How To Deal With a Bad Neighbour Early! EU Advanced Meta
Vložit
- čas přidán 7. 09. 2024
- FreePete YT ► / @freepete
Twitch ► / thekillpetestrategy
Discord ► / discord
Instagram ► / thekillpetestrategy
TikTok ► / thekillpetestrategy
Patreon ► / thekillpetestrategy
For Business & Sponsorship Inquiries Email: thekpsmgmt@gmail.com
I am so grateful for your time, attention, support and kindness!
Donations are never expected and always appreciated. Thank you!
#Risk #RiskStrategy #RiskGlobalDomination #boardgames
These European Capital games are my favorite
Right on!
That's why I'm doing it more often
Thanks for the great content and the Blue player deserved to lose his Cap if he leaves it so weak and over extends
I recently said I didn't like caps that much I'd have to say the last few were very pleasurable to watch indeed !
I like them the best too. The strategy and Pete hunting the capitals is very entertaining to hear him talk through the process.
Agree
Pete we had a party that wanted to vote online for every issue in the Netherlands , the problem is that most people aren’t informed well and a lot of people won’t vote which leads to only the extremist voting.
Btw I also recommend looking into the Dutch system. It does fix a lot of the issues the two party system has. Everyone can start their own party without needing a lot of money and even if they only get some votes, they can still join the coalition and get some of their points through, this way even a small group has a voice. Can’t explain the whole system here but there are youtube videos on it. Its definitely not a perfect system but if you’re looking for a better system this could be a start
Hi Pete, Love the risk. Don't always love the Politics. Super respect that this content and commentary exists on Free Pete, vs the Kill Pete Strategy, and understand the difference between what you are doing on both channels. Keep on doing you. I appreciate you.
Right on man. Exactly! Trying to make something for everybody!
Yeah, Pete hates cultural differences and thinks open borders and mindless, monolithic mob rule is the way to go.
"Pete do you like salt and vinegar chips?" LOL. After a long stretch of serious philosophy talk I actually laughed out loud. Love it. Thanks Pete.
Now THIS is a video I needed. I always find myself struggling when someone goes bad neighbor right away
Good stuff!
Pete I feel like we are brothers. Philosophy and psychology double major in college with a huge interest in history (originally wanted to be history teacher) and I love my board games. I find it difficult to share my interests with other people because most people don’t like the stuff I like.
Glad to hear you talk about it.
Mario, a response to "most people don’t like the stuff I like." Most tend to shy away from conflict topic's, because to be able to effectively communicate either side of a position, requires a level of knowledge most don't take the time to develop.
I have an amazing opportunity with this work to connect with brilliant people all over the world.
We are all brothers.
I have no desire to push a label upon you but you have done a fantastic job of outlining anarchist principles throughout this entire video. Huge fan.
24:40 "my favorite fruit is watermelon" *closes video angrily* 😂
You don't like watermelon?!?
I really appreciate your take that you don't want people to think like you, you want them to identify the truth and determine whether you sufficiently identify and represent that or not.
Much love, Pete.
I love vids like this. I agree with some things you say and totally disagree with others, but always feel like I get to the end of the vid with a broader perspective on the world around me after having heard your take on things. Thanks so much bro
🙏it's an honour to be able to do this work and connect with so many different people. We're never going to agree on everything and that's totally ok. As long as we can get along and disagree productively.
Absolutely love not only your risk content but also your phylisophical discussions so much. It really gives perspective
hey pete. i think like you and i know exactly where you’re coming from
those are the moments where we truly feel ecstasy
One thing about that bill c16, from what I’ve read there is no part of the bill that enforces gender pronouns as compelled speech, all it seems to do is protect non binary and trans people from incitements of violence and prevent discrimination based on gender identity in the workforce which is great imo.
Exactly!
I'm not Canadian but is it the same version as the one 5 or 6 years back. I ask because if your interpretation was correct the the whole issues with jordan peterson wouldn't have been a thing and his point could have been dismissed as not valid compelled speech.
