The New Diary of a Wimpy Kid Movie Is DISAPPOINTING...
Vložit
- čas přidán 26. 08. 2024
- The brand new Diary of a Wimpy Kid Movie just released on Disney Plus! Is there any chance of it surpassing the greatness of the live action movies? No.
🙌 / lsmark_
😃 / lsmark
#WimpyKid #DiaryofaWimpyKid #DisneyPlus
The Forgotten Fairly OddParents Crossover - • The Forgotten Fairly O...
Remember Game Grumps AWFUL CZcams Red Show - • Remember Game Grumps A...
Thumbnail - / strawberrymage_
Edited By - / @croey
Outro Music - / ls-mark-outro
What did you think about the new Diary of a Wimpy Kid Movie?
Also yes, THAT video is next.
was mediocre
ooo 😂
I mean I wasn’t expecting much
We already have the masterpiece that is the Trilogy
And I feel like this franchise should have ended 6 years ago
It's okay
Could've been worse
Remember, this series implies Greg is an excellent artist who draws people exactly as they are.
I assume you mean this movie particularly. Because in the live action he’s drawing them different then what they look like.
@@oceansolstice608
They mean that the characters look exactly as they do in the books, so if Greg’s drawings are what the people actually look like, then he is a prodigy portrait artist.
@@oceansolstice608 What other movie would I be referring to?
@@slashbash1347 the live action trilogy….
@@oceansolstice608 got whooshed
i saw it last night cuz when i was a kid i was a MASSIVE fan. i agree a lot with you. movie was way too short (literally like 50 minutes), i also basically forgot it was a diary of a wimpy kid movie because how they never show that greg is making a diary. the animation was ok but definitely could have been better. hope they do a better version with the sequel. and yes, they already announced they’re making a sequel
Fun fact wit the animation in the film: at the start of the science class scene, a girl is missing the top of her head
@@spidermations6495
Look at the top of her heeeeead
*mad cackling*
@lixrel it’s probably going to be a series of short films based on the books
@@guyferrari8124 Gonna do Rodrick Rules again.
JOURNAL
You know what could've been cool? If the movie emulated the Paper Mario style, like having the world be 3d but characters being 2d...or idk something that sets it apart from other CGI animated movies.
That would have worked well
@Blustar_5 yes, also, was it Disney who animated this?
@@elmaionesosexo apparently, disney animation
@@kartikadewi3270 damn, then absolutley
Kind of like Gumball? Would be cool if they added CGI to the background or something
4:30 Actually, in the book, Greg did in fact come up with the idea for Zoo-Wee-Mama and Rowley continued drawing the comic after Greg abandoned it. The 2010 film was never the template they were following for this film, so you may need to read the book again for a proper assessment. However I do agree about how half-assed this movie feels. They cut out so many big parts from the books just to compensate for that 58 minute runtime. If they just gave this movie more time to breathe and include more plot points from the book, it could’ve been one the best and most faithful Wimpy Kid movies in a long time.
It's 58 minutes long!?!
It's literally 58 minutes long? I feel like Disney got REAL cheap with this one.
@JESSE NO Diary of a Wimpy Kids is the non nerdiest book ever.
wait really? i thought that was rowley's idea and greg thought it was nerd like. this is quite interesting
@@greenender2154 Yeah Greg did the first one then abandoned the idea because he didn't think that using the same punchline over and over again would make for a good comic but Rowley loved the idea. In the book he also mentions that he tried to get Rowley to give him credit as at least co-creator
This isn't fully related to the video but your thumbnail game is SO strong, this stuff is a work of art
It’s also very cursed
I wish he used the DOAWK version of his avatar for this video
@@IcyDiamond Me too...
Its also kinda cursed...
@@milktea6676 kinda
Wait, it’s already out? I literally didn’t see any promotion for it apart from the trailer lmao.
Same
You know it's sad when Home Sweet Home Alone gets more advertising than this movie.
I had ads of it on YT but idk abt on TV
@@glossiangelz lmao imagine watching tv
YELLOW ARE YOU TRYING TO BE ANOTHER JUSTIN Y U DAMN FURRY
When it comes to adaptations, Disney has a nasty habit of forcing likeable traits onto characters, even if it's at the expense of the other characters.
