I'm glad there is someone who is able to go to Russian aviation museums and record video since I, being in the US, am unable to. Love the channel and hope there will be more videos on aircraft featured in the museum.
@@alan6832 Two points: the first is that the Soviet leaders, especially Stalin, were bombastically expanding Soviet influence. Fighting against that is not "treachery", as we could hardly be expected to just allow Soviet influence to take over, and the second is that Stalin's expansionism caused your own country to spend massively on the military. Don't forget, your lot were sucking up to Hitler in the 1930's, and the invasiin of Poland waa a JOINT Soviet and Nazi action. Seriously, that senile git, FDR was far too close to Stalin, a man of known treacherous behaviour.
Yeah, USSR expanded to all Eastern Europe partially some Balkan countries (Jugoslavia), partially to Asian countries (definitely Mongolia, Kyrgyzstan, etc... Korea, and China was not dependent on Soviet state but was communistic), to many African countries supporting communist rezimes, to Cuba, etc... Continue? Maybe Definitely western world was fighting USSR and pushing on it, but Moscow was not better, was just trying to push its side. It's their politics, they chosen it, and blaming western countries is just an old very old joke.
I'm one minute and 20 seconds in and I have to stop and say this looks like a very nice video. It's incredibly valuable to me to see this perspective on jet development from the non-Western designers- of which Russia had in spades. Real talent- for years obscured by Cold War prejudices, but impossible to deny. As a designer myself, the content here is like a college course on jet fighter design philosophy and execution. Beautiful stuff. Thank you!
Fun Fact! A Romanian Yak-23 was acquired by America for evaluation from Yugoslavia (the plane was being shipped through Yugoslavia to Romania). Chuck Yeager was part of the flight team, and the test flights were at Wright Field in Dayton Ohio in Nov 1953. Flight tests showed US intelligence was correct with their assessment on how the plane would preform in flight, the build quality was considered to be poor when compared to western jets. After testing was completed the plane was shipped back to Yugoslavia (quietly of course) so it could complete it's journey to Romania.
That's actually the reason why it was based off of Yak-3. Yakovlev wanted to give the pilots something they were mostly well familiar with. Paired with Yakovlev's planes being extremely easy to fly, it was as good as transitional planes come
When I was younger I made a plastic model of the Yak-23... it was not a good plane but I love it. Thanks for this, and you show me a museum that I want to go to.
History shows an fascinating interplay between advancements in engine technology and advancements in aerodynamics. The advancements in engines generally, (but not always), leads, and then airframe design catches up. In the interim, there are transitional models that point the way to better performing airplanes. The Yak 15 is one such, as were the P-80, the Meteor, Aracomet. The Mig 15, the F-86 and what followed made Mach 2 fighters possible, once the engines could produce sufficient thrust. A kind of engineering pas-de-deux. Very well done vid. Thumbs up.
I'm not completely sure why, but I absolutely love this plane. There's something so special about its long, sloping nose, conventional gear, and tractor jet engine. This to me, is the most inspiring and beautiful of the first generation jet fighters, with the De Havilland comet being a close second. Thank you so much for making such a nice video, on such a wonderful machine
No, I agree, something very cool about this plane. Love the Saab Tunnan as well. And the early MiGs, even with the silly cannon sticking out of the intake splitter. Although there are a ton of fascinating Soviet aircraft, most of them quite obscure in the West, known only to enthusiasts. Yak-25, 27, 28, the
As far as I know there are only two fighter jets to enter service, that were based on piston engine fighters. The Yak-15, and the Swedish SAAB J 21R. I live close to the Swedish Air Force Museum where they have one SAAB J 21R, and also the original propeller version, J 21A, so I've seen that one close up several times. But I've never seen much information on the Yak-15. I very much appreciate this video, and the effort going into making it. Thank you!
Very good episode, your script has a good flow and is very informative. The Yak-15 must be the only jet fighter which still had fabric covering on some surfaces.
This unpronounceable museum looks as good as or better than most aviation museums I've been to in the US - and I've been to a lot! Thanks for another super-high quality video!
I invested many hours getting this plane in the World of Warplanes since I liked that slanted front mounted engine configuration. Light and nimble but underpowered.