Bills that fail or get kick back do get adjusted or changed to pass and that might be what your reading if your correct.
Without reading the legislation I am agnostic to it. I don't necessarily trust anyone's opinion on this second hand.
@@danratcliff5353 I'm not Canadian either so I'm just going based off what I've read online but I did some research into it and read the exact legislation and not one bit of it says anything about compelled speech in regards to pronouns. As Pete said in his stream I think if a trans or non binary person asks you to use their preferred pronouns I think it's only polite and decent to use them even if you don't agree but the idea of enforcing speech is quite scary. I'm not quite sure how JP got the idea it was this but maybe I'm missing something
@@therealclp7488 also the information I read was all a couple years old and stone was in reference to the JP situation, if you'd like me to link it I can.
43:29 those rolls
Couldn’t agree more with you Pete about politics our US constitution says Congress shall have the CONSENT of the governed unfortunately it is the other way around our only recourse IMO is either to have short term limits and longer term resets or to always vote out the incumbent
Complete agreement that the most important part of politics isn't the individual parties, but the system in which the votes are cast. It's a major issue with how the US voting system works. As a president can be elected with only 22% of the popular vote. Not even counting a "super delegate" vote swapping. We really need to push to update the way our elections are handled.
Yes! The conversation around systems design is very much the type of thing I'm here for
Pete, I can’t express how much these videos mean to me. They bring me so much joy in my mundane world
It is my honour 🙏
I haven't voted in a decade and i immediately get people stumped when i ask them 1st of all if their candidate even won, and if they won, did they achieve a satisfactory amount of their promised goals? The answer is always not satisfactory for them. The average person always loses the exchange while politicians get a slice of the pie as a reward for voting for the corporate machine. Amazon doesn't care who's in office, so long as you buy their products.
🤣🤣 yeah man. But at least we're 'free' to choose between nothing
Great video. Electoral reform is a really important issue, nice to hear you talk about it. And anti-Nationalism. In the country I’m from, there are rumblings of community assemblies. I think that would be wonderful, as well as removing the royal family from our political system.
Someone has to talk about it, but my voice is tiny.
Albeit not as tiny as it used to.
I like when you have dialogue like this Pete. A lot of philosopher people stick to read books and many working people stick to not thinking to hard. Both can learn a lot from each other, make each other more balanced humans. A thinking working populous are some of the traits ancient athenians wanted within their voting citizens. An curious and mentally fortified common people could come together and make those reforms happen in time. Or I am young and far too optimistic.
I definitely aspire to be the most balanced person I can. And I totally agree the way academic philosophy is taught I find mostly exhausting. What is the essence of the idea and why does that matter? That's what I choose to focus on.
I would pay big bucks for JP to join Pete for a live stream and talk philosophy
As would I
He is not cheap. 😂 Need more Risk takers to support 😁🤞
JP is a good man. Such a joke what Canada has become.
I really enjoyed the philosophical debate about politics. I agree that the political system is broken. In the UK we have a 2 party system (Conservatives, Right, Labour, Left). There isn't much difference between the 2 parties. It just seesaws between the Conservatives and Labour giving the illusion that we have a democracy. My guess is that there is a powerful business elite behind the scenes who are the real puppet masters. How we can change the political system is an interesting question. The balance of power is shifting faster and faster to the 0.ooo1%.
I just found out about this game and i liked it and your gameplay. But what I am really interested in is this kind of thoughtful conversations, so this video is just great. Watching gameplay and also thinking about different concepts? Sure, give me two(or even more, i won't complain)
It's what my mind loves to do. I'm glad it speaks to you as well.
In the American two party system there’s a clear insensitive for the two parties to resist electoral reform. So instead of electoral reform perhaps campaign finance reform could be a more possible solution? No private funding for elections, limit the campaign cycle like they do abroad and all elections are funded solely by the state. Thoughts?
How would campaign finance reform get on the table?
By asking those who's campaigns have been financed? You see my point...
