Despite his career in the navy and his outdoor life, George VI was never robust. A stammering neurotic, he drank too much and smoked 60/day and in the last photos of him in February 1952 when he was 56y old, he looked haggard and 15y older. The four adult sons of George V were all in their different ways complete messes. Aristocratic upbringing always was, and to an extent still is, brutal
@@splinterbyrd Poor all of them. It's a far reach to assume they would've lived long b/c first they'd had to have a loving father who didn't call them "stammering fools" and predicting that would "ruin themselves within a year" of being king. George V manhandled them, so they were all nutty--Bertie stammered and chain-smoked, David smoked a lot too, stuttered a little, had tics, was manorexic and, you know the rest. George was a drug addict and bisexual. But if they had and didn't smoke, I think Bertie would've lived to 70s--maybe early 80--Edward ironically lived the longest despite dying of lung cancer from smoking at 77. Their sister had a heart attack at 65 and George died in a crash. I don't think George VI would've lived to be 96, like QE2. Probably 80 at best.
The best anecdote in this video was a brief conversation held by the king with a victim of the blitz, when he told him their home had been bombed as well. He replied, "Oh really? which one?".
@@ashmarie1881 Yeah, I edited it to be more accurately attributed towards the king of twats after his fair correction. Regardless of that however, they all were and still are massively entitled turds who deserve nothing but contempt! 😺
At the time of her funeral people were interviewed ordinary people in Windsor,everyone spoke highly of her some old ladies used have tea with her I found her s very nice interesting person
buenavistadream ............ In those days people who'd social-climbed-their--way-into-the-Royal-Family didn't want to be reminded of where they'd come from but at least she was honest by saying..... ." I'm not as nice as people think I am!".... .hmmmmmm just like someone we all know now?
@@gilgameshofuruk4060 Dont assume its an hour full of great things... sometime it’ll be your ruin, and you’ll be grateful it felled you in your older years instead of in your youth.
I worked with civil servants who maintained the royal residences. It was known as the Ministry of Works. One used to write the building standards for the whole of the UK. He said he went to Clarence House to assess building works to be completed there. He said his encounter with the Queen Mother was described as ‘a woman who smiled but held a steely eye stare that was quite frightening’. I fully appreciated how Diana must have felt.
@@aprilevangelineeriksson9174 Diana would have known ALL about "Not being human," when it came to her mad behavior behind the camera lenses, and her simpering victim playing--until she and Dodi Al-Fayed became actual victims of their own bad decisions!
Diana entered that marriage as a virginal naive sacrificial lamb for homosexual Charles. She eventually flourished. Meanwhile, ACTRESS and twice divorced Meghan Markle crumbled in less than 1 year. Because being a princess is sooooo "hard". Bawahahahaha
Diana’s Grandmother disliked her and she was the Queen Mother’s close friend, and remember Diana’s mother was called the bolter, and brought shame on her family… crazy by the standards of today. When you say smart are you talking about her clothing, as she wasn’t very bright
She did her best, based on her upbringing. Have you noticed how it was always the ladies who were denigrated in the gossip rags, whether they were elegant or dowdy, political or aloof, visible or reclusive.
@@lizroberts1569 Oh, she was intelligent ! She was quite able to carve her nitch and lead a remarkable life I'm spite of how I'll treated she was by them ! Would you say you were intelligent enough to do what she did ?! I don't think so. You are not even canny because your comment says that much about you !
I don't remember him but watched footage and read a lot about him. He does seem to have been a genuinely nice caring man. There was something very likeable about him. I think he suffered by being king. But I truly believe SHE was a simple power/gold digger.
@@josephwinder6878 She turned down his first two proposals because she didn't want to be in the public eye. And at that point, she had no idea that he would one day be king.
Can one imagine what it was like to have had to live in the same house as ones mother in law, with her mother , it must have been bloody awful for Diana ! .
the Queen Mother didn't live in with her in laws, she and Bertie lived at 145 Piccadilly and Diana didn't live the Queen she and Charles had an apartment in Kensington Palace which she carried on living in after the divorce
Just goes to show that putting people on pedestals just because they're famous, celebrities, royal or wealthy is a ridiculous gullible thing to do. In the end, they're no better than ordinary people.
Ordinary people get put on pedestals too. You are an idiot if you think otherwise. People follow other people. That is how society works. That is literally the only way a society can work.
@@queerlibtardhippie9357 Of course, 'normal people' can be put on pedestals too, I agree 100% but, that doesn't mean it's a good idea. I also think that the notion that it's the only way that society can work isn't entirely accurate. And just as a side note; I would never feel the need to call another commenter an idiot. But hey, you do you.
For a woman who purported to hate Edward VIII for forcing the throne upon her husband (George VI), she sure seemed exceptionally happy with the trappings of being "queen", in addition to being the power behind the throne not only of her husband's reign ask king, but her daughter's (Elizabeth II) reign as queen.
no she wasn't when Elizabeth became Queen and she wasn't with George she helped him in public he did not cope with all the stress and she blamed Edward for that
I think her unbending persona created a lot of heartache. Highly critical. Stuck in old fashion way no longer relevant to their time. She never adapted. “When people shows you who the are, believe them the first time”. Maya Angelou. She was not nice. She says it herself.
"When you look at photographs of her as a young girl, I mean, she looks absolutely ravishing". I'm not sure you should be using that word to describe a young girl...
I saw a pic of her in her 20s and she looks very pretty, I don't think he knew the documentary would show a picture of her as a literal child, they kinda did him dirty 💀💀
I don't think he meant as a child, but as a young girl of around 20. The person doing the editing is the weirdo for picking that particular photo of her as a child.
There was one or two pretty photos of her as a little girl. But that’s all. She was more than average as a young woman and rapidly transformed into a middle-aged matron. The fact that she, as a very old lady, felt jealous of charismatic Young and beautiful Diana speaks volumes about her. Hitler and Diana agreed on one thing about the “sweet” old lady: she is the most dangerous woman they’ had ever seen.
She was the reason why David and Wallis were never allowed to return to Britain for fear they would outshine her shy and reserved husband. Edward missed Fort Belvedere forever but she stood between his return. He never expected this level of rejection. We can see this in the treatment of Prince Harry.
Diana was never beautiful. I preferred the Queen more. She was beautiful because her face showed her strength of the character and unlike Diana, the queen didnt to be filmed all the time and give interviews 24/7 to be as charismatic as she was
@@nekotuan7 The comment I replied to was about the queen mother, not Queen Elizabeth. I made it about queen Elizabeth because I prefer a strong beautiful woman like her above a weak needy cIingey woman like Diana. Elizabeth was better looking and I dont care what you think
@@GodisMyNo1 princess Diana,being a commoner, outshined all the royals alone with ease 🤩 it put these average looking royals in insecurity ( watch the clips about Margaret). You talking about who? That queen mother with below average looks? Bruhj Princess Diana would always look superior standing beside her
I met her at Westminster Abbey as an 18 year old member of the Royal Air Force. She was opening the Chapel of the Royal Air Force within it. I was bursting with excitement inside at meeting our Nation's Gradmother. However she looked at me with such an evil withering glare which I had never encountered before or since. I literally crumpled inside. Absolutely vile woman in my humble opinion.
@@real-eyes-realise-real-lie8888take it, it didn't smile at you then? Think yourself lucky on that one. 😅😅. Heard it was a vile old bag, no time for royalty, and defo no time or respect for that monster.
My mother was born 1926 like Elizabeth, she couldn't stand her, Queen Mary but she did say the following..."Elizabeth took after her dad, Margaret took after the mother, George was a nice man, what he ever seen in her I'll never know kid,.." my mother wasn't even a royalist but she always acknowledged Elizabeth "the minute she had that lump of metal put on her head she felt the weight of history on her shoulders kid, she did her best bless her" I'll go with what my mum said on this, 🙄
She was not a "Lady". She was the child of an unmarried stable hand and was allowed to play with the young son of the count ! She was from really low background - it does not go any lower !
It's not a tittle, it's more sort as a rank. As a legitimazed daughter of a British peer (the earl of Strathmore), she recieved or styled the rank of "lady" by birth. The same way we can see with princess Diana; as she was born as "Lady Diana Frances Spencer" daughter of the earl of Spencer. And later when she married prince Charles she was styled as; "her royal highness Diana the princess of Wales."
I wish that everyone who does not agree with something write it off as propaganda without proof. It is very popular these days to say it is propaganda, fake news or alternative facts just because you don’t agree . Probably without even knowing why you don’t agree or based on the wrong information.
I've met 2 separate people who worked for the Royals in the mid 80's and 90's and both maintained that the Queen Mother had total disdain for most people of all stripes. She apparently was despicable to the staff and quite scathing of the Commoners - complained about their cheap flower bouquets and gifts. They said that she just put on a great act for the world's press.. When l was in Europe l also met people who crewed yachts etc - Princess Margaret was of grim character too, - airs of overt superiority except when she got drunk....and was just an overt out right rude lush.
Yes, good thing they were Royals so they could all find each other ‘drop dead gorgeous’ and ‘absolutely ravishing’ because it’s darn sure nobody else would.
I am "enjoying" the never-before-come-to-light information, if that term can be used, as I'm discovering more and more about the sheer superficiality, cunning and distasteful snobbery running through the veins of the Royals.
@@nannerlchanel5045 : Actually, I don't think I will delve deeper, I think I've had a bellyful already. Royalty is a man-made institution (nothing divine about it!) and the Royals are no better than the rest of us.
My great grandmother, who was the same age as the Queen Mother, could stand her. She always said she was really hated by much of the public in those days - she used to call her "that old tart". She was apparently a notorious gold digger.
The pool of potential suitors for a young aristocratic woman, at that time, would have been restricted by her class (who were, more or less, all related in some way) or from enormous wealth. Not many of those around. So, within that pool, or stagnant pond, he was half decent.
I was gonna say there’s an air about him I kinda see it, after the two first photos… but then I saw the rest, and… well, maybe he was charming? One thing photos can’t tell you much about is a person’s personality, especially in those old timey ones.