Very good video. It can't be emphasized enough that despite the engineers of the day, on all sides, not really knowing what they were doing, they still managed to lay the groundwork for today's amazing fighter planes by trying everything they could think of and not giving up. Yeah, building jet fighters based on prop plane airframes may seem silly or even stupid to some people today but you have to start somewhere. After all, the first prop planes were based on kites...
The Yak-15 sure looks nice. It would be nice for an R/C airplane, glider, or a kite, where the disadvantages of the jet exhaust position wouldn't be an issue.
For the first time in this life, i am not seeing a Karen-monolinguist bullshitting about someone's accent, ethnos or culture. But just gives an adequate remark. That is what is impressive.
@@worldoftancraft I'm not worthy of your praise, i've posted so manny terrible comments,... I wish you clean and clear skies, soft landings, a nice life and please, for the sake of humanity, spread your genes!
It was my privilege to visit this museum a few years ago. The quality and scope of the collection is utterly stunning! Many thanks to the museum leadership and staff for their thoughtful preservation and display of these artifacts.
Wow, you just started a new series you should do sir! I would love to see a series on the evolution of military jets! I love the A12 SR71 video! You were right. I'd love to see you analyze the super saber and F4 Phantom. Of course starting with the first German jet fighter. Please and thank you good sir!
AT 15:53 “it’s funny, while the old guy was the localization on the German, the newcomer became the localization of the British, the RD 500 was made on the basis of the Rolls Royce Derwint 5”. What is even more funny, is the lack of mention that the Soviets were having problems figuring out some of the metallurgical problems. They were being provided UK factory tours of jet development facilities. At one of them they wore shoes with mushy soles in order to collect the metal shavings from the machine tools, thus providing valuable metallurgical information. This claim is made in the book “Gas Turbines for Electric Power Generation, p362, by author S. Can Gullen, Cambridge University Press, 2019” Here is a tinyULED link to the Google Book edition: tinyurl.com/ca4av3ff
Interesting Story: The Russians were having problems with the internal parts of their jets. The metallurgy had some parts melting (due to the low temperature parts). So, the British (who had working Temperature parts) allowed the Russians to tour their aircraft factories. But, the Brits did not allow any device at all (that would record and or collect data). So, the Russians came with soled shoes (very thick and a soft rubber). As the Russians walked through the factory, their Shoes "gathered" the metals. The Russians returned home. They reversed engineered the "gathered" metal and "solved" the metallurgy problem. This is a true story.
The soviets were great practical engineers, you could give them limited resources and they would always find a way to make it work, innovation is a natural ability, not something that requires endless amounts of cash, thanks for uploading.
The Yak 3 is one of my favorite aircraft. Jim has one next door hanger in Georgetown Delaware along with his Mig15. The lines are really clean. It powered by an Allison1710V12
I don’t believe you can undersell the contributions this plane made to Soviet jet fighter development. They learned a lot about what did and did not work and what direction the designs needed go to. It was not just a starting point, but a successful starting point. On a similar note: My father flew the F86.
Right in time for MAKS 2021! As always, I think this video has excellent quality, and hope you’ll release more English content about Soviet and Russian aircraft because information and especially history about these planes in English are mostly biased and far from accurate.
Being so close to Russia and being former military and not only seeing them but literally having them "buzzing your hair" during the cold war, my relationship to Russian/Soviet jets is more of a love/hate-relationsship. It's less fun when they come streaking in so low that the lookouts jump down on deck fearing they will crash into your superstructure.
Bonjour a tous du Canada I read the comment of the other one about the cold war here east of North America we are just sqeeze between U.S.A. & Ussr if yoy pass by North Pole you can imagine all this dog fight in Canadian air space at this era i work on a military base at Montréal and my military commarade explain me in case of major conflict with Russia the Canada must stop the Russian for 36 hrs for give the time to American organized a counter attack he had 3 lines of defence with airport & Radar in norh pole the Dew line lower the mid Canada line more lower Pine three line it's a serious business not a joke cold war era
Very well written script and video. It does a fine job of keeping things in context with the times when jets were a new, unknown frontier. One important aspect of Soviet acquisition of jet technology not mentioned is what they obtained in the U.S. through espionage. By theft of wind tunnel tests, metallurgy experiments, blueprints of aircraft and their engines, Soviet aircraft developers were able to advance much more quickly. Some of these Soviet agents stealing American jet aircraft intelligence during World War II included William Perl, Michael Cham, Joseph & Leona Franey, Loren Haas, Victor Perlo, Aleksandr Petroff, William Pinsly, William Plourde, William Remington, Gregory Silvermaster, Harold Smelzer, Jones Orin York and Amadeo Sabatini.
