Verstappen 3D Crash Animation - F1 Azerbaijan Grand Prix 2021
Vložit
- čas přidán 17. 06. 2021
- A 3D animation analysis to show what could have happened if Max Verstappen crashed the other way around on the main straight at the 2021 Formula 1 race at the Baku City Circuit in Azerbaijan. Enjoy the Crashalong!
On Lap 46, Verstappen crashes out of lead after left rear failure. If he had spun his Red Bull to the left, like Lance Stroll 15 laps earlier, he could have hit the barrier on the opposite side. Firstly, I recreated the actual crash in 3D and then mirrored that path. This is just an approximation. In reality, there is a big range where he could have ended up. Still, I was amazed to find out how easily Max could have gone straight towards the pit entry. Do you agree with this analysis? Which other f1 crashes would you like to see?
Disclaimer:
At some moments during the reconstruction, I have to make educated guesses about the dynamics of the car and circuit components. It is not all simulated and I do not claim that the animation is 100% correct. It is based on the experience of a simple mechanical engineer with a fetish for crashes.
_________________________________
Afraid the CZcams algorithm doesn't know what you want to see? Consider subscribing: / @crashalong
Do you want to help me make new videos better and faster? Consider further supporting this channel:
- Comment with feedback and tips on videos and get involved in the discussions
- Share the video on your socials with your motorsport buddies, so they can do the same
- Or buy me a sandwich: www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_...
I not really active on social media, but here you go:
- Reddit: / crashalong_f1
- Twitter: / crashalong_f1
- Instagram: / crashalong_f1
Software: It's Blender 2.93 (blender.org)!
3D Models:
Formula 1 Car models and textures purchased from OpticalDreamSoft. Baku City Circuit track model from RaceDepartment (bit.ly/2SFqDjf), with adaptations to suit 2021 layout.
Song: I Am Unbreakable - Niklas Johansson
#F1, #verstappen, #crashalong, - Krátké a kreslené filmy
I've noticed a lot of questions about the G-forces in the mirrored scenario.
Short answer: roughly 60G. However,
You cannot reliably compare this number to other crashes. Nor is it the actual amount of G's that Verstappen would have experienced. So prepare for this much too long answer for CZcams.
I calculated this for the first impact with the Tecpro safety barrier. The center of gravity decelerated from 241 to 86 km/h in 22 frames at 300 fps, or 73.3 milliseconds. So average deceleration of 587 m/s2, or 60G.
But the measured acceleration depends on the settings and position of the Accident Data Recorder (ADR). Detailed info about that thing here: www.fia.com/sites/default/files/8872-2018_accident_data_recorder_-_eng.pdf
The ADR has a logging frequency of 1000Hz, so measured peak G will be different, likely even higher. BUT, peak G-force is not the full story, it's more about duration (and about direction as well) that determines how dangerous the event is. Interesting article: media.defense.gov/2017/Apr/05/2001727358/-1/-1/0/B_0113_BRULLE_ENGINEERING_SPACE_AGE.PDF (check page 136 for a nice figure :)
Also, this doesn't say how much G's Verstappen actually experienced. He can move around in the cockpit a little bit further and dissipate the force. But a sideways impact would make safety precautions, like the safety belts, etc. less effective for sure.
And finally, this exact trajectory is simply one of many possibilities. I based it on previous accidents and it looks realistic, but putting any effort in calculating or researching this ... 🤔 ... well nevermind.
Only one thing for sure, it wouldn't have been nice.
@@Crashalong What music did u use for this video?
Did you create this yourself?
He would have been so badly injured.
Pirelli would have been fucking executed by the public
@@LeroyW70 I Am Unbreakable - Niklas Johansson
@@Crashalong Cheers mate. Keep making these videos to. I enjoy them too much
The mirrored path is crazy and scary
@Nilofar Khan objects in the mirror are always closer as they appear (or smth like that)
@@JrTr_03 that is completely unrelated to this lmao
@@JrTr_03 lol he meant that the trajectory is mirrored not his actual mirrors LMFAO
@Grand Kids Or got seriously injured and probably out for a race or 2
I am the 1000th like
Oh my god… that is incredibly lucky and really shows how dangerous the tire failures actually were.
