Using a splitter reduces signal by 3.5 db - 1/2 your signal is lost. You also get losses through impedance mismatch. Typical airwaves antenna z is 300 ohm, CATV equipment is 75 ohm. I would get a better signal by licking my finger and sticking it into my ear.
@@tedmed7349 nah.. He would have better luck with the reception with the other finger up the glory hole.. Maybe try the right toe in the left ear also..
Might seem like a good idea and 10 points for trying this out, BUT given the 10dB tap loss on the 4 taps, you might have done way better just with folding the shield back and having the inner core exposed, thereby constructing a simple dipole antenna.
As a lifelong avionics tech & have tinkered with many antennas & arrays at home I have to throw the B.S. flag on this one. Something as simple as a cheap set of old skool rabbit ears will work better for digital/ hd
Neophyte scenario/question: Someone has plenty of terminals, shielded cable and unshielded wire. Can they just solder a T antenna with a 1 meter unshielded top bar and an arbitrary length shielded terminal connection for same-room placement?
for fun, try putting a simple copper, Al wire in the antenna hole of the TV and after that compare the necessity for such (time wasting)constructions you can build a much simpler antenna by simply take the isolation (both extern and intern) on a TV cable by 1m and simply connect with a normal TV connector
Cause didn't the West end of the ball to bully light word used intentionally the part them Arabs lived in therefore the gadgets they felly hud to come up with after the flattening s
What the hell is that cobbledinput a double male to a double female to a 90 and a barrel could have just connected the coax direct to split eliminating any line seperation issues
Anyone who knows 2 cents about RF knows this is stupid. A 6 inch piece of copper wire connected to each leg of a 300/75 ohm line matching transformer and positioned horizontally opposing will perform better and is quicker, easier, less clunky, and cheaper to make.
Don't waste your time with this BS. By the time you use all of these small antennas welded to the splitter box. The amount of DB loss from the splitter and the small elements. You may get some local stations but this is not a powerful antenna by any means. You could probably buy a $20 piece of junk from Walmart that worked better. Nothing is free!
For those last few steps with all the extensions fastened to the splitter followed by the black cable, why not just hook the black cable directly to the splitter? Also at least one of those soldering jobs looked kind of flimsy.
This is why I came to comments! To see if anyone else asked this already. And you did! Why not connect that black cable directly to the blank spot on the splitter?? No idea why he added all those extensions
You'd get better results sticking a wire into the aerial socket on the tv. How about backing up what you've done with a polar chart? It's a con & can't believe people fall for this rubbish
If this actually worked, and I use "IF" very strongly, I would weld the antennas to the coax instead of soldering them. Plus my guess is that the broadcast towers are less than 10-15 miles away.
Why even waste money on those antennas. Just cut the coax the correct length to begin with. Also all those gender benders on the input are nonsense waste too. Well actually the whole thing is a waste of time and money. Just attach a 6 inch piece of wire to each leg of a 300/75 ohm line matching transformer and position them horizontally opposing. It's quicker, easier, less clunky, cheaper to make, and will outperform this nonsense contraption.
@@RazorStrap Hell, I built a UHF loop antenna out of speaker wire, cardboard, duct tape, and a paperclip, -- WITHOUT a transformer -- and I was reliably picking up analog signals from 50 to 70 miles away back in college. Granted, digital is a bit more fragile, but I bet I could still pull in the locals with that setup from that same location if I still lived there. This splitter idea is a waste of time and money, and wouldn't receive jack squat at that distance.
This dose not make a multi element antenna if anything it would reduce the signal you would have got just hooking one antenna to the coax with no splitter the signals would not add up they would cancel each other being out of phase add multipath interfearance and a host of other negatives like impedance mismatching etc. Best thing to do with that is turn it upside down and say it's centipede art.
Hooked 5 different antenna to a splitter and scanned and get 85 channels in Minneapolis. Put an antenna amp in between splitter and set. Newer amps. act as smart devices at least some and they optimize the signal for the set.
This will never work. Unless I saw the video incorrectly, all the terminals and antennas are in the TAP = output and the cable from TV's input is connected to the splitter's input. That does not work. To make this effective, the IN needed a "source" another copper antenna or to be connected to an areal external antenna, and all the TAP needed to be linked (soldered) to the OUT effectively combining all the outputs into a "boosted" single output which will then be connected to the TV. This video is just a plain lie.
