The Comparison of Apache vs Indian built LCH. who wins ?
Vložit
- čas přidán 21. 08. 2021
- The Comparison of Apache vs. Indian built LCH. who wins ?
The two helicopter which known for its significant multifunction's capacity that makes it more deadly superior for war. Apache was introduced in the year 1981 in US air force whereas LCH was made its first flight on 2010. for more info watch video do let us know your thoughts about both helicopters.
#LCH #apache #comparison #aircraftvsaircraft #defense #helicopter #fighter helicopter #USA #India #IAF #HAL #hindustanaeronauticlimited
Boeing AH-64 Apache (Aircraft Model), Helicopter (Invention), Combat, in flight, in action, rockets, missiles, Machine Gun (Invention), destruction, blast, explosion, shooting, firing, takeoff, landing, flying, Aviation (Industry), military, military videos, military training, military exercise, armed forces, soldiers, military tribute, troops, Troop (Armed Force), Soldier (Profession), gun tape, gun camera, blue sky,
アパッチ, Apache, AH-64, AH-64D アパッチ・ロングボウ, AH-64D Apache Longbow, アパッチ・ロングボウ, 攻撃ヘリコプター, attack helicopter, ヘリコプター, 兵器搭載, Weapons Load, 砲撃, Gunnery, アメリカ陸軍, US Army, 自衛隊, 軍事, ミリタリー, Military, AH-64D - Jak na to + styl
FUN FACT : INDIA GOT BOTH OF THEM..🙂
LOL! True!....
Apaches been in service since vietnam war days in US....
but i think india army uses lch in just a very small no. less than 10 i think
@@youngsheldon8949 The Order will be 15 and their main action point would be the Himalayas and North East. If the performance is really good, the army might get more in the future.
@@youngsheldon8949 10 years down the line the Indian military would have around 150 LCH, and only 37 Apaches.
@@rohitb5834 instead of those 37 apaches i think we can have 120 more lch and that would more better
Wow 😮 very impressive respect India 🇮🇳 from Somalia 🇸🇴✌🏽
Ty bro. Nigeria is on talks with India they are buying near about 12 or more lch
❤️❤️
😍🥰😘
💗💗💗💗💗
thanks from indian..
LCH is made for high altitude Himalayan warfare.....India struggled to hit the 7km high altitude Pakistanis position with Russian attack helicopters with load in kargil war 1999 that's made LCH for its own interest ....Apache is heavy attack helicopter
Exactly! These two will compliment each other well in indian service. However they do serve two fundamentally different roles.
🤣🤣🤣 vitamin protein ...creativity level 1000000🤣
why u need helicopter just for Himalayan region, why not use fighter jets there?
@@bhauri per flight cost of fighter jet is way more than helicopter
@@bhauri and why should we use fighter jets ?? In Himalayas ??
Go India!!! Respect from the USA here! You'll need the right tools for the right job and the right environment!
when you look at price diffrence , LCH is a true futuristic beast, also you forgot to maintain LCH has less radar cross section as compared to apache which makes LCH more safe from enemy missiles, also in the video service ceiling of Apache is shown wrong its less than 20k feet, The only reason India made LCH because Indian needs to monitor over the Himalayas and LCH can fly over peaks of the top mountains but Apache cant do that at all.
LCH is for high altitude wars and it is ultimate in its class. Apache is very lethal in low altitude wars. Both are different class helicopter. That why India acquired both.
kuch vi😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@Noah1803 Y Fake id spotted, keep barking , no one cares 🤣🤣🤣,
Dude that is pure fan fiction. How the hell do you know LCH has a lesser RCS than the Apache? Neither are Stealth Helicopters and will show up on the radar regardless. The EW suite in Apache Guardians is superior. Trust LCH is a our beast, but it is not in the same category as Apache.
There is about 100 meter ceiling difference between the Apache India flies and the LCH. However, the Apache can operate drones so altitude and range are based on the performance of the drone. The Apache D has a lower ceiling, but India has the Apache E.
LCH is designed for high mountains and it is a king there definitely on plains apache excel
lch for killing civil people apache for real wars
@@kayacenk4164 this isn't a Chinese comment section mate.... You're in the wrong place xD
@@kayacenk4164 ur in a wrong zone bro...its not antinational sector..
@@kayacenk4164 how clowny can a human get?
Apache has 21000 feet of service ceiling, it's quite high..