Now i know why lewis always complain about the tires
He would've walked away. These cars are too strong
@@weallfollowmanutd and that’s the crazy part, that would have been a 50g+ impact and he probably would have got out and kicked the tyre the exact same way he did in the race
@@weallfollowmanutd Not too strong, just strong, but still, above a certain amount of G forces, you die. F1 drivers can survive a lot, but there is a limit
@@kas-lw7xz drivers can take 150g. Kenny Brack
I think the scariest part about this is the fact that the spin after hitting the first wall means the second wall collision is on the same side, meaning there is no crash structure to protect him.
Not really how it works tho. Double impacts are always better than single impacts due to less energy being dissipated over time. Double impacts are only bad when a separate impact occurs over similar magnitude ie Hubert
@Karl in which hubert crashed into the barrier and then I have a feeling the impact with Correa took him out
@@karl8450 yes but the second impact doesnt make the first one less big. its just added on top.
@@Axel-ki1nr it literally does make the first one less. Car has a set amount of kinetic energy before hitting the wall. If this energy is dissipated over more time then the impact is less. It’s simple physics
@@Axel-ki1nr it’s like imagine you jump from a roof. If you jump all the way from the top to the bottom it will hurt a lot more than if you jump onto a lower roof below or a car etc
FIA about this: "i sleep"
FIA about RB's sub 2 seconds pit stop: **RÆL SHIET?!??/**
yeah, thats the worst rule change in recent history ever,i have to agree,and im not even a rb fan
@@timjourdanmedia wait, did the FIA make a rule so that no one would be able to have 2 second pitstops?
@@luigi695 yep
@@timjourdanmedia can you tell me the details of the rule?
@@luigi695 Rule basically says: "Red Bull too fast in the pits. Red Bull must get slowed down so Mercedes doesn't have to improve by themselves".
No but really: Its basically software only changes to the pit crew equipment.
1) The wheelgun is not allowed to signal its done with the wheel fitting if that is actually not the case.
2) The wheelgun mechanics now have to wait for 0.15s before confirming the finishing of the wheel fitting signaled by the wheelgun. This is supposed to prevent mechanics to just press the button anyways in hopes everything is allright.
3) The lollipop light signal thing now also has delay of (I think) 0.2s before the mechanic can confirm the fitting of all 4 tyres signaled by the mechanics beforehand.
For changes 2 and 3: If the mechanic presses the confirm-button too early, it simply doesnt count and he has to press it again. This basically will create alot of confusion for the pitcrews and tbh, it will just end up with the mechanics spamming the button, which makes the whole system irrelevant... + making everything slower.
It is basically just a rule to slow RBs fast pit stops down, as many rule changes during this season are just that.
It is always fascinating to me how the FIA and F1 are letting Mercedes keep their stuff for the whole season, like the DAS system, but every other team who might have a chance in beating them have to change their stuff because rule changes suddenly come midseason (this year with RB: Rear Wing, Pitstops, etc...; 2019 with Ferrari: Engine).
In my point of view there should be NO rule changes midseason. Its just stupid.
FIA be like: yeah, this is fine, but those pitstops, I tell you man...
Or: this is fine, but Max's celebration is, I tell you man...
@@robn2066 max celebrates like an idiot. He is gonna win the whole thing. But I tell you max :we don't care!
@@marioskapetanakis i dont think hes celebrating for you
@@xobler2508 when I tell we I mean the comu
@@xobler2508 community of f1
Pitlane entry should definitely be rebuilt, even Rosberg had mentioned this in his video before the race. I wonder if FIA gives a damn about actual precautions.
Yeah no pit entry in 300KmH straight, must rebuild the pit entry somewhere. Very dangerous like this
Yeah, Any impact's there are hard, Even in F1 2020 the game, The impact at that speed is so high speed.
Remember why Mercedes left motorsport all together back in the day
Nothing gets done until someone dies. That's how Motorsport conducts itself for some bizarre reason. No matter how many near misses they face
I agree but the only reason the pit entry is built like that is to stop something like this happening and the car entering the pit lane at this speed
Would be really interesting to see Sophia Flörsch's accident in F3 in Macau 2018.
From the view of that press tower especially
I still dont know how the whole top of her car smashed into that board...
with that, how on earth did she flip like that? ur right, a crashalong analysis is necessary
👀
@@Crashalong 👀
👁_👁
fuckin' hell that's scary! share this to MAX!
do it guys
No. Why would you do that? That could really scare him?
@@pro_driver280 awareness to FIA and Pirelli
@@pro_driver280 Max is fully aware of how dangerous that situation is aswell, he's commented on it multiple times.
besides, a racing driver needs to be aware of the dangers.. otherwise they can never extract 100% of their skill.