@@FreePete I see your point, then perhaps the most viable path forward is the hard push for ballot initiatives for ranked choice voting. It’s been slow, but it’s gaining momentum in local elections. The more I think about it the better it sounds. It’s not a left or right initiative, purely bettering our electoral system to allow outsider candidates.
I respect you and your open-minded discussions on law, philosophy and kindness.
I'm naturally a very open person so it comes easy
6:57 thank you for sharing your beliefs. its nice to know more about you
I agree non voting makes sense when there are 2 solid parties, maybe 3. But in some countries there are 20 parties or more who run elections and 8 with a chance of winning, so ofc those countries need electoral reform, but in the meantime each vote matters A LOT.
As long as you feel it's meaningful to you then it is. I'm not here to tell you what to believe. It doesn't feel meaningful to me. It feels like I'm lying to myself
@@FreePete Do what you feel best, in my country many times national elections have been down to less than 50k votes. (30+ million people country) because we have a lot of parties.
So i do feel my vote counts.
@@celdur4635 my vote counts too. I get to choose the colour of the object shoved up my backside.
1:25
"White and I can be either the best friends in the world or the worst enemies you've ever seen"
*Looks at video title*
Hoo boy
😈😈😈
Regarding the ‘compelled speech’ the Canadian law just makes it harassment to purposefully, repeatedly, and maliciously refer to somebody by other than their preferred pronouns.
So its just an anti-harassment law, so you can’t maliciously and repeatedly misgender somebody in the same way that you can’t go and insult somebody endlessly.
so they tell me
I find it hilarious how he goes “supporting the system by voting leads to issues. I probably won’t break him to let him get Into a war”
I would apply game theory to my politics if I had any amount of power. Trying to operate from zero power makes it a non game
Thanks Pete. Much love from Malaysia.
Ur content but especially ur positivity in life is great.
No other way to be!
"The most important political issue is not marijuana, not gay marriage, not climate change, not income inequality or all of the other smokescreens the powers that be have used to distract you from the fact that the most important thing that matters to you politically as a citizen is the structure that which you are governed."
Yeah man! I stand by this.
Kinda late to the converstation Pete. I feel you make an interesting point about how there is no conversation about electoral reform, or at least it is small. I would love for you to flesh out your solutions to the problem.
I feel the US political system is intentionally frustrating so it takes a lot to make change happen. Part of this frustration comes from the division of powers to keep the power among numbers of people and not small groups. This is with good reason, large changes come with large consequences. This system is designed to take a lot of effort to make notable change. The idea of everyone having immediate involvement in goverment kind of scares me. The pace of goverment will move much more rapidly, possibly outpacing the time it takes to come to reasonable conclusions. What if people are acting out of their prejudices, or they are convinced by media or industry? I feel the danger of making erroneous decisions is there.
I would love to hear counterpoints. Ultimately Pete, I think you should discuss structure, what ideas do you have for a better system. What holds the system in place? Interesting discussion.
I would like to see a transition towards eliminating representative democracy and the implementation of digital direct democracy. The only way we free ourselves from the oligarchy of business power is eliminating the jobs of political representatives who not only don't represent their constituents but also can't on a structural level.
One day I'm gonna get a practice game with Pete lol
Thanks for all the content you make and this great tourney
Oh also Pete, what's the program you use for the arrows/circles? Need to download that
I'm sure we will frosty.
The program is called screen market and recorder app
Good game. Loved the chat! I agree. Old system broke. New system needed!
❤️❤️❤️
Oh my...a very useful potential solution to the early bad neighbor, combined with political terminology. We're all somewhat different; and have a right to be different...so far. All I want is to be king for 4 days. I could be a great administrator for the world. I'm sure I'd piss some people off, but gas would be a lot cheaper!
3:22 There is required speech in the comen law of the uk, your honer, sir pete. In legal ways, as well as scientific speech. free speech is only for individual persons in private settings unlimited. You can't insite violence or crimes. you can say you disagree with things, but can't say things that have the consequence of harm upon another once reputation without any reason.