Apache indeed a beast and awesome capabilities but in mountain warfare at high altitude LCH would perform better
Thats why india use both helicopters
@@oiitsme2501 bruhv!! He said that apache is a beast. Are you dumb or you just can't read
Spot on! LCH was built for mountain warfare, unlike the US Apache
@@argamer6660 calm down fan boy
@@Z_1917 the apache has been fighting in the mountains of Afghanistan for 20 years. its battle hardened on the plains or in the mountains. the LCH is no where near as good.
Lch is light heli and apache is medium heli but performance according to requirement of lch is 🔥🔥
apache is heavy weight fighter
And LCH costs only one third
@@anshulsingh8326 but they actually said that it weighs less (around 3000kg less)
Aren't heavy helis supposed to be physically heavy as well
@@Dhksksjjsjjs it's hevi cuz it carries heavier payload and is versatile in its field. And the new lch is a light helo which is only suitable for mountain warfare so comparing the two is plain stupidity
Hahahahhshahahshs freaking😆
Both have a different design due to the difference between the tasks they are meant for. The Apache was designed as a heavy survivable helicopter to stem the red hordes on the plains of Europe. The LCH as a light attack and reconnaissance helicopter for high altitude and hot/humid conditions.
Yes
Absolutely true 👍
LCH can perform anti tank role too
It is not just a reconnaissance heli
@@durgeshsss it carries too few weapons to deal with large numbers of armoured vehicles. That isn't a problem at high altitude where armour is useless but they can't handle the desert terrain as a large caliber bullet will take it out and it has a very limited amount of weapons. If you bothered to read the whole thing you would have read it in my comment the high altitude and hit-humid attack function.
LCH is designed to operate at sub-zero temperatures in the Himalayas.
Apache is a warthog on the battlefield but lch is designed to attack on mountains as in 1999 kargil war india realised that they require a attack helicopter for such areas.
Both play different roles
This is just an example of growing up of "Atmanirbhar Bharat", 🌟🌟🌟🌟💐💐🔥🔥🔥💐💐💐💐💜💜💙💙💜💖💚
Jai hind jai bharat..........
Jai India
The error in the weight of these helicopters is in the commentary at about 2:50. It should be the opposite of what was said since Apache is significantly heavier than LCH. Otherwise, this is a good video 👍🏼
Error in the height too
how can a commentator make that error, can only be deliberate.
The Max takeoff weight for the LCH is 5,800kg. The primary mission weight for the Apache E is 6,800 kg with the maximum weight being 10,400 kg.
Yes he said that in reverse 😬
That is what confused me. Thanks
Lch is light attack heli and Apache is medium. LCH was designed to fight in the mighty himalayas where the average peak height is around 6.5 km.
What Naik are you?
@@Poppushopu y do u want to know?
@@siddhinaik6650 because iam too Naik just got curious to know what Naik you are 😅
No helicopter can reach the heights of above 6000 meters or anywhere near, however light. The air is too thin.
@@Amory98 yeah this heli has a service ceiling of 5000 m when fully loaded, dude it has about 1400SHP dual turboshaft engines while the Apache has 1900SHP dual config(similar) and has a service ceiling of 5900m without payload. In the testing phase of LCH, they did the landing on a post which was at 4800m elevation, so it can definitely hover at 5000m, and maybe above 5000m if its running on its cruising speed
I'm an Indian and im gonna be honest. The LCA is no match to the Apache, but its a marvellous effort and it's going to give us a much more valuable lesson. Although, India has already bought a few Apaches, I hope we spend more on research and improve the Prachand on the same levels of the legendary Apache, esp, the long bow variant. I've been watching and an absolute fan of the Apache and to know that its very much possible that we may build something similar, it's an incredible feeling.
LCH is obviously winning against Apache when operating in high altitude region. Remember how Apache performed in the mountain area, LCH is optimized for that, from every perspective. Respect to LCH designers and engineers.
HAL is bringing India into next level with their engineering excellence and a low cost making charge
Love from Bharat (India) ❤️🇮🇳
I am impressed by lch
LCH primarily is developed for high altitude missions. You can call it china centric. As tensions flair between both countries, LCH is becoming more relevant. Galwan clash has changed everything. China has clearly chosen a path and India (after years of warning signs) knows who is the real enemy.
Both are different category helicopter, both are designed for totally different type of warfare..
Lch is lighter than apache
That's why it's called lch
😂
Ur genius u should be given nobel awards
@@nithish1215 😂😂😂
Just look at the price difference Apach is 2.5 times costlier. Im sure LCH can be fitted with various bombs and guns. LCH also flies higher and further. Not much in the speed department just a little faster is the Apache. I believe the LCH wins purely because of its flight ceiling and range and cost. Armaments can be added to both.