@@basedhuman6520 the engine the yak-15 uses is a copy of junkers jumo 004B, which doesnt have an afterburner, the if it had afterburner it would have to be a copy of the junkers jumo 004E which was the first jet engine with after burner
@mandellorian cuz the germans invented the modern jet engine, the german engines didnt have afterburner but most features modern combat jets have Also thermo jets need afterburners to gain thrust, its litarly an jet engine powered by a piston engine Yak-15 uses a copy of the jumo 004B which doesnt have afterburner
The Yak-15's looks are underrated. Some people think it looks idiotically old-fashioned but I think it represents a transition from ww2 jet design to that of the 1950s.
This is a very well thought out presentation! The airplane itself represents a quick, pragmatic solution of a problem - how to go from piston engine aircraft to jet aircraft. The Yak-15 is the design that Heinkel should have come up with when they designed the He-162. The Yak is a better idea all the way around.
Not really. This makes sense because they already had an aircraft and just needed to convert it to a fighter. Heinkel needed to design a whole new aircraft anyway, why go through all that trouble to end up with this? The ONLY reason the Soviets adopted this in spite of the enormous drawbacks of the configuration is because it was the only way to fit a jet engine to an existing airframe. There would be zero benefit in putting an engine in this configuration if you were free too adopt any configuration you wanted. In fact, it would be stupid. the only fighter Heikel could have based in on was the He-100, and that was a 1930s design, and the whole point was to develop a fighter that was made of wood and non-strategic materials. They couldn't have just had Messerschmitt convert the Bf 109, since it was already aging, and because they couldn't afford to lose conventional fighter production (same reason the Soviets waited until _after_ the war to do this, even if they had had engines available). Same for the Fw 190. In any case, of all the problems the He 162 had, the placement of the engine was not one of them. Nothing wrong with a dorsal engine, it is a better solution than hanging it under the nose blowtorching the underside of the fuselage and the runway, with conventional landing gear. The problems on the He 162 were all in how difficult it was to fly, and in the construction being weak. None of those would be solved by putting the engine in the nose instead.
The Yak-15 was one of a very few aircraft that was successfully converted from piston to jet propulsion, the other notable aircraft was the Swedish SAAB 21R, a jet derivative of the SAAB 21.
I love the archive footage, this is a fantastic video. Great historical background and research about a plane that has fascinated me all my life. The MiG-15 gets all the kudos for its military success but I remember as a young boy seeing the old grainy photos of the Yak-15 (NATO reporting name Flora) in my already ancient Observer's Book of Aircraft and thinking "that's where it started, the oldest Soviet jet".
I think you are mistaken. The Yak-15 is the _Feather_ . The Yak-23 is the _Flora_ . It has a similar nose-mounted engine layout, but it uses a centrifugal compressor engine taken from British designs, and a tricycle landing gear, and it is a much "fatter" looking jet with a shorter tail and the cockpit mounted further back. It was a contemporary of the MiG-15 _Faggot_ . so the Yak-15 is the oldest Soviet jet, the Yak-23 is the Flora and was probably what you saw in the book. Although knowing Western publications, they may just have gotten the book wrong, and called the Yak-23 the Yak-15.
Omg, the Yak!! Anyone remember the first Red Alert!? Yak then Mig. And was it a Hind for the chopster? Then also later on a transport bird, too? Takes me back to being young!!
Первым реактивным по эфективности стал МиГ - 9...самолет Як - 15 был самолетом для парадов...Что еще можно ожидать было от деревянного планера самолета Як - 3 с приделанным снизу трофейным германским мотором...😮
I love some of the early Russian designs. This little bird just looks so pretty! The fusion between the jet engine from the future and the straight mono-wing design of WW2 fighter air craft makes for one sleek and sexy plane! I'd have loved to have seen her swatting Nazi planes from the sky.
The fact that Britain's short-sighted Labour Government of the mid-1940s allowed the sale of Rolls Royce Derwent & Nene jet engines to the USSR never ceases to amaze me.
Just one of many by post war UK government’s, Labour were particularly bad. They were nieve enough to think they would buy future ones not just copy it then stick it in the Mig15. Stalin was quoted as saying ‘what fool will sell us his secrets’.
