This video just made my mind up. As you have the fx3 with the sigma, so I would have the same set up. going to buy the sigma 24-70mm art lens tomorrow, thanks for the great video bro 💯
Coming from APS-C I was first turned down by the size/weight of this lens. But then I started to use it more and it pretty much replaced all my lenses for some jobs. Now I finally got an FX3 and it's a beast of a combo!
One of my two favorite lens to bring with me, I carry both this and the 14-24mm on all my trips. They’re both pretty heavy but it’s not bad when on is in your hand and the other in the backpack. Its ultra sharp And a pressure to work with. It’s a good alternative to the GM if you want to save money
You touched on all the important points when considering this lens, I used to own the Sony 24-105, but sold it and purchased the Sigma 24-70 art. I was very happy with the versatility of the 24-105, but wanted a 2.8, and after researching my options I decided on the Sigma 24-70 and can attest to the the superior quality of this lens. I generally like to stay with Sony native lenses, but as this 24-70 was designed specifically (not modified) for Sony, I was confident on it being a good match. Coupled with the Sony 100-400 GM, I now have two lenses that cover a broad range of focus lengths.
@@max-olson I did miss the extra reach of the 24-105 at first, but with my other lens the Sony 100-400 that I purchased, I think I have the ideal combination. I did a fair amount of research and found that the Sigma 24-70 2.8 was made specifically for Sony e mount and was comparable to the Sony version. I have taken some off the cuff low light shots and have been very pleased with the results. No regrets
This lens has been a dream, the autofocus is bang on every time and I’m loving that I have the option of a sharp image or soften things up. The weight is solid and I honestly prefer it. I don’t think anyone knows how good this setup is unless they’ve shot on a pocket 4K/6k setup haha
It’s insane right? The weight isn’t bad for the majority of scenarios, which makes it easy to keep haha Oh yeah those pocket rigs were so ridiculous haha
thank you! both are great options, I felt the 24-70 was better for my needs! 28-70 I would be okay for travel stuff, but it didn't have that richness the art has!
You should get more subs and views. Your videos are good enough and your color grading are beautiful. I found your channel because I'm going to buy Sigma 24-70. Thanks. Keep up the good work.
Oddly enough I think this convinced me to get the 28-70 for the FX3. I’m mainly going to be using it to film my personal life and CZcams stuff and the size would most likely keep me from pulling it out. 20/1.8 + 28-70/2.8 might be the winner.
@@thomas.kovacik I just bought the FX3 and 20/1.8. With the active crop you basically get up to 24mm if you need some stabilization. Leaning towards this 28-70 as my run and gun, but worried about micro jitters. How is it working out for you? Also, I appreciate this video for clearing up the dust debate 👍🏻
@@sointoyou8153 nice! Ive been rocking standard stabilization for everything recently, it's been working well! It's nice to have that bit of stabilization for the jitters, and not having it crop down
@@thomas.kovacik there’s a new Smallrig compact v mount thingy to put a v mount battery for added weight and ofcors longer run time.. instead of the whole title kit with rods and rails..any thoughts ?
Have heard so much good stuff about this lens. Seems like Sigma has created something special here. I have so many primes in this focal length area, that it makes no sense for me. But I thought about it severeal times. Thanks for the review. You sound like a Sigma ambassador a little bit in the beginning ;)
it's solid! hah, I'm just passionate about things that make sense financially / performance wise for people. No reason to hype up a $2000 lens if a $1100 lens does the same stuff hah
This video definitely helped my decision. I plan to travel for my photography so to have something versatile in my bag would minimize how many lenses I’d need to take with me. The GM II is quite expensive, but I think this lens would do.
Been really looking for details about dust and weather resistance. glad you said about the rubber gasket. thank you very muchfor this well made video 🎉
Hi I have 20 mm 1.8 sony lens. Do you think better to sell it and buy sigma 24-70 or keep it and buy sigma 28-70? For now I use 20 mm and 35 1.8 sony apsc. All is really good for doing youtube. But i need to replace apsc lens and to have 70 mm lens to shot.
I've got the DG DN 85mm and 35mm, which I love, but I've only got a one body set up... so I've just ordered this beaut of a lens, just watching reviews until it arrives tomorrow! haha. Great video, thanks for sharing.