That's kinda heartbreaking, Jeff Kinney needs to ignore the rules of what Disney wants.
the art is so uncomfortable, like, theres nothing wrong with the style, but placing characters that cartoony in such a realistic background is sort of uncanny
If Blue Sky Studios was still alive today, I'd imagine they'd do a better job making a Diary of a Wimpy Kid movie than Disney.
They did a pretty good job with The Peanuts Movie so yeah they probably would’ve done a pretty good job
@@crizbit9746 What do you mean?
Damn, now I’m sad now.
@@IcyDiamond why can’t they just read the damn book? Aren’t books cool anymore?
@@crizbit9746 I guess books are just out of style
the fact that LS Mark
doesnt think that this is the worst movie ever is a compliment in of itself
why did you format this like an impact font meme
the fact that LS Mark
bottom text
the fact that LS Mark
is going to review Family Guy makes me excited
the fact that LS Mark
look down below
the fact that
I think the animation is cute and the voice acting is surprisingly good. But the short run time REALLY hurts it. They abridge the first book so much that it kinda loses most of its story threads. This would’ve worked as a series, where each book gets a season. Maybe like 6 episodes each season.
Yes
if they were to make it a show, they'd make it worse than the movie, somehow. i'd really wanna see the classic personalities, instead of just these cookie-cutter background-level doofuses.
They did that for the adaptation for the Last Kids on Earth so it could work
"Maybe if these movies were better then I'd like them more!"
People die when they are killed.
The archer class really is made up of archers.
Characters have emotions
Chocolate is made out of chocolate
I wish the animation was more stylish. Something like The Peanuts Movie would’ve worked pretty perfectly. Like the models are pretty stylised, but the movement’s and textures are so bland.
I didn't mind the final product but the little concept animation they showed in 2019 was what I wish they went for instead, it was more snappy and still retained a 2D feeling despite being 3D
make it black and white, while being panel lined and it would be better
@@flamestoyershadowkill6400 that would be so boring yikes
@@xeno4693 It would look more like the books in a sense
Well, for Peanuts they had more source materials for how the characters would look (fifty years of comics and a whole lot of TV specials and short movies), while for Wimpy Kid they only had the line drawings from the books
They really made him "Wimpy." Greg was wimpy in the original book and movies because he got himself into situations he couldn't get out of, causing karma. In this he's just wimpy because he's unlucky, which isn't in my opinion a good character trait.
Except he does get himself into situations he couldn't get out of in this movie on occasion, and he's also pretty unlucky in the books, even to the point where there was a whole book about it (but that one wasn't that good I'll admit)
He needed to be more of a sociopath. If Greg isn’t gaslighting or manipulating someone, then that’s not greg
Did they try to make him into Charlie Brown in this movie? Sure, Charlie Brown is prone to self sabotage...but they're drastically different characters. Charlie Brown sabotages himself because he views himself so lowly while Greg sabotages himself with his overconfidence. Trying to make Greg into Charlie Brown doesn't work for me.
@@TuesdaysArt I mean, not really. Greg gets himself into trouble because of his mindset, and while Charlie Brown's entire character is his optimism in spite of how he's treated, Greg still treats Rowley pretty badly and suffers the consequences for it (arguably more than in the first movie since he gets punched by a bigger kid in this one and his mom knows about the Big Wheel game which she doesn't in the book).
@@dreddick1235 He still kinda does that. The movie starts with the introduction of the Big Wheel concept which I think is handled a bit more gracefully than the original movie where it kind of comes out of nowhere and you're expected to know why it's happening, and the first thing that happens after Rowley's arm is broken is Greg seeing the cast as a positive and he tries to turn it into a good thing that can benefit them.
I think a lot of people are gonna be upset with the new movies because while the original trilogy changed several things for the better, like Greg being more of an active character, the new ones are likely to be more true to his personality in the book they're adapting, and be closer to the books in general. Greg in the first book is really passive more often than not, and Rowley isn't just a nice kid, he's really innocent and childish, which this one captures really well. Rowley and Greg came up with Zoo-Wee-Mama together in the book so I think that them having him actually steal the idea in this movie wasn't the best decision but it's still technically kind of close (the biggest problem being that Greg should have instigated the conflict at the end like in the book rather than taking the same reasoning from the original movie). Plus, some things that Greg gets into, like wrestling and the play, he's basically forced into and doesn't want to do, while in the movie, he gets into them on his own accord. I think that while I understand being disappointed with the new movie, Mark should have AT LEAST reread the book so he could compare it to the actual source material and not the adaptation of said source material, because several things are done pretty much exactly like the book, such as the ending. Doesn't make sense to me to compare the ending of the new movie to the ending of the first movie when the book ended basically the same way as the new movie does.
