Assassin's Creed | Who's The Dumbest Templar?
Vložit
- čas přidán 1. 07. 2024
- Many of the Templars in the Assassin's Creed series are typically pretty intelligent. But you'd be surprised how many dumb ones there are as well. In this video, I discuss who I think the dumbest Templar in Assassin's Creed is. Similar to a video I did a while back where I talked about who I thought the dumbest assassin in Assassin's Creed was.
Assassin's Creed | Who's The Dumbest Assassin?
• Assassin's Creed | Who...
Join this channel to get access to perks!
/ @masterassassin791
SUBSCRIBE!
/ @masterassassin791
00:00 Introduction
00:32 Crawford Starrick
01:14 Thomas Germain
01:32 Shay Cormac
01:59 Haytham Kenway
02:15 Charles Lee
03:25 Governor Torres
04:07 Prince Ahmet
04:53 Cesare Borgia
05:31 Rodrigo Borgia
05:56 Robert De Sable
06:19 Who's The Dumbest Templar? - Hry
Well Charles Lee running away from Connor was pretty smart though
Yes, it's also never a good idea to piss off Connor
Charles Lee must have been shocked when years later the Native American kid he choked appeared in those Assassin robes mercing entire platoons with just a tomahawk.
@@RainSennin_ismyAlt It was also a bad idea to be friends with Connor because he could stab you in the back
@@TheGB1 excuse me? Connor would not do that
Yeah the only friend he killed was his childhood best friend but his hand was forced for that
In defense of Starrik. He was the only one of these templars already sitting in top of the world, basically controlling the world’s mightiest city. The Assassins had been crushed and he didn’t believe any one would stand up to him. Making him develop his stupid arrogance. I would put Cesare as more stupid than either him or Lee.
The Frye twins did take down his Templars in a short timeframe so he didn’t have the luxury of time to plug the gaps in his organisation or adapt to their sudden attack on his power base the way figures like Robert de Sable did to anticipate Altaïr’s presence and plan accordingly.
@@jbcatz5 Exactly. Starrik wasn't stupid, just arrogant. And arrogance blinds you.
What happend to starrick he underrastiment the twins imagine! He the biggest boss of the templar and control london! And the only ppl that goes against him is jacob a stupid assassin i love jacob but the truth is the truth and evie a young girl so that what happen starrick was like " oh they aint gonna do shit they would lose " but wend they kill his cousin is what make him realized that the twins were kicking ass! But it was already late he should of deal with the twins sonner not after they defeated the blighthers.
In my opinion, Cesare as first with Starrick as a very close second. Cesare is the dumbest for me because he's supposed to be the big bad of AC Brotherhood and Machiavelli really hyped him up. He could have been the calculating and intellectual leader who is also a very fine warrior but in the end, he kept on making rash decisions that resulted in his own downfall. In fact, I'm pretty sure Ezio never really considered him a threat as a singular person.
I completely agree. Cesare rushed to decisions to whatever he thought would give him the advantage. He didn't think twice about any of the actions he made and he thought he could pummel the Assassins thinking that no significant action would be taken from them. Due to all this happening, this is why Rodrigo told him that he needed to take responsibility for his actions to which, of course, Cesare would put blame on his father instead of taking the responsibility himself. Even though Starrick was pretty stupid, I feel like he was just meant to be dumb, and while the same could be said for Cesare, he only became powerful because of his father and rode on his father's money and power. At least Starrick had some smarts to build up the rail industry handed to him which is something Cesare couldn't do. In a nutshell, Starrick gained and exhausted resources whilst Cesare only really exhausted resources gaining only a fraction of what he exhausted.
Exactly. An excellent soldier but a very poor politician. His ‘power moves’ on the extreme off-chance it did work wouldnt net as many profits as he thinks
So completely unlike his real life counterpart?
