What is Consciencism? (Philosophy of Kwame Nkrumah)

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 10. 12. 2022
  • An explanation of Consciencism, also called Nkrumanism, the philosophy of Ghanaian politician and philosopher Kwame Nkrumah. Including Nkrumah's views on socialism, theism, materialism, and his concept of categorical conversion.
    Sponsors: NBA_Ruby, Antybodi, Federico Galvão, Mike Gloudemans, Andrew Sullivan, Eugene SY, Tyler James, Antoinemp1, Dennis Sexton, Joao Sa, Joshua Furman, Multitude, Ploney, Avatar, Diéssica, GhostlyYorick, Hendrick McDonald, horace chan, Will DeRousse, Star Gazer, Paul Linkogle, Julian Seidl, Doǧan Çetin, and Daniel West. Thanks for your support on Patreon! If you want to become a patron, follow this link: / carneades
    Here are some videos you might enjoy:
    The 100 Days of Logic ( • 100 Days of Logic (Full) )
    History of Philosophy ( • Four Weeks of Famous P... )
    Ancient Philosophers & Zeno’s Paradoxes ( • Schools of Ancient Gre... )
    ExPhi Experimental Philosophy ( / @experimentalphilosoph... )
    Map of Philosophy ( • The Map Of Philosophy )
    More videos with Carneades ( / @carneadesofcyrene )
    Philosophy by Topic:
    Epistemology: • Epistemology
    Metaphysics: • Metaphysics
    Political Philosophy: • Political Philosophy
    Philosophy of Religion: • Philosophy of Religion
    Ancient Philosophy: • Ancient Philosophy
    Philosophy of Science: • Philosophy of Science
    Philosophy of Language: • Philosophy of Language
    Philosophy of Art/Aesthetics: • Philosophy of Art (Aes...
    Buy stuff with Zazzle: www.zazzle.com/store/carneade...
    Follow us on Twitter: @CarneadesCyrene / carneadescyrene
    Information for this video gathered from The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, The Oxford Companion to Philosophy, The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, The Collier-MacMillan Encyclopedia of Philosophy, the Dictionary of Continental Philosophy, and more! #AfricanPhilosophy #Nkrumah

Komentáře • 24

  • @kanyotumunene2665
    @kanyotumunene2665 Před rokem +3

    Socialism and communal life was the rule of 95% of African political social and economic structure. The tribes that had heirachy where the one's influenced by contact with islam before colonialism. In Eastern Africa particularly in my country Kenya, every boy was required to be a warrior. Chiefs had a more spiritual role rather than political. The highest political structure was The Council of Elders who made political decisions, resolved disputes and deliberated on weighty issues affecting the community.
    Communities such as the Swahili had heirachies due to influence from the Arabs and Islam.
    To this date, even in our history i still haven't learnt of a Bantu or Nilotic tribe in East Africa that had a heirachical systems before colonialism.
    Yes, trade was taking place but organized by a chief with the backing of the community. The proceeds went straight to the families involved in trade. Chiefs did not recieve taxes or any form of compesation. The community would appreciate the Chief by helping the family work on their fields or herd his livestock.
    There are even instances where some tribes where headed by Women due to the level of equality and respect that existed between the genders.

  • @lindaasafo-adjei106
    @lindaasafo-adjei106 Před 7 měsíci +1

    Osagefo Dr Kwame Nkrumah was a Unique Noble man who had unique qualities and ideologies and a man who had principles for humanitarian support for Ghana and Africa.

  • @jennyaskswhy
    @jennyaskswhy Před rokem

    Great video. It is always interesting to be exposed to new ideas and this one merits further research

  • @fentonmulley5895
    @fentonmulley5895 Před rokem +2

    Wow!! What a cool video!! I love Kwame!!

  • @deismaccountant
    @deismaccountant Před rokem +1

    The immaterial deity problem is a
    Misunderstanding. Material is only primary relative to us, having emerged from matter. And any deity I respect does not need to be omnipotent either. Omnipotence and Omnibenevolence are Mutually exclusive in our universe full of suffering.
    I wish the Consciencism name wasn’t restricted to Nkrumaism, because I know of other pantheons and pagan paths that would greatly benefit from such an outlook. He was onto something other than the monotheism.

  • @arallskiant9923
    @arallskiant9923 Před rokem +2

    Materialism definitely has many historical link (liberation theology etc) with both islam and christianity but weirdly enough not in its metaphysical understanding (non-dialectical, before marx). Otherwise they might indeed be too (neo)atheist focusing on the ideological superctructure as a naive/magical understanding of social phenomenon (and so even have similar narratives of the far-right/conservatists theists).

  • @only20frickinletters
    @only20frickinletters Před rokem +4

    I offer this comment to the algorithm god

  • @chahuncoller
    @chahuncoller Před rokem

    I suggest you a video. Watch this short video for results on intelligence and the self that even philosophy and psychology professors haven't achieved yet. The name of the video is WHAT IS TABULA RASA? WHAT IS IQ INTELLIGENCE? WHAT IS THE CORRELATION BETWEEN THEM?