It's the elitest poison ivy cabal costal elites or rich big lie. They are delusional and try to convince the masses into believing they are all prettier, more handsome, wiser, more intelligent, more deserving, more entitled, more confident, and more capable because of their wealth or superficial Oxford Cambridge etc educations ..They privately insecurely disdain a meritocracy and honesty and integrity and hard work and actual earned scholarship, because they count on conning the masses to ignore their pompous, evil, yes evil, sleazy ,lazy , smarmy, pretentious, often wreckless, superficial, shallow, money grubbing, power hungry , favors exchanging, cheating and selfish and self serving elitism, by underservedly and dishonestly awarding themselves positions of power, tenure, promotions, awards and money that out of their filthy corruption, they achieve by cheating those who truly merit those things . It has gotten your the point both there and especially the USA, this elitest class will do whatever it takes to win at all costs . When the rare non elitest beats out the undeserving incompetent elitest often smug but clueless ivy morons it is often despite and often in spite of the ivy propaganda machines best efforts to destroy or prevent them from receiving the crefit the elite victory deserves! In short , the elitist wins the prize thinking they hit a home run by being born on third base while the non elite rare Victor had to be exceptional in whatever field to win on merit over this American de facto poison ivy coastal elite monstrous cabal.
Melissa Reiman she sounded like your typical Victorian lady with this “her name shall not be heard” attitude. I’m not surprised since she was born in 1900 during that era.
Diana was really someone who didn't know what she was getting into; I suppose I have some sympathy for her for that but essentially a trivial neurotic young woman, which will make me vr unpopular with Elton John but who cares.
Not to mention Diana was an incredibly stupid women. Don’t give me she loved her children, she threw herself down the stairs when pregnant for attention.
It was interesting and very telling when the narrator said at the end, that the Royals thought (if she'd lived), she would have been a major problem for them. Convenient that she died.
@@ladyshasha4117 she admitted herself that she three herself down the stairs apparantly done it from childhood according to her sisters Dianna wanted her own way. Why should every other royal be criticised but Dianna be treated as an sng when she definitely wasnt
AGREE WITH YOU FOR THE MOST PART. JUST REMEMBER THOUGH, YOU SAID THIS WORLD. CAN'T WAIT UNTIL THE NEXT ONE, ETERNAL LIFE WITH JESUS CHRIST, IF WE ACCEPT AND LIVE FOR HIM IN THIS LIFE.
It's worth noting that the Duke & Dutchess of Windsors relationship although thought of as a love story was actually an abusive relationship, archives & the Dukes own words refer to that fact. Very sad.
True, but dismissing Diana from any blame in her marriage is ignorant. She was a great actress and natural manipulator in her relationships, which isn't a secret.
She and I share a common ancestor. I never was fond of her. I do believe she was an alcoholic who hid it well. She blamed Walls for her husband’s death when it was his unhealthy habits that brought about his demise. Diana was not perfect, neither was she the problem, it was royal duty. Anne is my favorite royal.
Aristocratic commoners are families who were made peers of the Crown because of some great deed performed for the Monarch. These aristocrats, like the Spencers and the Washingtons, were wealthy but not of royal blood. You could be landed gentry and yet be cash-poor.
The Queen Mother was the one who started the Media & Press fascination with Royals. She invited them to make a film of their home life with the princesses. As a result Princess Margaret then became the It girl of her day. Before that, the Royals got at most a paragraph in the papers & no media coverage. She was £5million in debt to Coutts bank when she died due to a heavy horseracing betting habit & her regular, lavish Edwardian style 8 course dinner parties. And when her husband died she annoyed the Queen by insisting on still retaining a huge staff & living beyond her means.
The Queen mother was a snob who looked down on commoners, and I agree, she was rather nasty. Her daughter QE2 is tough herself but actually has a heart for the people.
Plz give examples of her "heart for the people" Do you mean when the coal landslide killed an entire schoolhouse of children by burying them alive and the Queen was asked to go, but refused until made to for appearances? Or the time she denied her sister to marry a divorced man and sent her sister on a life if turmoil? Maybe you mean when the Queen had to be forced to make a public appearance concerning Dianas death?
@@reneesantiago6496 let me guess. THE CROWN on the anti-monarchy NETFLIX channel??? I don't agree with all the Queen's decisions, but she is 95 years old and came from an era where constitutional rules and protocol were HANDED DOWN TO HER by the men in grey suits. I can give many examples of great deeds and approx 3 incidents where she made poor decisions - actually make that 4 if I include Meghan Markle. We all know the French and Spanish hate our monarchy, but the problem is that hatred and judgemental attitudes is the root of all evil on our planet. Have a great day or life, and "God bless our very gracious Queen Elizabeth" 🥰💜🇬🇧 Edit: in case you don't know, The Crown on Netflix is FICTIONAL 🙈
@@reneesantiago6496 The queen has been given a pass for some reason. She has appeared to be a cold, unfeeling woman who had nothing to do w her first two children. She left them both for others to care for…when she took her tours AND when she & Phillip were living a “normal” life of a naval officer in Malta. Charles & Anne we’re not with them during their parent’s years on the Mediterranean. There they lived their “normal” life in a luxurious palace w Lord Mountbatten. The Queen Mother was born of a French cook in her dad’s employment at their English home. Her younger brother had the same mother. Queen Mother lied about her place of birth on many occasions. There’s a plaque in London stating her birth, although she had said she had been born in St Paul. She had little to be snobby about, but she was extremely racist & a huge hypocrite, looking down her nose at those who weren’t royal. She wore the pants in her marriage & her daughters didn’t fall far from the tree.
@@lisagreenhalgh7031 You must read Lady Colin Campbell’s autobiography on the Queen Mother! Quite an eye opener…and Campbell hasn’t been sued for all she has revealed.
I believe that. She treated Prince Philip like crap because she considered him to be minor royalty, not good enough to marry into her family. After her husband died, she refused to leave Buckingham Palace so that her daughter and the Prince could start their lives as the next generation. She was jealous of her daughter coming into her own and sought to diminish her stature because she just did not want to give up the limelight and power that should have been her daughter’s. She meddled in the couple’s affairs in such a way as to put great pressure on her daughter and drive a wedge between them.
Prince Phillip came from a family of kiddie diddlers. Look up Uncle Dickie. If my girl had married into a family like that you better belief I'd stick around too.
My great uncle was the train engineer who drove the train that took King George and Queen Elizabeth across Canada. He talked about her wonderful smile, her kindness to everyone she met, and her great love for her husband.
And He deduced all this from driving a train, was She on the footplate with Him then, seems He must have been helluva close to Her to be able to come to His conclusions.
Her...wonderful smile? You mean the crooked, almost black teeth? One of the most wealthy and powerful people in the world has literally the some of worst teeth I have ever seen. How does your dental hygiene degenerate like that when you are born into wealth and nobility?
... if you've ever watched The Crown- she's not portrayed in a "good light" nor was she "well received".... but dame- she executed her job perfectly in front of the public!
Elizabeth was queen when so many young people were sent to Australia, supposedly for safety during WW2. They were abused in every way. After the war, many of them didn't get to go home, back to England. Probably bc they would have told their poor parents how they were abused. Elizabeth was responsible for that. EVIL B****!
QM's resolve to not leave London prompted my grandmother in Stoke-on-Trent to write to Winston Churchill requesting a Webley side arm "in case the blighters make it to my door I can take one or two with me." He wrote her back praising her pluck but couldn't issue a military weapon to a civilian.
@@jag5470 Although my father was born in Stoke-On-Trent, I am a Canadian and I don't know what a 'stokie' is but from what I've heard of the woman I wouldn't be on the wrong side of her for a gold clock!
Whereabouts in Stoke was she from? I’m from cheadle in staffs on the outskirts and work at the Uni on College road. I love your grandmother… There’s nothing like a feisty poterb to put things right!!👏🏽👏🏽💯💯✨💫
With her plain round homely face, she looked more like the cook to a upper middle class home. To call her “ravishing” is a great exaggeration...........
"She knew that Diana was going to be monsteres embarrassment" 46:47 She was not. But she was planning to uncover what kind of embarrassment the Royal family was.
not as embarrassing as having a man employed to brush your teeth or place your 50 teddy bears in the correct order & cover up s*,x scandals though???? maybe jimmy could fix it for them??
I always saw a false niceness...they all hate anyone less than them...they forget our hard earned money keeps them in a lifestyle we can only dream of....shocking really.
She was a raving social climber and very reluctantly she took Bertie... she considered him the runt of the litter after failing to get David... He made it plain he didn't want her. So overcoming her near revulsion of Bertie she relented and accepted his 20th propasal of marriage...... Only way she thought of getting into the Royal family...... She was even then thought to be a common little Scotch girl.
The Windsor’s wearing paper crowns is “without a doubt the single most shaming moment in the history of the Royal Family in the 20th century”.... this man seriously needs to reevaluate his priorities.
@@dreiss Not sure if she took dogs as "lovers", but certainly a lot of men. Her husband, the King, was a saint that fell in his youth for that imposter. She spoiled the royal lineage with her bad blood. She was the offspring of a female stable hand with an unknown male as a father. Probably a passing-by tramp the stable-hand got involved with. Thus, the maternal grandmother of the present Queen was the most lowly of the low and this line passed into the present members of the royal family. What can you say - "Princess" Marthe of Norway has shacked up with a black "Shamam".She also is the offspring of a prince and his commoner wife. Oh well..... they all should be chased to were the pepper grows and work for their upkeep instead of sucking the taxpayers dry!
A Duke got his head cut off and stuck on London bridge with a paper crown, as a sign of being a pretender to the crown. I cannot BELIEVE Edward did that. What an idiot.
Standards of beauty have changed radically over the last century. Photos don't necessarily reveal attractiveness either. And excessive make-up wasn't really a thing back then. Older people like myself are often nonplussed at about what gets called beauty nowadays. When I was younger older people then had exactly the same reaction to the famed beauties of the time. I think the social perception of what is ideal personal beauty has shifted regularly and rapidly since the mid-century but there was, obviously, change before too. The media influence on our perception of beauty should not be underrated. The influence is huge.
Bertie, when young, was surprisingly handsome for a blood royal. Great cheekbones, as has been observed. Many of the most attractive royals have been married-ins (Philip, Diana, Catherine), Bertie/George VI was an exception.
I think the queen blossomed once her mother passed, as well as her sister. I think the queen mum liked to think herself "the boss" of the firm and all had to kowtow to her wishes ..... including Margaret ... who should have "left home" when she got a divorce and not lived with her mother. Sad really the decisions we make for ourselves ... not always so clever.
U might b surprised to hear Princess Margaret asked to be cremated on her death and placed between her parents. Shows the tightness of their bond, even after death.
QE2 does look more sparkling after her mother died. Like I noticed how frumpy her Mom was and looking at photos it seemed E was going the same way but now, she looks like a cute old lady with these sparkling eyes. Her mother looked like she gave up.