He killed his father believing himself to be invincible, then never realised his father being pope was the only reason he had any power in the first place
And in history Cesare was an evil conniving genius loved and feared by all of Italy
He wouldn’t have acted rash with all his scheming
He would definitely have not loss the people’s favor to a Firenza hoodlum
I don't know about the others, but I'd definitely say that Rodrigo is certainly not the dumbed. Sure, he does a lot of pointlessly evil things in his quest for power, but in Brotherhood, he was smart enough to not want to antagonize Ezio. He lost, got his ass beat, Ezio was merciful enough to let him live, and he realised he should count himself lucky and focus the templars elsewhere.
wasnt he one of the smartest? cuz he kinda did have a plan and if not for ezio he prolly would have easily succeded as he shambled the brotherhood
Crawford: “Muahahahaha! I am the greatest Templar ever!”
Evie: “Hey.”
Crawford: “Huh?”
He was greatest Templar not greatest Assassin. Comparing Templar to Assassin is like comparing blade to flesh. Templars live, Assassins make them die. He was probably greatest being Templar, maybe even better than Evie, but not better at assassinations.
@@XLORDPROPLevie killed starick that's what he meant
Both of them killed him did you play the game it wasn’t just Evie
Whose evie?.. (a joke cause she's forgettable like... Well everyone in syndicate as is the whole game)
It's wild to think that if Charles Lee never did go to that forest and casually beat up a random native american child, we would have never gotten one of the most memeable lines in the franchise, that being of course GIVE ME LEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
Points for Robert’s intelligence
1) He uses Altaïr’s body count to rally two opposing forces in order to take Masyaf. This fails because he didn’t get to King Richard or Saladin in time, but props for using the Templar losses to his advantage.
2) He anticipates Altaïr being at the funeral of one of his former targets to try ambush him, and sending in Maria as a body double as well. Sure he underestimated Altaïr’s renewed understanding of the Creed, but again he used his enemy’s past actions to make an almost effective plan against him.
Knew from the start Haytham wouldn't be the dumbest. Legitimately one of the most intelligent, charming, and well articulated character in the series. In the way Ezio represented the best aspects of the Assassin's, Haytham represented the best parts of the Templars. If they'd met, things may have ended differently, honestly.
his only dumb moment is putting too much faith and power into Lee, who repeatedly had shown himself to be an ill fit to be a high-ranking Templar
@@markzilla6895 What makes it worse is that in the book, Haytham did see through Lee at first. He noticed him trying way too hard to impress him and then giving everyone at the docks a dirty look when they first met.
That ultimately led to his downfall as he didn't want the admit all those years in trusting Lee was a mistake.
He seems to not 100% on Templar code, and wants to distance himself from European order. Why does he provoke Connor anyway?
As far as I know Connor is his only (and even if he is not, clearly his most competent) child. He could just steer Connor to be his heir and personal operator.
Connor only has beef with Lee, Haytham could easily dismiss such a man as he clearly outlived his usefulness. This way him and his son they could have made a new inner establishment among both sides.
There will always be a Templar order and Assassin Brotherhood. At least both could be manipulated by same dynasty, your family.
Keep that in mind, most members of both organisations don't care about the ideals. Most templars just seek for trade partners, allies in politics, information etc. And most assassins are either anti-authoritarian reactionary rebels, or murderous criminals who are after some quick cash. Who cares about world ending prophecies, prophets and Isu etc.
Not even grandmasters of the Brotherhood cares. Late Altair cared only about peace of his people and well being of his family, Ezio didn't cared until his 40s, and only cared after because he had no other option. Connor again is after revenge and well being of his people. Arno is there for Elise, Jacob and Evie was born into it, Bayek was there for revenge, rest was there for money. Do you see a pattern here? They change, of course, but they change because of the templar threat. And only few madmen who want to control the world that causes all the middlemen to die.
And nobody (in his right mind) went to the brotherhood, studied the creed, believed it with all his mind and heart and became an Assassin.
I see a pattern here.