But yes, it is a small thing to do individually, but huge if they force their way of speaking the only way. What if you make a mistake? straight to jail.
Hey Pete! Just curious, but you've said in other videos/streams you're a "philosopher by education/trade" (or some variation). Where did you go to school? I assume you're degree is in philosophy? Any particular concentration or was it more of a general study? I ask because I'm about to start the 2nd year of a Master's degree in Medical Ethics, and minored in Philosophy in undergrad. I love talking about this philosophy/ethics and was just curious what your exact background was. As always, love the work/content you put out. Much love from the Midwest!
I have a BA in Philosophy from University of Toronto and York University. I didn't find the focus paid in academic philosophy to be practical enough for my tastes so I didn't proceed past undergrad. I've been self employed my entire adult life so I have business experience instead. Medical ethics is a fun one!
Just to add to the political system discussion: in Europe we’ve had some bouts with direct democracy (referendum) with a few issues, best example is the Brexit. Not to sound to elitist, but a lot of people really don’t know how to vote (they are scared, easily distracted from main issues). I truly believe direct democracies would be a bad solution.
And to be quite honest, democracies like the one in the Netherlands are a good example of a multi-party system that actually gets things done in a matter that is pretty representative. It requires actual representation from citizens while maintaining a layer of career politicians just below the governing bodies that is largely non-affiliated but are actual professionals in their field. It would be great if we could somehow use the same system on a larger scale, but I’m worried we will only get this far if there is ever a substantial and direct threat to our existence. As per the plot of Watchmen 😂
Your thoughts are interesting to me. I strongly disagree with your worldview, but love hearing your perspective and greatly appreciate the insight. Love you Pete!
Doesn’t hurt that the risk play is also very fun to watch.
What part of my worldview? I'm so curious
@@FreePete I think you have started before you are coming from an Atheistic/Agnostic worldview or at the very least a-religious. I would guess politically you are left of center, but also limited government/anti-establishment/populist.
I like hearing from you because it makes me think. It’s a unique perspective, and very different from my own Christian, trad-con, view of the world. I would love to have a long form discussion about anything with you. Can’t possibly be a boring conversation.
That and you’re a Canadian, and everyone knows Canadians are the funnest people to hang out with…
You can still participate in the voting process whilst not buying into that process. Seeking changes through the existing political-legal paradigm and through methods outside of it are not mutually exclusive.
I believe the current process is illegitimate. If I was able to vote for a candidate that I felt would effect meaningful change on something I cared about then the action would not feel dishonest. It currently feels like a non-choice.
@@FreePete the neo-liberal consensus having a stranglehold on the politics of almost every "western" nation is a downer, for sure. Particularly when the powers that be have built a self-reinforcing media, regulatoratory, and political systems to ensure that nothing ever fundamentally changes to upset the status quo.
i think the best and easiest to change that view in America is that politicians must show all there donors both in people and companies. as it is the shadiest thing in america as well as term limits. which has a 93% approval rating but they will never vote to limit their power
I'm more on the belief that those folks should be out of a job and we should be more empowered to choose for ourselves
Oh nice I need tacs for this...
So far I employ a strict standards of good neighbour and basically throw my game to end yours if you don't let me hold.
M.A.D
GG Pete mate 👍
We love the philosophical discussion keep it up
It's my favourite thing to do
It's interesting to me. keep it up...Nice game as well!
Thank you 👍
Well said on the difference between being forced to say a certain things by your government vs saying nice things to your friends.
yeeeeaaaah meta settings are the best!!!!
Saying that there is this massive economic disparity and thats wrong and needs to be fixed is dangerous. Countries that have tried to be economically "equal" in the past have been socialist (aka communist) countries where everyone was poor regardless of their job and how hard they worked. If someone is upset about their financial situation in the States, (not a Canadian but imagine its the same) there is nothing stopping you from working hard and earning more money. Government has no place in taking peoples money just to give it to other people because they want nice things.