The Queen Mother gave her husband a lot of support he needed it she did not think herself as the boss and of course she found it hard to leave Buckingham Palace it was the last home she had with her husband but she always knew it was her daughter who was The Monarch and didn't act like the boss, in fact she went away to scotland for several months to deal with he grief and Margaret left home when she got married and lived in what is now william's apartment and lived there till she died
i remember, not long after Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother died, that Our beloved Queen blossomed and became the most popular monarch perhaps the world has ever seen. god rest her soul Elizabeth II!
Diana didn't spill the beans, everyone knew. The difference was that it was the 80s/90s and not the early 1900s anymore! The old ways didn't work. Diana wasn't the embarrassment to the public, the royals were.
This is all an act. These ppl are about power and privilege. She is all about the continuity of the Monarchy encouraging the union of her grandson to a teenager 12 years his junior to produce a heir while enabling his relationship with the married woman who is a 🐴 lover. In time that home wrecker may be Queen of UK what a tragedy from Mistress to Queen consort.
@@pdshekkle Diana was NOT a teenager but a woman of 20 Diana's family, especially her father and grandmother encouraged the marriage of Diana to a rich and powerful man.
No, some total dumbasses thought the same way you do. You're completely ignorant, and like most ignorant people, you think you know everything about everyone, even if you've never been within a hundred miles of them.
I've never thought a person in her position had any business being a nice person. She is by definition, a figurehead of the state and must, by law be impartial. She can't be nice to any particular group without offending another. Thus she has no choice but to be perceived as a "cold fish". If she does have personal opinions we will never hear about them, and that is how it should be.
Exactly my thoughts. She was a high society "posh" woman, but she never disrespected her subjects, she taught Elizabeth her kingdom always came first, and the UK owes to her many of the personal sacrifices the royal family has done, for better or for worse
@@sallylunn8324 You cannot be always nice to everybody -- I think we both agree on that -- but thanks for pointing out her position. In a constitutional monarchy, the monarch and his/her family have representative duties, the way they treat their fellow family members, their "subjects" and talk about people and issues falls back on their country. "Queen Mum" made nasty remarks about Mohandas Gandhi (who was a POS in his own way, but that's a different story), the naked man to whom they lost "their" beautiful India. My jaw dropped when she said that, she reminded me of all those old Nazis I got to know as a child, men (and sometimes women) who were so wrapped up in nostalgia that they refused to acknowledge that the Hitler regime was evil.
I sometimes think the kindest thing one could do for the British royal family is to end the monarchy. They have enough private wealth that they're not going to starve if they're taken off the public teat, and the younger members would be far happier if they could live and love without being forced into a narrow-minded stultifying role. It'll be interesting to see how long "the Firm" survives Queen Elizabeth II's death.
Umm so theyre gonna enjoy the riches without carrying out obligations and public duty???Umm pretty sure thats what all the young royals want. And the British public are NOT gonna allow that because they know that the royals live on taxpayers’ mercy and because their own ancestors’ lands were brutally seized centuries before But if the monarchy is to be abolished and they want to be private citizens, but all the assets and lands confiscated, then maybe its possible. Aint gonna happen tho. The monarchy is English people’s identity as much as freedom of speech is for Americans
@@malopephasha5341How will Britain became like the US? The royal family don’t have much influence on daily life at all and without the British royal family the UK has other cultural icons they just monopolise the media so people forget that
@@KingJackson11355 no but it shows she cared little about her expenditure or how she would pay her bills. No she acted with total indifference and lived extremely large whilst never generating a cent. Questionable ethics.
The truth is the man she really loved didn't want to marry her, and by the time she accepted Bertie after an embarrassing number of rejections, other proposals and opportunities had dropped off. She was in danger of becoming an old maid. So at last she gave in......
@@sozbdulrhmanli3300 no she did end up becoming in love with him. At first she didn’t want to marry him and had mixed feelings. However after she married him she learned to love him and was very devastated when he passed. In the end she hated Wallis Simpson and Edward because she felt like being king killed her husband early
@@samadams2575 Not by the standards of that time. If a female hit her mid 20s without being married, she was "on the shelf". Successful debutantes at that time were married by 18 or 19 or were potentially deemed to be failures.
Cathryn Williams yep seems about right you do realize thatbit was the am who ordered diana princess of Wales in the paris tunnel? Diana said it herself the qm really hates me if shes in a room and i come in she walk out of it !! I seriously believe th qm had every reason to have diana killed....when princess diana surpassed the qm in popularity that basically signed her death warrent
Several times I tried to list "Rich Bitch" or "Manipulative Bitch" under her on TvTropes and someone always removes it. They also removed "Upper Class Twit", things that all describe her behavior.
I always thought it was sad, what the queen mum did to David and Wallis, but then what she did to Margaret and Peter Townsend was cruel. She was not happy about her son in law Philip but couldn't spoil that and then never learning, her own grand son. Charles wanted Camilla in his twenties but she had Charles sent away and turned her bitterness on Mountbatten I always thought she was a bitter wounded nasty women. Even the way she quietly bullied (nurtured ????) her own husband was not really healthy This is the first doc I've ever seen that seems to support what I have thought for years. Was it all because she didn't get the love her life.
From what is said about Mountbatten, she was probably right to dislike him pushing his way into their family, most especially a relationship with her young grandson, Charles.
@@valeriebehrendt9380 Lord Mountbatten wasn't trying to push his way in ...he was uncle to Prince Philip, who was a Prince of Greece and Denmark. George V changed the family name to Windsor from SaxeCoburgGothe as the feeling toward Germany was turning in the lead up to WW1. Queen Mary was Princess Mary of Teck....German again! and Phillip's aunt. ElizabethII and Phillip are 2nd cousins so it's not like he was one of the footmen, he was of a similar station, a Prince of 2 countries, which he was made to renounce before he could marry her.
Princess Elizabeth and Princess Margaret were born by Caesarean section - during that time a woman was only medically allowed to have 2 C-sections. That is why there were no further children. Her first C-section was almost certainly done because of physical problems during childbirth, and the second was done as routine after a previous C-section. Please note that there were no reliable and safe anaesthetic agents at that time, so surgery was only done if absolutely indicated.
I’m sorry she lost her brothers to war it’s never right that people die this way but no way rich families like this were “touched as hard as any in the land!”
I think you need to look at the proportion of upper class men killed vs lower class men. Officers were typically upper class, and were specifically targeted by the Germans.
She was born the only girl in a family of boys and was spoiled absolutely rotten by her Parents. That is just for starters. This does not take into account the power she accrued by manipulation.
Wealth can help but is never a comfort for the loss of someone you love. So yes the loss of human life you lose is a hardship. So sad that WW1 was a war that never should be fought.
I've said this long ago. The Queen Mother was a very clever and even cunning woman. And she had this mean streak in her. Her objection resulted in Wallis never getting a HRH - even though she was not a threat to the Royal Family, not even in death in 1986 despite a royal burial at Frogmore. Wallis for all her faults remained true to Edward and donated her estate to the Pasteur Institute.
brianclough ...true to Edward? Complete with documented affairs? Not my idea of faithfulness. My own theory is that David used Wallis as an excuse to escape the despised role of king. I don’t believe for one minute that,with his history of womanizing, this was a great love story. He was a spoiled, self- focused playboy who had no interest in decades and decades of tedious royal duties.Wallis provided a covered escape from that sentence.
Diana was a star from the beginning. As soon as those videos of her were taken when she was dating Charles it was obvious she was very special. Her innocence and kindness shone through. The Queen Mother chose well after all.
Princess Margaret indeed was gorgeous. It’s interesting how elegant and conservative she always dressed, yet, she had this very sensual stare and face.
She was not batty; she had a hearing problem but, had a kind soul and strength in character. Instead of treating her hearing problems, she was put in an asylum. Still, she kept her wits and risked her life to help save some Jews.
I think that she really enjoyed being Queen. When her daughter became Queen I think she didn't want to give up the fame or the glory. I read somewhere that she didn't leave Buckingham Palace easily either. Prince Philip had to put his foot down.
@@KingJackson11355 It was never about how much space Buckingham Palace contained. I think it was because she kept interfering in things. Apparently, initially, the Queens parents weren't that keen on their daughter marrying him, or that's one story. It's difficult to really know the truth as rumours abound all the time about the RF. Anyhow, the story goes that she didn't want to give up the kudos she had as a Queen and the power she wielded in in the Palace. Prince Philip wanted to make changes in the way the Palace was run and the outmoded traditions it continued to follow but the Queen Mother wasn't too keen about these changes.. I think he realised that she had to go or he would never be the head of the household.
While the public at the time knew Buck House had been bombed, it was not disclosed that the King and Queen were nearly killed. The king believed it was a deliberate attempt by a German cousin who was a pilot in the Luftwaffe. Nothing much has changed for the Royal Family since the Wars of the Roses.
They didn't leave like hundreds of brave Londoners who also stayed and after a night of being bombarded from the air they went on to doing jobs like putting out fires and digging bodies out of buildings. Those average people were truly the heros of the day.
@@jackiehammond705 Yes, I can understand reluctance to repair teeth because of pain or the cost. But people with money can eliminate these problems, yet still insist on ignoring the issue. I've never heard an explanation for this weird attitude!
I was never a fan of the Queen Mum. I saw a very spoiled little wealthy child. A spoiled teen, debutant. A girl with numerous potential suitors, but she was holding out for senior royalty. She was ‘thrown’ at the Prince of Wales, later Edward VIII, who showed little interest in her. She was NOT his type. So…….let’s see what happens with Bertie. She knew he liked her….a lot, but she played hard to get, hoping to make Edward jealous. That failed, so she wed Bertie. Her eyebrows and teeth didn’t help her looks at all. In later years she was demanding, acting like she was still Queen Consort, accrued enormous bills, didn’t know the meaning of being less extravagant. I know many Brits adored her, my family included. My grandmother idolized her. She was on the mall to see the Coronation. People in those days only knew what they were permitted to know…..what was revealed. It wasn’t until decades later, books were written giving accounts of what she was like behind palace walls. All I can say is “poor Phillip”, the man was a saint.
You dont even know what philip was like behind closed doors either. No saint would ever say they would like to come back as a deadly virus to solve overpopulation. I cant stand dumb hypocrites
Freedom as an adult to think, act and speak as one pleases, regardless the consequences is a human right. I can see why she would hesitate to marry into a situation where she will be controlled and owned. My own workplace recently decided to give me 3 times in one month hourly lectures of how I should speak, think, and act for my own growth. The reality was they were telling me what color I could say my own skin was, rewrote my national origin to a different island, and erased my identity. That is quite some power that some feel they have a right to over another person and their body! I wish for all people to be free.