  • @InventiveHarvest
    @InventiveHarvest Před rokem +2

    I'm not well versed about African culture. But, I would expect that pre-colonial African societies were hierarchical and engaged in trade. That being said, cultures should endeavor to keep some of their distinctness in culture in the midst of pressure from modernization. Western style shirts and t-shirts are common all over the world these days - homogenizing the culture of the world. Even in US, we slip farther and farther from our gun-slinging wild west heritage. It is important to keep some distinctiveness while adapting to the modern status quo.
    The catch is to keep the good things from distinct cultures, and only take good things that modern culture offers. Different people have different ideas on what are the good things to keep. But hopefully, more and more people will realize that socialism is not one of those things

  • @subliminallime4321
    @subliminallime4321 Před rokem +5

    It definitely seems to me that he started with a conclusion that he wanted to arrive at & then worked backwards. I wonder why he didn't just go with some sort of substance dualism, or maybe that was his intention...

  • @aristippuscode
    @aristippuscode Před rokem

    Great idea. But...

  • @paulhaube
    @paulhaube Před rokem +3

    Not a philosophy, but more an ideology.

    • @humesspoon3176
      @humesspoon3176 Před rokem +2

      Are ideologies not technically philosophies at heart?

    • @sarveshjewalikar9921
      @sarveshjewalikar9921 Před rokem

      Ideologies are knowledge and philosophy is study of knowledge

    • @pcdm43145
      @pcdm43145 Před rokem +1

      @@humesspoon3176 Not necessarily. Then, again; both terms are used so broadly, it really depends on how you define it in your head.
      Personally, I like to use the analogy that *ideologies* are _blueprints,_ and *philosophies* are _maps._ A blueprint is used to build, and a map is used to navigate. Blueprints are a plan, based on a preferred outcome (say, if you wanted to build a house). Maps are sets of observations, which put together, accurately describe the world around you (like, say a map of a state or country).
      Think about it, this way: My own layman's understanding of Karl Marx, is that his concept of dialectical materialism is philosophy, wherein he tries to accurately describe the causes that shape human history with it; while socialism and communism are ideologies, in that he advocates for a certain goal, and suggests certain strategies and tactics for achieving it. Now, Im sure you could easily find a handful of Marxist scholars who would quibble with how roughly I've defined Marx's life's work, but it workable enough for me.
      So, in explaining how I define these things, Kwame Nkrumah's ideas seem more like ideology, than they do philosophy. But, you're free to make your own definitions, and come to your own conclusions.
      Anyway, if you had enough patience to read that whole thing, I hope it was helpful or useful to you. All the best, my friend.

    • @paulhaube
      @paulhaube Před rokem

      If it comes from the mind, it is imagined, an idea, a fantasy a dream, even if stimulated from the senses. If one hears “good” music, it feels nice and the imagination images “good” things. If one sees his boss, the mind sees demons ;-). A healthy and clear mind, applying the principles and technics of logic will distinguish what is real, true and virtuous... according to his understanding of his self and soul. Be well.

  • @martiallaw9509
    @martiallaw9509 Před rokem

    This is powerful and extremely interesting. The Western thought systems are Beautiful but the rising tide of African Culture is forming Syncretism of variant systems which includes African idiologoes or more practical systems. Good presentation. I'm constantly moving between multiple philosophies to bind without error.

  • @deepashtray5605
    @deepashtray5605 Před rokem

    Given that socialism, as I understand it, involves a central government controlling the economy, then I fail to see how precolonial Africa (the cultures which had not developed resource based urban societies) could be socialist. Just because there is a different cultural concept of ownership doesn't mean it is socialism.

    • @moustachio05
      @moustachio05 Před rokem

      Then you've misunderstood Socialism

    • @moustachio05
      @moustachio05 Před rokem +1

      Socialism isn't about the state controlling the economy its about the collective ownership of the means of production (for example factories) by workers

    • @deepashtray5605
      @deepashtray5605 Před rokem

      @@moustachio05 Not according to the definition.

  • @Dayglodaydreams
    @Dayglodaydreams Před rokem

    I'm a little surprised at how Socialist I've become (really I'm a Social Democrat, but that distinction is a fine-grained one). I heard the Socialist stuff and I nodded my head with no objection.

    • @CarneadesOfCyrene
      @CarneadesOfCyrene  Před rokem +2

      I think that there are few "pure" capitalists that think all industries should be private (see the military, the police, etc.), and there are few "pure" socialists who think everything should be state-owned. Most are somewhere in the middle, and all sit on a spectrum somewhere, but such nuances often get lost in the desire to be divisive and rail against authoritarian communism or "late capitalism".