The 2020 Cadillac CT4 is the Brand’s Latest Attempt at a Sport Sedan
Vložit
- čas přidán 8. 07. 2024
- Follow Redline on social channels:
Instagram: / redline_reviews
Facebook: / liketheredline
Tesla referral code: ts.la/sofyan13379
#Cadillac hasn't had the best track record when it comes to a small sport sedan. However, that all changed with the incredibly fun-to-drive ATS back in 2013. Unfortunately, it didn't sell quite as well as Caddy hoped which is why they decided to replace it with the all-new 2020 #CadillacCT4 this year. Built on the same alpha platform as the ATS, the #CT4 is slightly longer and more refined. At the same time, @Cadillac decided to replace the old V6 with a new 450T trim which is powered by a 2.7L turbocharged 4-cylinder engine, while the #CT4V makes its return but with significantly less power than the old #ATSV, for now. - Auta a dopravní prostředky
It’s a luxury vehicle in 2020, by now ALL lighting needs to be LED as standard. No excuses
Exactly
GM loves to be cheap.
Yeah I think I saw a 19/20 plate Mazda 3 not too long ago, had halogen headlights 🤯 it actually cheapens the look of the car from the manufacturer I feel so they’re shooting them selves in the foot 😂
Skull FT weird because is actually one of the manufacturers that does include LEDs as standard. My wife has a 19 Mazda6 touring trim (not top of the line) with full LED lights
CEEJAY dude what are you ranting for? I literally said they should have LED lights as standard. No one mentioned anything about reliability, selling cars or whatever your point is you’re trying to get across.
I think this car is beautiful. People complained when the earlier Caddys had too much bling on the interior. Now they've toned it down too much? You cant satisfy everyone i guess.. Good job Cadillac. I love it. Looking forward to the CT6
Anytime Sofyan says “relatively” that many times you can tell he doesn’t like the car at all lmao. 😂
40 grand out the door is not bad. I thought it was going to be 55 grand, so I am more impressed now.
$40 grand fully loaded I guess that’s not bad worth looking at.
I was gonna agree but then he said this car was 45 out the door.
Wait 45 grand? Hell no id rather look at different cars
any 4-cylinder car for $40k is a "no", in my book.
@@foam27 you are right. I don't buy new cars because of the severe depreciation, I could pick up three amazing vehicles for the price of this thing, probably 4.
@ 4:30 - the hinges actually “don’t” crush the cargo... 🤷🏽♂️
I came here to make the exact same comment....
Just came for this comment. Thank you.
Can't wait for the blackwing
"Cant wait" a strong phrase for a modern Cadillac...
Caddie is trash now
Still too many “that’s good enough” people at Cadillac. Terrible shame.
Compare and price option-to-option the Caddy against another European luxury rival. I guarantee the rival will be substantially more expensive. As a Cadillac owner, trust me... I KNOW Caddy's shortcomings (and they are many). But, the hate is way, way overblown and I'd be curious how many of the haters on the internet have actually driven a (new) cadillac in the past five years.
John Clayton, Exactly!!
They should work at Ford then - because Cadillac is still far ahead of anything Lincoln is putting out
It's Still a MONEY PIT & has been since the 80's; Cost of Repairs and POOR WORKMANSHIP AND MANUFACTURING!
@@stevewierzbicki2495 hardly, caddies are easily on par with the german and japanese brands in build quality. They just aren’t for you anymore old man
Silly Cadillac, we don’t use newton meters here in the U.S.
I think that's kind of the point, since we're unfamiliar all we see is a big number and so Cadillac is banking on people who think a bigger number must mean better.
banstaman 👏👏👏👏
China
It shows too; the value is wrong.
@@nicholassmith7048 they only use multiples of 50. They arent quite as stupid as you think.
I love the styling and it definitely is gonna be fun to drive but as usual GM fails on the interior and final details. This car is what the ATS should have been 5 years ago. I want Cadillac to do better, this is not the Standard of American Luxury. They’re still gonna be playing catch up to the Germans. Even a Kia Stinger makes a better impression than this.
So true The Idle Drive. And the Kia Stinger makes a great impression!
The interior in the CT4 is dull looking compared to to Kia Cadenza.