Well she certainly put a good face on for the public. But you have to think about her position. Everything has to be perfect and I think she intended it to be
aha,,perfect image, even if tht involves locking up 2 nieces in mental insitutions..... speeding up the previous queens death with drugs and getting rid of embrassasing people , like Diana ...so true ...Narcissists make sure to keep the perfect : IMAGE
I personally never warmed to the Queen mother, her steel like presence was quite noticeable. The fact it was the queen mother that stopped both Princess Margaret and Prince Charles from marrying their true love. No, she was definitely not so nice as her pet her own comment. Too controlling.
Exactly, she and Diana's relatives need to shoulder a lot of the blame for pushing for this marriage, knowing full well that neither party was suited to each other.
@@jackiehamilton2738 Princess Diana was only used to produce a heir and a spare. After she'd done her duty, they no longer needed her. Then it was time to get rid of her, just so Charles could marry his mistress. R.I.P. Diana.❤🙏🙏🙏xx
She was a cute kid, but definitely didn’t age well. Her brown teeth are pretty disgusting...I suppose that came from a lifetime of tea drinking, or just bad hygiene.
Very pretty as a child and young woman. Went early though, didn't it. Same for Margaret, who was an absolute knockout (surprisingly for a royal 😬) whose looks stuck around a little longer.
A planned bombing of an empty wing, orchestrated so the royal family could “could look the east end in the eye” evoking the sentiment that the royals and the “common folk” are the same
I didn’t know her so I can make no comment but she had a beautiful smile and even as an old lady she was pretty, having said that nobody’s all bad she must of had her good points!
Never ever thought she was nice always seemed as if she was lost and didn’t know where she was. Always had a bewildered look on her face.......strange woman
@@prudencel1652apparently George V and Mary were cold and distant, hence the attraction he and Edward had towards steely women who didn’t really share their affections.
Can you imagine if Bertie lived to be as old as his daughter. He would have been king until 1992.
Oh Gosh that makes one think ...
Despite his career in the navy and his outdoor life, George VI was never robust. A stammering neurotic, he drank too much and smoked 60/day
and in the last photos of him in February 1952 when he was 56y old, he looked haggard and 15y older.
The four adult sons of George V were all in their different ways complete messes. Aristocratic upbringing always was, and to an extent still is, brutal
God, i never thought abt it. Just...wow.
@@user-bb8zc3wo9b It would be a completely different world I think.
@@splinterbyrd Poor all of them. It's a far reach to assume they would've lived long b/c first they'd had to have a loving father who didn't call them "stammering fools" and predicting that would "ruin themselves within a year" of being king. George V manhandled them, so they were all nutty--Bertie stammered and chain-smoked, David smoked a lot too, stuttered a little, had tics, was manorexic and, you know the rest. George was a drug addict and bisexual. But if they had and didn't smoke, I think Bertie would've lived to 70s--maybe early 80--Edward ironically lived the longest despite dying of lung cancer from smoking at 77. Their sister had a heart attack at 65 and George died in a crash. I don't think George VI would've lived to be 96, like QE2. Probably 80 at best.
The best anecdote in this video was a brief conversation held by the king with a victim of the blitz, when he told him their home had been bombed as well.
He replied, "Oh really? which one?".
It was the king that said that, not the queen.
@@ryanrose4826
Ok, my bad.
I've edited my comment accordingly.
It's still a good story about an entitled shit though...
@@ryanrose4826 he said it was the kind, unless he edited after Yu said that 🤣
@@ashmarie1881 I think he corrected himself and that’s cool 😎
@@ashmarie1881
Yeah, I edited it to be more accurately attributed towards the king of twats after his fair correction.
Regardless of that however, they all were and still are massively entitled turds who deserve nothing but contempt! 😺
Am I the only one lost when these people are referred to as ravishing, beautiful or as heart throbs??
I'm right there with you ...🤦
She had ravishing teeth ...
My biggest concern is a grown man referring to a 5 to 7 year old girl as ravishing. Big alarm bells, I wouldn't want him anywhere near young girls.
I’m out here with y’all
@@bjjaah lol
She said she wasn’t nice. I believe her.
At the time of her funeral people were interviewed ordinary people in Windsor,everyone spoke highly of her some old ladies used have tea with her I found her s very nice interesting person
l don`t.
buenavistadream ............ In those days people who'd social-climbed-their--way-into-the-Royal-Family didn't want to be reminded of where they'd come from but at least she was honest by saying.....
." I'm not as nice as people think I am!"....
.hmmmmmm just like someone we all know now?
I never, ever thought she was.
@@manuelarita6801 who cares.
She certainly stated the truth when she said "i"m not as nice as people think I am".
I found her extremely kind and very pdtsonslly to me when I suffered a great loss. She didnt publicise her kindness
Wrong. She was such a nice lady. I wish you all would show more respect for her
Hello beautiful lady how are you today hope you’re having a wonderful weekend
how are you??
In God will trust so how are you doing??
"One can live for years sometimes without living at all, and then all life comes crowding into one single hour."
Oscar Wilde.
Yeah, and I bet my hour will come when I'm too doddery to make the most of it.
@@gilgameshofuruk4060 same here. 😏
@@gilgameshofuruk4060 Dont assume its an hour full of great things... sometime it’ll be your ruin, and you’ll be grateful it felled you in your older years instead of in your youth.
Wow I love these posts. Hope this is not my hour 😀
Well that sounds shit. I've lived a thousand lifetimes in this life, and I have a thousand left to go, in this lifetime.
I worked with civil servants who maintained the royal residences. It was known as the Ministry of Works. One used to write the building standards for the whole of the UK. He said he went to Clarence House to assess building works to be completed there.
He said his encounter with the Queen Mother was described as ‘a woman who smiled but held a steely eye stare that was quite frightening’.
I fully appreciated how Diana must have felt.
aw
Diana had described that Queen mother as: "not human"
@@aprilevangelineeriksson9174 Diana would have known ALL about "Not being human," when it came to her mad behavior behind the camera lenses, and her simpering victim playing--until she and Dodi Al-Fayed became actual victims of their own bad decisions!
Diana entered that marriage as a virginal naive sacrificial lamb for homosexual Charles. She eventually flourished. Meanwhile, ACTRESS and twice divorced Meghan Markle crumbled in less than 1 year. Because being a princess is sooooo "hard". Bawahahahaha
Diana had a nickname for the royals :
The reptiles.
Imagine if Simpson and The Queen Mother had twitter.
😅 it would be on fire 😅
Diana , when she grew up , was a very smart woman . I believe that the Queen Mother caused a lot of strife and pain in many people’s lives .
Diana’s Grandmother disliked her and she was the Queen Mother’s close friend, and remember Diana’s mother was called the bolter, and brought shame on her family… crazy by the standards of today. When you say smart are you talking about her clothing, as she wasn’t very bright
She did her best, based on her upbringing. Have you noticed how it was always the ladies who were denigrated in the gossip rags, whether they were elegant or dowdy, political or aloof, visible or reclusive.
She was smart, just naive. You'd be, too, if you'd been that sheltered. She grew out of it, though. She had to.
@@ellenmarch3095 by smart you mean canny as to what was happening ? As intelligent she was not and she always said Harry was like her.
@@lizroberts1569 Oh, she was intelligent ! She was quite able to carve her nitch and lead a remarkable life I'm spite of how I'll treated she was by them !
Would you say you were intelligent enough to do what she did ?! I don't think so. You are not even canny because your comment says that much about you !
I remember my great grandmother telling me how everyone loved King George VI but not many people were keen on the Queen.
I don't remember him but watched footage and read a lot about him. He does seem to have been a genuinely nice caring man. There was something very likeable about him. I think he suffered by being king. But I truly believe SHE was a simple power/gold digger.
No gossiping about a woman no way.
Uncanny how history repeats itself. Lessons should be learned, but sadly it is evident from our current royals, that they are not.
@@josephwinder6878 She was devoted to him. And she was not a gold digger.
@@josephwinder6878 She turned down his first two proposals because she didn't want to be in the public eye. And at that point, she had no idea that he would one day be king.
I find it funny the Queen mother and Wallis going back and forth with insults about each others looks when neither of them were an image of beauty. 😂
Look at the photos of her as a young woman and child she was very pretty then
@@rashidahr4043 she was. I agree with that.
Wallis was beautiful & very striking.
@@adriannespring8598 personal opinions I guess.
Can one imagine what it was like to have had to live in the same house as ones mother in law, with her mother , it must have been bloody awful for Diana ! .
the Queen Mother didn't live in with her in laws, she and Bertie lived at 145 Piccadilly and Diana didn't live the Queen
she and Charles had an apartment in Kensington Palace
which she carried on living in after the divorce
Diana chose that life, nobody forced her
To be fair the house is the size of a hotel
The Queen mum had to live with that old battle axe Queen Mary! What a dour, imposing old lady.
Lol
Some of us still live like that.
Just goes to show that putting people on pedestals just because they're famous, celebrities, royal or wealthy is a ridiculous gullible thing to do. In the end, they're no better than ordinary people.
Ordinary people get put on pedestals too. You are an idiot if you think otherwise. People follow other people. That is how society works. That is literally the only way a society can work.
@@queerlibtardhippie9357 Of course, 'normal people' can be put on pedestals too, I agree 100% but, that doesn't mean it's a good idea. I also think that the notion that it's the only way that society can work isn't entirely accurate. And just as a side note; I would never feel the need to call another commenter an idiot. But hey, you do you.
@@queerlibtardhippie9357 Don't wanna burst your bubble but sheep follow other sheep
Yeah, look at Will Smith! What a joke he is.
They're often a lot worse!
For a woman who purported to hate Edward VIII for forcing the throne upon her husband (George VI), she sure seemed exceptionally happy with the trappings of being "queen", in addition to being the power behind the throne not only of her husband's reign ask king, but her daughter's (Elizabeth II) reign as queen.
Very good point ! Those are my thoughts as well.
Exactly
Hey, one can learn to adjust, you know. 😜
no she wasn't when Elizabeth became Queen and she wasn't with George
she helped him in public
he did not cope with all the stress and she blamed Edward for that
Oh yes she loved it. Never had to worry about where the next gin was coming from 😆
I think her unbending persona created a lot of heartache. Highly critical. Stuck in old fashion way no longer relevant to their time. She never adapted.
“When people shows you who the are, believe them the first time”. Maya Angelou.
She was not nice. She says it herself.
OML! EXACTLY!!!! Finally someone not blinded by false representation and ability to see the actual truth ♥️
"When you look at photographs of her as a young girl, I mean, she looks absolutely ravishing". I'm not sure you should be using that word to describe a young girl...
My thoughts exactly
I saw a pic of her in her 20s and she looks very pretty, I don't think he knew the documentary would show a picture of her as a literal child, they kinda did him dirty 💀💀
She was ordinary looking.
