Any tips on iMac users? I have the latest iMac (M3, 8core, 24GB) can use UE5 fine with some settings turned down but there are certain features that simply don’t work (nanite, certain landscaping brushes). Would it help at all to get an external GPU, or maybe a future UE upgrade will work better with Mac anyway? Idunno. Your thoughts would be appreciated.
@@bigheadrhino Thanks for the great question. UE5 is optimised for systems running Windows, and while the M3 chip is a veritable powerhouse, it can't compete with Nvidia GPUs when it comes to optimised tasks found in UE5. I'm not overly experienced with Mac and UE5, but some forums mention M3 supporting Nanite. It could be worth looking into the UE5 settings and ensuring they are enabled. Some users report it being turned off by default when running on MacOS. I don't believe the M3 supports an external GPU (eGPU) (at least not Nvidia tech), which is one of the new platform's major drawbacks. If anyone has any insights to add, please share, and we can all learn! Thanks for watching and commenting and good luck with your creative endeavours! Cheers, Craig
@@princelyan3m149@princelyan3m149 Any comment is a good one! ... thanks for watching, and if you do have a question or any tips to share, drop them here! Cheers, Craig
Awesome! What a great comment to get :) We will keep sharing our knowledge, and we really appreciate you taking the time to share your experience! Thanks for supporting our efforts! Cheers, Craig
Wow, what a great comment to start the day! Thanks and it’s really cool to know this one hit the mark! Any tech related questions, send them our way and we will do our best to answer them and hope to see you on the next one! Cheers, Craig
intel is definitly not best CPU for UE5. read this : Unreal Engine supervisor at ModelFarm blasts 50% failure rate with Intel chips - company switching to AMD's Ryzen 9 9950X, praises single-threaded performance and then he said For those curious at work our failure rate for our 13900k and 14900k machines is about 50% so far, any new machine builds going to be 9950x's, production environments need reliability
Hey, thanks for your comment and for taking the time to share your insights. This has been a rollercoaster time for the industry, and who would have thought we'd ever be in a place where AMD was seen as the safe bet?! To give some context that might help balance your perspective, of all the workstations we have shipped with Intel 13th and 14th Gen chips into production environments, we have had exactly zero-yes, zero systems show this issue. Lucky? perhaps, yes, but I think it's important to share as otherwise, it would seem like half or more of the chips out there are failing, and that's just not what we see. If you have an Intel chip that has shown no issues, updates from Intel and board partners are now available to ensure you don't eventually have this problem - happy days :) We shipped our first Intel systems with these updates to clients yesterday. Sadly, if an Intel ship has had an issue, then an RMA to Intel will be needed-and I agree entirely that downtime in a production environment is not a good thing! As for the new AMD 9000 chips, single-core performance and efficiency are good, and I don't blame anyone who has experienced an issue (or not) in deciding to move to AMD. We have seen an increase in AMD sales, and there's no doubt AMD will be making some power plays to capture market share. A competitive marketplace is needed to drive innovation and value to end users, so in the long run, this may deliver better chips from both vendors and more competitive pricing. Again, thanks for sharing your insights and taking the time to comment. As we try to grow our community here on CZcams, your comments are incredibly important! Hope you stick around! Cheers, Craig
I’ve a question, would I regret buying Macbook M3 Max with 96GB or 128GB unified memory if my scenes are very intensive? I know render times will not compete with Nvidia RTX, but will it handle massive scenes better because of the vram? I’m a filmmaker and trying to find the best solution as I travel a lot.
Thanks for getting in touch! The Macbooks are fantastic video editing laptops using Final Cut Pro, however, like you said the capabilities are limited compared to a Windows based laptop. Depending on the software you use, our recommendation would be to move over to a Windows based laptop , as they will be more powerful and have the ability to utilise their power in a lot more applications
I have an RX 6700XT, and I am a beginner in UE5, so I was thinking of swapping my GPU with an RTX 4060, as Nvidia has good support for development software. I need suggestions.