I think this is bullshit as well. Did you notice that rectangular box with a cable coming out of it stuck to the TV? I've seen stuff like this before where they try to make fools out of people. Remember the idiot who claims to pick up digital channels with CDs?
Couldn't you just take the last elbow male-to-female adapter and screw it directly on the output? Or even bypass the elbow itself, really. Unless maybe you need the 2 inch extension for some reason. It probably doesn't matter in this case with a strong signal, but every extra connection in that chain attenuates the signal a little.
so, the video is another language, the title is english and most of the comments on tiktok are usually the same language as the video this is confusing
hi,..great knowledge u have,.. i love it,..can it apply on paid channels in my decorder? i want to watch paid channels,..specially soccer kindly help...
Your absolutely right. SMART TV awu to go, And u can do away with the dish type survive and save $100.00 to $200.00 dollars a month to buy gas to go to work with. Thank Ya Joe
Very ture, $49.00 dollars at Wall Mart comes a router, controller to turn the antenna with 41 channels all day long at 18 feet off the ground.Just try to get it mounted as close to 30 feet off the ground as you . You hook up a dvd recorder/player/Blue Ray to record any and all programs you may want to watch or save for later No dish
What type or Brand Soldering Iron (it looked solid black from what I could tell) are you using in this video? I like it. I want to purchase one like it or similar. Thank you! Bart
How far away are you from the broadcasting towers. I have a neighbor who is an electrical engineer and he built your little antenna and it did not pick up any channels that are 54 miles away from our city.
@@clancambo5297 There are a few who are legitimate, but most videos from India that involve building anything electrical or electronic are fake. I just watch for the Indian hands and listen for the Indian music, then stop, go back to the link and click "don't recommend this channel" They don't care what anyone thinks. Look at all the views they get until the people catch on.
Loss yep on a splitter like that 5 way you may as well say 10 db loss chances are the n presenter is within mileof any transmitting tower and a piece coax laidon floor connected directly to tv would do better
Just noticed that splitter is strictly distribution only one true output and 4 tap offs or reduced lel to allow out put more pass through basically if 20 DB sig went in input the tap offs would possibly allow 2 out each and the pass through out put would probly be 15 Designed for lines say going through a hotel and at every 4 rooms you place one to " tap for the 4 rooms and then extend throughoutput to next group of 4 1950 60 technology!!! I have replaced hundreds of those overly years as system tech in top 4 catv company
@@daleanthony6091 unless amplified the noise floor does not increase as useable signal decreases ,it just stays there and the pure signal drops to it's level Giving impression of increase
In 90s I use to stick a needle directly into my TV antenna output.Saw my naghbours channels,it was like 7 channel s I managed to catch from his parabol.🤣
hes probably less than a kilometer/Mile from the signal, I have a substantial 75 mile antenna on my roof most of the TV stations transmission towers are around 40 miles and I only get 2 stations without the antenna amplifier with I get around 25 stations
.....and I thought that the scene off of the movie "War Game's" was false, when that kid turned that Pringles can into a supersonic, bionic, chronic, electronic, high colonic powerful antenna to listen in on his adversaries with......it was OverKill! By the way how do make a sled out of a cardboard box....you don't!
I say it's bullshit he needs to show the wire connected to the back of the TV and it always hunging off the table so he might have a cable hook to the TV
Instead of that I used real tv antennas into a splitter and pointed each one to different cities. Then 15db amplifier on the combined signal. Got amazing results with favorable atmospheric conditions.
The gain is probably somewhere in the negative region and the impedance will be all over the place. As for the polar pattern I doubt anyone could predict it! But as long as the local TV mast is in your back yard you'll be OK...
This channel has a lot of time wasting projects - must be to hope get some earning with youtube ads - I like the word "powerful" whatever that means - it is a favorite word in these projects
I live in a city.. I tried a 25 dollar antenna but I'm getting limited channels. I got a cheap antenna for 5 dollars and I was able to get 87 channels.
Pointless work. Better buy a cheap rabbit ears than to waste time finding a splitter, the coax cable, the F connectors, the extendable antennas...he's just clearing out his junk box parts. He is no "Pro." I come here to rip on him and his idiot projects.