I saw one when I visited Varna in Bulgaria a few years back. It was on a stand at the side of the road and I could not stop. I wonder if it is still there?
I doubt it was one of these. From what I have read, there is only one of these left in the world. You probably saw a Yak-23, which is similar but fatter and larger, but which was built and exported in much larger numbers. Or possibly a Yak-17, which was a later development of this, mostly as a trainer (UTI) variant. Or even a MiG-9, although those are not much more common. If it was actually a Yak-15, or even MiG-9, it was a very important discovery, since they are both extremely rare today.
Just watched video of bell x5 that was made after the german prototype Messerschmidt P1101? or so that also featured changing angle of the wings. So the configuration with the engine below is also a copy of known german model and not a new idea. The Messerschmidt Meteor and others like Heinkel had only one jet... It just shows russian improvisation. Love the different american land lease trucks in the videos. Soviets also downplayed this help for their war ;)
the first jet fighters often remind me of something out of an alternate steampunk universe.except for the german twin engine beauty that looks more like a stealth shark!
Excellent story telling, you covered every important point and kept the storyline moving at a good speed. Thank you.
I'm glad there is someone who is able to go to Russian aviation museums and record video since I, being in the US, am unable to. Love the channel and hope there will be more videos on aircraft featured in the museum.
That's why CZcams exists. And we can see museums in the US, Australia, Japan, etc all over the world.
It's a shame how western treachery forced the USSR, which was never rich, to put so much effort into it's military.
@@alan6832 Two points: the first is that the Soviet leaders, especially Stalin, were bombastically expanding Soviet influence. Fighting against that is not "treachery", as we could hardly be expected to just allow Soviet influence to take over, and the second is that Stalin's expansionism caused your own country to spend massively on the military. Don't forget, your lot were sucking up to Hitler in the 1930's, and the invasiin of Poland waa a JOINT Soviet and Nazi action. Seriously, that senile git, FDR was far too close to Stalin, a man of known treacherous behaviour.
Yeah, USSR expanded to all Eastern Europe partially some Balkan countries (Jugoslavia), partially to Asian countries (definitely Mongolia, Kyrgyzstan, etc... Korea, and China was not dependent on Soviet state but was communistic), to many African countries supporting communist rezimes, to Cuba, etc... Continue? Maybe Definitely western world was fighting USSR and pushing on it, but Moscow was not better, was just trying to push its side. It's their politics, they chosen it, and blaming western countries is just an old very old joke.
Yo..what stops you visiting Russia? I've been several times as a UK tourist. Everyone was very hospitable ⭐
I'm one minute and 20 seconds in and I have to stop and say this looks like a very nice video. It's incredibly valuable to me to see this perspective on jet development from the non-Western designers- of which Russia had in spades. Real talent- for years obscured by Cold War prejudices, but impossible to deny. As a designer myself, the content here is like a college course on jet fighter design philosophy and execution. Beautiful stuff. Thank you!
Fun Fact! A Romanian Yak-23 was acquired by America for evaluation from Yugoslavia (the plane was being shipped through Yugoslavia to Romania). Chuck Yeager was part of the flight team, and the test flights were at Wright Field in Dayton Ohio in Nov 1953. Flight tests showed US intelligence was correct with their assessment on how the plane would preform in flight, the build quality was considered to be poor when compared to western jets. After testing was completed the plane was shipped back to Yugoslavia (quietly of course) so it could complete it's journey to Romania.
It would seem that the YAK-15 could be described as the plane that taught the Soviet military how to operate in the jet age.
That's actually the reason why it was based off of Yak-3. Yakovlev wanted to give the pilots something they were mostly well familiar with. Paired with Yakovlev's planes being extremely easy to fly, it was as good as transitional planes come
good analysis mr obvious
@@user-dc9oq2pr6vbe nice
When I was younger I made a plastic model of the Yak-23... it was not a good plane but I love it. Thanks for this, and you show me a museum that I want to go to.
It trained pilots headed for the MiG-15, so it worked out well
History shows an fascinating interplay between advancements in engine technology and advancements in aerodynamics. The advancements in engines generally, (but not always), leads, and then airframe design catches up. In the interim, there are transitional models that point the way to better performing airplanes. The Yak 15 is one such, as were the P-80, the Meteor, Aracomet. The Mig 15, the F-86 and what followed made Mach 2 fighters possible, once the engines could produce sufficient thrust. A kind of engineering pas-de-deux. Very well done vid. Thumbs up.