The Apache can be a multi target weapon system. Six Apaches can destroy 96 enemy vehicles, with friendlies mixed in with them, in under 3 minutes. No other weapon system can do that.
@@orlock20 apache can not fly above Himalayas. Both r ment for completely different missions
@@appusangha6069 There are areas in the Himalayas that the Apache can be at, but it looks like the replacement has a very low ceiling. Also the Apache can use drones to go at any elevation and shoot Brimstone 2 missiles with a range of 40 km.
@@orlock20 you know what, apache has its own advantages and lch has its own, but as every country is not USA you cannot operate systems like apache for everything, and it isnt great for everything as well. apaches are not meant to operate in extream high altitude environments and why make adjustments and additions of about 5 million dollar to a 35 mil dollar heli just so that you can make it operate decently better at higher altitutes, rather just get 3 10-15 mil dollar helis made specifically for the task and will out perform the apache in such conditions
also high apaches can only operate with half as much payload at higher altitudes so they have less weapons then the lch then
@@ansshsharma6299 each helicopter has their own specialties and disadvantages, theyre made for two completely different missions so there isnt any point in comparing them
Both are good but made for different purposes.
Indian one was made for high Altitude war zone in Himalayas.
US one was mde for multiple role.
Dude Apache is heavier and it is a Medium weight heavy support helicopter while LCH is a lightweight and support helicopter designed considering the Himalayan terrain in consideration.
The two helicopters are different in sizes, power, weight capabilities, technology, radars, weapon payloads and meant for different missions. There's absolutely no comparison between them and India buying both of them is meant to compliment each other NOT to replace either
Lch is light category and that's why it's beast in category 🇮🇳😎
Jai Hind
Apache is heavyweight and LCH is lightweight, maintainance cost is very high in case of Apache, while LCH can do the same that an Apache can do with a low budget and low maintainance. LCH is designed for high altitude warfare in Himalayan region, in high altitude war Apache is less effective because of it's weight.
Apache cost is US$35 million & LCH cost is US$14 million think india is giving competition to Apach in very Cheap cost also Apache is medium combat helicopter and LCH is light combat helicopter. HAL LCH 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Both are best in class and we proud on both of them
The Apache is a heavy attack helicopter where as the HAL LCH is a light attack helicopter. So comparing the two doesn't make any sense.
Kinda like comparing Apple and Rose. Both serve not only different purposes, but are from completely different background altogether.
I agree
Agree with you brother
So true
Also the terrian in which they are specialized is also different, lch king of mountain and high altitudes and apache king of plains and desert area
LCH is unbelievable cost, superb
Though the Apache may outperform the LCH, the LCH gives far greater bang for the buck than the Apache.
When it comes to Warfare....Killer machines wud alwz b considered better than Value for Money machines
@@AKumar-fc6ek definitely no have ever read history Germany was defeated by the Soviet Union with there shear number of tank rather then concentrating on quality they went for quantity that what made them win the war
@@harshithhitman9924 quantity is a quality itself
@@Aasmaan34519 not in case of Soviet Union they prioritised shier quantity where in case Germany mainly went for higher quality and expensive tanks so Soviets use the tactics of sending 91 tanks against 1 tiger tanks once the tiger tank runs out of it amo the last remaining tank will get behind it's back where the armor is thin and knock it out
Yeah the advantages is that the Apache carries the high payload
India have both helicopters 🇮🇳🇮🇳🚩🚩🚩❤️❤️
This is just an example of growing up of "Atmanirbhar Bharat".. Great initiative by the Modi government..
In the graphic, they showed that lch weighs about 3000Kg less than the Apache but while narrating they claim that lch weighs more than Apache by 3000 Kg.
Indian government should push for lch, it is inhouse and highly capable machine.
Two are different class no comparison lch is best in mountanious hilly terrain
but surely light machine is more manurable?
@@sinatra7407 its depends on engine power engine to weight thrust ratio aerodinamics
Apache is arguably the best attack helicopter in the world.. and LCH is arguably the undisputed king of maountains... The combination of both makes Indian airforce ground attack team an unstoppable force.
...
In 35 million we can have 3 LCH .and its very easy for 3 LCH to finish one appacchi .love for LCH and INDIA
The Apache can attack multiple targets at once leading to higher damage on the enemy while staying on the front lines for shorter periods of time increasing its survivability.
"Despite being 1 meter shorter than the LCH the apache has a broader wingspan and is significantly taller"..Are you on drugs?? Than again the video says the apache is 3000kgs lighter than LCH this after they have shown the empty weight for both choppers..bruh..