@@moeschizlac honeslty kias are really nice despite there reputation
What competitor other than a class has a far better interior? 2 series? Please. Tlx? A3? Not really
Sheth Jones it doesn’t compete with the 2 series or A3. It competes with the 3/4 series, A4 and C class. The interiors in each of those is miles ahead of this 🤷🏾♂️
Even though I despise General Motors I will give props to Cadillac for keeping the sedans alive. It must've took alot for Cadillac to keep making sedans but I'm glad they are continuing. And while I'm tired of these turbocharged 4 cylinders I do find this 2.7 turbo 4 very interesting.
Love your Saab
Killed the CT-6 and Blackwing engine though.
@@mfmf100 Yeah I know but they didn't kill their whole lineup like Ford.
@@Stressless2023 Thank you it was definitely worth the trip getting it 😂
Me too, a 2.7 four cylinder from a truck? That's way cooler than a 2.0T in everything else
I actually liked the rear end and the minimalist interior. I will always go for a RWD over any FWD.
Isn’t RWD more dangerous than in FWD in snow?
supershroom164 yes. But honestly, I live in California so I hardly ever have the need to drive in snow.
I really liked the rear end treatment. Dude was hyper critical of the car.
Hip and Cool it’s all subjective but I really liked the rear end and the interior... maybe because I like the simplicity of prior Mercedes Benz and/or Audi
@@JuanCarlosLTO It is indeed subjective, but there was no balance in his critique. His review felt predetermined, not authentic or objective. Seemed bias.
I literally laughed when you were getting into the backseat saying, "holy crap".
I think the G70 is a better car & value than the Caddy. It's also RWD based and comes with a 365 hp engine for around $50K.
We'd have to agree with you on that!
Redline Reviews there’s a we?
Nah ct4v drives way better
The G70's base engine is not the 365 HP V6. Also, I think the G70 would compete with the CT5.
Gold Champagne That’s hard to believe
those hinges very specifically do not "crush onto the cargo" as they are enclosed, they do intrude vs an exterior strut but they don't crush like a cheaper car where the hinges actually do press into the cargo.
I got the 2020 CT4 sport. I freaking love it. The whole design is beautiful. Front end to rear end.
This car screams "rental" to me. I bet I'm gonna see this car in Enterprise's "luxury" fleet.
Screams parts bin chevy rental
Hard to take someone seriously when the profile pic is an asian cartoon
YES!!! I thought the same, it's just not wowing me at all
May surprise you but you can find most luxury cars at rental companies.My last rental at enterprise was a Audi Q7.So that’s not a negative against this car ,furthermore because the reviewer doesn’t like the engine/exhaust sound doesn’t mean that the viewers are in agreement because a like the sound.
@@bobbowie9350 it has almost no parts in common with chevies
The ATS was a great car. I wish they would quit with the alphanumeric nomenclature.
Your mom is a alpha numeric nomenclature
they are going back to names
Yes but Cadillac sucks at naming cars. The Cimarron. The Catera.
@@CalvinHikes they have pretty good concept car names like Evoque and Converj
@@CalvinHikes who cares? Not buying a car based on the name is juvenile
Can’t fathom anyone taking an A class over this.
The steering feel alone makes this car pretty solid.
RWD is a must if you enjoy driving.
And who cares what they call the car?
the iffy gearbox and interior would push me to an A class and the design too though i'd choose a cla if I could
yeah the name whining is just odd. But BMW and MB can abandon the logic of their naming conventions and no one notices or cares. Not buying a car because of the rear badging is one of the silliest things Ive heard.
@@yoink7806 the 10 speed was one of the few things he praised
@@shethjones4494 i think the complaints on cadillacs naming system is that Mercedes n bmw's are based on heritage but Cadillac (and audi too) simply did it to have 'big numbers' which makes no sense. as for the gearbox I've seen other reviewers who despise it and the premise of a gearbox like that just doesn't appeal to me nor will it other buyers.
yoink the new 10 speed is most certainly NOT an “iffy” gearbox.
Love this new style of video so much more! Keep up the good work!
That change in Sofyan's expression at about 22 minutes 31 seconds reminds me a lot of the one I get when I unexpectedly notice a cop in my rear view mirror!
I leased a Jaguar XE supercharged 6 banger and it was an absolute joy to drive. I feel it's probably the most slept on car; unfortunately they got rid of the 6 cylinder in 2020. 50k MSRP but i knocked off 8k off the price.
It’s the 4 cylinder Camaro is what it really is.
With a much better motor.
Yup! Camaro on the Alpha ll platform with a back seat!
Better at 4cyl camaro-ing than the 4cyl camaro? Idts but i mean looks comfier. (2.0 t camaro)
Camaro makes a 4 cyl already
A turbo'd-4 Camero in Cadillac clothes on the alpha trim and a bigger backseat. I see no nothing wrong with this minus the lack of a manual trans.