And I know that if you need to know the source material to enjoy the adaptation then it's not a good adaptation, but I also think that if you base your major complaints on how they're done in an adaptation rather than the source material for said adaptation, you're bound to come off as a bit biased (like the way the Fregley sleepover ends, the movie adds him going into his father's arms relieved, but the book plays it off as a joke with him waking up his parents at 2 AM). It's especially weird to me because he says the books were a great basis and this new one really is a lot like the book it's based on.
For a while I’ve thought Diary of a Wimpy Kid is like a kid-friendly Always Sunny in Philadelphia, with the main character being a selfish idiot but always paying for it in the end, so I think making Greg more likeable and relatable makes this film a pretty big departure from the spirit of the original.
Anyone else kind of bothered by the contrast between the environmental and character design? Like the sets look pretty good albeit empty, while the character models look like toys.
I'm glad to have more Wimpy Kid movies, but I think this one's style could have been better as a TV series to give more time to flesh out the characters in a way the original movies couldn't and get to more books aside from the first 4-5ish. Not that I've read all of them but there are more Hefley misadventures to be seen, like when Manny nearly kills the family by hoarding their food and turning off the heat in the house
People say Greg is a sociopath but if anything it's manny
It was originally gonna be a TV series
The original plan from the author was to make that one a TV special, but it never got off the ground, so I'm assuming that we are eventually gonna get that in the same format as this one
Hopefully if they’re smart they’ll go with that idea after the second movie
@@joshuabrien2970 but to be fair, most toddlers are
I will admit, I like how the art style kinda looks like The Peanuts Movie and The Captain Underpants movie, because those two movies absolutely slapped!
Yeah but unlike those the animation is crap
@@subifyouhatetiktokandreddit234 true very low budget
@@subifyouhatetiktokandreddit234 I don’t think it’s crap, but it pales in comparison to those other two movies
While the design is pretty decent, the animation movements and quality is more of a standard tv show than a movie... *ESPECIALLY FROM FUCKING DISNEY!*
@@ToonsyTheToon Oh yeah Disney not putting in more budget is ridiculous
In the movie’s defense, disney made it so that they only had one year to make the movie. You can’t make a good movie in only a year without it feeling rushed.
I watched it last night and couldn’t stop thinking that this would’ve worked beautifully as a series where each book is a season and each chapter is an episode. Kinda makes me sad that I don’t work at Disney to make it a reality
The animation looks like it was meant for a TV series, not a full length movie. Tell me this doesn't look like 'Diary of a Wimpy Kid: The Animated Series' to you.
it originally was
Some people think this is a backdoor pilot for a potential doawk series if the movie is successfull
@@Supremekrispykream god i hope so, if the rest of the movie adaptations are anything like this one i dont want it like i loved the movie but its missing WAY to much
I think it should have been stop motion.
I thought it was, wasn't it?
"The same thing but worse" is literally the entire Disney brand now
You know you fucked up when the embodiment of evil calls out your shitty corporate mandated products
@@mattgassenheimer At least I have insanity as an excuse. Disney isn't so fortunate.
wors thing is that they NEVER improve on their mistakes, like any other company would if it made money dont change it, if it fails cancel it
Rowley stealing Greg's idea was in fact in the books, however they emphasize more there that he didn't care about the idea and only changed his mind once Rowley got popular
The live action movie had so many iconic moments-Greg losing to Patty(?) in wrestling, Greg singing "Total Eclipse of the Heart", the original Rodrick...well, the original cast in general. It's hard to top it, though that could be my nostalgia talking.
*The manga:* The original Greg Heffley (Books)
*The anime:* The CGI Greg Heffley
*The Netflix adaptation:* The live-action Greg Heffley (Long Haul)
So what is the original movie trilogy then?
@@IcyDiamondnetflix' s daredevil, a gift to mankind.
@@kamix2.093 So Daredevil is the OG trilogy?
@@IcyDiamond Yes
*The masterpiece fanwork:* The original Trilogy Greg Heffley
I’m not shocked lol. I just want them to leave the franchise alone at this point.
Another unneeded reboot, downright to the name of this movie.