@@michaelwyckoff7593 Yours works because it is properly designed and has an amplifier. This one is just a pile of junk with no amplifier. That's why it's rubbish.
@@andyhowlett2231 maybe you are right. But trust me it was not easy to get the setup to really work as good as it does. Of course there are some channels that are rubbish.lol. But the few OTA channels I do watch come in very good. If you look around people can find a good reasonably priced indoor antenna. The main reason I have an antenna hooked up is because I refuse to pay for OTA channels that are free. Cable makes a fortune charging people for OTA channels.
NO NO NO…!!! Just about anything will work if you’re only a couple miles or so away from the broadcast antenna. That thing will never pick up a signal from 50 miles away.
This is a waste of time. Just connect a 2 or 3 ft piece of wire to the ant input. No different. Take it from me a 40 year veteran in broadcast radio and TV engineering.
Wow! Amazing! Some cheap parts, a soldering iron and the cable companies are out of business. Well there is the problem of physics. But perhaps in Morocco electromagnetic radiation follows different laws. If this passes for good technical advice in Morocco it goes a long way to explaining some third world problems. But maybe people who did not get a good education can be forgiven for posting the attaboy comments on Sat Pro's videos. But maybe they will read the comments and start to wonder and then begin to ask questions and then maybe even start to educate themselves. Maybe, perhaps, we can at least hope. Kudos to those who took the time to point out some of the flaws in this silly video. I would say more, but my Amazon delivery is here with the gas saving water injector, the 200 mile antenna booster, and a special plug that reduces the electric bill to zero. Then I have to reply to that letter from the Nigerian Minister of Finance.
Signal loss from each connector screwed together on input side of splitter....plus, signal loss from splitter itself. Better idea would be to unwind a thousand foot length of copper wire from the back of an old CRT TV tube, then, connect one end to the TVs antenna input center hole, while marching up to the roof with the other end. While standing in the center of the roof, gently insert the end of the wire deep inside the colon, passing through the anus , until a sharp pain is felt near the liver. Wait quietly for a thunderstorm to arrive to alleviate the pain permanently, while your family enjoys crisp 4K images below in your TV room !
I am satellite cable technician with 40 years of experience using splitter to connect multiples TV this will drop the signal this is lies. Wasting ur time.
'Almost everything' can work as an antenna. But if you get the equipment and measure it, it's still just a crappy antenna. Look up the real, reasonable antenna designs and make an actual antenna and it will work even better with roughly the same effort. If you're going to do some DIY work, make a good antenna instead of a crap one.
Loop the copper wire into the extending antenna hole, then solder it, this gives you a mechanical connection
Using a splitter reduces signal by 3.5 db - 1/2 your signal is lost. You also get losses through impedance mismatch. Typical airwaves antenna z is 300 ohm, CATV equipment is 75 ohm. I would get a better signal by licking my finger and sticking it into my ear.
🤣
Not like the one shown that is 7db loss or technically 2 split split again
20+ years as catv systems designer as well as 40 years as rf hobbiest
I like that!
AND TWICE THE SIGNAL IF YOU LICK THE OTHER HAND FINGER AND STICK IT IN YOUR OTHER EAR. THEN TURN AROUND IF YOU NEED A BETTER SIGNAL.
@@tedmed7349 nah.. He would have better luck with the reception with the other finger up the glory hole..
Maybe try the right toe in the left ear also..
To make this work you will need a flux capacitor andSonic screwdriver
It’s the Libyans
The flux only if you want to see the future channel 🤣
Years ago I got creative and I used a dual splitter and stuck 2 darts in them. Reception was 50% better
That's getting right "to the point" of the matter! 🙄😁👍👍
Might seem like a good idea and 10 points for trying this out, BUT given the 10dB tap loss on the 4 taps, you might have done way better just with folding the shield back and having the inner core exposed, thereby constructing a simple dipole antenna.
Been faster just going to Walmart and pick me a $10 antenna.
As a lifelong avionics tech & have tinkered with many antennas & arrays at home I have to throw the B.S. flag on this one. Something as simple as a cheap set of old skool rabbit ears will work better for digital/ hd
Neophyte scenario/question:
Someone has plenty of terminals, shielded cable and unshielded wire. Can they just solder a T antenna with a 1 meter unshielded top bar and an arbitrary length shielded terminal connection for same-room placement?