I think you've been way too harsh on this car. "It doesn't wow me like a mercedes"....."try that in your front wheel drive mercedes", and it looks like a rental car? I think it looks great. It's one of the few brand cars that aren't hideously overstyled.
And YOU'RE THE VERY PERSON WHO ISN'T BUYING THIS EITHER
I agree. A mid-level A-class doesn't stand out any more than this mid-level CT4, and I actually think this car looks a little nicer. The interior on the other hand is a little boring (a 2-tone color scheme might help some instead of the plain charcoal/black color in this one).
Sofyan continues the Redline tradition here of being extremely critical of any car from a non-Asian make. Some things don't change I see.
Damn, take a shot every time Sofyan says “LEDs” 2:16 🤣🤣🤣🤣
It actually seems decent. The 3.6l v6 had timing chain and head gasket problems and the 8 speed was a clunky junker. The 10 speed is a good transmission and the 2.7l seems decent although the pumped in noise is overkill. It seems like Cadillac is learning from past mistakes gradually.
Agreed on the look. Front looks much better than the rear.
Thanks for the solid review, as always!
Always great reviews!
That tail kick though!
Nice video! Can’t wait to see what else your reviewing!
Great video as always!
Very excited for the blackwing love the styling
He really loved the CTS V-Sport, so I’m anxious to see his review of the new CT5-V, which has garnered near universal praise. [not sure what his complaint is about the engine noise...sounded good to me for a 4 cylinder]
Same, it sounds more interesting to me than every other car which has a 2.0T. I want an engine that has a personality!
I prefer the analog speedometer, good job Caddy
22:32 Smile went away so fast I thought a cop showed up🤣
That's what I thought too :D
Oh man I was gonna suggest using that road for some road tests! That’s by far my fav road in the area!
Cadillac changes their model designations, more often than I change my underwear!
You're nasty
ATX Trent 😂😂😂😭😭😭
Someone must’ve pissed in Sofyans Cheerios before this review. He’s laying it on them hard lol.
Yea, seems to forget this is going against the FWD mercs and BMW's which are also cheap feeling inside. But because it's Cadillac, it is highlighted constantly.
@@nsu300zx Yep, he's being biased against American brands. The CLA 35 AMG competes with the CT4 V which is 10-20K cheaper. His model is the standard luxury CT4 model.
This is his standard gm review. Except c8
He spilled tho this car was so meh
Literally
Hi There! Can't wait to see your video for the 2021 VW Atlas SEL PREMIUM with RLINE. That will be interesting.
I love this car. Love this little guy. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, after all. ;)
This review gave me anxiety. All you did was complain.
I like it but the interior needs to be better. After the Escalade and Lyriq, I REFUSE to believe that GM can’t make a luxurious beautiful interior!!!! But in their defense, the CT5 and 4 are probably the last 2 new cadillacs to come with non regular names like the Escalade or Lyriq. But I love the design!
And you would be correct. Cadillac always does dumb shit like this. They'll have a nice exterior, then dumb ass the intetior. It's like they refuse to copy how the Germans do the exterior and interiors well AT THE SAME DAMN TIMEON THE SAME DAMN CAR.
@@DJ_BROBOT You are only going to get so much car for X dollars no matter who makes it. I would rather have a beautiful car with a reliable drive train and a minimalist interior that is comfortable and functional.
Well CT4 and CT5 came before the new Escalade and Lyriq. These new vehicles with nice interiors are pretty much the beginning of Johan de Nysschen era Cadillac. Too bad he's not there anymore.
Escalade starts around 80k. This starts at 33k. Could be one reason this isn't as luxurious
@@DJ_BROBOT like the 2 and 3 series? Those are luxurious?
THE ACTUALLY DID MORE THAN MAKE A ATTEMPT !!! I DROVE ONE AND IT IS A VERY GOOD LUXURY SPORTS SEDAN !!!!
Love the gages I think they look amazing!!
I came here for the “thunk”
I think it's more like the trucks have a car engine
The power of a car engine with the noise and refinement of a truck engine.
Besides the Ecoboost 2.7L V6 being the far superior motor in both truck and car applications, Ford also never tried to pass off the Fusion Sport as a luxury sedan from an aspirational nameplate.