The RTX 4060 like you said offers a broader support system compared to AMDs RX range however, if you're looking for a boost in performance then you may need to look at the RTX 4060Ti or above. Ohhh if you're not in a rush, the new NVIDIA range might be announced soon 👀
The RTX 3070 is a more powerful GPU compared to the RTX 4060, however, if you're not in a hurry maybe wait a few months as NVIDIA will announce its new line-up which usually means the old gen cards will drop in price again
Y'all should mention that for RAM, more isn't always better. You want as much RAM as you can get in two sticks, due to CPU limitations on clock speed when mounting more than 2 slots. 2x48 is about as good as you can get these days.
Thanks a ton for your insightful comment and for supporting the channel! You bring up a great point about RAM configurations. You're right-while modern CPUs like the i9-14900K are incredibly powerful, they often perform best with dual-channel memory setups. Using two sticks instead of four can help maintain higher clock speeds and system stability. For tasks like Unreal Engine development, where you need a lot of memory, balancing the quantity and speed of your RAM is key. I'll definitely include this important tip in future videos. Thanks again for sharing your expertise and helping out the community! Cheers, Craig
Hey there! Great question! Both the 7950X3D and the 7800X3D are fantastic CPUs, but they cater to slightly different needs. The 7950X3D has more cores (16 vs. 8) and threads (32 vs. 16), which can benefit tasks that require heavy multitasking or parallel processing, like some complex rendering and simulations in Unreal Engine 5. However, the 7800X3D has the same 3D V-Cache technology and might be more cost-effective for most gaming and general UE5 tasks since not all processes will utilise the extra cores of the 7950X3D. So, if your focus is mainly on Unreal Engine 5 and gaming, the 7800X3D is a solid choice. But if you're juggling many heavy-duty tasks at once, the 7950X3D might be worth the extra investment. Hope that helps and thanks for supporting our little channel! Cheers, Craig
Hello @katon3442 thanks for getting in touch. Sadly this is not the case in this scenario. The RTX 4060 due to its more refined architecture and overall performance stats, gives the RTX 4060 the lead over the RTX 3060. Yes VRAM is important but so it RAW power.
The information is very helpful and would totally follow when I will assemble a PC in future. Is it recommended to use high end gaming laptops such as Asus Rog Strix Scar m16/m18 or Lenovo Legion Pro 7 as a mobile option for UE5 setup?
Thanks for getting in touch, and your kind words! These laptops are certainly mobile workstations and would be great alternatives to a desktop if your current situation only allows you a laptop. Of course the performance would dip compared to a desktop, but both the ROG and Lenovo laptops will not be slow in anyway - Ryan
3:02 really wanted to listen to this, kept turning up volume but not only that it is low, but you are also pretty soft spoken, both dont do well together. try to work on that.
Always happy to get feedback. With each video we try to improve on sound, lighting and, of course, content quality! Hope you choose to stick around! Cheers, Craig
For a more budget friendly build, the 5600X is the best bet for the cheapest option. Moving to the likes of the 7600 you have to consider the more expensive motherboards and DDR5 memory you will need to use . Selecting the 5600X also allows you to upgrade to faster models should wish later on down the line, as AMD have confirmed a refresh of the 5000 series chips, which is a big W from AMD.
@@bait-kx1ph If you're looking for the best bang for your buck and don’t mind losing a few percentage points of performance, go with the Ryzen 5 5600. If you want that extra bit of performance and are okay with spending a bit more, go for the 5600X. The 5600X has a slightly higher base and boost clock speed, translating to a minor performance bump in single-core and multi-core tasks. In either case, you're getting a great CPU for the price! Happy building, and thanks for watching!