I don't think he meant as a child, but as a young girl of around 20. The person doing the editing is the weirdo for picking that particular photo of her as a child.
@@nepk Lol true
There was one or two pretty photos of her as a little girl. But that’s all. She was more than average as a young woman and rapidly transformed into a middle-aged matron. The fact that she, as a very old lady, felt jealous of charismatic Young and beautiful Diana speaks volumes about her. Hitler and Diana agreed on one thing about the “sweet” old lady: she is the most dangerous woman they’ had ever seen.
She was the reason why David and Wallis were never allowed to return to Britain for fear they would outshine her shy and reserved husband. Edward missed Fort Belvedere forever but she stood between his return. He never expected this level of rejection. We can see this in the treatment of Prince Harry.
Diana was never beautiful. I preferred the Queen more. She was beautiful because her face showed her strength of the character and unlike Diana, the queen didnt to be filmed all the time and give interviews 24/7 to be as charismatic as she was
@@GodisMyNo1 shows how lower your standards are
@@nekotuan7 The comment I replied to was about the queen mother, not Queen Elizabeth.
I made it about queen Elizabeth because I prefer a strong beautiful woman like her above a weak needy cIingey woman like Diana. Elizabeth was better looking and I dont care what you think
@@GodisMyNo1 princess Diana,being a commoner, outshined all the royals alone with ease 🤩 it put these average looking royals in insecurity ( watch the clips about Margaret). You talking about who? That queen mother with below average looks? Bruhj Princess Diana would always look superior standing beside her
I met her at Westminster Abbey as an 18 year old member of the Royal Air Force. She was opening the Chapel of the Royal Air Force within it. I was bursting with excitement inside at meeting our Nation's Gradmother. However she looked at me with such an evil withering glare which I had never encountered before or since. I literally crumpled inside. Absolutely vile woman in my humble opinion.
I am sorry you had to be so disappointed and hurt when you were so young and yet so Brave !
........jealousy ran deep in the R.F & still does............................... IMHO
Do you really think she actually saw you?
@@aalm9179 she was inches away from me and looked me straight in the eyes, and what felt like my soul, so yes.
@@real-eyes-realise-real-lie8888take it, it didn't smile at you then? Think yourself lucky on that one. 😅😅. Heard it was a vile old bag, no time for royalty, and defo no time or respect for that monster.
She always thought she was better than anyone else
eh that's just assumptions
@for project Nope there's books written about her and loads of the public who worked for her say the same thing, she's horrible
My mother was born 1926 like Elizabeth, she couldn't stand her, Queen Mary but she did say the following..."Elizabeth took after her dad, Margaret took after the mother, George was a nice man, what he ever seen in her I'll never know kid,.." my mother wasn't even a royalist but she always acknowledged Elizabeth "the minute she had that lump of metal put on her head she felt the weight of history on her shoulders kid, she did her best bless her" I'll go with what my mum said on this, 🙄
youre right
Having said that, I thought this documentary was absolutely brilliant. I loved all the old film footage
Having said what? 😂
It's a mystery why they say she had a humble background - she was a titled 'Lady' & raised in a castle FFS!
She was not a "Lady". She was the child of an unmarried stable hand and was allowed to play with the young son of the
count ! She was from really low background - it does not go any lower !
She was nothing humble at all, as a daughter of an scotish earl, she belongs to the aristocracy class.
Renata Ostertag do you wash your fruit before eating it?
It's not a tittle, it's more sort as a rank. As a legitimazed daughter of a British peer (the earl of Strathmore), she recieved or styled the rank of "lady" by birth. The same way we can see with princess Diana; as she was born as "Lady Diana Frances Spencer" daughter of the earl of Spencer. And later when she married prince Charles she was styled as; "her royal highness Diana the princess of Wales."
I wish that everyone who does not agree with something write it off as propaganda without proof.
It is very popular these days to say it is propaganda, fake news or alternative facts just because you don’t agree .
Probably without even knowing why you don’t agree or based on the wrong information.
I've met 2 separate people who worked for the Royals in the mid 80's and 90's and both maintained that the Queen Mother had total disdain for most people of all stripes.
She apparently was despicable to the staff and quite scathing of the Commoners - complained about their cheap flower bouquets and gifts.
They said that she just put on a great act for the world's press..
When l was in Europe l also met people who crewed yachts etc - Princess Margaret was of grim character too, - airs of overt superiority except when she got drunk....and was just an overt out right rude lush.
Which she was drunk quite often, so therefore quite nice often.
Why do any of us find this surprising ? They see themselves as superior and oh so mighty .
That's kind of Ill to speak of her in that matter
Wow!!!!
@@adale2771 I agree any person with money has some form of arrogancy.
Yes, good thing they were Royals so they could all find each other ‘drop dead gorgeous’ and ‘absolutely ravishing’ because it’s darn sure nobody else would.
Ain't it the truth!😏
“If you can’t be cute, be rich” - Steve Harvey
@@kaylizzie7890 he’s a prime example of that ! 😂
the DNA pool when they meet each : why hello! its you again. guess we have no choice but find beauty in each other
imo the only pretty royal was Margaret, followed by diana of course, but the rest of them are hardly anything ‘ravishing’ especially this old hag
I love documentaries of the royal family. An indulgence of soap opera with reality TV!
God is with you so how are you doing?????
Too much reality has come to light. God Bless the victims😞💜🙏
I am "enjoying" the never-before-come-to-light information, if that term can be used, as I'm discovering more and more about the sheer superficiality, cunning and distasteful snobbery running through the veins of the Royals.
@@nannerlchanel5045 : Actually, I don't think I will delve deeper, I think I've had a bellyful already. Royalty is a man-made institution (nothing divine about it!) and the Royals are no better than the rest of us.
It was said she had a thing for David but he wouldn't look twice at her so ended up with King George who seemingly proposed three of four times
My great grandmother, who was the same age as the Queen Mother, could stand her. She always said she was really hated by much of the public in those days - she used to call her "that old tart". She was apparently a notorious gold digger.
Why couldn't that gold digger dig some gold to wear less ugly clothes and get herself did?
My grand mother didn’t like her either.
@th827 i dont like her either
She was not a nice person! She held grudges, was spiteful, was unforgiving and helped Charles cheat with Camilla.
"Stewart was an absolute heartthrob!" You've got to be kidding! He's plain as they come, just this side of homely. Standards never cease to amaze!
Heartthrobs change with fashions, compare 1970s, 1990s and 2010s heartthrobs, all wildly different.
There is no accounting for taste.
The pool of potential suitors for a young aristocratic woman, at that time, would have been restricted by her class (who were, more or less, all related in some way) or from enormous wealth. Not many of those around.
So, within that pool, or stagnant pond, he was half decent.
I was gonna say there’s an air about him I kinda see it, after the two first photos… but then I saw the rest, and… well, maybe he was charming? One thing photos can’t tell you much about is a person’s personality, especially in those old timey ones.
It's the elitest poison ivy cabal costal elites or rich big lie. They are delusional and try to convince the masses into believing they are all prettier, more handsome, wiser, more intelligent, more deserving, more entitled, more confident, and more capable because of their wealth or superficial Oxford Cambridge etc educations ..They privately insecurely disdain a meritocracy and honesty and integrity and hard work and actual earned scholarship, because they count on conning the masses to ignore their pompous, evil, yes evil, sleazy ,lazy , smarmy, pretentious, often wreckless, superficial, shallow, money grubbing, power hungry , favors exchanging, cheating and selfish and self serving elitism, by underservedly and dishonestly awarding themselves positions of power, tenure, promotions, awards and money that out of their filthy corruption, they achieve by cheating those who truly merit those things .
It has gotten your the point both there and especially the USA, this elitest class will do whatever it takes to win at all costs . When the rare non elitest beats out the undeserving incompetent elitest often smug but clueless ivy morons it is often despite and often in spite of the ivy propaganda machines best efforts to destroy or prevent them from receiving the crefit the elite victory deserves! In short , the elitist wins the prize thinking they hit a home run by being born on third base while the non elite rare Victor had to be exceptional in whatever field to win on merit over this American de facto poison ivy coastal elite monstrous cabal.
Diana said she was terrified of her. I don’t blame her.
Gabriella I heard the same; she blamed her for many of her troubles. Either way, she’ll always be ‘The People’s Princess’.
After the split, Diana's name wasn't allowed to be mentioned in her presence.
Melissa Reiman she sounded like your typical Victorian lady with this “her name shall not be heard” attitude. I’m not surprised since she was born in 1900 during that era.
@TheLaserQueenTheLaserQueen worshipping at the altar of Goat Lucy!
Diana was really someone who didn't know what she was getting into; I suppose I have some sympathy for her for that but essentially a trivial neurotic young woman, which will make me vr unpopular with Elton John but who cares.
When people tell you what they are ,BELIEVE THEM !
I am a genius, an Oscar winner and have won the Nobel peace prize (twice)
Jealousy is an awful emotion
No one is jealous. Remember Diana said, "They're not human."
(48:25) Truth is hidden in plain sight.
@@serene5345 not human could just mean she sees them as evil
never thought for one moment she was nice.
The queen mother was an amazing lady
My goodness, how they flatter her!
.....and she's dead.
@@dannyv5661 she was alive when this documentary was made
The way they speak of Diana in this is unforgivable!
Why? Diana had numerous affairs even after her divorce. She broke up three relationships. Why shouldn't they speak of her in that way? It's the truth.
Not to mention Diana was an incredibly stupid women. Don’t give me she loved her children, she threw herself down the stairs when pregnant for attention.
diane shelton she didn’t throw her ass down the stairs.. her ass accidentally slipped!
It was interesting and very telling when the narrator said at the end, that the Royals thought (if she'd lived), she would have been a major problem for them. Convenient that she died.
@@ladyshasha4117 she admitted herself that she three herself down the stairs apparantly done it from childhood according to her sisters Dianna wanted her own way. Why should every other royal be criticised but Dianna be treated as an sng when she definitely wasnt
Only tough and cruel people are successful in this world. caring and sweet looking people are crushed by the cruel world.
AGREE WITH YOU FOR THE MOST PART. JUST REMEMBER THOUGH, YOU SAID THIS WORLD. CAN'T WAIT UNTIL THE NEXT ONE, ETERNAL LIFE WITH JESUS CHRIST, IF WE ACCEPT AND LIVE FOR HIM IN THIS LIFE.
@@hallelujah969 fuckoff with that religion shite!
Explain King George and Queen Elizabeth then
It's worth noting that the Duke & Dutchess of Windsors relationship although thought of as a love story was actually an abusive relationship, archives & the Dukes own words refer to that fact. Very sad.