@@flightwriterNG they did but called it an mkz and bored it to 3.0 lol. There identical underneath. Fusion sport with another 1000lbs on this would still best it in a straight line 😂 should've gave it a ten speed
The engine was always going to be in this car. The corvette also has a "truck" engine
@@shethjones4494 That the 2.7L four-banger was "always going to be in this car" speaks to GM's laziness and ineptitude, not its intelligence or shrewd planning.
And there are many, many more differences between the Corvette's 6.2L V8 and the "truck" version than there are between the Silverado-spec 2.7L and this one.
I would very much love to see you review the CT4V sometime soon.
I can’t wait for you to do a review on the Cadillac CT5 Because I’m thinking about buying one I have a CTS 2014 luxury collection V6
i mean you can more or less predict what he will say. Handles well, not as nice as a german car, too expensive for a cadillac, nice but not as good as the CTS-V, no full digital dash, 10.2 in screen not large enough, etc. Oh and Bose is nice but not as good a a german sound system
Aww sad to see so many negatives on Cadillac. I must be one of the few who decided to keep my car 100% American. I got rid of my loved 2015 bmw 428i xdrive gran coupe for a 2019 Cadillac CTS and I absolutely love my Cadillac. I’ve had it a year now and have not 1 regret. The handling, motor, and interior are all plenty good and in my honest opinion the interior of my Cadillac is miles ahead of my bmw now obviously my bmw was aging lol and I don’t review cars daily so I’m not in touch as most these reviewers who drive them daily, but I have no complaints.
I'm with you, Sam! I did the same a few years ago - swapped my MBZ for a Caddy. Never regretted my decision.
"Cadillac is supposed to be the world standard"
It's been like 60 years since that era. How many more decades of decline do we need for Cadillac before we give up on that line?
On top of that, this car screams to do something slightly different, like go hybrid.
Well don't look to Lexua to carry that torch today.
Meanwhile Cadillac has one more refresh of the current ICE vehocles before going BEV. Not many ICE manufacturers can say that today.
they did make a hybrid I believe it ends with something like 2.0 E
@@foam27 Cadillac should be making performance a thing for every powertrain combo. The 2.0E doesn't have that. This is basically destined to be a rental car and it shows in every way.
America does not need more of those stupid wind up cars
@@pontiacGXPfan What's a wind-up car? Do you know how ancient you sound? It's the saddest thing I've read on the internet in the last 20 minutes.
First time I’ve actually preferred the look over some of its competitors, I don’t know why, it’s just gorgeous...
too bad it lacks in so many areas
Very interested in the ct5. Your review of the Camaro SS pushed me to order one!
0-60 in 5.1 seconds, with a 4cyl and weighs more than my Stinger. Not bad!
The Cadillac has more low end torque due to it having a 2.7l engine and it's a rwd instead an awd.
“...agricultural sound...”😂 That's a first!
He says the same thing about the engine in my 2013 veloster and the accent. 😂😂😂
Well, somebody loves the agricultural sound
He's being really harsh. It sounds good
Wow I love this Cadillac did a great job
So the Tesla Model 3 has a $20,000 advantage as it costs the same $50,000 price tag with all the nice options, but saves you that much in gasoline over its life. I am a big Cadillac fan, and own a CTS, but economically and from a performance perspective, Tesla Model 3 beats all the ICE competition.
The problem with the Tesla Model 3 is the crappy interior.
Agreed. I'm not really impressed with Tesla at all. The exterior design on their vehicles are awkward and unattractive, crappy interior (as you mentioned), and here in Vegas Tesla is getting kind of "douchey".
the awful build quality and the fact that people think they're luxury cars sends me
@@XZAKLY99 EXACTLY!!
I disagree, I think Tesla's interior is sleek and minimalist. The leather is plush and comfortable, large screen and autopilot is still the best in the industry. Ride and interior noise could be improved but it's outweighed by the performance, handling and convenience of a full tank every morning.
No, the REAL problem with ALL Tesla's is that they are Vacuums on 4 Wheels. GAME OVER !
Looks like direct competition for the Infiniti Q50 not the A class , screen looks like that of a BMW, the shifter as well.
He complains a lot about the sound - I think it sounds good. Journalists complain when cars make noise and then complain when they are too quiet for being boring
I can't wait to see your CT5 review
Thank god they got rid of that GM bong
4:30 those sure look like hinges with covers so they don't crush your cargo. 🤔
The asymmetry of those two knobs below the touchscreen would bother me every time I sat in that interior.
