Short field Take Off, Turbo Zenith 801

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 9. 10. 2008
  • Now that we finally got the fuel flows right this is our shortest take offs yet. We still have not had a chance to get down anywhere near sea level altitudes to see how she does in some thick air.
  • Auta a dopravní prostředky

Komentáře • 49

  • @davidrobins4025
    @davidrobins4025 Před 3 lety +1

    Mark, thanks for building this one and for sharing it with us. It is very satisfying to work that hard and get more than you expected. Congratulations.

  • @801pilot
    @801pilot  Před 13 lety +7

    It's a Turbocharged Lycoming io-360 with intercooler. Makes 220 hp for takeoff and 180 max continuous.

  • @801pilot
    @801pilot  Před 16 lety +2

    There are no good kits available. I looked forever and finally spent a fortune developing it myself. Besides increased performance I wanted the lowest possible weight increase and needed it to fit inside a tight cowling. I am VERY HAPPY with the results! Post turbo performance far exceeds any hopes or expectations. It's an entirely new airplane! If others are interested I'm considering building 10-20 kits to be used on any Lycoming based 320 or 360. RV builders/owners should love it too,I hope?

    • @beunbad
      @beunbad Před 2 lety

      Wow that sounds awesome! Is the kits or will you build them too! What’s included in them?

  • @driller189
    @driller189 Před 14 lety +1

    That is awesome performance for a 4 seat aircraft!

  • @4schitzangiggles
    @4schitzangiggles Před 5 lety +1

    I love this video. I'm working on funding for a 701 or a 750sd, first one is most likely going to be the 701

  • @gyroplanefdk
    @gyroplanefdk Před 13 lety +1

    Insane! Great Build

  • @801pilot
    @801pilot  Před 16 lety +3

    I used a RayJay turbo with a custom exhaust and inter-cooler.

  • @sslusshy
    @sslusshy Před 15 lety +1

    I so am going to buy and build one of these. awesome!

  • @notpoliticallycorrect
    @notpoliticallycorrect Před 3 lety

    So excellent!

  • @FSX404
    @FSX404 Před 15 lety +1

    This one is the second shortest one I've seen, there is one of those Piper Cubs used on farmlands here on youtube which takes off from a complete stop (though they probably had 20-30 kts headwinds I'm guessing).

  • @archon888
    @archon888 Před 7 lety +1

    Fantastic!

  • @JustPlaneChris
    @JustPlaneChris Před 14 lety +1

    This is an experimental aircraft. He can mount a camera wherever he wants to, and doesn't have to tell anyone. :)

  • @aval1998
    @aval1998 Před 11 lety +1

    that's one heck of a STOL you have there. I'am considering about getting one of these when i get my license

  • @beunbad
    @beunbad Před 2 lety

    Wow I like these 801’s better than the 750 super duties!

  • @801pilot
    @801pilot  Před 15 lety +2

    This is the 4 seater, it does not have folding wings like the two seater.

  • @801pilot
    @801pilot  Před 14 lety +2

    Yes it really has a turbo. I used a Ray-jay turbo with intercooler. The engine is a Lycoming IO-360

    • @beunbad
      @beunbad Před 2 lety

      What is the fuel burn?

  • @801pilot
    @801pilot  Před 14 lety +3

    220Hp for takeoff and climb, normal cruse at or below 180hp

  • @theduker3
    @theduker3 Před 13 lety

    SICK!!!!

  • @trestij
    @trestij Před 16 lety

    amazing

  • @OldManCassius
    @OldManCassius Před 13 lety +2

    Man, that's just silly. Very nice.

  • @stolflyer
    @stolflyer Před 16 lety

    Wow!

  • @DannyCreech
    @DannyCreech Před 13 lety +2

    Great video, I have a 701 myself and love flying them. I see you listed the temp and field elavation. But more importantly was the head wind you had. Which as you and I both know makes the take off VERY SHORT.
    I would say my shortest take off was 30 foot with about 15kts head wind. For me, I don't like to take the plane out with anything more than 10 kts blowing. Not because of the flying but because of the fliping over during Taxi. It's such a light plane and the wings develop so much lift.