True, but dismissing Diana from any blame in her marriage is ignorant. She was a great actress and natural manipulator in her relationships, which isn't a secret.
I watch all the royal weddings in the pub with my hat on
I watch them wearing a tiny crown, velvet dress eating cake.
In my bed.
Lovely Wahu ditto!
LOLOLOL Me too!!!!!
@Lovely Wahu Neither I do!
Same. Bloody nuisance finding a hat each time but tradition must be observed
Poor Philip, he had to bear her for 81 year
54 years not 81
Philip and ER were Satanists. So save your pity. They both killed 12 kids in Canada and got away with it.
You’ve got the wrong chick.
Phillip was not 'poor' unless it was money. He was a piece ...
You're talking about the wrong Elizabeth. 😉
“They poured ice water on those who came to visit her mother down below”
😂 I’m so immature
It probably warmed up on the way down.
Omg I’m dead 💀😅
She and I share a common ancestor. I never was fond of her. I do believe she was an alcoholic who hid it well. She blamed Walls for her husband’s death when it was his unhealthy habits that brought about his demise. Diana was not perfect, neither was she the problem, it was royal duty. Anne is my favorite royal.
I didn't know there was such a thing an an "aristocratic commoner."
People with great wealth. Where did it come from!
Aristocratic commoners are families who were made peers of the Crown because of some great deed performed for the Monarch. These aristocrats, like the Spencers and the Washingtons, were wealthy but not of royal blood. You could be landed gentry and yet be cash-poor.
Aristocrats May or may not be of royal blood. If you are not royal then you are a commoner.
MELA I never said anything about being pure royal. The question I addressed was how an aristocrat can be a commoner.
She was the daughter of an Earl ..as was Diana .. both of them carried Royal Stuart blood .
The Queen Mother was the one who started the Media & Press fascination with Royals. She invited them to make a film of their home life with the princesses. As a result Princess Margaret then became the It girl of her day. Before that, the Royals got at most a paragraph in the papers & no media coverage. She was £5million in debt to Coutts bank when she died due to a heavy horseracing betting habit & her regular, lavish Edwardian style 8 course dinner parties. And when her husband died she annoyed the Queen by insisting on still retaining a huge staff & living beyond her means.
lovely.. and that bill is paid by the british people?
@@user-zp9br7jk9k The Queen settled her mothers debts.
Being incarnated human made the Royal Mum all that more interesting.
The Queen mother was a snob who looked down on commoners, and I agree, she was rather nasty. Her daughter QE2 is tough herself but actually has a heart for the people.
Plz give examples of her "heart for the people" Do you mean when the coal landslide killed an entire schoolhouse of children by burying them alive and the Queen was asked to go, but refused until made to for appearances? Or the time she denied her sister to marry a divorced man and sent her sister on a life if turmoil? Maybe you mean when the Queen had to be forced to make a public appearance concerning Dianas death?
@@reneesantiago6496 let me guess. THE CROWN on the anti-monarchy NETFLIX channel??? I don't agree with all the Queen's decisions, but she is 95 years old and came from an era where constitutional rules and protocol were HANDED DOWN TO HER by the men in grey suits. I can give many examples of great deeds and approx 3 incidents where she made poor decisions - actually make that 4 if I include Meghan Markle. We all know the French and Spanish hate our monarchy, but the problem is that hatred and judgemental attitudes is the root of all evil on our planet. Have a great day or life, and "God bless our very gracious Queen Elizabeth" 🥰💜🇬🇧
Edit: in case you don't know, The Crown on Netflix is FICTIONAL 🙈
@@reneesantiago6496 The queen has been given a pass for some reason. She has appeared to be a cold, unfeeling woman who had nothing to do w her first two children. She left them both for others to care for…when she took her tours AND when she & Phillip were living a “normal” life of a naval officer in Malta. Charles & Anne we’re not with them during their parent’s years on the Mediterranean. There they lived their “normal” life in a luxurious palace w Lord Mountbatten. The Queen Mother was born of a French cook in her dad’s employment at their English home. Her younger brother had the same mother. Queen Mother lied about her place of birth on many occasions. There’s a plaque in London stating her birth, although she had said she had been born in St Paul. She had little to be snobby about, but she was extremely racist & a huge hypocrite, looking down her nose at those who weren’t royal. She wore the pants in her marriage & her daughters didn’t fall far from the tree.
@@cberry6751 very interesting
@@lisagreenhalgh7031 You must read Lady Colin Campbell’s autobiography on the Queen Mother! Quite an eye opener…and Campbell hasn’t been sued for all she has revealed.
I believe that. She treated Prince Philip like crap because she considered him to be minor royalty, not good enough to marry into her family. After her husband died, she refused to leave Buckingham Palace so that her daughter and the Prince could start their lives as the next generation. She was jealous of her daughter coming into her own and sought to diminish her stature because she just did not want to give up the limelight and power that should have been her daughter’s. She meddled in the couple’s affairs in such a way as to put great pressure on her daughter and drive a wedge between them.
I concur with your opinion, but you forgot to mention that Power is an addicted drug, and clearly she was addicted to it.
Funnily prince Philippe was a royal by blood unlike the QM who became a royal by marriage
Prince Phillip came from a family of kiddie diddlers. Look up Uncle Dickie.
If my girl had married into a family like that you better belief I'd stick around too.
@@sabrina1380m I think, it would do you good to take a look at the Queen Mothers Family tree. SMH
Yeah I was wondering why she walked before queen Elizabeth in prince Charles’ wedding
My great uncle was the train engineer who drove the train that took King George and Queen Elizabeth across Canada. He talked about her wonderful smile, her kindness to everyone she met, and her great love for her husband.
faye belzberg wonderful smile?😳...those stained picket fences she called teeth......uhhh boy.
And He deduced all this from driving a train, was She on the footplate with Him then, seems He must have been helluva close to Her to be able to come to His conclusions.
@@johnmccormick3608 ..
Yet, you know her from a CZcams video?
@@bigjdub13 I made no claims of knowing the old bitch, but the absolute bollocks about a train driver is just plain bullshit.
Her...wonderful smile? You mean the crooked, almost black teeth? One of the most wealthy and powerful people in the world has literally the some of worst teeth I have ever seen. How does your dental hygiene degenerate like that when you are born into wealth and nobility?
I never got the impression that she was all that nice in the first place. The title of this documentary is just stating the obvious.
Even though it is intended to emphasise just how humble and self effacing she was.
MisAnnThorpe humble?? I would never think of her as humble. She was very grand...and spent money like it grew in her garden
A family friends grandad use to work for her and he always said she wasn't that nice!!
@Nenethegreat W why am getting all the heat ...chill out !!!
Wrong. Queen mother was such a nice lady. I wish you all would show more respect for her
I absolutely love and adore this! Thank you. Much Light, Matrhew Moskowitz 🌹
"When you look at photos of her as young girl, she's absolutely ravishing"
OK buddy 👌
Lol Im glad I wasn't the only one who saw that. Wtf?
Haha creeepy. 🤔🤔🤔
Right lmfao I was like chill
My goodness. She makes me look like Marilyn Monroe. "Absolutely ravishing" LOL😉🤪
@@justhere3794 marylin monroe from Friday the 13th
@@SilvieFicova Silvie from “Godzilla “ ?
... if you've ever watched The Crown- she's not portrayed in a "good light" nor was she "well received".... but dame- she executed her job perfectly in front of the public!
I have the complete 1-6 series. Looking forward to season 7.
Elizabeth was queen when so many young people were sent to Australia, supposedly for safety during WW2. They were abused in every way. After the war, many of them didn't get to go home, back to England. Probably bc they would have told their poor parents how they were abused. Elizabeth was responsible for that. EVIL B****!
QM's resolve to not leave London prompted my grandmother in Stoke-on-Trent to write to Winston Churchill requesting a Webley side arm "in case the blighters make it to my door I can take one or two with me." He wrote her back praising her pluck but couldn't issue a military weapon to a civilian.
The blighters." Bwaaaaa!!
😂😍
You have to love a stokie
@@jag5470 Although my father was born in Stoke-On-Trent, I am a Canadian and I don't know what a 'stokie' is but from what I've heard of the woman I wouldn't be on the wrong side of her for a gold clock!
Whereabouts in Stoke was she from? I’m from cheadle in staffs on the outskirts and work at the Uni on College road. I love your grandmother… There’s nothing like a feisty poterb to put things right!!👏🏽👏🏽💯💯✨💫
With her plain round homely face, she looked more like the cook to a upper middle class home. To call her “ravishing” is a great exaggeration...........
"She knew that Diana was going to be monsteres embarrassment" 46:47
She was not. But she was planning to uncover what kind of embarrassment the Royal family was.
not as embarrassing as having a man employed to brush your teeth or place your 50 teddy bears in the correct order & cover up s*,x scandals though???? maybe jimmy could fix it for them??
@@Camille_Anderson I would have burned the damn bears out of pure spite.
Who had the 50 bear dolls??
@@mariahvilla2354 prince Andrew
I never thought she was nice. Quite the opposite, in fact.
I always saw a false niceness...they all hate anyone less than them...they forget our hard earned money keeps them in a lifestyle we can only dream of....shocking really.
Wrong. She was such a nice lady. I wish you all would show more respect for her
My grandmother dies in 2002 age 93. She always said the queen mum was "an old tarter" . My neighbour is 92 and he says the same
She was a raving social climber and very reluctantly she took Bertie... she considered him the runt of the litter after failing to get David... He made it plain he didn't want her. So overcoming her near revulsion of Bertie she relented and accepted his 20th propasal of marriage...... Only way she thought of getting into the Royal family...... She was even then thought to be a common little Scotch girl.
It is said that a snake is not ar all capible of understanding the resentment of the mouse he is in the precess of eating.......
The Windsor’s wearing paper crowns is “without a doubt the single most shaming moment in the history of the Royal Family in the 20th century”.... this man seriously needs to reevaluate his priorities.
@@dreiss Gosh, don't hold back now.
There’s so many embarrassing and shocking examples to pick from, and the narrator chose paper crowns. My god.
@@dreiss Not sure if she took dogs as "lovers", but certainly a lot of men. Her husband, the King, was a saint that fell in his youth for that imposter. She spoiled the royal lineage with her bad blood. She was the offspring of a female stable hand with an unknown male
as a father. Probably a passing-by tramp the stable-hand got involved with.
Thus, the maternal grandmother of the present Queen was the most lowly of the low and this line passed into the present members of
the royal family.
