The Secret Life of Pronouns: James Pennebaker at TEDxAustin
Vložit
- čas přidán 21. 07. 2024
- I, You, Me, We, Us -- small words with the tremendous ability to illuminate who we are and how we're feeling.
Chair of the Department of Psychology at one of the largest universities in the country, Jamie delves into our use of language and how it can reflect -- and reshape -- our understanding of ourselves, our interactions with others and our underlying feelings of strength and empowerment.
Extend the conversation and expand on ideas with James Pennebaker: join their Opal Brainstorm at tedxaustin.ouropal.com/brains...
In the spirit of ideas worth spreading, TEDx is a program of local, self-organized events that bring people together to share a TED-like experience. At a TEDx event, TEDTalks video and live speakers combine to spark deep discussion and connection in a small group. These local, self-organized events are branded TEDx, where x = independently organized TED event. The TED Conference provides general guidance for the TEDx program, but individual TEDx events are self-organized.* (*Subject to certain rules and regulations)
This guy would be very good at identifying the Imposter in Among Us
Jordan Petersen's Self Authoring bought me here. Amazing Sir. Thank you
Wow, was recommended this Ted Talk by my Daygame Coach back in 2014 and only re-watched the programme and saw his comment on watching this talk!! I am so glad I did and will defintely be using this when talking with others and especially women. Cheers Yad and especial appaluse to James Pennebaker.
Which coach recommended you this talk? And how does it help you talking with others?
Amazing insight. Words show yourself! That's why you should check your own writing. Awesome.
Function words and their relevance to Autism (Theory of Mind)
Has anyone discussed the relevance of function words and Autis??? Given Dr Pennebakers insistence that function words are "social" and disclose how people are relating, it seams incredibly important to ASD and Simon Baron Cohen's Theory of Mind. I haven't been this excited about research since Grad school. If anyone has a direction for me to pursue, I'd be most grateful.
I was playing on what he said about the boss and the underling, the boss does not use I or me and the underling does. So, I omitted some pronouns in a yes, a deliberate falsification. Well put. Sometimes you read a story in the New Yorker or Times and they refer to themselves (the writer) that way, so snobby, I thought. It made them seem more objective, though. That's the key, how they are perceived and that gives words power. Perception and influence; powerful tools. I love words, don't you?
As a forensic handwriting analyst who has also studied statement analysis, I find this material relates well to the way people write. For example, the way the single personal pronoun I is written (its shape, size), the distance it is placed from other letters, the direction it leans, in the context of that handwriting all reveal a great deal about the person.
Do you have any data to back that up?
Fascinating!
Can we have a reference list for this TED-Talk?
I suggest everyone to research Dr. Sarno's work, about the Mind + Body. He's been touting this for decades. Also, look up the film "All The Rage", playing in some theaters now.
Thank you for sharing your knowledge!
This could be used to determine how suggestible & therefore hypnotisable people are, as to a large degree it's based of personalibilty, & if that's determined by a Pronoun match index, we then have an objective method as to who is more hypnotisable by whom.
This viewer found Mr. Pennebaker's talk quite enlightening and hopes all viewers can gain some insight into their own interpersonal communications.
Gadgetwhore2
Gadgetwhore2
I thought it was a brilliant talk, but I can instantly think of many people who do not fit the described rule, quite the reverse in fact. One of many you can check for yourself in film, would be Lord Mountbatten. In describing the history of the WWII in Indonesia and the Pacific, he uses the word "I" so much, that it is hard to imagine that he didn't win the war by himself.
I think context matters here - in recounting personal history heavy ‘I’ use would likely be present in correlation with a sense of personal agency. Active voice for the action man!
This is different from the present, more ‘management’ based context highlighted by JP’s examples.
@@TheTrippnotist I don't think you have spent many hours in management meetings. When managing directors are doing badly, some of them will go into it's "all about me speeches". I, I , I.
As a programming student, I still find it somewhat arbitrary to create programs to monitor text. The only convenience of texting is for rapid communication of direct statements; the backbone of the new business industry. But social conversation from texting has destroy faces, voices, bodies, and even flexible format which is necessary in getting along with other people. I'd rather see the hardware industry bridge that gap than see mediocrity exist where normal people will shy away from the outside in favor of texting. But maybe being owned by industry is the one necessary human mistake that needs to happen in order for that bridge to be built. We may one day program Augmented Intelligence rather than created Artificial Intelligence.
I would find it interesting to see how function word use is connected to mb personality types.
oh yes! That'll be interesting!
myers-briggs isn't relevant in academia. they might do this, and I think they already did, with regards to big five types.
Yes, I heard it too.
In IEMT devised by Andrew Austin we pay special attention to pro-nouns and use this work the help with many emotional and identity based issues. The work is also influenced by David Grove’s work.
The methods used to study group relatioships make me think that "Person of Interest" is more than a TV show. Is Harold Finch's charachter based on James Pennebaker?
Am I the only one that hears the words "Fuckin' dead" within the first seconds of the video?
P.S. I'm also using head phones....
I have heard also.
He seeks and he finds.
Happened upon this while in search for information on how to write an essay without first person pronouns. This is proving to be a difficult task. Does anyone have any advice?
Michael Dodd Bob Saget.
Michael Dodd : Simple. Do not write dialogues and do not write about yourself!
How did the essay go?
I am answering too late but there I work ...teachers called a former secretary the 'royal we'...she was bossy, straight, impeccable and super organized...yet she never asked I ask you to..or Do this or that...but she used that pronoun: 'we' because she was in a position of power over the rest of the staff since she was in charge of the whole organization of our institution.
OK, then, fine, in the opinion of this particular CZcamsr, that's a good explanation.
he aint the best public speaker but the subject matter is incredibly interesting
Brought here from TikTok
it all correlates but correlation doesn't imply causation; so what comes first: the chicken or the egg?
The cock
Hegel.
yea you’re right it’s probably the words that are causing the depression!!! that makes sense! stop lol
Dexter, you seem a little obsessed with Dr. Pennebaker. You OK, bud? =0\
What he misses totally is the subconscious sentences within the paragraphs of language... the subconscious always tells the truth and does not keep secrets or deceive.... it tells you everything in hidden code though very very very small tiny decimal percentage of people can hear the subconscious speak
That's exactly what he's talking about, the words no one gives much thought about, granted there's also patterns like Milton Erickson's analogue marking etc.
Be careful listening to what they say.
how did the story about trauma journaling connect to the rest of the video? people saying I on their journal fared worse? Never made that clear.. great video otherwise
Fantastic. It's true. High status people are the best liars. That's why they're high status.
Introvert, extrovert, selfish (individualist),
Your use of "this viewer" instead of "I" seemed like a deliberate falsification of your ordinary speech and thought process, a self-conscious affectation. I don't think that is preferable to saying, "I liked this speech!"
6:00 Never seen a guy utter so many words without saying anything of substance. The art of beating around the bush! It's TED! Get to the point already! Gosh! All he does is restate the obvious -- "am" is the present tense. Duh. Tell me something I don't already know. This guy needs the hook or an editor!!! Chuckle-headed verbosity!