Jesse Lee Peterson's Bonkers Interview with Jeet Heer
Vložit
- čas přidán 25. 06. 2024
- The crew watches and admires Jeet's patience as Jesse lobs insane talking points at him with breathtaking efficiency, at one point even arguing the slavery wasn't that bad.
Follow Ben on Twitter: @BenBurgis
Follow GTAA on Twitter: @Gtaa_Show
Become a GTAA Patron and receive numerous benefits ranging from patron-exclusive postgames every Monday night to our undying love and gratitude for helping us keep this thing going:
patreon.com/benburgis
Read the weekly philosophy Substack:
benburgis.substack.com
Visit benburgis.com
This is fucking awesome.
This almost comes off as a parody. If you didn't know the guy, you would think that this is some sort of comedy skit.
off
@@ZER0-- Do you feel better now? Will you sleep tonight ffs?
15:09 “it’s kinda stupid to analyze what he’s saying.” Is essentially the headline.
OMFG. How is this real?!
Jesse acknowledged that slaves had to get married in secret using a secret ritual. I feel like it was a missed opportunity to completely dismantle his argument for slavery.
07:20 - Canadian ?
07:25 - Black faces walking around Canada ?
08:20 - Personally
08:29 - What if a black POTUS wore white face ?
People can’t believe how the truth hurts so all they can do is laugh. It’s clear from there facial expressions
I'm dying.
at least link the original content...wtf
09:29 - The NAACP is no good . . .
09:38 - I'm going to have to reject that
09:42 - Why ? I'm black
09:45 - NAACP was founded by W.E.B. DuBois
Bayduh! How anyone takes JLP seriously is astounding. Funny guy though.
Amazin
What does he say that’s not true?
I don’t think that it’s a bit. Pretty sure JLP was kicked in the head by a horse.
It’s only a bit in the sense that jlp is totally cynical.
He plays the dumb black guy that spews white supremacy & his white audience loves it
Is their a link to the original jlp video?
I don't understand what's wrong with someone blackening their face to portray a black persona or character. Except I have heard someone say something about making fun of black people, but no one wears it for that purpose, and it's really dumb and shitty that anyone would say that. They put it on to pretend to be a black character, what's the BFD?
The Wayans Brothers put on whiteface to play White Chicks, and no one freaked out but it's okay for anyone else to do it, right?
And Yes, it IS okay for ANYONE to do it. All this hysteria over stupid crap like that needs to stop.
Jeet is the man!
Jeet is the best
Man Jeet should have just come out as a Christian too
As hard as you guys are laughing now, is how hard I laughed when Jesse had Ben as a guest. czcams.com/video/FRDQsG43-TY/video.html
AMAZIN
Lol i would get myself canceled if i went on that show. I already have a bit of a problem having the sense of humor of an edgy 12 year old. This guy would take me over the top though.
It’s Freakin’ Jesse Lee Peterson. Bonkers is the only kind of interview he’s capable of. Remember “where does logic come from?”
Ben is still upset that JLP made him look like a fool a few years ago.
I’m thinking he had no clue who Jesse Lee Peterson was
Neither did Ben when he went on JLP's show
Ive never been able to tell if this is just a a character he plays.
Jlp has a special mind and I don't mean that as an insult
‘Mazing
I thought this guy went away when he was outed as one of them gays
Its a right of passage for all leftists to be privileged with an interview from jlp
that was hilarious
Fk me, it's Uncle Ruckus
100%
REM sucks, dude.
@@user-ii7fi7ln9n Someone's lost, dude.
@@mattgilbert7347 OK but REM still blows... Michael Stipe is pretentious and lame
@@user-ii7fi7ln9n This is "Give Them an Argument" with Ben Burgis CZcams channel. I don't know why you are talking about REM and Michael Stipe.
This panel is super beta
Jesse is the man!
Jesse is a deplorable individual
BETA!
Some Bull-Jeet
Peterson is a certified clown.
jeet implied aladdin was indian which is literal arabian erasure HOLD THIS MAN ACCOUNTABLE
Alladin was originally a chinese man and most of Arabian nights stories takes inspiration from Indian folktales
Such low level commentary. So because Trudeau is overall bad which nobody can deny that means he does nothing good which can be defended?? Basically if you take a stance defending him no matter the sibject your wrong because hes bad?? Tell me WHY the argument is bad not its bad because the guy he is defending is bad.
Hey, I really enjoyed your content. After your debate with Destiny, I am going to unsubscribe. What an incredibly bad faith discussion. Jesus, dude. WTF
Regards, years long subscriber
10:24 - But the NAACP wasn't founded by black people . . . founded by a white woman
10:31 - That's not true
10:38 - W.E.B. DuBois was not a white woman
12:00 - Guy with headphones is a poor listener
Peterson is dead wrong about borders. Borders function as political interventions against the free market imprisoning capital, goods, labour, and production. Abolishing borders - making the movement of capital, goods, labour and production 'frictionless', would double world GDP increasing it by around $ 100,000,000,000,000.00, one hundred trillion dollars according to the work of theoretical economists. In the case of Haiti removing barriers to the movement of labour allows skilled Haitian workers to increase their income by 100X. Freeing the market from the depredations of political intervention whether that intervention is of a democratic, socialist, communist, or libertarian stripe, is the surest way to prosperity for all.
Oh and BTW no borders = no states = no wars. What's not to like ?
Please explain how... any law works without borders.
How does tax work?
How does homosexual marriage work?
Literally any law that the world doesn't universally agree upon.
Thx in advance
@@chunksloth Sure. Law, like language, belongs to a class of institutions termed 'emergent', meaning they form not by individual human intention but rather by way of unintentional, dispersed, complex, collective processes. Such processes occur much faster than biological evolution but much slower than individual intentional design. Such law is sometimes termed 'natural' law, law without an author. Political authority can be said to have colonized this natural law, transforming law into a strategy of domination, sometimes termed 'positivist' law. Now think of language. There is no centralized, monopoly political authority producing and enforcing language yet language, the most critical of all institutions, continuously and spontaneously evolves, adapts, forming new words, new phrases, new idioms so on and so on. It is the same with natural law the difference being that natural law functions to prevent and when necessary peacefully resolves disputes. Interestingly you mention homosexual marriage. Now it is precisely under political / positivist law that homosexual relations were criminalized, that the state incarcerated homosexuals for the positivist 'crime' of misgendering themselves. Now of course political law is always contested, always up for grabs, the subjugated always maneuvering to arrogate political power to themselves in order to rework the positivist law deployed against them. And thus today positivist law still criminalizes misgendering but reworked to now flip the scripts.
Thats the most moronic thing I've ever heard😂
@@jeremylewis9819 That's all well and good however it would be helpful if you would reply by way of a more reasoned - and more detailed - counter argument👨🎓
@robertcarpenter8077 To believe no boarders no states would prevent war among mankind is absolutely moronic.
AMAZIN'!