@@thomas.kovacik thank you! I was legit going through same lenses you suggested at the end , was like “do I have to get that g master?” Game changer 🙏🏽
so rad haha, yeah I'm sure the gm lenses are great, especially that gm 2, buuuuut, is it worth twice the price of the sigma? I'd argue no haha, I have no plans to upgrade to one. But if sony ever desides to send me one, sure I'd use it haha. But for now, the sigma keeps me stoked! well worth the 1100
I habe both, the Sigma 24-70mm and the new Tamron 35-150mm f2.0-2.8, for the most things now I use the 35-150mm, I only put on the 24-70 if I really need the 24mm.
I currently have Tamron 28-75 but this lens is soft at 2.8f. Now i can't decide to buy Sigma 24-70 or Tamron 35-150 for Run and Gun photo & video stuff.
The weight and size has been the main issue for me with this lens, my ronin sc can barely handle it. but the quality and sharpness balances it out, plus compared to g master 24-70 price, it might be a better choice in terms of budget.
i want a softer image out of my a7s3 but the black mist filters don't do it for me. Unless i was specifically going for a dreamy sort of a look that supports the story or the mood i feel like they look awkward in talking head videos.
I feel the same! I stopped using those filters a while ago, I recommend looking into vintage lenses! I found the Contax Zeiss lenses to be a good balance of character + sharpness
This lens is great. But people should be aware that the zoom direction is opposite of Sony lenses. I shoot sports and have developed muscle memory with my longer Sony zooms. So when I reach for this lens it really screws me up! Other than that, agreed that it’s a fantastic choice.
Yeah it is! Oh yes I do remember that, definitely would be tricky for some if your kit is saturated with sony lenses, it's kinda the same as the focus direction of Nikon lenses vs others haha, always trips me up but then I get used to it again
Great video man! I use this lens but canon mount and it works great with the sigma MC-11 adapter. One thing I’ve always wondered is if I’m getting extra stabilization since the canon version has OSS. Do you m ow if stabilization is passed through with the sigma mc-11 ?
Thank you! I’m not too sure! With the E mount version, the stabilization / AF is legit perfect so if you ever wanted to go that route it’s a good option Would be interesting to see if Sony reads the OSS through the adapter, but not sure how well it’ll pair with standard or active IBIS
thank ya! for me- the 24-70 is more versatile especially on FF sensors on crop sensors I still love 24-70 bc I often shoot around 24-35 on the lens anyways. On both my fx3 and c70 the 15-35 always felt too wide Just depends on your preference!
Thank you! It’s a solid lens, I haven’t really taken photos with it but I’m sure you’ll have a similar experience to video: fast, accurate AF. With a nice image!
Yeah so those people are referencing the old design! Sigma updated the Sony, not sure about the others. But I haven’t had any dust issues and I’ve had it in heavy winds in the desert tons of times My old 18-35 EF was a dust magnet, but that’s not the case now with the updated design
Don’t think so! Bc Sony has IBIS pretty much in every camera besides FX6 / FX9 Whereas canon stuffed IS into their RF zooms which is convenient as a c70 shooter
@@thomas.kovacik thanks! Yes.. for this exact reason I began looking for alternatives to still get some character but without the contrast reduction BPM gives, I’m currently trying a glimmer glass 1. Would you recommend another filter that maybe you are succeeding in using or have you ditched completely in using them?
