Well, at least he’s comfortable lying all the time.
Tried to keep an open mind, but I still can't like this guy. He's that 1980's high school football coach. The phys-ed teacher who tossed a volley ball to the girls and weight belts to the boys. Hypertrophy is not his thing...frankly Matt I don't understand your connection to this guy...
You’re a troglodyte.
Maybe you are the closed minded one and listening to people who tell you to be open minded about information that doesn't match the science. Just a thought.
I love listening to Rippetoe cuz he doesn’t seem to give a sheet whether you like him or not, 😆 and his strength program takes a similar stance. Mike and Rip’s programming overlap on a whole bunch of science. The difference is Rippetoe has no concern for aesthetics. Plus, when you listen to them, they sound like great buddies. Always helps.
Optimistic Outreach You’re a vain troglodyte with nothing to back your argument up with. You’re the type of person who would be conned by a politician because what he says sounds wonderful but when an self admitted asshole speaks the truth, you will close your mind due to you having an emotional response instead of a logical one.
Optimistic Outreach his name is Mike......