That would be a fun conversation to hear. Doesn’t Haytham have a particular distaste for the Assassins though? I mean the only reason he and Connor had any kind of dialogue is because they are related, and even then Haytham put Connors life on the line on multiple occasions because of the Assassins
A cool video idea would An video on each assassin swapping places in each games and how the story’s would changes an example: if Conner was the main character of unity. You explain how you think Conner would do against the Templars at that time if you think he would do better or worse then Arno and how he would react to the assassin’s
Edit: thank you for the likes and the nice comments 😀
I really like this idea. Hopefully MA sees this
Great idea!!
This could be a series. what if scenarios of different assassins in different time periods and how they would approach it.
Do it master Assassin
I asked him something similar to this in a video a while ago, a what if Connor fought Rodrigo or Ezio fought Charles Lee. He thought it was a good idea so maybe what you and I are thinking is in the pipeline 😁
You know what I just realized, Crawford Starrick is like most of the FC6 side villains, you don't have much interaction with him until the very end where he 'needs' to die, at least with the previous templars you as an assassin still interact with them quite frequently, and that kinda added on to the poor writing of him. At times it feels that the hero/villain trait of AC is going the polar opposite of that in FC, where like you said with Starrick being cartoonish evil and just wanted to control London
A lot of games are like that
I don't think it's necessarily bad writing. Starrick is at the top of the world. It makes sense that he would be arrogant and complacent, laying back and doing whatever he pleases
I think the big defense for Crawford is that he was leader in the one city that was never supposed to fall, it feels in a way like, “well he’s not the best Templar, but he is loyal, put him in the backlines”
Charles Lee choosing to not kill Connor when he had him on his knees at Haytham's funeral was dumb. Gotta love how the antagonist has a chance to kill the protagonist and yet he or she wants to make them suffer first or just chooses to walk away and turn a blind eye while the henchmen make the kill instead.
U forgot in the final mission he had u beat again but he lets u shoot him when he could’ve ran away more or finished Connor off.
@@ChristianHuye True he should have done either.
Imo i feel like Shay was just so lost and confused. Most the time he didn't even believe in the Templar code either. His whole conflicting feelings about who's right just makes rogues story for me feel all over the place a bit
Shay is pretty smart, good tactician, wish we got a sequel where Arno would’ve hunted him down, maybe with Connors help.
We at lease got to see a book sequel with his grandson being a assassin hunter as well.
Aveline’s mom from Liberation certainly not dumb either if Liberation and Freedom Cry eventually get added here too.
I mean... Haytham allowing himself to get killed by his own son was kind of dumb, but on the other hand I kind of get the point that he technically had no choice.
The thing about Haytham is that he was too old and tired to keep fighting, and didn't really believed in Templars anymore. Plus, he didn't want to kill Connor, his own son. The goal for him there was to secure the future of Templars in Frontier by giving Lee enough time to escape. Which he did, but not for long.
That was not a dumb move, he was tired of everything and he never wanted to kill Connor anyway
Watching this gave me an interesting idea for a video versus series. What if you took a Templar leader from one period and pitted them against an Assassin from another. For example, taking Rodrigo Borgia and putting him in charge of the Victorian England Templars to go up against Jacob and Evie Frye, and discuss how it would unfold. That would make for some interesting what if scenarios.
Jacob and Evie would just jump him bruh😂 it's a 2v1 after all.
Shay vs Literally any assassin would be quite interesting. If anything, I expect that instead of him killing the assassin, he either makes them a Templar or becomes an Assassin again.
Feel like that would be hard to do depending what the boundaries are.
Is he still the pope or is it just him without that power in the position of Crawfish?
did you and thomas copied each other or what? literally 2 exact same comments very close to one another....
Cesare being dumb is so ahistorical. The Prince is not just written about him, but it's written mostly because Macchivelli wanted to show how even a truly impressive statesman could fuck up.