In the Rawlsian sense of the decent minimum. Not in the Marxist utopian sense of equality of outcome
Nice Pete!
Awesome video Pete. I can watch you talk philosophy while beating the living shit out of people on meta euro caps all day 😂
Fantastic. That's fun for me too!
Dude!! 👍
I'll take my sl4very with a side order of smugly feeling like I'm on the good side, thanks 👍
Hehehe
I also don't vote (I'm 43, voted once in a local election to give support to a young guy who had zero chance of getting even 1% just cos he said he doesn't know what happens behind closed doors but he will try his best blah blah, it was just symbolic for myself to adhere to my belief that I would vote if I had an honest option to choose. .
My reason is basically the same as yours for not voting but I describe it differently....
Basically if you force me to vote for Stalin or moustache man I refuse to play.
Liar 1 or liar 2 I'd not an option.
Barrel to my head? Yeah FU I still refuse, with gusto..
For me it's a principle based decision from my dislike of bullies.
But expanded more it basically as you say, broken system can not be fixed by playing along.
Kinda only leaves the unpleasant side of revolution but I'm optimistic there are good people who want change without just continuing the cycle of the revolution leaders who win being just as bad as the outed guys lol.
GG Pete like love your vids 👍
Liar one vs liar two. I'm going to use that. It's clean and succinct
Mr streamer sounding more and more like Hank Scorpio
Hahaha I should be so lucky!
Aw I missed the stream I was looking forward to it. Guess there's always the next one
I'm going to make these more often now
"How Pete Takes Over the World and Why it is a Good Idea" - Imagine tho
oh boy... no thank you
Regarding free speech, I'd like to invite a conversation around something that I personally find irritating 😂 when you shorthand words like situation to "sitch" and trouble to "trubs" my soul truly aches.
With the intention of not simply criticising, I'd like your take on why this occurs. Is it common slang that I'm not aware of? As my default thought is that it's just a bit lazy and to the detriment of our language moving forward.
Much love always and thanks for the content xo
I genuinely cracked up at 32:40 when you abbreviated bonus to bone 😂😂 a little poetic justice after my comment. Well played sir. Pete is the Oracle
When I took linguistics back in school we learned that the primary mechanism for language evolution is human laziness. So the thing you're noticing and find yourself annoyed by is actually fundamental to the structure of how all languages function.
finally started playing thew game after so having your videos and JJs as background noise lol
life is beautiful
Agreed! 😻😻😻
I want to know how many other people "misclick" on these videos thinking you're clicking on prompts in game. Because I do....a lot!
I don't see any good reason why we can't have take backs as long as we have the clock and the game state hadn't changed.
Regarding Not voting: I'm absolutely convinced that it is better to vote for the least bad of all choices then not voting. Otherwise you strengthen the even worse choice indirectly. But anyway I am with you that the political system with 2 parties is a total crap and no true democracy. You should have real choices between real alternatives. That you have in most European countries like e.g. mine, Germany. I really don't like some of the "alternatives" we have here (the extreme right got really strong in many european countries last years) but you see a change. Your vote has a visible impact. But don't expect to have much better govemments then. The extreme parties mostly on right wing some on left wing are not doing a better job mostly even worse. What we lack is not change in political system but a change in peoples education. The majority of people unfortunately is to dumb, egoistic and fearful for our complex world. Maybe we are am underdeveloped species for the world we created.
Buying into a system you disagree with is still a form of tacit consent to that mandate of governance. I can't do it because I find the act inherently dishonest.
@@FreePete You are part of the system whether you vote or not. And the people that are not voting are best for the system, they then don't have to care about them because they are not relevant for them to stay in power. But I can understand if you don't want to vote for something you can't subscribe to. I see it the same as you this binary choice between two sides that are basically the same in 80% of the politics sucks.
@@Rorimac67 I accept the ultimate conclusion of this as well. Since we are a part of a system we can't escape, we can't control and we can't even meaningfully improve. How is this different than being a slave?