What can you say - "Princess" Marthe of Norway has shacked up with a black "Shamam".She also is the offspring of a prince and
his commoner wife. Oh well..... they all should be chased to were the pepper grows and work for their upkeep instead of sucking
the taxpayers dry!
It was a mockery to the Crown. An American could never understand this.
A Duke got his head cut off and stuck on London bridge with a paper crown, as a sign of being a pretender to the crown. I cannot BELIEVE Edward did that. What an idiot.
I knew someone who worked on the Royal yacht and said he could not stand the queen mother who was a mean drunk.
Standards of beauty have changed radically over the last century. Photos don't necessarily reveal attractiveness either. And excessive make-up wasn't really a thing back then.
Older people like myself are often nonplussed at about what gets called beauty nowadays. When I was younger older people then had exactly the same reaction to the famed beauties of the time.
I think the social perception of what is ideal personal beauty has shifted regularly and rapidly since the mid-century but there was, obviously, change before too.
The media influence on our perception of beauty should not be underrated. The influence is huge.
THIS
Never thought she was attractive, horrible chompers
Bertie was extremely handsome
Horrible chompers lol
Frumpy dumpy.
Bertie did have nice cheekbones
Bertie, when young, was surprisingly handsome for a blood royal. Great cheekbones, as has been observed. Many of the most attractive royals have been married-ins (Philip, Diana, Catherine), Bertie/George VI was an exception.
I think the queen blossomed once her mother passed, as well as her sister. I think the queen mum liked to think herself "the boss" of the firm and all had to kowtow to her wishes ..... including Margaret ... who should have "left home" when she got a divorce and not lived with her mother. Sad really the decisions we make for ourselves ... not always so clever.
U might b surprised to hear Princess Margaret asked to be cremated on her death and placed between her parents. Shows the tightness of their bond, even after death.
QE2 does look more sparkling after her mother died. Like I noticed how frumpy her Mom was and looking at photos it seemed E was going the same way but now, she looks like a cute old lady with these sparkling eyes. Her mother looked like she gave up.
@@jessicavictoriacarrillo7254 She's not Human.
The Queen Mother gave her husband a lot of support he needed it
she did not think herself as the boss and of course she found it hard to leave Buckingham Palace it was the last home she had with her husband
but she always knew it was her daughter who was The Monarch and didn't act like the boss, in fact she went away to scotland for several months to deal
with he grief
and Margaret left home when she got married and lived in what is now william's
apartment and lived there till she died
@@jessicavictoriacarrillo7254 god I’m going to miss the Queen. She was such a cute little old lady.
i remember, not long after Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother died, that Our beloved Queen blossomed and became the most popular monarch perhaps the world has ever seen. god rest her soul Elizabeth II!
She never fooled me.
Diana didn't spill the beans, everyone knew. The difference was that it was the 80s/90s and not the early 1900s anymore! The old ways didn't work. Diana wasn't the embarrassment to the public, the royals were.
This is all an act. These ppl are about power and privilege. She is all about the continuity of the Monarchy encouraging the union of her grandson to a teenager 12 years his junior to produce a heir while enabling his relationship with the married woman who is a 🐴 lover. In time that home wrecker may be Queen of UK what a tragedy from Mistress to Queen consort.
William said that he was embarrassed by his mother.
@@sherryduggar8821 Who wouldn't be embarrassed by a mother like that?
@@pdshekkle Diana was NOT a teenager but a woman of 20 Diana's family, especially her father and grandmother encouraged the marriage of Diana to a rich and powerful man.
Only have to see how she treated her daughters nanny. Hard spiteful individual
Edward and Wallis Simpson used to call her “Cookie” because she was short, fat and looked like a Scottish cook.
It was also a rumor that her real mother was a French cook in the household
"Not as nice as people think"...not everybody thought she was nice.
No, some total dumbasses thought the same way you do. You're completely ignorant, and like most ignorant people, you think you know everything about everyone, even if you've never been within a hundred miles of them.
@@jamesaritchie1 I agree. She was a wonderful lady. People seem to attack her for no reason at all
1917, Michael: "Missing, presumed killed." So ground into the mud and lost. Along with thousands of other men.
He evidently turned up, because he married, had children, and died May 1, 1953. Odd they didn't mention that.
@@bonniemoerdyk9809 Brilliant! You just couldn't make this stuff up .... only they did!
To be frank, I never thought of "Queen Mum" as a nice person. But she was also a person of her time, social background and upbringing.
She was a commoner just like diana and Catherine and Megan just like us all.
I've never thought a person in her position had any business being a nice person. She is by definition, a figurehead of the state and must, by law be impartial. She can't be nice to any particular group without offending another. Thus she has no choice but to be perceived as a "cold fish". If she does have personal opinions we will never hear about them, and that is how it should be.
Exactly my thoughts. She was a high society "posh" woman, but she never disrespected her subjects, she taught Elizabeth her kingdom always came first, and the UK owes to her many of the personal sacrifices the royal family has done, for better or for worse
Tara Wright everyone should be ‘nice’, especially someone in her position. The old ‘Queen Mum’ was a nasty piece of work.
@@sallylunn8324 You cannot be always nice to everybody -- I think we both agree on that -- but thanks for pointing out her position. In a constitutional monarchy, the monarch and his/her family have representative duties, the way they treat their fellow family members, their "subjects" and talk about people and issues falls back on their country. "Queen Mum" made nasty remarks about Mohandas Gandhi (who was a POS in his own way, but that's a different story), the naked man to whom they lost "their" beautiful India. My jaw dropped when she said that, she reminded me of all those old Nazis I got to know as a child, men (and sometimes women) who were so wrapped up in nostalgia that they refused to acknowledge that the Hitler regime was evil.
I sometimes think the kindest thing one could do for the British royal family is to end the monarchy. They have enough private wealth that they're not going to starve if they're taken off the public teat, and the younger members would be far happier if they could live and love without being forced into a narrow-minded stultifying role.
It'll be interesting to see how long "the Firm" survives Queen Elizabeth II's death.
I tend to agree with you although I think they have been such a strong soft power asset that I don't think it'll be let go...
Especially if they send Catherine and William on to many tours. They have young children and it would be very unfair.
Umm so theyre gonna enjoy the riches without carrying out obligations and public duty???Umm pretty sure thats what all the young royals want. And the British public are NOT gonna allow that because they know that the royals live on taxpayers’ mercy and because their own ancestors’ lands were brutally seized centuries before
But if the monarchy is to be abolished and they want to be private citizens, but all the assets and lands confiscated, then maybe its possible. Aint gonna happen tho. The monarchy is English people’s identity as much as freedom of speech is for Americans
Why end monarchy, do u want Britain to be like America
@@malopephasha5341How will Britain became like the US? The royal family don’t have much influence on daily life at all and without the British royal family the UK has other cultural icons they just monopolise the media so people forget that
Well, that is no suprise, this lady , when her daughter became Queen, lived a profligate life. Debts were astounding, her daughter always paid them.
But just because someone was in debt doesn’t mean they were a bad person
She did well.
It's called enabling
@@KingJackson11355 no but it shows she cared little about her expenditure or how she would pay her bills. No she acted with total indifference and lived extremely large whilst never generating a cent. Questionable ethics.
The truth is the man she really loved didn't want to marry her, and by the time she accepted Bertie after an embarrassing number of rejections, other proposals and opportunities had dropped off. She was in danger of becoming an old maid. So at last she gave in......
🤧 before seeing this i thought she was in love with her husband
Uhhh she was only 22 when she married. That’s not anywhere near an old maid. She still have plenty of time...
@@sozbdulrhmanli3300 no she did end up becoming in love with him. At first she didn’t want to marry him and had mixed feelings. However after she married him she learned to love him and was very devastated when he passed. In the end she hated Wallis Simpson and Edward because she felt like being king killed her husband early
I think she looked a lot older than she was.
@@samadams2575 Not by the standards of that time. If a female hit her mid 20s without being married, she was "on the shelf". Successful debutantes at that time were married by 18 or 19 or were potentially deemed to be failures.
Never got a good feeling from this woman
Cathryn Williams yep seems about right you do realize thatbit was the am who ordered diana princess of Wales in the paris tunnel? Diana said it herself the qm really hates me if shes in a room and i come in she walk out of it !! I seriously believe th qm had every reason to have diana killed....when princess diana surpassed the qm in popularity that basically signed her death warrent
@@ernestinemaloy6752 A jealous old women; I have one in my family, just plain horrid!
another discerning person.... Im not surprised, Cathryn
Perhaps there were too many people in attendance at the time?
There was some youtube clip about a protest in the uk, speaking up about abuse and she was mentioned as having fiddled with a little girl.
Queen Elizabeth II only became her true smiling self after the death of her mother. She could relax and be her own Queen.
In the series The Crown she was portrayed as a mean person.
The series is NOT true to the facts.
And a drunk one.
Several times I tried to list "Rich Bitch" or "Manipulative Bitch" under her on TvTropes and someone always removes it. They also removed "Upper Class Twit", things that all describe her behavior.
Series present complete idiotic features.
@@sherryduggar8821 😂😂😂
I always thought it was sad, what the queen mum did to David and Wallis, but then what she did to Margaret and Peter Townsend was cruel. She was not happy about her son in law Philip but couldn't spoil that and then never learning, her own grand son. Charles wanted Camilla in his twenties but she had Charles sent away and turned her bitterness on Mountbatten
I always thought she was a bitter wounded nasty women. Even the way she quietly bullied (nurtured ????) her own husband was not really healthy
This is the first doc I've ever seen that seems to support what I have thought for years.
Was it all because she didn't get the love her life.
Don't pity Margaret...she could have married Townsend..but would have given up her royal standing..title and money...guess what won out?
From what is said about Mountbatten, she was probably right to dislike him pushing his way into their family, most especially a relationship with her young grandson, Charles.
Edward/David was a hitler supporter
@@valeriebehrendt9380 Lord Mountbatten wasn't trying to push his way in ...he was uncle to Prince Philip, who was a Prince of Greece and Denmark. George V changed the family name to Windsor from SaxeCoburgGothe as the feeling toward Germany was turning in the lead up to WW1.
Queen Mary was Princess Mary of Teck....German again! and Phillip's aunt. ElizabethII and Phillip are 2nd cousins so it's not like he was one of the footmen, he was of a similar station, a Prince of 2 countries, which he was made to renounce before he could marry her.
She wasn't happy with anything. A most miserable woman. I believe she had some mental illness
Princess Elizabeth and Princess Margaret were born by Caesarean section - during that time a woman was only medically allowed to have 2 C-sections.
That is why there were no further children.