Hello thanks for getting in touch! Sadly we currently don't ship to the US at the moment, however if you're able to email us with the specifications you're looking at we can see if this is possible - thanks
For most Unreal Engine 5 developers, the AMD 7900 will provide more than enough power. However, if you’re working on particularly large projects or need every bit of performance you can get, the 7900X might be the way to go. Pair either of these with good cooling, a strong GPU and plenty of RAM, and you’ll have a system ready to tackle UE5 development with ease. Thanks for your question and for watching. It really helps our little channel! Cheers, Craig
Hey, great question! The decision between the 7800X3D and the 7900 depends on your specific needs and workflow in Unreal Engine 5. 7800X3D: This CPU is a beast for gaming thanks to its 3D V-Cache, which boosts performance in-game engine environments. If your UE5 work involves a lot of real-time rendering or you're focusing on game development, this could give you an edge with higher frame rates and better in-game performance. 7900: Conversely, the 7900 offers more cores, which means better multi-threading performance. If you're doing a lot of heavy compiling, rendering, or multitasking (like running UE5 alongside other intensive applications), those extra cores will come in handy. Bottom line: If your main focus is on gaming or real-time applications within UE5, the 7800X3D is a solid choice. But if you're looking for a more versatile CPU that can handle a broader range of tasks, the 7900 might be the way to go. Either is a solid choice. Still not sure, let the price be the decider. Want a curve ball? You should look at the new 9000 series chips. We are still watching benchmarks, but 9900x is a little faster and way more power efficient than a 7900x! Hope that helps clear things up! Let me know if you have any other questions. Cheers, Craig
@@utopiacomputers Yes you said it right. In my country 7800x3d is cheaper than both 7900 and 7900x. 9000 isn't available yet and it won't bring much difference on the table. Also, 7800x3d is a beast in it's own. Still today, 5800x3d is rock solid in games. 7800x3d will definitely run gta 6 way better than 7900 could ever do in future. I need unreal engine to work just smoothly. So 40 50 fps in viewport is more than enough for me. 7800x3d won't be anywhere far behind 7900.
@@connorjade5460 Awesome, it looks like we found a winner. On a gaming note, there is currently a bug in Windows that is dropping the performance of Zen 4 and Zen 5 chips by up to 7% in gaming. This should be patched soon, and then everyone will get a nice boost in games. It's worth saying that in productivity apps, there is no increase in speed. Cheers!
stay away from the 14900 and 13900 till they fix their problems with oxydation and crashing your system that a major issue with game developers get a safe and not much slower 12700 or 12900 and rock out with no worries
Hey there! Thanks for your input! You're spot on. At the time of writing, there are some issues with the 14900 and 13900. However, we are hoping updates from Intel and board partners will arrive in the next few weeks. After that, we should see everything settle down. While the 12700 and 12900 are still great options, don't forget that AMD also has some cracking alternatives if you want to use new tech like DDR5 and the latest NVMe storage. Thanks for sharing your thoughts and for taking the time to comment. It all helps add value to the community we are building around this channel. Cheers, Craig
@@deadeye_plays Hi there, all of the CPUs that were affected by the chip code issues have now been (touch wood) resolved with motherboard BIOS updates. Therefore , if you were to ask if the 13700 is a good CPU for UE5 then our answer would now be yes!