@@JustaGuy1250 agreed
This isn't even the worst of what could've happened. Had this been what happened he would've been lucky he kinda glanced the edge of the pitwall sideways with only half of his car as that meant there was still momentum and the car kept moving, meaning there was not much deceleration. A little to the right and he would've gone head on into that barrier at full force. The tecpro and car safety would probably have prevented a fatality but he would've felt it no doubt and caused some form of injury...
In my opinion, this is worse because in your scenario the car would hit the barrier at s higher speed but the barrier is very thick there so it should do a good job at stopping the car. In this scenario thr car bounces off the barrier and spins in the opposite direction so more force would be on the driver's body
If he went a little right I would give more trust and credit to the halo, regarding the possible head injury
to be fair he did have a pretty similar crash at Monaco when he went head on at Sandivote and came out with little if any injury
Although I see your theory, I don't think it was the better of the two options. Verstappen gets hit twice on the same side of the car. And the side impact structure is only designed to withstand one impact, not two.
It reminds me of Antoine Hubert. He also had two impacts on the same side. And sadly we know how that ended
@@lucianomorano3394 He was not going in the wall with 240 km/h that time mate.. this would have been way worse
his fate got decided by a coinflip
Indeed. Lance had the same tyre failure but he veered to the left instead. Looks like a 50/50 chance but I've no doubt any driver will try to make sure the car crash to the right side.
would be interesting to see the onboards next to each other, to look at how long each tries to countersteer against the spin
@@MossPalone yh but Lance's was a few hundret metres back
@@pacysteel5979 Both drivers are lucky. One had his tyre failure far away from pit entry and another veered to the right instead of left.
actually his fate was decided by instinct. he turned the wheel to the left which made the car veer left. if he had turned right its very possible this is what would have happened
2:10 The Pirelli add was a nice touch
This channel is so underrated!
Subbed since his first (Grosjean) video, always delivered
Agree. He must rise
Very
Yes, definitely!
Heavy
Someone said it was clearly Valtteri's fault
"I think Magnussen hit us"
Ahahahahaha nice comment
Valterri probably even told the FIA it would be a 2 stop but nobody listened to him
@@najimlatif1383 Nah, I think Ericsson hit us.
No, it was clearly Ericsson.
even the animation is terrifying, let alone had this have actually happened
In the meantime FIA has listened to Toto and did something about the "dangerous" pitstops (read: slowing Redbull down). WTF.
@oof It was Pirelli who asked for less downforce on all cars, so they took off 25% of the floor. Many insiders thought this would hurt high rake cars more but it turned out otherwise. So not a deliberate FIA action to slow down Mercedes.
If he had crashed to the left it would have been more serious so verstapen might have been injured.
we are lucky to not have seen him spin to the left
He would be dead
Well if it was 2017 cars the he would probably be ded because you also see the tires banging on the halo
@@JimNoob true but imagine 200 mph into that wall the g forces would be near if not certainly fatal.
@@JimNoob as he says, the impact would kill you
Some marshalls 100% would’ve been dead!
Max and Stroll : We had rear left puncture.
Ralf Schumacher : First time?
Mansell: "Welcome to the club lads"
I think the FIA said about Nico‘s statement: „No, it‘s no problem, it‘s a FIA-certified circuit“, which is like saying Marihuana is forbidden because it is illegal.
Did you just compare an almost fatal 180 mph crash to smoking a joint ?
@@joewilsonwingflex3752 its called analogy, so people understand the absurdity of it.
@@Crallux Shhhhh let morons be morons
Daniela Ludwig ❤️
@@marchelmberger6249 who is that?
I know this is a guess. But I don't think the cars trajectory would be mirrored. The deflated tyre and angle the car is might make it change its path. Plus driver in put would vary. Again I understand it is a estimate and I love your videos so keep them coming. 🍻
chances and guesses should never be taken in a sport like this, if the possibility is there, the fia should do all they can to minimize the risk it poses.
True but the crash would still most likely end in an injury
@@eightful you are totally right
I think that impact could rip the car like Grosjean's.
So great that he crashed to the right!
I highly doubt. The front half of the car is the absolute strongest point of the car, so a full impact on that half don't have the power to rip it apart.
If the impact hits the back half however, then there's a chance that it would
@@kami_narisama pretty sure the back detaches during a massive impact anyway for safety.