@JACKSEPTICEYE'S DAD DESERVED IT LMFAO maybe some children don't deserve parents
@@ButterScootch No, he constantly makes fun of dead people. He's a sicko and an attention seeker. Best to ignore him.
@JACKSEPTICEYE'S DAD DESERVED IT LMFAO If you’re gonna troll make it less obvious lmao
Are the new books any good I use to read them in middle school
So about the “Rowley stealing the comic strip” from Greg, that actually DID happen in the first book. Just wanted to clarify
They probably should have done a different book in the series as the movie, it would be interesting to see Cabin Fever animated.
Yeah, but we need to wait for the full movie based on The Getaway, Cabin fever, and The Meltdown is because Jeff Kinney is still making an animated sequel version of Rodrick Rules.
This film goes back and forth in a multitude of things, the animation, the voice acting, the story, I really don't know what to think of it.
@JACKSEPTICEYE'S DAD DESERVED IT LMFAO I wish that was how you went out right about now.
4:41 yeah in the books, Greg came up with it and Rowley continue it and I believe that was why the confrontation started in the book since Rowley claim it was all his idea when Greg wanted half credit.
Was looking for this comment.
Yeah that's not even a point Mark could make since this movie is more faithful to the books than the live action one in that regard
and in the live action adaptation, they argue over a game.
@@the_viriathus5719 I mean, not really. They skipped over the play and safety patrol scene, which was the main reason why their friendship broke
@@lunarkinght123 ‘don’t call me, don’t come by my house. We’re done’
In the book Greg did make Zoo Wee Mama but felt that the joke was getting tired so he did his own comic and Rowley continued Zoo Wee Mama, I have no idea why I remember this
The whole thing with Rowely stealing the zoo wee mama joke was in the book
They should have done the entire movie as line drawings.
fr
This may sound confusing, but if that happened would it be Diary Greg we follow or the Greg who writes in the journal? If it was 2d like the books, than it would mean we watch the film through the diary Greg, right?
Right, exactly. The thing that would have made the most sense.
I saw you in Captain Clings comment section
@@enix1323 I imagine the movie would start with Greg (Only showing his hands) opening his Diary and writing about his day. With his drawings coming to life and thus the story goes just like that, with Greg narrating himself with different voices for other characters. Until the end, where Greg shuts his Diary and puts it away. Instead replacing it with a blue book opening the realms for a second movie on Rodrick Rules. - That's just a possibly however, a 2D adaptation has realms of possibilities.
The whole Rowley stealing Zoo-Wee-Mama was a part of the books, but I think it worked better in the book because the movie exists. I like to view the books as how Greg views the world and the movie as how it actually is. Like Greg doesn't want to come off as a jerk so he claims he came up with it, but with the movie, you see it was actually Rowley. But with the reboot being a) a movie and b) animated, it makes it come off as both the movie and the book, so you don't get that brilliant little narrative piece.
That is actually a smart way to look at them
I totally agree with you! The live action movies work so well because you get to see the contrast between reality and Greg's perspective. Making the art style of the diary canon outside of the diary takes away from that...rather than the drawings being Greg's subjective interpretation of reality, he's just drawing a 2D version of the characters we see in the movie.
That's....actually a really brilliant interpretation
his makes so much sense since in the movie he is shown ripping out pages in his book which would explain some of the stuff that didn't fit in with the book
4:29 In the original books, Greg came up with Zoo Wee Mama, so they didn’t change anything, the movies did. That was a little change that really helped the movie though
i agree it helps to charactericize greg even more
remember when everyone said this might be the greatest Diary Of A Wimpy Kid movie? me too....
“Maybe if these movies were better, I’d like them more”
- LS Mark, 2021
4:40 Well from what I remember, they both came up with the idea together, Greg gave up on it, left it to Rowley, and then got jealous when Rowley was getting all the credit as it got popular.
the mom sounded like she was in a completely different universe from the other voice actors, like she was coming through a radio a pillow and across a long distance cup phone
One of my biggest problems with the movie is how much it exaggerated everything. Remember that one drawing in the book where Rowley asks Greg if he wants to play? In the book they just at a locket near maybe one or two guys. In the movie Greg And Rowley are on the stage they have in the cafeteria for some reason and when Rowley says it literally everyone in the cafeteria turns and laughs at them and say “WHAT A LOSER”. Greg shouldn’t really be the victim of the social hierarchy cause the entire point is he’s a loser who obsessed with being popular and made up his own social hierarchy system to try and reason with why he isn’t popular.