Do you really recommend i7 ad i9 14th gen with k processors? So if you RECOMMEND you will pay if something goes wrong with my PC and i will lose my job on it? Super, I will buy i9 and will watch wat will heppen! 😂😂😂
Hey, First off, thanks a ton for dropping by and sharing your thoughts! It’s been a wild ride in the industry lately, right? Who would’ve guessed we’d live in a world where AMD is considered the “safe bet”? Crazy times! To add a bit of context from our side: out of all the workstations we've shipped with Intel's 13th and 14th Gen chips, we've had a grand total of zero (yep, zero!) systems showing the infamous issue. Lucky streak? Maybe. But I think it's important to share because, honestly, the internet can sometimes make it feel like half of these chips are ticking time bombs. That's just not what we’re seeing in the field. If you’re rocking an Intel chip and haven’t had any issues, good news! Intel and the board partners have rolled out updates to make sure you’re all set and don’t run into this problem in the future-happy days, indeed! We’ve already started shipping our first batch of Intel systems with these updates, so we’re ahead of the curve there. Now, if your Intel chip has thrown a tantrum (ugh, we know, not ideal), an RMA is the way to go. And yeah, I totally get it-downtime in a production environment is no joke. No one wants to see their workflow grind to a halt, or worse, jobs on the line! On the AMD front, we are definitely seeing an uptick in interest. AMD’s making some serious moves to grab market share, and we’re here for it. Competition is what keeps this industry alive and kicking, driving innovation and delivering better products and prices for all of us. So, in the grand scheme of things, maybe this is just what we need to see even better chips from both sides. Thanks again for engaging with us. We’re building a community here, and every comment like yours adds loads of value. Hope you stick around for more! Stay awesome, Craig
@@utopiacomputers thx for your time! I hear that intel problems are deeper than you think and some dev has huge problems with i9 14th gen! I always used to buy intel but this can be critical moment. After windows update amd are faster another 10% with low 🤒 so i think that can be safer way! Kind regards
Thanks for the feedback! I'm always looking to improve, so I really appreciate you pointing that out. I'll work on getting the audio levels up and improving the mic quality for future videos. Stay tuned, and thanks for watching! Craig
Questions or top tips for Unreal Engine 5? Drop them in here and we can all learn! Cheers, Craig
Any tips on iMac users? I have the latest iMac (M3, 8core, 24GB) can use UE5 fine with some settings turned down but there are certain features that simply don’t work (nanite, certain landscaping brushes). Would it help at all to get an external GPU, or maybe a future UE upgrade will work better with Mac anyway? Idunno. Your thoughts would be appreciated.
@@bigheadrhino Thanks for the great question. UE5 is optimised for systems running Windows, and while the M3 chip is a veritable powerhouse, it can't compete with Nvidia GPUs when it comes to optimised tasks found in UE5. I'm not overly experienced with Mac and UE5, but some forums mention M3 supporting Nanite. It could be worth looking into the UE5 settings and ensuring they are enabled. Some users report it being turned off by default when running on MacOS.
I don't believe the M3 supports an external GPU (eGPU) (at least not Nvidia tech), which is one of the new platform's major drawbacks.
If anyone has any insights to add, please share, and we can all learn!
Thanks for watching and commenting and good luck with your creative endeavours! Cheers, Craig
I
@@princelyan3m149@princelyan3m149 Any comment is a good one! ... thanks for watching, and if you do have a question or any tips to share, drop them here! Cheers, Craig
You guys built my pc 4 years ago and it’s never had a problem . I’ll listen to everything you say ,great job guys .
Awesome! What a great comment to get :) We will keep sharing our knowledge, and we really appreciate you taking the time to share your experience! Thanks for supporting our efforts! Cheers, Craig
One of the most informative PC videos I have ever watched you have earned a subscriber!
Wow, what a great comment to start the day! Thanks and it’s really cool to know this one hit the mark! Any tech related questions, send them our way and we will do our best to answer them and hope to see you on the next one! Cheers, Craig
intel is definitly not best CPU for UE5. read this : Unreal Engine supervisor at ModelFarm blasts 50% failure rate with Intel chips - company switching to AMD's Ryzen 9 9950X, praises single-threaded performance and then he said For those curious at work our failure rate for our 13900k and 14900k machines is about 50% so far, any new machine builds going to be 9950x's, production environments need reliability
Hey, thanks for your comment and for taking the time to share your insights. This has been a rollercoaster time for the industry, and who would have thought we'd ever be in a place where AMD was seen as the safe bet?!
To give some context that might help balance your perspective, of all the workstations we have shipped with Intel 13th and 14th Gen chips into production environments, we have had exactly zero-yes, zero systems show this issue. Lucky? perhaps, yes, but I think it's important to share as otherwise, it would seem like half or more of the chips out there are failing, and that's just not what we see.
If you have an Intel chip that has shown no issues, updates from Intel and board partners are now available to ensure you don't eventually have this problem - happy days :)
We shipped our first Intel systems with these updates to clients yesterday.
Sadly, if an Intel ship has had an issue, then an RMA to Intel will be needed-and I agree entirely that downtime in a production environment is not a good thing!