Joe: Loved the V60 review..who knew...a nice wagon..love the Swedish Fish!,
Love it... Cadillac has lowered their bar so this car that's 1" longer than a 3 series, same size as a C class and an inch shorter than an A4 is supposed to compete with the much cheaper and less refined variants from the other manufacturers.
At one point they were saying the ct4 was going to be smaller than the ats and that sounded great, like a 2 series rival. When your small car is bigger than a 3 series, that's bullshit.
it does have smaller cabin space and trunk space tho. lol
Hahahaha so it went backwards 🤣 ATS was a 3 series rival now the CT4 is a 2 series rival ? Only GM 🤣
I’d rather have a v6 Camry...and it has adaptive cruise control on base model.
And in just a few years the resales about the same.
Lol, it just wouldn't be a redline review without the obligatory "Toyota/Kia is best" comment. Thanks for keep this channel in check.
Yeah, never fails. Pasty/Vanilla americans love their pasty/vanilla Toyonda sedans. Now move on.
Yup! I also prefer V6 to Twin Turbo. MY Toyota has 150K Miles and still running GREAT!
Sounds like someone who owns a Camry and is looking to validate their purchase, am I off the mark? Why else would anyone ever say "I'd rather have a Camry over X?" No one ever says this about any car. Ever. I've seen dishwashers more exciting than a Camry.
I respect your opinion and love your channel. In regards to the sound, that’s the point! What BMW or Audi should snarl?
The CT-4 is a good compact RWD sedan with a strong engine. Cadillac could have given it some more luxury features though. Very interested in the Blackwing version.
Wow, Sofyan, you must have been in a bad mood when you recorded this video! "These hinges that crush onto your cargo" (what? the hinges have their own compartment), rear leg room less than a Honda Civic (what about the CLA @ 27"?). It just seemed that you had already made up your mind before you even started. Anyway, I usually really enjoy your reviews, e.g., your maniacal cackle when accelerating in the C8, great attention to detail and thorough reviews. Maybe we can blame this particular video on COVID...
he should have just passed on the car when Cadillac offered it. The cargo crushing comment was interesting. Also interesting was the comment about the "hard" leather.
I would have to agree with you here. I'm no big fan of Cadillac, but I think the exterior styling and interior design look great and are very class competitive. Normally, I think Sofyan does very objective reviews, but in this case it seemed the Caddy was doomed from the start. The engine sounded fine to me in the video. Maybe in person it is a different experience.
@@desimo147 because its a GM product trying to compete with german rivals
That rear seat legroom is a bummer though. 33 inches for backseats is tiny for the size of this vehicle.
This thing is a complete POS that's why. He was being nice. Go to Raiti and excusesgeese for lies.
I think it sounds good!
Tuners are salivating....bigger displacement 4 cyl gives lots of possibilities. Definitely an option worth considering over the 330i or Alfa.
This channel deserve deserves much more subscribers excellent review as always.
9:38 The queen sis snapped out hunty! “Howeverrrrr” 😂 still love you tho! ❤️
That new exterior is amazing! But that interior is just so “GM” so bland and sad for a luxury car :( Where is that over the top luxury old school Cadillac? On the bright side, that horrendous dashboard with the blue lighting and font is gone.
The only thing i dont like is the sound, but it can be rectified by a simple mod to the intake. This is my next car in V form.
I disagree with your styling opinion. Mercedes design has become very bulbous and unattractive in the A class and Do you really the the BMW 2 series grand coupe looks better? I really feel that many automotive journalists are stuck with thinking Caddy is trash. They do deserve it to some extent, but I think they get criticized on things that get overlooked if the car had a German badge.
I will say I love your channel and enjoy your reviews! Keep up the great work!
I kind of agree... I think this car looks as good as anything else it competes with, but it's still kind of a letdown when you compare certain aspects to the Germans. At least GM seems to have priced it right.
I hate cars with upside down grills.
I have been hearing the exact same comments about Cadillac my entire adult life: "It's a good car and ALMOST as good as the Germans, but not quite." Despite endless $billions GM has spent on Cadillac, they have yet to get it right. This sad CT4 is merely a restyled ATS with a slightly nicer interior. It's not even an all new car. I don't see who the buyer is for this car. The older buyers won't care about the RWD, and won't like the tiny trunk and rough engine. Younger buyers would want either a German car at this price, or a Tesla.
you should go back and check out the C&D 10BEst list in the years when the CTS and CTS-V sport made it. Then see if your assessment is accurate. You should also check out lighting lap and how the CTS V and ATS V performed vs their peers on a track.