@@vannitagliavento yup! I feel that, I haven't picked up that filter in a long time. I've looked into glimmer glass, seems like a solid option. Black satin may be good too. I'm hesitant to buy another one haha. I kinda want to get one for a mattebox if I do
yeah it will! There will naturally be a crop bc of the crop sensor. usually is around 1.5x so this lens will be like a 36-105 FF equivalent, which I think is still great! It's a fantastic lens that you can keep if you do plan on getting FF cameras Not sure what kind of lenses are out there for the crop sensor Sony's, but I personally would buy this lens if I had the fx30
not directly! The new GMII is smaller and lighter If you have the funds, maybe I personally am keeping the sigma bc price and I tend to prefer sigma glass over sony. Sony glass tends to have odd colors a bit
@@PrudhviMitra yeah prob, I prefer the smaller size + aperture ring The sigma is still a really great lens, it's like 99% of the GM. the size / ring is a huge bonus of the GM II. I've had issues with sony lenses in the past where they feel "plastic-y" so not sure if they did anything to fix that
Thanks for the quick response mate…. I am getting the Sony fx30 in a bit and I wanted a lense to pair it with, would you recommend this? I’m a novice who’s learning videography
I would say so! You don’t need 1.4 or 1.2, 2.8 is plenty, but also shooting at longer focal lengths will compress the image, making the background feel bigger. As long as your subject is away from the background you’ll be fine! Focal length is more important than aperture, I always shoot around f/3.5-5.6 anyways
it works, but it's heavy and when you zoom the balance gets thrown off I would balance it around 50/60mm and then zoom about but I'd rather rock the smaller 16-35 pz or something similar in size and weight
No dust issues- they updated the design on the Sony e mount one You’ll be fine! I’ve had mine in crazy wind in the desert, had it caked in dust. Nothing got inside
You are wrong. Main disadvantage is, that the active stabilization does not work with the Sigma. So when you are filming handheld and move forward is it a restriction compared to Sony lenses. In this situation active mode is clearly better.
i think this lens is mid. 24 is not wide enough and 70 is not zoomed in enough. Whatever u want to do imo the 15-55 kit lens can get the job done as just much as the 24-70
I don't really agree! 24 is plenty wide for a "standard wide" 70 definitely isn't enough but it's something haha. I would love it to be 80 / 85 The sigma 24-70 is really smooth, sharp, color accurate and the AF is just as good as the gm lenses. I'm sure you can get the job done on the kit, but if you're looking for top tier performance out of a lens- the sigma 24-70 e is a pretty solid contender
Lens is too heavy with a fully rigged out FX3, colour, and skin tones are not as nice as Sony lenses. AF is not as good as Sony lenses and lags in comparison. We bought two of these lenses and sent them back. We bought all Sony, you get what you pay for. If price is premium on the list of needs then they are the next best thing for an FX6, but for an FX3, the 24-105 Sony is the better lens for all-day run and gun work. The 70mm is just too short without having to resort to clear-image zoom for interviews and close-up details. With the 24-105 mm you get a 157 mm lens truly making this a lens requiring few lens changes, whereas with the Sigma you have to stop and lose valuable time, and opportunities on a doc to make lens changes to achieve longer focal lengths. The Sony is far lighter, significantly lightening your entire rig. Image quality is excellent and the 24-105 is priced far lower than the 28-70mm Sony Gmaster, which is also a heavy lens like the Sigma, and similarly lacks the extended foal range. And it is another lens better suited to a shoulder-mounted FX6.
I had the Sony 24-105, sold it after using for three years and replaced it with Sigma 24-70. Image quality is way better, you get nice bokeh, richer colors and better micro-contrast. The images from 24-105 looks dull in comparison. So much happier with the Sigma.
The lens feels at home fully rigged out on the fx3, and for 1100 its pretty solid! I'm glad you're enjoying the sony lenses, they seem nice! But for most, having a sharp solid lens at 2.8 is more valuable than a 24-105 at f4. I also looked into the 24-105 bc that lens used to be the goat for run n gun. But I feel this new sigma takes the cake. It's not that heavy either when stripped down, I just did a 10mile hike with it and it was pretty mellow. I plan to bring it backpacking. Thanks for your thoughts!
This video just made my mind up. As you have the fx3 with the sigma, so I would have the same set up. going to buy the sigma 24-70mm art lens tomorrow, thanks for the great video bro 💯
yew stoked it helped out! the sigma 24-70 is incredible, you won't be bummed!
Looking forward to getting it 💯
@@thomas.kovacikcan you please confirm if it will work with Sony ZV-E10?
sold my tamron 28-75 and im watching a lot of youtube videos to convince me of getting the sigma 24-70. i think this is one of those videos. thanks!
rad! it's such a solid lens, I love it
Coming from APS-C I was first turned down by the size/weight of this lens. But then I started to use it more and it pretty much replaced all my lenses for some jobs. Now I finally got an FX3 and it's a beast of a combo!
I feel that! this lens is hefty haha, but when it's the only one you bring around it's not too bad!