Hey Pete, if your still paying attention to comments on older videos, what’s your opinion on the political concept of anarchism and also from more of a philosophy take. Possibly misconstrued your takes but they seem to allign to some anarchism takes, however like yourself I don’t like being put into any group so I understand if you don’t agree with the whole concept of anarchism. Please and thanks
People often have suggested that I fit the description
I’ve heard this incident with brutal be mentioned by jj and co and now here, will there be a video on it at some point?
Why would I want to put my spotlight and attention on liars in this community?
One of my biggest missions is to grow the game and show the fun that's possible in this community. Paying attention to bad-actors seems to promote the opposite.
@@FreePete that's completely understandable, I've heard contrasting opinions on it and I've been shocked by how many high level players in risk seem to think that breaking deals as soon as a more beneficial option comes along is firstly not just completely going against your word but also just not in the spirit of the game.
"De jure" is Latin phrase, it's pronounced "de yoo-reh", not "de zhur". :)
I doubt you’ll respond since this is over a week old now but how reconcile your “we should all love each other” philosophy with your non-voting stance. To me they seem quite contradictory, since some political groups seem hell bent on “eradicating” (their words) specific groups.
Like, I hate the current system, but when I hear one party talk about and actually implement horrific things (see genital inspection in Kansas, Florida/Texas kidnapping children), I feel like I am compelled to vote for the other party. Not voting just seems complicit in it all, and contradicts (imo) the “everyone be friends” doctrine.
Idk I would love to hear your explanation.
The simple explanation is that I don't see any side as meaningfully different. I don't think my vote matters at all in a long term material sense. I think if I'm being honest with myself that we are all a slave of this system and up to and including the moment that change of the system on a structural level is part of the discussion there is no point in me lying to myself and pretending my action of voting matters.
You call this **Late** game? I was in a Europe Advanced Caps Progressive game where we had thousands, literally something like 2-4k Caps with sets coming in at 400 a time. It was NUTS.
The vast majority of meta settings games I play don't stalemate
Who's going to break it to Kylted that sausage is not a meat but is in fact, a recipe 😂
He loves it too much to think clearly on the topic.
How come you did not card block blue early on? Was it to prevent other players from knowing they were in one location? Awesome video as per usual!
Edit: as soon as I posted this comment blue took a card elsewhere... 😂😂😂
I mean, while meaningful positive change can't happen within the current framework, meaningful negative change /can/
In addition to that, local politics /do/ have a large impact, at least where I am
But of course, electoralism is only one small portion of a larger engagement
Like, yeah, we voted out the councilman who ordered cops to soak the homeless in ice water in winter, but also we helped save their lives in the meantime
The idea that political engagement is unimpactful feels like missing the trees for the forest, when I can point to one tree that's saved my local community center for the last decade
Like, sure; we're building toward greater change
But it feels strange to not contest the bullshit down the street, be it ballot or direct
Yo Crazy. Kylted is in here
It's doggy time
I gotta say though, I disagree with this notion that we are living enslaved. Compared to what? Peak utopian humanity? Or maybe being literally owned my another individual? This idea that we can be objectively free, I find naive. Freedom is something you can only obtain for yourself internally. It is a solely subjective state of being, one that every individual must decide for themselves. Because the fact is economically, you and I are living in the lap of luxury and comfort from an historic perspective, yet there are people's and cultures on earth today who live in abject poverty who live far happier lives than us. I would go so far as to say that if this is slavery, then I don't want to be free. I eat my fill everyday, and get as much entertainment I want daily. I have many loved ones, who enrich my life, and who give my life warmth and meaning. And sure I have to go to work everyday to pay for things, but I'd have to work (and harder) in any human society, with or without money or government.
The way I mean enslaved is relative to a narrative that is not constrained by the insistence that the status quo is the only possible option.
@@FreePete TL:DR I'm a willing slave.