I like the looks...better than most
Me too. It doesn't make me say "wow" but it looks almost as nice as anything else it competes with to me.
I like this. I need it in a coupe though. 🚙
In my opinion Audi and Cadillac have the best light designs.
Having lived with C.U.E. for years, it's not the monster people make it out to be when u actually live with it versus briefly testing it.
this thing suppose to go against c class and 3 series as its rwd platform and 4.6 m long
For a second i thought it was registered with NY TLC plates. Id make sure I’m near it every time i summon a uber/lyft haha
Hey Sofyan! Great review as always. I really dont know where Cadillac is going with its sedans. They need to start using Cadillac exclusive engines built for their lineups and they need/MUST build their future sedans with Escalade and Lyriq inspired interiors. I dont know if you've seen the new Cadillac Lyriq EV but that interior is on par with Mercedes from what I seen from their reveal. Looking forward to CT5 review!
you will not find a 100k escalade interior in a 33k entry level car. Ever.
@@shethjones4494 I meant inspired ie interms of its styling not materials necessarily.
I think it’s ridiculous they are branding the CT4 as a A3/A Class competitor when it’s the size of a 3 Series/C Class/A4. Let’s be real this is a 3 Series competitor just like the ATS was.
GM did that because they priced this to mirror the smaller A-class, 2-series, etc.
@@Stressless2023 Yes, that might be true, but also irrelevant. I could buy a Toyota Avalon for this PRICE, but that doesn't make it a competitor. This is a "compact luxury sport sedan". Not subcompact.
This car is a hot 🔥 mass come on Cadillac I've seen KIA cars look more luxurious than the CT4 . I like the out side but interior needs help Cadillac what are you all doing. Just get a whole new team 🤔
Cadillac has their sights set on all EVs by 2030, so they may be putting out less than stellar vehicles until then.
fair and honest review
Thanks for your honesty on this vehicle. I won't be buying one based mostly on your review. Things you were critical over were of importance to me as I will be having people in the back seat and want a bigger power-plant. I didn't like the loud drone, especially for a Cadillac. If I want to hear a grinding noise from the exhaust I'll buy a cat-back Charger. Thank for your video. Dollar for dollar, and performance issues, I'll probably be looking into the Genesis G80.
Outside looks really nice but I really dont like that interior
This vehicle is nice but the interior looks pretty bad. I expect this to be discontinued and replaced by a 2021 CTS.
Until you get inside, yeah.
I agree ☝️
Looks great...the sport with the 19” wheels must look awesome...
Raschaud Farmer They no longer make a Q40 LOL.....
Premium Luxury grade offers a Cinnamon interior. Now suck on that!
For a luxury car, I think a better base engine is a v6. Smoother. I wonder how much power people will squeeze out of that turbo with a tune.
I understand if you don’t like the synthetic sound but it’s better than no sound at all.
Lexus: “here’s the all new IS!”
Cadillac: “this is the all new CT4.”
Audi: “this is the slightly refreshed Q7” 😂
*Slightly ruined Q7
It looks like you mightve seen a cop at 22:30 with how serious you get all of a sudden lol
Cadillac is not trying to copy the Germans approach with sedans anymore, they are pricing these well below the German competitors and doing their own thing now. It will be successful and the CT4/CT5 will sell well.
After all these years and GM still can’t make a refined 4 cylinder.
717 flyer Achilles heel for sure. The turbo fours from BMW and Audi, among others, put this thing to shame.
Chevy got a good 4 banger in their Malibu 🤷🏽♂️. And dude unless you driven this car you can’t really know for sure if it’s bad by watching one guy talk about it
TTAMC C. Literally some of the worst 4 bangers in the industry, oil consumption,timing chain failures, pre ignition etc.
ryding with ryan well looking at my profile pic and how I described it I haven’t had a single list of the issues you claimed
TTAMC C. Awesome man, I really hope it treats you well. Oil changes every 3-5k will go a long way with most engines.
Instant like 🔥👍
I think the car is great for what role it's supposed to fill, which is an entry to the caddy family at a lower price range. It missing a few bells and whistles here and there should be expected for what it is overall the great looking car, fast and clean interior.
At first I thought the exterior styling looked really nice!
Then I saw the back end......
CT-6 = Fleetwood
XTS = Devil LE
CT-5 = CTS = STS = Seville
CT-4 = Catera = Cimarron = Calais
Kinda brutal - and wrong - on the last one?
@@danielgolus4600 Probably so. More apt would be CT-4 = ATS