Just bought it for my A7IV and I'm loving it so far. Shooting a wedding with it this Saturday :)
Love to hear that! Such a solid duo right there
One of my two favorite lens to bring with me, I carry both this and the 14-24mm on all my trips. They’re both pretty heavy but it’s not bad when on is in your hand and the other in the backpack. Its ultra sharp And a pressure to work with. It’s a good alternative to the GM if you want to save money
Love it! that 12-24 art is insaaaane
Yep! gotta love sigma for offering these incredible lenses
You touched on all the important points when considering this lens, I used to own the Sony 24-105, but sold it and purchased the Sigma 24-70 art. I was very happy with the versatility of the 24-105, but wanted a 2.8, and after researching my options I decided on the Sigma 24-70 and can attest to the the superior quality of this lens. I generally like to stay with Sony native lenses, but as this 24-70 was designed specifically (not modified) for Sony, I was confident on it being a good match. Coupled with the Sony 100-400 GM, I now have two lenses that cover a broad range of focus lengths.
How do you find the Sigma in comparison to the 24-105? I'm deciding between those two lenses.
@@max-olson I did miss the extra reach of the 24-105 at first, but with my other lens the Sony 100-400 that I purchased, I think I have the ideal combination. I did a fair amount of research and found that the Sigma 24-70 2.8 was made specifically for Sony e mount and was comparable to the Sony version. I have taken some off the cuff low light shots and have been very pleased with the results. No regrets
@@AdrianW_photo Thanks for the advice!
i know i can always trust ur gear reviews. this vid made me purchase the sigma over the sony gm1. thanks bro!
thanks! it's a great lens forsure, especially for $1,000
This lens has been a dream, the autofocus is bang on every time and I’m loving that I have the option of a sharp image or soften things up. The weight is solid and I honestly prefer it. I don’t think anyone knows how good this setup is unless they’ve shot on a pocket 4K/6k setup haha
It’s insane right? The weight isn’t bad for the majority of scenarios, which makes it easy to keep haha
Oh yeah those pocket rigs were so ridiculous haha
Howd you soften??
diffusion filters primarily! I dont use them anymore though
@@thomas.kovacik so you no longer use the 1/8 pro mist with your 24-70? If not what made you change?
@@carterchiasson yep! Been a longtime since I used one
Got tired of the look
I was debating between this or the cheaper 28-70 Contemporary. This video sold me the Art one. Excellent review.
thank you! both are great options, I felt the 24-70 was better for my needs! 28-70 I would be okay for travel stuff, but it didn't have that richness the art has!
You should get more subs and views. Your videos are good enough and your color grading are beautiful. I found your channel because I'm going to buy Sigma 24-70. Thanks. Keep up the good work.
really appreciate it! thank you for the kind comment
@@thomas.kovacik any color grade tips or preset?
Dude this video was super sweet, just sold me on the lens 1000% Thank you man!
Really appreciate it!
I love the way you created this video
Thank you
Thank you! Glad you enjoyed
Beast of a lens
Big facts
Vs the GM II…I’m confused
Great review. Love your shots you capture as well. Just bought this lens and am so excited
Thank you! Hope you enjoy the lens! It’s a solid option!
Oddly enough I think this convinced me to get the 28-70 for the FX3. I’m mainly going to be using it to film my personal life and CZcams stuff and the size would most likely keep me from pulling it out. 20/1.8 + 28-70/2.8 might be the winner.
Love that combo! That 28-70 has always been enticing, the size / weight is pretty ideal! And paired with the 20, you have a pretty solid set!
@@thomas.kovacik I just bought the FX3 and 20/1.8. With the active crop you basically get up to 24mm if you need some stabilization. Leaning towards this 28-70 as my run and gun, but worried about micro jitters. How is it working out for you? Also, I appreciate this video for clearing up the dust debate 👍🏻
@@sointoyou8153 nice! Ive been rocking standard stabilization for everything recently, it's been working well! It's nice to have that bit of stabilization for the jitters, and not having it crop down
@@thomas.kovacik there’s a new Smallrig compact v mount thingy to put a v mount battery for added weight and ofcors longer run time.. instead of the whole title kit with rods and rails..any thoughts ?