This one was such a fun video! Very tough choice for the dumbest of templars indeed. I was almost sure you would pick either Cesare or Lee, but even if I never played Syndicate, I understand Starrick is a prime candidate in this category as well.
Well played!
I don´t think that Starrick can be called the dumbest templar, because he managed to get this big and important city London completely under his control. The whole infrastructure and the gangs of London were completely in his hands and that is something a dumb person can not achieve. Based on what we see in Syndicate he can be called dumb, but with this background of his control of London I don´t think he is a better choice for "dumbest templar" than Lee or Cesare.
Amazing video been watching you for months funny asf keep it up !!!
The irony in Syndicate is that, while Starrick is the main villain, all the other secondary villains are better villains and smarter than he is. Maxwell Roth is like a better version of Starrick, way more intimidating and charismatic.
awesome video man always gets better and better
I haven't played all of the games, but Garnier de Naplouse always struck me as the most redeemable (sub) villain of all the ones I have seen. He uses brutal methods, but he genuinely believes that he is doing good by reforming sick people into soldiers, giving beggars a chance for a better life. When Altair debates him he almost persuades Altair that he was actually doing good. If Robert de Sable is one of the dumbest, then I think Garnier was one of the most intelligent.
For me Torres was the most meh templar. He wasn't so developped. He was just present in the begening and desappeared until a middle game mission then desappeared again to appear in the last ones.
He suffered of poor writing.
Torres is actually a pretty unique Templar, he is one of the kindest, that’s why he gives his enemies many chances.
I was sure Charles Lee would win. Between choking a Native American boy who would grow up to hunt him down and his final mission where he has Connor beat, then gives him a whole “You lost” monologue just to let a severely injured Connor shoot him(when he could’ve finished Connor off or walked away). Charles Lee literally has a single digit IQ.
Ok i have to disagree on the first one.
"He was too weak trying to control only one city"
Yeah, LONDON. The most powerful capital of the most powerful empire at the time. (And im french). You control London, you control the world.
Not to mention he kept the Assassins scared out of London except for Henry Green until Jacob and Evie defied their elders and went in with only Henry as support.
Love your video, and you should do it if everyone's assassin and templar switch everyone game and which game they should be in
Technically not a templar but the spartan king in Oddysey takes the gold medal for me, he reveals himself to you and instead of executing you or something he just lefts you at the border of the city so you can come back and kill him, he also doesnt try to hyde but goes to his own house.
I would say Cesare because he didn’t know when to quit and that’s what ultimately lead to his death
I’ve been waiting for this 🎉
0:34 Me who played Syndicate as my first AC game: *crying intensifies*
"Pissing off ezio is just never a good idea." that it took the templars 3 generations to realise that says a LOT about them
In my opinion one of the dumbest templats we saw in the games was minsieur de la serre in unity. He had arno living with him for years and could have made him believe the assassins killed his dad making arno one of the best assassin hunters the order would have known but chose not to introduce arno to the conflict at all
To be fair, De Laserre was for the most part a moderate Templar who remained diplomatic concerning the Assassins. De Laserre and Mirabeau were responsible for the truce between the Parisian Assassins and Templars. The reason they died was because the more radical/fanatic elements of their orders needed them gone.
If Francois De Laserre were truly invested in Arno as a Templar he would’ve done more to pull him into the Templar Order than to send his daughter. But it was clear that his desire to make Arno a Templar was a fleeting intention and not a true portent of indoctrination. Arguably, I believe this is more a verification of good character than indictment of a bad Templar.
In the end he had been right, the fanatic elements of the Templar Order almost destroyed it-as well as their enemies.
An idea could be who is like the most extroverted or introverted Assassin.
Ezio and Edward are the most extroverted
@@gt5bonelesshuman421 and Altair the most introverted
@@Rodrigo_B_Viana Yes
Hey so probably not the greatest idea but I was wondering if you could do like, ranking the hideouts? Ya know cause there’s quite a few like homestead, masayf or however you spell it, the ac unity hideout, and even include rogues? I can’t remember if he actually ended up with a hide out but… nonetheless im sure you can make it work. Thanks!