When I watched this movie, I definitly enjoyed it quite a bit. I wasn't looking at it with a critical eye, I wasn't looking for flaws I was simply enjoying it. But after listening to your critique, I definitly recogonize more of the problems with this. It definitly seems like a budget constraint and time-crunch was what caused to movie to come out like this. I'm hoping that the Rodrick Rules movie doesn't try to cram as much stuff from the book and movie as they can into it. I don't think this was a bad movie as all I thought it was fine even after your review, but I do wish that Rodrick Rules continues from both the amazing book and the movie. And if there is going to be such a big time-crunch and budget constraints, they shouldn't try to do more than they can with that. I can definitly see something great here and I feel like they can definitly get themselves back on their feet with Rodrick Rules, theres no reason not to.
I think what also helps is that it feels more slice of life and closer to the book. I feel like a lot of people are going to compare this movie to the original (like Mark does) when a lot of the basis for the new one is tied more to the book than the first movie, which actually changed a lot more to fit a full on movie. The first book just has Greg trying to survive middle school and live his life, this movie does a good job sticking close to that.
Just a reminder since everybody looks like Greg's drawings in this movie. That means that his drawing's are hyper realistic
Nah having it live action made more sense since we are meant to pretend that he is real and just drawing cartoons.
"This new one feels like I'm just being given the same thing but worse"
Legit definition of Disney remakes
4:40
It was, actually. In the first book, Greg came up with Zoo Wee Mama and Rowley helped him make the comics. But Greg got tired of the idea and gave the series to Rowley. In the live action movies, they streamlined it by making it so Rowley came up with Zoo Wee Mama instead.
The movie feels unfinished as hell. Missing scenes and animation that glitches, dialogue that is poorly edited in and poorly sinked. Something tells me that if the movie was delayed it would’ve been better.
It just really doesn’t make sense. The entire style is based off middle school doodles, but in this adaptation he has a hyper realistic art style.
to be fair they don't need to include every single thing. we already read the book. we already watched the live-action movie. its fine ti cut some stuff out. i personally think the movie is really good.
I don’t know if this the best way to describe it, but not only is the pacing really bad
But it also felt as if the movie was told through a “flashback” or “flash forward” ? Does that make sense?
I think the biggest thing to take away here is that it has this more cartoony feel to it in the sense that you don't get a sense of time passing. In the book and first movie, it takes place across the whole school year, but this new movie squeezes half the major elements of the book over the span of the first two months of Greg's first year of middle school
I was so excited that we were getting a Wimpy Kid TV show, only to be hit with the crushing revelation that it would be a 50 minute special instead.
Nobody said that it was a TV show lol
Honestly, this would've worked better as a TV show.
@@qwerty5684 It was said to be a movie, but then Jeff Kinney said it would be a TV show, then it was revealed that it would be a 50 minute special.
@@rpmguy648 When did he say it was a TV show
@@qwerty5684 I don't remember when, but he did announce it and he said they had 2 episodes written.
Wait, Roderick only gets like 2 minutes of screentime? This movie is inferior to the live-action one for that fact alone.
Nobody talks about how the advertisement showed Greg pushing a snowball which DIDN'T EVEN HAPPEN IN THE MOVIE.
I do think the art style in the teaser was better that the one in the film
I feel like the animation looked like a weird video game cutscene and it made it barely watchable for me.
I couldn’t agree more with the title of this video. This movie was way too quick and fast paced. The runtime is so short! But I liked the dynamic between Greg and rowley. They’re definitely best friends to the end for sure!
what you have to remember is they're both adaptations of the books, this movie prolly didn't take any inspiration from the live action one, the book clearly wasn't already perfect to make into a movie and since they had to change so much in the adaptations there was no way they would end up being similar.
The original live action movie was more of a combination of all the books, with safety patrol and all coming in on later books, while the movie is more faithful to the first book, which was just as all over the place
I thought it was a fun throwback. The issue is the originals had way more charm and fun, except that awful 4th movie. Also Rodrick is in it for like 2 minutes wtf.
They’re probably saving more Rodrick for the sequel that’ll come out next year
The movies aren't the originals the books are the originals.