Have heard so much good stuff about this lens. Seems like Sigma has created something special here. I have so many primes in this focal length area, that it makes no sense for me. But I thought about it severeal times. Thanks for the review. You sound like a Sigma ambassador a little bit in the beginning ;)
it's solid! hah, I'm just passionate about things that make sense financially / performance wise for people. No reason to hype up a $2000 lens if a $1100 lens does the same stuff hah
@@thomas.kovacik true words. Maybe at some point I will buy one. Used prices are very good
Thank you I just ordered my sigma 24-70mm I love my Sigma 16mm
love it! you'll enjoy it
This video definitely helped my decision. I plan to travel for my photography so to have something versatile in my bag would minimize how many lenses I’d need to take with me. The GM II is quite expensive, but I think this lens would do.
So rad to hear that!
Yeah this sigma 24-70 is such a solid option! You'll be stoked with it
@@thomas.kovacik waiting for it to be delivered tomorrow 😁
Thank you for validating my most recent impulse buy
hahah incredible, it's a great lens!
Been really looking for details about dust and weather resistance. glad you said about the rubber gasket. thank you very muchfor this well made video 🎉
thanks! yeah you'll be fine as long as you get the newer serials!
@@thomas.kovacik oh interesting. how do we find out if the serials are on the newer end?
Great video! Super high quality work!
appreciate it!
Really helpful video. Thank you! Getting one now!
Thank you! it's a great lens
Nice vid thanks! Subbed.
Thank ya! Glad you enjoyed it
Thank you for a great review! I'm going to get this now! :)
course! You'll be stoked on it
Thanks for detailed review, I'm gonna to buy it today
course! enjoy it, it's a great lens!
Thank you so much for sharing this video with us. It is super cool! God bless you! 😊🔥👍🏼
Thank you! Glad you enjoyed, God bless!
Hi I have 20 mm 1.8 sony lens. Do you think better to sell it and buy sigma 24-70 or keep it and buy sigma 28-70? For now I use 20 mm and 35 1.8 sony apsc. All is really good for doing youtube. But i need to replace apsc lens and to have 70 mm lens to shot.
I've got the DG DN 85mm and 35mm, which I love, but I've only got a one body set up... so I've just ordered this beaut of a lens, just watching reviews until it arrives tomorrow! haha. Great video, thanks for sharing.
Found this at the perfect time. Looking for a lens for my new fx3
Amazing! It’s a great lens, just shot on it all day today and it made my shoot way easier. Shooting all this weekend with it too, it’s solid!
@@thomas.kovacik thank you! I was legit going through same lenses you suggested at the end , was like “do I have to get that g master?” Game changer 🙏🏽
so rad haha, yeah I'm sure the gm lenses are great, especially that gm 2, buuuuut, is it worth twice the price of the sigma? I'd argue no haha, I have no plans to upgrade to one. But if sony ever desides to send me one, sure I'd use it haha. But for now, the sigma keeps me stoked! well worth the 1100
Really a great zoom lens 👍🏻 I have the 28-135 mm Sony f4 for my FX6
it is! I'll have to look into that one!
I habe both, the Sigma 24-70mm and the new Tamron 35-150mm f2.0-2.8, for the most things now I use the 35-150mm, I only put on the 24-70 if I really need the 24mm.
two solid lenses! I'll have to check out that tamron some more! I've been hearing a lot about it
I currently have Tamron 28-75 but this lens is soft at 2.8f. Now i can't decide to buy Sigma 24-70 or Tamron 35-150 for Run and Gun photo & video stuff.
This lens is great! Nice video, but the question that won't go away is: what lens are you using indoors? when you are filming yourself
Thanks! Sony 20 1.8 for the longest time
I have the sony 20-70 f4 now
The weight and size has been the main issue for me with this lens, my ronin sc can barely handle it. but the quality and sharpness balances it out, plus compared to g master 24-70 price, it might be a better choice in terms of budget.
I love my sigma lens. Im looking at the new 70-200 now.
great to hear! it's a solid lens
Really can't go wrong with this lens. Nice review
so true! it's a workhorse
Thanks!
i want a softer image out of my a7s3 but the black mist filters don't do it for me. Unless i was specifically going for a dreamy sort of a look that supports the story or the mood i feel like they look awkward in talking head videos.