I'm not completely sure why, but I absolutely love this plane. There's something so special about its long, sloping nose, conventional gear, and tractor jet engine. This to me, is the most inspiring and beautiful of the first generation jet fighters, with the De Havilland comet being a close second. Thank you so much for making such a nice video, on such a wonderful machine
Comet? You mean the Vampire, right?
@@anzaca1 Or he meant "jet aircraft", or forgot what he was typing halfway through.
No, I agree, something very cool about this plane. Love the Saab Tunnan as well. And the early MiGs, even with the silly cannon sticking out of the intake splitter. Although there are a ton of fascinating Soviet aircraft, most of them quite obscure in the West, known only to enthusiasts. Yak-25, 27, 28, the
@@justforever96 having reread it, I think you're both right
@@anzaca1 I think so, although both De Havilland Comets are beautiful in their own rights
Love the way you cover these different planes areas of aviation. Always looking forward to your next video. Thank you so much!
As far as I know there are only two fighter jets to enter service, that were based on piston engine fighters. The Yak-15, and the Swedish SAAB J 21R. I live close to the Swedish Air Force Museum where they have one SAAB J 21R, and also the original propeller version, J 21A, so I've seen that one close up several times. But I've never seen much information on the Yak-15. I very much appreciate this video, and the effort going into making it. Thank you!
I made a model of this aircraft many years ago . It has always has been one of my favourite planes .
Bennnnnnfffffffff
Just Amazing! Nice job on these contents!
It's just wonderful that the internet allows us to share such interesting tails. I hope we can forever be free to do so. Thanks.
Very good episode, your script has a good flow and is very informative.
The Yak-15 must be the only jet fighter which still had fabric covering on some surfaces.
The yak 15 is pretty much a propellor plane with a jet engine
👏👏👏👏👏. A complete presentation of Yak jet fighters please.
This unpronounceable museum looks as good as or better than most aviation museums I've been to in the US - and I've been to a lot! Thanks for another super-high quality video!
To me, at least, the Yak-15 looks beautiful. It looks a lot like a jet air racer.
I invested many hours getting this plane in the World of Warplanes since I liked that slanted front mounted engine configuration. Light and nimble but underpowered.
,,
Found the only person who plays World of Warplanes. Impressive.
@@Nyx_2142 it's a fine looking jet,and Iam sure it was effective for it's time.The Yakovlev company still to date makes good airplane's.
try it in War Thunder you'll know the pain and suffer
@@royalanania3306 mostly navy planes if they do military projects
Very good video.
It can't be emphasized enough that despite the engineers of the day, on all sides, not really knowing what they were doing, they still managed to lay the groundwork for today's amazing fighter planes by trying everything they could think of and not giving up.
Yeah, building jet fighters based on prop plane airframes may seem silly or even stupid to some people today but you have to start somewhere. After all, the first prop planes were based on kites...
Looks like an amazing museum.. Thank you for posting your wonderful video
Love this video. Such an unusual subject for a change.
Skyships Eng, can you do a documentary on Soviet sound barrier testing/breaking?
Great content!
The Yak-15 sure looks nice. It would be nice for an R/C airplane, glider, or a kite, where the disadvantages of the jet exhaust position wouldn't be an issue.
I've watched your 2 year old video about the tu-104 before this one. It's impressive, how much your pronounciation has improoved since then
For the first time in this life, i am not seeing a Karen-monolinguist bullshitting about someone's accent, ethnos or culture. But just gives an adequate remark. That is what is impressive.
@@worldoftancraft I'm not worthy of your praise, i've posted so manny terrible comments,... I wish you clean and clear skies, soft landings, a nice life and please, for the sake of humanity, spread your genes!
It was my privilege to visit this museum a few years ago. The quality and scope of the collection is utterly stunning! Many thanks to the museum leadership and staff for their thoughtful preservation and display of these artifacts.
This was very nice to watch! Great video. Now I'm curious to know more about early soviet military jet planes
2 of 23mm is not a shortcut. A couple of these rounds brought down anything flying.
Excellent!! Great topic,good story-telling,loved it so please do more?
Wow, you just started a new series you should do sir! I would love to see a series on the evolution of military jets! I love the A12 SR71 video! You were right. I'd love to see you analyze the super saber and F4 Phantom. Of course starting with the first German jet fighter. Please and thank you good sir!