India got both of them and also the legendary Mi-35 from Russia. Triad of these 3 is just epic.
Great videos.. both great machines …in different fields
Having both is an advantage as they can be used depending on the requirement needed.
Can't compare- LCH is designed spcifically for high altitude mountain warefare
Keeping in view the prices, LCH is clearly ahead!
They serve a different role and they are different. Apachi is a medium heli whereas lch is a light heli. Comparing them is like comparing rose to an orange
The Apache can destroy 16 advanced T-72 tanks which cost a total of $32 million (without counting the cost of their ammo and fuel) using $3.2 million worth of missiles in a $35 million helicopter in under 3 minutes without exposing itself to the enemy. Not even the F-35 can do that.
@@orlock20 yes, it's a complete war Machine and comparing it to a light helicopter is clearly stupidity.
@22 Sayon Das IX B but America has the long bow Apache
@22 Sayon Das IX B no its has the Apache Guardian version not the long bow. Only the US and Britian have the long bow
The apache flies over my house daily, what a machine!
um hi but where do u live which country?
@@shikarshik2238 Thats classified war intel 😝😜🤣
@@shikarshik2238 i saw a Apache helicopter from my house . I think they were going for independence day parade . It's just 🔥
And lch always parking in garage 😎
I saw an Apache crash one block over from where I live. Daily, what a piece of it.
LCH is purpose built to fight the Chinese and Pakistan armies in the inhospitable heights of the Himalayas. If it accomplishes that job well, that's all it's supposed to do. But it's still not battle proven. Apache has a successful track record and is kinda sitting world champion of attack helicopters. This comparison makes not much sense.
If war comes definitely there will use this helicopter lol.
My stomach is killing me. Let's just say it's a fight between an adult and a child.
The Apache helicopter, which has been continuously upgraded by accumulating and researching numerous data while traveling to various conflict zones and battlefields for decades, is incomparable to anything else.
High altitude is missing in apache
@@jetlee5388 that’s why india has lch 😊 to kick pla garbage booty in Himalayas since it flies higher 😂
The Apache was designed and built over 40 years ago and can take on any of todays strongest helicopters. If thats not impressive, I dont know what is!!
You just compared a heavy attack helicopter with a light combat helicopter, I haven't even watched the video but I already know which ones gonna win lol
LCH ~2250 kgs weighs ~40% of Apache which weight ~5200 kgs
Very Good comparison.I am not making your efforts little by just giving only a like. 50 thumbs up are not enough for your this hard work.
Lch is the most good looking attack helicopter🚁 in the world 🌎
Thanks for sharing details 👍🏻👍🏻!! Apache is the best best no doubtly, look at her engine. Hal (actually IAF) was seeking for higher service ceiling for Siachen battlefield as IAF had faced difficulty during Kargil conflict. That's the very first production. After mass production and user, it will be definitely improved. Right now LCH must be equipped with lethal weapons... 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
One of the most unbiased comparison. Thank you🌹🌹🙏❤
Both are awesome and most important thing india got both.... Love usa from India
Nowadays Apaches are exclusive used by Talibans in Afghanistan.
How can Apache weigh less than lch? That done seem right
I am impressed that LCH is almost 1/3 rd the cost of Apache while at the same time has very good capabilities .
I'm an Indian and Indians want robust , dependable, indestructible but cheap technology.
Funfact :- India have Both !! 🤣🤣🤣
The real test would be in Ladakh and the Himalayas in the war against China, very proud of LCH
As an Indian, I was quite surprised that Hal comes out with a handsome attack helicopter with decent performance. Can’t say about the Hal Tejas or Arjun tank. The price is outrageous to say the least. Foreign vendors would think low price means low quality and performance. Actually Indian products are cheap due to cheap labour and low goods prices
Both r of different class helis and r topnotch 🔥🔥
These two helicopters are designed for different purposes . I am very proud to be an Indian . HAL and DRDO have made us proud .
You did not compare the latest variant of the Apache. The AH-64E Guardian upgrade has increased the Apache's capabilities which includes controlling drones from the cockpit of the AH-64E Guardian.
LCH is built for the high altitude warfare were heavyweight attack helicopter can't able to operate
@@billuji5851 Good luck fighting a 4.5 gen fighter BVR at altitude.
@@teddyballgame4823 maybe that's the reason hch has the tracking range of 700 km.
@@atulmishra7738 I do not think so at the low altitude it is able to reach compared to a jet.
@@teddyballgame4823 @Teddyballgame Did you meant J20 being 4.5 Generation 😂. Anyway chopper are not meant to fight against fighters.
very good info
Hello, You showed the weights of the two helicopter on screen and then when you read them out you said the opposite so which is it?