I feel the same! I stopped using those filters a while ago, I recommend looking into vintage lenses! I found the Contax Zeiss lenses to be a good balance of character + sharpness
@@thomas.kovacik ok nice i'll look into those
This lens is great. But people should be aware that the zoom direction is opposite of Sony lenses. I shoot sports and have developed muscle memory with my longer Sony zooms. So when I reach for this lens it really screws me up! Other than that, agreed that it’s a fantastic choice.
Yeah it is! Oh yes I do remember that, definitely would be tricky for some if your kit is saturated with sony lenses, it's kinda the same as the focus direction of Nikon lenses vs others haha, always trips me up but then I get used to it again
Great video man! I use this lens but canon mount and it works great with the sigma MC-11 adapter. One thing I’ve always wondered is if I’m getting extra stabilization since the canon version has OSS. Do you m ow if stabilization is passed through with the sigma mc-11 ?
Thank you! I’m not too sure! With the E mount version, the stabilization / AF is legit perfect so if you ever wanted to go that route it’s a good option
Would be interesting to see if Sony reads the OSS through the adapter, but not sure how well it’ll pair with standard or active IBIS
I canimagine this using with an fx30. The crop makes it a 35-105 2.8 it does not get better than this
would be a solid setup! it’s just really heavy haha, that sigma 28-70 is really nice too
Good video bro!! So 24-70mm or 16-35mm? What do you think?
thank ya! for me- the 24-70 is more versatile especially on FF sensors
on crop sensors I still love 24-70 bc I often shoot around 24-35 on the lens anyways. On both my fx3 and c70 the 15-35 always felt too wide
Just depends on your preference!
i love those SIGMA warm and nice COLORS
yeah it really stands out! such a great lens
thx for nice video i think i gonna buy it@@thomas.kovacik
Thank you for your excellent review. Currently i have Sony 50mm F1.4 and Sony 16-35mm F4. Seriously thinking if i should buy this sigma lens.
thanks! yeah that 24-70 is a great addition I'd say, depends on what you do though!
One lens to rule them all
Too true!
I’m getting the a7cii for compactness, I’m still torn between sigma 24-70 Art or the sigma 28-70 with another wider lens
Only lens I own, bad ass
It’s so good! Solid option if you only want to own one lens
What kind of ND filter did you use?
NISI IRND 3 and 6 stop
Great video brother, I’m planning to buy one , what do you think about photography whit this lens I do both video and pictures? Thanks
Thank you! It’s a solid lens, I haven’t really taken photos with it but I’m sure you’ll have a similar experience to video: fast, accurate AF. With a nice image!
@@thomas.kovacik just arrived, thanks brother
When you say you use it as a run and gun, do you put it in a gimbal? A lot of people seem to say it’s too heavy to be put on a gimbal.
nope all handheld! though i know people who throw them on gimbals bc it’s small for a cine camera
@@thomas.kovacik you have any tips on getting smooth shots filming handheld?
yup! i plan on making a video going in depth
@@thomas.kovacikso you don’t shoot on a gimbal ?
@@PrudhviMitra yeah I've only used one with the fx3 twice I believe
Im really concerned about stabilization when shooting video
And i dont wnatvto use gimbal all the times
Does the steadyshot works with it?
Nice movie. Looking into pairing my 24-70 mm sigma with fx30 . Know it’s crops but hope it’s a good combo
thank you!
Yeah that's a great lens to invest into- it'll pair well with the fx30! I loved the rf 24-70 on the canon c70 (s35 sensor)
I’ve been reading a lot of comments on B&H that this lens tends to accumulate dust. Those are mostly Panasonic users. Any input or thoughts?
Yeah so those people are referencing the old design! Sigma updated the Sony, not sure about the others. But I haven’t had any dust issues and I’ve had it in heavy winds in the desert tons of times
My old 18-35 EF was a dust magnet, but that’s not the case now with the updated design
I'm going to buy in 2 day's Sony a7c+ Sigma 24 70 tnx brother 🍻 suggestions
epic! that's going to be a fun kit, have fun!
Do you think the sigma 28-70 would be enough weight for smooth handheld shots on the fx3 without any additional rigging?