AT 15:53 “it’s funny, while the old guy was the localization on the German, the newcomer became the localization of the British, the RD 500 was made on the basis of the Rolls Royce Derwint 5”. What is even more funny, is the lack of mention that the Soviets were having problems figuring out some of the metallurgical problems. They were being provided UK factory tours of jet development facilities. At one of them they wore shoes with mushy soles in order to collect the metal shavings from the machine tools, thus providing valuable metallurgical information. This claim is made in the book “Gas Turbines for Electric Power Generation, p362, by author S. Can Gullen, Cambridge University Press, 2019” Here is a tinyULED link to the Google Book edition: tinyurl.com/ca4av3ff
6:32 Thank you for the comparison! I have never seen a fabric plane up close, and had no idea what it looked/felt like.
Interesting Story:
The Russians were having problems with the internal parts of their jets. The metallurgy had some parts melting (due to the low temperature parts).
So, the British (who had working Temperature parts) allowed the Russians to tour their aircraft factories. But, the Brits did not allow any device at all (that would record and or collect data).
So, the Russians came with soled shoes (very thick and a soft rubber). As the Russians walked through the factory, their Shoes "gathered" the metals.
The Russians returned home.
They reversed engineered the "gathered" metal and "solved" the metallurgy problem.
This is a true story.
Serious Russian ingenuity, impressive!
Very interesting. Impressive work Sir. Looking forward to future videos.
I love the production thought process for this plane yak-3 body and a jet engine
Excellent video. Loved the explanation and narration. 👍👍👍❤️❤️❤️
The soviets were great practical engineers, you could give them limited resources and they would always find a way to make it work, innovation is a natural ability, not something that requires endless amounts of cash, thanks for uploading.
The Yak 3 is one of my favorite aircraft. Jim has one next door hanger in Georgetown Delaware along with his Mig15. The lines are really clean. It powered by an Allison1710V12
I don’t believe you can undersell the contributions this plane made to Soviet jet fighter development. They learned a lot about what did and did not work and what direction the designs needed go to. It was not just a starting point, but a successful starting point. On a similar note: My father flew the F86.
PLEASE continue! Very interesting!
Right in time for MAKS 2021!
As always, I think this video has excellent quality, and hope you’ll release more English content about Soviet and Russian aircraft because information and especially history about these planes in English are mostly biased and far from accurate.
Excellent Video, I always thought the Yak 15/17 and 23 were very elegant looking aircraft.
It's a shame Soviet fighters don't get much attention-this one is historically important but almost unknown.
You gotta admire the ingenuity of those early jet plane engineers, simply amazing!
More of these! The early jet days are an absolutely fascinating subject
I really like your vids, like the way you present things.
I'm in Australia, I love all the cold war Russian old birds ❤
Im from New Mexico USA and love Russian old birds as well.
Being so close to Russia and being former military and not only seeing them but literally having them "buzzing your hair" during the cold war, my relationship to Russian/Soviet jets is more of a love/hate-relationsship.
It's less fun when they come streaking in so low that the lookouts jump down on deck fearing they will crash into your superstructure.
Bonjour a tous du Canada I read the comment of the other one about the cold war
here east of North America we are just sqeeze between U.S.A. & Ussr if yoy pass
by North Pole you can imagine all this dog fight in Canadian air space at this era
i work on a military base at Montréal and my military commarade explain me
in case of major conflict with Russia the Canada must stop the Russian for 36 hrs
for give the time to American organized a counter attack he had 3 lines of defence
with airport & Radar in norh pole the Dew line lower the mid Canada line more lower
Pine three line it's a serious business not a joke cold war era
Very interesting stuff well produced .Rare vidios good history lession.
Yess we need more military aircraft videos!!! I love ur vids!
always liked flying the Yak-15 in the PC sim IL2 but the very low ammo supply made it really difficult to do much damage
Fascinating video! There was a lot of guesswork in all of those early jets; the rules of the new envelopes were just too different...
You always make an excellent presentation.
One of my favourite jets! I didn't know it had successors :O
Great information and films to watch. See and learning Soviet developments. 👍
Very interesting. Enjoy watching your well presented videos.
Very well written script and video.
It does a fine job of keeping things in context with the times when jets were a new, unknown frontier.