If anything, you can turn it over for a cool spider 🕷
for fun, try putting a simple copper, Al wire in the antenna hole of the TV and after that compare the necessity for such (time wasting)constructions
you can build a much simpler antenna by simply take the isolation (both extern and intern) on a TV cable by 1m and simply connect with a normal TV connector
It's supposed to be UK got that wrong as well bro
@@scottdonnelly1669 from the video that one with this brilliant idea is from an Arab country...
@@MrQ454 cool
Cause didn't the West end of the ball to bully light word used intentionally the part them Arabs lived in therefore the gadgets they felly hud to come up with after the flattening s
He was a British person holiday
What the hell is that cobbledinput a double male to a double female to a 90 and a barrel could have just connected the coax direct to split eliminating any line seperation issues
Anyone who knows 2 cents about RF knows this is stupid. A 6 inch piece of copper wire connected to each leg of a 300/75 ohm line matching transformer and positioned horizontally opposing will perform better and is quicker, easier, less clunky, and cheaper to make.
butitdoesntlookcewl
Don't waste your time with this BS. By the time you use all of these small antennas welded to the splitter box. The amount of DB loss from the splitter and the small elements. You may get some local stations but this is not a powerful antenna by any means. You could probably buy a $20 piece of junk from Walmart that worked better. Nothing is free!
For those last few steps with all the extensions fastened to the splitter followed by the black cable, why not just hook the black cable directly to the splitter? Also at least one of those soldering jobs looked kind of flimsy.
This is why I came to comments! To see if anyone else asked this already. And you did! Why not connect that black cable directly to the blank spot on the splitter?? No idea why he added all those extensions
@@josephrubin5821 that's why I came to the comments but we didn't get answers 🤔
You'd get better results sticking a wire into the aerial socket on the tv. How about backing up what you've done with a polar chart? It's a con & can't believe people fall for this rubbish
That's why you have commented Go on it give it a go. Bet you cannot create a match box
@ken chunky actually have an antenna store that is why he is afraid this dude is going to put him out of business lol
If this actually worked, and I use "IF" very strongly, I would weld the antennas to the coax instead of soldering them. Plus my guess is that the broadcast towers are less than 10-15 miles away.
Why even waste money on those antennas. Just cut the coax the correct length to begin with. Also all those gender benders on the input are nonsense waste too. Well actually the whole thing is a waste of time and money. Just attach a 6 inch piece of wire to each leg of a 300/75 ohm line matching transformer and position them horizontally opposing. It's quicker, easier, less clunky, cheaper to make, and will outperform this nonsense contraption.
@@RazorStrap an rf technician out there I have20+ years as system tech in catv top 4 company as well as 40 hobby years with all levels rf
@@RazorStrap Hell, I built a UHF loop antenna out of speaker wire, cardboard, duct tape, and a paperclip, -- WITHOUT a transformer -- and I was reliably picking up analog signals from 50 to 70 miles away back in college. Granted, digital is a bit more fragile, but I bet I could still pull in the locals with that setup from that same location if I still lived there. This splitter idea is a waste of time and money, and wouldn't receive jack squat at that distance.
😀
I just used a paper clip and jammed it into the coaxial of the TV and it worked but don't tell it was the work company tv
What's the point of adding the FxF and MxM adapters on the one connection? It doesn't change the connection type or the polarity.
This dose not make a multi element antenna if anything it would reduce the signal you would have got just hooking one antenna to the coax with no splitter the signals would not add up they would cancel each other being out of phase add multipath interfearance and a host of other negatives like impedance mismatching etc.
Best thing to do with that is turn it upside down and say it's centipede art.
Hooked 5 different antenna to a splitter and scanned and get 85 channels in Minneapolis. Put an antenna amp in between splitter and set. Newer amps. act as smart devices at least some and they optimize the signal for the set.
Where's Radio Shack when you need one..
Thank you so much for sharing your knowledge!
Doesn't work correctly, it's missing the 75ohm transformer...
The best antenna is still the old rabbit ear antenna works on digital
This genius cant tell me nothing he don't know the difference between wire cutters and toe nail clippers!!
Way to innovate! Just curious, what country are you in?
Way to innovate and spread bullshit!