@@rhysfielding8171 exactly. Who even cares where the engine goes? The survival cell is really all that matters
@@rhysfielding8171 No, weight is a big factor in keeping drivers safe. Half the car missing and roughly 53-54% of the weight gone, the car is much more easy to flip around given enough speed and any impacts after the separation of the car becomes much more violent as there isn't as much mass around the driver to cushion him. When Grosjean crashed; the 3 biggest questions that arose (and touched on by the commentators) were why the barriers failed to keep its integrity, how did the fire ensue and why the car was split in half so 'easily'.
A car split in half also creates 2 objects that drivers have to now watch out for in a hypothetical scenario and also exposes sensitive parts of the car like the fuel cell and ZERO protection from behind the driver of the split vehicle. You can also look it up yourself in 30 seconds or be lazy and spread ignorance to look smart momentarily... Come on man, be diligent- there's so much misinformation going around already as it is and people eating it up (2 people bought into your naivety already), don't contribute to the mass ignorance..
@@ballaking1000 true
This is easily either one of the best, or your best upload yet, it looks sooooo realistic
Keep up the great work!
Apparently, the FIA will wait for a Firelli fatality to actually invert Firelli...
I know, That Baku Race was so dangerous, Two tire failures, Someone could've been injured or killed in that, Pirreli really gotta get their shit together, I expect a Lawsuit if it happens again.
p
Ik. they could fotentially hurt someone for real. Someone needs to go to Firelli HQ and foint that out to them
@@freakysquirrel7218 lol
@@freakysquirrel7218 ey firelli u pucked uf
Man, you have crazy attention to detail, even Max taking the hands off of the steering wheel before impact
I honestly still cant believe that race director Masi is downplaying thise whole thing when it was mentioned and predicted prior. Makes me mad, that guy should have said instead yes we should look into it to see if we can improve the pit entrance instead of downplaying of what happend there. Didnt learned anything form the Grosjean crash it seems.
I think the initial impact would have done even more damage to the car than shown in the animation. (Not even speaking about Max himself. That could have been a catastrophe).
Great work!
Indeed, I have been rather gentle with CG Verstappen in this animation.
@@Crashalong Can you be less gentle then please ?
Gee you think?
@@Spyker8921 no you can't do that, it's called being psychopath
@@Crashalong I know you probably have a lot of requests, but Alex Wurz at France and Martin Donnelly crash in which he is ejected could be cool videos
I just thought that, what if a safety marshal
was standing right where the car stopped.
This could have been really bad.
Your giving me Kyalami 1977 flashbacks
@@napoleonbonaparte7172 Oh hell no please!!!
Imagination is important.
I think that Baku pit entry is dangerous.
0:28 Olav!!! The best commentator in the world!!!
True haha
I am still so amazed that you can do this in blender. I tried re creating your kubica one and I just had no idea what to do. Amazing work, surprises me every video! I'm glad I subscribed...
I'm so glad I found this channel. You are a very talented person. Keep it up!
animation and the way you've put this together is amazing !!
OK I need to Sub, these animations are top class and should be picked up by F1.
Hats off to you, unreal work
Yup, that's crazy scary! Amazing animation, well done!
I'm loving the textures on the buildings and cars plus the motion blur is very good.
I don't care how safe the cars are, that is a potential death waiting to happen and Pirelli are entirely to blame for this incident
I think he would have been dead
@@TornadoSTREAMoffiziell without a doubt. If not dead then he would for sure never drive or even walk again
@@firstnamesecondname8280 time has to repeat itself again first. RIP Senna :(
Imagine these guys being the guys that make the damage model on the F1 game that would be sick
This channel is underrated
True
Woah, That's a crazy crash and really good animating! Keep it up!!
Great Job! Every time your animations get better and better!
wow they could have really gone bad for the verstappen
Amazing channel man
You have come a long way sens your first vidio, Great jobb!
Great video, and finally no one can steal your videos!
If he had crashed to the left, that would've been more than 30G's of force, you did a perfect recreation!
You content is really nice
Great video, very interesting and great graphics 👌🏻👍🏻
Man, imma sub right now. Amazing vid
Exceptionnal job !
Great work, but I think that the egine and the other rear part would seperate from the car at the first contact in the mirrored scenario, like Grosjean fireball crash. Anyway, keep doing these simulations, what a great job!
Amazing animation! This is the damage model we need in an F1 game xD Also love the 'what if' concept idea for more videos: reversing direction, maybe changing who in a crash was at fault/who lost control/etc
quality content, very happy it got recommended to me! ❤
Viewing from outside, that must have been internal bleeding
@@Vvopat96 Why nope? The monocoque would leave Max in one piece but internal bleeding occurs when the g-load gets too high.