One important aspect of Soviet acquisition of jet technology not mentioned is what they obtained in the U.S. through espionage.
By theft of wind tunnel tests, metallurgy experiments, blueprints of aircraft and their engines, Soviet aircraft developers were able to advance much more quickly.
Some of these Soviet agents stealing American jet aircraft intelligence during World War II included William Perl, Michael Cham, Joseph & Leona Franey, Loren Haas, Victor Perlo, Aleksandr Petroff, William Pinsly, William Plourde, William Remington, Gregory Silvermaster, Harold Smelzer, Jones Orin York and Amadeo Sabatini.
Thanks that was very interesting. Really enjoy your channel.
Thanks Sky! Another great video!
An excellent video. Thank you. A special thanks for the also excellent narration.
Very hard documentation work here gives a pretty complete story of this bird. Thumbs up guys !
That steel tailwheel makes perfect sense. Sparks? What sparks?
Doubles as afterburner igniter
@@eugenebebs7767 i dont think it had aftburner back then
@@startingbark0356 It did, they started using afterburners after the MIG-9
@@basedhuman6520 the engine the yak-15 uses is a copy of junkers jumo 004B, which doesnt have an afterburner, the if it had afterburner it would have to be a copy of the junkers jumo 004E which was the first jet engine with after burner
@mandellorian cuz the germans invented the modern jet engine, the german engines didnt have afterburner but most features modern combat jets have
Also thermo jets need afterburners to gain thrust, its litarly an jet engine powered by a piston engine
Yak-15 uses a copy of the jumo 004B which doesnt have afterburner
Interesting information but espionage was rampant when it came to jet aircraft during this era. But very informative, good video
A brilliant video sir. Very informative. Thank you.
Please do a video on NATO designations for Soviet and Russian aircraft: fighters titled F names such as Farmer, Fishbed etc. Great video!!!
what an amazing sight all those red yak 15's must have been.
Great video----Thanks a million!
Good history and a good first jet plane and beginning for Soviet jet fighter planes.
Love early jets, so hard to find good videos on them especially the Soviet ones, thank you
Apparently these little scooters had a phenomenal climb rate!
That looks like a very interesting museum. I bet there were a lot of rude Russian words used manoeuvring the aircraft around those pillars though!
They probably removed the wings. They do that in a lot of aircraft museums
Great Vid on a very unusual Aircraft , how the hell they got those machines in there is a boggler .
Beautiful bird! Thanks for sharing!
Thank you for your excellent presentation of the first Jet Fighters of the then USSR!
The Yak-15's looks are underrated. Some people think it looks idiotically old-fashioned but I think it represents a transition from ww2 jet design to that of the 1950s.
Couple weeks ago I got to BR 5.3 in war thunder in the Soviets...when I heard these flying around the first time in combat my rear end puckered a bit.
This is a very well thought out presentation! The airplane itself represents a quick, pragmatic solution of a problem - how to go from piston engine aircraft to jet aircraft. The Yak-15 is the design that Heinkel should have come up with when they designed the He-162. The Yak is a better idea all the way around.
Not really. This makes sense because they already had an aircraft and just needed to convert it to a fighter. Heinkel needed to design a whole new aircraft anyway, why go through all that trouble to end up with this? The ONLY reason the Soviets adopted this in spite of the enormous drawbacks of the configuration is because it was the only way to fit a jet engine to an existing airframe. There would be zero benefit in putting an engine in this configuration if you were free too adopt any configuration you wanted. In fact, it would be stupid. the only fighter Heikel could have based in on was the He-100, and that was a 1930s design, and the whole point was to develop a fighter that was made of wood and non-strategic materials. They couldn't have just had Messerschmitt convert the Bf 109, since it was already aging, and because they couldn't afford to lose conventional fighter production (same reason the Soviets waited until _after_ the war to do this, even if they had had engines available). Same for the Fw 190. In any case, of all the problems the He 162 had, the placement of the engine was not one of them. Nothing wrong with a dorsal engine, it is a better solution than hanging it under the nose blowtorching the underside of the fuselage and the runway, with conventional landing gear. The problems on the He 162 were all in how difficult it was to fly, and in the construction being weak. None of those would be solved by putting the engine in the nose instead.
I found an excellent channel today, thanks!
The Yak-15 was one of a very few aircraft that was successfully converted from piston to jet propulsion, the other notable aircraft was the Swedish SAAB 21R, a jet derivative of the SAAB 21.