As for the new AMD 9000 chips, single-core performance and efficiency are good, and I don't blame anyone who has experienced an issue (or not) in deciding to move to AMD. We have seen an increase in AMD sales, and there's no doubt AMD will be making some power plays to capture market share.
A competitive marketplace is needed to drive innovation and value to end users, so in the long run, this may deliver better chips from both vendors and more competitive pricing.
Again, thanks for sharing your insights and taking the time to comment. As we try to grow our community here on CZcams, your comments are incredibly important!
Hope you stick around!
Cheers, Craig
I’ve a question, would I regret buying Macbook M3 Max with 96GB or 128GB unified memory if my scenes are very intensive?
I know render times will not compete with Nvidia RTX, but will it handle massive scenes better because of the vram?
I’m a filmmaker and trying to find the best solution as I travel a lot.
Thanks for getting in touch! The Macbooks are fantastic video editing laptops using Final Cut Pro, however, like you said the capabilities are limited compared to a Windows based laptop. Depending on the software you use, our recommendation would be to move over to a Windows based laptop , as they will be more powerful and have the ability to utilise their power in a lot more applications
I have an RX 6700XT, and I am a beginner in UE5, so I was thinking of swapping my GPU with an RTX 4060, as Nvidia has good support for development software. I need suggestions.
The RTX 4060 like you said offers a broader support system compared to AMDs RX range however, if you're looking for a boost in performance then you may need to look at the RTX 4060Ti or above. Ohhh if you're not in a rush, the new NVIDIA range might be announced soon 👀
Should I get a rtx 3070 or a rtx 4060, I found them for similar prices
The RTX 3070 is a more powerful GPU compared to the RTX 4060, however, if you're not in a hurry maybe wait a few months as NVIDIA will announce its new line-up which usually means the old gen cards will drop in price again
Y'all should mention that for RAM, more isn't always better. You want as much RAM as you can get in two sticks, due to CPU limitations on clock speed when mounting more than 2 slots. 2x48 is about as good as you can get these days.
Thanks a ton for your insightful comment and for supporting the channel! You bring up a great point about RAM configurations.
You're right-while modern CPUs like the i9-14900K are incredibly powerful, they often perform best with dual-channel memory setups. Using two sticks instead of four can help maintain higher clock speeds and system stability.
For tasks like Unreal Engine development, where you need a lot of memory, balancing the quantity and speed of your RAM is key. I'll definitely include this important tip in future videos.
Thanks again for sharing your expertise and helping out the community! Cheers, Craig
Awesome video, just what I was looking for cheers!
Wow, thanks for letting us know. Glad you got value from the video and cheers for commenting, it means a lot to small channels like ours! Craig 😎
Hi , just a question isnt the 7950x3d better than 7800x3d ?
Hey there! Great question! Both the 7950X3D and the 7800X3D are fantastic CPUs, but they cater to slightly different needs.
The 7950X3D has more cores (16 vs. 8) and threads (32 vs. 16), which can benefit tasks that require heavy multitasking or parallel processing, like some complex rendering and simulations in Unreal Engine 5. However, the 7800X3D has the same 3D V-Cache technology and might be more cost-effective for most gaming and general UE5 tasks since not all processes will utilise the extra cores of the 7950X3D.
So, if your focus is mainly on Unreal Engine 5 and gaming, the 7800X3D is a solid choice. But if you're juggling many heavy-duty tasks at once, the 7950X3D might be worth the extra investment. Hope that helps and thanks for supporting our little channel! Cheers, Craig
@@utopiacomputers thanks i opted to go for 7950x3d
@@sanidhyadevgupta6452 Nice! Enjoy your new system! Cheers, Craig
isnt the 3060 12gb better than the 4060 8gb? I thought more vram is better
Hello @katon3442 thanks for getting in touch. Sadly this is not the case in this scenario. The RTX 4060 due to its more refined architecture and overall performance stats, gives the RTX 4060 the lead over the RTX 3060. Yes VRAM is important but so it RAW power.