@@Vvopat96 I understand... I've seen both Indy and Grosjean's crash so I know what you mean. I was just curious why you said 'nope'.
@@Vvopat96 Nope... only curious behind the 'nope' thing. Don't think too much of it because I don't liek personal reason too. Thank you
@@Vvopat96 I believe you and thanks for explaining it to me.
@@Vvopat96 grosjeans was on the exit of a corner so nowhere near as fast as if verstappen hit the barrier at 250 kph
THIS IS THE BEST F1 ANIMATION CHANNEL I HAVE EVER SEEN!
Oh my god this is so incredibly well made!!
Aye bro, love the content, was wondering what that song was. Absolute banger my guy, wish you the best from Tajikistan.
This is frightening, but also so f***ing cool. The music, the voiceovers. Awesome work
Amazing as ever dude
Very nice 3D Animation. Thanx for that. Max is a lucky guy he didn't have to go through that one possible mishappen
Impressive recreaton!!! Even the one that really happend was spot on! I'm not sure if possible, but I would really like to see what the G-force impact would have been, and if... fatal.
Keep doing what you are doing, SkySports could really hire you for these animations
Homestly who thought it would be a giid idea to have the pitwall entry shaped like the head of a spear? Tremendously dangerous
holy crap this is amazing
nice work 👍🏻🙌🏻
amazing 3D stuff thank you for sharing
That's so terrifying. If that happened irl I think I would almost cry
still a better simulation of damage than any Codemasters F1 Game
So good keep up the great work
Wow, incredible.
Nice work.
Surprising how little the FIA has learned about F2 Spa 2019...
they didnt :(
That was something complietly different yes fia need to improve about this but what you say is like saying "man why hasnt fia learned from sennas crash"
@@marlon1463 well they did, they built a chicane, but they can’t help a broken steering column
Nobody wants eau rouge gone
@@yoshuaposhua25 dude you completely missed my point i was not saying they learned nothing out of sennas crash i was saying comparing verstappens crash with huberts is like comparing it to sennas crash because it it something completely different
Nice analysis! I was disappointed to see the sim driver not wearing their seatbelts. :-) Nico has been talking about the dangers of this pitlane entry since the beginning, and it's hard to disagree with him on this.
Subscribed.
Well done
Great work!
It was clear to me from the first time this track was used that the pit entry was an accident waiting to happen. Max was very fortunate he went to the right.
A circuit configuration like that would never be allowed by the FIA on a purpose built track. Are street circuits not bound by the same safety requirements? Is this why most new circuits introduced lately seem to be street circuits?
you should send this to the FIA
Crash would have been incredibly dangerous to marshalls around, not just max
They need to add way more tecpros at the pit entrance as a crash buffer
What did you use to model and render this, looks amazing, nice work!
This just shows how f1 drivers are able to control the car in situations like this. And shows us an example of what could have happened otherwise. You got my sub
1:44. Imagine this being the live view.
And think about the aftermath when they would just show this and then quickly change the camera angle and show the red flags and come back to the accident when they know he is okay (hopefully), a bit like Bahrain 2020 with grosjean. Would've been very scary
I've always thought that pit entry on the straight, where cars are at top speed, is extremely dangerous. I guess the next fatality would be a car hitting the pit entry wall.
Seriously underrated content!
This is amazing, good job.
Great video and choice of music! This reminds me of the pitlane entry at Indianapolis. Over the years a lot drivers crashed into this like Kevin Cogan [1989], Mark Dismore [1991] or Billy Boat [2003]. However, all of these drivers either hit another wall beforehand or were able to brake for a few 100 meters. That could have turned out very badly like Karl Wendlinger in 1994 only at higher speed.
Strange that the FIA and Masi simply ignore this obvious sources of danger. Since Masi has been race director, there have been so many dangerous incidents. It won't go well forever
...
To me this animation proves that the FIA would not make a mistake changing/improving the pit lane entry and exit. This can not be considered a safe pit entry when there's a wall that in certain situations cannot be avoided. Also you'll be hitting that wall with near 300 km/h. As for the pit exit, Paul Ricard should say enough.
This gave me chills.... Glad the crash to the left didn't happen. Great video!