This will never work. Unless I saw the video incorrectly, all the terminals and antennas are in the TAP = output and the cable from TV's input is connected to the splitter's input. That does not work. To make this effective, the IN needed a "source" another copper antenna or to be connected to an areal external antenna, and all the TAP needed to be linked (soldered) to the OUT effectively combining all the outputs into a "boosted" single output which will then be connected to the TV. This video is just a plain lie.
All these 'super powerful' TV antenna videos are crap. Just made-up nonsense by people who have no idea.
I think this is bullshit as well. Did you notice that rectangular box with a cable coming out of it stuck to the TV? I've seen stuff like this before where they try to make fools out of people. Remember the idiot who claims to pick up digital channels with CDs?
@@100PercentOS2 The CD's are digital to begin with. Of course they get a digital signal ;)
Try that with an Analog tv. Never seen White Noise so clear, mine even has closed captioning Saying “Shhhhhhhh”
🤫 don’t let this secret out.
Ahahaa nobody works more with an analog system but digital system…
Pleaae in what time are you living for?😜
Couldn't you just take the last elbow male-to-female adapter and screw it directly on the output? Or even bypass the elbow itself, really. Unless maybe you need the 2 inch extension for some reason. It probably doesn't matter in this case with a strong signal, but every extra connection in that chain attenuates the signal a little.
Thank goodness for the fast-forward button.
Yeah works okay IF you are within 20 miles of the transmitter tower
Salut . . . mais l'antenne capte seulement sur le toit ou en étage et pas au rez de chausser . . . non ???
you must own stock in a worthless tv parts company. just stab a long copper wire into the input jack and make a loop. done in two minutes.
I suppose there is a reason for not connecting the wire directly to the splitter? Is this video made in India?
(Four months later) Please wait while we connect you to an available technician.
OK THIS ANTENNA IS INTERESTING I AM GOING TO MAKE IT AND TEST IT ON MY CHANNEL..... THANK YOU!
so, the video is another language, the title is english and most of the comments on tiktok are usually the same language as the video this is confusing
hi,..great knowledge u have,.. i love it,..can it apply on paid channels in my decorder? i want to watch paid channels,..specially soccer kindly help...
Don't need when you have a smartscreen TV, I stream all of my TV channels and even wrestling through the internet
Your absolutely right. SMART TV awu to go, And u can do away with the dish type survive and save $100.00 to $200.00 dollars a month to buy gas to go to work with. Thank Ya Joe
Why one Antenne on OUT?
I'd just buy an antenna for probably less than it cost to make that POS.
Very ture, $49.00 dollars at Wall Mart comes a router, controller to turn the antenna with 41 channels all day long at 18 feet off the ground.Just try to get it mounted as close to 30 feet off the ground as you . You hook up a dvd recorder/player/Blue Ray to record any and all programs you may want to watch or save for later No dish
@@tomm9860 ([o[ooö
What type or Brand Soldering Iron (it looked solid black from what I could tell) are you using in this video? I like it. I want to purchase one like it or similar. Thank you! Bart
KATSU 852D
What Is The range of this antena? I have one that’s 18’ x 20’ long and picks up 100 miles, which is what I need. My works great, this one? Jim
Oh, should get at least 200 miles. If you live on top of Mount Everest.
How far away are you from the broadcasting towers. I have a neighbor who is an electrical engineer and he built your little antenna and it did not pick up any channels that are 54 miles away from our city.
Even a paper clip will pick up something
Your neighbour couldn't be much of an electrical engineer if he didn't recognise this bullshit video!
@@clancambo5297 There are a few who are legitimate, but most videos from India that involve building anything electrical or electronic are fake. I just watch for the Indian hands and listen for the Indian music, then stop, go back to the link and click "don't recommend this channel" They don't care what anyone thinks. Look at all the views they get until the people catch on.
If your friend who built this was an engineer, he must have been a mechanical engineer, an electrical engineer would not waste his time on this.
HA HA
Yeah,,,,right.....in city areas I can a picture using wet string and a coke can too...
The guy is such a fake. Buy rabbit ears and save all the trouble locating the parts and building it.
@@johntiggleman4686 ghhj
@@angelinabalbas7977 ghhj? Try again.
I even use a carrot for it 🤭
Cool concept brother! Thanks!