@@icecreamhero2375 I think they mean “the originals” as in the original movie trilogy
don't worry mark, your not alone this time, I haven't seen any of the original movies in around 6 years and I even didn't like it, I do really love the animation though, it is pretty amazing
Didn’t anyone else feel like that Rodrick and Frank Heffley kinda felt useless in this movie?
I feel like they should’ve deserved a lot more screen time than they got.
Since your wondering Mark yes in the book Greg did come up with the concept and even wrote the first zoo wee mama comic. But he got bored and gave it to Rowley who then took full credit after zoo wee mama got so in the school newspaper. That then set up Greg asking Rowley to at least be credited but Rowley said that he came up with it and he didn't have anything to do with it.
They ruined Greg's comic when he won the competition.
This is exactly what i thought of the movie, a disappointing adaptation that can barely compare to the 3 classic films, and the original book
it's so weir dthough like the live action version is actually the good one instead of being the other way around like always
The zoo wee mama thing in the books was basically greg getting tired of it and giving it to Rowley, not Rowley stealing it.
I thought the movie was nice, but I do definitely agree with you on Greg's character change. Also, it didn't have enough Rodrick.
I can kind of tell the people who wrote this saw a few of those "Greg Heffley is a sociopath" videos and probably toned down his egotistic traits because of it
Disney: We just made a diary of a wimpy movie
Us: so you know how the plot and characters of the books go?
Disney: what books?
i feel like the best way to describe the new diary of a wimpy kid movie is that it's like if you picked up the book from the library, didn't read any of the text and instead just looked at the pictures. and also a bunch of pages were missing from the book because the last person who got it from the library hated books or something.
Diary of a Wimpy Kid should’ve been a faithful animated series where each season would adapt a book. The art style could be either 2D or stylish 3D like The Peanuts Movie.
Susan's low quality voice lines were the worst i've ever seen. I understand its a kids movie but that was just unacceptable.
Fun Fact: Frank Heffley is voiced by Chris Diamontopoulos. He also played Mickey Mouse and Donald in Invincible, as well as Moe in the 2012 Three Stooges movie.
So that's cool I guess.
That's an interesting last name
Wait Mickey Mouse and Donald Duck was in Invincible, I’ve never seen the show, someone please explain this to me
@@IcyDiamond nah, Donald is a character in invincible. And he is saying Chris plays Mickey Mouse in modern iterations of the character
@@winsonwieny6720 Ah I see, thanks for the clarity
I loved that movie and Greg's dad was great.
4:40 Greg and Rowley actually did come up with Zoo-Wee-Mama together in the book yes. And Rowley gets attached to it and decides to make it his own (in fact them coming up with it together in this could have worked better because in the book, Greg asks Rowley to at least give him some credit since they came up with it together only for Rowley to claim it was his own idea, which is what led to them fighting on the blacktop to begin with).
That’s probably the only time I ever sided with Greg during one of his feuds with Rowley.
Yes. I read through the first book recently and Greg did come up with zoo-wee-mama.
can we also talk about how Greg hands Manny an invisible model for the pumpkin basket when they leave for trick or treating
This was like The Peanuts movie from Blue Sky Studios
But not as good
"The New Diary of a Wimpy Movie is DISAPPOINTING..."
Why am I *not* surprised?
yes in the book greg does indeed invent the term "Zoo Wee Mama!" if you were wondering.
“Maybe if any of these movies were good, I’d like them more”
If you wouldn’t have gotten hurt, you wouldn’t be in so much pain!
I really think that Diary of a Wimpy Kid would work well as a TV series.
Saw the movie on Disney+, all I could think was "no way it's out?" But didn't really have any time to watch it, overall great video so far Mark
@JACKSEPTICEYE'S DAD DESERVED IT LMFAO don't care about Markiplier but you could be doing things that're so much more helpful with your life
“The new diary of a wimpy kid movie is DISAPPOINTING”
Your mom said that you were disappointing too when you came out.
Yeah in the original book it was Greg who came up with Zoo Wee Mama but he got tired of it while Rowley loved it and kept doing it.
hopefully they realise their mistakes and once they make the next movie it can be 10x better
im not sure, but from what i know i think theyre gonna make more of these "movies" for the other books, and if Rodrick's Rule is not good, i dont know what theyre doing
but seriously, their design is genuinely adorable, i love it
Theyr'e already making the next movie. There's an interview on YOutube on the channel "Mama's Geeky" with the guy who voices Greg, he basically says they're in the misdst of making it, I dunno if that means just voicework or what, but the script is definitely there, and I'm guessing some work on animationhas been done. If I were totake a wild conjecture, I would say Disney's intention is to release the second movie next December to coincide with this anniversary of this movie's release. Not the exact day just a Friday in December that isn't also Avatar 2's release date.