The information is very helpful and would totally follow when I will assemble a PC in future. Is it recommended to use high end gaming laptops such as Asus Rog Strix Scar m16/m18 or Lenovo Legion Pro 7 as a mobile option for UE5 setup?
Thanks for getting in touch, and your kind words! These laptops are certainly mobile workstations and would be great alternatives to a desktop if your current situation only allows you a laptop. Of course the performance would dip compared to a desktop, but both the ROG and Lenovo laptops will not be slow in anyway - Ryan
@@utopiacomputers Thanks so much for your comment, this will be very helpful!
@@PrasadNarse We are here to help! Cheers!
Very helpful video, thanks!
Thank you very much for your kind comment! We really do appreciate it
ty very much sir!
It's all good! Thanks for taking the time to comment and for watching our video. Your support means a lot to small channels like ours! Cheers, Craig
3:02 really wanted to listen to this, kept turning up volume but not only that it is low, but you are also pretty soft spoken, both dont do well together. try to work on that.
Alright Scorsese, how about you just mind your business poppet.
Always happy to get feedback. With each video we try to improve on sound, lighting and, of course, content quality! Hope you choose to stick around! Cheers, Craig
Thanks for the support! Very appreciated and thanks again for taking the time to watch and comment! Cheers, Craig
I have a low budget should i get 12600k , 5600 , 5700 , 7600
For a more budget friendly build, the 5600X is the best bet for the cheapest option. Moving to the likes of the 7600 you have to consider the more expensive motherboards and DDR5 memory you will need to use . Selecting the 5600X also allows you to upgrade to faster models should wish later on down the line, as AMD have confirmed a refresh of the 5000 series chips, which is a big W from AMD.
@@utopiacomputers should I go with 5600 price 145$ , or 5600x priced 162$
And thank you for the help.
@@bait-kx1ph If you're looking for the best bang for your buck and don’t mind losing a few percentage points of performance, go with the Ryzen 5 5600. If you want that extra bit of performance and are okay with spending a bit more, go for the 5600X. The 5600X has a slightly higher base and boost clock speed, translating to a minor performance bump in single-core and multi-core tasks.
In either case, you're getting a great CPU for the price!
Happy building, and thanks for watching!
Do you ship to the U.S.?
Hello thanks for getting in touch! Sadly we currently don't ship to the US at the moment, however if you're able to email us with the specifications you're looking at we can see if this is possible - thanks
What about 7900 and 7900x
For most Unreal Engine 5 developers, the AMD 7900 will provide more than enough power. However, if you’re working on particularly large projects or need every bit of performance you can get, the 7900X might be the way to go. Pair either of these with good cooling, a strong GPU and plenty of RAM, and you’ll have a system ready to tackle UE5 development with ease. Thanks for your question and for watching. It really helps our little channel! Cheers, Craig
@@utopiacomputers I'm planning to get a 7800x3d. And I'm confused. Should I get it or should I go with 7900, which gives you more cores?
Hey, great question! The decision between the 7800X3D and the 7900 depends on your specific needs and workflow in Unreal Engine 5.
7800X3D: This CPU is a beast for gaming thanks to its 3D V-Cache, which boosts performance in-game engine environments. If your UE5 work involves a lot of real-time rendering or you're focusing on game development, this could give you an edge with higher frame rates and better in-game performance.
7900: Conversely, the 7900 offers more cores, which means better multi-threading performance. If you're doing a lot of heavy compiling, rendering, or multitasking (like running UE5 alongside other intensive applications), those extra cores will come in handy.
Bottom line: If your main focus is on gaming or real-time applications within UE5, the 7800X3D is a solid choice. But if you're looking for a more versatile CPU that can handle a broader range of tasks, the 7900 might be the way to go. Either is a solid choice. Still not sure, let the price be the decider.
Want a curve ball? You should look at the new 9000 series chips. We are still watching benchmarks, but 9900x is a little faster and way more power efficient than a 7900x!