    • @nautastro1503
      @nautastro1503 Před 5 lety +1

      701 is more stable in flight than 801 IMHO I tried both. I would use rotax 914 in 701.

  • @LifeWayOutHere
    @LifeWayOutHere Před 7 lety +1

    Do you have info you can share on the how-to process of making this work? I read the comments below, but do you have some more details you can provide? Thanks

  • @Tjita1
    @Tjita1 Před 13 lety

    When we get both STOL and speed (aka low fuel consumption per traveled distance unit) I will be really interested. As of today we don't have that, it's either get up in the air quickly or go fast, not both. 169 km/h at 75% cruise, that's at least 20 l/100km (probably a bit more), which isn't economicaly viable with todays fuel prices, at least not in Europe. With the same engine you get close to 300 km/h in an RV for example, but it takes of in over 300 m on the other hand.

  • @kencohagen4967
    @kencohagen4967 Před 7 lety +1

    What engine and hp was used in the aircraft? Can a mistral rotary provide the same performance?

  • @shaunporter3755
    @shaunporter3755 Před 4 lety

    Useful load? Take of distance full fuel? Est cost?

  • @tykyca
    @tykyca Před 15 lety +1

    That really is unbelievable.
    Beautiful plane, I'd love to build an amphibian to keep in the boathouse.
    How long does it take to fold the wings btw?

  • @CraigMaiman
    @CraigMaiman Před 13 lety +2

    After looking at every kit out there, this is the one I will build first. Like the idea of a turbo very much. What prop do you have on it?

  • @alejmeli
    @alejmeli Před 13 lety

    with a minimum of 30 knots headwind. yes

  • @brainmaker
    @brainmaker Před 10 lety +1

    What engine do you use ? What modifications did you make ? thanks

  • @801pilot
    @801pilot  Před 16 lety +2

    Love your belly pod airfox... Is it fiberglass? Do you sell them?

  • @swedishvolvo3677
    @swedishvolvo3677 Před 13 lety +1

    What is the cruse speed and range for this aircraft?

  • @jonny2387
    @jonny2387 Před 15 lety +1

    wow. i would love to fly one. whats the useful load

  • @jessehart05
    @jessehart05 Před 14 lety +1

    Hi, I just have to say that your plane is awesome. What is the horsepower range if you had a guess? Im building a toyota camry engine with a turbo for one of these planes. hoping for about 240 at prop. awesome job

  • @pizamoto
    @pizamoto Před 14 lety +1

    Is this really a turbo? Which motor did you use? I'm just past the beginning stage of thinking about building one. LOL (got the wife to say maybe)

  • @PilotPete109
    @PilotPete109 Před 15 lety +1

    Doesn't get any shorter!

  • @ritualghost
    @ritualghost Před 14 lety

    i can see why the raised the tail up and made it look so goofy. That thing would tailstrike all the time if it had a normal looking one.

  • @fjordking
    @fjordking Před 15 lety

    Carson city air port?

  • @qudrethaciyev1902
    @qudrethaciyev1902 Před 6 lety +1

    Thi pilot is really concurent again Frank knapp

  • @reggiepaulk
    @reggiepaulk Před 5 lety

    4,400 feet IS thick air!

  • @osatoo98
    @osatoo98 Před 8 lety +1

    i can see in the future helicopters being replaced by bush planes.

  • @gairnokkillstryke3875
    @gairnokkillstryke3875 Před 5 lety

    0:16 Camera man is killed. Please be more careful!

  • @davinchiis1
    @davinchiis1 Před 5 lety

    Better than Wilga !

  • @carbondragon6
    @carbondragon6 Před 13 lety

    sounds like a farmall tractor.
    Watch out for the thermals on take off, they will flip you over at such high angles of attack.

  • @mrwhistler
    @mrwhistler Před 15 lety

    What FAA rules? The regulations aren't there to stop you from hurting yourself, they're there to stop you from hurting others. I can't think of a single regulation that would prevent you doing that.