It’s a very light lens! I think you could be fine with it
Sigma 24-70 vs sony 24 gm ?
For me, I’d rather have the sigma zoom
Have you noticed a hard time with the autofocus between these too? I feel like this pair has struggled for me.
nope! AF has been perfect on the sigma 24-70 for me
Are there any Full Frame 24-70 lenses that have Image Stabilization at constant 2.8 for E-Mount?
Don’t think so! Bc Sony has IBIS pretty much in every camera besides FX6 / FX9
Whereas canon stuffed IS into their RF zooms which is convenient as a c70 shooter
did you use 1/8 bpm in every shot? Amazing photography, thanks!
I'd say the majority of the clips had it on there! thanks!
I stopped using that filter a while back though! Felt too washed out for me
@@thomas.kovacik thanks! Yes.. for this exact reason I began looking for alternatives to still get some character but without the contrast reduction BPM gives, I’m currently trying a glimmer glass 1. Would you recommend another filter that maybe you are succeeding in using or have you ditched completely in using them?
@@vannitagliavento yup! I feel that, I haven't picked up that filter in a long time. I've looked into glimmer glass, seems like a solid option. Black satin may be good too. I'm hesitant to buy another one haha. I kinda want to get one for a mattebox if I do
Does this lens work well with the SOny FX30. Or what lenses do you resommend for the FX30. Thanks for the video.
yeah it will! There will naturally be a crop bc of the crop sensor. usually is around 1.5x
so this lens will be like a 36-105 FF equivalent, which I think is still great!
It's a fantastic lens that you can keep if you do plan on getting FF cameras
Not sure what kind of lenses are out there for the crop sensor Sony's, but I personally would buy this lens if I had the fx30
@@thomas.kovacik Thanks for the response 💯
Bought the tamron instead. Did I make a mistake?
Depends! Time will tell
Have you compared this to the Sony 24-70mm GM II? If so, what're your thoughts and which lens would you recommend?
not directly! The new GMII is smaller and lighter
If you have the funds, maybe
I personally am keeping the sigma bc price and I tend to prefer sigma glass over sony. Sony glass tends to have odd colors a bit
@@thomas.kovacikwhat someone was willing to gift you the GM II would you leave the sigma ?
@@PrudhviMitra yeah prob, I prefer the smaller size + aperture ring
The sigma is still a really great lens, it's like 99% of the GM. the size / ring is a huge bonus of the GM II.
I've had issues with sony lenses in the past where they feel "plastic-y" so not sure if they did anything to fix that
@@thomas.kovacik would the sigma make more sense for hand held shooting due to the added weight !? Trying to convince my self to get the sigma lol
what is the IBIS performance ;like on this lense?
Pretty solid in standard!
Thanks for the quick response mate…. I am getting the Sony fx30 in a bit and I wanted a lense to pair it with, would you recommend this?
I’m a novice who’s learning videography
Thanks in advance
will the power zoom on the fx3 work on this or any other lenses for Sony?
You can use clear image zoom with any lens, but no PZ
You’ll need a PZ lens like the 16-35 or that 28-135 or something
とてもかわいい娘
Is it good for portraits ? Specially to isolate sub from background?
I would say so! You don’t need 1.4 or 1.2, 2.8 is plenty, but also shooting at longer focal lengths will compress the image, making the background feel bigger. As long as your subject is away from the background you’ll be fine! Focal length is more important than aperture, I always shoot around f/3.5-5.6 anyways
@@thomas.kovacik oh i got it , thanks for the reply man 🙏
Is this also good for produc/food shots?
Yeah depending on what you’re looking for
Is there issue with autofocus on sony cameras,? A73-4-5?
Nope! It’s really good, if anything it’ll be the camera’s fault on the a73 at least
Bro I’m an entry level creator . Did you use a custom lut on this ?
Yup I did! My own slog3 conversion lut
@@thomas.kovacik Bro can i buy it?
@@goodmuszic726 yep! Look on my website, you’ll see it there
Whats the rangefinder thingy at 07:15 called?
It’s a spot meter I think! For finding exposure
what about the stabilization
works well! I heard with non-sony lenses you don't get the same performance out of active. I primarily only use standard and it was solid
I paused in the middle of this video and bought it.