That's a good idea actually. I personally like Unity's hideout the most. The Cafe was awesome with all of the rooms, and it feels so good to renovate and fill with mementos.
In my opinion if we were counting the templars origins and we could choose multiple it would be every templar that chose to kill bayek and amunets son had they not done so their plans might have gone unnoticed
I don't really know if being dumb is the right term. I think it is a cross between not fully understanding the risks of being a Templar and made an illusion they are untouchable. In this case, untouchable is not literal, the way I was using it I meant that they overestimating themselves (the Templar), and underestimating their opponent (the Brotherhood). This is not in all cases though. A great example of this is Shay. He is an exception to this rule because he knew what the Assassins were capable of before attacking. On a side-note It has been quite some time since I have played AC Rogue, so don't quote me on the attacking part. I do remember that he didn't attack first in the first mission when he was punched by his boss (and in another mission which I forgot the name of).
I would honestly say Cesare is the dumbest. Starrick's way of establishing his reign requires a tad bit of thought honestly. Starrick was basically a businessman. He had control over gang leaders, almost every manufacturer in London, omnibuses, trains, electronic communication, medicines. This guy had carefully placed his own men and women in control of these things. With the amount of thought it takes to do that, I would consider Cesare to be more dumb. Starrick although is a goofy villain and his motives make no sense. But Cesare was in command of armies, and he was widely popular. But based on Cesare's actions throughout the game, he acted with haste, and planned without much forethought. Starrick may have been insane, but he was way more methodical than Cesare or Charles Lee.
Let’s be honest here the fact that Germaine wasn’t dumber or crazier is actually a testimony to him. Dude was a sage of axton the fact he wasn’t coco is already commendable as axton by that point already lead about 10 known sages of himself into pure insanity
Whos Axton?
@@edgyomellete0121 sorry wrong god. Aita. He was the sage of Aita
The fact Charles singlehandedly caused the dismantle of the Colonial branch because of a power trip is INSANE lmao
That's what you get when you ally with a racist 😂
Charles Lee. A bully and a psychopath.
When being apprenticed by Haytham, he appears to be humble and respectful at first, but it's clear later that it's only a ruse.
As soon as Haytham is away, he basically antagonizes everyone and everything he comes across, leading to the downfall of the Templars in North America.
While Haytham was cool, thoughtful and calculating, Lee was brutal, reckless and impulsive.
All of the people Haytham recruits in the prologue end up chasing their own goals, it’s why Haytham helps Connor in killing one of them.
Great Video!
Charles Lee was such a bizarre character. When we first meet him he's an earnest and well mannered person but the next time we see him he's a power hungry Sociopath. What the hell happened to him because he is the only ACIII templar tmwho had a dramatic personality shift. The others were exactly the same at the start of the game and later in the game.
most influential support character/assassin best friend. without leo, ezio wouldn't have been as successful as he was. without achilles, more wise in his older years, connor wouldn't have had the training/knowledge, bayek had aya, evie and jacob had henry, etc.
We needa see a Bayek VS Conner!!
Anyone else REALLY want to see Ezio vs Haytham and no excuses about Haytham just having guns
Ezio also got an gun an Hidden gun
@@00martoneniris86 true but a small fire arm (or should I say Fire Wrist) on your wrist isnt gonna save you from a flintlock that is just entirely better
@@zer0fukz790 I think it’s best if there’s no range weapons
@@grandmasternarginder5435 yeah I'd prefer that because most youtubers that cover this just say the one with the gun wins
Ezio holds high profile and occasionally presses counter and taunt, while Haytham spams counter til one outlasts the other
add the chronicles games too pls als olove youir vids i get hyped every time i see you have uploaded
"cartoonishly evil" Hes even got the mustache.