Hope that helps clear things up! Let me know if you have any other questions. Cheers, Craig
@@utopiacomputers Yes you said it right. In my country 7800x3d is cheaper than both 7900 and 7900x. 9000 isn't available yet and it won't bring much difference on the table. Also, 7800x3d is a beast in it's own. Still today, 5800x3d is rock solid in games. 7800x3d will definitely run gta 6 way better than 7900 could ever do in future. I need unreal engine to work just smoothly. So 40 50 fps in viewport is more than enough for me. 7800x3d won't be anywhere far behind 7900.
@@connorjade5460 Awesome, it looks like we found a winner. On a gaming note, there is currently a bug in Windows that is dropping the performance of Zen 4 and Zen 5 chips by up to 7% in gaming. This should be patched soon, and then everyone will get a nice boost in games. It's worth saying that in productivity apps, there is no increase in speed. Cheers!
stay away from the 14900 and 13900 till they fix their problems with oxydation and crashing your system that a major issue with game developers get a safe and not much slower 12700 or 12900 and rock out with no worries
Hey there! Thanks for your input! You're spot on. At the time of writing, there are some issues with the 14900 and 13900. However, we are hoping updates from Intel and board partners will arrive in the next few weeks. After that, we should see everything settle down.
While the 12700 and 12900 are still great options, don't forget that AMD also has some cracking alternatives if you want to use new tech like DDR5 and the latest NVMe storage. Thanks for sharing your thoughts and for taking the time to comment. It all helps add value to the community we are building around this channel. Cheers, Craig
@@utopiacomputerswhat about 13700?
@@deadeye_plays Hi there, all of the CPUs that were affected by the chip code issues have now been (touch wood) resolved with motherboard BIOS updates. Therefore , if you were to ask if the 13700 is a good CPU for UE5 then our answer would now be yes!
Do you really recommend i7 ad i9 14th gen with k processors? So if you RECOMMEND you will pay if something goes wrong with my PC and i will lose my job on it? Super, I will buy i9 and will watch wat will heppen! 😂😂😂
Hey,
First off, thanks a ton for dropping by and sharing your thoughts! It’s been a wild ride in the industry lately, right? Who would’ve guessed we’d live in a world where AMD is considered the “safe bet”? Crazy times!
To add a bit of context from our side: out of all the workstations we've shipped with Intel's 13th and 14th Gen chips, we've had a grand total of zero (yep, zero!) systems showing the infamous issue. Lucky streak? Maybe. But I think it's important to share because, honestly, the internet can sometimes make it feel like half of these chips are ticking time bombs. That's just not what we’re seeing in the field.
If you’re rocking an Intel chip and haven’t had any issues, good news! Intel and the board partners have rolled out updates to make sure you’re all set and don’t run into this problem in the future-happy days, indeed! We’ve already started shipping our first batch of Intel systems with these updates, so we’re ahead of the curve there.
Now, if your Intel chip has thrown a tantrum (ugh, we know, not ideal), an RMA is the way to go. And yeah, I totally get it-downtime in a production environment is no joke. No one wants to see their workflow grind to a halt, or worse, jobs on the line!
On the AMD front, we are definitely seeing an uptick in interest. AMD’s making some serious moves to grab market share, and we’re here for it. Competition is what keeps this industry alive and kicking, driving innovation and delivering better products and prices for all of us. So, in the grand scheme of things, maybe this is just what we need to see even better chips from both sides.
Thanks again for engaging with us. We’re building a community here, and every comment like yours adds loads of value. Hope you stick around for more!
Stay awesome, Craig
@@utopiacomputers thx for your time! I hear that intel problems are deeper than you think and some dev has huge problems with i9 14th gen! I always used to buy intel but this can be critical moment. After windows update amd are faster another 10% with low 🤒 so i think that can be safer way! Kind regards
your voice is too low. improve your microphone
Thanks for the feedback! I'm always looking to improve, so I really appreciate you pointing that out. I'll work on getting the audio levels up and improving the mic quality for future videos. Stay tuned, and thanks for watching! Craig
The mic sounds fine, just need to up the level a bit...