Excellent, authoritative and well presented video history.
Excellent, thank you!
Great to see the Russian side of aviation and super comments with passion.
I love the archive footage, this is a fantastic video. Great historical background and research about a plane that has fascinated me all my life. The MiG-15 gets all the kudos for its military success but I remember as a young boy seeing the old grainy photos of the Yak-15 (NATO reporting name Flora) in my already ancient Observer's Book of Aircraft and thinking "that's where it started, the oldest Soviet jet".
I think you are mistaken. The Yak-15 is the _Feather_ . The Yak-23 is the _Flora_ . It has a similar nose-mounted engine layout, but it uses a centrifugal compressor engine taken from British designs, and a tricycle landing gear, and it is a much "fatter" looking jet with a shorter tail and the cockpit mounted further back. It was a contemporary of the MiG-15 _Faggot_ . so the Yak-15 is the oldest Soviet jet, the Yak-23 is the Flora and was probably what you saw in the book. Although knowing Western publications, they may just have gotten the book wrong, and called the Yak-23 the Yak-15.
This plane was a love at the first sight for me
This is a very excellent video....Thanks very much....!
Great looking museum!
Omg, the Yak!! Anyone remember the first Red Alert!?
Yak then Mig. And was it a Hind for the chopster? Then also later on a transport bird, too?
Takes me back to being young!!
Can you please tell me what sort of aircraft are a Hind & a Chopster? I've never heard of those. Thanks in advance.
@@lesliegardner2692 hind is russian, mil mi 24. Chopster is just me spelling chopper oddly! Yw
@@phineascampbell3103 Thanks.
Первым реактивным по эфективности стал МиГ - 9...самолет Як - 15 был самолетом для парадов...Что еще можно ожидать было от деревянного планера самолета Як - 3 с приделанным снизу трофейным германским мотором...😮
Great history on early jets of the Soviet Union. Thank you.
Great work. TY.
Brilliant video, so my education in Soviets early jets begins.
I love some of the early Russian designs. This little bird just looks so pretty! The fusion between the jet engine from the future and the straight mono-wing design of WW2 fighter air craft makes for one sleek and sexy plane! I'd have loved to have seen her swatting Nazi planes from the sky.
Fantastic video Tovarische! Spaseeba! Vanya in Texas
The yak 15 nice looking aircraft jet fighter the wings of the red star. The jet era had come. The jet age came.
Nice work! Are you going to make a video about the first japanese and british jets?
The first Japanese jets would be interesting.
The fact that Britain's short-sighted Labour Government of the mid-1940s allowed the sale of Rolls Royce Derwent & Nene jet engines to the USSR never ceases to amaze me.
Just one of many by post war UK government’s, Labour were particularly bad. They were nieve enough to think they would buy future ones not just copy it then stick it in the Mig15. Stalin was quoted as saying ‘what fool will sell us his secrets’.
Played the losers like a damn fiddle
Trade with a nation is only a good thing.
@@jakekaywell5972 Yeah sell some F35's to China 🤦
Superb upload ,thank you Sir, i often wonder what WW2 treasures still exist on long abandoned bases in Russia
I saw one when I visited Varna in Bulgaria a few years back. It was on a stand at the side of the road and I could not stop. I wonder if it is still there?
I doubt it was one of these. From what I have read, there is only one of these left in the world. You probably saw a Yak-23, which is similar but fatter and larger, but which was built and exported in much larger numbers. Or possibly a Yak-17, which was a later development of this, mostly as a trainer (UTI) variant. Or even a MiG-9, although those are not much more common. If it was actually a Yak-15, or even MiG-9, it was a very important discovery, since they are both extremely rare today.
Just watched video of bell x5 that was made after the german prototype Messerschmidt P1101? or so that also featured changing angle of the wings. So the configuration with the engine below is also a copy of known german model and not a new idea. The Messerschmidt Meteor and others like Heinkel had only one jet... It just shows russian improvisation. Love the different american land lease trucks in the videos. Soviets also downplayed this help for their war ;)
That is really some weird rudder petal mechanism.A lot of throw and leverage I can see.
The first design aproach of simply putting a jet engine into an existing air frame was logical
the older generation of jet fighters are still cool
the first jet fighters often remind me of something out of an alternate steampunk universe.except for the german twin engine beauty that looks more like a stealth shark!