This might be a weird one, but maybe a which templar was harder to defeat, ranking both side quests to weaken them and the boss battles
If I recall the timeline properly, Rodrigo has the longest tenure between the playable Assassin beginning their quest to tear you down, and it actually being done, heck it took 2 games for it to be done, which should probably count for something.
Caesare's attack on Monteriggioni was a masterstroke that netted him the Apple, killed Mario, and crippled Ezio. Caesare screwed up everything only *after* that.
Starrick deserves more credit for creating the economic-scientific-criminal machine he sat at the center of. Like Caesare, he was slow to adapt to changing circumstances, but he had a strong set-up.
Charles Lee was dumbest. His cruelty served no purpose and just made him enemies. He didn't create a machine, but was merely a loyal cog in one. His only real sign of intelligence was that Haythem believed in him.
Interesting thought for a what if. What if Connor saw who burned his village and joined the Templars.
first of all, amazing video and i see why you say starrick is the dumbest but i personally wouldnt put him completly att the bottom because his plans i think were pretty grand with him slowly taking over England as the dominant world power at the time, while yes he was a cartoonish villain his goals and ways to get his goals were just that grand i'd say
3:45
Replaying AC4 it is heavily implied Torres knows Edward is bullshitting himself as Walpole. He strings Edward along to be an errand boy until the night he tries breaking the sage out of captivity.
I think Cesare is wayyy more power hungry than dumb.He was literally blinded by power
And if he loses it, or does not obtain it, he goes puppy dog eyes and cries lmao.
Can you do the Jackdaw vs the Morrigan?
As much as I love Brotherhood, between Cesare, Juan Borgia, and the Baron it sometimes felt like I was dealing with a panto!
The regular costume changes didn't help.
Should do a video on who has the most battle iq for explain who would you want in a war they are all assassins they all have skill in this obviously but who has the most battle iq but in opinion I think it would be bayek off the fact the made most of assassin ways and trained them "ending of origins" but also could be Altair off he's feats and experience alone and maybe ezio I think it could be those 3
for me, cesare is the dumbest due to his ambition for rule the world and he thought that he couldnt be killed by any one, also he thought that kill mario and messed with ezio was a good idea but in truth was not, we can see in ac 2 when ezio brothers and father publically execution which not only enraged him but let him went on full revenge + anger mode. we can also see this when sofia kidnapped and yusuf killed which made him angry like in ac 2 and brother hood.
he probably thought that if he did then that would make Ezio reckless since emotions can cloud judgment, then at the moment one of the expendables would kill him
@@aaron75fy assuming that it may be true but lets think on this: on ac 2, not only ezio got in rage for wanting revenge for his family but also he is very calm due to his uncle and others assassin fellow guidance. so in other words, like if any soldier of cesare can able to kill him but ezio skills were unmatched, to the end killing ezio while he is enrage and his skills are not compared so its a no go for them.
@@thanhlongvo7092 he still got caught before he could do anything though, if the army he brought to the invasion was more competent we wouldn't have a game
@@aaron75fy dont you remember that each main character in each time line can face and destroy whole army at once? same thing with ezio, and also at the time cesare just want to taunt ezio and command the sniper only to shoot him but not kill him off.
@@thanhlongvo7092 like I said, there would not be a game
Haythem was definitely the smartest Templar as he wasn’t easily influenced by others or at the attempt of power or riches he obviously had power and money but he was set in completing his objectives and goals himself whereas other Templar’s simply used others to complete their goals like Crawford Starrick Chesare Borgia and the AC4 Templar’s
Another w video from master assassin himself. Even making me jealous that I’m not in this franchise
How do you know it’s a good video if it’s only been out for 2 minutes???
@@FPM17 He used the force
@@FPM17 i used the force
@Darth Vader that's not how the force works
@@omarsamir1461 I find your lack of faith disturbing
Dumbest Templar Was Edward James Kenway Because he became Assassin and dumbest Assassin was Shay Patrick Cormac because he became Templar. Change my mind.