How well does it work? The antenna elements don't appear long enough to effectively receive UHF, and there will be loss through the splitter.
Relatively not very well.
Loss yep on a splitter like that 5 way you may as well say 10 db loss chances are the n presenter is within mileof any transmitting tower and a piece coax laidon floor connected directly to tv would do better
@@RazorStrap strip the shield and dialectic to bare stinger the shield does what it says " shield" the wire reducing. Signal at that point
It does not work at all whatsoever. Zero signal is about how well it works.
@@rpwolfe72 HA HA
Great idea let me try to make one, i have some splitters i dont use, thanks for sharing this video.
Good luck with that...
Just noticed that splitter is strictly distribution only one true output and 4 tap offs or reduced lel to allow out put more pass through basically if 20 DB sig went in input the tap offs would possibly allow 2 out each and the pass through out put would probly be 15
Designed for lines say going through a hotel and at every 4 rooms you place one to " tap for the 4 rooms and then extend throughoutput to next group of 4 1950 60 technology!!! I have replaced hundreds of those overly years as system tech in top 4 catv company
Gee... I wonder what a 20 dB loss does to Noise figure...my guess is raise it by 20 dB..LOL
@@daleanthony6091 unless amplified the noise floor does not increase as useable signal decreases ,it just stays there and the pure signal drops to it's level
Giving impression of increase
Spent 40 years in the biz. this is BS in the first degree.
Congratulations now you can watch commercials.
Better results with a paper clip.
In 90s I use to stick a needle directly into my TV antenna output.Saw my naghbours channels,it was like 7 channel s I managed to catch from his parabol.🤣
hes probably less than a kilometer/Mile from the signal, I have a substantial 75 mile antenna on my roof most of the TV stations transmission towers are around 40 miles and I only get 2 stations without the antenna amplifier with I get around 25 stations
Is it possible for all type of TV set especially old model?
This is the Terminator´s Antenna
It will be dead if there's lightning strike
.....and I thought that the scene off of the movie "War Game's" was false, when that kid turned that Pringles can into a supersonic, bionic, chronic, electronic, high colonic powerful antenna to listen in on his adversaries with......it was OverKill! By the way how do make a sled out of a cardboard box....you don't!
So l need 5 radio antennas 😒 huh .?
Nothing on TV worth watching anyway. The internet is way better.
Is this possible in Bangladesh
I say it's bullshit he needs to show the wire connected to the back of the TV and it always hunging off the table so he might have a cable hook to the TV
I made this and it works great, but I can't get any stations speaking English... 😁
That is rich indeed
Instead of that I used real tv antennas into a splitter and pointed each one to different cities. Then 15db amplifier on the combined signal. Got amazing results with favorable atmospheric conditions.
I listen to short wave ....I hate to rely on the atmospheric interference ....sxzeerrre
What were the antennas you used ?
Hola soy eletrisita y me gusta la eletronica
This guy must be trying to dump a bunch of splitters and coaxial connectors on eBay or Amazon.
Smart guy
What the heck in Goat Herding is this!?!
The gain is ? The polar pattern is ? The impedance is ? I love a good joke
The gain is probably somewhere in the negative region and the impedance will be all over the place. As for the polar pattern I doubt anyone could predict it! But as long as the local TV mast is in your back yard you'll be OK...
This channel has a lot of time wasting projects - must be to hope get some earning with youtube ads - I like the word "powerful" whatever that means - it is a favorite word in these projects
No kidding what a waste of time
@@bobh.4580 mop
there is a lot of haters in the comments good cartoon give him a break
I live in a city.. I tried a 25 dollar antenna but I'm getting limited channels.
I got a cheap antenna for 5 dollars and I was able to get 87 channels.
Looks like a heck of a lot of work
Pointless work. Better buy a cheap rabbit ears than to waste time finding a splitter, the coax cable, the F connectors, the extendable antennas...he's just clearing out his junk box parts. He is no "Pro." I come here to rip on him and his idiot projects.
And it only receives local broadcasts. It's rubbish.
@@andyhowlett2231 dag that's cold. I have a RCA indoor antenna and it has a amplifier for better reception.. I get 80 channels.
@@michaelwyckoff7593 Yours works because it is properly designed and has an amplifier. This one is just a pile of junk with no amplifier. That's why it's rubbish.