Oh I see. Enslaved by a particular political dogma. Or I guess in the case of the west, a particular political binary. That makes sense. I suppose that it is fairly annoying, but I have found that simply by shutting off the incessant background noise of the politics, I live a happier life. I used to listen to political pundits a lot and as a result I was just angrier and argued with my wife a lot. Once I stopped listening, my marriage was happier and my anger levels subsided. If someone can be in it and not jeopardize their happiness and relationships, then I guess have at it, but it's just not something I can do and stay mentally healthy.
Thanks for responding Pete. I do love your commentary outside of Risk, even if the game is what we are mainly all here for.
Hi Pete,
Just curious, what are your thoughts on JBP?
🤣
We can agree to disagree but not voting is a choice in my opinion a really bad one. We dont live in a utopian society obviously, the only change can come from within… ie voting
On a feeling level it's dishonest for me. I can't pretend to act in a way that isn't meaningful just because it's the thing people are doing. I've always been this was and it's definitely made me unpopular in certain circumstances.
I understand that for you it may feel meaningful, and good for you, I'm envious of that somewhat. But I can't lie to myself.
@@FreePete I completely respect your honesty and willingness to express your thoughts especially in this day and age. Keep up the great content and keep people thinking critically! P. S. fuck fascism and fuck trump too
So you operate in your democracy like it were a monarchy?
Your vote is your power to make a change for the better, if you don't like the options make sure to tell them that, tell them what you want to see and find if anyone is willing to give you that.
That being said sometimes it may be wiser to vote for the lesser of 2 evils, but make sure to tell their campaign about what you want them to do, and that you aren't going to tolerate their other nonsense.
I suppose the bit about my vote being my power to make a change is the part I'm trying to have a discussion about. I do not currently feel that is true.
You guys come here to watch Pete play risk?
I come here for the political/philosophical rants and discussions
whatever tickles your pickle!
Immanuel Kants german is sometimes difficult to understand, even for me a native german speaker lol
I figured. It's very technical right?
@@FreePete for sure
technical in the sense of 40 words per sentence for a specialized topic plus a rather fancy way of writing...
@@Michi-vk4um yes. I would be the last person to criticise Kant on his style.
11:37 why do you feel like we are enslaved?
In the sense that it only appears that we are free to choose but our available choices are within a subset of possible ones.
So in short be calm and let others fight
A good rule for free for all
Maybe I should start reading german philosophers I don't have to translate them. And I am better in reading then talking anyway. 😂
If it speaks to you!
You remind me of Stefan Molyneux a little.
Is this a good thing or a bad thing?
Based off that response to the preferred pronoun question: I think Pete really likes JP
He has a lot of good to offer.
Everyone should like JP.
Came for the Risk, stayed for the philosophy
🙏🙏🙏 trying my best sir
Tickle
Oh boy🙀🙀
I think your political solutions are too mired in your philosophy background and not rooted enough in history. Real systemic change is very difficult and tends to come after either a violent revolution (which trends negative change ultimately) OR through coalition-building working with established political institutions. In the United States, the greatest systemic changes have resulted from coalition-building working within political institutions. Look at the Progressive reforms of the late 19th/early 20th century. Now, conservative Americans are trying to walk back from those institutional reforms using gerrymandering and the courts with mixed success. If you want to see representation change, you have to work to build a coalition. The best way to do this is through political discourse and voting.
I definitely don't want to live throught the violent revolution.
I'm thinking something of a proof of concept like the 'cell phone party' I talk about to show the advantage of distributed decision making on a grass roots level
I absolutely thought the way you do on voting, till Trump and MAGA came along
Pete, why do you dislike Jordan Peterson?
Please educate yourselves and vote. Absolutely ridiculous
I choose the purple coloured piece of poo.
Why is my world still shitty? I guess I blame myself for the choice.
absolutely ridiculous is not an argument
@@FreePete This wasn’t an argument for you. It was a plea to the audience
Like your risk, don't like your politics.
🤣🤣🤣
You sound like you would be a good socialist, but you don't want to identify with it because of the misleading red scare.