Edward never really was a templar
Edward wasnt a templar, he went to Havana in search of god
@@SIMPH0N0SO you mean gold
@@69... Well...he was unwittingly
I would put Lee in place of Starrick. Starrick did manage to basicly own London and keep it for many years while the Assassins were hopeless. You could argue that his subordinates were the reason for this, but he was still smart enough control every aspect of society through them.
Starrick seems like the type to twirl his moustache while getting away after robbing a bank
My video idea would be a fun one. Who amongst the assassins has the most kill count?
2:15 I don't see an apprentice. I see a strong man dominating one of the most badass assassins.
Dumbest Templar is my homie Tony. Bro just don’t think sometimes
Yeah, "Brotherhood" Cesare is nothing like "Prince" Cesare
Cesera was dumb, but theres a good argument Ezio was even dumber. If he,d taken the advice of a certain character in assasins creed 2 and not allowed Rodrigo to live.....chances are, Bhood wouldnt have happened. Then when it does happen said character reminds Ezio of this fact.
Next video should be Morrigan vs Jackdaw
I probably forgot by why was Charlies lee and the crew nearby the native Indian village, since it was apparently Washington
🎶Cesare, oh Cesare
A man of great depravity
Believed himself immortal 'til
He had a date with gravity 🎶
To give balance, Shay didn’t exactly frame his perspective to Achilles in the best way. He used inexact, emotional language rather than articulating how the goal of the mission was the direct cause of the earthquake. The Templars know how to pull his strings, leaving him with an Irish family to recover who just happen to have a son who went off fighting a cause and who needed protection, something they knew he’d be sympathetic to. It doesn’t help that the Assassins aren’t presented to be sympathetic to begin with or at least after Lisbon, but that could be Shay’s later Templar aligned mindset influencing his earlier memories.
I do note you’ve only done historical Templars, nothing from the modern day. Vidic, Daniel Cross (he’s got more background in the comics), Otso Berg, Alan Rikkin, they’re Templars too.
Hey master Assassin, how about doing a who’s the Hottest, Templars and Assassin’s both.
please any person help me i have bully scholarship edition game in window 7 i do high resolution in game that crashes my bully game before i open game the game is not open show only error input not supporting plz anyone help me from this problem
Off topic but I just wanted to say who do you think would win in a battle between Shay Cormac and Bayek?
bayek obviously bro was the protector of a whole kingdom as medjay and shay cormac is just another templar who was trained by the assassins and yes shays story and conflict is good but in raw power bayek destroys him. bayek has fought elephants and he is a powerhouse of a man.
@@BlooGoose I don't know man, ignoring the whole technological advantage, what Bayek has in brawns, Shay seemingly makes up in brains
Hi man love your content
Please make a video on WHICH ASSASSIN HAS MOST GIRLS or WHO IS MOST FAMOUS AMONG GIRLS
Who is the best assassin at crowd blending
Please do who's the drippiest
will you review ac chronicles
Do you talk slow or do you slow down to sound clearer? If it's the latter, there's like, 5% of excess.
Fun video but now I just wanna know who's the smartest.
thinking of them historically too Ceaser was actually quite successful and Terros constantly got and lost governorships
Who's the deadliest templar or which templar have the most kills if you haven't done these ideas before
Next category: who was the most heroic assassin
( assassins with the most or best heroic traits)
You know Ezio is going to win that hands down, he’s got three games to choose from.
@@jbcatz5 honestly i can see why a lot of people like him. I personally like Arno and Shay but maybe one day I will take a look at the ezio games
Rodrigo wanted the Apple when he was young and he died receiving it. (This was not his expectation)
Honestly, the historical Cesare was immensely intelligent, with his only downfall being trusting a new pope after his father died of malaria (yes, that's what killed Alexander VI: malaria). Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood did him an immense disservice with how he was written as reckless.