LCH ( Light combat helicopter ) is specially designed for mountain warfare in Himalayas because of its less weight LCH is better in mountainous range
Now make HAL Rudra vs HAL LCH ⚡
Surely the skill of the pilot and crew are the most important features
3 Indian choppers, or 1 American Apache. Hmmm......tough choice!
The Apache has has been COMBAT tested in all combat hardened readiness situations & strategies. The LCH has not, but, it's an impressive experimental aircraft, still to be tested in battle ... That's the answer to which is best, regardless of their capabilities or components ...
Just for battle-tested proof & arm marketing, we can't destroy other middle-east countries . It takes part in Various " YUDH ABHYAS "(BATTLE EXCERCISES) with various countries & Even combined exercises of Air,Navy&Army of India .
Compare ufo jf17 blunder block 99 with falcon 9
Why do the stats on the voice-over not match those in the visual at several points in the video?
Lch very impressive 👍🇮🇳🙏
7:36 point where all discussions end 🤣🤣 and Finally Everyone know who's the Best ❤️🇮🇳
They are different heli and have different roles 😑
The apachi is a medium attack heli and the lch is a light attack heli which is a big difference
LCH is mountain lion Apache is land Lion...
Slowly and steadily we will work hard and attain the big level of being super power .... Long live India ... Long live world...
Yess
We have both and this what makes this video interesting.
LCH helicopter is for mountain area fight
Hands down Apache! No other weapons platform in its category has a combat and operation experience in a day in day out on a daily bases. Until the LCH has proven it self in combat at home and abroad….It can not be considered as a better platform!
drmdmd1
LCH is flying at altitudes of 20000 feet, where Indian combat zones exist. It is designed "specifically" for such heights & that is what counts for India.
@@MrPoornakumar well said. Apache can't compete there
At 20000 feet .. Apache is out of the game already 😂
Great..nice..
See your video was detailed but make a video o f 35 and euro fighter typhoon please.
Yess we will
Poor audio editing , can't hear analysis commentary just loud music .
It's louder then commentary
Bro, LCH is lighter than Apache, I don't why you said Apache is 3180 kg lighter than LCH. :D
Yea go for the visuals
They somehow make sense
Made a mistake while recording the Audio i guess
@@SharmaTech914 it's other way round.
Name changed mistakenly during audio shoot.
Apache...because it's battle tested and kicks ass!!!
in the video few given data about the helicopters are narrated incorrect.eg.specs for apache said to be for lch and vice versa
Nice trick to attract Indian subscribers 😂
Cannot compare as they are in a different weight classes.
When will LCH fly inverted liike the AH-64 although it may not be an operational requirement
@2:48 Wait. The Apache weighs less than the LCH? But @2:18 you just showed the empty weight of both copters: Apache=5,165kg v. LCH=2,250kg. I'm confused. What did I miss?
The Apache’s ‘war resume’ speaks for itself above nearly every other internationally designed and built attack helicopter. What is the point of this comparison? Who would win in an air-to-air confrontation, or who would boast better results when unleashed on a battlefield scenario?
Great question. A head to head combat between these two machines is unlikely given who owns them at the moment. But then again, such a comparison will never be true since pilot and ground support skill/tech levels are never the same, and that's always half the story.
The Apache hasn't been tested in war in the Himalayas(high altitude). The lch is known to have flown a cargo of 600Kg and landed at a height of 22500 feet. I won't be so sure about Apache winning if the battle took place at a height more than 20K feet.
First of all, Attack helis dont do air to air combat. It's main objective is to provide ground support to troops and eliminate tanks and armored vehicles. And the 2nd thing, LCH is way cheaper than apache. This LCH is for high altitude combat, It has more service ceiling than apache. india is also developing HCH (heavy combat heli).
2:51
more than the LCH*
Speechless after seeing the video thumbnail🐯
LCH for its price could be a market creator for Indian arms exports punches above weight with excellent avionics.
Well considering the price difference,
1 Apache 🇺🇲 vs 5 LCH 🇮🇳, it's quite evident who would win.
Jai Hind!
Lch.
If battlefield is Siachein.
Because the advantage is of ceiling height.
Isn't the radar antenna on the Apache for below horizon battlefield advantage of remaining out of exposure?
It's about time the likes of India pulled its weight militarily and started investing its massive wealth to develop the next generation vehicles and weapons rather than relying on the USA, UK and France. If the LCH is as good as they make out then it's a great start.
rippenburn
A good, positive suggestion.
Impressive 👑❤