@@andyhowlett2231 maybe you are right. But trust me it was not easy to get the setup to really work as good as it does. Of course there are some channels that are rubbish.lol. But the few OTA channels I do watch come in very good. If you look around people can find a good reasonably priced indoor antenna. The main reason I have an antenna hooked up is because I refuse to pay for OTA channels that are free. Cable makes a fortune charging people for OTA channels.
NOTE TO SELF, PURCHASE PAIR OF WIRE STRIPPERS!!! 😂 😆
HAY WHERE IS THE POWER SUPPLY AMPLIFIER SPLITTERS NEED 27 VOLTS
Toe nail clipper action......
NO NO NO…!!!
Just about anything will work if you’re only a couple miles or so away from the broadcast antenna.
That thing will never pick up a signal from 50 miles away.
are all the adaptors on the input side meant to baffle us with science....it didn't work... why did you use toenail clippers to cut wire very amusing
This is a waste of time. Just connect a 2 or 3 ft piece of wire to the ant input. No different.
Take it from me a 40 year veteran in broadcast radio and TV engineering.
thanx alot for the idea
how close are the tv towers to you
I'm having problems with same hack I have done diy with different splitter but nothing happen
Not bad ,for a Wookie !
Congratulations for being a professional joker.
Wow! Amazing! Some cheap parts, a soldering iron and the cable companies are out of business. Well there is the problem of physics. But perhaps in Morocco electromagnetic radiation follows different laws. If this passes for good technical advice in Morocco it goes a long way to explaining some third world problems. But maybe people who did not get a good education can be forgiven for posting the attaboy comments on Sat Pro's videos. But maybe they will read the comments and start to wonder and then begin to ask questions and then maybe even start to educate themselves. Maybe, perhaps, we can at least hope. Kudos to those who took the time to point out some of the flaws in this silly video.
I would say more, but my Amazon delivery is here with the gas saving water injector, the 200 mile antenna booster, and a special plug that reduces the electric bill to zero. Then I have to reply to that letter from the Nigerian Minister of Finance.
I am sorry, but I am so deeply saddened by this video.
Where In The World There Still Is Analog Signal For A Tv? :D
Signal loss from each connector screwed together on input side of splitter....plus, signal loss from splitter itself. Better idea would be to unwind a thousand foot length of copper wire from the back of an old CRT TV tube, then, connect one end to the TVs antenna input center hole, while marching up to the roof with the other end. While standing in the center of the roof, gently insert the end of the wire deep inside the colon, passing through the anus , until a sharp pain is felt near the liver. Wait quietly for a thunderstorm to arrive to alleviate the pain permanently, while your family enjoys crisp 4K images below in your TV room !
Brilliant!
I'ma try this...
Will that antenna only in india or all over the world?
it works only in your dreams
It will work only for T2 technology, which is not so common in India, so far.
My landlord pays for my cable & internet service. It actually works better than this 👍🏻👍🏻
Pura magia, excelente
That's not how you prep cable for connectors dude.
I am satellite cable technician with 40 years of experience using splitter to connect multiples TV this will drop the signal this is lies. Wasting ur time.
Bro, using your experience, please make a simple and fruitful antenna and post it's vdo.
Cool stuff.
maybe work in big city, not in suburban homes
or just buy a cheap antenna?
That’s pretty low rent using dull ass toe nail clippers for diagonal cutters.
It's good? Loss: -8 dB or -12dB! :-)
'Almost everything' can work as an antenna. But if you get the equipment and measure it, it's still just a crappy antenna. Look up the real, reasonable antenna designs and make an actual antenna and it will work even better with roughly the same effort.
If you're going to do some DIY work, make a good antenna instead of a crap one.
Lock of details, it means waste of money on
What utter and complete bullshit
Exactly. This guy has about 8 different channels, and all are crap projects. Some are outright fakery.
@@johntiggleman4686 Yeah but he's making money...
@@joelkist6493 yeah, that's what bugs me the most. 🤬
toe nail clippers, buy some Klein's
what a joke. never work.... plus all the aimless adapters waste of time
I like this video and comment becoz I love the voice of Azan in background .. Masha Allah
Megusta aser muchos inbento asi uy bueno su trabajo