I kinda agree about Jermaine he all ways mysterious and all ways keep he's tampler meeting secretive so I think he's good tampler leader way better than brotherhood assassin's leaders
*reads title*
I like this video already...
Please, play Unity without being spotted. Like you did in Valhalla :)
Shay was definitely dumb. He entered his confrontation with Achilles hot headed as can be when it must have taken him days if not weeks to get back to the homestead and bring his concerns in a convincing manner.
He could've convinced Achilles. He could've convinced his old comrades. He didn't try
Forgot the Templars from Chronicles
Haytham is one of the smartest characters in general, but dumb move of him to choke his son out who also happens to have hidden blades on his arms lmao
He did it on purpossed so that connor could kill him. Why do you think he left and entrusted his journal for connor so that he could read and understand his life journey?
Haytham knew what he was doing lol. He wasn’t blind to Connor having dual blades.
Haytham is probably the third smartest , after altair and ezio
I’d have said the dumbest is Charles Lee. He did very little if anything to benefit the Templars agenda or goals, and was essentially a bulldog in human clothing.
Starrick I would rank next to Lee because even though he was the grandmaster of the English Templar Order at the time, he came off as more of a gang leader than a leader of a religious, enlightened order (which tbh fits the game he was in since it’s Victorian London and you’re mostly fighting mobsters).
He craved personal power above all else and it’s a shock that the Templars didn’t kill him themselves for putting himself over the order.
Cesare Borgia I would’ve ranked as the bronze medalist. Yes he’s fecking bonkers like Starrick is, but for the most part Cesare has control over his madness, only losing that control during Brotherhood when his life as Italy’s favoured son starts to unravel and his sordid affair with his sister is made public.
I even doubt he was a true templar as he never enacts thier goals or agenda the same way his father did, and just uses his armies to take what he wants when he wants by force.
That said, because he controlled himself better than Starrick (who would shoot a henchman just for interrupting him with important news), and as such he held onto the reigns of power for much longer.
Now in terms of the best Templars, I’d have said Rodrigo Borgia sits at the top for the fact he never sought power for his own sake, but purely for furthering the influence of the order. Yes the personal power he had as the pope was nice but it was never the endgame. As pope the ammount of things the Templars could do was vastly expanded, not just in Italy but the whole of Europe, who all respected or were wary of the Papacy.
Haytham Kenway is the silver medalist for me as while he’s nowhere near a master manipulator like Rodrigo Borgia was, he was still highly intelligent and capable, and like Borgia, never sought out personal power for his own gain, and in fact pursued greater influence for the Templars with an even greater determination than Rodrigo did.
He was also more open minded than Rodrigo, who I imagine would’ve scoffed at the idea of letting assassins join the order under any means.
The bronze medal I’m not sure who I’d really give it to to be honest. I would’ve said Al Mualim, but he was a Templar Traitor who 100% prioritised personal power over the order, with the only “good” thing he did was somehow masquerading as the Assasins Grandmaster for many years.
I think the dumbest are Cesare (for obvious reasons) and Elise's father (for even thinking France's situation could be resolved through the manipulation and negotiation of a weak and corrupt aristocracy alone).
Starrik I think is the dumbest. He would just complain and play his piano while you took london district by district.
You need to include shao jun
Hard disagree about Cesare's attack on Monteriggioni being stupid. The complete opposite in fact. Ezio and the Assassins were inevitably going to be a threat to the Borgias no matter what. The only logical move to make was a preemptive strike. Which DID almost go off perfectly. They killed the Assassin Grandmaster, destroyed their base of operations, captured a valuable artifact, took hostages, and wounded Ezio. The last part was the only failure of the attack, since if they'd succeeded in killing him they would have won control of Italy.
Shay is my favorite Templar I’m saying this, because not only is he a powerful assassin, but the guy himself has my strong morality and moral code, and I make some a powerful openent want to be feared, and respected by a Assassins and Templars
it still bothers me that in order to show that "templars could be good too!" they had to dumb down the assassins terribly.