What software are you using this is some heavy stuff your working on keep up the good work
1:39 I could actually imagine the car braking in two similar to grosjean crash as the front part seems to be the main point hit with the rear missing the barrier
it would have but the split part would be towards max's legs, guaranteed broken
What is worse is that because he had a hit on the left hand side of the car twice, the crash structure would be deformed which is why Antoine Hubert’s accident was so catastrophic. Two impacts.
nice work
This was the first comment I made on the videos saying Verstappen was unlucky! Thanks for this!
To be fair (love the animatio btw) there is a few issues with the video I think we can make out (BTW is my suppositions, just to talk about what ifs) :
-Sure if Max would have gone on the left I can clearly say it would have been like this, or even worse, if the car spun a bit more, he would maybe brush the pit wall entry and go rear first into the other barrier, that would have been DESTRUCTIVE driver speaking.
Such impact could give real issue to the driver back not to mention the impact dissipation, that could make the wall even fail and break inwards towards the back of the pits, making the response of the car unknown (possibly even launching it either with the front up or so).
-One issue with the animation is that like we have seen with Grosejan, the car WILL split in two from the safety cell as designed, despite what Toto Wolff said in the Neflix series as "the car shouldn't split in half" (probably meant 'normally shouldn't split'), cars are made that every part except the safety cell IS MADE to be yeeted everywhere as long as it dissipates the energy of the crash to slow down the car and as well to reduce the backfire to the driver.
So let's think the back splits off,that would mean it either proceeded foward and just a bit away from the direction of the cockpit or into the pitlane. While the safety cell could increase the speed of spinning due the lack of the rear, wich could make almost unpredictable how it would smack onto the next wall.
The spin is caused due to the hit of the front of the car with the wall, have it hitted lightly more foward it would stop on the spot, and tbh it would have been MUCH worse, almost as worse as the Perez crash in Monaco.
-Now on a bit more dark scenario, as the car slips on the track to the wall, the impact is so brutal that the protections could do 2 things:
1- Send the car spinning and flying towards the left side( to the pits) and possibly into the safe gap for marshalls, wich could (like explained before whith the car splitting) send the back end either flying in the pitlane or worse, into the inside barriers (with 50/50 to go over) and make a carnage, if we don't get a fire like Grosejan had.
2- (Very unlikely but plausible seeing what happened with a sidepod accident in Spa with F2) The safety cell failure, we could have a Max losing his legs with a complete destruction of the nose where the legs are, not to mention what else could happen after that part, if the things go as the animation.
Remember these cars are HEAVIER than the others, the inertia would be incredible, and so the result of it.
Anyway really good job man, love the animations
Is it possible to calculate the g-force hitting the pit lane barrier from an estimate of the deceleration?
At 1:26, If Verstappen hits the barrier at 240 km/h and slows to maybe 100 km/h than that's a velocity reduction of (240-100)/3.6 = 40 m/s (approx.). In the 6x slo-motion, the velocity change (contact with the barrier) occurs over 10 frames. At 30 fps (or 30 frames per 1/6th second in slo-mo), the time delta (dt) is approx. 1/18th of a second (0.55 s). Therefore it's 40 m/s in 1/18 s (40/(1/18)) which is 720 m/s/s deceleration.
If g is 9.81 m/s/s, than Verstappen's impact is equivalent to ~70g. From a quick google search I found that "Beyond 50 g's, the risk of serious injuries or death is significant". So in this case, Verstappen would no doubt have sustained serious injuries. Please correct me if I have made some poor assumptions in my calculation.
Yeah Hubert died in a 33g crash 70g don't even think about making it
Excellent video
Top quality production this, so professionally done. Hopefully this can be seen by the likes of Max and something can be done 👍
exactly this. And also what if Stolls tire popped a tiny bit earlier in those fast left right corners. That one also could have been alot worse.
"that was a big impact, are you okay?"
If it was sir lancelot engineer he would be like
“Is the car ok? What happened?”
“It’s to say if hards or rocks are better right now. We’re right on the crossover.”
Wow what a video great gob :)
Well done! Just one suggestion, a G meter (especially in this video for example) would add a lot.. thanks for the video!
That really could have killed him, shocking how they care more about sub 2 second pit stops than things like this
Pwoah. If that would happened it would a 100% red flag. But luckily he had hit the right side not the left
It already was a red flag.. more importantly i don’t think Verstappen would have walked away from that very easily
I also don’t think he would have died due to the tecpro barriers. If it was concrete then 100%
Red flag + pit lane closed is a... logistically challenging situation.
So excited for more!!!
The whole imagination of the mirrored path is amazing "I know it was so scary" but way how you did it from scratch is ...... wow