Her first C-section was almost certainly done because of physical problems during childbirth, and the second was done as routine after a previous C-section.
Please note that there were no reliable and safe anaesthetic agents at that time, so surgery was only done if absolutely indicated.
🤔
Too posh to push, eh
@@marymc4044 Apparently it was a? fashion? Amongst the aristocracy at the time.
Maybe her husband smelled her breath and he wouldn't F her anymore
Praise the Lord. Twos enough. I'm not even sure this family should be allowed to breed.
I’m sorry she lost her brothers to war it’s never right that people die this way but no way rich families like this were “touched as hard as any in the land!”
In fact they were. In fact more so.
I think you need to look at the proportion of upper class men killed vs lower class men. Officers were typically upper class, and were specifically targeted by the Germans.
She was born the only girl in a family of boys and was spoiled absolutely rotten by her Parents. That is just for starters. This does not take into account the power she accrued by manipulation.
Wealth can help but is never a comfort for the loss of someone you love. So yes the loss of human life you lose is a hardship. So sad that WW1 was a war that never should be fought.
No, it’s true. Most families lost their heir & there was a shortage of eligible men for the young girls.
thats 48 minutes of my life im not getting back!
I've said this long ago. The Queen Mother was a very clever and even cunning woman. And she had this mean streak in her. Her objection resulted in Wallis never getting a HRH - even though she was not a threat to the Royal Family, not even in death in 1986 despite a royal burial at Frogmore. Wallis for all her faults remained true to Edward and donated her estate to the Pasteur Institute.
brianclough ...true to Edward? Complete with documented affairs? Not my idea of faithfulness. My own theory is that David used Wallis as an excuse to escape the despised role of king. I don’t believe for one minute that,with his history of womanizing, this was a great love story. He was a spoiled, self- focused playboy who had no interest in decades and decades of tedious royal duties.Wallis provided a covered escape from that sentence.
You are so right. They used each other. She had affairs and laughed in his face. He would sit and cry. Two useless people.
let's not gloss over that they were Nazi sympathizers.
Wallis was not true to Edward. She despised him and would put him down in front of others.
That Nazi sympathizer? I am glad, she never deserved to be called HRH.
Her smile could "melt the coldest of hearts" according to one devoted follower.
She actually HAD the coldest of hearts I would imagine.🙄
In God will trust so how are you doing??
@@robertmorris2421 Fine without a personal god, thank you.🙂
Haha
When she said that she is not nice. Believed her.
Princess Margaret was like her mom as for Queen Elizabeth ii was like her father
Diana was a star from the beginning. As soon as those videos of her were taken when she was dating Charles it was obvious she was very special. Her innocence and kindness shone through. The Queen Mother chose well after all.
Princess Margaret indeed was gorgeous. It’s interesting how elegant and conservative she always dressed, yet, she had this very sensual stare and face.
She was a hardcore alcoholic! Prince Phillip's mother was a saint!
She was a heavy smoker...
Loved her gin!!!
@@finnsmom8470 ..."stale fags & gin on her breath" oooooh luvly! NOT!
She was not batty; she had a hearing problem but, had a kind soul and strength in character. Instead of treating her hearing problems, she was put in an asylum. Still, she kept her wits and risked her life to help save some Jews.
Queen mother liked Ginn or was that Margaret....no liked to party...with friends of the kray twins...👏🤣the original bad gal royal
I think that she really enjoyed being Queen. When her daughter became Queen I think she didn't want to give up the fame or the glory. I read somewhere that she didn't leave Buckingham Palace easily either. Prince Philip had to put his foot down.
Britain's Trump? lol
He put the temperature down on all the thermostats.
But if she was still a queen 👑 to and buckingham palace is huge why couldn’t she stay to??
@@KingJackson11355 It was never about how much space Buckingham Palace contained. I think it was because she kept interfering in things. Apparently, initially, the Queens parents weren't that keen on their daughter marrying him, or that's one story. It's difficult to really know the truth as rumours abound all the time about the RF. Anyhow, the story goes that she didn't want to give up the kudos she had as a Queen and the power she wielded in in the Palace. Prince Philip wanted to make changes in the way the Palace was run and the outmoded traditions it continued to follow but the Queen Mother wasn't too keen about these changes.. I think he realised that she had to go or he would never be the head of the household.
Oh c'mon the woman didn't like anything. She was one miserable bitch
The more documentaries I watch, the more I realize that the Crown is lying when it dismisses itself as fiction.
I didn't know people existed who are as stupid as you sound.
Well them not leaving London even in the face of death, they certainly have the balls. I kind of like that.
They wanted to show-off them bad-assery🤣
@@canalsinceramentenos whatever that is for, dying for clout is still badass lol
It was all PR
While the public at the time knew Buck House had been bombed, it was not disclosed that the King and Queen were nearly killed.
The king believed it was a deliberate attempt by a German cousin who was a pilot in the Luftwaffe. Nothing much has changed for the Royal Family since the Wars of the Roses.
They didn't leave like hundreds of brave Londoners who also stayed and after a night of being bombarded from the air they went on to doing jobs like putting out fires and digging bodies out of buildings. Those average people were truly the heros of the day.
What scared me most about her since I was a child is her teeth.
I know right? I'm sure all they needed was a good professional clean... brrrrr
80 years worth of red wine stains probably.
Yeah, they were atrocious being all the money she had available.
Bad teeth is so British!
@@jackiehammond705 Yes, I can understand reluctance to repair teeth because of pain or the cost. But people with money can eliminate these problems, yet still insist on ignoring the issue.
I've never heard an explanation for this weird attitude!
I was never a fan of the Queen Mum. I saw a very spoiled little wealthy child. A spoiled teen, debutant. A girl with numerous potential suitors, but she was holding out for senior royalty. She was ‘thrown’ at the Prince of Wales, later Edward VIII, who showed little interest in her. She was NOT his type. So…….let’s see what happens with Bertie. She knew he liked her….a lot, but she played hard to get, hoping to make Edward jealous. That failed, so she wed Bertie. Her eyebrows and teeth didn’t help her looks at all.
In later years she was demanding, acting like she was still Queen Consort, accrued enormous bills, didn’t know the meaning of being less extravagant.
I know many Brits adored her, my family included. My grandmother idolized her. She was on the mall to see the Coronation. People in those days only knew what they were permitted to know…..what was revealed. It wasn’t until decades later, books were written giving accounts of what she was like behind palace walls.
All I can say is “poor Phillip”, the man was a saint.
What was she like behind closed doors?
You dont even know what philip was like behind closed doors either. No saint would ever say they would like to come back as a deadly virus to solve overpopulation. I cant stand dumb hypocrites
Personally l have always referred to her as as The Meringue, sickly sweet but also crisp
@@samadams2575 - That means away from the cameras.
He was NOT her type.
Freedom as an adult to think, act and speak as one pleases, regardless the consequences is a human right. I can see why she would hesitate to marry into a situation where she will be controlled and owned.
My own workplace recently decided to give me 3 times in one month hourly lectures of how I should speak, think, and act for my own growth. The reality was they were telling me what color I could say my own skin was, rewrote my national origin to a different island, and erased my identity. That is quite some power that some feel they have a right to over another person and their body!
I wish for all people to be free.
What a cheek! I hope you told them where to go. And I totally agree with you about freedom.
ALL should be free.
Well said!
Yet she had noooo problem issuing instructions to others once she was part of that disgusting family.
Well she certainly put a good face on for the public. But you have to think about her position. Everything has to be perfect and I think she intended it to be
aha,,perfect image, even if tht involves locking up 2 nieces in mental insitutions..... speeding up the previous queens death with drugs and getting rid of embrassasing people , like Diana ...so true ...Narcissists make sure to keep the perfect : IMAGE
I personally never warmed to the Queen mother, her steel like presence was quite noticeable. The fact it was the queen mother that stopped both Princess Margaret and Prince Charles from marrying their true love. No, she was definitely not so nice as her pet her own comment. Too controlling.
Very informative documentary 👍
She wasn’t nice she encourages Charles by allowing him to carry on with camilla at her home
Exactly, she and Diana's relatives need to shoulder a lot of the blame for pushing for this marriage, knowing full well that neither party was suited to each other.
@@jackiehamilton2738 Princess Diana was only used to produce a heir and a spare. After she'd done her duty, they no longer needed her. Then it was time to get rid of her, just so Charles could marry his mistress. R.I.P. Diana.❤🙏🙏🙏xx
Jenny W, hypocrites, all.
@@keepitsimple4629 Diana too was a hipocrite
@@garypatterson2055 If Diana had been more like Sophie instead of disrespecting the RF like she did, they wouldnt have turned on her
Queen mother has always been very plain, she got a handsome king, she looked 50 when she was 30
She was a cute kid, but definitely didn’t age well. Her brown teeth are pretty disgusting...I suppose that came from a lifetime of tea drinking, or just bad hygiene.
Kirsch Rot yasssss Bertie was fine asf!
Well yes, that is the way all stable-hands and their offspring look as soon as they get passed 25 !
So did my grandma..
Very pretty as a child and young woman. Went early though, didn't it. Same for Margaret, who was an absolute knockout (surprisingly for a royal 😬) whose looks stuck around a little longer.
My house too was bombed.
-Oh? Which one?
😂
Vee Flynn
Lol
🤣🤣🤣
Buckingham Palace.
NessieTM exactly!! 🙄 and the ppl would be the ones paying for the repairs to that one ... the audacity
A planned bombing of an empty wing, orchestrated so the royal family could “could look the east end in the eye” evoking the sentiment that the royals and the “common folk” are the same
I didn’t know her so I can make no comment but she had a beautiful smile and even as an old lady she was pretty, having said that nobody’s all bad she must of had her good points!
Never ever thought she was nice always seemed as if she was lost and didn’t know where she was.
Always had a bewildered look on her face.......strange woman
3:30 “Elizabeth had blossomed into an attractive and headstrong young woman” hmmm... I don’t think so
Wallis Simpson looks so masculine in moving pictures as opposed to still pictures.
Still a very unattractive woman
Take a good look at princess Eugenie.
@@canalsinceramentenos why
The questios is of she was in fact a real woman!
Harry's wife is also very masculine, her bone estructure....
Nice? As a Queen Mother you cannot be nice. You must be kind. This is an incredibly strong person. You try wearing that crown. I'd rather not.
Control freak is different from strong. Would you like to live with a controlling freak?
She wasn’t the sweet old woman we remember she was tough. Queen is much nicer a trait she gets from her father.
Agreed, Bertie was too good for her.
@@prudencel1652apparently George V and Mary were cold and distant, hence the attraction he and Edward had towards steely women who didn’t really share their affections.