@@poisonedyoyo highly doubt it will take them a whole year to make another one of these, they should be in the flow by now
nah it's disney, they never fix anything
@@ironmaster6496 jeff is heavily involved tho, and he replied to a tweet talking about improvements
i feel as if they re-did every single thing from the book people would complain about that. i respect their decisions to change things up but the 2010 live action film will always be my preferred version of course
4:37 In the books, Greg and Rowley work on the comics together, and Greg lets Rowley take ownership of it because it isn’t making him popular like it did for someone else. Then the comics ironically become popular right after Greg leaves.
manny is horrifying, so horrifying he needs to be my new pfp
I gotta give kudos to both the live action movies and this movie for trying to adapt a 2D art style into either live action or 3D, though I'll admit that the way the characters look in 3D were always kinda uncanny to me. The colors are pretty though, they remind me of the Peanuts movie.
Also this movie woulda benefitted from more Rodrick 😔
Well the sequel will probably have more Rodrick
@@IcyDiamond OH HELL YEAH
@@curley-clown Yeah it’s gonna adapt Rodrick Rules, so Rodrick will probably be a second main character to Greg
@@IcyDiamond They're already making a sequel?!
@@averageboi Yeah, I imagine these will be pumped out every year (maybe sooner) since the first was about an hour long and I can't see them straying from that formula for subsequent films
6:28 WHAT DID MANNY JUST SAY
Snake road
lmao
My main issue was that they tried to cram so much into 50 minutes and it all feels so rushed and just a watered down version of the original.
Seeing the title: "Okay, whatever he says, I am pretty sure I'll check it out anyway."
Video: "Greg is not a jerk anymore."
Me: "I was proven wrong. Now I don't know if I should watch it or not."
It is worth noting that Greg does originally come up with Zoo Wee Mama in the original book.
The most disappointing thing about it is that they didn’t even use any of the actors from the live actions movies, not even Rodrick!
Maybe because the actors in the movie got old as the years go by after _Dog Days._
As for the actor of Rodrick, he aged very well. (Look at the video of his reaction on Long Haul movie)
I really don't want to hear 23 year old men trying to replicate the voices they did when they were the proper age for the characters, or trying to use their current voices for these roles that'd be so awkward lmao
Maybe they could have had cameos though, that would have been cool
Why they? They are grown up. Why are you so attached to the movies the true source is the books.
I also don't like how they didn't put in the part where their mom found the really weird magazine Rodrick had and rodrick's mom got mad at him and she said "is there anything you want to say to women for owning this offensive magazine?" And Rodrick said "I'm sorry women" and then rodrick's band clapped
Fun fact none of the clips from the first teaser are even in and the thing is the clips that were better than anything that was actually in the movie
“Maybe if these movies were better I’d like them more”
-LS Mark 2021
I honestly thought this was going to be an animated series when it was first announced, but I guess I was wrong.
Something also that was good about this movie was the teenagers in the red truck all talked because in the book and the 1st live action movie, there was one guy who didn’t talk at all but in this, they all talked.
I think that there comes a time when a franchise has to stop being milked.
The movie was fine,but mark has a point it’s kinda disappointing and Greg is less of a jerk.
That's how it is in the books. The movies made Greg a bigger jerk. In the books Greg is selfish and egotistical but more of an unfortunate victim of circumstance. For example one of my favorite books in the series, Cabin Fever, Greg wanted to have his own Holiday Bazaar because the one at school is overpriced. He and Rowley put up a green poster on the school. It rains and there is a green spot on the side of the school. The school thinks it's graffiti. The cops come to the school and interrogate the kids. Greg is less selfish jerk and more straight man reacting to idiocy around him.
@@icecreamhero2375 yea
As disappointing as this movie was, they’re still planning to adapt all the books in the series in animated format eventually. We’re getting Rodrick rules next year. Oh well!
I honestly think that Roderick rules will be better, especially how they have slightly more to work with
@@badtzmaro heck, even the first movie was meh at best when it came out.
wait a minute your backround music is my outro lets go. (Not saying I made it, saying we used the same song)
3:32 "you broke my h" *walks away*