Hah rad! Enjoy it, it’s a great lens especially for that price
help! :) do you have a focus problems with your 24-70 on fx3?
hi! I didn't, but with recent firmware I've been having AF issues overall
@@thomas.kovacik thanks for your reply! you mean with 3.0 firmware on your fx3 or recent firmware of the lens itself? :)
Can we use on full frame camera
Yep! It’s a full frame lens, you can use it on full frame or apsc
Who's the actor at: 2:05?
Sean Hazen!
@sean.hazen on IG
do u recommend for gimlble?
it works, but it's heavy and when you zoom the balance gets thrown off
I would balance it around 50/60mm and then zoom about but I'd rather rock the smaller 16-35 pz or something similar in size and weight
@@thomas.kovacik weight is concern on gimble......thankyou
Great review. Brilliant lens...does what it says on the tin. Very solid ...you can drive a truck over it.
thank you! yeah it's a stellar option forsure
u have dust issued on this time? please answer me. because i want buy this lense but so many people tell about dust issues :(
No dust issues- they updated the design on the Sony e mount one
You’ll be fine!
I’ve had mine in crazy wind in the desert, had it caked in dust. Nothing got inside
did you even watch the video?
If you do whiskey coffee and repeat, you would eventually die.
Crazy hah
Why not get the Samyang 24 to 70 and enjoy naming videos with AUTOFOCUS!
you could! I just have a history with sigma so I trust their product hah
You are wrong. Main disadvantage is, that the active stabilization does not work with the Sigma. So when you are filming handheld and move forward is it a restriction compared to Sony lenses. In this situation active mode is clearly better.
forsure! Yeah I never use active anyways so I probably missed that it wasn't doing something- I always stick to standard
You love it, wanted to sell it, learning to love it again? Lol photographer problems
I shoot video haha
Ended up selling for the sony 24-70 gmii and couldn’t be happier
i think this lens is mid. 24 is not wide enough and 70 is not zoomed in enough. Whatever u want to do imo the 15-55 kit lens can get the job done as just much as the 24-70
I don't really agree! 24 is plenty wide for a "standard wide"
70 definitely isn't enough but it's something haha. I would love it to be 80 / 85
The sigma 24-70 is really smooth, sharp, color accurate and the AF is just as good as the gm lenses. I'm sure you can get the job done on the kit, but if you're looking for top tier performance out of a lens- the sigma 24-70 e is a pretty solid contender
I totally disagree, the 24-70 gm ii is the best
This video was uploaded before that existed
Haven’t gotten my hands on that one yet but I’m sure it’s great
Lens is too heavy with a fully rigged out FX3, colour, and skin tones are not as nice as Sony lenses. AF is not as good as Sony lenses and lags in comparison. We bought two of these lenses and sent them back. We bought all Sony, you get what you pay for. If price is premium on the list of needs then they are the next best thing for an FX6, but for an FX3, the 24-105 Sony is the better lens for all-day run and gun work. The 70mm is just too short without having to resort to clear-image zoom for interviews and close-up details. With the 24-105 mm you get a 157 mm lens truly making this a lens requiring few lens changes, whereas with the Sigma you have to stop and lose valuable time, and opportunities on a doc to make lens changes to achieve longer focal lengths. The Sony is far lighter, significantly lightening your entire rig. Image quality is excellent and the 24-105 is priced far lower than the 28-70mm Sony Gmaster, which is also a heavy lens like the Sigma, and similarly lacks the extended foal range. And it is another lens better suited to a shoulder-mounted FX6.
I had the Sony 24-105, sold it after using for three years and replaced it with Sigma 24-70. Image quality is way better, you get nice bokeh, richer colors and better micro-contrast. The images from 24-105 looks dull in comparison. So much happier with the Sigma.
The lens feels at home fully rigged out on the fx3, and for 1100 its pretty solid! I'm glad you're enjoying the sony lenses, they seem nice! But for most, having a sharp solid lens at 2.8 is more valuable than a 24-105 at f4. I also looked into the 24-105 bc that lens used to be the goat for run n gun. But I feel this new sigma takes the cake. It's not that heavy either when stripped down, I just did a 10mile hike with it and it was pretty mellow. I plan to bring it backpacking. Thanks for your thoughts!